Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
CONTENTS
A. Invitations 1. Invitation tracking table 2. Text of invitations or newspaper ads B. Meeting 1. Program 2. Non-technical summary 3. Participants i. list ii. feedback forms 4. Pictures 5. Outcomes of consultation i. Minutes of the meeting ii. Assessment of comments iii. Revisit sustainable development assessment iv. Summary of alterations based on comments C. Sustainable development matrix 1. Own sustainable development assessment 2. Outcome blind exercise stakeholders 3. Consolidated sustainable development matrix D. Preparation of Stakeholder Feedback Round Annex 1: Participant list Annex 2: Feedback forms
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
SECTION A.
Invitations
The local consultation was programmed to count with the participation of organizations, institutions and government representatives. Invitations were sent to NGO, government, civil society agencies and individuals known to have experience and deep knowledge in improved cookstoves. Nevertheless, an open invitation was published at a local wide-range newspaper. We also had the support of the Grupo de Apoyo al Sector Rural (Rural Sector Support Group), a division of the Engineering School of Católica University (Pontificia Universidad Católica DEL Perú – PUCP). They helped us with the setting of the event, lending us the auditorium were it was held, and broadcasting information about it (with designed posters, flyers and press notes made by Microsol) This way, we counted with the participation of 70 people that attended the meeting. The principal means of invitation were: a) sent invitations by e-mail to listed organizations and people (stakeholders); b) published advertising (newspaper, poster, flyers). The stakeholder consultation was held on August the 20th of 2009 at 9.30AM, at the Auditorium of the Engienieering School of PUCP. A.1.
Invitation tracking table
In this table we will present all participants that were invited by different means of invitation. The following chart includes all mandatory categories proposed by GS methodology. It is a long list because, as this is a national programm (not a project) many actors are involved and so, their participation was required. The means of invitations for this event were: a. E-mail invitations: As our field of action is the whole country. There were many guests to keep in mind and we couldn’t send invitations to all of them. Therefore, a mail research phase previous to the event was necessary. b. Printed invitations: We wanted the presence of certain policy maker groups, such as ministries, international government agencies, etc. This needed printed invitations as part of their protocols. c. Personal invitations: Mainly made to beneficiaries, as they didn’t count with email accounts nor telephone connection. Invitations were made by Microsol LPP’s. d. Advertisements: A newspaper add was published on August 14th. Also, we printed posters and flyers that were distributed at Catolica University. The event was also published at our website. We didn’t have the attendance of many beneficiaries of the program, only of 2 of them. This can be explained because: a) The event took place in Lima, Peru’s
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
2
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
capital, and most of current beneficiaries live in far away provinces. We had the participation of 2 of them because of coordinations we had with ADRA, NGO that is one of our LPP for 2008 POA, b) For Qori Q’oncha Program we consider organized institutional groups as our LPP, and so main actors with whom we work, and institutions. Our LPP can be NGO, Local Government, and other organized institutions. Therefore, they are our main focus to whom we direct our job. Notice that we consider in this chart general people that confirmed their attendance because of the different publications we had (under the code G – people in general). Not all of them came the day of the event, but some others, of which we didn’t have any record, did. Also, keep in mind that invitations are sent to institutions, although we place as name of the invitee the people with highest in the institution (such as Mayor, Manager, etc.). Therefore when they answered back they confirmed the participation not only of one member, but sometimes even 3 or 4. Because of the amount of people invited, we created one more code called H, which refers to exclusive research institution & press. Before the main chart, read the following one which includes all names, initials and description of all invited organizations Official name (in Spanish) Gobierno Regional de [Name of the Region] Ministerio Nacional del Ambiente Ministerio de Vivienda Programa Nacional de Apoyo Directo a los más pobres ‐ JUNTOS Ministerio de Salud Comunidad Andina de Naciones Naciones Unidas Programa de las Naciones Unidad para el Desarrollo ‐ Organización de las Naciones Unidas Organización Panamericana de la Salud
Translated Name
INITIALS
Regional Government GR of [Name of the Region] Ministry of MINAM Environment Ministry of Houshold MINVIV National program for direct support to the poorest Ministry of Health Community of Andean Nations United Nations United Nations Program for Development Pan‐american health organización
JUNTOS
MINSA CAN UN PNUD ‐ ONU
Description of the institution Peru is divided in regions, provinces and districts. This is the first macro government unit. National authority with intendance in environmental issues National authority that promotes houses to each citizen Program that belongs to the Prime Ministry Consul National authority in health issues Network that groups the governments of Peru, Bolivia, Colombia and Ecuador United Nations
UN program for development, based in Peru. OPS UN program for health
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
3
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Fondo Nacional del Ambiente Centro de promoción del desarrollo humano, ecotecnologías y culturas Red de Municipalidades Rurales del Perú Centro de Estudios y Promoción del Desarrollo DESCO ‐ Programa Regional Sur DESCO ‐ Programa Sierra Central Manejo Sostenible de Suelo y Agua en Laderas Instituto de Desarrollo y Medio Ambiente Sociedad Nacional del Ambiente Fundación Peruana para la Protección de la Naturaleza Conservación Internacional Peru
Environmental National Fund Promotion center for human development, eco‐technologies and culture. Peru's Local Governemnts' Network Studies Center for Development Promotion DESCO ‐ South Regional Program DESCO ‐ Central Highlands Program Sustainable handle of water and land in slopes Environment and Development Institute Environmental National Society
Peruvian fund for Nature Protection Conservation International Peru Pro Health Pro Ambiente Saludable Environment PRISMA Prisma Proper Techonology Instituto de Transferencia Transfer Institute for de Tecnologías Apropiadas Marginal Sectors ‐ para Sectores Marginales ‐ Andres Bello Convenio Andrés Bello Convention
Asociación Peruana de Energía Solar Centro de Ecología y Género
Peruvian Asociation for Solar Energy Gender and Ecology Center
Heifer Peru
Heifer Peru
Soluciones Prácticas ‐ ITDG Practical Solutions
FONAM
Institution that promotes the inversion in environmental projects.
DETEC
Local NGO REMURPE Association of all local governments from rural zones in Peru DESCO Local NGO DESCO DESCO program for the south DESCO DESCO program for the north
MASAL IDMA
Project managed by COSUDE and MINAG (Ministry of Agriculture)
SNA
Local NGO Society that groups diverse environmental organizations in Peru
PRONATURALEZ A
Local NGO
CI PRO AMBIENTE SALUDABLE PRISMA
ITACAB
APES CENTRO ECO HEIFER PERU
ITDG
International NGO Local NGO Local consultory enterprise and NGO
Institution that promotes the usage of adequate techonolgies in poor sectors Civil society asociation that promotes and developes the use of solar energy in the country. Local NGO International technical cooperation agency International NGO that promotes the use of renewable energies and technology diffusion
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
4
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Swiss contact
Swiss Contact
SWISS CONTACT
ILZRO RAPS Perú
ILZRO RAPS
IRP
Grupo GEA
GEA Group
Grupo GEA
Grupo VIDA
VIDA Group GRUPO VIDA Organization for the development of Latin America and the Caribbean ONWARD PERU
Organización para el desarrollo de América Latina y El Caribe Peru Ambiente Desarrollo Alternativo Sistémico Instituto para una Alternativa Agraria CARE PERU
Environment Peru Systematic Alternative Development Institute for an Agro Alternative
PA
CARE Peru
ODS
Local NGO that promotes research of new clean technologies
IAA
Organización para el Desarrollo Sostenible Asociación de Comunicadores Sociales Calandria Eficiencia energética SAC
Energy Eficiency
Calandria EFICIENCIA ENERGETICA
Programa Sembrando
Sembrando Program
SEMBRANDO
Bolivia Inti
Bolivia Inti
Embajada de Finlandia
Finland Embassy
BOLIVIA INTI EMBAJADA DE FINLANDIA SOLARIS WORLDVISION
Intercooperation
German Technical Cooperation Swis Fundation for Development and international cooperation
Intercooperation
Cruz Roja
Red Cross
CRUZ ROJA
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit
International NGO that develops workshops and training in project managment Local NGO that developes environmental works Local NGO that developes environmental works Institution that carries out research about forestry and agriculture. Local NGO dedicated to child protection and promotion
DEALSI
CARE PERU Organization for Sustainable Development Association of Social Communicators Calandris
Asociación Solaris Solaris Association World Vision International ‐ World Vision Peru International ‐ Peru
Swiss cooperation fund for techincal development. Local NGO that works in peruvian amazon Local NGO that developes environmental works Local NGO that developes environmental works
GTZ
Local NGO that promotes transparent communication processes Local consultory enterprise that works with energy improvement. National programm held by ITYF NGO about improved cookstoves in Peru Bolivian NGO that promotes clean energies Embassy Consultory and NGO with works in environment and social development International NGO that works with projects to dimish poverty German agency that finances, executes and promotes development projects
