Grape Industry Analysis for Investment and Redevelopment
FINAL REPORT 15 September 2014
Project lead Mildura Development Corporation
Project contributors Regional Development Victoria, Mildura Development Corporation, Dried Fruits Australia, Australian Table Grape Association and Murray Valley Winegrowers’
Authors
Sue Argus and Alison MacGregor, SunRISE Mapping and Research
a division of Mallee Family Care Inc. Postal Address: PO Box 1870, Mildura VIC 3502 Telephone: (03) 5021 7492 international + 61 3 5021 7492 Facsimile: (03) 5021 4455 international + 61 3 5021 4455 Email:
[email protected] Internet: http://www.sunrisemapping.org.au
SunRISE mapping & research
Acknowledgments The following are acknowledged for their contribution to the study: •
Sunbeam Foods
•
Australian Premium Dried Fruits
•
Andrew Nemtsas, Murray River Organics
•
Australian Vintage
•
Sunworld for information on proprietary varieties
•
Sheehan Genetics for information on proprietary varieties
•
Murray Valley irrigators for their participation in the SunRISE mapping program
Disclaimer Information in this report is derived from analysis of data from a range of sources. The report may be of assistance to you but SunRISE Mapping and Research and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this report.
Contents 1.
Summary
6
2.
Introduction
9
2.1 2.2
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Study area Project background and consultant’s brief
10 11
Data sources and method
12
3.1 3.2 3.3
12 13 14
SunRISE crop data acquisition and accuracy Source of crop production and crop prices data Limitations
Murray Valley grape plantings 1997 to 2014
15
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Change in wine, table & dried plantings 1997 to 2014 Summary of grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Value of grape production in the Murray Valley Farm gate value of wine, table and dried grapes Change in irrigation methods 1997 to 2014 Change in rootstocks 1997 to 2014 Change in property numbers and size 1997 to 2014
Wine grape industry analysis
23
5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8
23 28 29 30 34 36 37 38
Change in wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Wine grape production 1997 to 2014 Wine grape plantings yet to come into production Wine grape prices 1997 to 2014 Crop value of wine grapes 1997 to 2014 Irrigation methods for wine grape plantings Rootstocks of wine grape plantings 1997 to 2014 Wine grape property numbers and size 1997 to 2014
Dried grape industry analysis
39
6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8
39 42 43 44 46 48 49 50
Change in dried grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Dried grape production 1997 to 2014 Dried grape plantings yet to come into production Dried grape prices 1997 to 2014 Crop value of dried grapes 1997 to 2014 Irrigation methods for dried grape plantings Rootstocks of dried grape plantings 1997 to 2014 Dried grape property numbers and size 1997 to 2014
Table grape industry analysis
51
7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8
51 54 55 57 60 62 63 64
Change in table grape plantings 1997 to 2014 Table grape production from 1997 to 2014 Table grape plantings yet to come into production Table grape prices 1997 to 2014 Crop value of table grapes 1997 to 2014 Irrigation methods for table grape plantings Rootstocks of table grape plantings 1997 to 2014 Table grape property numbers and size 1997 to 2014
Bibliography
SunRISE Mapping & Research
65
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 3 of 65
List of figures Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Figure 4: Figure 5: Figure 6: Figure 7: Figure 8: Figure 9: Figure 10: Figure 11: Figure 12: Figure 13: Figure 14: Figure 15: Figure 16: Figure 17: Figure 18: Figure 19: Figure 20: Figure 21: Figure 22: Figure 23: Figure 24: Figure 25: Figure 26: Figure 27: Figure 28: Figure 29: Figure 30: Figure 31: Figure 32: Figure 33: Figure 34: Figure 35: Figure 36: Figure 37: Figure 38: Figure 39: Figure 40: Figure 41: Figure 42: Figure 43: Figure 44:
Map of the study area Hectares of wine, table and dried grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 Summary of changes in grape varieties and areas (hectares) from 1997 to 2014 Crop value ($ million) of Murray Valley wine, table and dried grapes 1997 to 2014 Farm gate value (weighted average $/hectare) of wine, dried and table grapes Change in irrigation methods for Murray Valley grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 Change in rootstocks of grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 Change in property numbers and size 1997 to 2014 Grape growing properties in 2014 Summary of wine, table and dried grape property numbers and average property size Change in wine grape plantings (hectares) from 1997 to 2014 Hectares of bearing and non-bearing white wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Hectares of bearing and non-bearing red wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Area (hectares) planted to white wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Area (hectares) planted to red wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Average yield (tonnes/hectare) from bearing wine grape plantings 1997 to 2014 Projected tonnage from wine grape plantings that were non-bearing in 2014 Weighted average price ($/tonne) for wine grapes from the Murray Valley Average prices ($/tonne) for white wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Average prices paid for red wine grape varieties ($/tonne) 1997 to 2014 Trends in the planted hectares of Murray Valley wine grapes as prices fluctuate Crop value ($ million) from Murray Valley wine grape crush surveys 1997 to 2014 Change in farm gate value ($/hectare) of wine grapes from 1997 to 2014 Change in irrigation methods for wine grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 Change in rootstocks of wine grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 Change in property numbers and size of wine grape properties from 1997 to 2014 Wine grape properties in 2014 Summary of bearing and non-bearing dried grape plantings Hectares of bearing and non-bearing dried grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Change in hectares of dried grape varieties from 1997 to 2014 Dried grapes from the Murray Valley (tonnes) delivered to packers 1997 to 2013 Average yields (dried tonnes/ha) for dried grape fruit 1997 to 2013 Projected tonnage from dried grape varieties that were non-bearing in 2014 Weighted average price ($/dried tonne) for dried grape fruit from 1997 to 2013, and estimated prices for 2014 Trends in planted hectares of dried grapes as prices fluctuate Regional income ($ million) from dried grape fruit based on intake data and 2014 estimates Farm gate value or gross income ($/hectare) for dried grape fruit 1997 to 2014 Change in irrigation methods for dried grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 Change in rootstocks of dried grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 Property numbers and average size of dried grape properties 1997 to 2014 Dried grape properties in 2014 Summary of bearing and non-bearing table grape plantings (hectares) 1997 to 2014 Hectares of bearing and non-bearing table grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Change in table grape varieties (hectares) 1997 to 2014
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
10 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 38 39 40 41 42 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 50 51 52 53
Page 4 of 65
Figure 45: Figure 46: Figure 47: Figure 48: Figure 49: Figure 50: Figure 51: Figure 52: Figure 53: Figure 54: Figure 55: Figure 56:
Annual production estimate (tonnes) of table grapes 1997 to 2014 54 Seasonality of bearing and non-bearing table grape varieties in 2014 55 Projected tonnage from table grape varieties that were non-bearing in 2014 56 Average wholesale price ($ per kilogram) for table grapes delivered into Melbourne and Sydney markets 1997 to 2014 57 Monthly average wholesale prices ($ per kilogram) for table grapes at Melbourne and Sydney markets between January and April, 1997 to 2014 58 Trends in planted hectares of table grapes as prices fluctuate 59 Regional income ($ million) from table grapes 1997 to 2014 60 Changes in farm gate value (weighted average $/ha) of table grapes 1997 to 2014 61 Change in irrigation methods for table grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 62 Change in rootstocks of table grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 63 Change in property numbers and size for table grape growers from 1997 to 2014 64 Table grape properties in 2014 64
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 5 of 65
1. Summary The study area, referred to as the ‘Murray Valley’ in this report, encompasses the Lower Murray Darling region of Victoria and New South Wales (Figure 1). The region has over 1,200 growers producing wine, table and dried grapes from 31,085 hectares of grapevines. This report tracks the three industries over the past seventeen years with respect to grape varieties, hectares (bearing and non-bearing), production (tonnes), yields (tonnes/ha), prices, crop value ($ million), farm gate value ($/ha), irrigation methods, rootstocks, grower numbers and property sizes. With over-supply of wine grapes still an issue, the table grape industry on the rise and the dried grape industry looking to increase its production base, an understanding of development and investment over the past seventeen years will better inform future investment and adjustment in response to changing markets and growing conditions.
Non-bearing (new and redeveloped) plantings In 1997, 22% (5,980 ha) of grapevine plantings were non-bearing (less than three years old). This high proportion of new (including redeveloped) plantings was fuelled by the wine grape boom, with 4,640 ha of the non-bearing plantings being wine grape varieties (Figure 2). Possibly high wine grape prices in the late 1990’s also assisted investment in dried and table grapes as there were 1,845 ha of non-bearing table grape plantings in 2003 and 1,135 ha of dried grape plantings; the largest areas of new table and dried grape plantings compared with the 1997, 2006, 2009 and 2014 seasons. New dried grape plantings in the early 2000’s would also coincide with conversion to trellis drying. By 2014, only 8% (2,420 ha) of all plantings were non-bearing. 69% of the non-bearing plantings were table grape varieties (1,670 ha); predominantly Crimson Seedless (Figure 43). Production from the 2014 non-bearing table grape plantings represents a 24% (40,080 tonnes) increase on 2014 production from bearing plantings (170,040 tonnes) (Figure 47).
Grape varieties Diversification to new grape varieties is evident in the study region. New dried grape varieties include Sunmuscat, Sunglo, Diamond Muscat, Black Gem, Selma Pete and Summer Muscat. Wine grape varieties new to the region include Pinot Gris, Fiano, Montepulciano, Nero d’Avola and other Muscat and Italian varieties. New table grape varieties include Autumn Royal, Ralli Seedless, Crimson Seedless and a range of proprietary varieties. The dominant grape varieties (52% of plantings) are Chardonnay (5,145 ha), Sultana/Thompson Seedless (4,159 ha), Shiraz (3,576 ha) and Crimson Seedless (3,377 ha) (Figure 3). Sultana (including Thompson Seedless) plantings decreased by 10,289 ha between 1997 and 2014. As there were around 2,000 ha of new Sultana plantings in this period, 12,289 ha of old Sultana plantings were removed. Crimson Seedless plantings increased by 3,329 ha between 1997 and 2014. This was the most popular variety followed by Shiraz (an increase of 2,290 ha) and Chardonnay (2,114 ha).
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 6 of 65
Yields The average yield in 2014 across all wine grapes was 23 tonnes/ha, based on the 2014 Wine Grape Crush Report (tonnes) and SunRISE crop mapping (hectares). Average wine grape yields ranged from 18 to 23 tonnes/ha in the seasons 1997, 2003, 2006 and 2009 (Figure 16). Average dried grape yields across the region ranged from 3.6 to 6.0 dried tonnes per ha, based on intake tonnages and SunRISE crop mapping (Figure 32). Table grape production was estimated based on average yields of 20 kg/vine from 1,200 vines/ha. The greatest increase in production between 1997 and 2014 was in mid- to late-season red grape varieties; an estimated increase of 59,534 tonnes (Figure 45). There was a significant decrease in mid-season white table grape production estimated at 22,817 tonnes between 1997 and 2014.
Prices Prices for wine grapes purchased from the Murray Valley decreased by 59% for red grape varieties and by 33% for white grape varieties between 1997 and 2014 (Figure 18). The weighted average price for dried grapes increased from $1,431 per dried tonne in 1997 to an estimated $1,700 per dried tonne in 2014 (Figure 34). Average prices returned to table grape growers from the wholesale markets increased overall by $0.20 between 1997 and 2014 (Figure 48). The greatest price increase ($0.79) was for black grapes. The price of white grapes between 1997 and 2014 fell by $0.18.
Crop value ($ million) The estimated crop value of Murray Valley wine, table and dried grapes totalled $362 million in 2014 (Figure 4). Crop value has increased by $101 million (39%) since 1997. Wine grapes accounted for 35% of the crop value of Murray Valley grapes in 2014, dried grapes 9% and table grapes 56%.
Farm gate value ($/ha) Farm gate value of wine grapes declined by 37%; from $11,300/ha in 1997 to $7,100/ha in 2014. For dried and table grapes it increased in the same period by 66% and 19% respectively (Figure 5)
Irrigation methods Murray Valley grapevines are predominantly (89%) irrigated with drippers or low level sprinklers (Figure 6). The dominant irrigation method was furrow in 1997; however this changed to drippers by 2003. In 2014 wine and dried grape plantings were predominantly drip irrigated, and table grape plantings predominantly irrigated with low level sprinklers (Figure 24, Figure 38 and Figure 53).
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 7 of 65
Rootstocks The proportion of Murray Valley grape plantings on a rootstock increased from 30% in 1997 to 71% in 2014 (page 20). The dominant rootstocks are Ramsey (33% of grape plantings), Schwarzmann (13%) and Paulsen 1103 (10%) (Figure 7). 67% of wine grape plantings are on a rootstock (Figure 25), 69% of dried grape plantings are on a rootstock (Figure 39) and 81% of table grape plantings are on a rootstock (Figure 54).
Grower numbers and property size From 1997 to 2014 grower numbers declined from an estimated 2,445 to 1,277 properties, while average property size (grapevine area) increased by 119%, from 11.1 ha to 24.3 ha per property (Figure 8).
In 2014, 24% of grape properties were over 20 ha, growing 75% of grape plantings (Figure 9). 31% of properties growing wine grapes also produce table and/or dried grapes (page 38). 43% of properties growing dried grapes also produce wine and/or table grapes (page 50). 25% of properties growing table grapes also produce wine and/or dried grapes (page 64).
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 8 of 65
2. Introduction Mildura Development Corporation has a vision of “Our Region. Our Prosperity.” To achieve this, it is important that we maintain a detailed understanding of the horticultural commodities that provide a significant contribution to the prosperity of the region. To that end, Mildura Development Corporation’s 2013-16 Strategic Plan includes a goal to facilitate regional innovation and business development, which we do by working with industry and business to facilitate growth in our region, making economic and statistical research on the region available, identifying investment opportunities through proactive research, assisting in building vibrant and sustainable communities by making such research accessible, and supporting innovative alliances to encourage business development. Grape industries in the Lower Murray Darling have experienced fluctuating conditions in the recent decade (wine glut, drought, abnormal climatic events, low water allocations, rocketing of temporary water prices, flooding, water buyback and exit grants, a high Australian dollar, and opening of markets in China). Significant changes in planting areas, varieties, water use, rootstocks, property numbers and size, and irrigation methods are evident across the region’s horticulture (Mallee CMA 2012 Crop Report and 2012 Irrigated Horticulture of the Lower MurrayDarling (SunRISE 21, 2012)). With 31,085 hectares of grapevines planted in the region and a further 10,000 hectares of vacant, irrigable land that has the potential to be brought back into production, it is critical to collate accurate and comparative information for sound investment and planning decisions, to assist new investors coming into the region and existing growers transitioning between wine, table and dried viticulture, or diversifying to other crop types. In particular, a focus on varietal mix and tonnage projections, based on current and potential plantings, was required to inform industries’ planning and marketing strategies. In 2014 the Mildura Development Corporation in collaboration with Regional Development Victoria and the three grape industry bodies, contracted SunRISE Mapping and Research to conduct an industry position analysis of grape crops across the three industry sectors in the Lower Murray Darling region of Victoria and New South Wales. The analysis is based on SunRISE crop databases (1997 to 2014) obtained from mapping of irrigated crops utilising orthophoto imagery (scale accurate, digital, aerial photography), grower input and industry collaboration.
