Imagine the result

Lightolier - A Philips Group Brand, Fall River

Phase V Status and Remedial Monitoring Report Lightolier – A Philips Group Brand, Fall River 631 Airport Road Fall River, Massachusetts RTN 4-16359

July 15, 2013

Phase V Status and Remedial Monitoring Report

Budd Batchelder, CHMM Certified Project Manager

Lightolier – A Philips Group Brand 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA RTN 4-16359

Prepared for:

Allen R. Walker, PE, LSP Principal Environmental Engineer

Lightolier - A Philips Group Brand Prepared by:

ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 194 Forbes Road Braintree Massachusetts 02184 Tel 781.356.7300 Fax 781.356.2211 Our Ref.:

BN030015.0000 Date:

July 15, 2013

This document is intended only for the use of the individual or entity for which it was prepared and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this document is strictly prohibited.

Table of Contents

1.  Introduction

1 

2.  General Site Information

1 

3.  Summary of Previous Investigations and Remediation Activities

2 

3.1 

Chlorinated Solvent Release: RTN 4-00553

2 

3.2 

Hydraulic Oil Release: RTN 4-16359

2 

4.  Conceptual Site Model

3 

5.  Description of Monitoring Activities: 310 CMR 40.0892(2)a

5 

5.1 

Current Remedial Operation and Maintenance

6 

5.2 

LNAPL Thickness and Recovery for Reporting Period

6 

6.  Significant Modifications of Monitoring Program Since the Last Status Report: 310 CMR 40.0892(2)b

7 

7.  Evaluation of Performance of the Remedy and Conditions or Problems Noted During Monitoring Program: 310CMR 40.0892(2)c

7 

7.1 

Measured LNAPL Thickness and Recovery Evaluation

7 

7.2 

Sampling and Screening

9 

7.3 

Changes to Remedial Operation and Maintenance

10 

8.  Description of Measures taken to Correct Conditions/ Affecting the Remedy: 310 CMR 40.0892(2)d

10 

9.  Parties Performing Monitoring Activities, Materials Handling and Permits

10 

9.1 

Materials Handling

11 

9.2 

Permits

11 

10.  The Name, License Number, Signature and Seal of the LSP: 310 CMR 40.0892(2)e

11 

11.  References

12 

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

i

Table of Contents

Figures 1.

Site Location Map

2.

Disposal Site Boundary Layout Plan

3.

Groundwater Elevation Contour Map (December 14, 2012)

4.

Cross Section A-A’

5.

LNAPL Thickness Contour Map (Gauged December 14, 2012)

Tables 1

Summary of LNAPL Recovery

Appendices A

Limitations & Service Constraints

B

MassDEP Transmittal Form

C

LNAPL Mobility Diagram

D

LNAPL Thickness & Groundwater Elevation Graphs

E

Cumulative LNAPL Recovery Graph- Interior Wells

F

Notification Letters

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

ii

Abbreviations & Acronyms

AUL

Activity and Use Limitation

BWSC

Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup

CSA

Comprehensive Site Assessment

CSM

Conceptual Site Model

DSB

Disposal Site Boundary

EPH

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons

IRA

Immediate Response Action

I&M

Inspection and Monitoring

ITRC

Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council

LSP

Licensed Site Professional

LNAPL

Light Nonaqueous Phase Liquid

MCP

Massachusetts Contingency Plan

MassDEP

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection

RTN

Release Tracking Number

RAP

Remedial Action Plan

RIP

Remedy Implementation Plan

ROS

Remedy Operation Status

RAO

Response Action Outcome

RP

Responsible Party

SOW

Scope of Work

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

iii

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

1. Introduction ARCADIS U.S., Inc. (ARCADIS) has prepared this Phase V Status and Remedial Monitoring Report, which is in Remedy Operation Status (ROS), on behalf of Lightolier - a Philips Group Brand (Lightolier) for the Disposal Site identified by Release Tracking Number (RTN) 4-16359. The RTN is applicable to a release of light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) on a portion of the property located at 631 Airport Road, Fall River, Massachusetts (the “Site”). A Site Location Map is provided as Figure 1. A Site Plan depicting the local features and the Disposal Site Boundary (DSB) resulting from the LNAPL release is provided as Figure 2 of this report. This ROS report provides the information indicated in 310 CMR Section 40.0892(2) and 40.0893(2) of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) and is subject to the Limitations and Service Constraints included as Appendix A. A Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Bureau of Waste Site Clean-Up (BWSC) Transmittal Form 108 has been signed by the responsible party (RP) and Licensed Site Professional (LSP) of Record to accompany this ROS Report, which was electronically submitted to eDEP (Transaction #574655). A copy of the signed BWSC-108 Transmittal Form that was uploaded with the report will be provided in Appendix B following the electronic submittal. The following sections provide pertinent information as cited in the MCP. 2. General Site Information A detailed Site history was provided in the September 2001 Supplemental Phase II Scope of Work (SOW) and the July 2004 Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) reports prepared by ARCADIS which were submitted to MassDEP. Lightolier has occupied the Site since 1973. It is located in the Fall River Industrial Park and is surrounded by commercial and industrial properties and Massachusetts highway Route 24. Prior to Lightolier’s occupation of the Site, the property was undeveloped. The facility is zoned industrial and is used for the production and distribution of lighting fixtures and corporate offices. Approximately 164 adults use the manufacturing facility an average of 9 hours per day and 205 adults use the corporate facility an average of 9 hours per day. There are no known drinking water supplies in the area. A wetland is located on the southern property line, approximately 500 feet to the south of the Site building. Groundwater has been used for lawn irrigation on occasion by some facilities in the industrial park in the past. The neighboring downgradient facility (American Dryer Corp.) has indicated to Lightolier that groundwater is no longer used for irrigation at that facility. Figure 2 provides a layout map for the Disposal Site portion of the Lightolier property where the release has affected soil and groundwater. Based on available information, the LNAPL release resulted from leaking hydroform press pits, which are concrete lined subsurface reservoirs of varying capacity that are located beneath the hydroform machines used in the production operation.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

1

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

3. Summary of Previous Investigations and Remediation Activities Two distinct releases have affected the Site: a chlorinated solvent release that was assigned RTN 4-00553 by MassDEP, and the hydraulic oil release, which is the subject of this status report, has been assigned RTN 4-16359. 3.1 Chlorinated Solvent Release: RTN 4-00553

The chlorinated solvent release was assessed by O’Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. (OBG). The chlorinated solvent release was found within portions of the Lightolier property and at downgradient property locations. OBG submitted a closure report for this RTN to MassDEP in 1994 in the form of a Class A-3 Response Action Outcome (RAO) Statement and Activity and Use Limitation (AUL). No AUL was filed for the downgradient property as no restrictions were required to maintain a level of no significant risk. The Class A3 RAO statement was necessary because an AUL was required to maintain a level of “No Significant Risk” on the Lightolier property pursuant to 310 CMR 40.1012. The AUL was revised by LFR, Inc. (now ARCADIS) in on behalf of Lightolier in 1999. The AUL was subsequently audited by MassDEP in 2001. Revised AULs were recorded by ARCADIS in 2004 and 2007, due to MassDEP audits. 3.2 Hydraulic Oil Release: RTN 4-16359

