Identification of prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer

UPTEC X 05 008 FEB 2005 ISSN 1401-2138 GÖRAN RONQUIST Identification of prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer Master’s degree project Mole...
Author: Dulcie Blake
3 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
UPTEC X 05 008 FEB 2005

ISSN 1401-2138

GÖRAN RONQUIST

Identification of prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer

Master’s degree project

Molecular Biotechnology Programme Uppsala University School of Engineering

UPTEC X 05 008

Date of issue 2005-02-01

Author

Göran Ronquist Title (English)

Identification of prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer Title (Swedish) Abstract Molecular markers in serum are often used to monitor the development of cancer disease. This project aimed to identify prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer. Classical proteomics technologies were used; sample preparation, 2D-electrophoresis separation and mass spectrometry to identify separated proteins. In addition, Western blots were made to visualise the immunogenic antigens. A total amount of 25 immunogenic proteins were forwarded to mass spectrometric identification. Keywords Prostasomes, Prostate cancer, Autoantigens, Proteomics, Western blot Supervisors

Doctor Lena Carlsson Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Scientific reviewer

Professor Anders Larsson Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Project name

Sponsors

Language

Security

English Classification

ISSN 1401-2138 Supplementary bibliographical information

Pages

21 Biology Education Centre

Biomedical Center

Husargatan 3 Uppsala

Box 592 S-75124 Uppsala

Tel +46 (0)18 4710000

Fax +46 (0)18 555217

Identification of prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer Göran Ronquist Sammanfattning: Prostatacancer är vanligt förekommande bland äldre män i västvärlden. En tidigt upptäckt prostatacancer behandlas bäst genom kirurgiska ingrepp och patienten tillfrisknar i många fall. En sent upptäckt, metastaserande tumör leder till utdragen behandling och oftast till en för tidig död för patienten. Det är därför viktigt att förfoga över en bra diagnostisk metod som kan avgöra när en relativt godartad tumör övergår till ett mer elakartat tillstånd. Nuvarande markör, prostataspecifikt antigen (PSA) är inte prostatacancerspecifik och blir därför osäker och det medför en svårighet att avgöra tumörens status. I dagens samhälle med fler invånare som når en högre ålder (hög ålder är en stark riskfaktor för att drabbas av prostatacancer) kommer efterfrågan efter en bättre diagnosmetod att bli allt större. Prostasomer, små sekretoriska vesiklar som normalt finns i prostatakörtelns epitelceller, syntetiseras och frisätts även av metastaserande celler hos prostatacancerpatienter. Man har även kunnat påvisa att prostasomerna ger upphov till autoantikroppar i blodserum hos dessa patienter redan innan metastaser bildats. Detta projekt syftar till att identifiera några av de prostasomala antigen som är målproteiner för de prostasomautoantikroppar som bildas av prostatacancerpatienter och som uppträder i serum. Förhoppningen är att något av dessa antigener kan komma att användas som komplement till PSA-markören för en förfinad diagnostik av prostatacancer.

Examensarbete 20p, Molekylär bioteknikprogrammet Uppsala Universitet februari 2005

1

CONTENTS 1.INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

The prostasome ............................................................................................................... 3 Functional role of prostasomes ....................................................................................... 4 Prostasomes and prostate cancer ..................................................................................... 4 Proteomics ....................................................................................................................... 4

2. AIM OF THE STUDY .................................................................................... 5 3. MATERIAL AND METHODS...................................................................... 5 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8

Serum samples................................................................................................................. 5 Isolation of prostasomes.................................................................................................. 5 ELISA.............................................................................................................................. 5 1D-SDS-PAGE................................................................................................................ 6 1D-Western blotting........................................................................................................ 6 2D-electrophoresis .......................................................................................................... 6 2D-Western blot .............................................................................................................. 7 MALDI-TOF................................................................................................................... 8

4. RESULTS......................................................................................................... 8 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6

Purification of prostasomes ............................................................................................. 8 ELISA.............................................................................................................................. 9 1D-electrophoresis .......................................................................................................... 9 1D-Western blot ............................................................................................................ 10 2D-electrophoresis ........................................................................................................ 13 2D-Western blot ............................................................................................................ 15

5. DISCUSSION.............................................................................................. 18 6. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES ........................................................................ 18 7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................... 19 8. REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 20

