Hybrid Procedures in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Hybrid Procedures in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Emile A.M. Bacha and Ziyad M. Hijazi Hybrid pediatric cardiac surgery is an emerging field that combine...
Author: Jonah Sharp
0 downloads 2 Views 272KB Size
Hybrid Procedures in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Emile A.M. Bacha and Ziyad M. Hijazi Hybrid pediatric cardiac surgery is an emerging field that combines skills and techniques used by pediatric cardiac surgeons and interventional pediatric cardiologists. This article describes the emerging indications and techniques in hybrid pediatric cardiac surgery and discusses potential future applications. It focuses on peratrial and perventricular septal defect closure, intraoperative stenting, hybrid stage I palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and percutaneous valve implantation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Ann 8:78-85 © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. KEYWORDS: Hybrid pediatric cardiac surgery

The best way to predict the future is to create it. Peter F. Drucker 1909 –, Author and Business Philosopher A close collaboration between congenital heart surgeons and interventional cardiologists has traditionally been a hallmark of the management of difficult lesions, such as tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia. However, work was mostly done in sequence. Hybrid pediatric cardiac surgery is an emerging field that reaches across interdisciplinary lines and combines skills and techniques traditionally used by pediatric cardiac surgeons and interventional pediatric cardiologists into, ideally, a single procedure. The goal of hybrid pediatric cardiac surgery is to reduce the magnitude of therapeutic interventions on children by decreasing their numbers or their invasiveness or by increasing their effectiveness by opening new therapeutic possibilities. A key difference with conventional minimally invasive surgery is the extensive use of intraoperative imaging techniques, such as fluoroscopy or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) used on the beating heart while performing a given task, as opposed to working on an arrested flaccid heart and “checking the result” afterward. Thus, hybrid techniques are especially useful in the following two scenarios: (1) when surgery or catheter-based interventions alone are not achieving a satisfactory result for a given problem and (2) when the combination of the two fields results in less invasiveness and less trauma to the patient.

Sections of Cardiothoracic Surgery (Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery) and Pediatric Cardiology, The University of Chicago Children’s Hospital, Chicago, IL. Address reprint requests to Emile A. Bacha, MD, Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, The University of Chicago Children’s Hospital, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 5040, Chicago, IL 60637.


1092-9126/05/$-see front matter © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1053/j.pcsu.2005.01.001

This article focuses on recent and future developments in hybrid procedures for the management of certain congenital cardiac defects.

Perventricular Ventricular Septal Defect Closure Although surgical results for multiple muscular ventricular septal defects (muscVSDs) have improved recently in terms of hospital survival1,2, the need for ventriculotomies2-4, palliative procedures such as pulmonary artery (PA) banding, and a persistent rate of residual VSDs remains significant. In addition, the presence of associated muscVSDs with complex lesions such as transposition of the great arteries or doubleoutlet right ventricle has long been recognized to be an independent risk factor of early mortality.5,6 During surgery, some muscVSDs may never be found despite searching by extensive resection of muscular trabeculations. This emphasizes the need for an approach that allows for VSD closure with real-time visualization on a beating euvolemic heart. Isolated muscVSDs can be surgically closed with excellent overall success, but the majority of these patients are being managed by the percutaneous approach, which, over the last few years, has become increasingly popular.7 A recent report on mid-term results of a United States registry of 69 patients revealed a hospital mortality of 2.9% and a major complication rate of 11%.8 Complete closure was achieved in about half the patients at 24 hours and in ⬎90% of patients at 12 months follow-up. That report and others9 showed that the chances of procedural success are limited by patient weight or by VSD size. The interventional approach is further limited by vascular access problems in patients who have often had many interventional procedures. Finally, many patients with

Hybrid procedures in pediatric cardiac surgery


Figure 1 A 3-month-old patient with supposedly one anterior mid-muscular VSD. (A) Two separate VSDs can be demonstrated. (B) The needle puncture the right ventricular free wall. (C) The wire is inserted into the LV cavity. (D) The sheath is positioned into the LV cavity. (E) Because of restricted space in the right ventricular apex, an Amplatzer ductal occluder device is used. (F) Residual shunting through the other VSD. (G) An Amplatzer congenital MVSD device is used to close the other VSD. (H) No residual shunting.

muscVSDs have been banded or have concomitant lesions that require surgical repair. The safety of perventricular puncture and device delivery has been validated in animal experiments.10 Current indications for the perventricular closure of muscVSDs include any infant weighing ⬍5 kg or any child with associated muscVSDs and other cardiac defects requiring simultaneous repair, such as PA debanding, double outlet right ventricle, coarctation, or transposition of the great vessels. There are no absolute contraindications to this technique.