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 9 of 65
2.1 Study area This report covers grapevine plantings in the Lower Murray Darling region of Victoria and New South Wales (Figure 1). The study area is referred to as the ‘Murray Valley’ in this report. It encompasses the Murray Darling and Swan Hill wine regions as well as plantings along the Darling River upstream to Menindee. Figure 1:
Map of the study area
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 10 of 65
2.2 Project background and consultant’s brief Irrigated horticulture in the Lower Murray Darling is recovering from a decade of extreme conditions. New export market opportunities are fuelling confidence in the industry, with redevelopment and new investment occurring across different irrigated commodities, and rapid expansion particularly in table grape varieties. Accurate and detailed industry data is required to inform investment and redevelopment. With the promise of modernised irrigation delivery in the Older Irrigated Areas of Merbein, Mildura and Red Cliffs, this information will be critical to redevelopment and new investment in viticulture. The launch of the National Food Plan and its focus on Asia, will also deliver new investment into horticultural production as markets grow into the next decade. Changes to plantings in each industry (investments, redevelopment) will underlie the economic success of each industry. Clarity on plantings is required to inform decision making, paramount to a sustainable recovery, avoidance of another ‘boom and bust’ scenario, and sustainable growth within each industry. Significant changes in planting areas, varieties, water use, rootstocks, property numbers and size, and irrigation methods are already evident across the region’s horticulture (Mallee CMA 2012 Crop Report and 2012 Irrigated Horticulture of the Lower Murray-Darling (SunRISE 21, 2012)) although those Crop Reports did not provide analysis to the grape variety level. Similarly, data on grape plantings from the state government, industry bodies and ABS census data are not available to the variety level. Each of the Murray Darling grape industry sectors has conducted their own analyses, but not using consistent types or sources of information. This report represents the first coordinated analysis of data to the grape variety level, including irrigation and cultural management details. The SunRISE crop database includes planting details from 1997 to 2014. The crop mapping provides accurate areas as it is based on a time series of high resolution orthophoto imagery (scale accurate, digital, aerial photography). Crop details, such as crop type, area and irrigation method, are derived from input from irrigators, field surveys and visual interpretation of the imagery. The analysis encompasses grape plantings in the lower Murray-Darling region of Victoria and New South Wales (Figure 1). The region is referred to as the ‘Murray Valley’ in this report. 2014 planting data is compared in this report with data from 1997, 2003, 2006 and 2009.
The Brief SunRISE Mapping and Research was contracted to collect, collate and report on: 1. grape variety data in collaboration with dried, wine and table grape growers and industry groups, with at least 80% of each industry surveyed to the variety level 2. changes in plantings between 1997 and 2014, by variety, property numbers & size, vine ages, irrigation methods, rootstocks and new plantings for each of the three industries (wine, table & dried) 3. average production and crop (farm gate) values 4. production projections for dominant varieties, and by seasonality for table grapes
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 11 of 65
3. Data sources and method 3.1 SunRISE crop data acquisition and accuracy SunRISE crop mapping SunRISE crop mapping is based on high resolution orthophoto imagery (i.e. scale accurate digital imagery processed from aerial photography) which has been updated every three years since 1997. The scale accurate imagery provides accurate areas. Crop database details such as ownership, crop type, variety, rootstock, irrigation method and year planted are acquired by a combination of: •
Interpretation of orthophoto imagery and field surveys
•
Preparation of property crop maps for Sunbeam Foods contracted growers
•
Preparation of property crop maps for Australia Premium Dried Fruits contracted growers
•
Preparation of property crop maps for table grape export registration
•
Public domain real estate sales information
•
Preparation of property maps for growers for property planning and management; irrigation design, soil surveys, quality assurance, redevelopment.
65% of the Murray Valley’s 1,277 grape growers have had input to the databases within the last three years. 90% of growers have been surveyed since inception of the mapping system in 1997. The imagery is used to identify changes to crops. When a change in planting is identified from the imagery the crop variety is recorded as ‘not surveyed’ and the approximate year of change recorded. Hence, crop details for growers who have not been surveyed recently will have crop variety details recorded for plantings that don’t appear to have changed since the survey and ‘not surveyed’ recorded for plantings that appear to have changed since the survey. When details are received for crops previously ‘not surveyed’ the earlier databases are back filled where relevant.
Orthophoto imagery Information presented in this report is for the years 1997, 2003, 2006, 2009 and 2014. The orthophoto imagery used as a map base for each of these years was captured at the start of the year. Hence the information represents the 1996-97, 2002-03, 2005-06, 2008-09 and 2013-14 irrigation seasons respectively. The imagery is high resolution, generally 35cm or 30cm pixels. Every crop patch is checked against the imagery time series to ensure changes are correctly recorded. The imagery from 1997 to 2009 is the property of SunRISE Mapping and was acquired in collaboration with regional agencies. 2013 and 2014 imagery was sourced from Google Earth and from NearMap via a web portal.
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 12 of 65
3.2 Source of crop production and crop prices data Wine grapes Wine grape production and price data was sourced from public domain data: •
Murray Valley Winegrape Utilisation Survey 1997 (Agriculture Victoria, 1997)
•
Murray Valley Winegrape Utilisation Survey 2003 (Department of Primary Industries, 2003),
•
Australian Regional Wine Grape Crush Survey Murray Darling, Swan Hill 2006 (Department of Primary Industries, 2006),
•
Wine Grape Crush Survey Murray Darling / Swan Hill 2009 (Department of Primary Industries, 2009)
•
Wine Grape Crush Report Murray Darling Swan Hill 2014 (Hickey & Hengsen, 2014)
Dried grapes Dried grape production and price data was sourced from Sunbeam Foods, and from Horticulture Australia via Dried Fruits Australia.
Table grapes Table grape production was estimated based on an assumption of 1,200 vines per hectare yielding an average of 2 boxes per vine in full production (i.e. 2,400 boxes per hectare or 970 boxes per acre). Table grape prices were sourced from Ausmarket Consultants (2014) based on average prices ($/box): •
for each grape variety
•
for grapes sourced from the Murray Valley (Victoria and NSW)
•
for grapes sent to Sydney and Melbourne markets in the months January to April inclusive, for the years 1997, 2003, 2006, 2009 and 2014
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 13 of 65
3.3 Limitations Extrapolation of SunRISE crop data Information on grape varieties, irrigation methods, rootstocks and property ownership are derived from analyses of the SunRISE crop databases and extrapolation for unknown (‘not surveyed’) records. At least 80% of crop varieties are recorded for each year (1997, 2003, 2006, 2009 and 2014) with the exception of: •
2014 non-bearing wine grape varieties where only 25% of non-bearing varieties are recorded. The 2014 non-bearing wine grape varieties have not been extrapolated (Figure 12, Figure 14, Figure 13 and Figure 15).
•
2014 non-bearing table grape varieties where only 62% of non-bearing varieties are recorded. The 2014 non-bearing table grape varieties were still extrapolated (Figure 43).
At least 70% of crop rootstocks are recorded for each year (1997, 2003, 2006, 2009 and 2014) with the exception of: •
2009 and 2014 table grape plantings where only 63% and 54% respectively of rootstocks are recorded. The 2009 and 2014 table grape rootstock data was still extrapolated (Figure 54).
Areas and varieties of non-bearing plantings (less than three years old) are provided however the areas are likely to be under-stated as not all new and redeveloped plantings will have been recorded. SunRISE relies on visual identification of changes to plantings from the imagery and from information provided by growers.
Multi use varieties Total areas (hectares) of grapevine plantings for each year in this report are accurate as they are mapped from scale accurate high resolution imagery. However, the area split for multi-use varieties, such as Gordo and Sultana, between the three markets (wine, table and dried) can be subject to error. Given that there are large areas of multi-use varieties their influence on total wine/dried/table areas can be significant. Without direct input from a grower on the market for their produce in a given season, SunRISE uses the history of the growers produce types, trellising details, crop prices etc. to assess the likely market that the fruit was consigned to. Also, the imagery provides visual clues as to produce type; such as white plastic covers over table grapes, smaller canopy on wine grape plantings and the patterning of canopy on a Shaw trellis for drying is often distinct.
Area harvested versus area planted Areas (hectares) stated in this report are the areas planted, not the area harvested. No attempt has been made to determine the proportion of crop not harvested in each of the seasons presented. Production and crop value estimates are based on all bearing plantings having been harvested, whereas this is not necessarily the case.
Property numbers Property numbers are estimates only. In the SunRISE crop databases a ‘property’ is a corporate entity or family business where the family business can encompass multiple farms and family members. However, ‘property’ names are entered into the crop database as specified by growers and they may represent individual family members rather than the family company. This would suggest that property numbers are over stated in the analysis. SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 14 of 65
4. Murray Valley grape plantings 1997 to 2014 4.1 Change in wine, table & dried plantings 1997 to 2014 Figure 2 summarises bearing and non-bearing hectares of wine, table and dried grape plantings across the Murray Valley from 1997 to 2014. • New plantings and redevelopment in the vineyard has slowed considerably since 1997. While 22% of plantings were non-bearing in 1997, only 8% were non-bearing in 2014. •
The largest area of non-bearing plantings in 2014 was table grape plantings (1,670 hectares).
•
There were 4,400 hectares of non-bearing wine grape plantings in 2006, despite falling grape prices; however the ensuing years of continued oversupply, low prices, drought and low water allocations saw non-bearing wine grape plantings decline to just 530 hectares by 2014. Nonbearing wine grape plantings in 2014 are predominantly on large corporate holdings.
•
The large area (1,135 hectares) of non-bearing dried grape plantings in 2003 is mostly Sultana, Sunmuscat and Carina plantings coinciding with the removal of over 2,000 hectares of old Sultana plantings between 1997 and 2003. Possibly income generated from the wine grape boom assisted redevelopment of dried grape plantings along with conversion to trellis drying.
Figure 2:
Hectares of wine, table and dried grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
40,000 35,000 Wine non-bearing
hectares
30,000
Wine bearing
25,000
Table non-bearing
20,000
Table bearing 15,000
Dried non-bearing
10,000
Dried bearing
5,000 0 Grapes Wine
1997
2003
2006
2009
% of 2014 Change (ha) total 1997-2014 18,220 59% +9,130
2014
Bearing
9,090
17,260
19,400
19,805
Non-bearing
4,640
4,430
4,400
2,120
530
2%
-4,110
4,630
5,840
6,465
6,225
7,085
23%
+2,455
910
1,845
1,575
1,095
1,670
5%
+760
7,520
4,995
4,835
3,455
3,360
11%
-4,160
430
1,135
400
185
220
1%
-210
27,220
35,505
37,075
32,885
31,085
100%
+3,865
% Bearing
78%
79%
83%
90%
92%
% Non-bearing
22%
21%
17%
10%
8%
Table Bearing Non-bearing Dried Bearing Non-bearing Total hectares
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 15 of 65
4.2 Summary of grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Figure 3 lists the main grape varieties grown in the Murray Valley region and the change in hectares from 1997 to 2014. Significant changes in this period were: •
The area of Sultana/Thompson Seedless plantings decreased by 10,289 hectares. (Over 12,290 hectares of Sultanas were removed as there was at least 2,000 hectares of new Sultana plantings between 1997 and 2014)
•
The area of Crimson Seedless increased by 3,329 hectares
•
52% of plantings in 2014 comprised four varieties; Chardonnay (5,145 ha), Sultana/Thompson Seedless (4,159 ha), Shiraz (3,576 ha) and Crimson Seedless (3,377 ha)
Figure 3:
Dried
Multiuse
Table black Table red Table Table
Wine red
Wine white
Wine
Summary of changes in grape varieties and areas (hectares) from 1997 to 2014 Variety
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
Other dried Black Muscat Carina Flame Seedless Gordo Menindee Seedless Merbein Seedless Sultana/Thompson Sunmuscat Waltham Zante Autumn Royal Other black Crimson Seedless Other red Ralli Seedless Red Globe Other white 1 PBR varieties Cab. Sauvignon Merlot Other red Pinot Noir Ruby Cabernet Shiraz Chardonnay Colombard Other white Pinot Grigio/Gris Sauvignon Blanc Semillon Not surveyed
3 18 251 171 1,551 905 49 14,448 17 282 390 0 88 48 309 38 842 350 4 1,077 379 172 12 255 1,287 3,031 446 352 0 99 346 -
10 22 285 170 1,262 1,326 36 10,179 364 144 205 13 66 808 231 112 1,513 400 15 3,463 1,900 565 136 571 3,749 5,784 1,050 454 38 155 480 -
35 16 413 152 1,291 1,266 33 7,499 442 102 136 243 77 1,259 297 122 1,496 585 52 3,295 2,104 564 209 444 4,280 7,439 1,046 559 570 513 535 -
36 14 357 113 1,306 1,074 24 4,660 480 48 35 348 68 1,889 68 109 1,271 263 142 2,990 1,907 595 284 326 4,089 6,414 1,017 704 827 892 534 -
124 15 363 173 1,004 915 15 4,159 606 34 26 354 55 3,377 30 210 1,042 151 597 2,629 1,664 560 292 225 3,576 5,145 660 566 808 836 476 397
Total hectares
27,220
35,505
37,075
32,885
31,085
% of Change 2014 1997-2014 0% +121 0% -4 1% +112 1% +3 3% -547 3% +10 0% -34 13% -10,289 2% +589 0% -249 0% -364 1% +354 0% -33 11% +3,329 0% -279 1% +171 3% +200 0% -198 2% +593 8% +1,553 5% +1,285 2% +388 1% +280 1% -30 12% +2,290 17% +2,114 2% +214 2% +214 3% +808 3% +737 2% +129 1% +397 100%
+3,865
1
PBR (Plant Breeders’ Rights) in this table refers to proprietary varieties only recently, or still waiting to be, granted plant variety rights
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 16 of 65
4.3 Value of grape production in the Murray Valley Figure 4 summarises crop values for wine grapes (Figure 22), dried grapes (Figure 36) and table grapes (Figure 51) and provides an estimate of the total value of the grape industry in the Murray Valley region from 1997 to 2014.
Crop value of Murray Valley grape production increased by 39% ($101 million); from $261 million in 1997 to $362 million in 2014. Wine grapes account for 35% of the 2014 Murray Valley grape crop value, dried grape fruit 9% and table grapes 56%.
