Indian Tsunami Early Warning System Dr. T. Srinivasa Kumar Head, Advisory Services and Satellite Oceanography Group In-charge, Indian Tsunami Early Warning Centre (ITEWC) Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS) Hyderabad, India
Tsunami Workshop, Port Alberni March 27-28, 2014
Indian Ocean Tsunami of December 26, 2004 Ø The worst tsunami in recorded history on December 26, 2004 Ø Magnitude 9.2 (third strongest earthquake ever recorded on a seismograph) Ø Lasted 10 minutes (longest lasting earthquake in history) Ø 229,866 confirmed dead, which includes 42,883 missing and never accounted for Ø More than $7 billion dollars damage
Reasons for huge loss….. Ø Many nations in the Indian Ocean did not even recognize the word “tsunami” Ø Absence of a Tsunami Early Warning Systems Ø None had tsunami preparedness programs in place Ø Ignorance of the natural signs of a tsunami led to inappropriate actions
Tsunami Risk Assessment Historical Tsunamis in the Indian Ocean o 12 Apr, 1762 (BoB EQ) – 1.8 M o 31 Dec, 1881 (Car Nicobar EQ) o 27 Aug, 1883 (Krakatoa) – 2 M o 26 Jun, 1941 (Andaman EQ) o 27 Nov, 1945 (Makran EQ) – 12 M o 19 Aug, 1977 (Sunda EQ) – 5 M o 26 Dec, 2004 (Sumatra EQ) – 30 M o 28 Mar, 2005 (Sumatra EQ) – 4 M o 12 Sept, 2007 (Sumatra EQ) – 0.6 M o 11 Apr, 2012 (Sumatra EQ) – 1 M
Pakistan (M7.6) Sept 24, 2013 Makran (M8.5) Nov. 27, 1945
Car Nicobar (M7.9), Dec. 31, 1881
Sumatra (M9.3) Dec. 26, 2004 Sumatra (M8.5), April 11, 2012 Bengkulu (M8.4) Sep 12, 2007
> M7
Java (M7.8) July 17, 2006
Tsunamigenic potential EQs for India o Andaman-Sumatra & Makran subdution zones o EQ Mag > 6.5 o Earthquakes under or near ocean o Depth < 100km o Vertical movement of the sea-floor
Tsunami Risk Assessment Tsunami Travel Times & Response time • Depending upon the Earthquake location (Makran/Andaman-Sumatra Subduction Zone) the response time for evacuation of coastal population could range between 20 min to few hours. • As Andaman & Nicobar Islands are situated right on subduction zone the available response time is very short
• If Earthquake occurs at Makran Subduction zone, Travel Time to nearest Indian Coast (Gujarat) are 2 to 3 hrs
• If Earthquake happens at Sumatra, travel times to nearest coast (A&N Islands) are 20 to 30 min • For Indian main land travel times are 2 to 3 hrs
Tsunami Early Warning System Detec9on
Warnings
Dissemina9on
Bathymetry VSAT
Seismic Network TSUNAMI WARNINGS!!! INSAT
BPR Network
Tsunami Modelling
Capacity Building
GPRS Topography R&D
INMARSAT
Tide gauge Network
Observation Networks
Costal Vulnerability
Communications
Simulations
Last mile connectivity
Tsunami Warning Centre
24 x 7 opera9ons
Heterogeneous Real-Time Data from a variety of Sensors Data Acquisition, Display, Processing, Archival Numerical Modeling and Decision Support Generation of Advisories and Dissemination Mission Critical - Infrastructure to be highly available
Observation Networks Ø Seismic Network: • More than 300 Indian and International Seismic Stations communicating via Satellite & broadband links • Autolocation of earthquake in 3 to 12 mins
Ø Tsunami Buoy Network: • 7 Bottom Pressure Recorders communicating via acoustic & Saatellite links
Ø Tidegauge Network: • 26 Tideguages • Presssure, Radar & Shaft Encoders commicating via Satellite & GPRSblinks
Ø HF Radar Network: § 5 sets of coastal radars communicating via VSAT and broadband links
Inundation Modelling for Historical Events § Field Surveys for Assessment of 2004 tsunami impact § TUNAMI Model set up § Inundation Modelling and Vulnerability mapping for Historic Earthquakes & Worst Case Scenarios 1m contours overlaid on ortho image
§ 1:25000 scale maps using Cartosat § 1:5000 scale maps using ALTM § Maps used by DMOs as guidance
Tsunami Vulnerability Map