Technique The technique has been described elsewhere.11 Briefly, under continuous TEE guidance and via a median sternotomy, or a subxiphoid minimally invasive incision (if there are no other lesions), the best location for right ventricular (RV) puncture is chosen. A purse-string suture is placed, the RV is punctured using an 18G needle (Cook Inc., Bloomington, IN), and an 0.035-inch short guide wire is passed through the VSD. Once the wire tip is positioned in the left ventricular (LV) cavity, the needle is removed, and a short, proper size, introducer sheath with a dilator is fed over the wire and advanced into the LV cavity. Extreme care is exercised not to advance the sheath with the dilator too far into the LV cavity because of the risk of perforation. The dilator is removed, and the sheath is de-aired. The proper size device (usually 1-2 mm larger than the size of VSD at end diastole) is chosen. The device used is the Amplatzer MVSD device (AGA Medical Corporation, Golden Valley, MN). The device is pre-soaked

in nonheparinized blood, screwed to the cable, and pulled inside a loader. It is then advanced inside the short delivery sheath until the LV disk opens up in the LV cavity by retraction of the sheath over the cable. The entire assembly is withdrawn until the LV disk abuts the septum. Further retraction of the sheath over the cable deploys the waist and then the RV disk (Fig 1). At that stage, the device can still be re-captured into the delivery sheath if the device position is unsatisfactory. If the position is satisfactory, the device is released by counterclockwise rotation of the cable using a pin vise. A complete TEE study in multiple planes is done to confirm proper device position and to assess for residual shunting and any obstruction or regurgitation induced by the device.

Advantages, Disadvantages, and Pitfalls The advantages of this technique over standard surgical techniques include the real-time feedback obtained by continuous TEE monitoring during perventricular device closure. Precise identification of VSD rims, residual shunts, device malposition, or atrioventricular (AV) valve problems secondary to chordal impingement by the device can be diagnosed in real-time and corrected. Further advantages include avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with isolated muscVSDs or, if associated cardiac lesions are present, marked reduction in CPB and myocardial ischemia time. Other advantages include avoidance of any ventricular incisions or muscle transections.

80 Compared with percutaneous approaches, it has no weight and no vascular access limitations. Crossing muscVSDs percutaneously in patients with unusual septal planes, such as double outlet right ventricle or transposition of the great arteries, can be challenging. By using the direct access perventricular technique, the septum is approached from a perpendicular angle, allowing for a “straight shot” at the VSD and less need, if any, for torque. However, even with a perventricular approach, some VSDs may not be easy to cross. In this situation, we have used percutaneous femoral arterial access to cross the VSD with a wire from the left side under fluoroscopic guidance. Using a gooseneck snare (ev3 Inc., Plymouth, MN) introduced into the PA via a perventricular RV puncture, the wire is snared under fluoroscopy and exteriorized out the right ventricle free wall creating an arterioright ventricular loop. Over this wire, the short delivery sheath is guided to cross the VSD into the LV cavity, enabling device placement as described previously. Finally, percutaneous closure of muscVSDs in a banded child often results in residual shunting after the PA band is removed in the OR.12 The present technique offers the possibility to de-band and reconstruct the PA and then close all VSDs in one operative setting on the beating heart. Pitfalls include difficulties with the RV disk expansion in patients with RV hypertrophy. The RV disk may not expand completely, and the screw sometimes protrudes through the puncture site. We have dealt with this problem by suturing the tip (microscrew) of the device to the epicardium with a simple pledgetted stitch placed on the beating heart. This was performed in two patients with a follow-up of 3 and 22 months, respectively. No complications have been observed. Another alternative is to use an Amplatzer duct occluder device, which looks like a mushroom with a large “left-sided” disk and a stalk (no disk) for the right side. Finally, during the LV disk deployment, the mitral subvalvar apparatus may get entangled in the device. This should be recognized immediately on the TEE and dealt with by recapturing the disk and re-deploying it away from the mitral valve apparatus. Our current patient experience (n ⫽ 10) is detailed in Table 1.