Swiss non‐profit making organisation engaged in development International voluntary organization that promotes health protection
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
5
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Agencia de Estados Unidos para el desarrollo internacional Agrupación Empresarial de Servicios Integrales
United States Agency for International Development USAID Enterprise Group for Integral services AESI
RAMP PERU
RAMP PERU
RAMP PERU
ANTAMINA
ANTAMINA
ANTAMINA
Fondo Verde Centro Bartolome de las Casas
Green Found Bartolomé de las Casas Centre
Fondo Verde BARTOLOMÉ
Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental
Environmental Law Peruvian Society
SPDA
CARITAS PERU
CARITAS PERU
CARITAS PERU
ADRA
ADRA
ADRA
PROPERU Agencia Suiza para el Desarrollo y la Cooperacion Asesor Andes Gold Standard
PROPERU
World Wildlife Foundation CEBIES SAC CyB Desarrollo Rural Sustentable Empresa Fundición Municipalidad de Cajatambo
PROPERU Swiss Development Coorperation Gold Standard World Wildlife Foundation C y B Sustainable Rural Development Fundition Enterprise Cajatambo Municipality
MUNICIPALDIAD DE CAJATAMBO
Consultora externa
Consultant
Universidad del Callao Asociación Civil Pro Desarrollo Humano Estudiante Instituto de Desarrollo Rural Organizacion para el Desarrollo Comunitario
Callao University Civil asociation for human development Student Institute for Rural Development
UC ACDH Student INDER
NGO Private enterprise in metalurgic area Government entity in Cajatambo District ‐ Lima Person that provides advise in enterprises University with careers in engieneering and sciences Local NGO that promotes social programs University student Local NGO that promotes rural sector development
ODC
NGO
COSUDE GS WWF Peru CEBIES SAC
USA agency that finances, executes and promotes development projects. Enterprise that offers services in human resources, legal assesment, etc. Project that promotes the use of sustainable technologies Mining company that works in Ancash province. Finnances social responsability projects Local NGO that promotes environmental protective projects Research institution that focuses on andean studies Civil society organization that watches works for the promotion of environmental regulation in the country Catholic church institution that promotes poverty mitigation International NGO that developes projects in Ancash. MICROSOL LPP International NGO that developes projects in Cusco. MICROSOL LPP Swiss agency for development Support group for ProPerú NGO Carbon quality verifying agency International NGO that protects biodiversity Private enterprise
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
6
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Servicio Nacional de Capacitación para la Industria de la Construcción Asociacion Solidarios para el Desarrollo Asociación Enlace Solidario ‐ Universidad del Pacífico
Capacitation National Service for Building Industry Solidarity Asociation for Development Solidarity Link Association Center for the conservation of Centro de Conservación de energy and the Energía y del Ambiente environment Agro‐Enfoque Revista Agro Enfoque Magazine Grupo de Apoyo al Sector Rural ‐ PUCP Revista CO2 Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Universidad Cayetano Heredia Mission Economique Franco Peruana Embajada de Francia Embajada Britanica Universidad Nacional Agraria de La Molina Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria UNALM ‐ Laboratorio de Energías Renovables UNI ‐ Centro de Energías Renovables
Rural sector support group
CO2 Magazine Catholic University of Peru Cayetano Heredia University French‐ Peruvian Economic Mission French Embassy British Embassy La Molina Agro National University Ingeneering National Unviersity Renewable Energies Lab. ‐ UNALM Renewable Energies Center ‐ UNI El Comercio Diario el Comercio Newspaper Reportera Journalist Municipalidad Distrital de Huamapoma Huamapoma Municipality Ministerio de Energía y Mining and energy Minas ministry Colegio de Arquitectos del Architect's school of Perú Peru Mesa de Concertación San Juan de Distrital de San Juan de Lurigancho Lurigancho Concertation
SENCICO SOLIDARIOS ENLACE SOLIDARIO
National Institute that offers technical careers related to building issues. Local voluntary program that works with risk groups Social Responsability Program from Pacifico University
CO2
Institution that promotes energetic efficiency Magazine that focuses on agricultural subjects Research group from PUCP that promotes the use of renewable energies and sustainable development Magazine that focuses on local environmental news
PUCP
University
UCH MEFP FE BE
University Economic promotion divition of the French Embassy in Peru French Embassy British Embassy
UNALM
University
UNI
RE‐UNI
University Research group for renewable energies, in Agraria University Research group for renweable energies, in Engeeniering university
EL COMERCIO HUAMAPOMA MUNICIPALITY
Newspaper Journalist Government entity in Huamapoma District ‐ Lima
MINEM UNAC FIARN
Government authority in energy sector
CAP
Official arquitects group of the country
MCD‐SJL
Group that promotes development in San Juan de Lurigancho District
CENERGIA AGRO ENFOQUE
GRUPO
RE‐UNALM
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
7
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Worktable
Instituto de investigación y capacitación municipal
Entity sponsored by Konrad Adenauer Foundation that supports and promotes institutional capacitites in municipalities. Entity dependent on the Health Minstry that supervises local units of work
INICAM
Dirección General de Salud Dirección académica de responsabilidad social del la PUCP
Health General Direction DIGESA Social Responsability Academic Direction ‐ PUCP DARS
PROPERU
PROPERU
Social Responsability Program from Catolica University Local NGO that developes projects in Cusco. MICROSOL LPP.
PROPERU
The following chart is the complete list of organizations we invited: Cat.
Organisation (if relevant)
Name of invitee
Means of invitation
Date of invitation
Conf?
A
Beneficiary
José Atilio Ganoza
Personal invitation
Y
Personal invitation
Y
A
Beneficiary
Esposa del Sr. Atilio
B
Oscar Altamirano Quispe/ President
Email
14/07/2009 N
E
14/07/2009 N
Alfonso Ampuero/ Public Relations Henry Contreras Juarez/ Lima Representative Gustavo Corvera Coronel/ Social Development Manager
Region AMAZONAS
Jose Castro Pereyra/ General Manager for Natural Resources and environment
B César Alvarez/ President Lic. Oscar Ruiz conde/ Social Development Manager Richard Rojas Castillo/ Planning Manager Srta. Amalia/ Planning Secretary Region ANCASH
Amanda Moya/ Lima Representative
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
8
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
B
B
B
B
B B
David Ambraham Salazar Morote/ President
E
Region APURIMAC
Ruben rodriguez Colonia/ Social Development Manager Eduardo Incio/ Lima Representative Srta. Salinas/ Secretaria de General Manager 15/07/2009
Region AREQUIPA
Juan Manuel Guillén Benavides/ President Luis Valdivia Rodriguez/General Secretary E‐mail
15/07/2009
Region AYACUCHO
Marcos Cabrera Pimentel/ Social Development Manager Juan Ramos/ Social Promotion Representative Manuel Alcarraz Curi/ Managment Assistant Email
Region CAJAMARCA
Region CUSCO Region HUANCAVELICA
Jesus Coronel Salirrosas/ President Omar Perrones/ Lima Representative Hugo Gonzales Sayán/ President Washington Alosilla Robles/ Social Development Manager Luis Federico Salas Guevara/President
B
Region HUANUCO Region ICA
Email
Region LA LIBERTAD
Fernando Arias Vera/ Lima Representative
N 15/07/2009
Email
N 15/07/2009
N 15/07/2009 N 15/07/2009
Email
Y 15/07/2009
Jose Humberto Murguia Zanier/ President B
N 15/07/2009
Maria del Pilar Ramirez Castañeda/ Lima Representative Email Rómulo Triveño Pinto/ President Email
Srta. Arboleda/ General Managment Secretary
Region JUNIN
N
Email
Vladimir Huaroc/ President Gina Sanabria Sanabria/ Lima Representativde B
N
15/07/2009
Jorge Espinoza Egoavil/ President B
15/07/2009 Y
Email
N 15/07/2009
B B
Region LAMBAYEQUE Region LORETO
Nery Enni Saldarriaga de Kroll/ President Tito Santillán/ Lima Rpresentative Ivan Vásquez Valera/ President
Email Email
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
N 16/07/2009 N
9
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Angel Toralva/ Lima Representative Santos Kaway Komori/ President Hector Valcarcel/ General Manager Julio Villavicencio Castro/ Lima Representative B
Region MADRE DE DIOS
B
Region MOQUEGUA
B
Region PASCO
Srta. Cristina/ General Manager Secretary Jaime Rodriguez Villanueva/ President Boris Ayma/President Assesor Araceli Alvarez Hurtado/ Lima Representative Julio Granados/Legal Asesor Felix Rivera Serrano/ President Ivan Cubas Salazar/ General Manager Ing. Leónidas/ Lima Representative Grimaldo Cristobal Apolinario/ Social Development Manager
Email
16/07/2009 N
Email
16/07/2009 N
Email
16/07/2009 N
Cesar Trelles Lara/ President Cesar Guerrero Navarro/ General Manager Clara Lama García/ Lima Representative B
B
Region PIURA
Srta. Guardado/ General Managment Representative
Email
16/07/2009 N
Region PUNO
Pablo Hernán Fuentes Guzmán/ President Hugo Quintanilla Jara/ General Managment Gladys Luna/ Lima Representative Email
16/07/2009 N
César Villanueva Arévalo/ President B
Region SAN MARTIN
B
Region TACNA
B B
Walter Cabrera/ Lima Representative Hugo Froilán Ordoñez Salazar/ President Carlos Manzanares/ Lima Representative
Email
16/07/2009 N
Email
16/07/2009 N
Region TUMBES
Betty Inga/ Lima Representative Email
16/07/2009 N
Region UCAYALI
Jorge Velasquez Portocarrero/
16/07/2009 N
Wilmer Dios Benites/ President
Email
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
10
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
President Oliver Martinez/ Lima Representative Antonio Brack/ Minister Vanessa Vereau/ Vice Minister Marisa Quiñones/ Asessor Carmen Wilson/ Asistant
Personal Invitation
MINVIV
Roberto Prieto
Email
JUNTOS
Ivan Hidalgo/ Director Jorge Feliciano/ Operations Manager Lourdes Chunga/ Managment Assistant Adolfo Medrano Carbajal / Managment of Diffusion
Personal invitation
12/08/2009 Y
Personal Invitation
04/08/2009 Y
Email
04/08/2009 Y
B
MINAM
B
B
