IGCC Cleaner Coal Ready for Carbon Capture

GE Energy IGCC Cleaner Coal – Ready for Carbon Capture UBS 2007 Climate Change Conference May 14, 2007 Why Is Coal for Power Important? • High/vola...
Author: Jody Hardy
0 downloads 1 Views 937KB Size
GE Energy

IGCC Cleaner Coal – Ready for Carbon Capture UBS 2007 Climate Change Conference May 14, 2007

Why Is Coal for Power Important? • High/volatile natural gas prices • Availability of natural gas/LNG

GW 200

• Global Recoverable Reserves – Oil 40 yrs, NG 70 yrs, Coal 192 yrs

150

• Need for fuel diversity

>25% of World Power Generation Additions

100 50

• Energy security/independence concerns 0 ‘96

‘00

Coal Coal ‘04

‘08

‘12

The US’ most plentiful resource…

2004 US Total: 3,971 TWhr ~80 Proposed coal plants – 50 GW Source: GE power generation vertical forecast

Copyright General Electric Company

Coal 49.8% Source: EIA - Electric Report Annual Report, 2005

2/ GE / May 11, 2007

IGCC - Cleaner By Design Pollution Prevention

vs.

Pollution Control WESP Carbon Injection

Boiler SCR

Pre-Combustion PM, Hg, Su, CO2

ESP/ FF

FF FGD

CO2

IGCC

Pulverized Coal

• Gasification cleans the coal before it is burned. • High pressure & low volume provide favorable economics of pollutant removal • The IGCC Cleaner Coal option increases fuel diversity, reduces emissions, and increases siting and permitting flexibility.

• Pollutants are removed after the coal is burned. • The gas volume treated is 100 times the gas volume of an IGCC plant. • Criteria & HAPS emissions are higher than an average IGCC plant • Combustion produces large quantities of waste and consumes more water than IGCC

Copyright General Electric Company

3/ GE / May 11, 2007

IGCC: Emissions Approaching Natural Gas 0.16

PM10 SO2 NOx

Lb/MMBTU

0.15 0.10 0.05

0.04 0.03

50 90%

Best Individual Plant 0.017

0.00

90%+

Average Recent Permit Data

0.09

0.02 0.01 0.01

0.01

0.01 0.002

NGCC Advanced IGCC Source: GE internal data, average of 30 permits PC/SCPC granted, applications and publicly reported emissions

IGCC Environmental Benefits Versus Best in Class Supercritical Pulverized Coal • 33% less NOx • 75% less SOx • 40% less PM10

Hg % Captured

PC IGCC Hg 30-40% Less

PC IGCC Water Usage

• 90% + Hg removal • 30% less water • CO2 capture ready Copyright General Electric Company

4/ GE / May 11, 2007

GE’s Gasification & IGCC Experience Leadership • Gasification leader since 1948 with 62 facilities operating worldwide

GE’s Gasification Experience ~120 Vessels In Operation

• First coal gasification plant in 1978 • 21 gas turbines operating on synthesis gas, >1,000,000 operating hours

74

Plants Operating Plants in Design or Under Construction

• IGCC leader: >3 GW with GE technologies • >6 centuries team gasification experience

24

Total Plants on All Fuels

Copyright General Electric Company

Total Plants On Solid Fuels

5/ GE / May 11, 2007

IGCC Commercialization Coolwater Prototype 120MW

Commercial Demos Polk, Wabash 250MW

1984

2006

1995

The Solution The Solution

The IGCC Puzzle

• CAPEX too high • COE too high • No system guarantees or warrantees – only license • Poor Initial RAM

Reference Plant Commercially Offered 630MW

• GE gasification technology acquisition • GE and Bechtel IGCC Alliance • Turnkey, single source 630MW reference plant offering with guarantees & warranties • Rigorous New Product Introduction programs to lower cost and improve RAM Copyright General Electric Company

6/ GE / May 11, 2007

Segmentation and Targeting Led to 600 MW Bituminous Coal Launch Focus New Future Coal-Fired Power Plants