The hydraulic oil release was discovered in July 2001. ARCADIS conducted a gauging event in preparation for the MassDEP audit Site inspection discussed above, and measured LNAPL in MW-3. The measured LNAPL triggered a 72-hour reportable condition to MassDEP because the measured thickness was greater than a 0.5 inch. The release was reported to the MassDEP who assigned RTN 4-16359 to the release. An Immediate Response Action (IRA) program was initiated, which included LNAPL recovery through a gauge and bail program. A Phase I Initial Site Investigation Report and Tier Classification was submitted in July 2002 resulting in a Tier II ranking for the hydraulic oil release. This submittal included a Phase II scope of work (SOW). The Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) was submitted in July 2004 and indicated that the release did not pose an Imminent Hazard or significant health risk to current or reasonably foreseeable future human and environmental receptors. However, the report stated that the LNAPL posed a potential risk to future public safety and welfare. In October 2004, a Phase III Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was submitted to MassDEP, which identified the feasible remedial alternative as LNAPL removal, through a gauge and bail program, together with on-going efforts by Lightolier to minimize oil releases through the floor and hydroform pits (in a manner similar to that being conducted under the IRA). The selection of the feasible remedial alternative was based on: intensive, on-going production uses in the production area of the Site building; the industrial park setting of the area and relative risks. An IRA Completion Report was submitted to MassDEP in November 2004.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

2

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

A Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (RIP) was submitted in April 2005 and described performance of the RAP and monitoring of any significant changes based on field evaluations. A Phase IV RIP and Phase IV Completion Statement were submitted in December 2005 to close the Phase IV activities and transition the ongoing work as Phase V Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring in ROS. This report described the components of supplemental investigations and the remedial program to recover LNAPL, as well as reporting procedures. ROS Reports have been submitted at 6-month intervals since May 2006 as required by the MCP. At this time, a permanent solution has not yet been achieved and efforts are continually being implemented by Lightolier to minimize the amount of LNAPL that may be released to the subsurface as part of their operations. The AUL for the chlorinated solvent release (RTN 4-00553) was revised through submittal of a Confirmatory AUL in April 2007 in response to a MassDEP audit of the AUL. The AUL prohibits use of the Site for residential, school or daycare, which are not allowed in the industrial park. The AUL also limits soil excavation within the AUL area. Soil excavation deeper than 2 feet below ground surface (bgs) requires a soil management plan prepared by a LSP. This limitation is not explicitly applicable to the hydraulic oil release, but the DSB for RTN 4-16359 is located entirely within the limits of the AUL. 4. Conceptual Site Model The Conceptual Site Model (CSM) is that LNAPL migrated to the subsurface through the following potential migration pathways:

•

Holes or cracks in the hydraulic oil pits located beneath the concrete floor represent a potential migration pathway for hydraulic oil. Lightolier has previously resealed the hydraulic oil pits and conducts routine inspections of the machines used in the manufacturing processes. Currently, there is no evidence that a complete migration pathway exists in any of the hydraulic oil pits.

•

Cracks in the concrete floor around the machinery represent a potential migration pathway for hydraulic oil. Hydraulic oil may leak onto the floor during routine operation of the equipment, which could potentially migrate to the subsurface through settlement cracks in the floor. Lightolier conducts periodic sealcoating of the concrete floor. Minor leaking from the equipment is unavoidable. The floors are routinely cleaned to recover leaked oil. Currently, there is no evidence that a complete migration pathway exists through cracks in the floors.

The LNAPL area is approximately 400 feet long (north to south), and is on average 100 to 150 feet wide (east to west). The LNAPL area is located under the southeast portion of the building and extends approximately 200 feet south of the building. The area inside the building is considered the LNAPL source area.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

3

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

There is no evidence that LNAPL is migrating or has migrated to nearby surface water bodies or sensitive ecological receptors (wetlands) located on the southern side of the Lightolier property. There have been no indications of a visible sheen on any water bodies during gauging events conducted during the current reporting period. There is no evidence of off-Site migration of dissolved phase petroleum constituents. Groundwater flow at the Site is generally toward the south, and is convergent toward the swale at the south end of the DSB. Groundwater flow in the vicinity of MW-15 (on the west side of the DSB) is somewhat divergent. Groundwater flow in that area is south westerly. No evidence of LNAPL has been observed in ARC-103 or ARC-119, which are located outside the DSB to the west. A groundwater flow contour map based on the December 14, 2012 gauging data is included in Figure 3. A hydrogeologic cross section of the plume from north to south (A-A’) was developed for the Site and is presented in Figure 4. The cross section includes groundwater elevation data from May 29, 2012 and December 14, 2012, and also depicts the measured smear zone. The smear zone is the vertical thickness of LNAPL-affected soil due to water table fluctuation (calculated from the lowest recorded groundwater elevation to the highest measured LNAPL elevation). The cross section indicates the following: 

The geology consists of discontinuous layers and mixtures of broken rock, sand, fill, silt and till.



The predominant soil types between ARC-102 and ARC-109 are sand and gravel. The predominant soil types downgradient of ARC-109 include higher concentrations of sand and silt. The area upgradient of ARC-102 consists of reworked granular fill over a shallow layer of till. The finer grained silt and till down gradient of ARC-109 and has apparently limited the southern migration of LNAPL.



The measured smear zone is greatest at well ARC-109 (approximately 6 feet). Wells in the source area exhibit smear zone thicknesses of approximately 3 to 4 feet. Note that the bottom of the smear zone at MW-11 and MW-13 is inferred because there have been gauging events when LNAPL was measured to the bottom of these wells.



The groundwater gradient is significantly different north and south of ARC-108. The gradient north of ARC-108 is significantly steeper than the gradient to the south of ARC-108.



Little to no seasonal variability in groundwater gradient is evident north of ARC-108.



The gradients measured south of ARC-108 exhibited seasonal variability. The gradient measured in May was gradual, but sloped to the south, while the gradient measured in December is essentially flat and may slope to the north slightly.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

4

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

The CSM for the Site is that LNAPL accumulation is greatest at ARC-109 because the formation is relatively porous and permits groundwater and LNAPL to flow relatively easily through the formation. The formation down gradient of ARC-109 is relatively impermeable and thus restricts flow of LNAPL and groundwater. Additionally, the groundwater gradient levels off a short distance downgradient of ARC-109, which further restricts LNAPL flow. A transmissivity evaluation was conducted to evaluate LNAPL recoverability at MW-14 and ARC-109 in the last reporting period. The findings were reported in the last ROS status report and are summarized as follows: 

LNAPL is recoverable at both locations;



The transmissivity was an order of magnitude higher at MW-14 than at ARC-109;



The recoverable volume of LNAPL beneath the footprint of the building may be approaching de- minimis levels; and



LNAPL recovery is still warranted and recommended.