2

ABBREVIATIONS CD

CHAPS ELISA IgG Ip IPG-strip kDa MALDI-TOF MW PSA

PSMA PAP

SDS-PAGE Swim up media

Cluster of differentiation. By convention, leukocyte cell surface molecules are named systematically by assigning them a cluster of differentiation (CD) antigen number that includes any antibody having an identical and unique reactivity pattern with different leukocyte populations. 3-[(3-Cholamidopropyl)dimethylamino]-1propanesulfonate, a zwitterionic detergent used as a component in 2D buffer. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Immunoglobulin G. Isoelectric point. Immobilized pH-gradient strip, used for first dimensionseparation in 2D-gel separation of proteins. kiloDalton. Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-offlight, a mass spectrometric metod to determine peptide sequences. Molecular weight. Prostate-specific antigen. A protein (enzyme) produced by the prostate epithelial cells that may be found in an increased amount in serum of men who have prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or infection or inflammation of the prostate. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen, a PSA-like protein in the membrane of the prostate epithelial cells. Prostatic acid phosphatase, an enzyme hydrolysing phosphate esters produced by the prostate epithelial cells. It may be found in increased amounts in serum in men who have prostate cancer. Sodium dodecyl sulphate- PolyAcrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. Differently designed media to select the most viable sperm cells.

3

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The prostasome Prostasomes were discovered in Uppsala during the late 1970´s [1]. They are small, membrane-surrounded vesicles produced and secreted by the epithelial cells of the human prostate gland and are present in high amounts in normal semen (Fig 1). The vesicles are usually surrounded by a lipid bilayered membrane and they have a mean diameter of 150 nm, but with large variation of size [2]. Small spherical particles of approximately 15 nm in diameter can be seen in the cytosol. In the prostate gland, prostasomes are mostly encased in bigger storage vesicles together with electron dense material [3]. The prostasomes may thereby be released as small intact vesicles in the prostatic fluid (and semen) by an ordinary exocytosis between the membrane surrounding the storage vesicle and the plasma membrane of the prostatic secretory cells [3]. This release is thought to be hormone-dependent [4]. The membranes of these vesicles are complex and they have an unusually high cholesterol/phospholipid ratio [5].

1cm = 125nm

Fig 1. Transmission electron microscopy of seminal prostasomes that vary in size (range 40-500nm). The bilayered membrane and the small spherical particles (15 nm) are seen within the prostasome (arrow). Mag x 80 000. (Published with courtesy by Lena Carlsson).

4

1.2 Functional role of prostasomes Prostasomes have many different biologic activities, but their physiologic role is still unclear. They seem to have an important role in the fertilization process and studies have shown that they can adhere to and, at least to some extent, fuse with sperm cells. Further, immunostaining demonstrated that washed spermatozoa incubated with prostasomes in vitro are coated with prostasomes [6]. Several studies have shown that they promote forward motility of washed sperm cells [7]. By inclusion in swim-up media, a medium designed to select the viable sperms, they enhance the recruitment of motile spermatozoa [8]. Recently, prostasomes have been shown also to possess an antibacterial effect on certain bacteria [9]. The prostasomes have an immunosuppressive and complementinhibitory activity in seminal fluid and may thereby protect spermatozoa from damaging effects from phagocytosing cells [10]. 1.3 Prostasomes and prostate cancer Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer among men in the Nordic countries [11]. More than 25% of the diagnosed cancer cases are prostate cancer [12]. The number of men with prostate cancer has increased during the last decade, due to an increasing age of the population. Currently, PSA (prostate specific antigen) is the most sensitive and clinically useful tumour marker for prostate cancer, both in diagnosing and monitoring the prostate cancer patient. However, the deficient specificity for prostate cancer is inherent in the PSA assay, since PSA is rather organ-specific but not cancer-specific. This tends to limit the clinical utility of PSA testing [13]. Accordingly, there is a need for supplementation of the PSA test to differentiate prostate cancer from benign diseases of the prostate and to predict which cancers will become aggressive [14]. Prostate cancer cells express tissue-specific antigens, including PSA, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). Several epitopic peptides of these antigens have been identified [15]. In addition, prostate cancer cells are capable of synthesizing and releasing prostasomes [16]. A previous pilot study proved the presence of serum autoantibodies against prostasomes in patients having prostate cancer and a serum PSA value of 50µg/L or more [17]. Furthermore, an inverse relationship was established between antiprostasome autoantibody titre in serum and outcome of prostate cancer in terms of metastases to lymph nodes and the skeleton [18]. 1.4 Proteomics The term ”Proteome” was introduced and first used in 1995 (PROTEin complement to a genOME). A cellular proteome is an assembly of proteins found in a particular cell type under specified environmental conditions. Proteomics is used as a tool in the study of the proteome. Classical proteomics technologies involve sample preparation, 2D-electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, to separate and identify particular proteins. In October 2004, researchers of the human genome project estimated the number of genes in the human genome to 20.000-25.000. Researchers of the human proteome project estimate the number of proteins to be more than 200.000. The large protein diversity is thought to be brought about by post-translational modifications of the proteins. A