Peratrial Atrial Septal Defect Closure We have performed peratrial atrial septal defect closure in four patients. Indications for this simple procedure are usually patients with hemodynamically significant ASDs who are not candidates for percutaneous ASD device closure or cardiopulmonary bypass. Examples would be low-weight premature newborns with large ASDs and severe broncho-pulmonary dysplasia or intraventricular hemorrhage. Other potential candidates are those in whom percutaneous device closure has failed due to large atrial septal aneurysms or due to failed attempts to align the left atrial disk parallel to the septum because of the angle of approach. The technique is similar to the perventricular technique.

E.A. Bacha and Z.M. Hijazi

Intraoperative Stenting Patch enlargement of branch PA stenosis or pulmonary vein ostial stenosis can be time consuming and technically challenging.13 Along with intraoperative balloon dilation of recurrent coarctation,14 intraoperative stent implantation into branch PAs or pulmonary veins can be viewed as one of the earliest attempts at hybrid surgery.15 Experience with intraoperative stenting of pulmonary veins is mixed at best and cannot be recommended.13,15,16 The indications for intraoperative PA stenting are patients with limited vascular access and patients who need concomitant surgical procedures. Dissection around the segment to be stented should be avoided in case transmural tears occur. The stents can be placed on the arrested heart with the main PA opened. This allows for cardioscopic endoluminal visualization of the stent position, including the lobar branch ostia.17 They can also be placed on the beating heart via a puncture of the RV outflow or the main PA, using fluoroscopy to determine placement. An initial angiogram is performed, followed by passage of a wire into the desired branch and stent deployment using standard catheter techniques. This allows for precise positioning in relation to the hilar branches and solves one of the major problems associated with intraoperative stenting on the arrested heart; namely, during insertion, the distal portion of the balloon and stent cannot be seen directly and thus could tear the vessel if expanded in a lobar branch orifice. From the available literature and our own experience with nine patients, ideal candidates are older children with diffusely small branch PAs that have failed surgical patch angioplasty or children in whom the retroaortic PA is compressed by a large neo-aorta. We have found that direct cardiac access stent implantation on the beating heart under fluoroscopic control provides the most control. Small stents (10 mm or smaller) should be avoided because they lead to in-stent stenosis;16 thus, this procedure should be avoided in small children. Another potential pitfall is that stenting of the retroaortic PA may result in left coronary artery compression.

Hybrid Palliation for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome and Other Single-Ventricle Anomalies Despite recent improvements in survival rates, the Norwood Stage I operation remains a high-risk endeavor characterized by invasive neonatal procedure that requires prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass with occasional deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, multiple blood transfusions, prolonged intensive care recovery, and delayed sternal closure. When compared with infants, neonates have been shown to have reduced immune defenses ans diastolic function and greater propensity to capillary-leak syndrome. Risk factors for dying or serious morbidity include presentation with shock, birth weight ⬍2.5 kg, prematurity ⬍34 weeks gestational age, age ⬎30 days, aortic atresia, poor ventricular function, tricuspid regurgitation, or serious noncardiac malformations.18 Although the significance of some of these risk factors, espe-

Age Weight


Isolated muscular VSD in infants† 17 d Large anterior muscle VSD 3 kg 4 mo Anterior muscle VSD, ASD 4 kg 4 mo Two large anterior VSDs, 5.5 kg multiple apical VSDs

Device Size

Additional Procedures



Intraoperative Complications

Postoperative Complications

Echo and Status at F/U (mos)

12 mm






No shunt asympt.20

10 mm (VSD) 11 mm (ASD) 10 mm (PDA device) 8 mm






No shunt asympt.22

Perventricular arteriovenous loop (see text)