ARCADIS will continue to evaluate LNAPL recoverability at the Site. The calculated smear zone for wells outside the footprint of the building is based on measurements from two or three seasons of gauging data. As the gauging data set increases, it is likely that the smear zone for the newer wells will expand based on greater ranges measured due to seasonal fluctuation. This is anticipated due to complete measurement of the smear zone and not due to additional LNAPL in the subsurface. 5. Description of Monitoring Activities: 310 CMR 40.0892(2)a The regular monitoring activities at the Site include: 



Monthly Site visits for gauging and product recovery with activities including: o

Documenting groundwater elevation measurements and the presence and thickness of the product. Wells included in the gauging events are listed in Table 1.

o

Product or LNAPL recovery from wells, if encountered; and

o

Changing out absorbent socks if product is measured in a well.

Checking surface water at swale for a sheen or presence of hydraulic fluid.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

5

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA



Annual groundwater sampling for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) analysis. Seven wells outside the DSB and one well inside the southern portion of the DSB are sampled annually in the spring. The first annual sampling event was conducted in March 2012. A sampling event was conducted in May 2013, which will be included in the next status report.



Semi-annual reporting of activities and data.

5.1 Current Remedial Operation and Maintenance

The remedial method employed at the Site during this reporting period consisted of routine gauging events and active recovery using a peristaltic pump. LNAPL was recovered passively between gauging events by placing absorbent socks in monitoring wells where LNAPL is gauged. A total of seven gauging events were conducted in the current reporting period from November 19, 2012 through April 10, 2013. The following wells are included in the gauge and bail program: MW-3, MW-11 through MW-19 (including MW-16D), and ARC-101 through ARC-120. A LNAPL thickness contour map calculated from the May 29, 2012 gauging event is shown on Figure 5. The December 14, 2012 gauging event was selected for LNAPL thickness mapping because this was the event when maximum product thickness (4.36 feet at ARC-109) has been observed to date. Groundwater sampling is conducted annually to confirm the presence and stability of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater. The extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater is generally defined by the DSB depicted in Figure 2. The last round of groundwater sampling was conducted in May 2013 and included the following wells: ARC-101, ARC-106, ARC-107, ARC-108, ARC-112, ARC-114, ARC-116, ARC117, ARC-118, ARC-119, and MW-18. 5.2 LNAPL Thickness and Recovery for Reporting Period

A total of eight gauging events were conducted during the current reporting period from November 19, 2012 through April 10, 2013. A summary of LNAPL recovery and gauging data is provided in Table 1. During the current reporting period, approximately 24 gallons of LNAPL was recovered through gauge and bail events. This includes approximately 5 gallons of recovery from wells located inside the Site building, and 19 gallons of recovery from wells outside of the Site building. Five gallons was recovered from newly installed well MW16D. The maximum LNAPL recovery was from well MW-14. Approximately 8 gallons of LNAPL was recovered from this well during the current reporting period. Approximately 5 gallons of LNAPL was recovered from ARC-109 during the current reporting period. Recovery from ARC-109 was limited during the current reporting period because the well was covered with snow banks from parking lot plowing and was inaccessible for the two of the eight gauging events.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

6

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

As shown on Table 1, LNAPL recovered from MW-14 accounts for 5,765 gallons of the 6,140 gallons recovered since May 2006. LNAPL thicknesses measured in ARC-109 ranged from 0.15 feet to 4.36 feet during the current reporting period. Based on the gauging data available (December 2011 to present), the observed smear zone measured is approximately 6 feet at ARC-109. 6. Significant Modifications of Monitoring Program Since the Last Status Report: 310 CMR 40.0892(2)b There were no significant modifications of the monitoring program for the period of November 2012 to May 2013. 7. Evaluation of Performance of the Remedy and Conditions or Problems Noted During Monitoring Program: 310CMR 40.0892(2)c 7.1 Measured LNAPL Thickness and Recovery Evaluation

An evaluation of LNAPL thicknesses measured from May 2006 through May 2013 indicates that there is generally an inverse relationship between groundwater elevation and apparent LNAPL thickness in wells (e.g., lowering water elevation leads to increasing LNAPL thicknesses and vice versa). As groundwater elevations fall due to decreased precipitation, as typically occurs during the late Summer and early Fall, LNAPL is observed to drain from the pore spaces in the surrounding soil into the wells. This results in increased LNAPL thickness and recovery during the period. When an increase in groundwater elevation occurs, as typically occurs at the end of the Fall into the Winter/Spring reporting period, LNAPL is submerged below the groundwater table. The elevated groundwater table immobilizes submerged LNAPL, resulting in reduced LNAPL drainage and therefore reduced LNAPL thicknesses observed in monitoring wells. The diagram in Appendix C depicts the reasons for LNAPL accumulation in a well at lower water table levels. The diagram is adapted from a training slide commonly used by the ITRC LNAPL team. ARCADIS has compiled graphs for individual wells comparing groundwater elevations to measured LNAPL thicknesses. These graphs are presented in Appendix D. The maximum LNAPL thicknesses measured at the Site were observed in ARC-109. The cross section presented in Figure 4 compares groundwater elevations at the Site in May 2012 and December 2012 as described in Section 4. ARCADIS attributes relatively high LNAPL thicknesses in ARC-109 to the formation conditions described previously. It is expected that LNAPL recovery will be greater at exterior wells in the next reporting period because the wells will not be covered with snow banks, and the lower groundwater table expected should facilitate LNAPL draining from the smear zone.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

7

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

The following table provides a summary of LNAPL recovery at the Site from well MW-14, and from the wells outside the source area, as compared to the total recovered LNAPL.

Reporting Period 5/06-11/06 11/06-5/07 5/07-11/07 11/07-5/08 5/08-11/08 11/08-5/09 5/09-11/09 11/09-5/10 5/10-11/10 11/10-5/11 5/11-11/11 11/11-5/12 5/12-11/12 11/12-5/13

Maximum LNAPL Thickness at MW-14 (feet) 2.00 1.24 1.19 1.13 1.30 1.40 0.52 1.10 0.57 0.80 1.31 0.91 0.83 1.95

Minimum LNAPL Thickness at MW-14 (feet) 0.30 0.45 0.27 0.05 0.12 0.05 0.09 0.15 0.06 0.43 0.56 0.40 0.22 0.34

Average LNAPL Thickness at MW-14 (feet) 1.40 0.89 0.64 0.59 0.52 0.39 0.27 0.42 0.30 0.61 0.78 0.70 0.47 0.94

Total LNAPL Recovered (May 2006 to May 2013)

LNAPL Recovered from MW-14 (gallons) 2,150 2,075 693 576 106 101 10 10 11 8 8 8 6 8

LNAPL Recovered from Site (gallons) 2,366 2,112 726 587 117 104 14 16 20 11 12 19 22 24

LNAPL Recovered from exterior Site wells (gallons) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 11 5

5,770

6,150

22

~ = Exterior product recovery wells not installed. Approximately 6,150 gallons of LNAPL has been recovered at the Site since May 2006. The following presents a summary of pertinent statistics regarding LNAPL recovery at the Site: 

Approximately 94 percent of LNAPL recovered at the Site has been recovered from MW-14.