5 proteomic analysis of human prostasomes was carried out 2003 revealing 139 of the proteins subdivided in 6 different categories: 1. enzymes (34 % of total); 2. transport/structural (19 %); 3. GTP proteins (14%); 4. chaperone proteins (6 %); 5. signal transduction proteins (17 %) and 6. unannotated proteins (10%) [19].

2. AIM OF THE STUDY The aim of this study was to isolate prostasomal proteins and to identify prostasomal autoantigens recognized by autoantibodies in serum from patients with prostate cancer by using classical protein techniques.

3. MATERIAL AND METHODS 3.1 Serum samples Eighthundred and seventyeight (878) blood sera from patients with prostate cancer diagnosis (unknown aggressiveness of the tumour), were investigated regarding titre of prostasome antibodies. These serum samples were obtained from Karolinska institute, Stockholm and were stored at -75°C for not more than 2 and half years before use. 3.2 Isolation of prostasomes Prostasomes were isolated and purified from seminal plasma obtained from the Fertility centre at Uppsala University Hospital. Semen samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 1000 g to remove spermatozoa and other cells from the seminal plasma and then ultracentrifuged at 10 000 g for 15 min +4°C to remove possible cell debris. The supernatant was subsequently subjected to another ultracentrifugation for 2 h at 100 000 g to pellet the prostasomes. The prostasomes were resuspended in 30 mmol/L Tris-HCl, containing 130 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.6 (isotonic Tris-HCl buffer). This suspension was further purified on a Sephadex G 200 column, equilibrated with the isotonic Tris-HCl buffer (flow rate 6mL/h), to separate the prostasomes from an amorphous substance [20]. Isotonic Tris-HCl buffer was used as eluent, and the eluate was monitored at 260 (due to nucleic acid content of prostasomes) and 280 nm. Fractions with elevated UV absorbances were collected and analysed for aminopeptidase N activity, a marker enzyme for prostasomes [21]. Ultraviolet-absorbing fractions with high aminopeptidase N activity (611) were pooled and ultracentrifuged at 100 000 g for 2 h. The pellet representing the “purified prostasomes” was resuspended in the isotonic Tris-HCl buffer and adjusted to a protein concentration of 2 mg/mL using a Protein Assay ESL method (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). 3.3 ELISA A first selection, out of the 878 blood sera with a high titre of antiprostasome antibodies, was done by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), developed by Carlsson and coworkers [22]. Wells in the ELISA microtitre plates were coated with 4 µg of purified prostasomes over night. After that the following measures were taken: 1) 100 µL primary antibodies (patient’s blood sera samples, diluted 1:50), 2) Bovine serum albumin (3% BSA, blocking unspecific bindings), 3) Secondary antibodies (purchased IgG anti-