1st device recaptured and exchanged for PDA device


Small shunt via tiny apical VSDs, asympt.3



No shunt, asympt.17



No shunt, asympt.23



No shunt, restrictive lung disease5



Difficult deployment of RV disk


No resid. VSD asympt.14 No residual VSD, asympt.22

LV failure, ECMO; t/d of repair, device removal, Fontan No

Pleural effusions

Widely patent ASD and VSD asympt.19


No shunt, asympt.25

Muscular VSD with other surgical lesions: Coarctation of the aorta/muscular VSD in neonates 14 d Hypoplastic aortic arch ⴙ 8 mm Coarctation Yes No 3.2 kg coarctation, mid-muscle repair and VSD arch augment 20 d Aortic CoAⴙarch hypopl., 6 mm Coarctation Yes No 3 kg large anterior muscle repair and VSD, LV hypoplasia arch augment 16 d Hypoplastic aortic arch ⴙ 8 mm Coarctation Yes No 3.1 kg coarctation, mid-muscle repair and VSD arch augment Muscular VSDs s/p PA band 3 yr S/p PA band for posterior 14 mm Band removal Yes No 15 kg muscle VSD and PA plasty 2.5 yr S/p PA band for multiple 18 mm Band removal Yes No 12 kg apical VSDs and PA plasty Other infants and children Yes Yes 3 yr DORV, TGA, inlet VSD, 14 mm VSD extension 20 kg apical muscle VSD, LV-aortic hypopl. LV, s/p BDG baffle, t/d BDG Yes Yes 5 mo DORV, subaortic VSD, 8 mm Subao. VSD 7 kg subPS/PS, multiple patch, pulm. apical VSDs valvot., RV outflow patch

Hybrid procedures in pediatric cardiac surgery

Table 1 The University of Chicago Experience With Perventricular VSD Closure (09/02–10/04) (10 Patients)

Abbreviations: ASD, atrial septal defect; BDG, bidirectional Glenn shunt; BTS, Blalock-Taussig shunt; CHF, congestive heart failure; coarct., coarctation; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; augment., augmentation; D/C, discharge; FTT, failure to thrive; hypopl., hypoplasia; LV, left ventricle; valvot., valvotomy; PA, pulmonary artery; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; PS, pulmonary stenosis; POD, post-operative day; reperf., reperfusion; RV, right ventricle; s/p, status post; t/d, take-down; VSD, ventricular septal defect; asympt., asymptomatic. Certain data from Bacha EA, Cao QL, Starr JP, et al: Perventricular device closure of muscular ventricular septal defects on the beating heart: Technique and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:1718 –1723, 2003. *Cardiopulmonary bypass was needed only for additional procedures, not for placement of the device. †All three via minimally-invasive xiphoid incision.


E.A. Bacha and Z.M. Hijazi

82 cially aortic atresia, has be argued, given the available survival rates for these high-risk patients, a less invasive method of stage I palliation should be beneficial. Furthermore, neurologic development of the survivors in relation to prolonged neonatal CPB or hospitalization in the setting of cyanosis and low cardiac output remains an issue.19-21 Branch PA banding is one of the earliest methods of stabilization and remains popular today in specific situations.22,23 Encouraged by initial success of ductal stenting, some groups in Europe began using the strategy of percutaneous ductal stenting followed by surgical band placement for initial palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome.24,25 This strategy could lead to a percutaneous Fontan completion,26,27 with one major on-pump reconstruction sandwiched between two interventional procedures.

If the stent is not covering the entire ductus, another stent is deployed to overlap the first stent (one case in our experience). If the pulmonary artery bands are deemed to be too tight or loose, they can be adjusted accordingly. We prefer the diameter of the banded portion of the PA to be approximately 30% to 40% of the diameter of the proximal PA (Fig 2). If the atrial septum is restrictive, the atrial communication can be enlarged using a self-expandable stent, or a balloon atrial septostomy is performed from the umbilical vein under fluoroscopic guidance. We have deployed atrial septal stent via a peratrial puncture similar to the technique described for closure of an ASD in two patients. Most patients were receiving low FiO2 (mean 23%, range 21-30) at the beginning of the procedure and left the catheter laboratory at slightly higher FiO2 (mean 30%, range 21-50, P ⫽ NS) with oxygen saturations in the mid-eighties.

