Groundwater natural background levels assessment The French approach
Groundwater natural background levels assessment The French approach A. BLUM, L. CHERY (BRGM, French Geological Survey) H. LEGRAND (MEDD, French Minis...
Groundwater natural background levels assessment The French approach A. BLUM, L. CHERY (BRGM, French Geological Survey) H. LEGRAND (MEDD, French Ministry for the Environment)
Water Division European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
Context and main objectives
> Definition : •
Reference state of groundwater quality (without any human influence) …
•
…resulting of natural processes:
•
Concentrations can naturally be very high (even more than drinking water standards)
– Water – rock interactions (sandstones, limestones….) – Processes (leakage, redox conditions, salinity, soil…) – Residence time (a few weeks to several thousand years)
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
>2
Context and main objectives
> Initial needs •
1999 : National Monitoring Network of groundwater quality à how to distinguish natural from anthropogenic elements ? à how to identify the geochemical background of an aquifer?
•
2000 : Water Framework Directive – Further characterisation (article 5 – annexe II.2.2) :” characterisation of the chemical composition of the groundwater […] Member States may use typologies for groundwater characterisation when establishing natural background levels” – Future Groundwater Daughter Directive : except for Nitrates and Pesticides, Member States will have to identify thresholds values for the definition of “good chemical status”
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
>3
Context and main objectives
> The project (1999 – 2005) • •
Water Agencies + French Ministry for the Environment Main outlines: 1) State of the art on geochemical baseline of French aquifers : major elements, trace elements, natural processes 2) Methodology 3) Application on 4 different case studies
Crystalline basement
Alluvial
Volcanism
Jurassic limestones European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
>4
State of the art – Major elements
> Review of the literature • •
Review of natural background levels (NBL) in French aquifers Expected levels of each type of aquifer
> Statistical analysis • •
To define the typical composition of each type of aquifer Based on the data available in the French national groundwater database (ADES)
www.ades.eaufrance.fr
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
>5
State of the art – Major elements
> •
A selection of the data has been necessary Selected data
– NO36
State of the art – Major elements
> Typology based on four levels of criteria • • • •
Lithology (sandstones, sands, limestones, chalk, crystalline, basalts) Nitrates concentration Distance to the seaside (> ou < 100 km) Confined/unconfined Chloride concentrations in rainfalls
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
>7
State of the art – Major elements Statistical results Unconfined limestones, NO3 < 10mg/L, distance from the coast > 100 km
Location of sampling sites
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
Schoeller and Piper diagram of the median values
>8
State of the art – Trace elements
> Statistical analysis • •
Useful but… … not absolutely representative : – deterioration of the borehole, point source pollution,…) – Analytical performance are often not sufficient to have data of “good quality” (limits of quantification too high)
> Literature review • •
Exhaustive (mostly in France but not only) Main goal : identify the most favourable geological context of each element
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
>9
State of the art – Trace elements
+++ very common, a part or the whole aquifer ++ relatively common European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
absence
+ very occasional - absence or very rare > 10
Proposed methodology
> A step by step approach… …that can easily be applied by water managers
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
> 11
Proposed methodology
> 3 levels of application •
“predictive application”: to know the geochemical background of lowly documented area
•
“subtractive application”: to get back to the natural geochemical background of an anthropised aquifer
•
“prospective application”: to give recommendations or guidelines for a better calibration of the measurement networks according to their purpose.
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
> 12
Proposed methodology
> Results reported in one single book Chery, 2006. Qualité naturelle des eaux souterraines : méthodologie de caractérisation des états de référence des aquifères français. Collection Technique. Ed. BRGM.
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
> 13
Proposed methodology
Lithology NO3 concentration Confined / unconfined
Distance to the coast
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
> 14
Conclusions and further steps
> Support to French policy makers • •
Definition of the groundwater bodies “good chemical status” Mapping of the high natural background levels zones regarding trace elements
European Groundwater Conference 2006 – Vienna
> 15
Conclusions and further steps
> BRIDGE •
Sharing “European” experiences to build a common methodology to derive the “threshold values” required by the Groundwater Daughter Directive
> Challenges for the coming years • •
Apply the methodology on each groundwater body Improve the knowledge on natural geochemical background levels of trace elements – Improving the monitoring networks pertinence – Leading local studies