Oscar Ugarte/ Minister Javier Hernández Campanella/ DIGESA General Director Rocío Espinoza Laín/ Executive Director ‐ Ecology and Environment Direction DIGESA B
MINSA
B
CAN
Verónica Rojas Ricardo Giesecke/ Regional Coordinator Tropical Andean Glacier Adaptation Project SGCAN ‐ BM
B
PNUD
Diego Leslie James/ Carbon Program ODM
Email
Manuel Peña/ Peru Director Luis Valencia/ Environmental Health Sandra Zeña Giraldo/ UNETE Project Freddy Garro Flores
Personal Invitation Carta
Julia Justo/ Executive Director
Email
B
OPS
D
FONAM
D
DETEC
D
REMURPE
Cesar Campos Rodriguez/ Executive Director Wilbert Rozas Beltran/ National Coordinator – Mayor of Anta (Cuzco)
D
DESCO
03/08/2009 Y
N
N
04/08/2009 Y Y 21/07/2009
Y
Email
21/07/2009 Y
Email
21/07/2009 N
Oscar Toro Quinto/ Responsible of South Regional Program Email
21/07/2009 N
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
11
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
D
MASAL
D
DESCO ‐ Programa Sierra Central
Marco Sotomayor/ National Director Hugo Carrillo Cavero/ Responsible of Centre Andean Region
D
IDMA
Sandy Yoplac/ Program Coordinator Lima ‐ Lurin Jacques Ogier/ Latin America and Caribbean Coordinator
D
Sociedad Nacional del Ambiente
D
Giovanna Orcotoma/ Project Managment Climate Change Responsible Martín Alcalde/ Executive Director
Email
21/07/2009 N
Email
21/07/2009 N
Email
21/07/2009 N
Email
21/07/2009 N
Email
21/07/2009 N
Email
21/07/2009 N
Email
21/07/2009 N
Email
21/07/2009 Y
D
Pro Naturaleza Conservación Internacional Pro Ambiente Saludable
D
PRISMA
Alfredo Ferreyros Narciso Wong Guzmán/ President Mariela Levano/ Communitary Helath Manager
ITACAB
Fernando Villafuerte Medina/ Executive Director Norma Vidal Añaños/ Project Manager
Email
22/07/2009 N
D
Asociación Peruana de Energía Solar
Manfred Horn/ General Secretary Rafael Espinoza/ General Secretary
Email
22/07/2009 N
D
CENTRO ECO ‐ Centro de Ecología y Género
D
HEIFER PERU
D
D
D D
ITDG ‐ Soluciones prácticas Swiss contact
Maria Dolores Vasquez/ Director Maribel Díaz/ Healthy Housegold Manager Email Madeleine Munoz/ Improved Cookstoves Responsible Email Oliver Marcelo Bret/ Energy, Infrastucture and Basic Services Coordinator Fernando Acosta Bedoya/ Biomass and Biofuel Project Coordinator Javier Coello/ Improved Cookstoves Project Email Kenia Leitao/ Project Specialist
Email
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
22/07/2009 22/07/2009 Y
22/07/2009 Y 22/07/2009 N
12
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
D
ILZRO RAPS Perú
D D
Grupo GEA Grupo Vida
D
Onward Peru ‐ Organización para el desarrollo de América Latina y El Caribe
D
Peru Ambiente
D
DEALSI ‐ Desarrollo Alternativo Sistémico
D
IAA‐ Instituto para una Alternativa Agraria
Marcos Alegre Ángeles/ Direction Email Marcos Alegre Chang/ Eco eficiency and Social Responsability Centre Email Arturo Alfaro Medina/ President Email Felix Gonzales Polar/ Representative Cristian Monteverde/ Program Director
22/07/2009 N
22/07/2009 22/07/2009 Y
Email
22/07/2009
Dante Lagatta Maria Elvira Luna Heredia/ Director Edgar Mosqueira Lopez Carlos Ernesto Paredes Gonzales
Email
22/07/2009
Email
22/07/2009
Haydee Romero/Director
Email
22/07/2009 N
Julio Araujo
Email
22/07/2009 Y
Leandro Sandoval Alvarado/ Executive Manager
Email
22/07/2009 N
Email
22/07/2009 N
Email
22/07/2009 Y
Ricardo Maravi/ Asesor Miguel Mejia
Personal Invitation
04/08/2009 Y
Jose Pepe Diaz/ Responsible Ulla Helimo/ Cooperation Asesor
Email
23/07/2009 N
Email
23/07/2009
Rojas Sarapura Alejandro/ Development Program Coordinator Segundo Davila/DESSAN, climate change and reconstruction program Coordinator Nella Canales/Climate Change Responsible Julio Salcedo D
D
CARE Peru Organización para el Desarrollo Sostenible ‐ ODS
D
Calandria
Lourdes Liliana Sandoval Chaupe/ Clean Air Regional Responsible
D
Eficiencia energética
Manuel Bocanegra Alayo/ Techinical Manager Pilar Nores/ Director Virgina Borra
D
SEMBRANDO
D
Bolivia Inti
D
Embajada de Finlandia
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
13
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Luis Herrera/ Cooperation Consulor Jorge Falcón Marina/ National Director D
SOLARIS
Patricia Narvaéz
Email
23/07/2009 Y
Email
23/07/2009 N
Email
23/07/2009 N
Email
23/07/2009 N
Email
23/07/2009 N
Saul Calle Caleb Meza Jose Luis Ochoa Paul Betman D
WORLDVISION
Paul Woods Jose Umberto Bernilla Peter Pfaumann/ GTZ Peru Director
D
Ana Moreno Carlos Cabezudo
GTZ
Roberto Kometter D
Intercooperation
D
Cruz Roja
Veronica Galmez/ ECOBONA Regional Program Luis Enrique Machuca Nájar/ Director Lucia Ramos
D
USAID
Lucy Lopez
Email
23/07/2009 N
D
AESI
Jose Hermosa/ Environment Responsible
Email
23/07/2009 N
Monica Vasquez Maria‐Elena Vattuone/ Health and nutrition program – Antamina Mining Fund
Email
23/07/2009 Y
Email
23/07/2009 N
Jorge Terrel Marco Zeisser/ Director Jazmin/ Secretary Andrés Moran/ Social Development Managment Carlos Villanueva/ Social Development Managment Manuel Pulgar‐Vidal/ Executive Director
Email
23/07/2009 Y
Email
23/07/2009 Y
Email
23/07/2009 N
Email
23/07/2009 N
Ricardo Ordoñez D
RAMP‐Perú
D
ANTAMINA
D
Fondo Verde
D
Centro Bartolome de las Casas
D
Caritas del Perú
D
Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental
Pablo Peña José Luis Capella/ Forests Program Director Jessica Hidalgo/ Andean Amazon Initiative Protection Director.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
14
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Pastor Walter Britton/General Manager Santos Guerrero/Operations manager Mylene Huanqui/Health Manager
D
ADRA
Johnny Saavedra/Agriculture Development Manager Piero Durand
Email
23/07/2009 Y
D
PROPERU
Javier Saldivar/Improved Cookstoves Responsible
Email
24/07/2009
D
Swiss Development Coorperation COSUDE
Sebastian Eugster
Email
05/08/2009 Y
Roberto Persivale
Email
N
Cecilia Persivale
Email
N
Justin Stebbins
Email
N
Cesar Gordillo
Email
Email
D
D
Asesor Andes Programa de Adaptacion al Cambio Climatico ‐COSUDE
E
GS Expert South America
Mauro Fadda
Email
F
WWF Peru
Ted Peña Herrera
Email
G
CEBIES SAC
G
Salustio Soto Rodriguez Liz Carranza Ortega/ Accountant
G
CyB Desarrollo Rural Sustentable
G G G
Katya Barcena Carranza Judith Tasesola Bonifaz Ernesto Mauricio Rodriguez
Empresa Fundición
Jose Atilio Coronel
G
Consultora Externa
Lourdes Terán
G G
Consultora Externa Municipalidad de
Patricia Palacios Augusto Aparicio Arrieta
Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
24/07/2009
N
24/07/2009 N
Y
04/08/2009 N 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y
15
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Cajatambo G
Carlos Dante Aparicio Arrieta
G
Universidad del Callao
G
Juan Tapia Copa/ Environment and Natural resources Faculty Víctor Landa Ponte
afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches
Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches
Enrique Perez Reyna
Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches
Student
Hector Tello Pillaca
Aviso en prensa/ afiches
G
Jorge Pacora Puga
G
Walter Montalván Saavedra
G
Victor Manuel Vergara Castillo
G
Asociación Civil Pro Desarrollo
G
G
G
G G G
INDER
G
ODC
G
SENCICO
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Asociación Solidarios
Roxana Águila Ponte
Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ afiches
Aviso en prensa/ Maria Velarde Montoya afiches Aviso en prensa/ Eusebio Ocampos Chanta afiches Aviso en prensa/ Javier Cateriano Alzamora afiches Aviso en prensa/ Jose Fernando Gutierrez Anci afiches Aviso en prensa/ Julio Sanchez Rodriguez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Carmen Kuroiwa Horiuchi afiches Aviso en prensa/ Gabriela Esparza afiches Aviso en prensa/ Urphy Vásquez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Veronica Viñas afiches Aviso en prensa/ Omar Gonzales afiches Aviso en prensa/ Michael Callahan afiches Aviso en prensa/ Mariano Granda afiches Aviso en prensa/ Daniel Ávarez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Manuel Dominguez Bahamonde afiches
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
14/08/2009 Y
14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y
16
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Aviso en prensa/ afiches Aviso en prensa/ Miguel Angel Goicochea Galvez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Rolando Lajo afiches Aviso en prensa/ José Luis Tiravanti afiches Aviso en prensa/ Fernando Vasquez afiches Aviso en prensa/ Hugo Enrique Palomino afiches Aviso en prensa/ Cesar Dávalos Tafur afiches Carolina de la Cruz Arias
G
G
G G
Asociación Enlace Solidario (UP)
G
G
H
CENERGIA
H
14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y 14/08/2009 Y
Email
24/07/2009 Y
Revista Agro Enfoque
Johnny Nahui Ortiz Santa Cruz Jorge/ Director General
Email
24/07/2009 N
H
GRUPO
Miguel Hadzich/ Coordinador
Email
24/07/2009 Y
H
Revista CO2
Patricia Benites de la Lama
Email
24/07/2009 Y
H
Julio Vargas Neumann/ Rectory Asessor
Email
24/07/2009 N
H
PUCP Universidad Cayetano Heredia
Roberto Accinelli
Email
24/07/2009 N
H
Mission Economique Franco Peruana
Email
24/07/2009 N
H
Embajada de Francia
H
Embajada Britannica
H
H
H H
Martine Lebacq/ Commerce Chamber in Peru ‐ Manager Cécile MOUTON‐BRADY de POZZO DI BORGO/ Ambassador Veronique Hernandez/ Asistant Catherine Nettleton/ Ambassador
UNALM ‐ Laboratorio Jose Luis Calle Maraví de Energías Renovables Wilfredo Herrera Liendo Horn Mutschler Manfred/ Director UNI ‐ Centro de Energías Renovables
Diario el Comercio Journalist
Gonzalo Saavedra Manuel Marticorena Juan Zegarra Rafael Hidalgo Mónica Belling Mary Enciso
Email
N
Email
24/07/2009 N
Email
24/07/2009 Y
Email
24/07/2009 N
Email Email
24/07/2009 N 24/07/2009 N
A. 2. Invitation text
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
17
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Find in the image below the invitation that was sent, the newspaper add, flyer model and poster model. a) Invitation
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
18
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
b) Newspaper add
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
19
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
20
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
c) Poster
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
21
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
d) Flyer
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
22
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
SECTION B.