Approximately 73 percent of LNAPL recovered from the Site occurred in the first year of recovery (May 2006 through May 2007).



Approximately 94 percent of LNAPL recovery occurred from May 2006 through May 2008.



Approximately 138 gallons of LNAPL have been recovered since May 2009, which equals approximately 2 percent of total recovery.



The LNAPL recovery of 24 gallons during the current reporting period includes 19 gallons from monitoring wells outside the building and 5 gallons from monitoring wells inside the building.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

8

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA



Product recovery from wells inside the footprint of the building has been enhanced through recovery from well MW-16D, which is drilled into the top of shallow bedrock. Approximately 5 gallons of LNAPL was recovered from MW-16D during the current reporting period.



The LNAPL recovery from exterior monitor wells over the last three reporting periods is approximately 32 percent of total recovery from the Site.

ARCADIS has compiled a graph of the cumulative LNAPL recovery and the LNAPL recovery per individual gauging event since May 2006 for monitor wells located in the source area. This graph is provided in Appendix E. This graph indicates that LNAPL recovery at the Site has been stable since early 2009. Approximately 138 gallons of LNAPL have been recovered from the Site since 2009, which accounts for 2 percent of total LNAPL recovery of the last 7 years. As stated previously, LNAPL recovery during the current reporting period was enhanced through recovery at wells outside the source area, namely ARC-109 and MW-16D. Site wide LNAPL recovery during the last 3 reporting periods ranged from 19 gallons to 24 gallons per sixmonth reporting period. Investigations conducted to date indicate that recoverable LNAPL is present in the formation, but may be approaching de minimis levels, particularly at those wells outside the building. Continued gauging and product recovery events will be conducted monthly at the Site over the next reporting period. This frequency could change based on seasonal conditions, the recovery volumes, and Site conditions. Gauging events will include all accessible wells in the monitoring well network to verify that the LNAPL recoverability is still relatively small, and LNAPL is not migrating beyond the DSB. ARCADIS also intends to conduct a review of feasible remedial options for the Site. As indicated previously, LNAPL recovery has been stable at the Site over the last four years. ARCADIS will review remedial options to evaluate if LNAPL recovery can be increased, or conducted more efficiently. The multiple lines of evidence evaluated, including baildown testing, LNAPL recovery, and Site history indicate that the majority of recoverable LNAPL may be located beneath the Site building. Even though the product recovery has diminished, the remedial actions continue to remove and reduce the LNAPL in the subsurface at the Site. Therefore, product recovery continues and the affected area represented by the DSB is stable and not expanding. 7.2

Sampling and Screening

A groundwater sampling event was conducted in May 2013. Laboratory analytical results will be included in the next semi-annual status report.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

9

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

7.3 Changes to Remedial Operation and Maintenance

Investigation activities conducted during the current reporting have delineated the extent of the LNAPL area. The following changes are planned for the remedial program over the next reporting period: 

ARCADIS intends to conduct a review of feasible remedial alternatives to enhance remediation at the Site. The findings of this review will be included in the next status report.



As noted previously, monthly gauging and product recovery events will be conducted at the Site over the next reporting period. This frequency could change based on the recovery volumes and Site conditions.

8. Description of Measures taken to Correct Conditions/ Affecting the Remedy: 310 CMR 40.0892(2)d No problems or conditions were noted during the current reporting period that will affect the function of the remedy. 9. Parties Performing Monitoring Activities, Materials Handling and Permits ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 194 Forbes Road Braintree, Massachusetts 02184 (781) 356-7300 Project Manager and LSP: Mr. Allen R. Walker, LSP, PE and Budd Batchelder, Task Manager (Cell Phones # 617-908-7257 and 617-908-0528, respectively) Monitoring activities are being conducted for: Lightolier- A Philips Group Brand, Fall River Mr. Raymond Larkin Philips Electronics North America- Environmental Affairs 9 Hawthorne Court North Kingstown, RI (401) 294-0434

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

10

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

9.1 Materials Handling

Recovered LNAPL is stored on Site in labeled DOT liquid drums inside the Lightolier hazardous waste storage building. These drums are periodically transported by United Oil Recovery, Incorporated to their facility in Meriden, Connecticut under manifest in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0030. The expended hydrophobic socks are treated under the “one-drop” rule. “The Paint Filter Liquids Test (310 CMR 30.156) is the method for determining whether oil/sorptive mineral mixtures pass the one-drop test. For industrial wipers, the one-drop determination shall be made by ‘wringing’ the rags out by hand or by some other mechanical compaction method. If it is apparent that the industrial wipers or sorptive minerals are non-saturated, testing may not be necessary, though generators remain responsible for proving that their waste can pass the one drop test.” The MassDEP provides the following guidance on the applicability of the mixture rule, M.G.L. Chapter 21C, 310 CMR 30.140 (1)(c), to sorptive minerals and industrial wipers that do not contain free-flowing waste oil and are therefore non-saturated. It is MassDEP's position that oily, non-saturated, industrial wipers and sorptive minerals do not typically pose a significant threat to human health when managed properly and that this policy provides a sufficient degree of environmental protection. The spent absorbents are disposed as normal facility trash. 9.2 Permits

There are no permits required, but Section 9.1 above provides MassDEP requirements regarding the handling of the recovered LNAPL. 10. The Name, License Number, Signature and Seal of the LSP: 310 CMR 40.0892(2)e Allen Walker is the LSP (#6894) for this Site and his signature and seal are provided in the BWSC-108 Transmittal form submitted electronically to eDEP. Following the electronic filing, the BWSC-108 transmittal form and confirmation of the electronic submittal will be included as Appendix B. Notification regarding the submittal and availability of this report has been provided to the Fall River Chief Municipal Officer and Board of Health as required. Copies of the notification letters are included in Appendix F.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

11

Remedy Operation Status (ROS) Inspection & Monitoring Report 631 Airport Road Fall River, MA

11. References 1. American Petroleum Institute Interactive LNAPL Guide Version 2.0., 2004 2. Mercer, J. W. and Cohen, R.M., 1990. A Review of Immiscible Fluids in the Subsurface: Properties, Models, Characterization and Remediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, Vol. 6, pp. 107-163. 3. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2009. Evaluating Natural Source Zone Depletion at Sites with LNAPL. 4. Bouwer and Rice, 1976. A Slug Test Method For Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Unconfined Aquifers With Completely or Partially Penetrating Wells. Water Resources Resarch, Vol 12, No. 3, pp. 423-428. 6. Jacob and Lohman, 1952. Nonsteady Flow to a Well of Constant Drawdown in an Extensive Aquifer. Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 33, pp. 559-569. 7. Cooper, Bredehoeft, and Papadopulos, 1967. Response of a Finite Diameter Well to an Instantaneous Charge of Water. Water Resources Research, Vol 3, pp. 263-269.