6 antibodies, diluted 1:1000) with the enzyme horseradish peroxidase conjugated, 4) Substrate (tetramethyl benzidine), was added, with additional washing steps in-between. The substrate reaction was stopped by adding 1.8 mol/L sulphuric acid and the amount of primary antibodies bound was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm in an ELISA reader system (SPECTRA Max 250). For each one of the blood sera samples a factor value was calculated relative a positive and negative control obtained from Immunsystem AB (Uppsala, Sweden). The factor value was defined as the quota: Factor= (A450 patients serum sample - A450 negative control)/ (A450 positive control - A450 negative control) Fortyfour patient sera with factor values between 1.141 and 4.047 were chosen for 1D and 2D investigation. 3.4 1D-SDS-PAGE Purified prostasome proteins (0.25mg/mL) were denatured by SDS sample buffer (70°C, 10 min) and electrophoretically separated by weight on a 4-12% gradient polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were visualized by colloidal blue staining. 3.5 1D-Western blotting After SDS-PAGE, the proteins were electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was washed and incubated over night with patient sera (primary antibodies, diluted 1:30). Next day, the membrane was blocked with 1% BSA, incubated first with biotinylated anti-human IgG (diluted 1:500) and thereafter with streptavidin alkaline phosphatase (diluted 1:1000), and visualized by NBT (Nitro-Blue Tetrazolium Chloride) BCIP (5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3'-Indolyphosphate p-Toluidine Salt) substrate. Between every step additional washings were performed. The 13 best sera, with the most distinct and clear bands were chosen for 2D-electrophoresis. 3.6 2D-electrophoresis The purified prostasomes were precipitated and solubilized in a solution containing 8 mol/L urea, 4% CHAPS (a zwitterionic detergent), 40 mmol/L Tris, 0.2% (w/v) IPG (immobilized pH-gradient) buffer 3-10 for 1 h at 4°C and ultrasonicated on ice for 1.5 min, 40 KHz. The extraction was then ultracentrifuged (4°C for 2 h) at 100 000 x g. Extracted proteins in the supernatant were collected and analyzed for their protein concentration. First dimension separation was performed on ReadyStrip™ IPG-strip. Prostasome proteins (2mg/mL) soluted in equilibration buffer were passively rehydrated to a ReadyStrip™ IPG-strip over night. Next day, first dimensional separation was performed; the IPG-strips from previous day were installed into the focusing machine and a current was applied to the IPG-strip, with a prefabricated solid phase pH-gradient. The current forced the proteins to migrate in the immobilized pH-gradient towards the electrode with charge opposite to their own net charge. The migration, in the IPG strip continued until

7 the net charge of the protein equalled zero (iso-electric point). Isoelectric focused IPGstrips (Fig 2) were stored at -70°C until further analysis.

Fig 2. Purified prostasomal proteins focused at their respective iso-electric points on an IPG-strip

First dimensional separation with IPG-strips was performed on small (11cm) strips (200 µL protein/buffer solution (1:10)) and on large (17cm) strips (300 µL protein/buffer solution (1:10)). Second dimension separation was common SDS-PAGE separation by molecular weight (kDa). Prostasome proteins were visualized on small and large gels by colloidal blue and silver staining. The silver-stained large gel was used to detect the exact coordinate position of the correlating immunogenic proteins from the Western blot. 3.7 2D-Western blot SDS-PAGE gels (11cm, 4-12% gradient) with separated purified prostasome proteins were blotted to a nitrocellulose membrane as previously described. Seven sera with strong and scattered immunospots were also blotted from large gels 17cm, 8-16% gradient. The Western blot was performed as before.

8 3.8 MALDI-TOF Proteins recognized by Western blotting were selected for identification via mass spectrometry. Preparative gels loaded with 200 µg protein from extracted purified prostasomes were stained with Coomassie-staining. Immunogenic protein spots were determined by the MALDI-TOF (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight) method. This method uses the mass to charge (MALDI is a soft ionization method and will result in predominantly single charged peptide fragments) ratio of laser fragmented ionized peptides accelerated in an electric field. The time of flight through an electric field free region was recorded by an analyzer at the end of the tube. Lighter ions gain more velocity from the electric field acceleration than the heavier ones. All ions entering the TOF tube have a fixed kinetic energy. The accuracy of mass determination for biomolecules can be measured within an accuracy of 0.01% of the molecular weight of the sample, if the sample has a molecular weight less than 40 kDa [23]. Trypsin fragments of masses 842.50 Da and 2211.10 Da were used as internal standards for spectra calibration. Data generated are going to be screened in databases.

4. RESULTS 4.1 Purification of prostasomes Sephadex eluate of the solubilized prostasome pellet had 2 separated absorbance peaks at wave lengths 260 nm (nucleic acid) and 280 nm (protein). All fractions were tested for amino peptidase N-activity at 410 nm. The highest UV-peak had activity for amino peptidase N, strongly indicating presence of prostasomes (Fig 3). Eluted fractions from the highest UV- peak (6-11) were pooled together. The second peak (fractions 19-27) did not contain any aminopeptidase N activity and thereby no prostasomes.