Technique The procedure is performed in the catheterization laboratory, which is prepared by having the surgical nursing team set up instruments as if in the operating room. The ECMO team remains on stand-by. A TEE probe is placed unless the atrial septum is judged to be nonrestrictive on surface echo. Under usual monitoring, chest, abdomen (incorporate umbilical lines in the field), and groins are prepped and draped. A median sternotomy is performed, and the thymus is subtotally resected. The chest retractor is placed in such a way as to be able to remove it when fluoroscopy is performed. The pericardium is opened excentrically and not resected. Stay sutures are placed. A 1.5-mm wide ring is cut off a standard 3.5-mm Gore-Tex tube graft (W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ) and cut open. A 5-0 polypropylene mattress suture is placed through one end of the cut ring. The right PA is encircled to the right of the ascending aorta, and the GoreTex band is pulled through using the arms of the 5-0 suture. The suture is passed through the other end of the band and tied. Small size clips are placed over the sutured portion, and more clips can be used to tighten further, if necessary. The left PA is similarly banded at its origin. It is important to not dissect the branch PAs more than necessary to use the surrounding tissues as buttress against band migration. Next a 5-0 polypropylene purse-string is placed at the sino-tubular junction of the main PA. The main pulmonary artery is punctured using a 21G needle (Cook Inc., Bloomington, IN), and a 0.018-inch short guide wire is passed into the descending aorta via the ductus. A short 6Fr sheath is advanced over the guide wire and positioned just above the pulmonic valve. An angiogram is performed using the sheath in the main PA in a 45° LAO angulation to measure the ductal diameter and to assess the position and appropriateness of the bands. The proper size self-expandable stent (usually an 8 ⫻ 20 mm) is advanced over the guide wire. The stent is placed so that the distal end of it is just protruding into the descending aorta and the proximal part is just above the branch PA openings. We have been using the Precise (Cordis; Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ) or Protégé (ev3 Inc, Plymouth, MN) stents. Once the stent is deployed, repeat angiogram is performed to assess the position of the stent, the bands, and the aortic arch.

Results Between November 2003 and November 2004, we performed 11 hybrid stage I procedures consisting of singlestage ductal stenting and bilateral branch PA banding. The mean weight was 2.8 kg (range 2.2-3.3 kg), and the mean age was 5.7 days (range 1-17 days). Pre-operative risk factors were present in all patients and included aortic atresia in seven, weight ⬍2.5 kg in three; severe noncardiac genetic anomaly in two; and prematurity (⬍34 weeks gestational age), intact atrial septum, intracerebral bleed, presentation in shock, LV-coronary fistulae, partial left diaphragmatic hernia, intestinal pneumatosis, and poor ventricular function in one each, respectively. Intraoperative complications occurred in one patient who suffered cardiac arrest; the patient required ECMO and subsequently required a heart transplant. This patient died of sepsis at 8 weeks of age. All the other patients had their chests closed primarily, and none required an increase in or initiation of inotropic support. Hospital survival after hybrid stage I was 9/11 patients (81%). There were two ductal stents migrations: One was fatal, and the other required repeat percutaneous stenting. Bands had to be revised (typically tightened) in the first four patients. Since adopting the method of completion angiogram to check the bands (see above), we have not had to revise bands in the last six patients. There was one interstage fatality from atrial stent migration. Six patients underwent a stage II reconstruction consisting of stent removal, aortic arch reconstruction, and cavopulmonary shunt. Five survived, and one died from superior vena cava thrombosis related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. One later died at home at age 8 months from an infection likely related to severe immunodeficiency from DiGeorge-related T-cell malfunction. Two patients are currently awaiting stage II.