Proposed Fuels for New Plant Additions Petroleum Coke Eastern Bituminous Coal

PRB Coal Liquid Hydrocarbon

Proposed US Coal Plants 30 20 10 0 1,500 1,200 7/ GE / May 11, 2007

GE & Bechtel Alliance IGCC Reference Plant Reference plant design

Reference plant status

• Nominal 630MW net plant output • RSC and GT preliminary designs complete Dec ‘06 • 7FB gas turbine combined cycle system

• Fuel flexibility – Wide range of bituminous coals – Coal/coke blends

• Integration & plant performance models complete • Layout being optimized, MTOs underway • Cost estimates being finalized

Copyright General Electric Company

8/ GE / May 11, 2007

GE Growth Across Gasification Segments Power IGCC

Chemicals

CTL

Refining

Accelerating technology development 9 Partnering with industry leaders 9 Delivering commercial solutions 9

Copyright General Electric Company

9/ GE / May 11, 2007

CARBON

CO2 Production with Today’s Fuels World Average Existing Coal U.S. Average (33%) New Coal SCPC

45%

40%

IGCC with CCS 90% CC

60% CC

NGCC

Coal Natural Gas Thermal Efficiency Indicated (xx%) CC = Carbon Capture

60%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

CO2 Emission Rate (lbs/MW-hr) Copyright General Electric Company

11 / GE / May 11, 2007

Carbon Capture Technology Today

Pathways

CO2 $/MT1

Post-Combustion

•Amine Scrubbing

$401

Pre-Combustion

•IGCC

$191

Post-Combustion

Developing

Technologies

Pre-Combustion

•Oxy-Combustion

~$301

•Chilled Ammonia

--

•Chemical Looping

--

•Membranes O2/CO2//H2

--

•High efficiency shift

--

•Pre-mix H2 combustor

--

1 The Future of Coal, MIT 2007 Coal Energy Study, 12 / same technology basis

Copyright General Electric Company

GE / May 11, 2007

Carbon Removal…a Proven Process Oxygen, Feedstock Gasification

Water Gas Shift CO+H2O -> CO2+H2 Optional Shift

Slag

Proven Gasification •62 GE licensed gasification units operating worldwide •12 with solid feedstock

Diffusion Process Gas Only Combustor High P, Low Vol High Driving Force Diluent NOx Control AGR/SRU Hg

S

•8 with solid feedstock

Power

CO2

Proven Process Technology •25 GE licensed gasification units operating worldwide using shift reaction to produce H2

H2

•25 GE licensed units operating worldwide using AGR technology to remove CO2 from shifted syngas

Proven Turbines •25 GE gas turbines operating at 50%+ H2 •F-class combustion validation up to 90% H2

•8 with solid feedstock Copyright General Electric Company

13 / GE / May 11, 2007

Proven Gasification/CO2 Capture Plants Started

40

GE’s Operating Gasification Plants with CO2 Separation

35

Starts per year

30

Cumulative

Operating Plants

Construction

25

25 20 15 10 5 2015

2010

2005

2000

1995

1990

1985

1980

1975

1970

1965

0

Start Year

Gasification w/ CO2 Capture is over 50 yrs old

• First GE gasification plant w/ CO2 removal: Spencer Chemical, 1953 • 25 operating plants (8 solids) over last 40 years Copyright General Electric Company

14 / GE / May 11, 2007

Gasification Capture Experience Coal

Ammonia Hydrogen Methanol

Petcoke Coal/Petcoke Liquid Gas

Capture+Shift Equivalency to CC • Ammonia Plant => 90% CO2 Capture • Methanol Process => 70% CO2 Capture Copyright General Electric Company

15 / GE / May 11, 2007

Proven Hydrogen Turbines Site ExxonMobil Singapore Georgia Gulf SUV Vresova BASF/ Geismer Koch Refinery Daeson Korea Shell Int'l Reutgerswerke Tenerife Cartagena San Roque

Model MS6241FA MS7001EA MS9001E MS6001B MS6001B MS6001B MS5001P MS3002J MS6001B MS6000B MS6000B

No. Gas 2 IGCC 3 Blend 2 IGCC 1 PG 1 RFG 1 PG 1 RFG 1 PG 1 RFG 1 RFG 2 RFG

Features 44.5% H2 Methane+50% H2 46.8% H2 Up to 80% H2 12% to 50% H2 up to 95% H2 60% H2, propane 60% H2 ~70% H2 66% H2 70% H2