Meeting
B. 1. Agenda of the meeting 9:00 9.15
9.30 9.45
10.00 10.15 10.30 10.45 11.25 12.00
Inscription of participants Event opening Welcoming speeches by PAHO (Pan American Health Organization), CAN (Andean Nations Community) MINAM (Ministry of Environment) and MINSA (Ministry of Health), Presentation of lecturers: GRUPO, MICROSOL, ADRA, PROPERÚ. Presentation: Improved Cookstoves. Clean technology for development. Miguel Hadzich ‐ GRUPO Presntation: Plan of Activities for clean technologies in carbón market. Qori Q’oncha cookstove Programm. Arthur Laurent ‐ MICROSOL Expample of work with LPP: ADRA PERÚ and cookstove difusion in Ancash. Exposición a cargo de ADRA PERÚ Expample of work with LPP: PROPERÚ and Cookstove difusion in Cuzco Javier Saldivar ‐ PROPERÚ Break Indicators for clean technologies. Presentation of Qori Q’oncha Programm indicators. MICROSOL Monitoring for Qori Q’oncha Programm. Closure of the event. Field visit to cookstove models placed
B. 2. Non-technical summary We decided to present 2 non-technical summaries: One of the VPA and one of the POA. See them in Spanish as follows.
Programa Qori Q’oncha – Difusión de cocinas mejoradas en el Perú ‐ Resumen ‐
El Programa Qori Q’oncha busca coordinar diversas iniciativas voluntarias de difusión de cocinas mejoradas en el Perú, funcionando como un VPA (Voluntary Program of Activities). Las actividades son coordinadas MICROSOL, empresa social francesa que trabaja en Perú como coordinadora de los procesos de valorización en el mercado del carbono, y Myclimate, fundación suiza de protección climática, con base en Zurich. Como contrapartes, esto es, agentes ejecutores de la difusión de cocinas mejoradas, se considera diversos actores locales (LPP – Local Project Participant), como lo son:
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
23
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
-
Ramas peruanas de ONG internacionales Instituciones internacionales ONG Nacionales Autoridades regionales y locales (gobiernos regionales, municipios provinciales, municipios locales) Compañías nacionales e internacionales Habitantes peruanos organizados en comunidades o asociaciones.
El marco geográfico del programa corresponde a todo el Perú. Por ejemplo, durante el 2008 se realizó la difusión de actividades en Cuzco y Ancash. Cada iniciativa de difusión de cocinas se incluye en un VPA (Voluntary Programm of Activities). Un VPA puede incluir uno o más proyectos de difusión de cocinas mejoradas en regiones definidas del Perú. Cada VPA se divide en clusters (población objetivo). Para que un VPA sea incluible en un POA, debe seguir varios criterios que deberán ser revisados a nivel de cada cluster, completando un formato denominado “VPA cluster elegibility form”. Dentro de los criterios más importantes se destaca: - Cada nueva cocina emite menos GEI (Gases de Efecto Invernadero) que la reemplazada. - La cocina tiene una chimenea para liberar el humo fuera de la vivienda. - La construcción de la cocina favorece el uso de materiales locales (menos barro y adobe). - La población destinataria es de nacionalidad peruana y pertenece a los sectores más pobres de la población.
Programa Qori Q’oncha – Difusión de cocinas mejoradas en el Perú ‐ Resumen del VPA 2008‐ Este proyecto es parte del programa de actividades del POA del Programa Qori Q’oncha. Las actividades del proyecto están diseñadas para mejoras en el largo plazo de condiciones de vida de habitantes locales. Esto se permite por el uso de cocinas mejoradas en sus viviendas Las actividades del proyecto son la diseminación y transferencia de 3’624 cocinas mejoradas en dos regiones del Perú: Ancash y Cuzco. Estas actividades se realizarán entre el 2008 y 2014 (la transferencia de tecnología fue realizada durante el 2008). Los principales actores que implementan las actividades del proyecto son: - Fondo Minero Antamina, fondo financiero de la compañía minera Antamina y dedicado a la inversión en proyectos sociales en la región de Ancash. Est fondo financia parte de las actividades el proyecto. - ADRA PERÚ, LPP1 de este VPA, rama peruana de la ONG internacional ADRA. ADRA PERÚ implementa las actividades del proyecto en la región de Ancash. - PRO PERÚ, LPP2 de este VPA, rama peruana de la ONG internacional My ProWorld. PRO PERÚ implementa las actividades del proyecto en la región de Cuzco. - MICROSOL, empresa social francesa dedicada a apoyar actores locales en la implementación de acciones voluntarias sobre la difusión de cocinas mejoradas. MICROSOL coordina los proyectos.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
24
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Para este VPA se definieron dos clusters que, no obstante ubicarse en regiones distintas, cumplían criterios homogéneos para su agrupación del VPA. La razón de esta división es que cada cluster considera a) una región específica, b) modelos específicos de cocinas mejoradas). Cuadro resumen Cluster Location (region) Leading LPP N° of improved cookstoves
1 Ancash ADRA PERÚ 2404
2 Cusco PROPERÚ 1200
B. 3. Participants i. List of participants The participant list will be attached in annex 1 (once scanned) Participant List of Stakeholder consultation Date and time: August 20th. 9.00AM Location: Engieenigering Auditorium of Catolica University Nombre
Organización
E‐mail
Acosta, Fernando
ITDG
[email protected]
Aparicio Arrieta, Augusto
Municipalidad Distrital de Huamapoma
[email protected]
Aparicio Arrieta, Carlos Dante
Municipalidad Distrital de Huamapoma
[email protected]
Arana Ysa, Vladimir
MINAM
[email protected]
Atilio Coronel, Jose
INDEPENDIENTE
Ávarez, Daniel
N.A.
Cardich, Catherine
MINAM
Carranza Ortega, Liz
N.A.
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Carranza, Liz
N.A.
‐
Castillo Coila, Guisselle
MICROSOL
Cuba, Ricardo
DARS
Gcastillo@microsol‐int.com
[email protected]
Dávalos P., Alfredo
SENCICO
Dávalos Tafur, Cesar
MINEM‐ Electrificación Rural
‐
David, Susana
DIGESA
[email protected]
Davila Arenas, Aurelio
MESA DE CONCERTACION DISTRITAL DE SJL
Dávila, Celso
ITDG
De la Cruz Arias, Carolina
ASOCIACION SOLIDARIOS
Diez Canseco, Daniella
FONAM
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
25
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Dominguez Bahamonde, Manuel
ASCOCIACION SOLIDARIOS
Durand, Piero
ADRA PERU
[email protected] [email protected]
Enciso, Mary
N.A.
‐
Esparza, Gabriela
SENCICO
Esperzún La Torre, Ronald
COLEGIO ARQUITECTOS CAP
[email protected] [email protected]
Espinoza Chavez, Saonoria
N.A.
‐
Espinoza, Rocio
DIGESA
Fadda, Mauro
GOLD STANDARD
Falcón Marina, Jorge
ASOCIACIÓN SOLIDARIOS
Feliciano, Jorge
JUNTOS
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Galingo Huayta, John
GOBIERNO LOCAL
‐
Garbonel Quiñones, Jorge
COLEGIO ARQUITECTOS CAP
García Howell, David
FONAM
García Rossell, Manuel
FONAM
Garro Flores, Freddy Alejandro
FONAM
dgarcí
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Giesecke, Ricardo
Comunidad Andina de Naciones‐CAN
[email protected]
Goicochea Galvez, Miguel Angel N.A.
‐
Gonzales, Omar
GRUPO
[email protected]
Grados Tello, Adriana
MICROSOL
agrados@microsol‐int.com
Guerra Zevallos, Cesar
INICAM
Guevara, Magaly
DIGESA
[email protected] [email protected]
Hadzich, Miguel
GRUPO
Incio Muñoz, Martín E.