Figure 4:
Crop value ($ million) of Murray Valley wine, table and dried grapes 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
$143
$183
2009
2014
$180
$202
Value of grapes ($ million dollars)
$400
$300
$200
$117
Total dried
$25 $36
$100
$30
$31
$155
$139
$129
2006
2009
2014
$41 $184
Total table
$103
Total wine
$0
White wine
$79.8
$101.6
$87.1
$72.3
$70.3
% of 2014 total 19%
Red wine
$23.0
$82.4
$68.3
$66.3
$59.0
16%
$102.7
$184.0
$155.3
$138.6
$129.4
$33.3
$18.2
$27.9
$21.9
$18.8
5%
- $14.5
-
$1.2
$2.3
$2.9
$5.5
2%
+ $4.3
Raisins
$3.4
$2.2
$2.1
$2.0
$1.9
1%
- $1.5
Currants
$4.5
$3.8
$3.4
$3.5
$4.2
1%
- $0.3
-
$0.1
$0.1
$0.0
$0.1
0%
+ 0.0
Total dried value
$41.2
$25.4
$35.9
$30.4
$30.6
White table
$90.6
$94.6
$98.8
$73.6
$58.6
16%
- $32.0
Red table
$25.0
$46.8
$81.3
$94.3
$123.2
34%
+ $98.2
Black table
$1.7
$2.0
$2.4
$12.3
$20.3
6%
+ $18.6
$117.3
$143.3
$182.5
$180.3
$202.1
$261
$353
$374
$349
$362
Grapes
Total wine value Sultanas
1997
Sunmuscat
Other
Total table value Murray Valley income ($ million)
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2003
Grape Industry Analysis
Change 1997-2014 - $9.4 + $36.1 + $26.6
- $10.6
+ $84.8 100%
+ $101
Page 17 of 65
4.4 Farm gate value of wine, table and dried grapes Figure 5 shows the change in farm gate value of wine, dried and table grapes from 1997 to 2014. (Values are summarised from Figure 23, Figure 37 and Figure 52 respectively.) Farm gate value ($/hectare) represents the gross return to growers before deducting costs of production. Costs of production are not considered in this analysis (and are not a part of the project brief), but they vary for wine, dried and table grape production and vary over time having a significant impact on net income. For instance, while farm gate value of table grapes is much higher than wine and dried grapes, table grapes have considerably higher production costs impacting on net income. Information on costs of production can be sourced from relevant industry groups.
Farm gate value of wine grapes declined by 37%; from $11,300 per hectare in 1997 to $7,100 per hectare in 2014. Farm gate values of sultanas, sunmuscats, raisins and currants increased between 1997 and 2014, with a 66% increase overall for dried grapes. Farm gate value of white table grapes decreased in the same period by 17%, but red and black table grapes increased by 31% and 88% respectively.
Figure 5:
Farm gate value (weighted average $/hectare) of wine, dried and table grapes
WINE
Grapes
2003
2006
2009
2014
$10,127
$12,257
$9,058
$7,089
$7,528
-26%
-$2,599
$18,917
$9,180
$6,975
$6,901
$6,650
-65%
-$12,267
$11,300
$10,658
$8,007
$6,998
$7,100
-37%
- 4,200
$5,031
$4,269
$7,150
$8,749
$8,300
+65%
+$3,269
-
$8,289
$6,469
$6,882
$10,313
+24%
+$2,024
Raisins
$8,048
$8,677
$11,172
$11,709
$10,877
+35%
+$2,829
Currants
$9,867
$11,171
$9,301
$10,033
$11,326
+15%
+$1,460
-
$7,046
$6,782
$14,676
$14,924
+112%
+$7,878
$5,479
$5,076
$7,422
$8,802
$9,104
+66%
+$3,625
White table
$25,409
$27,318
$24,468
$20,145
$21,112
-17%
-$4,246
Red table
$25,506
$26,304
$31,359
$36,533
$33,295
+31%
+$8,224
Black table
$21,474
$26,659
$30,577
$33,624
$40,396
+88%
+$18,180
$24,657
$26,728
$28,859
$31,625
$29,425
+19%
+$4,768
White wine
Red wine $/hectare wine grapes
DRIED
Sultanas Sunmuscat
Other dried $/hectare dried grapes TABLE
Change 1997-2014 % $/ha
1997
$/hectare table grapes
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 18 of 65
4.5 Change in irrigation methods 1997 to 2014 Figure 6 summarises irrigation methods for grapevines across the Murray Valley from 1997 to 2014. The dominant irrigation method changed from furrow irrigation to drip irrigation between 1997 and 2003. 89% of grapevines are irrigated with drippers or low-level sprinklers.
Figure 6:
Change in irrigation methods for Murray Valley grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
40,000
Hectares
30,000
Drip Low level
20,000
Overhead Furrow
10,000 0 Irrigation method
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
% of 2014 total
Change (ha) 1997-2014
Drip
3,880
11,885
16,515
19,950
21,420
69%
+17,540
Low level
3,890
7,510
7,860
6,765
6,245
20%
+2,355
Overhead
8,450
9,715
8,495
4,625
2,600
8%
-5,850
Furrow
11,000
6,395
4,205
1,545
820
3%
-10,180
Total (ha)
27,220
35,505
37,075
32,885
31,085
100%
+3,865
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 19 of 65
4.6 Change in rootstocks 1997 to 2014 Figure 7 lists rootstocks of grapevine plantings in the Murray Valley study area and shows the proportion of plantings that are not on a rootstock (29% in 2014). Plantings not on a rootstock are either on their own roots or have been top-worked on to the roots of the previous variety. The proportion of plantings on a rootstock increased from 30% in 1997 to 71% in 2014. The dominant rootstocks are Ramsey (33%), Schwarzmann (13%) and Paulsen 1103 (10% of plantings).
Figure 7:
Change in rootstocks of grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
40,000 35,000
hectares
30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0
2
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
Not on rootstock Dog Ridge Harmony Kober 5BB K51-32 K51-40 101-14 Paulsen 1103 Ramsey Richter 99,110 Ruggeri 140 Schwarzmann SO4 Teleki 5A,5C 2 Other rootstocks
19,188 176 299 9 51 127 25 40 4,943 14 229 1,571 31 486 32
17,428 433 301 242 119 271 128 1,083 9,368 59 1,144 3,902 57 918 50
14,667 547 274 300 121 286 260 2,362 11,070 59 1,632 4,357 80 1,004 57
10,784 596 208 344 98 263 276 2,678 10,620 90 1,606 4,208 78 979 56
8,983 689 196 355 87 193 304 3,228 10,139 98 1,721 4,000 70 976 46
Total hectares
27,220
35,505
37,075
32,885
31,085
% No rootstock
70%
49%
40%
33%
29%
% on a rootstock
30%
51%
60%
67%
71%
Other rootstock Teleki 5A,5C SO4 Schwarzmann Ruggeri 140 Richter 99,110 Ramsey Paulsen 1103 101-14 K51-40 K51-32 Kober 5BB Harmony Dog Ridge Not on rootstock % of 2014 Change total 1997-2014 29% -10,205 2% +513 1% -104 1% +346 0% +37 1% +66 1% +279 10% +3,187 33% +5,195 0% +84 6% +1,493 13% +2,429 0% +39 3% +490 0% +14 100%
+3,865
Other rootstocks: 34EMFoex, 3309 Couderc, Freedom, Riparia Gloire, Rupestris du Lot, Salt Creek
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 20 of 65
4.7 Change in property numbers and size 1997 to 2014 Figure 8 provides estimates of property numbers and average property size (grapevine area) across the Murray Valley study area from 1997 to 2014. • The study area has approximately 1,277 properties growing grapevines for wine, dried and/or table grape production. Average property size (grapevine area) is 24.3 hectares. •
The average property size (grapevine area) more than doubled; from 11.1 hectares in 1997 to 24.3 hectares in 2014.
•
There were 1,168 fewer grape growing properties in 2014 than in 1997; a 48% decline in property numbers.
•
The number of properties below 20 hectares decreased by 1,245 properties, while the number of properties over 20 hectares increased by 77.
Figure 8:
Change in the number and size of grape growing properties 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
2,500 Number of properties
> 500 ha 2,000
640
100 to 500 ha
629 551
1,500 1,000
887
50 to 100 ha 20 to 50 ha
379
792
705 510
500 688
667
626
498
2006
2009
0 Property size (grapevine area)
1997
2003
282
10 to 20 ha
366
5 to 10 ha
322
1 to 5 ha
2014
% of 2014 total
Change 1997-2014
1 to 5 ha
688
667
626
498
322
25%
-366
5 to 10 ha
887
792
705
510
366
29%
-521
10 to 20 ha
640
629
551
379
282
22%
-358
20 to 40 ha
182
229
214
186
188
15%
+6
40 to 100 ha
38
59
65
62
75
6%
+37
100 to 500 ha
10
39
42
42
38
3%
+28
1
5
6
6
0%
+6
100%
-1,168
> 500 ha Total properties
2,445
2,416
2,208
1,683
1,277
Average size (ha)
11.1
14.7
16.8
19.5
24.3
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 21 of 65
4.7.1 Grape growing properties in 2014 In 2014, 24% of grape properties were over 20 ha, growing 75% of grape plantings (Figure 9).
Figure 9:
Grape growing properties in 2014 Property size (grape area) 1 to 5 ha 5 to 10 ha 10 to 20 ha 20 to 40 ha 40 to 100 ha 100 to 500 ha
2014 Properties 322 366 282 188 75 38
% of total properties 25% 29% 22% 15% 6% 3%
2014 Hectares 995 2,620 4,005 5,800 5,110 8,145
% of total hectares 3% 8% 13% 19% 16% 26%
6
0%
4,410
14%
1,277
100%
31,085
100%
> 500 ha 2014 total
31% of properties growing wine grapes also produce table and/or dried grapes (page 38). 43% of properties growing dried grapes also produce wine and/or table grapes (page 50). 25% of properties growing table grapes also produce wine and/or dried grapes (page 64).
4.7.2 Summary of wine, table & dried property numbers and size Figure 10:
Summary of wine, table and dried grape property numbers and average property size
Property numbers
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
% of 2014 Change total 1997-2014
Wine grapes
1,414
1,509
1,362
997
667
44%
-747
Table grapes
590
667
614
512
443
30%
-147
Dried grapes
1,270
928
767
497
397
26%
-873
Total properties*
2,445
2,416
2,208
1,683
1,277
100%
-1,168
Average property size (grape ha) Properties with wine grapes Properties with table grapes Properties with dried grapes Average size (grape ha)
Change 1997-2014 % ha 13.2
17.7
20.8
25.2
32.9
+ 150%
+ 19.7
13.6
17.1
18.3
19.5
23.2
+ 71%
+ 9.6
9.9
11.1
11.6
11.7
13.6
+ 38%
+ 3.7
11.1
14.7
16.8
19.5
24.3
*Note: Total property numbers across the study area are less than the sum of property numbers for each of the wine, table and dried grape growers as many growers produce across two or more of the three markets.
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 22 of 65
5. Wine grape industry analysis 5.1 Change in wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014 5.1.1 Bearing and non-bearing plantings Wine grape plantings increased by 5,020 hectares between 1997 and 2014, largely due to the planting of red wine grape varieties between 1997 and 2003. The area of wine grape plantings peaked around 2006. In 1997, 34% of wine grape plantings were non-bearing (i.e. new plantings less than 3 years old) but by 2014, non-bearing plantings reduced to only 3%.
Figure 11:
Change in wine grape plantings (hectares) from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
25,000 20,000 hectares
White non-bearing 15,000
White bearing Red non-bearing
10,000
Red bearing 5,000 0
2,530 7,877 2,110 1,213
2,958 8,287 1,472 8,973
3,265 9,612 1,135 9,788
1,505 10,204 615 9,601
230 9,342 300 8,878
% of 2014 total 1% 50% 2% 47%
13,730
21,690
23,800
21,925
18,750
100%
% Bearing
66%
80%
82%
90%
97%
% Non-bearing
34%
20%
18%
10%
3%
% White grapes
76%
52%
54%
53%
51%
% Red grapes
24%
48%
46%
47%
49%
Wine grapes White non-bearing White bearing Red non-bearing Red bearing Total wine grapes (ha)
1997
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2003
2006
2009
Grape Industry Analysis
2014
Change 1997-2014 -2,300 +1,465 -1,810 +7,665 +5,020
Page 23 of 65
5.1.2 Hectares of bearing and non-bearing white wine grapes Figure 12 shows the area (hectares) of bearing and non-bearing (less than three years old) white wine grape varieties from 1997 to 2014. Planting of white wine grape varieties has slowed considerably since 1997. Only 2% (230 ha) of white wine grape plantings were non-bearing in 2014, compared with 24% (2,530 ha) in 1997.
Figure 12:
Hectares of bearing and non-bearing white wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014
WHITE wine grapes
Variety Chardonnay Chenin Blanc Colombard Crouchen Doradillo Fiano Frontignac Gordo Muscat Canada Muscat other 3 Other white Pinot Grigio/Gris Riesling Sauvignon Blanc Semillon Sultana Traminer Verdelho Vermentino Viognier Waltham Not surveyed*
1997 (ha) 2003 (ha) 2006 (ha) 2009 (ha) 2014 (ha) NonNonNonNonNonbearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing 1,228 1,802 3,635 2,149 5,608 1,831 6,278 136 5,142 3 42 2 49 1 40 0 34 0 12 341 105 734 315 995 51 890 127 660 24 0 37 6 42 5 41 5 45 61 1 26 0 11 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 11 0 1 0 2 9 9 0 14 1,166 114 869 216 875 229 805 340 832 18 25 1 11 0 8 22 22 35 52 26 4 46 2 48 0 44 93 126 6 22 0 9 3 8 3 7 2 4 5 0 0 0 38 37 532 574 253 801 6 130 0 112 5 109 45 120 5 82 67 31 125 30 145 368 485 407 826 10 22 325 446 34 436 99 499 35 470 5 4,652 145 2,094 86 1,092 4 174 0 58 5 0 1 12 12 0 12 0 12 1 0 63 4 67 0 67 16 60 4 0 0 2 2 4 0 5 16 24 0 1 10 55 62 68 127 11 97 52 0 18 0 11 0 3 0 1 172
Total white hectares
7,877
2,530
8,287
2,958
9,612
3,265
10,204
1,505
9,342
230
% bearing/non-bearing
76%
24%
74%
26%
75%
25%
87%
13%
98%
2%
*Not surveyed: 75% (172 hectares) of non-bearing white wine grape varieties are unrecorded for 2014; hence 2014 non-bearing areas have not been extrapolated. All other figures have been extrapolated with over 80% of varieties recorded.
3
Other white wine varieties include: Arneis, Flora, Italia, other Italian varieties, Malvasia, Palomino, Prosecco, Savignin, Taminga, Tokay Friulilo and Verdejo. SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 24 of 65
5.1.3 Hectares of bearing and non-bearing red wine grapes Figure 13 shows the area (hectares) of bearing and non-bearing (less than three years old) red wine grape varieties from 1997 to 2014. Planting of red wine grape varieties has slowed considerably since 1997. Only 3% (300 ha) of red wine grape plantings were non-bearing in 2014, compared with 63% (2,110 ha) in 1997.