MS7001EA

WG=Waste Gas; RFG=Refinery Gas; Steel=COG+BFG; TG=Tail gas

MS6001B

Site Antwerpen Puertollano La Coruna Rotterdam AGIP/ Milazzo Cochin Refineries Mobil/ Paulsboro Uhde NUP Donges Zarqa Refinery Copyright General Electric Company

Model MS6000B MS6000B MS6000B MS6000B MS5001P MS5001P MS5001P MS3002J GE10 PGT10

No. 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1

Gas RFG RFG RFG RFG RFG RFG RFG TG RFG RFG

Features 78% H2 Up to 60% H2 Up to 52% H2 59% H2 30% to 50% H2 50% H2 20% to 60% H2 ~60% H2 76% H2 82% H2 16 / GE / May 11, 2007

F-Class Combustor - Proven for H2 • Diffusion flame technology • Diluent addition used to control NOx (N2 or steam) • Typically achieves 15ppm NOx (with diluent) • FA & FB combustion validation completed

Experience

MNQC Liner Cap

Diluent Control

Copyright General Electric Company

17 / GE / May 11, 2007

Storage

Pathways

Technologies

CO2 $/Ton

Geological

•Compression into oil & gas reserves, saline aquifers, or deep coal seams

Terrestrial

•Forest preservation •Algae •Microbes

Ocean

•Deep ocean injection •Hydrates for permanence

$5-10

$50 $120 NA $50

Cost = capture + storage + transport Copyright General Electric Company

18 / GE / May 11, 2007

Status of CO2 use for EOR in the US1 A lot has been safely done in the past. • Approximately 80 CO2-EOR projects: - Natural CO2 - 3000 miles of CO2 distribution pipelines in Permian Basin (U.S.) - Enhanced oil recovery efficiency ranges from 11 to 15% • Multiple oil reservoirs available for CO2-EOR. • CO2-EOR projects have been limited by CO2 quantity. 1

U.S. Dept. Of Energy (Feb. 2006)

Copyright General Electric Company

19 / GE / May 11, 2007

GE and BP Accelerating Low Carbon Power Generation Hydrogen Power Projects • Utilize advantaged fossil fuels (coal, petcoke) • Produce high H2 fuel gas to burn in gas turbines • Capture CO2 (~90%) • Utilize CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) • Future storage in Saline Aquifers

Carson Hydrogen Power Project

Value Through Collaboration • Combine technology company with an operations company • Leaders in gasification, power and CCS • 10+ projects over next decade • Carson, CA is first gasification project

Copyright General Electric Company

20 / GE / May 11, 2007

GE Product Development Strategy Models Coal Slurry Spray

Lab Tests

Field Tests

Materials

Injection Test

Validation Data

Metal

120

Temperature (ºF)

Coatings & Refractory

80

60

Gasification Kinetics

40 08/05/04 00:00

08/07/04 00:00

08/09/04 00:00

08/11/04 00:00

08/13/04 00:00

08/15/04 00:00

08/17/04 00:00

08/19/04 00:00

08/21/04 00:00

08/23/04 00:00

08/25/04 00:00

Field Optimization Slag Penetration

Gas Flow & Heat Recovery

100

“New” Material

“Old” Material

Cost, Reliability, Operability, Efficiency Copyright General Electric Company

21 / GE / May 11, 2007

GE’s Global IGCC Resources

GE Energy’s Gasification Business Headquarters Houston, TX

China Technology Center Shanghai, China

Global Research Center Headquarters Niskayuna, NY

Gas Turbine Manufacturing Sites Greenville, SC Belfort, France

Copyright General Electric Company

Europe Technology Center Munich, Germany

John F. Welch Technology Centre Bangalore, India 22 / GE / May 11, 2007

Summary • New coal capacity build depends on economic feasibility of carbon capture • IGCC with pre-combustion capture is proven and ready to provide low CO2 power from coal • IGCC provides the lowest avoided cost of CO2 capture today • Advances in gasification, separation and hydrogen combustion will maintain IGCC leadership for cleaner coal and with carbon capture and storage

Copyright General Electric Company

23 / GE / May 11, 2007

GE Energy

IGCC Cleaner Coal – Ready for Carbon Capture

Q&A

Suggest Documents