HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS AND ENDING HOMELESSNESS

HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS AND ENDING HOMELESSNESS Joshua D. Bamberger, MD, MPH [email protected] Sarah Dobbins, MPH San Francisco Department ...
Author: Chastity Rose
0 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS AND ENDING HOMELESSNESS Joshua D. Bamberger, MD, MPH [email protected] Sarah Dobbins, MPH San Francisco Department of Public Health University of California, San Francisco, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine

Outline •  Housing reduces mortality for homeless people with

AIDS •  For high users of healthcare system, it is cheaper to be housed than homeless •  Not all housing is the same •  Characteristics of communities on track to end homelessness •  Leadership role of HCH clinics

Plaza High Utilizer Study •  106 Chronically homeless adults •  Cost year before housing: $3,132,856 •  Cost year after housing: $906,228 •  Reduction in healthcare costs: $2,226,568 •  Cost of program: $1.1million/year •  Reduction in public cost in first year: $1.1 million •  More than 90% of reduction

among 15 tenants who cost more than $50,000/year prior to being housed

The more beautiful the housing the better the outcome

The more beautiful the housing the better the outcome- Windsor

The more beautiful the housing the better the outcome- Plaza

The more beautiful the housing the better the outcome- Mission Creek

The more beautiful the housing the better the outcome- Richardson

The more beautiful the housing the better the outcome- Kelly Cullen Community

The more beautiful the housing the better the outcome- Kelly Cullen Community

The more beautiful the housing the better the outcome- Kelly Cullen Community

Move-out not death 30.0

25.0

20.0

15.0 Move-out not death Linear (Move-out not death) 10.0 R² = 0.76418 5.0

0.0 Windsor Empress

LeNain

PBI

CCR

West

Folsom Dore

Plaza

149 Mason

990 Polk

Mission Creek

Death by Quality of Housing %death

7.6

6.8

5.3 5.0

4.0

3.9 3.5

3.5 3.1 R² = 0.38889

2.7

Windsor

Empress

LeNain

PBI

CCR

West

2.5

Folsom Dore

Plaza

149 Mason

990 Polk Mission Creek

Death rate Le Nain vs. Mission Creek 2006-2011 7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0 Le Nain death % MCSC death % 3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0 Death Rate/year

Case #1 •  48 y/o man w/ many year h/o homelessness •  Experience rectal trauma in 2011 •  Colostomy and colostomy repair, complications •  H/o alcoholism and cocaine use •  Multiple stays in medical respite •  Placed in supportive housing in 2012 •  Chronic back and leg pain with radiographic abnormalities •  First visit to me in 2013 after switching from another clinic •  Reports cocaine use at first visit, “just for my birthday.” •  Refuses utox next visit: “I am not on parole.” •  Denies cocaine use, makes threats to staff

Case #2 •  67 y/o depression, speed use, alcoholism, afib. •  Evicted from supportive housing in 2010 •  Unrelenting stimulant use and alcoholism •  Repeated hospitalization for A. Fib and CHF •  Conserved as gravely disabled •  Placed in locked facility. Released from locked facility •  Drunk and in A. Fib on second day out •  1 year of being on streets, in and out of hospital •  Hospitalized and held for grave disability

POSITIVE OUTLIERS Characteristics of communities on track to end homelessness

POPULATION SNAPSHOT

Veteran PIT Counts, 2009-2012 90,000 80,000

75,609

76,329 67,495

Number of Veterans

70,000

62,619

60,000 50,000

43,409

43,437

Sheltered Veterans

35,143

40,000 30,000

Total Veterans

40,033

Unsheltered Veterans 32,200

32,892

2009

2010

20,000

* 27,462

27,476

2011

2012

10,000 * CoCs only required to conduct a new count of unsheltered homelessness in odd numbered years; in 2012, only 32% of CoCs opted not to do a new unsheltered count, providing an incomplete picture of trends in the number of unsheltered homeless Veterans

Source: PIT data, 2009 - 2012

Number of Homeless Veterans in 5 Communities with Greater than 40% reduction 2010-2012 600 500

512

400

Hennepin

300

310

200

256 223 174

Lexington Tacoma Fort Worth Birmingham -------Projected

100 0 2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Utah  Homeless  Point-­‐In-­‐Time  Count:  2005-­‐2012   18,000  

0.70%   16,522  

16,000  

14,000  

0.60%  

13,690  

15,642  

15,525   14,375   0.53%  

0.52%   13,362  

0.57%  

0.60%  

0.56%  

0.60%   14,351   0.52%   0.50%  

0.46%   11,970  

12,000  

0.40%  

10,000  

8,000   6,785   6,000  

5,565  

7,100  

7,390  

7,105  

0.30%  

6,440  

5,910   5,000  

0.20%  

4,000  

2,000  

1,932  

1,914  

0.10%   1,530  

1,470  

1,400   812  

601  

542  

0  

0.00%   2005   Annualized  Total  Count  

2006  

2007  

Number  of  Persons  in  Families  

Source:  2012  Annualized  Utah  Homeless  Point-­‐In-­‐Time  Count  

2008  

2009  

Number  of  Chronically  Homeless  Persons  

2010  

2011  

2012  

Total  Homeless  Persons  as  %  of  Total  PopulaNon  

Utah Annualized Chronic Homeless Count: 2005-2012 2,500 2,000 1,500

16% 14%

14%

14% 13%

12%

Chronic Count 10%

1,932

10%

1,914 1,530

1,000

9% 1,470

1,400

8% 5% 812

500

6% 4% 601

3%

4%

542

2%

0

0% 2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Source: 2012 Utah Homeless Point-In-Time Count

2010

2011

2012

Veterans in Minneapolis/Hennepin County 2009 2011 300

267

250

224

200

177

150

126

100 50 0 2009

2010

2011

2012

total veterans

Point-in-time count for Minneapolis/Hennepin County Continuum total chronic homeless

total chronic homeless (perecnt of 779

775

24.26 21.84

566

17.59 351

10.36

2009

2010

2011

2012

Characteristics of Positive Outliers •  High level of communication and collaboration

across different pillars of homeless services •  Continuum of care •  Healthcare for the homeless •  Housing Authority •  VA

•  Strong and dynamic leadership •  Commitment to similar philosophy •  Housing First and Harm Reduction

Characteristics of Positive Outliers •  Use of data to inform policy •  SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time-sensitive) •  Targeted intervention •  Chronically homeless = Permanent supportive

housing •  Episodic homeless = Rapid re-housing, homeless prevention

Role of HRSA in Leading HCH Towards Ending Homelessness •  Limited by congressional mandate •  Performance measures already burdensome and difficult to change •  HCH as part of Community Health Centers •  Healthcare for homeless should be held to same

standards as other health centers •  Opportunity for HCH to take lead

Recommendations •  Establish connections across the sectors •  Position HCH as necessary to evaluate who goes

into housing. •  Position HCH as necessary to serve people in supportive housing •  Opportunities for revenue with ACA

•  Establish measureable goals, provide real time

feedback •  Take credit for success •  Repeat…..

HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS AND ENDING HOMELESSNESS Joshua D. Bamberger, MD, MPH [email protected] Sarah Dobbins, MPH San Francisco Department of Public Health University of California, San Francisco, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine

Suggest Documents