Figure 13:
Hectares of bearing and non-bearing red wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014
RED wine grapes
Variety Black Muscat Cab. Sauvignon Carina, Zante Chambourcin Cienna Dolcetto Durif Graciano Grenache Malbec Mataro Merlot Montepulciano Nebbiolo Negro Amaro Nero d'Avola 4 Other red Petit Verdot Pinot Noir Red Frontignac Rubired Ruby Cabernet Sagrantino Sangiovese Shiraz Tarrango Tempranillo Not surveyed*
Total red (ha) % Bearing/non-bearing
1997 (ha) 2003 (ha) 2006 (ha) 2009 (ha) 2014 (ha) NonNonNonNonNonbearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing 10 0 7 6 8 0 5 0 6 349 727 3,203 260 3,255 40 2,868 122 2,594 35 123 8 48 0 16 2 20 0 1 9 3 9 0 5 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 30 29 18 47 0 43 0 0 8 4 12 0 12 0 5 0 0 2 12 15 9 24 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 81 5 52 18 53 8 46 0 36 2 0 11 0 11 5 12 0 17 12 19 2 21 36 49 2 40 0 31 80 299 1,658 242 1,833 271 1,896 11 1,657 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 15 0 0 7 4 11 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 12 4 7 1 4 7 10 3 11 5 14 0 0 63 110 159 0 139 45 162 6 6 69 66 135 74 207 77 292 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 21 0 17 0 0 0 0 8 7 12 140 114 529 43 438 6 326 0 225 1 0 1 0 1 4 4 0 7 1 2 69 44 89 7 76 0 68 345 942 3,179 569 3,630 651 3,817 272 3,570 6 19 0 15 12 21 9 4 0 4 0 0 0 9 9 25 34 33 57 225 1,213
2,110
8,973
1,472
9,788
1,135
9,601
615
8,878
300
37%
63%
86%
14%
90%
10%
94%
6%
97%
3%
*Not surveyed: 75% (225 hectares) of non-bearing red wine grape varieties are unrecorded for 2014; hence these figures have not been extrapolated. All other figures have been extrapolated with over 80% of varieties recorded.
4
Other red varieties includes; Barbera, Cabernet Franc, Gamay, Italian varieties, Lagrein, Lambrusco Maestri, Tannat, Touriga and Zinfandal SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 25 of 65
5.1.4 White wine grape varieties Figure 14 shows the total area (bearing plus non-bearing hectares (Figure 12)) of white wine grape varieties and change from 1997 to 2014. The dominant white wine varieties Chardonnay (54%), Gordo (9%), Sauvignon Blanc (9%), Pinot Grigio (8%), Colombard (7%) and Semillon (5%) make up 92% of the 2014 planted area of white wine grapes. White wine grape plantings decreased by 835 hectares between 1997 and 2014.
Figure 14:
Area (hectares) planted to white wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014
3,031 44 446 24 63 11 1,280 25 30 23 130 99 346 4,797 5 1 1 52 -
5,784 50 1,050 43 26 2 1,084 11 48 12 38 116 155 480 2,180 12 67 4 65 18 -
7,439 40 1,046 47 11 10 1,104 30 48 11 570 154 513 535 1,096 12 67 5 129 11 -
6,414 34 1,017 47 7 23 9 1,145 58 137 9 827 126 892 534 174 12 83 21 138 3 -
5,145 12 660 45 2 23 14 850 52 132 9 808 82 836 476 58 12 64 24 97 1 172
% of 2014 total white 54% 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 1% 1% 0% 8% 1% 9% 5% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 2%
10,407
11,246
12,877
11,709
9,572
100%
% Bearing
76%
74%
75%
87%
98%
% Non-bearing
24%
26%
25%
13%
2%
WHITE wine grapes
Variety
1997
Chardonnay Chenin Blanc Colombard Crouchen Doradillo Fiano Frontignac Gordo Muscat Canada Muscat other 5 Other white Pinot Grigio / Gris Riesling Sauvignon Blanc Semillon Sultana Traminer Verdelho Vermentino Viognier Waltham
Not surveyed Total white (ha)
2003
2006
2009
2014
Change 1997-2014 +2,114 -32 +214 +21 -61 +23 +3 -429 +26 +102 -14 +808 -49 +737 +129 -4,739 +7 +62 +24 +97 -51 +172 -835
5
Other white wine varieties include: Arneis, Flora, Italia, other Italian varieties, Malvasia, Palomino, Prosecco, Savignin, Taminga, Tokay Friulilo and Verdejo. SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 26 of 65
5.1.5 Red wine grape varieties Figure 15 shows the total area (bearing and non-bearing hectares (Figure 13)) of red wine grape varieties and change from 1997 to 2014. The dominant red wine varieties Shiraz (39%), Cabernet Sauvignon (29%) and Merlot (18%) make up 86% of the 2014 planted area of red wine grapes. Red wine grape plantings increased by 5,855 hectares between 1997 and 2014.
Figure 15:
Area (hectares) planted to red wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014
10 1,077 132 12 86 2 20 379 8 0 12 21 255 1 3 1,287 19 -
13 3,463 48 9 30 12 15 71 11 57 1,900 11 11 173 136 17 571 1 113 3,749 26 9 -
8 3,295 18 5 47 12 24 61 15 52 2,104 11 13 159 209 0 444 5 97 4,280 30 34 -
5 2,990 20 5 47 12 24 8 46 12 40 1,907 7 8 9 10 17 183 284 8 8 326 4 76 4,089 4 66 -
6 2,629 1 3 43 5 19 8 36 29 31 1,664 15 8 9 16 14 162 292 8 19 225 7 68 3,576 4 57 225
% of 2014 total 0% 29% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 18% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 39% 0% 1% 2%
3,323
10,444
10,923
10,216
9,178
100%
% Bearing
37%
86%
90%
94%
97%
% Non-bearing
63%
14%
10%
6%
3%
RED wine grapes
Variety Black Muscat Cabernet Sauvignon Carina, Zante Chambourcin Cienna Dolcetto Durif Graciano Grenache Malbec Mataro Merlot Montepulciano Nebbiolo Negro Amaro Nero d'Avola 6 Other red Petit Verdot Pinot Noir Red Frontignac Rubired Ruby Cabernet Sagrantino Sangiovese Shiraz Tarrango Tempranillo Not surveyed
Total red (ha)
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
Change 1997-2014 -4 +1,553 -130 -9 +43 +5 +19 +8 -51 +27 +10 +1,285 +15 +8 +9 +16 +6 +162 +280 +8 -2 -30 +7 +65 +2,290 -16 +57 +225 +5,855
6
Other red varieties includes; Barbera, Cabernet Franc, Gamay, Italian varieties, Lagrein, Lambrusco Maestri, Tannat, Touriga and Zinfandal SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 27 of 65
5.2 Wine grape production 1997 to 2014 Estimates of wine grape yields (tonnes/hectare) in the Murray Valley study area were derived by dividing tonnages reported in annual Wine Grape Crush Surveys7 by hectares of bearing vines from SunRISE crop mapping (Figure 12 and Figure 13). The average yield in 2014 across all varieties was 23 tonnes/ha, and ranged from 18 to 23 tonnes/ha in the seasons 1997, 2003, 2006 and 2009 (Figure 16). The yield averages are slightly higher than those reported previously (19 tonnes/ha; Martin, Dunn, & Krstic (2007), or 20 tonnes/ha (range 5 to 43 tonnes/ha); Retallack (2012)). Note that the average yields in Figure 16 are derived from bearing plantings across corporate, contracted and uncontracted vineyards. The estimate assumes that: •
All bearing vines were harvested; whereas each season some crop is not harvested due to being uncontracted or damaged for example by drought, heat damage, flooding or moulds.
•
Vines less than three years old are not harvested (although there may be some small crop).
Note also that the Wine Grape Crush Survey may slightly over or under-represent intake in the earlier surveys because not all wineries submit their data, and some Murray Valley fruit is crushed by wineries outside the survey or wineries bring fruit in from outside the Murray Valley study area.
Figure 16:
Average yield (tonnes/hectare) from bearing wine grape plantings 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
yield (tonnes/hectare)
30 25
whites reds
20
total
15 10
Wine grapes
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
Change 1997-2014 % t/ha
White
22.9
20.7
24.5
20.8
25.3
+ 11%
+ 2.5
Red
23.3
15.7
18.4
17.0
19.9
- 15%
- 3.4
22.9
18.1
21.4
18.9
22.7
- 1%
- 0.2
Average tonnes/ha
7
Wine Grape Crush Survey data compiled and published on behalf of Murray Valley Winegrowers Inc. by Agriculture Victoria (1997), Department of Primary Industries (2003), Department of Primary Industries (2006), Department of Primary Industries (2009) and Hickey & Hengsen (2014). SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 28 of 65
5.3 Wine grape plantings yet to come into production Only 530 hectares (3%) of wine grape plantings were non-bearing in 2014 (less than three years old), and these were predominantly planted on large corporate holdings. The non-bearing plantings will come into production in 2015-2017. Figure 17 provides an indication of the tonnages (11,801 tonnes) that the 2014 non-bearing plantings will contribute once they reach full production. The tonnages are estimates based on 2014 average yields as per Figure 16. Production from the 2014 non-bearing plantings represents a 3% increase on the 2014 production (413,627 tonnes) from bearing plantings.
Figure 17:
Projected tonnage from wine grape plantings that were non-bearing in 2014 2014 Bearing (ha)
2014 Nonbearing (ha)
Production from 2014 Wine Grape Crush Report (tonnes)
Projected production from 2014 nonbearing plantings (tonnes)
White wine grapes
9,342
230
236,803
5,820
Red wine grapes
8,878
300
176,824
5,981
18,220
530 413,627
11,801
Total hectares Production estimate (tonnes)
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 29 of 65
5.4 Wine grape prices 1997 to 2014 Price ($/tonne) data presented in Figure 18 is sourced from Wine Grape Crush Reports 1997 to 2014. The prices are averages that include purchased grapes as well as winery grown grapes. Prices for wine grapes purchased from the Murray Valley decreased by 59% for red grape varieties and by 33% for white grape varieties between 1997 and 2014.
Figure 18:
Weighted average price ($/tonne) for wine grapes from the Murray Valley 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
$900 $800
price $/tonne
$700 white varieties $600 red varieties $500
all varieties.
$400 $300 $200 Wine grapes
Change 1997-2014 % $
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
White
$ 443
$ 591
$ 369
$ 341
$ 297
- 33 %
-$ 146
Red
$ 811
$ 586
$ 379
$ 407
$ 334
- 59 %
-$ 477
$ 493
$ 589
$ 373
$ 370
$ 313
- 37 %
-$ 180
Weighted average ($/tonne)
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 30 of 65
5.4.1 Average prices for white wine grape varieties Average prices ($/tonne) for white wine grapes grown in the Murray Valley (Figure 19) were collated from annual Wine Grape Crush Surveys. The weighted average price for white varieties has decreased by $146/tonne since 1997.
Figure 19:
Average prices ($/tonne) for white wine grape varieties 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
$1,100
Chardonnay Chenin Blanc Colombard Crouchen Gordo Other white Pinot Gris Riesling SauvignonBlanc Semillon Sultana Viognier Verdelho
$1,000
price $/tonne
$900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100
8
White varieties Chardonnay Chenin Blanc Colombard Crouchen Doradillo Fiano Frontignac Gordo Muscat 9 Other white Pinot Gris Riesling Sauvignon Blanc Semillon Sultana Traminer Verdelho Viognier Waltham Weighted average $/tonne
1997 $1,024 $431 $393 $584 $206 $88 $356
2003
2006
$867 $373 $366 $483 $258
$260
$383 $353 $1,133 $300 $687 $505 $523 $483 $309 $610 $416 $1,014 $287
$ 443
$ 591
$193 $424 $395 $528 $269 $259
$382 $337 $301 $496
2009
2014
$293 $460 $283 $444
$242 $239 $251 $414
$328 $542
$366 $694 $395 $611 $381 $456 $309 $272 $246 $274 $389
$397 $287 $279 $356 $314 $455 $481 $354 $233 $194 $209 $347 $348
$ 369
$ 341
$ 297
$350 $416 $677 $395 $502 $378 $263
% of 2014 Change crush 1997-2014 45% -$782 0% -$192 6% -$143 1% -$170 1% $397 0% $199 11% -$78 3% -$777 0% $120 14% -$232 1% $57 12% -$41 5% -$296 0% -$75 0% -$50 0% -$69 1% -$666 100%
-$ 146
8
The change is measured from 2003 if there was no intake reported for a particular variety in 1997. Other white wine varieties include: Arneis, Flora, Italia, other Italian varieties, Malvasia, Palomino, Prosecco, Savignin, Taminga, Tokay Friulilo and Verdejo 9
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 31 of 65
5.4.2 Average prices for red wine grape varieties Average prices paid for red wine grapes grown in the Murray Valley (Figure 20) were collated from annual Wine Grape Crush Reports. The weighted average price for red varieties has decreased by $477/tonne since 1997. Figure 20:
Average prices paid for red wine grape varieties ($/tonne) 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
$1,100
Cabernet Sauvignon
$1,000
Grenache Malbec
$900
Merlot
price $/tonne
$800
Other red varieties
$700
Petit Verdot $600
PinotNoir
$500
RubyCabernet
$400
Sangiovese
$300
Shiraz
$200
Tempranillo
Red varieties
1997
Cab. Sauvignon
$1,051
2003
2006
$538
$362
$328
% of 2014 crush 27%
Change 1997-2014 -$722
$576
0%
-
$453
$249
0%
-$329
$409
$360
0%
-$335
2009 $413
Cienna Grenache
$578
$447
Malbec
$695
$485
Mataro
$723
$320
$262
$238
$315
0%
-$408
$982
$596
$385
$381
$349
19%
-$633
$431
$510
$472
$321
$461
0%
+$30
$464
$321
$392
$290
2%
-$174
$509
$448
$475
$366
3%
-$315
$597
0%
-$244
Merlot Other reds
10
Petit Verdot Pinot Noir
$682
Red Frontignac Ruby Cabernet
$841 $848
Sangiovese Shiraz Tempranillo Weighted average $/tonne
$356
2014
$1,023
$ 811
$513
$270
$500
$422
2%
-$91
$494
$269
$402
$347
0%
-$147
$657
$399
$416
$323
44%
-$700
$513
$396
$460
$290
1%
-$224
$ 586
$ 379
$ 407
$ 334
100%
-$ 477
10
Other red varieties includes; Barbera, Cabernet Franc, Gamay, Italian varieties, Lagrein, Lambrusco Maestri, Tannat, Touriga and Zinfandal SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 32 of 65
5.4.3 Pricing and wine grape planting trends High prices for red wine grapes in the late 1990s coincides with a surge in planting of red wine grape varieties in the Murray Valley between 1997 and 2003. Hectares peaked in 2006 although prices were very low by 2006. Similarly, an increase in the average price for white wine grapes between 1997 and 2003 was followed by an increase in white wine grape plantings that continued to 2006. Wine grape planted areas have retracted since 2006 coinciding with stable but low average prices.