BN030015.0001_rpt_ROS Status_July152013.doc:jc

12

Figures

Tables

Table 1- Summary of Product Thickness and Recovery 631 Airport Road, Fall River, Massachusetts RTN 4-16359

Number of Gauging Events

Number of Events with Product Observed

Maximum Observed Product Thickness (feet)

Average Observed Product Thickness (feet)

Site

Total Product Recovery This Period (gallons)

Total Product Recovery From May 2006- May 2013

24

6,140

MW-3

8

4

0.18

0.06

0.55

3.55

MW-11

8

6

0.04

0.01

0.14

244.5

MW-12

8

0

0

0

0.00

2

MW-13

8

8

0.82

0.29

2.92

56.92

MW-14

8

8

1.95

0.83

8.33

5,765

MW-15

8

2

0.5

0.06

0.55

0.65

MW-16

8

6

0.37

0.11

1.05

12.05

MW-16D

8

8

0.91

0.54

5.35

5.70

MW-17

8

0

0

0

0.00

30

ARC-101

8 8 6 6 8 8

0 1 1 6 3 2

0 0.01 0.12 4.36 0.25 0.02

0 0 0.1 2.67 0.05 0.01

0.00 0.00 0.07 5.05 0.03 0.01

0.01 0.25 0.22 18.09 0.227 0.01

ARC-102 ARC-104 ARC-109 ARC-110 ARC-115

Note: 1. Only wells with LNAPL recovery to date included in table

Page 1 of 1

ARCADIS U.S., Inc.

Appendix A

Limitations & Service Constraints

Limitations and Service Constraints The opinions, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are limited to the information obtained during the performance of the specific scope of service identified in the report. To the extent that ARCADIS relied upon any information prepared by other parties not under direct contract to ARCADIS, no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information is made. This report is an instrument of professional service and the services described in the report were performed in accordance with generally accepted standards and level of skill and care ordinarily exercised by members of the profession working under similar conditions including comparable budgetary and schedule constraints. No warranty, guarantee or certification express or implied, is intended or given with respect to ARCADIS’s services, opinions, conclusions or recommendations. This statement is in lieu of any other statement either expressed or implied. ARCADIS’s observations, the results of testing and ARCADIS’s opinions, conclusions and recommendations apply solely to conditions existing at the specific times when and specific locations where ARCADIS’s investigative work was performed. Observation and testing activities such as those conducted by ARCADIS are inherently limited and do not represent a conclusive or complete characterization. Conditions in other parts of the project site, building or area may vary from conditions at the specific locations where observations were made and where testing was performed by ARCADIS. Additionally, other building material hazards which were not identified by ARCADIS, such as asbestos, lead-based paint and unidentified microbial impacts, may also be present in the indoor air, un-accessed areas and in walls, ceilings, cavities and floors. Therefore, the extent of ARCADIS’s opinions, conclusions and recommendations are limited and 100% confidence in these opinions, conclusions and recommendations cannot reasonably be achieved. Nothing contained in this report shall relieve any other party of its responsibility to abide by contract documents and applicable laws, codes, regulations, or standards nor shall it be considered medical advice or consultation. This report may document whether work conducted by ARCADIS, under contract to ARCADIS or under ARCADIS’s observation was done so in accordance with applicable regulatory standards. In the absence of standards such as is often the case for microbial assessment and abatement, this report may not be construed as providing clearance, approval, or authorization for use or re-occupancy of a given structure. Actual site conditions and quantities should be field verified and unless expressly stated, this report may not be used as a bid specification. Although an attempt may have been made to locate microbial growth (mold) and indoor air quality issues, in many cases only further investigation or full demolition procedures will reveal sources or impacted materials. In addition, the passage of time including the nominal passage of time may result in a change in the characteristics at the project site. This report is expressly for the sole and exclusive use of the party for whom this report was originally prepared and for the particular purpose outlined in the report. Only the party for whom this report was originally prepared and/or other specifically named parties have the right to make use of and rely upon this report. Reuse of this report or any portion thereof for other than its intended purpose, or if modified, or if used by third parties, shall be at the user’s sole risk.

Appendix B

MassDEP Transmittal Form

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT

BWSC108 Release Tracking Number

4

- 16359

Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484 (Subpart D) and 40.0800 (Subpart H) A. SITE LOCATION: 1. Site Name: LIGHTOLIER 2. Street Address:

631 AIRPORT RD

3. City/Town: FALL RIVER

4. ZIP Code:

✔ 5. Check here if a Tier Classification Submittal has been provided to DEP for this disposal site. a. Tier IA

b. Tier IB

c. Tier IC

✔

d. Tier II

6. If applicable, provide the Permit Number:

B. THIS FORM IS BEING USED

(check all that apply)

1. Submit a Phase I Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484. 2. Submit a Revised Phase I Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484. 3. Submit a Phase II Scope of Work, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0834. 4. Submit an interim Phase II Report. This report does not satisfy the response action deadline requirements in 310 CMR 40.0500. 5. Submit a final Phase II Report and Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0836. 6. Submit a Revised Phase II Report and Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0836. 7. Submit a Phase III Remedial Action Plan and Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0862. 8. Submit a Revised Phase III Remedial Action Plan and Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0862. 9. Submit a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0874. 10. Submit a Modified Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0874. 11. Submit an As-Built Construction Report, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0875. 12. Submit a Phase IV Status Report, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0877. 13. Submit a Phase IV Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0878 and 40.0879. Specify the outcome of Phase IV activities: (check one) a. Phase V Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring of the Comprehensive Remedial Action is necessary to achieve a Response Action Outcome. b. The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report (BWSC104) will be submitted to DEP. c. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report (BWSC104) has been or will be submitted to DEP. d. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. Further Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring of the remedial action is necessary to ensure that conditions are maintained and that further progress is made toward a Permanent Solution. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report (BWSC104) has been or will be submitted to DEP.

Revised: 4/1/2009

Page 1 of 5

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup

BWSC108 Release Tracking Number

COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT

4

- 16359

Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484 (Subpart D) and 40.0800 (Subpart H) B. THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO (cont.):(check all that apply) 14. Submit a Revised Phase IV Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0878 and 40.0879.

✔ 15. Submit a Phase V Status Report, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0892. ✔

16. Submit a Remedial Monitoring Report. (This report can only be submitted through eDEP.) a. Type of Report: (check one)

i. Initial Report ✔

ii. Interim Report

iii. Final Report

b. Frequency of Submittal: (check all that apply) i. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted monthly to address an Imminent Hazard. ii. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted monthly to address a Condition of Substantial Release Migration.