Modelling for Operational Forecasting Open Ocean Propagation Database • Model Domain with 3.2 million grids • Database of Scenarios covering both Makran and Sunda Tsunamigenic Zones • ~1400 unit sources each of 100 X 50 km area representing rupture caused by EQ of M 7.5 with slip as 1m • Depending on EQ’s location and magnitude basic unit source open ocean propagation scenarios are either scaled up or down • Expected Wave Arrival & Amplitude forecasts at 1800 Costal Forecast Points (CFPs) in the Indian Ocean Coast • CFPs are then rendered to create threat profile for Coastal Forecast Zones (CFZs)
Model Output Parameters EQ location map
Threat Map
§
T1 (Time of arrival of the minimum detectable positive amplitude wave)
§
T2 (Time of first exceedance of the Threat Threshold)
§
T3 (Time of arrival of max_beach)
§
T4 (Time when the last exceedance of the Threat Threshold is forecast) max_beach (Maximum Positive wave amplitude at the shore line) max_deep (Maximum positive wave amplitude in deep water in each coastal zone) Depth (Depth of the water where the max_deep occurs)
• • Travel time map
Directivity Map
•
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Threat Status
Ac9on to be taken
Dissemina9on to
WARNING
Public should be advised to move inland towards higher grounds. Vessels should move into deep Ocean
MoES, MHA, NDMA, NCMC, NDRF BaEalions, SEOC, DEOC, Public, Media
Public should be advised to avoid beaches and low-‐ lying coastal areas. Vessels should move into deep Ocean
MoES, MHA, NDMA, NCMC, NDRF BaEalions, SEOC, DEOC, Public, Media
No immediate acHon is required
MoES, MHA, NDMA, NCMC, NDRF BaEalions, SEOC, DEOC, Media
All clear determinaHon to be made by the local authoriHes
MoES, MHA, NDMA, NCMC, NDRF BaEalions, SEOC, DEOC, Public, Media
ALERT
WATCH
THREAT PASSED
Decision Support Software
Bulletin Types and Content (i) Tsunami Exchange and (ii) Tsunami Public
Bulletin type
Information
Type-1
Preliminary EQ Parameters
EQ info, Tsunamigenic poten.
MoES MHA NDMA
Tsunami Exchange Bulletins
Threat Passed
Public
Type-2
WARNING
WATCH
Type-2
Type-3
Real-time water level observations indicating Tsunami Generation
as and when the first real-time water level observation is available
Type-3
Real-time water level observations indicating Tsunami Generation + THREAT PASSED information for individual Zones
Hourly update / as and when the subsequent realtime water level observations are available
Final Bulletin Threat Passed
Bulletin-1
T0 + 20
as and when revised earthquake parameters are available
T1, T2, T3, T4, Max_beach, Depth, Obs
INCOIS
Threat (WARNING / ALERT / WATCH) Information from Model Scenarios Revised EQ Parameters and model results
Bulletin-2, 3,4….
EQ info, Tsunamigenic potential
No significant tsunami
WARNING ALERT
T0 + 10
No Threat Information from Model Scenarios
Bulletin-1
ALERT
Time of issue (Earthquake Origin time as T0) mins
Tsunami Public Bulletins
Bulletin-2, 3,4…. T2,Max_beach, Obs
Type-4 (Final )
Threat Passed
Final Bulletin Threat Passed
Threat Passed
120 mins after the last exceedance of 0.5 M threat threshold at last Indian Ocean member state
All Bulletins are sequentially numbered regardless of the bulletin type
Bulletin Formats Ø Bulletin Formats § § § §
Notification Messages are issued in text format Bulletins are issued in both text and html formats Graphics are made available in jpg or png format on the website Spatial data is made available in dbf format through the ftp site
NOTIFICATION MESSAGE 1 INDIAN TSUNAMI EARLY WARNING CENTER (ITEWC) ISSUED AT: 0635 IST Wednesday 20 November 2013 TO: NATIONAL NTWC BULLETIN RECIPIENTS FROM: ITEWC NOTIFICATION: ITEWC INCOIS HAS JUST ISSUED TEST BULLETIN 1 (PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE INFORMATION) FOR THE INDIA, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING TEST EARTHQUAKE EVENT: MAGNITUDE: DEPTH: DATE: ORIGIN TIME: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: LOCATION:
8.8 M 10 km 20 Nov 2013 0630 IST 3.35 N 95.96 E Northern Sumatra