9

ABSORBANCE (A) VALUE

2,5

A 280 nm A 260 nm ∆ 410 nm

2,0

1,5

1,0

0,5

0,0 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

FRACTION NUMBER

Fig 3. Elution pattern from Sephadex G200 column chromatography of pelleted material obtained after ultracentrifugation at two different velocities of seminal plasma. Five different suspensions were pooled and eluted by 30 mM Tris-HCl buffer containing 130 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.6 at a flow rate of 6 mL/h.

4.2 ELISA Fortyfour sera with high factor number in the ELISA assay (in accordance with the inclusion criteria, range 1.141-4.047) were further investigated by 1D-Western blotting. 4.3 1D-electrophoresis SDS-PAGE separated colloidal-stained, purified prostasome proteins revealed several bands in the molecular weight range of 10-200 kDa. There was also a distinct band with higher molecular weight. Bands corresponding to proteins of the approximate weights 150, 120 and 100 kDa have already been identified from 1D-PAGE and mass spectrometry as aminopeptidase N (CD 13), dipeptidylpeptidase IV (CD 26) and enkephalinase (CD 10) (Fig 4).

10

MW (kDa)

P Aminopeptidase N (CD 13)

188Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (CD 26)

62-

Enkephalinase (CD 10)

49382818146Fig 4. Colloidal stained 1D-SDS-PAGE separation of prostasomes. Molecular weight (MW) marker in first lane. Separated prostasome proteins (P) in second lane. Bands at molecular weight 150, 120 and 100 kDa was previously determined by 1D mass spectrometry as aminopeptidase N, dipeptidylpeptidase IV and enkephalinase.

4.4 1D-Western blot Immunoblotting with 44 patients´ sera generally revealed several immunogenic bands (range 10-170 kDa) for a majority of the sera (Fig 5a-c). Some of the bands were more frequently represented than others, bands at molecular weight 170 kDa occurred in 41% (18/44) of the blots, bands at molecular weight 55 kDa occurred in 32% (14/44) of the blots, and bands at molecular weight 70 kDa occurred in 32% (14/44) of the blots. Some of the controls generated weak bands while others gave rise to no bands at all (Fig 5d).

11

kDa MW

a

b

c

1

9

19

d

188 97 62 49 38 28 17 14 -

6contr

Fig 5. Western blot of patients´ sera (a-c) as well as of a control (d). Molecular weight (MW) markers in first lane.

Thirty one of the 44 (31/44) patients´ sera (70%) produced either distinct or very distinct bands (Table 1). The total amount of bands was 80 and the distribution of weak and strong bands and their respective sizes is shown in figure 6.

12

Band visibility Serum 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Distinct 10 , 55 , 70 , 170 , 200 15 , 25 70 , 90 , 96 50 55 , 170 25 , 55 , 70 15 100 55 , 170 25 , 30 25 , 42 , 170 25 25 , 170 50 , 55 90 55 13 , 55 , 100 100 , 170 50 , 55 , 100 25 , 50 , 170 170 70 , 170 100 70 100 70

Very distinct 170 55 , 170 50 , 170 15 , 70 , 170 55 55 55 70 10 70 , 170 55 15 , 55 , 170 35 , 70 70 , 170 96 96 , 170 70 70 70 , 170 -

TABLE I. Visible bands corresponding to proteins in patient´s sera revealed by immunoblotting on seminal prostasomes. The bands are labeled with the corresponding approximate size (kDa) of the proteins revealed. Thirteen of the 31 tested sera did not show any distinct bands in immunoblotting. Sera 1, 9 and 19 are visualized in figure 5.

13

18 very distinct

16

distinct

Positive patients´ sera (n)

14 12 10 8 6 4 2

200

170

100

96

90

70

60

55

50

42

35

30

25

15

13

10

0 Molecular w eight (kDa)

Fig 6. Size distribution (kDa) of purified prostasomal proteins recognized by prostate cancer patients´sera (n=31) in Western blot.The bands are seperated into two groups depending on the distinctness (distinct and very distinct) of the band (amount) on the immunoblot.

4.5 2D-electrophoresis 2D-Separation and silver staining of purified prostasome proteins resulted in more than 300 visible protein spots in the IP-range 3-10. IPG-strips (11cm) with pH-range 3-10 and 5-8 were stained, and most of the proteins were inside the 5-8 range; the 5-8 range was used in following experiments. Separation on large gel (17cm) was made for comparison of coordinates for immunogenic protein spots on Western blots (Fig 7).