✔

iii. A Remedial Monitoring Report(s) submitted concurrent with a Status Report.

c. Status of Site: (check one)

i. Phase IV

ii. Phase V

d. Number of Remedial Systems and/or Monitoring Programs:

✔

iii. Remedy Operation Status

iv. Class C RAO

1

A separate BWSC108A, CRA Remedial Monitoring Report, must be filled out for each Remedial System and/or Monitoring Program addressed by this transmittal form. 17. Submit a Remedy Operation Status, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893. 18. Submit a Status Report to maintain a Remedy Operation Status, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(2). 19. Submit a Transfer and/or a Modification of Persons Maintaining a Remedy Operation Status (ROS) , pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(5) (check one, or both, if applicable). a. Submit a Transfer of Persons Maintaining an ROS (the transferee should be the person listed in Section D, "Person Undertaking Response Actions"). b. Submit a Modification of Persons Maintaining an ROS (the primary representative should be the person listed in Section D, "Person Undertaking Response Actions"). c. Number of Persons Maintaining an ROS not including the primary representative: 20. Submit a Termination of a Remedy Operation Status, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(6).(check one) a. Submit a notice indicating ROS performance standards have not been met. A plan and timetable pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0893(6)(b) for resuming the ROS are attached. b. Submit a notice of Termination of ROS. 21. Submit a Phase V Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0894. Specify the outcome of Phase V activities: (check one) a. The requirements of a Class A Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement (BWSC104) will be submitted to DEP. b. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. No additional Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring is necessary to ensure the integrity of the Response Action Outcome. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report (BWSC104) will be submitted to DEP. c. The requirements of a Class C Response Action Outcome have been met. Further Operation, Maintenance or Monitoring of the remedial action is necessary to ensure that conditions are maintained and/or that further progress is made toward a Permanent Solution. A completed Response Action Outcome Statement and Report (BWSC104) will be submitted to DEP. 22. Submit a Revised Phase V Completion Statement, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0894. 23. Submit a Post-Class C Response Action Outcome Status Report, pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0898. Revised: 4/1/2009

Page 2 of 5

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT

BWSC108 Release Tracking Number

4

- 16359

Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484 (Subpart D) and 40.0800 (Subpart H) C. LSP SIGNATURE AND STAMP: I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with this transmittal form, including any and all documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of (i) the standard of care in 309 CMR 4.02(1), (ii) the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2) and (3), and 309 CMR 4.03(2), and (iii) the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(3), to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, > if Section B indicates that a Phase I, Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV or Phase V Completion Statement and/or a Termination of a Remedy Operation Status is being submitted, the response action(s) that is (are) the subject of this submittal (i) has (have) been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii) is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, and (iii) comply(ies) with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B indicates that a Phase II Scope of Work or a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan is being submitted, the response action(s) that is (are) the subject of this submittal (i) has (have) been developed in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii) is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, and (iii) comply(ies) with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this submittal; > if Section B indicates that an As-Built Construction Report, a Remedy Operation Status, a Phase IV, Phase V or Post-Class C RAO Status Report, a Status Report to Maintain a Remedy Operation Status, a Transfer or Modification of Persons Maintaining a Remedy Operation Status and/or a Remedial Monitoring Report is being submitted, the response action(s) that is (are) the subject of this submittal (i) is (are) being implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii) is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set forth in the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, and (iii) comply(ies) with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this submittal. I am aware that significant penalties may result, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, if I submit information which I know to be false, inaccurate or materially incomplete. 1. LSP #:

6894

2. First Name:

3. Last Name: WALKER

ALLEN R

4. Telephone: (781) 356-7300

5. Ext.:

6. FAX:

7. Signature: 8. Date:

9. LSP Stamp: (mm/dd/yyyy)

Signed copy electronically transmitted to eDEP Transaction # 574655

Revised: 4/1/2009

Page 3 of 5

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup

BWSC108 Release Tracking Number

COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT

4

- 16359

Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484 (Subpart D) and 40.0800 (Subpart H) D. PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTIONS:

✔ a. change in contact name

1. Check all that apply: 2. Name of Organization: 3. Contact First Name: 5. Street:

LIGHTOLIER - FALL RIVER

RAY

4. Last Name:

631 AIRPORT RD

7. City/Town:

6. Title:

FALL RIVER

10. Telephone:

c. change in the person undertaking response actions

b. change of address

(401) 294-0434

8. State: 11. Ext.:

LARKIN

SR. PROJECT MANAGER

MA

a. Owner

✔ e. Other RP or PRP

b. Operator

02720-0000

12. FAX:

E. RELATIONSHIP TO SITE OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTIONS: 1. RP or PRP

9. ZIP Code:

c. Generator

Check here to change relationship d. Transporter

Specify: NON-SPECIFIED PRP

2. Fiduciary, Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21E, s. 2) 3. Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way (as defined by M.G.L. c. 21E, s. 5(j)) 4. Any Other Person Undertaking Response Actions

Specify Relationship:

F. REQUIRED ATTACHMENT AND SUBMITTALS: 1. Check here if the Response Action(s) on which this opinion is based, if any, are (were) subject to any order(s), permit(s) and/or approval(s) issued by DEP or EPA. If the box is checked, you MUST attach a statement identifying the applicable provisions thereof. 2. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the submittal of any

✔ Phase Reports to DEP.

3. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the availability of a Phase III Remedial Action Plan. 4. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of the availability of a Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan. 5. Check here to certify that the Chief Municipal Officer and the Local Board of Health have been notified of any field work involving the implementation of a Phase IV Remedial Action. 6. If submitting a Transfer of a Remedy Operation Status (as per 310 CMR 40.0893(5)), check here to certify that a statement detailing the compliance history for the person making this submittal (transferee) is attached. 7. If submitting a Modification of a Remedy Operation Status (as per 310 CMR 40.0893(5)), check here to certify that a statement detailing the compliance history for each new person making this submittal is attached. 8. Check here if any non-updatable information provided on this form is incorrect, e.g. Site Name. Send corrections to: [email protected].

✔ 9. Check here to certify that the LSP Opinion containing the material facts, data, and other information is attached.

Revised: 4/1/2009

Page 4 of 5

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE ACTION TRANSMITTAL FORM & PHASE I COMPLETION STATEMENT

BWSC108 Release Tracking Number

- 16359

4

Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0484 (Subpart D) and 40.0800 (Subpart H) G. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON UNDERTAKING RESPONSE ACTIONS: 1. I, , attest under the pains and penalties of perjury (i) that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal, including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form, (ii) that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material information contained in this submittal is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete, and (iii) that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for this submittal. I/the person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made am/is aware that there are significant penalties, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, inaccurate, or incomplete information. >if Section B indicates that this is a Modification of a Remedy Operation Status (ROS), I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I am fully authorized to act on behalf of all persons performing response actions under the ROS as stated in 310 CMR 40.0893(5)(d) to receive oral and written correspondence from MassDEP with respect to performance of response actions under the ROS, and to receive a statement of fee amount as per 4.03(3). I understand that any material received by the Primary Representative from MassDEP shall be deemed received by all the persons perform ing response actions under the ROS, and I am aware that there are significant penalties, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete information.