GOBIERNO REGIONAL APURIMAC
Justo, Julia
FONAM
Landa Ponte, Víctor
ASOCIACION PRODESARROLLO
Laura Chaquspuma, Prudencio
MINSA DIGESA
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Laurent, Arthur
MICROSOL
alaurent@microsol‐int.com
Lévano, Mariella
PRISMA
Malque Perez, Elena
ADRA PERU
[email protected] [email protected]
Maraví, Ricardo
SEMBRANDO
Mecklenburg, Francisco
ADRA PERU
Muñoz , Madeleine
HEIFER PERU
Noriega, Dante
INDEPENDIENTE
Noriega, Giovanni
INDEPENDIENTE
Ocampos Chanta, Eusebio
INDER ‐ CANCHAQUE ‐ PIURA
Palacios, Patricia
INDEPENDIENTE
[email protected] madeleine.muñ
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
26
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Percivale, Roberto
N.A.
‐
Quinto Ushiñahua, Victor
N.A.
[email protected]
Quiñones, Marisa
MINAM
[email protected]
Ramos, Hector
SEMBRANDO
Reyes, Laura
MINAM
[email protected] [email protected]
Rodriguez, Mauricio
N.A.
‐
Rolando Lajo, Luis Evanista
N.A.
Romani, Julio
MNEM
[email protected]
Saldivar, Javier
PROPERU
[email protected]
Sanchez Rodriguez, Sergio
ODC
Tapia Copa, Juan
UNAC FIARN
Tasesola, Judith
N.A.
Teran, Lourdes
IN.A.
Terrel, Jorge
FONDO VERDE
Tiravanti, Jose Luis
MESA DISTRITAL SALAS
Vásquez, Urphy
GRUPO
Vergara Castillo, Victor Manuel
VERGARA CASTILLO METAL SRL
Vila Benites, Gisselle
MICROSOL
Vivanco Mackie, Gustavo
MINAM
Zeña, Sandra
OPS
Zevallos, Hector
ADRA PERU
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Gvila@microsol‐int.com
[email protected] [email protected]‐oms.org
[email protected]
ii. Evaluation forms Evaluations forms are received via e-mail because they were not finished by the end of the event. As it lasted around 5 hours, all attendants were hurrying to leave. Then we send emails to all of them, attaching the evaluation form template, asking to fill it up. Only 4 people have answered.
All comments are translated below the original summit. Understand that we literally translate all that was commented. The mistakes are of origin. Name What is your impression of the meeting?
Carlos Aparicio Se presentaron muchas personas con grandes conocimientos teóricos y como siempre no se pudo hacer el análisis de involucrados ya que estos no se encontraban presentes, los representates de las ONGs si aportaron mucho ya que conocen sus respectivas zonas de influencias pero habían personas que retrasaron el taller con propuestas fuera de contextos ya que
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
27
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
no conocen la realidad que viven nuestros campesinos.
What do you like about the project?
What do you not like about the project? Signature Name What is your impression of the meeting?
Many people attended the meeting with great theorethical knowledge and as usual there was no opportunity to make the analysis with the involved ones since they were not present, the NGO representatives contributed a lot since they know each respective influence area, but there was people that delayed the workshop with out of context proposals because they don’t know the real conditions our peasants live. La sensación de que las cosas se quieren hacer lo más práctica posible sin complicarse la vida como se suele hacer en los proyectos SNIP los cuales aún cuando han sido flexibilizados varias veces, por la misma entidad, con el fin de que el objetivo se haga realidad lo más pronto posible hay evaluadores que no entienden el porqué de las mencionadas flexibilizaciones y ponen trabas innecesarias causando demoras en el gasto del dinero. The feeling that things want to be done in the most practical posible way, without complications as in SNIP projects [SNIP is the government program to apply any new Project idea], even thought they have been changed to be more flexible so the objective can be accomplished sooner, althought there are some evaluators that don’t understand the meaning of this and delay the job, making more expenses. (nothing written down)
Carlos Aparicio Arrieta DNI15594094 Carlos Landa Ponte Mas q nada su carácter participativo, en algo tan importante como es el mejoramiento de la calidad de vida y medio ambiente .Algo q pienso es una de las formas para crear conciencia y cultura ante el peligro inminente sobre la humanidad de los cambios climáticos ,el desmejoramiento de la capa de ozono y la contaminación en general. Its participative character, something very important in life quality improvement and environment. Something I think is one of the ways in which we raise conscience and culture in front of the inminent danger humanity faces climate change, the slimming of the ozone layer and contamination in general.
What do you like about the project?
El enfoque q dieron personas conocedoras del tema y sus aportes en las experiencias q tienen en sus comunidades.Otro asunto q me agrado fue la convocatoria q tuvo x la asistencia de los participantes q llegaron desde diferentes partes del pais.En terminos generales fue una experiencia muy agradable y de enriquecimiento de experiencias muy positivas. The foucs provided by experts and their contributions based on the experience they have in their communities. Other issue I liked was the call
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
28
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
What do you not like about the project?
Signature
Name What is your impression of the meeting?
What do you like about the project?
What do you not like about the project?
made because the invitees came from different parts of the country. In general, it was a very nice experience, which allowed the knowledge of positive experiences. Creo q no se aprovecho ,la presencia de personas de todos los rincones del pais el sentido ,se debio tratar de dar mas comunicación entre ellos,via grupos q emitan un concepto previamente elaborado entre ellos,lo cual permitiria mas socializacion entre ellos,conocernos mas y creo q eso permitiria ser mas fructifera este tipo de reuniones.Tratar de encaminarnos en este tipo de proyectos,q entidades nos pueden ayudar ,o buscar el financiamiento respectivo,en conclusión una orientación al respecto. I think the assitance of people form different parts of the country was not exploited, more communication could have been developed among them, from groups that have already constructed concepts, which could have allowed more socialization, know each other. Try to approach each other in this kind of projects, what institutions can support us, finding proper financial support, in general orientation about the subject. DNI 06120615 Firma VICTOR LANDA PONTE PRESIDENTE ASOCIACION CIVIL PRO DESARROLLO CONSTRUYENDO PERU Mariella Lévano El tema propuesto es de interés institucional y personal, las presentaciones fueron motivadoras junto con las experiencias de las agencias sin embargo los tiempos y metodología empleados para la discusión pudieron ser mejorados. Sería interesante retomar la discusión a partir de la propuesta de indicadores mostrados en la reunión así como conocer si existen experiencias similares al propuesto en otros países. The subject is of institutional and personal interest, the presentations were motivational, linked with the agencies experience, but the timing and methodology could have been better. It would be interesting to re-take the discussion based upon the index proposal that was shown in the meeting as well as know if there are similar experiences in other countries. La posibilidad de obtener una acreditación internacional y de financiar la sostenibilidad de los proyectos de cocinas mejoradas. Conocer las condiciones que se requieren para que las instituciones participen de un proyecto de esta naturaleza y la posibilidad de discutir la propuesta de indicadores. The possibility to gain international accreditation and financing improved cookstoves project sustainability. Know different required conditions for institutions to participate in a project of this nature and the possibility to discuss the index proposal. El manejo de los tiempos, especialmente el empleado en el análisis de indicadores, que resultó insuficiente. Ingresar a una discusión con un público diverso, sin documentación previa de referencia (propuesta de indicadores) y con una metodología que no ayudó a ajustar todos los indicadores planteados. The timing handle, specially the periods dedicated to indicators analysis,
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
29
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Signature
which turned to be insufficient. Getting inside a discussion with diverse public, without previous reference documentation (index proposal) and with a methodology that did not help to adjust all presented indicators. DNI 07533235 Firma: Mariela Lévano
Name What is your impression of the meeting?
What do you like about the project?
What do you not like about the project?
Signature
Victor Quinto Ushiñahua En el evento me dio la impresión de que se estaba haciendo una norma técnica, es decir que cocina sería la mejor que pueda construirse, en ese caso, etc. Pienso que en el evento no estaban presente gente que tal vez no estaba de acuerdo en dichas condiciones de construcción. Es decir no es un modelo estándar la dicha construcción, lo que sí me parece que si hay métodos distintos para su diseño y construcción. I was under the impression that a technical norm was being made, which is what improved cookstove is the best to be built. I think that there was not present people that might have not being in agreement with these terms. I mean, there is no standard cookstove model, but different methods for its building up and design. Que no se llego a una idea concreta, sobre las cocinas en sí, la mayoría de instituciones presento la experiencias de las comunidades en que se desarrollaron dichos eventos, (la construcción de la cocina) pero si bien todas logran su propósito bien. That no concrete idea was reachedm about cookstoves, most institutions presented community experiences in which this events took place (the cookstove construction), but in the end all accomplish their objective. Que quizás no estuvo bien encaminado en el sentido como lo mencione antes, el propósito del evento no fue el de hacer o ceñirse en un modelo de cocina estándar porque eso me dio la impresión. That it might have not be very well conducted, as mentioned before. The purpose of this event was not to build or adjust to an standard cookstove model, because I was under that impression. DNI: 10614668 Firma: Víctor A. Quinto Ushiñahua
B. 4. Pictures
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
30
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Image 1. Arthur Laurent, in representation of Microsol, exposes POA.
Image 2. Audience listens to expositions.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
31
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Image 3. People at coffee break.