Advantages, Disadvantages, and Pitfalls Our results reflect a steep learning curve. Nevertheless, despite this being a pilot series of consecutive patients, out-

Hybrid procedures in pediatric cardiac surgery


Figure 2 Neonate with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum. The left panel shows the atrial stent, the ductal stent, two clips marking the bands, two tourniquet snares (one on the MPA purse string, one on the right atrial appendage), and the sheath still in position in the main pulmonary artery with a wire into the descending aorta. The right panel is a completion angiogram demonstrating the tightness of the bands.

comes have been in the range of those seen by the majority of programs who perform a stage I Norwood procedure for high-risk patients. Problems that have emerged from this series have been: 1. Ductal stent migration (two cases, including one death). We now routinely measure the ductal width by angiogram and oversize by 1-2 mm. Because of the large ductuses associated with interrupted aortic arch, we view this entity as a contraindication to ductal stenting. 2. Atrial stents performed well in the short term but poorly in the long term (⬎8-12 weeks). Two patients had stent migration; one died at home, and the other required open surgical septostomy. We do not rely on atrial stents for more than 3 months. Elective stage II is scheduled for 3 months of age, and we keep a close eye on these patients by weekly echocardiograms. As part of an interstage monitoring protocol, an angiogram is performed at 6 weeks of age in preparation for stage II. Patients who had no interventions initially on their atrial septum can be balloon dilated or stented at that time. 3. Difficulties in left PA reconstruction (two patients required left PA stenting shortly after stage II). We now routinely patch the left PA at the time of stage II. 4. Potential problems of retrograde flow into the arch in aortic atresia. We have not seen this problem, but one of the patients had a 3-mm opening into his arch at the time of stage II. 5. Postoperative care: Overall, the procedure was not difficult to learn, and the postoperative care is benign.

Most patients were extubated shortly after the procedure. 6. The stage II reconstruction is a challenging operation. However, the physiologic reserve of a 3-6 month-old is greater than that of a neonate. Furthermore, assuming the technical aspects (mainly aortic arch reconstruction) are mastered, the patient is left postoperatively with a circulation in series and not in parallel as after the Norwood stage I and is thus easier to manage.

Percutaneous Valve Implantation Percutaneous valve implantation has been successfully performed in the aortic28 and pulmonary29 position. Surgeons need to be acutely aware of ongoing efforts and become pioneers in this field because they have invaluable decades-old expertise, they will have to manage the complications that will undoubtedly occur, they may have to modify right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction into a specific set-up that allows for future percutaneous implants in the case of growing children, and they may be called upon for direct access transcatheter valve placement.30-32 In pediatrics, peripheral vascular access is a major issue for insertion of the larger introducer systems that percutaneous valves require. Valved stents inserted through the groin have to travel over a long path to reach the target zone, which is usually the level of the annulus of the native or prosthetic valve. Long delivery systems must be flexible enough for steerability but rigid enough to have good torque and resistance to kinking. Having to negotiate these systems safely through AV valves can be

E.A. Bacha and Z.M. Hijazi

84 challenging. Until new technologic advances solve these problems, direct access to the heart may be a better approach. This can be accomplished via full sternotomy, thoracic miniincisions (such as a subxiphoid incision for access to the right ventricle), or a trans-apical approach. The latter can potentially be performed with robotic or thoracoscopic assistance. Direct implantation without sutures via aortotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass has also been reported.33 Direct access to the heart has a number of advantages over remote access, including shorter delivery systems and no size limitations. This translates into higher-quality devices (less need to miniaturize), better delivery systems, overall ease of implantation, and reduced complications. Recently, device closure of the perventricular puncture site was introduced. This may allow for easier control of cardiac puncture sites via minimally invasive techniques.34

Research and Development To progress further, hybrid techniques will rely heavily on new development of technologies in multiple areas that may not be directly related to cardiac surgery, such as devices (absorbable stents for temporary ductal stenting, lower profile septal closure devices), intraoperative imaging, or new energy sources (ultrasound tissue erosion35 for percutaneous creation of an unrestrictive ASD in stage I palliation). Electrophysiologists have been able to map and instrument the surface of the heart via a percutaneous approach working in the pericardial space.36 Better techniques allowing for safe peratrial or perventricular delivery of devices through the unopened pericardial space via robotic technology or thoracoscopy should be developed.37,38 Extensive use, development, and understanding by surgeons of real-time intraoperative imaging technology by fluoroscopy, 3D echocardiography,39 intracardiac echocardiography,40 or MRI41 is essential. Finally, specially outfitted hybrid suites need to be developed that allow for maximally invasive open-heart surgery and diagnostic imaging on the same table. Such a hybrid OR would potentially allow for a “one-stop shopping” type of management, whereby two traditionally separate interventions (catheterization followed by surgery) would be melded into a single therapeutic session during a single period of anesthesia.42 The emergence of an interventional/surgical superspecialist follows logically and needs to be actively pursued by academic teaching institutions. Associated with obvious health care savings, this approach would result in less psychologic trauma for the patients and their families and less potential for human error because the time spent in the hospital is reduced. As is brilliantly exposed in a recent Harvard Business Review article,43 becoming a “learning leader” is a condition sine qua non to adopting new technologies in high-stress, high-risk, and low-error threshold fields such as pediatric cardiac surgery. In that respect, a paradigm shift needs to occur in congenital heart surgery similar to what vascular surgery went through over the past decade. By keeping up with new technology and embracing endovascular techniques, they have been able to reinvent their field and benefit their patients.