2. By:

3. Title: Signature

4. For: LIGHTOLIER - FALL RIVER (Name of person or entity recorded in Section D)

5. Date: (mm/dd/yyyy)

✔ 6. Check here if the address of the person providing certification is different from address recorded in Section D. 7. Street:

9 HAWTHORNE COURT

8. City/Town: NORTH KINGSTOWN 11. Telephone:

(401) 294-0434

9. State: 12. Ext.:

RI

10. ZIP Code:

02856-4646

13. FAX:

YOU ARE SUBJECT TO AN ANNUAL COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE FEE OF UP TO $10,000 PER BILLABLE YEAR FOR THIS DISPOSAL SITE. YOU MUST LEGIBLY COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS INCOMPLETE. IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM, YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING A REQUIRED DEADLINE. Date Stamp (DEP USE ONLY:)

Revised: 4/1/2009

Page 5 of 5

Appendix C

LNAPL Mobility Diagram

Appendix D

LNAPL Thickness & Groundwater Elevation Graphs

MW-3 Product Thickness Vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time

2.50

99.00

98.00

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

97.50

97.00

1.50

96.50

1.00

96.00

95.50

0.50

95.00

94.50

0.00 5/19/2006

94.00 12/13/2006

9/6/2007

5/8/2008

11/13/2008

5/15/2009

12/28/2009

Product Thickness

Groundwater elevation calculated utilizing ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

10/6/2010

1/19/2012

Corrected Groundwater Elevation

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

98.50

MW-11 Product Thickness vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

99.00

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

98.00

97.50

1.50

97.00

96.50

1.00

96.00

95.50

0.50

95.00

94.50

0.00 May-06

94.00 December-06

August-07

May-08

November-08

May-09

December-09

Groundwater elevation calculated utilizing ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'. Product Thickness

October-10

January-12

Corrected Groundwater Elevation

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

98.50

MW-12 Product Thickness Vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time

2.50

99.00

98.50

2.00

98.00

1.50

97.00

96.50

1.00

96.00

95.50

0.50

95.00

94.50

0.00 May-06

94.00 December-06

September-07

May-08

November-08

May-09

December-09

Product Thickness

October-10

January-12

Corrected Groundwater Elevation

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

97.50

MW-13 Product Thickness Vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 99.00

2.50

98.50

Product Thickness (ft.)

97.50

97.00

1.50

96.50

1.00

96.00

95.50

0.50

95.00

94.50

0.00 May-06

94.00 December-06

September-07

May-08

November-08

May-09

December-09

October-10

Product Thickness

Groundwater elevation calculated utilizing ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

January-12

Corrected Groundwater Elevation

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

98.00

2.00

MW-16 2.50

99.00

2.00

98.00

1.50

97.00

1.00

96.00

0.50

95.00

0.00 May-06

94.00 December-06

August-07

May-08

November-08

May-09

December-09

Product Thickness

Groundwater elevation calculated utilizing ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'

September-10

January-12

Corrected Groundwater Elevation

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

Product Thickness vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time

MW-14 Product Thickness Vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

99.00

98.50

Product Thickness (ft.)

97.50

97.00

1.50

96.50

96.00

1.00

95.50

95.00

0.50

94.50

94.00

0.00 05/19/06

12/7/2006

8/23/2007

5/2/2008

11/7/2008

5/7/2009

12/18/2009

10/6/2010

Product Thickness

Groundwater elevation calculated using ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'

1/19/2012

Corrected Groundwater Elevation

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

98.00

2.00

MW-15 Product Thickness Vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 1.00

96.00

95.60

95.40

95.20 0.50 95.00

94.80

94.60

94.40

0.00 May-06

94.20 November-06

August-07

April-08

October-08

May-09

November-09

September-10

Product Thickness

Groundwater elevation calculated utilizing ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'

March-12

Groundwater Elevation

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

95.80

MW-16D Product Thickness vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

99.00

98.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

97.00

96.00

1.50 95.00

94.00

1.00 93.00

92.00

0.50

91.00

0.00 February-12

90.00 May-12

August-12

November-12

Product Thickness (ft)

February-13

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

2.00

MW-17 2.50

99.00

2.00

98.00

1.50

97.00

1.00

96.00

0.50

95.00

0.00 May-06

94.00 December-06

September-07

May-08

November-08

May-09

December-09

October-10

Product Thickness

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

January-12

Corrected Groundwater Elevation

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

Product Thickness vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time

ARC-101 99.00

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

98.00

1.50

97.00

1.00

96.00

0.50

95.00

0.00 September-11

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

2.50

Product Thickness Vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time

94.00 February-12

August-12

Product Thickness (ft)

April-13

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft)

ARC-102 Product Thickness Vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

99.00

2.00

97.00

1.50 96.00

95.00

1.00

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

98.00

94.00

0.50 93.00

0.00 September-11

92.00 February-12

August-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated utilizing ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft)

ARC-104 Product Thickness vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

95.00

94.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

93.00

1.50 92.00

91.00

1.00

90.00

0.50 89.00

0.00 September-11

88.00 February-12

August-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

2.00

ARC-109 Product Thickness vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 5.00

93.00

4.50 92.00

91.00

3.50

3.00 90.00

2.50 89.00

2.00

1.50

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

4.00

88.00

1.00 87.00

0.50

0.00 December-11

86.00 June-12

January-13

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft)

ARC-110 Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Product Thickness Vs. Time 2.50

99.00

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

97.00

1.50 96.00

95.00

1.00

94.00

0.50 93.00

0.00 December-11

92.00 June-12

January-13

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

98.00

ARC-115 Product Thickness vs. Corrected Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

96.00

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

94.00

93.00

1.50

92.00

1.00 91.00

90.00

0.50

89.00

0.00

88.00 February-12

August-12

April-13

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

95.00

ARC-103 2.50

97.00

2.00

96.00

1.50

95.00

1.00

94.00

0.50

93.00

0.00 September-11

92.00 February-12

August-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time

ARC-105 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

99.00

98.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

96.00

95.00

1.50 94.00

93.00

1.00 92.00

91.00

0.50 90.00

89.00

0.00 September-11

88.00 February-12

August-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

97.00

2.00

ARC-106 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

95.00

94.00

93.00

1.50

Product Thickness (ft.)