Trends in the planted hectares of Murray Valley wine grapes as prices fluctuate 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014 14,000
return ($/tonne)
12,000 10,000
$600
$591 8,000 $443 $369
$300
$341
6,000 $297
4,000 2,000
$0 $900
14,000 $811
return ($/tonne)
hectares planted (bearing and non bearing)
$900
12,000 10,000
$600
$586 8,000 $379
$407 $334
$300
6,000 4,000 2,000
$0 2006
2009
2014
White
2003
Change 19972014
Hectares
10,407
11,246
12,877
11,709
9,572
- 835 ha
Price ($/t)
$ 443
$ 591
$ 369
$ 341
$ 297
-$ 146
Red
1997
hectares planted (bearing and non bearing)
Figure 21:
Hectares
3,323
10,444
10,923
10,216
9,178
+ 5,855 ha
Price ($/t)
$ 811
$ 586
$ 379
$ 407
$ 334
-$ 477
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 33 of 65
5.5 Crop value of wine grapes 1997 to 2014 5.5.1 Regional income from wine grapes Crop values provide an indication of the (potential) contribution to regional or National income from annual production of a crop. Crop values for Murray Valley wine grapes are published in the annual Wine Grape Crush Surveys and are summarised in Figure 22.
Regional income from wine grapes increased from $103 million in 1997 to $129 million in 2014; a 26% increase.
Figure 22:
Crop value ($ million) from Murray Valley wine grape crush surveys 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
Crop value ($ million dollars)
$120 $100 $80
white varieties
$60
red varieties
$40 $20 Wine grapes
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
% of total 2014 income
Change 1997-2014
White
$79.8
$101.6
$87.1
$72.3
$70.3
54%
Red
$22.9
$82.4
$68.3
$66.3
$59.0
46%
- $9.4 + $36.17
Total ($ million)
$102.7
$184.0
$155.3
$138.6
$129.4
100%
+ $26.6
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 34 of 65
5.5.2 Farm gate value of wine grape production Figure 23 shows the change in farm gate value of wine production from 1997 to 2014. The farm gate values (return $/hectare) have been calculated using Grape Crush Survey crop values (Figure 22) and hectares of bearing wine grape plantings from SunRISE crop mapping (Figure 11). Farm gate value ($/hectare) represents the gross return to growers before deducting costs of production. Costs of production are not considered in this analysis (and are not a part of the project brief), but they vary over time and have a significant impact on net income. Costs of production from 2002 to 2011 have been reported by WGGA (2008), Retallack (2010) and Retallack (2012). Information on costs of production can also be sourced from relevant industry groups. Farm gate value of wine production has declined by 37% since 1997; from $11,300 per hectare in 1997 to $7,100 per hectare in 2014.
Figure 23:
Change in farm gate value ($/hectare) of wine grapes from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
$20,000 farm gate value $/hectare
white varieties $15,000
red varieties
Average of red and white varieties.
$10,000
$5,000 Wine grapes
1997
2003
White
$10,127
Red $/hectare
Change 1997-2014 % $/ha
2006
2009
2014
$12,257
$9,058
$7,089
$7,528
- 26%
- $2,599
$18,917
$9,180
$6,975
$6,901
$6,650
- 65%
- $12,267
$11,300
$10,658
$8,007
$6,998
$7,100
- 37%
- $4,200
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 35 of 65
5.6 Irrigation methods for wine grape plantings Figure 24 summarises irrigation methods for wine grape plantings from 1997 to 2014. The dominant irrigation method changed from furrow irrigation to drip irrigation between 1997 and 2003. 81% of wine grape plantings are drip irrigated.
Figure 24:
Change in irrigation methods for wine grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
25,000 20,000 Hectares
Drip 15,000
Low level Overhead
10,000 Furrow 5,000 0
Irrigation method
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
% of 2014 total
Change (ha) 1997-2014
Drip
2,990
9,200
12,900
15,885
15,190
81%
+12,200
Low level
1,090
2,730
2,750
1,950
1,290
7%
+200
Overhead
6,000
7,630
6,900
3,750
2,160
12%
-3,840
Furrow
3,650
2,130
1,250
340
110
1%
-3,540
13,730
21,690
23,800
21,925
18,750
100%
+5,020
Total (ha)
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 36 of 65
5.7 Rootstocks of wine grape plantings 1997 to 2014 Figure 25 lists rootstocks of wine grape plantings in the Murray Valley study area and shows the proportion of plantings that are not on a rootstock (33% in 2014). Plantings not on a rootstock are either on their own roots or have been top worked on to the roots of the previous variety. The proportion of plantings on a rootstock increased from 37% in 1997 to 67% in 2014. The dominant rootstocks are; Ramsey (30% of plantings), Schwarzmann (12% of plantings), Paulsen 1103 (8% of plantings) and Ruggeri (7% of plantings).
Figure 25:
Change in rootstocks of wine grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
25,000
Other rootstock Teleki 5A,5C SO4 Schwarzmann Ruggeri 140 Richter 99,110 Ramsey Paulsen 1103 101-14 K51-40 K51-32 Kober Harmony Dog Ridge Not on rootstock
hectares
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
8,697 86 149 8 31 114 23 25 2,955 11 220 1,073 31 293 15
9,817 209 140 185 99 252 125 676 5,696 56 1,062 2,740 56 548 29
9,005 293 125 232 102 269 252 1,533 6,986 55 1,337 2,913 79 589 31
7,333 342 82 269 81 249 264 1,727 6,731 69 1,425 2,682 78 568 25
6,247 318 66 248 64 172 266 1,477 5,698 75 1,362 2,206 70 464 18
% of 2014 total 33% 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 8% 30% 0% 7% 12% 0% 2% 0%
13,730
21,690
23,800
21,925
18,750
100%
% No rootstock
63%
45%
38%
33%
33%
% on a rootstock
37%
55%
62%
67%
67%
1997 Not on a rootstock Dog Ridge Harmony Kober 5BB K51-32 K51-40 101-14 Paulsen 1103 Ramsey Richter 99,110 Ruggeri 140 Schwarzmann SO4 Teleki 5A,5C Other rootstocks Total hectares
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2003
2006
2009
Grape Industry Analysis
2014
Change 1997-2014 -2,449 +232 -83 +240 +33 +57 +243 +1,452 +2,744 +63 +1,142 +1,133 +39 +171 +3 +5,020
Page 37 of 65
5.8 Wine grape property numbers and size 1997 to 2014 Figure 26 provides an estimate of the number of wine grape growers and their average property size. Property size is the total hectares of grapevines, including table and dried grape plantings.
Figure 26:
Change in property numbers and size of wine grape properties from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
Number of properties
1,600 1,400
> 500 ha
1,200
100 to 500 ha
1,000
429
50 to 100 ha
443 394
20 to 50 ha
800 600
453
401
400 200
5 to 10 ha 295
342
354
154 172
313
234
141
2006
2009
2014
0 Property size (grape area) 1 to 5 ha 5 to 10 ha 10 to 20 ha 20 to 40 ha 40 to 100 ha 100 to 500 ha > 500 ha
10 to 20 ha
245
442
1 to 5 ha
342 453 429 147 34 9
354 442 443 182 53 34 1
313 401 394 156 56 37 5
234 295 245 133 50 34 6
141 172 154 110 55 28 7
% of 2014 total 21% 26% 23% 16% 8% 4% 1%
Total properties
1,414
1,509
1,362
997
667
100%
Average size (ha)
13.2
17.7
20.8
25.2
32.9
1997
2003
Change 1997-2014 -201 -281 -275 -37 +21 +19 +7 -747
In 2014, there were 667 wine grape properties with a total of 21,915 hectares of grapevines. 31% (205) of the 667 wine grape properties also produced table and/or dried grapes. Production across the 21,915 hectares of grapevines comprised 1,560 hectares dried, 1,605 hectares fresh table grapes and 18,750 hectares wine grapes. 30% of wine grape properties are over 20 ha and grow 82% of the grape plantings (Figure 27). Figure 27:
Wine grape properties in 2014 Property size(grape area) 1 to 5 ha 5 to 10 ha 10 to 20 ha 20 to 40 ha 40 to 100 ha 100 to 500 ha > 500 ha 2014 total
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2014 Properties 141 172 154 110 55 28
% of total properties 21% 26% 23% 17% 8% 4%
2014 Hectares 445 1,225 2,185 3,425 3,705 5,960
% of total hectares 2% 6% 10% 16% 17% 27%
7
1%
4,970
23%
667
100%
21,915
100%
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 38 of 65
6. Dried grape industry analysis 6.1 Change in dried grape varieties 1997 to 2014 In 1997, 2009 and 2014 the proportion of non-bearing areas (less than 3 years old) was 5% to 6% (Figure 28). The relatively high proportion (19%) of non-bearing areas in 2003 was due to large plantings of Sultanas as well as new plantings of Carina currants and Sunmuscat. Further details on the 6% of non-bearing dried grape plantings in 2014 are provided in Figure 33.
Figure 28:
Summary of bearing and non-bearing dried grape plantings 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
8,000
Hectares
Currant non-bear 7,000
Currant bearing
6,000
Raisin non-bear
5,000
Raisin bearing Sultana non-bear
4,000
Sultana bearing
3,000
Sunmuscat non-b
2,000
Sunmuscat bearing Other non-bearing
1,000
Other bearing 0
Sun Sultana Raisin Currant muscat types
1997
2006
2009
2014
% of 2014 total
Change 1997-2014
336
370
350
369
10%
-88
53
107
160
22
19
1%
-34
420
255
190
174
179
5%
-241
23
10
58
22
3
0%
-21
6,623
4,254
3,907
2,504
2,270
63%
-4,353
344
795
114
82
124
3%
-220
7
140
360
425
535
15%
+528
Non-bearing
10
222
68
55
71
2%
+61
Bearing
13
9
9
2
7
0%
-6
0
1
0
4
5
0%
+5
Total (ha)
7,950
6,130
5,235
3,640
3,580
100%
-4,370
% Bearing
95%
81%
92%
95%
94%
5%
19%
8%
5%
6%
11
456
Other
Bearing
2003
Non-bearing Bearing Non-bearing Bearing Non-bearing Bearing
Non-bearing
% Non-bearing
11
Other dried varieties include; Bruce’s Sport, Flame Seedless, Grants, Hannaman Currant, Italia Muscat, Ruby Seedless SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 39 of 65
6.1.1 Hectares of bearing and non-bearing dried grape varieties Figure 29 shows the area (hectares) of bearing and non-bearing dried grape varieties from 1997 to 2014. The non-bearing areas give an indication of the popularity of different varieties in each season.
Figure 29:
Hectares of bearing and non-bearing dried grape varieties 1997 to 2014
Sultana types
Raisin
Currant
Variety
1997 (ha) 2003 (ha) 2006 (ha) 2009 (ha) 2014 (ha) NonNonNonNonNonbearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing
Black Gem
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
Carina
148
35
150
107
242
159
316
22
345
17
Zante
308
18
186
0
128
0
33
0
23
0
Gordo
250
21
168
10
132
54
139
22
151
3
Waltham
170
2
87
1
58
4
35
0
28
0
Diamond Muscat
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
6
38
MenindeeSeedless
7
6
14
5
17
1
14
1
11
4
Merbein Seedless
30
2
18
4
21
1
15
1
10
1
Selma Pete
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
7
Shirana
-
-
2
5
6
27
27
0
26
0
Sultana
6,587
336
4,221
781
3,864
86
2,449
73
2,206
48
Summer Muscat
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
9
1
Sunglo
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
25
Sunmuscat
7
10
140
222
360
68
425
55
535
71
13
0
9
1
9
0
2
4
7
5
7,520
430
4,995
1,135
4,835
400
3,455
185
3,360
220
95%
5%
81%
19%
92%
8%
95%
5%
94%
6%
Other Total hectares % bearing/non-bearing
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 40 of 65
6.1.2 Change in dried grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Figure 30 shows the total area (bearing and non-bearing hectares (Figure 29)) of dried grape varieties and change from 1997 to 2014. The overall area of Sultana plantings consigned to the dried fruit market declined by 4,669 hectares between 1997 and 2014. Gordo, Waltham, Zante and Merbein Seedless varieties have also declined. On the other hand, Sunmuscat plantings increased by 589 hectares and Carina by 179 hectares.
Figure 30:
Change in hectares of dried grape varieties from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
8,000
Hectares
7,000 6,000
Currant
5,000
Raisin
4,000
Sultana
3,000
Sunmuscat Other
2,000 1,000
Currant
Black Gem
-
-
-
-
3
% of 2014 total 0%
Carina
183
257
401
338
363
10%
+179
Zante
326
186
129
33
23
1%
-303
Raisin
0
Gordo
271
178
187
161
154
4%
-118
Waltham
172
88
61
35
28
1%
-144
-
-
-
5
44
1%
+44
Menindee Seedless
12
18
18
14
16
0%
+3
Merbein Seedless
31
21
21
16
10
0%
-21
Selma Pete
-
-
-
-
8
0%
+8
Shirana
0
7
32
27
26
1%
+25
Sultana
6,923
5,003
3,949
2,522
2,254
63%
-4,669
Summer Muscat
-
-
-
2
10
0%
+10
Sunglo
-
-
-
-
26
1%
+26
Sunmuscat
17
361
428
480
606
17%
+589
Other
13
10
9
7
12
0%
-1
3,640
3,580
100%
-4,370
Variety
1997
2003
Sultana types
Diamond Muscat
Total hectares
SunRISE Mapping & Research
7,950
2006
6,130
2009
5,235
Grape Industry Analysis
2014
Change 1997-2014 +3
Page 41 of 65
6.2 Dried grape production 1997 to 2014 The Murray Valley accounts for 98% of National dried grape production. Figure 31 shows production (dried tonnes) for the Murray Valley based on aggregated data from Horticulture Australia, made available by Dried Fruits Australia.