14

pI 5.0 90

SDS-PAGE

MW

IEF 8.0

30

20

15

Fig 7. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis map (immobilized pH gradient 5-8, large gel (17 cm), silver stained). The arrow points out the Clusterin protein.Clusterin is a protein working as an apoptotic switch and was visible on most of the Western blots over prostasome proteins.

15

4.6 2D-Western blot Out of 14 small-gel Western blotted sera (Fig 8 displays one of them), 9 sera with clear, distinct spots were selected for blotting on large gels (Fig 9 shows one out of totally 9 gels).

MW (kDa) 5 90

Ip-range 8

10

Fig 8. Western blot (small gel, 11cm) of antigens in purified prostasome proteins. The arrow points out the Clusterin protein.

Western blot in large gels displayed a recurrent appearance of an immunogenic spot at molecular weight 37kDa, previously determined as the protein Clusterin (Fig 7, 8, 9). Commonly seen was a band of droplet-shaped immunogenic protein spots at higher molecular weight (Fig 9). These and scattered immunogenic spots (in total 25 spots) were punched and forwarded for MALDI-TOF determination (Fig10).

16

pH

5

8

Mw (kDa) 2

70

1

40

10

Fig 9. Western blot (large gel 17 cm) of prostasome proteins incubated with serum from a prostate cancer patient. Clusterin (1) and its iso-forms. Droplet-shaped formation of immunogenic proteins (2) characteristically found in serum of prostate cancer patients.

17

MW

Ip 8

Ip 5

90 1

2 345 6

11

7

40

10

9 8

21 24

13 14 15 16 1718

19

20

12

22

20

25

23

10

Fig 10. Silver-stained 2D gel of prostasome proteins. Numbered spots have been punched and sent for identification by mass spectrometry and database search.

18

5. DISCUSSION This work was undertaken as a first step to characterize the molecular targets of autoantibodies directed against prostasomes as a consequence of the development of prostate cancer in man. Normally, prostasomes have a role in protecting and promoting motility of sperms in the fertilization process. Also, prostasomes have antibacterial and antioxidant abilities which favour the normal reproductive process. It is demonstrated that not only one but a limited number of prostasome proteins is a target for antibody responses in patients with prostate cancer and elevated ELISA-titres of antiprostasome autoantibodies. Thirteen of the tested sera gave bands that were too weak to be included into the test material. This is probably due to the fact that the ELISA selection is much more sensitive, and positive levels of serum antibodies in ELISA may be too weak to appear in the Western blots employed in the present study. Blood sera from a large selection of patients with prostate cancer diagnosis were used for the Western blots. Since all case-books were available, comparisons between antibody response (for each antigen protein) and the severeness of the tumour will be done. Prostasomes normally appear in a secluded area, which means that they do not evoke an immune response behind this barrier. On the other hand, once outside the barrier as in pathological conditions, like prostate cancer, they are able to be immunogenic. This makes surface antigens on prostasomes interesting as a diagnostic tool whereas the blood serum antibody level could be a measure with possible information regarding aggressiveness of the tumour. Today prostate specific antigen (PSA) is the most common biochemical marker for prostate cancer. Prostate specific antigen is a prostate specific protein that evokes an immune response outside the prostate. It has the disadvantage of being rather organ-specific but not cancer-specific therefore other diseases like prostatitis and benign tumours elevate the PSA concentration in serum and some few patients do not show elevated PSA values even after the cancer has become aggressive [25]. It could be mentioned in this context that great demands are made upon the concept of a cancerspecific serum marker, and as a matter of fact, there is no such serum marker available in clinical praxis at present. Therefore PSA with its shortcomings has to be supplemented. The present study on autoantibodies in serum against prostasomes should be understood as complementary to the already existing PSA test in prostate cancer. A new or complementary biochemical marker (as one or more prostasomal antigen(s)) is urgently needed for correct prognostic evaluation of prostate cancer. Permanent treatment in many cases is available for patients with an early discovered tumour.

6. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES The biochemical data of the present study with a possible disclosing of new prostasomal antigens recognized by prostate cancer patients´sera should be compared with patient data. By such a comparison it would be possible to identify and link some of the prostasomal antigens to certain patient characteristics as aggressiveness and liability of the prostate cancer to metastasize.

19

7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my supervisor Dr Lena Carlsson for excellent planning and guidance throughout the project. I also thank my scientific reviewer Professor Anders Larsson for encouragement and stimulating discussions.