Image 4. Mauro Fadda, GS Representative, with some beneficiaries.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
32
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Image 5. Guests have quick luch. Food was made in improved cookstoves within Catolica University.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
33
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
B. 5. Outcome of consultation i. Minutes of the meeting In this section we write the questions that were raised once we presented the indicators and monitoring matrixes. Q1: Refering to air quality, are you placing pollution indicators or only air quality indicators? Does this refere to toxic gases or particular material? Are there other indicators about chemical substances? Answer: About air quality, we understand it as including also patricular material and chemical substances but the machines to mesure are very expensive and, as assessing it it not the main purpose of the monitoring program, we have limited the monitoring to assess the presence or not of a chimeney, that is to say the capacity to evacuate gases relate to combustion. Q2: Do you monitor the eventual parallel use of the older stove? If the older stove remains, health impact could not be lower ? How to guarantee that the older model of cookstove is not being used and that the new one is successfull? How will you know that people are not using both cookstoves? And what about people’s rights? Because it wouldn’t be appropriate to just go inside their houses and replace their older models of cookstove. Answer: Through the project, populations are informed of the negative impact of using the older stove. We do follow up the presence of the other cookstove through monitoring nevertheless we do not make it mandatory and leave it to the LPPs criteria. From our experience and the LPP’s, we can say a great majority of cookstove are removed. If the older stove is still used, eventual loss in health impact should actually appear whith monitoring the health impact. As far as GHG reduction is concerned, quantitative monitoring is made on the general wood consumption in the house so, loss in wood consumption is also included in the monitoring. Q3: Usually, people in the highlands want to keep the smoke of the cookstoves within their household because it warms them up and it is part of their culture. How do we go against it? Answer: In the workshops, the benefits of having an improved cookstove are demonstrated, specially because of health problems: having the smoke out of the house improve health and reduces risks of respiratory problems. Again, we do not impose the installation of a cookstove, we try to talk together and see how our efforts can be complemented. On the other side, the need for heating has to be assessed and it is included in the monitoring, if populations would use any other device for heating, such use would be assessed and its corresponding effect on wood consumption and health would appear. Q4: About respiratory problems, it has been proved that smoke within the household
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
34
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
generates eyes irritability. Actually, people in the highlands know that smoke gathers closed to the ceiling of their houses, and women tend to cook sitting down, so they don’t get contact with smoke. Irritability of eyes could be considered as a parameter for monitoring health impact. Answer: Ok, such a parameter seems usefull and applicable, we shall try to apply it in the future. Q5: As a parameter for health impact you suggest asking if respiratory deseases occurred during the three month to date of monitoring. Such a large time slot is not appropriate, you should prefer a few weeks period as larger periods are difficult to remember. For example a question like: “have you had any cough or cold during last two weeks”? coul be used. Actually helath ministry uses data regarding respiratory diseases yo might use. Q6: We don’t see any specific indicator for health when the main purpose of cookstove diffusion is to tackle health problems. Would it be possible to make a specific indicator that for? Q7: Should there not be specific health impacts in the context of coosktove diffusion project in Lima ? Q8: As women are the one who are in charge of cooking and biomass collectinf, a positive impact on gender issues could not be monitored with related questions and be included as an indicator ? In general could’nt you monitor behavior changes, let’s say more qualitative impacts? Q9: As far as deforestation is concerned, impact should be difficult to assess as other factors could influence the wood offer.WWhat is the conception of logging that you have? General logging? Parcial logging? Biomass renewability? Also, what is the indicator used for forest land? Which studies are you refering to, for this indicator? Answer: Anual medium growth and family log consumption is the indicator we handle for logging. We refer to the studies of AgroRural, from the Ministry of Agriculture. Q10: There is a positive impact as promoters of clean energy services. Why do you place it as neutral? Answer: If this is the case, we can place it as positive. Q11: As improved coosktoves imply using less biomass, deforestation reduces, then soil is maintained and erosion is reduced so you could consider soil condition being positively impacted by the project. Q12: The simple fact of saving forests should be easily related to preserving the biodiversity living in it if you find relevant documentation showing this. Q13: The reduction in ash availability could not have a negative impact in agricultural
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
35
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
production when ash would be use as an organic fertilizer? Q14: You have considered impact on quality of employment as neutral, nevertheless project activities implies job creation, you should be able to easily demonstrate how such jobs implies beter quality as wages are higher than those in current situation. Q15: Couldn’t we consider that woods savings induces water preservation thanks to reduced deforestation, As far as I know, forest coverings induce water preservation...
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
36
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
ii. Assessment of comments [See Toolkit 2.6] Stakeholder Comment Q1: Refering to air quality, are you placing pollution indicators or only air quality indicators? Does this refere to toxic gases or particular material? Are there other indicators about chemical substances?
Assessment Eventual air quality medition should include patriculated material and chemical substances.
Q2: Do you monitor the eventual parallel use of the older stove? If the older stove remains, health impact could not be lower ? How to guarantee that the older model of cookstove is not being used and that the new one is successfull? How will you know that people are not using both cookstoves? And what about people’s rights? Because it wouldn’t be appropriate to just go inside their houses and replace their older models of cookstove.
The parallel use of the older coosktove is a risk as far as helth impact is concerned, but compulsory destruction would not be socially acceptable. Threw the project, populations are informed of the negative impact of using the older stove, keeping it is their decisions. As far as GHG reduction is concerned, quantitative monitoring is made on the general wood consumption in the house so, loss in wood consumption is also included in the monitoring.
Q3: Usually, people in the highlands want to keep the smoke of the cookstoves within their household because it warms them up and it is part of their culture. How do we go against it?
Heating is a necessity in some parts of the proposed project activity because of high altitude and corresponding cold climate so that resistance due to heting needs is plausible.
Q4: About respiratory problems, it has been proved that smoke within the household generates eyes irritability. Actually, people in the highlands know that smoke gathers closed to the ceiling of their houses, and women tend to cook sitting down, so they don’t get contact
In the field, people often mention old stove disadvantage of eyes irritating.
Response to comment Whenever financiary possible, monitoring should include the medition of all mentioned air quality determinants. Nevertheless, the minimum assessment is the evacuation of smoke threw the presence of a chimeney as it is very cost effective as parameter. The parapell use of the older stove shall be considered having a counterproductive impact on air quality and health.
Heating use is assessed in the monitoring and whenever detected, corresponding influence on health impact will be taken into account while influence on GHG emission is, by definition, already taken into account. Whenever possible, such a parameter could be used for monitoring health impact.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
37
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
with smoke. Irritability of eyes could be considered as a parameter for monitoring health impact. Q5: As a parameter for health impact you suggest asking if respiratory deseases occurred during the three month to date of monitoring. Such a large time slot is not appropriate, you should prefer a few weeks period as larger periods are difficult to remember. For example a the question: “have you had any cough or cold during last two weeks?” could be used. Actually health ministry uses data regarding respiratory diseases yo might use.
The recommendation is usefull.
Whenever possible, the time slot will be reduced and the specific sentence proposed will be used.
Q6: We don’t see any specific indicator for health when the main purpose of cookstove diffusion is to tackle health problems. Would it be possible to make a specific indicator that for?
The GS matrix does not consider specifically health but health can be included in living conditions. Matrix purpose if to define wether impact is negative, null or positive. Defining a specific health indicator is thus not adecuate.
Q7: Should there not be specific health impacts in the context of coosktove diffusion project in Lima ?
We cannot think of any different impact in Lima.
Health impact will be assessed threw questions included in the living condition indicator but with adecuate parameters.Further specific consideration about health will then be possible. Not relevant.
Q8: As women are the one who are in charge of cooking and biomass collecting, a positive impact on gender issues could not be monitored with related questions and be included as an indicator ? In general could’nt you monitor behavior changes, let’s say more qualitative impacts ?
Gender issues are not considered as such in GS Matrix. It could thus be included in living conditions but the additional cost of such a unnecessary monitoring could be a barrier for doing so.
Whenever possible, if simple question corresponding is defined, gender and behaviour issues might be assessed, thus, it is not considered as compulsory.
Q9: As far as deforestation is concerned, impact should be difficult to assess as other factors could influence the wood offer.WWhat is the conception of logging that you have? General logging? Parcial logging?
Other factors could influence the forestation but it is then not related to project activity and its impact should be considered outside such influences unless direct relation is demonstrated. Eventual overconsumption due
Not relevant.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
38
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Biomass renewability? Also, what is the indicator used for forest land? Which studies are you refering to, for this indicator? Q10: There is a positive impact as promoters of clean energy services. Why do you place it as neutral? Q11: As improved coosktoves imply using less biomass, deforestation reduces, then soil is maintained and erosion is reduced so you could consider soil condition being positively impacted by the project. Q12: The simple fact of saving forests should be easily related to preserving the biodiversity living in it if you find relevant documentation showing this.
to disponibility is assessed in leakage 1 (rebound effect) but shoulf not be considered in the SD matrix. Other mùentioned aspects are assessed in NRB Looking at it that way it, the impact could be considered as positive.
Positive impact will be claimed for.
Looking at it that way it, the impact could be considered as positive.
Whenever convincing study is found, positive impact will be claimed for.
Looking at it that way it, the impact could be considered as positive.
Whenever convincing study is found, positive impact will be claimed for.
Q13: The reduction in ash availability coulf not have a negative impact in agricultural production when ash would be use as an organic fertilizer?
Ash use for fertilizing is not a massive habit, on the contrary of dung.
Not relevant.
Q14: You have considered impact on quality of employment as neutral, nevertheless project activities implies job creation, you should be able to easily demonstrate how such jobs implies beter quality as wages are higher than those in current situation.
Looking at it that way it, the impact could be considered as positive.
Whenever convincing data is obtained, positive impact will be claimed for.
Q15: Couldn’t we consider that woods savings induces water preservation thanks to reduced deforestation, As far as I know, forest coverings induce water preservation...
Looking at it that way it, the impact could be considered as positive.
Whenever convincing data is obtained, positive impact will be claimed for.
iii. Revisit sustainability assessment
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
39
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
[See Toolkit 2.7] Yes Are you going to revisit the sustainable development assessment?
No
x
Give reasoning behind the decision. Even though we initially though not to be able to demonstrate the positive impact on several indicator, stakeholder consultation comments brought us ways to do so that we consider as potentially credible.
iv. Summary of alterations based on comments 4 indicators pass from null to positive: - Soil condition - Biodiversity - Quality of employment - Access to affordable and clean energy services - Water quality and quantity
SECTION C.
C.1.
Sustainable Development Matrix
Own sustainable development matrix
Indicator
Mitigation measure
Gold Standard indicators of sustainable development.