Figure 31:
Dried grapes from the Murray Valley (tonnes) delivered to packers 1997 to 2013 % of total in 2013
Change (t) 1997-2013
1997
2003
2006
2009
2013
23,976
13,724
23,182
12,432
11,081
62%
- 12,895
-
895
1,847
1,641
3,247
18%
+ 3,247
Raisins
1,932
1,304
1,306
1,115
1,120
6%
- 812
Currants
2,893
2,010
2,689
1,999
2,494
14%
- 399
-
31
48
23
65
0%
+ 65
28,802
17,963
29,072
17,210
18,007
100%
- 10,794
Sultanas Sunmuscat
Other Total dried tonnes
Average yields (dried tonnes per hectare) for the Murray Valley were calculated from tonnages in Figure 31 and SunRISE hectares for bearing dried grape plantings (Figure 28). Yields have, in general, increased since 1997 with the average yield in 2013 40% (1.5 tonnes/ha) higher than in 1997. The 2013 yields are approximate as they are based on 2013 tonnages and 2014 hectares. 2014 tonnages were unavailable at the time of the analysis. Figure 32:
Average yields (dried tonnes/ha) for dried grape fruit 1997 to 2013 1997
2003
2006
2009
2013
Yield (tonnes/hectare)
8.0 7.0 Sultanas Sunmuscat Raisins Currants
6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1997
2003
2006
2009
12
2013
Sultanas Sunmuscat Raisins Currants Other weighted average (dried tonnes/ha)
3.6 4.6 6.3 -
3.2 6.4 5.1 6.0 3.4
5.9 5.1 6.9 7.3 5.6
5.0 3.9 6.4 5.7 4.0
4.9 6.1 6.3 6.8 8.8
3.8
3.6
6.0
5.0
5.4
dried tonnes/acre
1.5
1.5
2.4
2.0
2.2
Change 1997 to 2013 % tonnes/ha + 35% + 1.3 - 5% - 0.3 + 36% + 1.7 + 7% + 0.4 + 161% + 5.4 + 40%
+ 1.5
12
Severe sunburn impacted on the Sunmuscat crop in 2009, hence the unprecedented low Sunmuscat yields in this season. SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 42 of 65
6.3 Dried grape plantings yet to come into production 220 hectares of dried grape plantings were non-bearing (less than three years old) in 2014 and will come into production in 2015-2017. Figure 33 provides an indication of the tonnages that those plantings will contribute to annual crops as they reach full production.
The projected tonnage from 2014 bearing plantings (18,007 dried tonnes) has been calculated using the 2013 average yields from Figure 32. And as 2013 yields are calculated using 2014 hectares, tonnages for 2013 and 2014 are the same. The projected tonnage from 2014 non-bearing plantings (1,936 tonnes) has been calculated using the highest 2013 average yield from Figure 32 (8.8 tonnes/ha) as new plantings and new varieties (e.g. Sunglo) are yielding much higher than district averages.
The projected production from 2014 non-bearing plantings (1,936 tonnes) represents an 11% increase on the estimated 2014 production from bearing plantings (18,007 tonnes).
Currant
Projected tonnage from dried grape varieties that were non-bearing in 2014
Black Gem
1
1
Production estimate from 2014 bearing plantings (dried tonnes) 8
Carina
345
17
2,333
152
Zante
23
-
153
-
Raisin
Figure 33:
Gordo
151
3
947
22
28
-
173
-
6
38
30
330
Menindee Seedless
11
4
54
39
Merbein Seedless
10
1
48
5
2
7
9
58
Shirana
26
-
126
-
Sultana
2,206
48
10,769
424
Summer Muscat
9
1
44
10
Sunglo
1
25
3
222
535
71
3,247
621
7
5
65
41
3,360
220 18,007
1,936
Variety
Waltham
Sultana types
Diamond Muscat
Selma Pete
Sunmuscat Other Total hectares
2014 Bearing (ha)
2014 Non-bearing (ha)
Production estimate (dried tonnes)
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Projected production from 2014 non-bearing plantings (dried tonnes) 12
Page 43 of 65
6.4 Dried grape prices 1997 to 2014 Weighted average prices ($ per dried tonne) paid for dried grapes purchased from the Murray Valley are shown in Figure 34. The weighted average price takes into account the proportion of fruit received as 5-crown, 4-crown and 3-crown, light or dark. Consolidated data were provided by Sunbeam Foods and Horticulture Australia with the exception of 2014 values which are estimates as advised by Dried Fruits Australia. 2014 was a poor season for Sultanas with only a small proportion of the crop classed as light colour and the majority being 4 crown brown at $1,700/tonne.
Figure 34:
Weighted average price ($/dried tonne) for dried grape fruit from 1997 to 201313, and estimated prices for 2014 1997
2003
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
weighted averag eprice ($/tonne)
$2,200 $2,000 $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 sultanas
Sunmuscat
Currants
other
Raisins
$1,000 1997
2003
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Sultana
$1,390
$1,323
$1,203
$1,252
$1,758
$1,758
$1,726
$1,609
$1,941
$1,701
$1,700
Sunmuscat
$1,390
$1,323
$1,285
$1,385
$1,850
$1,820
$1,820
$1,820
$1,880
$1,704
$1,700
Currants
$1,557
$1,869
$1,280
$1,280
$1,289
$1,754
$1,759
$1,581
$2,133
$1,776
$1,675
Raisins
$1,750
$1,700
$1,625
$1,625
$1,650
$1,825
$1,825
$1,825
$1,965
$1,900
$1,736
$1,600
$1,600
$1,600
$1,600
$1,600
$1,700
$1,767
$1,742
$1,646
$1,953
$1,725
$1,699
Other Ave. $/dried tonne
13
$1,203 $1,431
$1,412
$1,234
$1,286
$1,752
Consolidated data sourced from Horticulture Australia.
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 44 of 65
6.4.1 Trends in dried grape plantings as prices fluctuate The charts in Figure 35 track changes from 1997 to 2014 of average prices and corresponding planted area (hectares) of sultanas, sunmuscat, currants and raisins. Sunmuscat has been the preferred variety for new or redeveloped dried grape plantings. Trends in planted hectares of dried grapes as prices fluctuate
price $/ dried tonne
2014 8,000
sultanas ($/tonne)
6,000
$1,000
4,000
$500
2,000
$$2,000
1,000
sunmuscat (hectares)
sunmuscat ($/tonne)
$1,500
750
$1,000
500
$500
250
currants (hectares)
0 1,000
currants ($/tonne)
$1,500
750
$1,000
500
$500
250
$$2,000
0 1,000
$1,500
raisins (hectares)
750
raisins ($/tonne)
$1,000
500
$500
250
$-
0 1997
Sultana Sunmuscat Currant Raisin
hectares (bearing and non bearing)
2009
$1,500
$$2,000
price ($/ dried tonne)
sultanas (hectares)
2006
hecatres (bearing and non bearing)
price ($/dried tonne)
price ($/dried tonne)
$2,000
2003
hectares (bearing and non bearing)
1997
hectares (bearing and non bearing)
Figure 35:
6,967 $ 1,390 17 $ 1,390 509 $ 1,557 443 $1,750
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2003 5,050 $ 1,323 362 $ 1,323 443 $ 1,869 266 $ 1,700
2006 4,021 $ 1,203 428 $ 1,285 530 $ 1,280 248 $ 1,625
Grape Industry Analysis
2009 2,586 $ 1,758 480 $ 1,820 371 $ 1,754 196 $ 1,825
2014 2,393 $ 1,700 606 $ 1,700 387 $ 1,675 181 $ 1,736
hectares price ($/dried t) hectares price ($/dried t) hectares price ($/dried t) hectares price ($/dried t) Page 45 of 65
6.5 Crop value of dried grapes 1997 to 2014 6.5.1 Regional income from dried grapes Crop values provide an indication of the (potential) contribution to regional or National income from annual production of a crop.
Crop value of Murray Valley dried grape fruit has been calculated from: •
Bearing hectares from SunRISE mapping as per Figure 29
•
98% of National dried fruit intake as per Figure 32, and
•
Weighted average prices as per Figure 34
Crop value $ = area bearing (ha) × average yield (tonnes/ha) × average price ($/tonne) Average yields in 2013 were used to estimate 2014 crop values.
Figure 36:
Regional income ($ million) from dried grape fruit based on intake data and 2014 estimates 1997
2003
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
$45 Raisins
$40
Other
Currants
Sunmuscat
Sultanas
Regional income ($ million)
$35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 1997
2003
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
$33.3
$18.2
$27.9
$16.3
$13.3
$21.9
$14.7
$6.8
$16.1
$18.9
$18.8
-
$1.2
$2.3
$2.4
$2.1
$2.9
$3.2
$1.9
$4.8
$5.5
$5.5
Currants
$4.5
$3.8
$3.4
$2.3
$2.9
$3.5
$2.1
$1.8
$4.7
$4.4
$4.2
Raisins
$3.4
$2.2
$2.1
$1.2
$0.9
$2.0
$2.1
$0.7
$1.4
$2.1
$1.9
-
$0.1
$0.1
-
-
-
$1.4
$1.0
$0.6
$0.1
$0.1
$41.2
$25.4
$35.9
$22.2
$19.2
$30.4
$23.4
$12.2
$27.5
$31.0
$30.6
Sultanas Sunmuscat
Other Total ($ million)
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 46 of 65
6.5.2 Farm gate value of dried grape fruit from 1997 to 2014 Farm gate value ($ per hectare) of dried grape production has also been calculated (Figure 37). Farm gate value represents the gross return to growers before deducting costs of production. Costs of production are not considered in this analysis (and are not a part of the project brief), but they vary over time and have a significant impact on net income. Information on costs of production can be sourced from relevant industry groups. Between 1997 and 2014, there was a 66% increase in the average gross income ($ per hectare) for dried grape fruit.
Figure 37:
Farm gate value or gross income ($/hectare) for dried grape fruit 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
$14,000
gross income ($/ha)
$12,000 $10,000
sultanas sunmuscat
$8,000
currants raisins
$6,000 $4,000 $2,000
Sultanas
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
$5,031
$4,269
$7,150
$8,749
$8,300
Sunmuscat
Change 1997-2014 % $/ha + 65% + $3,269
-
$8,289
$6,469
$6,882
$10,313
+ 24%
+ $2,024
Raisins
$8,048
$8,677
$11,172
$11,709
$10,877
+ 35%
+ $2,829
Currants
$9,867
$11,171
$9,301
$10,033
$11,326
+ 15%
+ $1,460
-
$7,046
$6,782
$14,676
$14,924
+ 112%
+ $7,878
$5,479
$5,076
$7,422
$8,802
$9,104
+ 66%
+ $3,625
Other Weighted mean $/ha
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 47 of 65
6.6 Irrigation methods for dried grape plantings Figure 38 summarises irrigation methods for dried grape plantings from 1997 to 2014. Drip irrigation has been the dominant irrigation method since 2009, replacing furrow irrigation as the dominant method. Drip irrigation increased by 1,850 hectares between 1997 and 2014.
Figure 38:
Change in irrigation methods for dried grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
8,000
Drip
Hectares
6,000
Low level 4,000
Overhead Furrow
2,000
0 Irrigation method
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
% of 2014 total
Change (ha) 1997-2014
Drip
230
1,145
1,385
1,605
2,080
58%
+1,850
Low level
630
820
880
705
630
18%
0
Overhead
1,470
995
735
310
220
6%
-1,250
Furrow
5,620
3,170
2,235
1,020
650
18%
-4,970
Total (ha)
7,950
6,130
5,235
3,640
3,580
100%
-4,370
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 48 of 65
6.7 Rootstocks of dried grape plantings 1997 to 2014 Figure 39 lists rootstocks of dried grape plantings in the Murray Valley study area and shows the proportion of plantings that are not on a rootstock (31% in 2014). Plantings not on a rootstock are either on their own roots or have been top worked on to the roots of the previous variety. The proportion of plantings on a rootstock increased from 14% in 1997 to 69% in 2014. The dominant rootstocks are; Ramsey (39% of plantings), Paulsen 1103 (19% of plantings) and Schwarzmann (7% of plantings). Figure 39:
Change in rootstocks of dried grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
8,000
Other rootstock Teleki 5A,5C Schwarzmann Ruggeri 140 Richter 99,110 Ramsey Paulsen 1103 101-14 K51-40 K51-32 Kober 5BB Harmony Dog Ridge Not on rootstock
7,000 6,000
hectares
5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
Not on a rootstock Dog Ridge Harmony Kober 5BB K51-32 K51-40 101-14 Paulsen 1103 Ramsey Richter 99,110 Ruggeri 140 Schwarzmann SO4 Teleki 5A,5C Other rootstocks
6,864 7 34 13 6 1 11 834 2 5 125 41 5
4,005 15 32 5 11 10 1 293 1,434 2 19 253 42 7
2,907 23 30 8 13 6 3 370 1,509 2 49 265 41 8
1,519 28 31 6 12 7 2 427 1,300 2 27 238 36 6
1,092 32 28 2 16 7 7 688 1,380 1 48 245 31 2
% of 2014 total 31% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 19% 39% 0% 1% 7% 1% 0%
Total hectares
7,950
6,130
5,235
3,640
3,580
100%
%Not on rootstock
86%
65%
56%
42%
31%
% On a rootstock
14%
35%
44%
58%
69%
1997
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2003
2006
2009
Grape Industry Analysis
2014
Change 1997-2014 -5,771 +25 -6 +2 +2 +1 +6 +677 +546 -1 +43 +120 -11 -3 -4,370
Page 49 of 65
6.8 Dried grape property numbers and size 1997 to 2014 Figure 40 provides an estimate of the number of dried grape growers and their average property size. Property size is the total hectares of grapevines, including any table and wine grape plantings. Figure 40:
Property numbers and average size of dried grape properties 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
1,400 > 500 ha
Number of properties
1,200 1,000
100 to 500 ha
366
50 to 100 ha
800 600
269 349
400 200
0 Property size (grape area) 1 to 5 ha 5 to 10 ha 10 to 20 ha 20 to 40 ha 40 to 100 ha 100 to 500 ha > 500 ha
20 to 50 ha 197
504
10 to 20 ha
266
104 174
308
237
234
169
90 149 114
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
5 to 10 ha 1 to 5 ha
308 504 366 83 8 1
237 349 269 61 7 4 1
234 266 197 55 9 5 1
169 174 104 38 8 3 1
114 149 90 32 7 4 1
% of 2014 total 29% 38% 23% 8% 2% 1% 0%
No. of properties
1,270
928
767
497
397
100%
Average size (ha)
9.9
11.1
11.6
11.7
13.6
Change 1997-2014 -194 -355 -276 -51 -1 +3 +1 -873
In 2014, there were 397 dried grape properties with a total of 5,415 hectares of grapevines. 43% (169) of the 397 dried grape properties also produced table and/or wine grapes. Production across the 5,415 hectares of grapevines comprised 3,555 hectares dried, 370 hectares table grapes and 1,490 hectares wine grapes. 34% of dried grape properties are over 10 ha and grow 75% of the grape plantings (Figure 41). Figure 41:
Dried grape properties in 2014 Property size (grape area) 1 to 5 ha 5 to 10 ha 10 to 20 ha 20 to 40 ha 40 to 100 ha 100 to 500 ha > 500 ha 2014 total
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2014 Properties 114 149 90 32 7 4
% of total properties 29% 38% 23% 8% 2% 1%
2014 Hectares 345 1,030 1,270 900 525 830
% of total hectares 6% 19% 23% 17% 10% 15%
1
0%
515
10%
397
100%
5,415
100%
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 50 of 65
7. Table grape industry analysis 7.1 Change in table grape plantings 1997 to 2014 New table grape plantings between 1997 and 2014 have predominantly been red grape varieties. The proportion of red table grape plantings increased from 25% of 1997 table grape plantings to 57% of 2014 plantings. The proportion of black table grape plantings increased slightly, from 2% of 1997 plantings to 8% of 2014 plantings, while white table grapes declined from 73% of 1997 plantings to just 36% of 2014 plantings.