TO VIEW THE TEST BULLETIN GO TO ITEWC INCOIS WEBSITE AT: www.incois.gov.in/Incois/tsunami/COMM_ntwclogin.jsp NTWC IS A SERVICE OF ITEWC, INCOIS FOR PROVIDING TSUNAMI ADVISORIES FOR INDIA. GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATION FOR THIS TEST EVENT IS AVAILABLE FROM: INDIAN TSUNAMI EARLY WARNING CENTER (ITEWC) INDIAN NATIONAL CENTRE FOR OCEAN INFORMATION SERVICES (INCOIS) ADDRESS:"OCEAN VALLEY", PRAGATHI NAGAR (BO), NIZAMPET (SO), HYDERABAD - 500 090, INDIA. PHONE: 91-40-23895011 FAX: 91-40-23895012 EMAIL:
[email protected] WEB: WWW.INCOIS.GOV.IN YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS "NOTIFICATION MESSAGE" VIA DSS_1_0 (MANUAL (INTERACTIVE)) CONFIGURED TO SEND MAIL FROM
[email protected] END OF NOTIFICATION MESSAGE
Sample Notification Message
Sample Bulletins
Graphical Products
EQ Location
Threat Status
Travel Time Map
Updated Threat Status
Directivity Map
RTSP Threat Status
Dissemination of Tsunami Bulletins International Level
Fax
All 23 Indian ocean rim countries
National Level
MHA, NDMA, MoES, NDRF Head quarters, IMD & CWC
Email
SMS
Web
GTS
State Level
Principal Secretaries (Revenue) of Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Orissa, Tamilnadu, West Bengal, Lakshadweep and Puducherry
District Level
DROs of Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam, East Godavari, West Godavari, Krishna, Guntur, Prakasham, and S.P.S Nellore
Institutional
1-10 NDRF Battalions, ALL control rooms of A&N Islands, HQWNC, HQENC, HQANC, HQSNC, NOIC Tamilnadu, Gujarat, West Bengal, NPCIL, Mumbai, Madras Atomic Power Station, Tarapur Atomic Power Station (1&2, 3&4), Kudankulam Atomic Power Unit, SHAR, MRCC, Coast Guards, Port Officers, Coastal Industries (Reliance) Media & Public subscriptions
Tsunami Mock drills ITEWC Participated in two Tsunami mock drills (i) IOWave09 on October 14, 2009 and ii) IOWave11 on October 12, 2011
Ø Lessons Learnt from the National Exercise ü Warning Centre dissemination process •
Warning Centre disseminated 15 bulletins in total, through Email, Fax, SMS, GTS and Web to 50 national and 23 international contacts
ü Stakeholders reception process Communication mode
Elapsed time
Email
0 - 94 mins
Fax
0 - 111 mins
SMS
0 - 20 mins
ü Time taken to notify public State
Making a decision on public warning (from time of receipt of warning)
Formulation of public notification (from time of decision)
Activation of public notification systems (from time of notification formulated
Total Elapsed time
Maharashtra
20
40
25
1 hr 20 mins
Puducherry
10
5
5
20 mins
Orissa
5
5
10
20 mins
Communication Tests Ø Communication Tests 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Ø
March 16, 2011 (NTWCs) June 15, 2011 (NTWCs & National DMOs) September 14, 2011 (NTWCs & National DMOs) December 14, 2011 (NTWCs) June 13, 2012 (NTWCs) December 12, 2012 (NTWCs) June 13, 2013 (NTWCs & National DMOs) December 11, 2013 (NTWCs)
Modes of Communication • International: Email, Fax, GTS, SMS, Web • National: Email, Fax, SMS, Web
Ø
Performance till now: • Compared 6 COMMs test results • Significant improvement over SMS, Email & Web
16 Mar 2011
15 Jun 2011 Time Delay (Mins)
14 Sep 2011
14 Dec 2011
No. of NTWCs Received
Time Delay (Mins)
No. of NTWCs Received
Time Delay (Mins)
13 Jun 2012
12 Dec 2012
No. of NTWCs Received
Time Delay (Mins)
No. of NTWCs Received
Mode
No. of NTWCs Received
Time Delay (Mins)
No. of NTWCs Received
Time Delay (Mins)
Email
19/23
0 – 11
20/22
0 – 48
22/23
0 – 15
17/19
0–9
18/21
0–2
15/17
0–4
Fax
7/23
0 – 61
10/22
0 – 91
12/23
0 – 93
13/19
0 – 35
12/21
0 – 35
6/17
0 – 32
GTS
12/23
0–5
17/22
0 – 17
17/23
0 – 26
16/19
0 – 25
15/21
0–7
12/17
0 – 14
SMS
--
--
--
--
13/23
0 – 13
15/19
0 – 23
15/21
0–1
14/17
0–3
Capacity Building, Education and Training
Ø Workshops, seminars, Trainings (na9onal & interna9onal), Exhibi9ons Ø Capacity building to public (especially in near-‐source vulnerable coastal areas) on responding to earthquakes & tsunami warnings Ø Capacity building to coastal administrators, disaster management officials and public on SOPs, use of tsunami inunda9on maps, etc. Ø Include disaster awareness and response related topics in primary, secondary and high school curriculum.