References 1. Kitagawa T, Durham LA III, Mosca RS, et al: Techniques and results in the management of multiple ventricular septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:848-856, 1998 2. Myhre U, Duncan BW, Mee RBB, et al: Apical right ventriculotomy for closure of apical ventricular septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg 78:204208, 2004 3. Van Praagh S, Mayer JE Jr, Berman NB, et al: Apical ventricular septal defects: follow-up concerning anatomic and surgical considerations. Ann Thorac Surg 73:48-56, 2002 4. Stellin G, Padalino M, Milanesi O, et al: Surgical closure of apical ventricular septal defects through a right ventricular apical infundibulotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 69:597-601, 2000 5. Takeuchi K, Del Nido PJ: Surgical management of double-outlet right ventricle with subaortic ventricular septal defect. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Ann 3:34-42, 2000 6. Kleinert S, Sano T, Weintraub RG, Mee RBB, et al: Anatomic features and surgical strategies in double-outlet right ventricle. Circulation 96: 1233-1239, 1997 7. Hijazi ZM, Hakim F, Al Fadley F, et al: Transcatheter closure of single muscular ventricular septal defects using the Amplatzer muscular VSD occluder: initial results and technical considerations. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 49:167-172, 2000 8. Holzer R, Balzer D, Cao QL, et al: Device closure of muscular ventricular septal defects using the Amplatzer muscular ventricular septal defect occluder: immediate and mid-term results of a U.S. registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1257-1263, 2004 9. Janorkar S, Goh T, Wilkinson J: Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects using the Rashkind device: Initial experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 46:43-48, 1999 10. Amin Z, Berry JM, Foker JE, et al: Intraoperative closure of muscular ventriocular septal defect in a canine model and application of the technique in a baby. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1374-1376, 1998 11. Bacha EA, Cao QL, Starr JP, et al: Perventricular device closure of muscular ventricular septal defects on the beating heart: Technique and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:1718-1723, 2003 12. Waight DJ, Bacha EA, Kahana M, et al: Catheter therapy of Swiss cheese ventricular septal defects using the Amplatzer muscular VSD occluder. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 55:355-361, 2002 13. Ungerleider RM, Johnston TA, O’Laughlin MP, et al: Intraoperative stents to rehabilitate severely stenotic pulmonary vessels. Ann Thorac Surg 71:476-481, 2001 14. Murphy JD, Sands BL, Norwood WI: Intraoperative balloon angioplasty of aortic coarctation in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Am J Cardiol 59:949-951, 1987 15. Mendelsohn AM, Bove EL, Lupinetti FM, et al: Intraoperative and percutaneous stenting of congenital pulmonary artery and vein stenosis. Circulation 88:210-217, 1993 16. Coles JG, Yemets I, Najm HK, et al: Experience with repair of congenital heart defects using adjunctive endovascular devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110:1513-1520, 1995 17. Burke RP: Video-assisted endoscopy for congenital heart repair. Pediatr Card Surg Ann Semin Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 4:208-215, 2001 18. Ashburn DA, McCrindle BW, Tchervenkov CI, et al: Outcomes after the Norwood operation in neonates with critical aortic stenosis or aortic valve atresia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:1070-1082, 2003 19. Goldberg CS, Schwartz E, Brunberg J, et al: Neurodevelopmental outcome of patients following the Fontan operation: A comparison between children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and other functional single ventricle lesions. J Pediatr 137:646-652, 2000 20. Galli KK, Zimmerman RA, Jarvik GP, et al: Periventricular leukomalacia is common after neonatal cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:692-704, 2004 21. Newburger JW, Wypij D, Bellinger DC, et al: Length of stay after infant heart surgery is related to cognitive outcome at age 8 years. J Pediatr 143:67-73, 2003 22. Pizarro C, Norwood WI: Pulmonary artery banding before Norwood procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 75:1008-1010, 2003