Figure 42:
Summary of bearing and non-bearing table grape plantings (hectares) 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
9,000
Hectares
8,000 7,000
White non-bearing
6,000
White bearing
5,000
Red non-bearing
4,000
Red bearing
3,000
Black non-bearing
2,000 Black bearing
1,000 0
16 80 408 991 486 3,558
18 73 1,099 1,728 728 4,038
292 73 755 2,569 528 3,823
206 342 709 2,744 180 3,139
102 568 1,123 3,835 445 2,682
% of 2014 total 1% 6% 13% 44% 5% 31%
5,540
7,685
8,040
7,320
8,755
100%
% Bearing
84%
76%
80%
85%
81%
% Non-bearing
16%
24%
20%
15%
19%
% Black grapes
2%
1%
5%
7%
8%
% Red grapes
25%
37%
41%
47%
57%
% White grapes
73%
62%
54%
45%
36%
Table grapes
1997
Black non-bearing Black bearing Red non-bearing Red bearing White non-bearing White bearing Total table grapes (ha)
2003
2006
2009
2014
Change 1997-2014 +86 +488 +715 +2,844 -41 -876 +3,215
Note: Grape varieties for 38% of 2014 non-bearing plantings were not recorded. Hence, 2014 non-bearing figures in Figure 42 and Figure 43 are extrapolated from 62% of recorded varieties and are indicative only. All other figures have been extrapolated with at least 80% of varieties recorded.
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 51 of 65
7.1.1 Hectares of bearing and non-bearing table grape varieties The non-bearing areas of table grapes in Figure 43 give an indication of changes in the popularity of different varieties. For instance, Red Globe was popular from 1997 to 2003 but new plantings of the variety have since declined. Figure 43:
Colour & season
Hectares of bearing and non-bearing table grape varieties 1997 to 2014
Variety 14
Black grapes
Early Other Mid PBR varieties Mid M-L
1997 (ha) 2003 (ha) 2006 (ha) 2009 (ha) 2014 (ha) NonNonNonNonNonbearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing bearing 4 2 5 1 6 0 4 0 4 1 0
0
0
3
3
32
37
63
128
5
Black Muscat
7
2
10
0
7
1
8
1
9
0
PBR varieties
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
30
65
39
1
20
0
12
0
8
0
7
0
0
0
2
10
11
233
231
116
324
30
31
11
36
5
35
24
52
5
45
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
7
21
0
69
1
40
0
18
0
10
0
4
0
147
16
146
17
140
6
93
16
142
28
7
31
71
42
111
12
103
7
160
50
38
2
28
0
19
0
9
0
5
0
PBR varieties
0
0
0
1
1
2
3
2
14
85
Red Emperor
171
10
95
2
66
0
33
0
12
0
Red Globe
509
333
1,177
335
1,376
121
1,220
52
967
75
32
16
154
654
777
482
1,258
632
2,512
865
17
1
18
48
61
132
16
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
10
20
607
286
1,031
276
1,126
122
969
90
814
85
29
8
26
12
33
0
14
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
7
2
10
27
9
32
11
32
116
65
0
9
0
1
3
6
5
11
0
0
4
6
10
Ribier AutumnRoyal
Late
Other
15
PBR variety Cardinal Early Flame
Red grapes
Ralli Seedless Other Mid
16
Crimson M-L
Other
17
PBR variety Menindee Early Other
18
White grapes
PBR varieties Other Mid
19
PBR varieties Thompson
M-L
Late
2,595
133
2,655
341
2,292
161
1,896
68
1,658
190
Waltham
58
0
38
0
30
0
10
0
5
0
Calmeria
123
44
163
31
178
16
124
8
105
0
Ohanez
118
3
79
10
73
12
58
1
33
0
20
1
0
8
40
47
98
2
0
0
0
PBR varieties
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
41
150
4,630
910
5,840
1,845
6,465
1,575
6,225
1,095
7,085
1,670
84%
16%
76%
24%
80%
20%
85%
15%
81%
19%
Other
Total (hectares) % Bearing / non-bearing
PBR varieties are proprietary varieties only recently, or still waiting to be, granted plant variety rights. 14
Other early-mid season black varieties: Fantasy Seedless, Kyoho, Maroo Seedless Other late season black varieties: Black America, Purple Cornichon 16 Other mid season red varieties: Christmas Rose, Queen, Red Malaga, Ruby Seedless 17 Other mid-late season red varieties: Nyora, Red Prince, Red Rob, Zante 18 Other early season white varieties: Centennial, Early Muscat, Merbein Seedless, Perlette, Sunmuscat 19 Other mid season white varieties: Apple, Dawn Seedless, Golden Globe, Italia, Kismiski, Moss Sultana 20 Other late season white varieties: Hunisa, Jade Seedless, Stanley Seedless 15
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 52 of 65
7.1.2 Change in table grape varieties 1997 to 2014 Figure 44 lists table grape varieties by colour and seasonality and shows change in the total area of each variety between 1997 and 2014. The dominant table grape varieties, Crimson Seedless (39%), Thompson Seedless (21%), Red Globe (12%) and Menindee Seedless (10%), make up 82% of the 2014 planted area of table grapes.
Figure 44:
Change in table grape varieties (hectares) 1997 to 2014
Colour & 21 Variety Season Early Other varieties Mid PBR varieties Black Muscat Mid PBR varieties M-L Ribier Autumn Royal Late Other varieties PBR variety Cardinal Early Flame Ralli Seedless Other varieties PBR varieties Mid Red Emperor Red Globe Crimson M-L Other varieties PBR variety Menindee Early Other varieties PBR varieties Other varieties Mid PBR varieties Thompson M-L Waltham Calmeria Ohanez Late Other varieties PBR varieties
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
6 3 10 20 13 40 40 163 112 28 1 97 1,513 808 66 1,307 38 43 11 2,997 38 195 89 48 -
6 35 8 12 243 59 2 18 146 122 19 3 67 1,496 1,259 193 1,248 34 1 148 12 2,454 30 195 85 145 -
4 99 9 14 8 348 57 9 10 109 109 9 5 33 1,271 1,889 16 1 1,059 14 8 65 5 1,965 10 132 59 2 1
5 133 9 95 7 354 46 21 4 170 210 5 99 12 1,042 3,377 8 30 899 9 12 9 16 1,848 5 105 33 0 191
5,540
7,685
8,040
7,320
8,755
% Bearing
84%
76%
80%
85%
81%
% Non-bearing
16%
24%
20%
15%
19%
White grapes
Red grapes
Black grapes
6 8 40 42 70 163 38 40 181 842 48 18 893 37 36 4 2,728 58 167 121 1 -
Total (hectares)
% of 2014 Change total 1997-2014 0% -1 2% +133 0% +1 1% +95 0% -34 4% +354 1% +5 0% +21 0% -65 2% +8 2% +171 0% -35 1% +99 0% -169 12% +200 39% +3,329 0% -10 0% +30 10% +6 0% -27 0% +12 0% -27 0% +12 21% -880 0% -53 1% -62 0% -88 0% -1 2% +191 100%
+3,215
M-L = Mid to Late season. PBR (Plant Breeders’ Rights) in this table refers to proprietary varieties only recently, or still waiting to be, granted plant variety rights 21
Details of ‘other varieties’ are listed in a footnote on page 52.
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 53 of 65
7.2 Table grape production from 1997 to 2014 Table grape production (tonnes) has been estimated based on an average yield of 20 kg per vine from 1,200 vines/ha. Only the bearing plantings (hectares) from Figure 43 have been used in the calculation. The greatest increase in production between 1997 and 2014 was in mid- to late-season red grape varieties, equating to an estimated 59,534 tonnes of additional fruit as new plantings have come into production (Figure 45). There has been a significant decrease in mid-season white varieties equating to an estimated reduction of 22,817 tonnes between 1997 and 2014.
Figure 45:
Annual production estimate (tonnes) of table grapes 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
200,000
Black Late
Annual production estimate (tonnes)
Black Mid-Late Black Mid
150,000
Black Early-Mid Red Mid-Late Red Mid
100,000
Red Early White Late 50,000
White Mid-Late White Mid White Early
Black
Red
White
0 % of 2014 total
Change (t) 1997-2014
19,806
12%
+4,560
47,075
40,134
24%
-22,817
714
236
129
0%
-1,267
5,993
7,168
4,423
4,298
3%
-1,511
5,351
6,150
6,457
4,928
7,343
4%
+1,992
17,241
31,206
35,092
30,357
23,959
14%
+6,718
Mid-Late
1,194
4,127
20,104
30,565
60,729
36%
+59,534
Early-Mid
99
130
193
981
3,160
2%
+3,061
Mid
157
236
174
183
942
1%
+785
Mid-Late
941
477
292
200
157
0%
-784
Late
734
917
1,087
6,840
9,382
6%
+8,648
111,120
140,160
155,160
149,400
170,040
100%
+58,920
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
Early
15,246
25,362
27,822
23,614
Mid
62,951
64,651
56,057
Mid-Late
1,396
911
Late
5,809
Early Mid
Total tonnes0
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 54 of 65
7.3 Table grape plantings yet to come into production Figure 46 shows the proportion of bearing and non-bearing table grape plantings in 2014 by seasonality. The main non-bearing (less than three years old) plantings comprise 885 hectares of mid to late season red grapes. The 885 hectares of mid to late season red grapes are Crimson Seedless (865 ha) and PBR varieties (20 ha) as shown in Figure 47.
Figure 46:
Seasonality of bearing and non-bearing table grape varieties in 2014 Early
EarlyMid
Mid
MidLate
Late
3,500
Hectares
3,000
White non-bearing
2,500
White bearing
2,000
Red non-bearing
1,500
Red bearing Black non-bearing
1,000
Black bearing 500 0
78 306 95 825
EarlyMid 6 132 -
1,304
% Bearing % Non-bearing
Table grapes in 2014
Early
Black non-bearing Black bearing Red non-bearing Red bearing White non-bearing White bearing Total table grapes (ha)
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Mid
MidLate
Late
Total
65 39 160 998 200 1,672
7 885 2,530 5
31 391 150 179
102 568 1,123 3,835 445 2,682
138
3,135
3,427
751
8,755
87%
96%
86%
74%
76%
13%
4%
14%
26%
24%
Grape Industry Analysis
% of 2014 total ha 1% 6% 13% 44% 5% 31%
Page 55 of 65
7.3.1 Table grape varieties yet to come into production Significant areas (1,670 hectares) of table grapes were non-bearing in 2014 and will come into production in 2015–2017. Figure 47 provides an indication of the tonnages (40,080 tonnes) that those areas will contribute to the annual crop as they reach full production. The largest area of non-bearing plantings in 2014 was Crimson Seedless which will contribute an estimated 20,760 tonnes in coming seasons; a 34% increase on 2014 production. Production from the 2014 non-bearing plantings represents a 24% increase on the estimated 2014 production from bearing plantings (170,040 tonnes).
Figure 47:
Projected tonnage from table grape varieties that were non-bearing in 2014
Colour & season
Black grapes
Early Mid Mid M-L Late
Red grapes
Early
Mid
M-L
White grapes
Early
Mid M-L
Late
Variety
22
Other varieties PBR varieties Black Muscat PBR varieties Ribier Autumn Royal Other varieties PBR variety Cardinal Flame Ralli Seedless Other varieties PBR varieties Red Emperor Red Globe Crimson Other varieties PBR variety Menindee Other varieties PBR varieties Other varieties PBR varieties Thompson Waltham Calmeria Ohanez Other varieties PBR varieties
Total hectares
2014 Bearing (ha)
2014 Nonbearing (ha)
4 128 9 30 7 324 45 21 4 142 160 5 14 12 967 2,512 8 10 814 9 2 9 6 1,658 5 105 33 41
1 5 65 30 1 28 50 85 75 865 20 85 10 10 190 150
7,085
1,670
Estimated Projected production production for from 2014 non2014 bearing areas bearing areas (tonnes) (tonnes) 87 24 3,073 120 219 0 723 1,560 157 0 7,786 720 1,091 24 505 0 101 0 3,412 672 3,830 1,200 126 0 331 2,040 297 0 23,205 1,800 60,291 20,760 196 0 241 480 19,540 2,040 222 0 45 240 210 0 140 240 39,784 4,560 129 0 2,526 0 793 0 0 0 979 3,600
Production estimate (tonnes) 22
170,040
40,080
Details of ‘other varieties’ are listed in a footnote under Figure 43 on page 52.
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 56 of 65
7.4 Table grape prices 1997 to 2014 Wholesale prices ($/kg) paid for table grapes sent into the Melbourne and Sydney wholesale markets between January and April (inclusive) from 1997 to 2014 were sourced from Ausmarket Consultants. The data provided by Ausmarket Consultants represented averages and highest and lowest prices per month by variety. SunRISE Mapping are unable to further calculate a weighted average, however the average monthly prices already take the volume of delivery at each price into consideration, by variety. The average prices returned to growers from the wholesale markets increased overall by $ 0.20 between 1997 and 2014. The greatest price increase ($0.79) was for black grapes. The price of white grapes between 1997 and 2014 fell by $0.18.
Figure 48:
Average wholesale price ($ per kilogram) for table grapes delivered into Melbourne and Sydney markets 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
wholesale market price ($/kg)
$1.70 $1.60 $1.50 $1.40 Black
$1.30 $1.20
Red
$1.10
White
$1.00 $0.90 $0.80
Table grapes
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
Change ($) 1997-2014
White
$ 1.06
$ 1.14
$ 1.02
$ 0.84
$ 0.88
- $ 0.18
Red
$ 1.06
$ 1.10
$ 1.31
$ 1.52
$ 1.39
+ $ 0.32
Black
$ 0.89
$ 1.11
$ 1.27
$ 1.40
$ 1.68
+ $ 0.79
$ 1.03
$ 1.11
$ 1.20
$ 1.32
$ 1.23
+ $ 0.20
Average price $/kg
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 57 of 65
7.4.1 Monthly wholesale prices for table grapes delivered into the Melbourne and Sydney markets
Figure 49:
Monthly average wholesale prices ($ per kilogram) for table grapes at Melbourne and Sydney markets between January and April, 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
2006
2009
2014
$4.00 $3.50 wholesale market price ($/kg)
Black
Red
White
$3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50
1997
2003
$ 1.31
$ 1.08
$ 1.09
$ 1.17
$ 1.00
February
$ 1.01
$ 0.91
$ 1.08
$ 0.90
$ 0.87
March
$ 0.93
$ 1.21
$ 0.88
$ 0.69
$ 0.79
April
$ 0.97
$ 1.25
$ 1.04
$ 0.79
$ 0.85
January
$ 1.19
$ 1.16
$ 1.36
$ 1.89
$ 1.63
February
$ 1.01
$ 1.12
$ 1.31
$ 1.44
$ 1.32
March
$ 1.03
$ 1.16
$ 1.32
$ 1.35
$ 1.31
April
$ 1.03
$ 0.99
$ 1.18
$ 1.30
$ 1.32
January
$ 1.04
$ 1.90
$ 1.74
$ 3.70
$ 1.91
February
$ 0.82
$ 1.08
$ 1.15
$ 1.43
$ 1.84
March
$ 0.89
$ 1.02
$ 1.17
$ 1.30
$ 1.59
April
$ 0.86
$ 1.06
$ 1.40
$ 1.19
$ 1.31
Average $/kg
$ 1.03
$ 1.11
$ 1.20
$ 1.32
$ 1.23
Black
Red
White
January
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 58 of 65
7.4.2 Trends in pricing and areas of table grape plantings The charts in Figure 50 show change from 1997 to 2014 in average prices for table grape plantings (dashed blue lines) and corresponding changes in planted area (hectares).