92.00

91.00

1.00

90.00

0.50 89.00

0.00 September-11

88.00 March-12

September-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

May-13

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

2.00

ARC-107 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

95.00

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

93.00

1.50 92.00

91.00

1.00

90.00

0.50 89.00

0.00 September-11

88.00 February-12

August-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

94.00

ARC-108 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

94.00

93.00

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

92.00

91.00

1.50

90.00

1.00 89.00

88.00

0.50

87.00

0.00

86.00 January-12

July-12

February-13

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

ARC-111 2.50

98.00

2.00

97.00

1.50

96.00

1.00

95.00

0.50

94.00

0.00 December-11

93.00 March-12

June-12

September-12

January-13

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time

ARC-112 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

92.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

90.00

1.50

89.00

1.00 88.00

0.50 87.00

0.00

86.00 February-12

June-12

August-12

December-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

91.00

2.00

ARC-113 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 1.00

93.00

0.90

0.80

91.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

0.70

0.60 90.00

0.50 89.00

0.40

0.30

88.00

0.20 87.00

0.10

0.00

86.00 February-12

June-12

August-12

December-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Groundwater Elevation

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

92.00

ARC-114 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 1.00

94.00

0.90

0.80 92.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

0.70 91.00

0.60 90.00

0.50 89.00

0.40 88.00

0.30

87.00

0.20

86.00

0.10

0.00

85.00 February-12

June-12

August-12

December-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

93.00

ARC-116 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

94.00

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

92.00

91.00

1.50

90.00

1.00 89.00

88.00

0.50

87.00

0.00

86.00 February-12

June-12

August-12

December-12

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Corrected Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

93.00

ARC-117 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

97.00

96.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

95.00

94.00

1.50

93.00

1.00 92.00

91.00

0.50 90.00

0.00

89.00 April-12

July-12

October-12

February-13

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

Groundwater Elevation

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

2.00

ARC-118 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 2.50

97.00

2.00

Product Thickness (ft.)

95.00

1.50 94.00

93.00

1.00

92.00

0.50 91.00

0.00

90.00 April-12

May-12

June-12

August-12

August-12

October-12

November-12

January-13

Product Thickness (ft)

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

March-13

April-13

Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

96.00

ARC-119 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time

2.50

97.00

96.00

2.00

1.50 94.00

93.00

1.00

92.00

0.50 91.00

0.00

90.00 April-12

July-12

October-12

February-13

Product Thickness

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

Groundwater Elevation

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

95.00

ARC-120 Groundwater Elevation Vs. Time 97.00

96.00

0.50

95.00

0.00

94.00 April-12

May-12

May-12

June-12

June-12

July-12

August-12

October-12

March-13

Product Thickness

Groundwater elevation calculated in reference to ARCADIS survey with arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100'.

April-13

May-13

Groundwater Elevation

Groundwater Elevation (ft.)

Product Thickness (ft.)

1.00

Appendix E

Cumulative LNAPL Recovery GraphInterior Wells

1000.00

11/30/09 1/22/10 3/5/10 4/28/10 5/13/10 6/4/10 7/9/10 7/29/10 9/13/10 10/6/10 10/25/10 11/19/10 1/26/11 4/29/11 7/8/11 9/30/11 11/8/11 1/3/12 2/23/12 5/14/12 6/28/12 8/17/12 10/5/12 12/14/2012 3/13/2013 5/16/2013

5/15/09 6/4/09 6/26/09 7/16/09 8/6/09 8/28/09 9/25/09

5000.00 200.00

4000.00 150.00

3000.00 100.00

2000.00

Recovery Per Event

50.00

Cumulative Recovery

0.00 0.00

LNAPL Recovery Per Gauging Event (gallons)

8000.00

5/16/08 6/5/08 6/27/08 7/25/08 8/22/08 9/12/08 10/3/08 10/24/08 11/7/08 12/4/08 12/23/08 1/15/09 2/6/09 2/27/09 3/20/09 4/10/09

5/19/06 6/9/06 7/6/06 7/26/06 8/15/06 9/1/06 9/26/06 10/24/06 11/2/06 12/7/06 12/28/06 2/9/07 3/19/07 4/24/07 5/17/07 6/20/07 7/17/07 8/16/07 9/17/07 10/23/07 11/29/07 12/27/07 1/23/08 2/22/08 3/14/08 4/9/08

Cumulative LNAPL Recovery (gallons) 9000.00

Summary of Cumulative LNAPL Recovery Vs. Time Interior Wells Lightolier, Fall River, MA RTN 4‐16359 350.00

300.00

7000.00

250.00

6000.00

Appendix F

Notification Letters

ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 194 Forbes Road Braintree Massachusetts 02184 Tel 781.356.7300 Fax 781.356.2211

Mayor William A. Flanagan Fall River City Hall One Government Center, Room 619 Fall River, MA 02722 Subject:

www.arcadis-us.com

Phase V Status and Remedial Monitoring Report No. 12 Lightolier – A Phillips Group Brand 631 Airport Road Fall River, Massachusetts RTN # 4-16359

Dear Mayor Flanagan:

Date:

July 15, 2013 ARCADIS U.S., Inc. has prepared the above-referenced Phase V Status and Remedial Monitoring Report No. 12 for Release Tracking Number (RTN) 4-16359 for the above-referenced Site. The Site is also in Remedy Operation Status (ROS). This report was transmitted electronically to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) via eDEP (Transaction # 574655). The report is available at the MassDEP website:

Contact:

Budd Batchelder & Allen Walker Phone:

781-356-7300 Email:

http://public.dep.state.ma.us/SearchableSites2/Search.aspx

[email protected] & [email protected]

Please call Budd Batchelder or Allen Walker if there are any questions regarding this submittal at (781) 356-7300. Sincerely, ARCADIS U.S., Inc.

Budd Batchelder Project Scientist CC:

R. Larkin (PENA) R. Westgate (Lightolier) MassDEP- SERO

Imagine the result

Allen R. Walker, P.E., LSP Principal Environmental Engineer

Our ref: BN030015.0000

ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 194 Forbes Road Braintree Massachusetts 02184 Tel 781.356.7300 Fax 781.356.2211

Henry R. Vaillancourt, MD, MPH Fall River Board of Health One Government Center, Room 431 Fall River, MA 02722 Subject:

www.arcadis-us.com

Phase V Status and Remedial Monitoring Report No. 12 Lightolier – A Phillips Group Brand 631 Airport Road Fall River, Massachusetts RTN # 4-16359

Dear Mr. Vaillancourt:

Date:

July 15, 2013 ARCADIS U.S., Inc. has prepared the above-referenced Phase V Status and Remedial Monitoring Report No. 12 for Release Tracking Number (RTN) 4-16359 for the above-referenced Site. The Site is also in Remedy Operation Status (ROS). This report was transmitted electronically to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) via eDEP (Transaction # 574655). The report is available at the MassDEP website:

Contact:

Budd Batchelder & Allen Walker Phone:

781-356-7300 Email:

http://public.dep.state.ma.us/SearchableSites2/Search.aspx

[email protected] & [email protected]

Please call Budd Batchelder or Allen Walker if there are any questions regarding this submittal at (781) 356-7300. Sincerely, ARCADIS U.S., Inc.

Budd Batchelder Project Scientist CC:

R. Larkin (PENA) R. Westgate (Lightolier) MassDEP- SERO

Imagine the result

Allen R. Walker, P.E., LSP Principal Environmental Engineer

Our ref: BN030015.0000