Education Material for Tsunami Preparedness Tsunami Preparedness Material § Tsunami Warning Centre operations Handbook & User guide § Tsunami awareness films for Administrators, General public and Children § Tsunami awareness & preparedness posters § Leaflets in mutliple local languages
8.5 M earthquake on April 11, 2012 Time line
14:08
Earthquake
8.5 M 14:16
Bulletin - 1
14:20
Bulletin - 2
15:21
Bulletin - 3
15:48
Bulletin - 4 Warning for Indira Point, Komatra & Katchal Island and Car Nicobar
16:13
8.2 M 16:19
Observed water level 1.0 M change at Meulaboh & 0.2 M at Nicobar
17:02
18:08
Bulletin - 5
Bulletin - 6
A L CLEAR
Earthquake
L
Bulletin - 1
16:46
Bulletin - 2
17:08
Bulletin - 3
17:33
Bulletin - 4
18:29
Bulletin - 5
Alert for Indira Point, Komatra & Katchal Island and Car Nicobar Observed water level 0.2M change at Meulaboh
ALL CLEAR
8.5 M earthquake on April 11, 2012 Tsunami Buoy & Tide gauge data during EQ on April 11, 2012
Tsunami Buoy
Tide gauge sensor
HF Radar data during EQ on April 11, 2012
HF Radar Receiver
HF Radar Transmitter
7.6 M Pakistan earthquake on Sept 24, 2013 Pakistan earthquake of Magnitude 7.6 On 24-September-2013 11:29 UTC; 24-September-2013 16:59 IST Minor water level changes are observed at different sea-level stations which could be due to submarine land slides due to this near coast major earthquake .
ITEWC Issued Bulletins Bulletin No 1: Earthquake Information M7.6 Bulletin No 2: No Tsunami threat for India and Indian Ocean region
Tsunamigenic source obtained through Backward Ray tracing Method
S.NO. Station Name (Country) Lat (° N) Long (° E) Expected Time of 1st Arrival (UTC) 1 STB02 (India) 20.80 65.34 12:28 2 Chabahar (Iran) 25.295 60.603 12:39 3 TB12 (India) 20.18 67.65 12:45 4 Suro (Oman) 22.57 59.59 12:46 5 Qurayat (Oman) 23.26 58.92 12:49 6 Muscut (Oman) 23.633 58.566 12:53 7 Jask (Iran) 25.63 57.77 13:25 8 Khawr Wudam (Oman) 23.82 57.52 13:27 9 Diba (Oman) 25.649 56.269 14:01 10 Okha (India) 22.467 69.083 14:38
Observed Time of 1st Arrival (UTC) 12:25 12:40 12:55 12:08 12:06 12:05 14:12 13:14 13:45 17:12
Observed Max. Wave Height (cm) 0.9 11 1.1 18 55 24 06 10 08 02
Challenges & New Initiatives Some Challenges Ø Under-estimation of Initial Magnitude and Tsunami wave heights • Tohoku-Oki Earthquake on March 11, 2011 • Big challenge in case of large earthquakes especially for near-source regions wherein there is a requirement of very quick information
Ø Over-estimation of Forecasted Tsunami wave heights
• Northern Sumatra Earthquake on April 11, 2012 • Tsunami amplitude estimate “ > 2m” at Andaman & Nicobar Islands, but observed 30 cm as the actual displacement was in horizontal direction. This is due to the consideration of thrust fault mechanism in the scenario generation
Ø Emergency Communication • Many remote coastal villages with failed electricity or telephone communications
Ø Non-Seismic Causes (submarine land slides, etc) New Initiatives Ø Densification of Sensor Networks: Real-time GNSS & SMA Network at A & N Islands Ø Modelling Enhancements (real-time modelling, water level inversion) Ø Visualization and Analysis System for 2D and 3D Geospatial data (3DVAS) Ø VSAT based Communication System for Emergency Operations Centres Ø Integration of Storm Surge Forecast System
Enhancing Seismic & GNSS Network www.isgn.gov.in
Seismic station
GNSS & Strong Motion Network at A&N Islands GNSS station
Hub at INCOIS, Hyderabad
Modelling Enhancements Real-time Water level inversion