20

8. REFERENCES

1. Ronquist G, Brody I, Gottfries A, Stegmayr B: An Mg2+ and Ca2+-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase in human prostatic fluid. Andrologia 10:261-272, part I and 427-433, part II, 1978. 2. Brody I, Ronquist G, Gottfries A: Ultrastructureal localization of the prostasome- An organelle in human seminal plasma. Upsala J Med Sci 88:63-80, 1983. 3. Ronquist G, Brody I: The prostasome; Its secretion and function in man. Biochim Biophys Acta 822:203-218, 1985 4. Ronquist G, Stegmayr B: Prostatic origin of fucosyl transferase in human seminal plasma-A study on healthy controls and on men with infertility or with prostatic cancer. Urol Res 12:243-247, 1984. 5. Arvidson G, Ronquist G, Wikander G, Öjteg AC: Human prostasome membranes exhibit very high cholesterol/phospholipid ratios yielding high molecular ordering. Biochim Biophys Acta 984:167-173, 1989. 6. Wang J, Lundqvist M, Carlsson L, Nilsson O, Lundkvist Ö, Ronquist G: Prostasomelike granules from the PC-3 prostate cancer cell line increase the motility of washed human spermatozoa and adhere to the sperm. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 96:88-97, 2001. 7. Stegmayr B, Ronquist G: Promotive effect on human sperm progressive motility by prostasomes. Urol Res 10:253-257, 1982. 8. Fabiani R, Johansson L, Lundkvist Ö, Ronquist G: Enhanced recruitment of motile spermatozoa by prostasome inclusion in swim-up medium. Hum Reprod 9:1485-1489, 1994. 9. Carlsson L, Påhlson C, Bergquist M, Ronquist G, Stridsberg M: Antibacterial activity of human prostasomes. Prostate 44:279-286, 2000. 10. Skibinski G, Kelly RW, Harkiss D, James K: Immunosuppression by human seminal plasma-Extracellular organelles (prostasomes) modulate activity of phagocytic cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 28:97-103, 1992. 11. Läkemedelsverket. Behandling av prostatacancer, http://www.mpa.se/workshops/reko/031127_prostata.shtml (27 nov 2004). 12. Socialstyrelsen. Cancer incidence in Sweden 1997. Stockholm 1999 13. Bunting PS. A guide to the interpretation of serum prostate specific antigen levels. Clin Biochem 28:221-241, 1995. 14. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 281:1642-1645, 1999. 15. Correale P, Walmsley K, Nieroda C, Zaremba S, Zhu M, Schlom J, Tsang KY. In vitro generation of human cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for peptides derived from prostate-specific antigen. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:272-275, 1997. 16. Sahlén GE, Egevad L, Ahlander A, Norlén BJ, Ronquist G, Nilsson BO. Ultrastructure of the secretion of prostasomes from benign and malignant epithelial cells in the prostate. Prostate 53:192-199, 2002. 17. Nilsson BO, Carlsson L, Larsson A, Ronquist G. Autoantibodies to prostasomes as new markers for prostate cancer. Upsala J Med Sci 106:43-50, 2001. 18. Larsson A, Ronquist G, Wulfing C, Eltze E, Bettendorf O, Carlsson L, Nilsson BO, Semjonow A. Prostasome autoantibodies: Possible serum markers for prostate cancer metastasizing liability. Submitted, 2004. 19. Utleg AG, Yi EC, Xie T, Shannon P, White JT, Goodlett DR, Hood L, Lin B. Proteomic analysis of human prostasomes. Prostate 56:151-161, 2003.

21 20. Carlsson L, Nilsson BO, Larsson A, Stridsberg M, Sahlén G, Ronquist G. Characteristics of human prostasomes isolated from three different sources. Prostate 54:322-330, 2003. 21. Ronquist G, Frithz G, Jansson Å. Prostasome membrane associated enzyme activities and semen parameters in men attending an infertility clinic. Urol Int 43:133-138, 1988. 22. Carlsson L, Nilsson O, Ronquist G, Lundquist M, Larsson A: A new test for immunological infertility: an ELISA based on prostasomes. Int J of Andr 27:130-133, 2004. 23. Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, http:www.astbury.leeds.ac.uk (17 nov 2004) 24. National Cancer Institute. The Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test: Questions and Answers.http://cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/5_29.htm (17 nov 2004).