Hybrid procedures in pediatric cardiac surgery 23. Lang P, Norwood WI: Hemodynamic assessment after palliative surgery for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 68:104-108, 1983 24. Gibbs JL, Wren C, Watterson KG, et al: Stenting of the arterial duct combined with banding of the pulmonary arteries and atrial septectomy or septostomy: a new approach to palliation for the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Br Heart J 69:551-555, 1993 25. Akintuerk H, Michael-Behnke I, Valeske K, et al: Stenting of the arterial duct and banding of the pulmonary arteries: Basis for combined Norwood stage 1 and 2 repair in hypoplastic left heart. Circulation 105: 1099-1103, 2002 26. Galantowicz M, Cheatham JP: Fontan completion without surgery. Pediatr Card Surg Ann Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 7:48-55, 2004 27. Hausdorf G, Schneider M, Konertz W: Surgical preconditioning and completion of total cavopulmonary connection by interventional cardiac catheterisation: A new concept. Heart 75:403-409, 1996 28. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al: Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 106:3006-3008, 2002 29. Bonhoeffer P, Boudjemline Y, Saliba Z, et al: Percutaneous valve replacement of pulmonary valve in a right-ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit with valve dysfunction. Lancet 356:1403-1405; 2000 30. von Segesser LK: Direct percutaneous valve replacement: the next step? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:873-874, 2004 31. Lutter G, Kuklinski D, Berg G, et al: Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: an experimental study. I. Studies on implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:768-776, 2002 32. Zhou JQ, Corno AF, Huber CH, et al: Self-expandable valved stent of large size: Off-bypass implantation in pulmonary position. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:212-216, 2003 33. Moazami N, Bessler M, Argenziano M: Transluminal aortic valve place-







39. 40.




ment: A feasibility study with a newly designed collapsible aortic valve. ASAIO J 42:M381-385, 1996 Pawelec-Wojtalik M, Antosik P, Wasiatycz G, et al: Use of muscular VSD Amplatzer occluder for closing right ventricular free wall perforation after hybrid procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:1044-1046, 2004 Xu Z, Ludomirsky A, Eun LY, et al: Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion. IEEE IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 51:726-736, 2004 Schweikert RA, Saliba WI, Tomassoni G, et al: Percutaneous pericardial instrumentation for endo-epicardial mapping of previously failed ablations. Circulation 108:1329-1335, 2003 Amin Z, Danford DA, Lof J, et al: Intraoperative device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects without cardiopulmonary bypass: Preliminary results with the perventricular technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:234-241, 2004 Riviere CN, Patronik NA, Zenati MA: Prototype epicardial crawling device for intrapericardial intervention on the beating heart. Heart Surg Forum 7:37-39, 2004 Cannon JW, Stoll JA, Salgo IS, et al: Real-time three-dimensional ultrasound for guiding surgical tasks. Comput Aided Surg 8:82-90, 2003. Koenig PR, Abdulla RI, Cao QL, et al: Use of intracardiac echocardiography to guide catheter closure of atrial communications. Echocardiography 20:781-787, 2003 Hodaie M, Musharbash A, Otsubo H, et al: Image-guided, frameless stereotactic sectioning of the corpus callosum in children with intractable epilepsy. Pediatr Neurosurg 34:286-294, 2001 Iida H, Lust RM, Spence PA, et al: Feasibility of intraoperative aortic root angiography in the identification of critical coronary lesions. J Invest Surg 4:23-30, 1991 Edmondson A, Bohmer R, Pisano G: Speeding up team learning. Harvard Bus Rev October:5-11, 2001