If relevant copy mitigation measure from "do no harm" – table, or include mitigation measure used to neutralise a score of ‘–‘
Air quality
Relevance to achieving MDG Check www.undp.o r/mdg and www.mdgm onitor.org
Chosen parameter and explanation
Preliminary score
Defined by project developer
Negative impact: score ‘-‘ in case negative impact is not fully mitigated score 0 in case impact is planned to be fully mitigated No change in impact: score 0 Positive impact: score ‘+’
Strong presumption of positive impact : - reduction of wood burning induces a proportional reduction of all toxic
+
Describe how your indicator is related to local MDG goals
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
40
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Water quality and quantity Soil condition
Other pollutants Biodiversity
Quality of employment
Livelihood of the poor Access to affordable and clean energy services Human and institutional capacity
Quantitative employment and income generation
gases, - bettering of the combustion through use of the efficient cookstove1. No significant impact. Presumption of positive secondary impact on soil condition (diminution of erosion caused by deforestation), but impossible to assess. Not relevant. Strong presumption of positive secondary impact on biodiversity conservation (preservation of ecosystems through diminution of deforestation), but impossible to assess. Presumption of direct positive impact (technical nature of the jobs, capacity-building on environment and health issues for the workers), but impossible to monitor. Major positive impact.
+ 0
0 0
0
+
The project activities do bring an improvement to an existing energy service. It does not facilitate access to an additional energy service. The project activities are mainly based on: - the empowerment of all actors of the chain; - the involvement of the final beneficiaries.
0
Important direct employment for construction, capacity building and consciousness-raising. Slight long-term employment for maintenance, follow-up.
+
+
General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves), Aprovecho Center (www.aprovecho.org). For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco San Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol office. 1
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
41
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Balance of payments and investment Technology transfer and technological self-reliance
Not relevant
0
The projects allows a complete technological self reliance, as it focuses on: - Direct knowledge of the populations; - Replicability of the technology.
+
Justification choices, data source and provision of references Air quality
Water quality and quantity Soil condition
General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves), Aprovecho Center (www.aprovecho.org). For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco San Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol office. The project activities do not consider water supply. It has not incidence on this indicator.
Other pollutants Biodiversity Quality of employment Livelihood of the poor
A World Health Organization report2 on the emissions related to the use of cook-stove in the Cusco region of Peru show a positive impact on the intra-domiciliary air quality. It shows also that when the user is well trained, the emission of certain gases is almost disappearing from the house. Intra-domiciliary smokes being a major cause for respiratory diseases3, the health of the children and the women is therefore highly improved thanks to the appropriate use of their improved cook-stove. Besides, the poverty is therefore reduced thanks to an economy of time or money (the fuel is either gathered or bought). More time and / or money is available for education / productive activity purposes.General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves),
“Los efectos de las cocinas tradicionales y las cocinas mejoradas en épocas de friaje en cuatro localidades de extrema pobreza de las zonas altoandinas del departamento de Cusco, Perú”, Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) – Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), 2007. This document can be consulted on the following web page: http://www.per.ops-oms.org/doc/seminario-polu/Informe-monitoreo-Cusco.pdf 2
Global information: “Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78 (9)”: http://www.who.int/docstore/bulletin/pdf/2000/issue9/bul0711.pdf For the more specific case of Peru: “Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Neumología, vol. 48, n°2”: http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVrevistas/enfermedades_torax/v48_n2/Pdf/a06.pdf
3
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
42
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Aprovecho Center (www.aprovecho.org). For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco San Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol office.
Global information: “Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78 (9)”: http://www.who.int/docstore/bulletin/pdf/2000/issue9/bul0711.pdf For the more specific case of Peru: “Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Neumología, vol. 48, n°2”: http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVrevistas/enfermedades_torax/v48_n2/Pdf/a06.pdf Access to affordable and clean energy services Human and institutional capacity
The purpose of the activities is to disseminate as far as possible the knowledge of the technology and of the proper ways to implement / use it. Firstly, the empowerment will focus on the workers of the LPPs. Then appropriate training programs will empower directly specific persons of the communities. In the end, all families will be given the possibility to understand / maintain & take care of / replicate / use properly their cook-stove. An appropriate level of involvement of the poorest is then implemented, as the final beneficiaries are actors and not only beneficiaries of the project. This, besides making possible a structural change of habits in traditional communities, raises the consciousness of the poorest in three directions: - health and related good practices; - environment and related good practices; - own ability to better their own life standards The empowerment, capacity-building and consciousness raising processes defined here are a formal requisite for any project to enter the PoA. PoA and VPA should be checked in order to verify this assessment.
Quantitative employment and income generation Balance of payments and investment Technology transfer and technological self-reliance
The project is fully replicable, and designed to be so. Indeed, the core of the project is to build a chain of knowledge transfer, that has two purposes: - That the people who build the technology and who train the users would master the whole aspects (technical, sociological, methodological) of the technology. This makes the project sustainable, as the maintenance is permitted within the communities. - That the people who build the technology and who train the users are local people: this guarantees that the technological and therefore cultural change is accepted, as it implemented by the very people who are the final users. Besides, the project is implemented in coordination with the institutional framework of the country, and employees from these institutions are trained to manage and accompany this kind
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
43
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
of technology-introduction activities. Direct knowledge and replicability capacity are guaranteed by the project, as it is a formal requisite for a community to enter the LPPs projects to commit themselves in receiving the knowledge so that at least a member of the community has this knowledge and is able to replicate the technology. PoA and VPA can be checked in order to verify this assessment.
Comments accompanying own sustainable development matrix
C.2.
Outcome Blind sustainable development exercise
[See Toolkit 2.6.1] Indicator
Mitigation measure
Chosen parameter and explanation
Score given by stakeholders
Gold Standard indicators of sustainable development.
If relevant copy mitigation measure from "do no harm" – table, or include mitigation measure used to neutralise a score of ‘–‘
Defined by project developer
Negative impact: score ‘-‘ in case negative impact is not fully mitigated score 0 in case impact is planned to be fully mitigated No change in impact: score 0 Positive impact: score ‘+’
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
44
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Air quality
The presence of a chimeney as been found acceptable but specific factors such as the presence of particular material and toxic gases have been found usefull but corresponding monitoring costs unadecuate. Wood fuel savings.
+
Wood fuel savings.
+
Other pollutants
Not relevant.
0
Biodiversity
Wood fuel savings.
+
Quality of employment
wages of project workers Parameters for health impact such as eye irritation and cough and cold during the last 3 weeks.
+
Water quality and quantity Soil condition
Livelihood of the poor
Access to affordable and clean energy services Human and institutional capacity Quantitative employment and income generation Balance of payments and investment Technology transfer and technological self-reliance
+
+
Coosktoves difused.
+
Not been discussed specifically Not been discussed specifically
+
Not been discussed specifically Not been discussed specifically
0
+
+
Comments resulting from the blind sustainable development exercise Stakeholder consultation has allowed for a major number of indicators with positive scores, giving advices on way of proof. Give analysis of difference between own sustainable development table and the one resulting from the blind exercise with stakeholders. Explain way of consolidation. As major differences comes from considering simple parameters for some parameters and believing studies to be available for other indicators, the first type will be directly taken into account without further consideration and an additional research will be done for accepting the second type. Whenever no relevant study has been found as opposed to stakeholder consultation declaration, initial scoring will be maintained.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
45
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
C.3.
Consolidated sustainable development matrix
Indicator
Mitigation measure
Relevance to achieving MDG
Gold Standard indicators of sustainable development.
If relevant copy mitigation measure from "do no harm" –table, or include mitigation measure used to neutralise a score of ‘–‘
For this section we list the 8 goals, in order to quote them faster in the following cells. Goal 1 End poverty and hunger Goal 2 Universal education Goal 3 Gender equality Goal 4 Child Health Goal 5 Maternal Health Goal 6 Combat HIV/ AIDS Goal 7 Environmental Sustainability Goal 8 Global Partnership
Air quality
Water quality and quantity
Soil condition
Other pollutants Biodiversity
Quality of employment Livelihood of the poor Access to affordable and clean energy services Human and institutional capacity
Quantitative employment
Contributes to goal 4 and 5 as children and women, specifically pregnant ones, are first victims of bad indoor air quality. Contributes to target 7.B in Water quantity: - 7.5 Proportion of total water resources used Water quality: - 7.8 Proportion of population using an improved drinking water source. Contributes to target 7.B: 7.1 Proportion of land area covered by forest. N/A
Chosen parameter and explanatio n Defined by project developer
Final score
To be defined at VPA level To be defined at VPA level
+
To be defined at VPA level N/A
+
Negative impact: score ‘–‘ in case negative impact is not fully mitigated score 0 in case impact is planned to be fully mitigated No change in impact: score 0 Positive impact: score ‘+’
+
0
Contributes to target 7.B: Reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a significant reduction in the rate of loss. Contributes to target 1.B.5. Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young people Contributes to goal 4 and 5 as children and women, specifically pregnant ones, are first victims of bad indoor air quality. Contributes to goal 1 and 4 and 5 as children and women, specifically pregnant ones, are first victims of bad indoor air quality.