Figure 50:
Trends in planted hectares of table grapes as prices fluctuate 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014 5,000
Black $/kg 4,000 3,000
$1.00
2,000 $0.50 1,000 $0.00
0 5,000
Red $/kg
Price $/kg
$1.50
4,000 3,000
$1.00
2,000 $0.50 1,000 $0.00 White hectares planted
0 5,000
White $/kg
Price $/kg
$1.50
4,000 3,000
$1.00
2,000 $0.50 1,000 $0.00 2009
2014
Black
2006
Hectares
96
92
365
548
670
+574
Price ($/kg)
$0.89
$1.11
$1.27
$1.40
$1.68
+$0.79
Red
2003
0 Change 19972014
Hectares
1,399
2,827
3,324
3,453
4,958
+3,558
Price ($/kg)
$1.06
$1.10
$1.31
$1.52
$1.39
+$0.33
White
1997
hectares (bearing and non bearing)
Red hectares planted
hecatres (bearing and non bearing)
Price $/kg
$1.50
hectares (bearing and non bearing)
Black hectares planted
Hectares
4,044
4,766
4,351
3,319
3,127
-917
Price ($/kg)
$1.06
$1.14
$1.02
$0.84
$0.88
-$0.18
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 59 of 65
7.5 Crop value of table grapes 1997 to 2014 Crop value provides an indication of the (potential) annual contribution to regional or National income from annual production of a crop. Crop value of Murray Valley table grapes was calculated from: •
The area (hectares) of bearing table grape plantings from SunRISE mapping (Figure 43)
•
Assuming an average table grape yield of 24,000 kilograms/hectare (20 kg/vine and 1,200 vines/ha), and
•
Average prices ($/kilogram) in the Melbourne and Sydney markets. The market price applied to each variety is based on the approximate month it is harvested (assuming it is sent directly to the market) Crop value $ = area bearing (ha) × average yield (kilograms/ha) × average price ($/kilogram)
Figure 51:
Regional income ($ million) from table grapes 1997 to 2014
Contribution to regional income ($ million)
1997
White Red
2006
2009
2014
$220 $200 $180 $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $-
White Late White Mid-Late White Mid White Early Red Mid-Late Red Mid Red Early Black Late Black Mid-Late Black Mid Black Early-Mid 1997
Black
2003
2003
2006
2009
2014
% of total Change in 2014 1997-2014
Early
$20.0
$27.4
$30.4
$27.7
$19.8
10%
-$0.2
Mid
$63.6
$58.5
$60.3
$42.2
$35.0
17%
-$28.6
Mid-late
$1.3
$1.1
$0.6
$0.2
$0.1
0%
-$1.2
Late
$5.6
$7.5
$7.4
$3.5
$3.7
2%
-$2.0
Early
$6.4
$7.1
$8.8
$9.3
$12.0
6%
+$5.6
Mid
$17.4
$34.9
$46.0
$43.8
$31.7
16%
+$14.3
Mid-late
$1.2
$4.8
$26.5
$41.2
$79.6
39%
+$78.4
Early-mid
$0.1
$0.2
$0.3
$3.6
$6.0
3%
+$5.9
Mid
$0.1
$0.3
$0.2
$0.3
$1.7
1%
+$1.6
Mid-late
$0.8
$0.5
$0.3
$0.3
$0.2
0%
-$0.6
Late
$0.6
$1.0
$1.5
$8.1
$12.2
6%
+$11.6
$117.3
$143.3
$182.5
$180.3
$202.1
100%
+$84.8
Total $ million
Farm gate value ($/hectare) of table grape production has also been calculated (Figure 52). Farm gate value represents the gross return to growers before deducting costs of production. Costs of production are not considered in this analysis (and are not part of the project brief), but they vary over time and have a significant impact on net income. Information on production costs can be sourced from relevant industry groups. SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 60 of 65
7.5.1 Farm gate value of table grapes 1997 to 2014 Figure 52:
Changes in farm gate value (weighted average $/ha) of table grapes 1997 to 2014
$/ha gross income
White Early $45,000 White Mid $35,000 White MidLate White Late
$25,000 $15,000
Change 1997-2014 % $ -24% -$7,545
2003
2006
2009
2014
Early
$31,559
$25,960
$26,261
$28,193
$24,013
Mid
$24,261
$21,729
$25,817
$21,526
$20,927
-14%
-$3,334
Mid-late
$22,263
$29,108
$21,076
$16,549
$19,011
-15%
-$3,252
Late
$23,276
$30,075
$24,907
$19,029
$20,425
-12%
-$2,851
$/hectare
$25,409
$27,318
$24,468
$20,145
$21,112
-17%
-$4,246
$/ha gross income
White
1997
$45,000
Red Early
$35,000
Red Mid
$25,000
Red MidLate
$15,000 Change 1997-2014 % $ +37% +$10,490
2003
2006
2009
2014
Early-mid
$28,642
$27,813
$32,535
$45,421
$39,132
Mid
$24,174
$26,811
$31,483
$34,624
$31,705
+31%
+$7,531
Mid-late
$24,810
$27,814
$31,693
$32,372
$31,460
+27%
+$6,650
$/hectare $95,000
$25,506
$26,304
$31,359
$36,533
$33,295
+31%
+$8,224
$/hectare gross income
Red
1997
Black Early-Mid Black Mid
$75,000 $55,000
Black MidLate Black Late
$35,000 $15,000 2003
2006
2009
2014
Early-mid
$24,861
$45,620
$41,667
$88,893
$45,836
Change 1997-2014 % $ +84% +$20,975
Mid
$19,759
$26,007
$27,607
$34,389
$44,158
+123%
+$24,399
Mid-late
$21,457
$24,416
$28,129
$31,152
$38,204
+78%
+$16,747
Late
$20,735
$25,339
$33,522
$28,495
$31,333
+51%
+$10,599
$/hectare
$21,474
$26,659
$30,577
$33,624
$40,396
+88%
+$18,180
Wgtd ave. $/ha
$24,657
$26,728
$28,859
$31,625
$29,425
+19%
+$4,768
Black
1997
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 61 of 65
7.6 Irrigation methods for table grape plantings Low level sprinklers remained the dominant irrigation method for table grape plantings from 1997 to 2014. 96% of plantings are irrigated with low level sprinklers or drippers.
Figure 53:
Change in irrigation methods for table grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
9,000 8,000 7,000 Hectares
6,000
Drip
5,000
Low level
4,000 Overhead
3,000
Furrow
2,000 1,000 0 Irrigation method Drip
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
% of 2014 total
Change (ha) 1997-2014
660
1,540
2,230
2,460
4,150
47%
+3,490
Low level
2,170
3,960
4,230
4,110
4,325
49%
+2,155
Overhead
980
1,090
860
565
220
3%
-760
Furrow
1,730
1,095
720
185
60
1%
-1,670
Total (ha)
5,540
7,685
8,040
7,320
8,755
100%
+3,215
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 62 of 65
7.7 Rootstocks of table grape plantings 1997 to 2014 Figure 54 lists rootstocks of table grape plantings in the Murray Valley study area and shows the proportion of plantings that are not on a rootstock (19% in 2014). Plantings not on a rootstock are either on their own roots or have been top worked on to the roots of the previous variety.
The proportion of plantings on a rootstock increased from 35% in 1997 to 81% in 2014. The dominant rootstocks are; Ramsey (35% of plantings), Schwarzmann (18% of plantings) and Paulsen 1103 (12% of plantings).
Figure 54:
Change in rootstocks of table grape plantings from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
9,000
Other rootstock Teleki 5A,5C SO4 Schwarzmann Ruggeri 140 Richter 99,110 Ramsey Paulsen 1103 101-14 K51-40 K51-32 Kober 5BB Harmony Dog Ridge Not on rootstock
8,000 7,000
hectares
6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0
Not on a rootstock Dog Ridge Harmony Kober 5BB K51-32 K51-40 101-14 Paulsen 1103 Ramsey Richter 99,110 Ruggeri 140 Schwarzmann SO4 Teleki 5A,5C Other rootstocks
3,628 83 116 1 6 6 1 4 1,154 0 4 373 0 151 12
3,605 210 129 52 9 9 1 114 2,238 1 64 909 1 328 14
2,755 232 120 60 6 10 4 459 2,575 1 246 1,179 1 373 18
1,932 226 95 70 5 8 10 524 2,589 19 155 1,287 0 375 25
1,643 339 101 105 7 15 31 1,062 3,060 22 312 1,549 0 481 26
% of 2014 total 19% 4% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 12% 35% 0% 4% 18% 0% 5% 0%
Total hectares
5,540
7,685
8,040
7,320
8,755
100%
% No rootstock
65%
47%
34%
26%
19%
% on a rootstock
35%
53%
66%
74%
81%
1997
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2003
2006
2009
Grape Industry Analysis
2014
Change 1997-2014 -1,985 +257 -15 +104 +1 +8 +30 +1,058 +1,906 +22 +308 +1,177 0 +330 +14 +3,215
Page 63 of 65
7.8 Table grape property numbers and size 1997 to 2014 Figure 55 provides an estimate of the number of table grape growers and their average property size. Property size is the total hectares of grapevines, including dried and wine grape plantings. Figure 55:
Change in property numbers and size for table grape growers from 1997 to 2014 1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
700 Number of properties
600 500 400
100 to 500 ha
94 75
86 210
205
50 to 100 ha 69
174
146
300 200
227
205
Property size (table grape area) 1 to 5 ha
10 to 20 ha 120
204
5 to 10 ha
151 103
100 0
20 to 50 ha 94
1 to 5 ha
94
111
118
111
86
1997
2003
2006
2009
2014
94
111
118
111
86
% of 2014 total 19%
Change 1997-2014 -8
5 to 10 ha
205
227
204
151
103
23%
-102
10 to 20 ha
205
210
174
146
120
27%
-85
20 to 40 ha
75
94
86
69
94
21%
+19
40 to 100 ha
8
12
18
20
28
6%
+20
100 to 500 ha
3
13
13
14
10
2%
+9
Total properties
590
667
615
513
443
100%
-147
Average size (ha)
13.6
17.1
18.3
19.6
23.2
110 of the 443 table grape properties also produced wine and/or dried grapes in 2014. Production across the 10,275 hectares of grapevines comprised 220 hectares dried, 1,300 hectares wine grapes and 8,755 hectares table grapes. 30% of table grape properties are over 20 hectares and grow 73% of grape plantings (Figure 56).
Figure 56:
Table grape properties in 2014 Property size (grape area) 1 to 5 ha 5 to 10 ha 10 to 20 ha 20 to 40 ha 40 to 100 ha 100 to 500 ha 2014 total
SunRISE Mapping & Research
2014 Properties 86 103 120 94 28 12
% of total properties 19% 23% 27% 21% 6% 3%
2014 Hectares 240 775 1,725 2,935 1,925 2,675
% of total hectares 2% 8% 17% 29% 19% 26%
443
100%
10,275
100%
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 64 of 65
8. Bibliography Agriculture Victoria. (1997). Murray Valley Wine Grape Industry Advisory Council Winegrape Utilisation Survey 1997. Department of natural Resources and Environment, Agriculture Victoria. Department of Natural Resources and Environment. Ausmarket Consultants. (2003). Melbourne Monhtly Grape Prices collated by Fresh Port. Sydney: Ausmarket Consultants. Ausmarket Consultants. (2014). Melbourne Monthly Grape Prices 1997, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2014 highlow-average-best from informaton collected by Fresh State. Sydney: Ausmarket Consulting. Ausmarket Consultants. (2014). Sydney Monthly Grapes 1997, 2003, 2006, 2009 and 2014 high-lowaverage-best price reports compiled from Sydney Market Reporting Service. Sydney: Ausmarket Consultants. Department of Primary Industries. (2003). Australian Regional Winegrape Crush Survey - Victoria / NSW Murray Valley. Department of Prinary Industries. Department of Primary Industries. (2006). Australian Regional Wine Grape Crush Survey Murray Darling, Swan Hill. Vicitorian Government. Department of Primary Industries. (2009). Winegrape Crush Survey Murray Darling / Swan Hill. Department of Prinary Industries. Victorian Government. Hickey, T., & Hengsen, K. (2014). Wine Grape Crush Report Murray Darling/Swan Hill. Mildura: Murray Valley Wine Grape Industry Advisory Committee. Martin, S. R., Dunn, G. M., & Krstic, M. P. (2007). Regulating Yield to Improve Wine Quality and Reduce Industry Costs. Final Report to Grape and Wie Research and Development Corporation. Project DNR 03/02. Department of Primary Industries, Victoria. Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation. Retallack, M. (2010). Updating vineyard costs of production data for the Murray Valley Wine Region. Mildura: Murray Valley Wine Growers Inc. Retallack, M. (2012). Economic Benchmarking for the Murray Valley Wine Region seasons 2010/11. Mildura: Murray Valley Winegrowers Inc. Retallack, M. (2012). Murray Valley and Riverina Water Use Efficiency Study 2011/12. Murray Valley Winegrowers Inc and Riverina Winegrapes Marketing Board. Sydney Market Reporting Service. (2003). Sydney Monthly Grape Prices . Sydney: Ausmarket Consulting. Sydney Market Reporting Service. (2006). Sydney Monthly Grape Prices. Sydney: Ausmarket Consulting. Sydney Market Reporting Service. (2009). Sydney Monthly Grape Prices. Sydney: Ausmarket Consulting. WGGA. (2008). Regional Benchmarking Report prepared as part of the 'Capacity Building for Australian Wine Grape Growers' project. Adelaide: prepared for Wine Grape Growers Australia by Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services.
SunRISE Mapping & Research
Grape Industry Analysis
Page 65 of 65