Modelling Enhancements • Total no of Indian Ocean Tsunamigenic sources: 2(Andaman &Sumatra, Makran)+7 (includes South China sea, Banda sea, Java sea, Celeb sea) • Total no of Indian Ocean Unit sources: 1320 • New IO Domain Extent: 10E-160E • Spatial Resolution: 2.5Km
• No Of Output Files For Each Scenario:1500 (25 hr)
• Integration of Inversion module into DSS under progress • Inversion for slip distribution at unit sources • Least square fit analysis of green functions and residuals at BPRs • The Planned BPR network will cover the sources at Andaman & Nicobar Islands
Visualization and Analysis System for 2D and 3D Geospatial data (3DVAS) Generation of 3D GIS Maps
Risk analysis and advisory
Base Maps, Hazard Maps, vulnerability maps, database of tsunami and storm surge inundation modeling results, event data, etc.
Ground Survey: GCP, Leveling, Field Photos, Socio-economic census, etc Vulnerability maps integrated with 3D GIS database will aid in making effective disaster management plans
Storm Surge Forecasting - PHAILIN Rushikulya river
Cyclone track forecasted at 1500 IST on 12-‐10-‐2013
Locations along Odisha Coast
Dhepanuapada Lohadigam Humirbana Humirbana Podapadar Podapadar Agasti Naugam Agasti Naugam Ganjam Mayarpada Mayarpada Jayamangalhil Bhramarakudi Bhramarakudi
Model estimated inland extent of inundation (m)
120 70 150 100 250 800 300 150 200 300 -
Observed inland extent of inundation based on field measurement (m)
23 35 101 11 120 106 173 110 670 160 67 65 35 44
Table: Comparison of model estimated inland inundation with post storm field measurements (Precipitation is not included in the model) C o m p a r i s o n o f model estimated residual water level with the residual water level observed by the tide gauge at Paradeep (nearest tide gauge to the landfall point). Note that Paradeep is about 220 km north of landfall point. Storm Surge forecasted by INCOIS based on the track forecasted by IMD at 1500 IST on 12 October 2013
RTSP Operations of ITEWC ITEWC is playing major role in UNESCO’s Ø Intergovernmental Coordination Group for Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (ICG/IOTWS) • As a Regional Tsunami Advisory Service Provider (RTSP) providing bulletins to all Indian Ocean rim countries, together with RTSP Australia & Indonesia Ø Tsunamis and Other Hazards Related to Sea-Level Warning and Mitigation Systems (TOWSWG) • Global Harmonization
Harmonized Products and Terminologies from TOWS-WG Stakeholders: • • • •
Civilians/Public/Media National authorities responsible for public safety NTWCs/NTFPs which will establish the threat level for the corresponding jurisdictions RTSPs which will provide guidance to the National Tsunami Warning Centers and Focal Points
Levels of emergency public response
Threat Level
Evacuation of areas of potential tsunami inundation (based on maps or criteria)
3
Threat of tsunami inundation
2
Threat to coastal marine areas due to strong currents and oscillations in sea level
Clearance of beaches, marine infrastructure and coastal waters due to expected strong currents and oscillations in sea level. On alert in the event that there exists the potential of a tsunami, but given the travel time of the waves, no immediate action is required until more information is available. No action necessary, this is in the case of a distant tsunami or a tsunami in another basin which will have no impact on the local area
1
0
Potential Impact
There is a potential for tsunami impact, but given the travel time, no response of the public is necessary No impact expected, no flooding, no currents