To be defined at VPA level To be defined at VPA level To be defined at VPA level To be defined at VPA level
+
Contributes to target 7.A: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources. Contributes to Target 1.B Achieve full and productive employment and decent work
To be defined at VPA level
+
To be defined at
+
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
+
+
+
46
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
and income generation
Balance of payments and investment Technology transfer and technological self-reliance
for all, including women and young people -1.5 Employment-to-population ratio. As this is an extensive program there is no limit in the amount of workers that would be needed, considering national boundaries and norms. N/A
Contributes to Target 8.F: In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies, especially information and communications
VPA level
N/A
0
To be defined at VPA level
+
Justification choices, data source and provision of references Air quality
Water quality and quantity
Biomass cookstoves or traditional cookstoves are usually placed within the household, therefore the smoke and particulates produced by the combustion affect the people inside the house. An improved cookstoves on the other side presents a chimeney that helps in the expulsion of the smoke (along with the particles) to the outside. General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves), Aprovecho Center (www.aprovecho.org). Specific on indoor air quality and cookstoves: http://www.hedon.info/1497/news.htm and http://www.aprovecho.org/lab/issuelist/indoorair. For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco San Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol office. 4 Inefficient use of fuel wood is considered one of the important causes of deforestation . An improved cookstove permits savings in the biomass fuel used because of the efficiency level (in comparison with a traditional cookstove), therefore it is considered to have influence on the biomass stock. So, as it is proved that the forests act as a regulator for the watersheds that provide water, then implementing improved stoves contributes to water quality and availability. General literature: FAO. Programa Agua y Bosques –Departamento de Foresteria. 2005. Consultado el 13 de Octubre del 2009. On internet: http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/40417/es/ (“Influencia en el régimen de aguas”, 2nd theme) Peruvian case: Grupo de Trabajo Multisectorial Preparación del Ministerio del Ambiente. Diagnostico Ambiental del Perú. 2008. Internet consultation: http://www.spda.org.pe/portal/_data/spda/documentos/20080331180832_Grupo%20Multi. pdf (page: 44, 2nd paragraph).
Soil condition
Inefficient use of fuel wood is considered one of the important causes of deforestation5. An improved cookstove permits savings in the biomass fuel used because of the
4
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V78-47GY924B&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1165330136&_re runOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=e4f5606a26a831bd54f 3eda24eb6f8f5 5
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V78-47GY924B&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1165330136&_re runOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=e4f5606a26a831bd54f 3eda24eb6f8f5
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
47
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
efficiency level (in comparison with a traditional cookstove), therefore it is considered to have influence on the biomass stock. So, as it is proved that the forests act as a regulator for soil condition, then implementing improved stoves contributes to water quality and availability.
General literature: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente -PNUMA. La Campaña de los Mil millones de árboles. On internet: http://www.unep.org/billiontreecampaign/spanish/FactsFigures/FastFacts/index.asp (number 13 and 16) FAO. Programa Agua y Bosques –Departamento de Foresteria. 2005. Consultado el 13 de Octubre del 2009. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/40417/es/ (“Reducción de la erosión del suelo por la acción del agua”, first theme)
Other pollutants
Biodiversity
SPECIFIC CASE OF PERU Grupo de Trabajo Multisectorial Preparación del Ministerio del Ambiente. Diagnostico Ambiental del Perú. 2008. Consultado el 13 de Octubre del 2009. Disponible en: http://www.spda.org.pe/portal/_data/spda/documentos/20080331180832_Grupo%20Multi. pdf (page 105, number 50) No major contribution to reducing other pollutants than those considered in the air quality indicator can be identified has been identified. Inefficient use of fuel wood is considered one of the important causes of deforestation6. An improved cookstove permits savings in the biomass fuel used because of the efficiency level (in comparison with a traditional cookstove), therefore it is considered to have influence on the biomass stock. So, as it is proved that the forests are have a major contribution to biosiversity conservation, then implementing improved stoves contributes to water quality and availability. General Literature: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente -PNUMA. La Campaña de los Mil millones de árboles. On the internet: http://www.unep.org/billiontreecampaign/spanish/FactsFigures/QandA/index.asp (Number 4:“¿Cuales son las funciones protectoras de los bosques?”) Nath, Bhaskar; Hens, Luc; Compton, Paul & Devuyst, Dimitri, (eds.) Environmental Management in Practice: Vol. 3: Managing the Ecosystem. 1999. Routledge, London. ISBN 0 415 18791 5. On the internet: http://books.google.com.pe/books?id=wA40012ZjM0C&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=Environme ntal+Management+in+Practice:+Managing+the+ecosystem++Bhaskar+Nath&source=bl& ots=EqUuQX0GZ&sig=PkWV2AFiPH25pgYoSWWkgA6FxnY&hl=es&ei=ScDUSraVA8eX8Aahz 5yRDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q =&f=false (page 189, 2nd paragraph)
For the specific case of Peru: Grupo de Trabajo Multisectorial Preparación del Ministerio del Ambiente. Diagnostico Ambiental del Perú. 2008. Consultado el 13 de Octubre del 2009. Disponible en:
6
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V78-47GY924B&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1165330136&_re runOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=e4f5606a26a831bd54f 3eda24eb6f8f5
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
48
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
http://www.spda.org.pe/portal/_data/spda/documentos/20080331180832_Grupo%20Multi. pdf (page 145, number 290), (page114, number 106 and 109)
Quality of employment
Livelihood of the poor
In a country with high level of self-employment, being employed with a wage at minimum level represents a good position especially in a rural context where projects generally occur. A World Health Organization report7 on the emissions related to the use of cook-stove in the Cusco region of Peru show a positive impact on the intra-domiciliary air quality. It shows also that when the user is well trained, the emission of certain gases is almost disappearing from the house. 8 Intra-domiciliary smokes being a major cause for respiratory diseases , the health of the children and the women is therefore highly improved thanks to the appropriate use of their improved cook-stove.
Besides, the poverty is therefore reduced thanks to an economy of time or money (the fuel is either gathered or bought). More time and / or money is available for education / productive activity purposes.General literature: Hedon (http://www.hedon.info/Category:ImprovedStoves), Aprovecho Center (www.aprovecho.org). For the Peruvian more specific case, doctorate thesis of Jesús Angel Baca Flores “Design, Construction and Evaluation of efficient wood stoves”, Cusco San Antonio Abad University (UNSAAC). Available for consultation in Lima, Microsol office.
Global information: “Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78 (9)”: http://www.who.int/docstore/bulletin/pdf/2000/issue9/bul0711.pdf For the more specific case of Peru: “Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Neumología, vol. 48, n°2”: http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVrevistas/enfermedades_torax/v48_n2/Pdf/a06.pdf Access to affordable and clean energy services Human and institutional capacity
The project induces the diffusion of efficient cook-stove which are cost savings and clean technologies. The purpose of the activities is to disseminate as far as possible the knowledge of the technology and of the proper ways to implement / use it. Firstly, the empowerment will focus on the workers of the LPPs. Then appropriate training programs will empower directly specific persons of the communities. In the end, all families will be given the possibility to understand / maintain & take care of / replicate / use properly their cookstove. An appropriate level of involvement of the poorest is then implemented, as the final beneficiaries are actors and not only beneficiaries of the project. This, besides making possible a structural change of habits in traditional communities, raises the consciousness of the poorest in three directions: - health and related good practices;
“Los efectos de las cocinas tradicionales y las cocinas mejoradas en épocas de friaje en cuatro localidades de extrema pobreza de las zonas altoandinas del departamento de Cusco, Perú”, Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) – Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), 2007. This document can be consulted on the following web page: http://www.onu.org.pe/upload/noticias/Informe_monitoreo_Cusco.pdf 7
Global information: “Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78 (9)”: http://www.who.int/docstore/bulletin/pdf/2000/issue9/bul0711.pdf (page 1, Resume: paragraph 2 and 3) For the more specific case of Peru: “Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Neumología, vol. 48, n°2”: http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVrevistas/enfermedades_torax/v48_n2/Pdf/a06.pdf (page 1, Resume: paragraph 5 and 6)
8
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
49
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Quantitative employment and income generation Balance of payments and investment
Technology transfer and technological selfreliance
- environment and related good practices; - own ability to better their own life standards The empowerment, capacity-building and consciousness raising processes defined here are a formal requisite for any project to enter the PoA. Projects induce personal contracting for coordination and for technical profession on the fields. For this job local people of the community are often contracted. Those job mean income generation. As well as wood savings mean direct (when buying fuel) or indirect (saving time) income. The level of importation due to project activity should be assessed. As a requirement is to favor local materials and the one and only material that could be produced with imported material is iron spare parts (that definitively could not be considered as significant in relation with general iron importation) an impact on balance of payment is very unlikely. LPPs are due to transfer knowledge at community level so impact is positive for project participant.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
50
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
SECTION D. Preparation of Stakeholder Feedback Round
Based on the outcome of stakeholder consultation process, we will submit our new matrix to all email addresses signed up in the participants list. Nevertheless, a link will be posted at our website were the report will be downloadable for every user. This is the schedule we will follow. a) b) c) d) e)
Preparation of website information to be downloaded. Invitations to see the new matrix. Reception of comments. Until Process and validation from comments Until Final report
Friday 23th October Monday 26th October Friday 6 th November Friday the 13 th November Monday 16th November
We consider that online feedback round will be faster and more effectively than a live one because: -
All information is easily canalized because of the placed items of discussion It is adjustable for everyone’s time, considering that all of our invitees belong to some type of institution and have regular jobs. It allows also the ones that did not attend the consultation, so we can have new perspectives and opinions.
Initially, we consider prudent to keep a two week period for checking the new matrix, so everyone can have enough time besides their own time limitations. After this time, we didn’t receive any comments. Eventually this time period was extended up for two months. For that, we posted at our official website all relevant information for stakeholder comments. This can be found in:
http://www.microsol-int.com/consulta%20publica.php. This website is open up to date. Still, we didn’t receive any more comments.
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
51
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Annex 1: Participant list
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
52
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
53
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
54
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
55
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation Report
Annex 2: Feedback forms As we received feedback forms through the mail, we have no prints of them, but the reception dates of those e-mails, which are: Name Carlos Aparicio Arrieta Mariela Lévano Víctor A. Quinto Ushiñahua Carlos Landa Ponte
Date October 2nd September 30th September 30th October 1st
Gold Standard Passport version 2.0 July 2008 Developed by Ecofys, TÜV-SÜD and FIELD
56
