Global Best Practice for Managing Innovation Ecosystems and Hubs

Dr. Martti Launonen Chairman of the Board, Hubconcepts Inc. [email protected]

Copyright and all rights reserved.

Global innovation trends and emerging challenges for innovation creation - Value network advantage & competition - Open innovation model in borderless, connected world - Management of continuous change (scanning & driving) - Virtualization of interconnections (scale effect) - Management of global partnerships - Ability to connect talent, network, clusters & processes

The development focus shifts to managing innovation partnerships and networks

Copyright and all rights reserved.

2

A successful innovation system must include: 1. Strong basis in local know-how and pool of talent 2. Clear target to achieve international best-practice 3. Global reach and goals 4. Networking relationships with the top-runners 5. Access to continuous flow of attractive players

It is all about collaboration in global context

Copyright and all rights reserved.

3

Practical development targets for the regional innovation eco-systems

National or Regional Innovation System

Public support

Regional pre-conditions: 1 – potential of existing innovation system (=audits) 2 – willingness to utilise this potential (=active participation)

4-5 years

Joint R&D

Regional and global development programs

Joint Innovation capacity Joint Commercialization Joint Platforms

2-3 years

Copyright and all rights reserved.

Support for growth companies

Global hubs and innovation labs

on-going

4

Background for Hub Framework Development 1. Visits and discussions in over 250 science & technology parks 2. Consultation for over 100 STPs, innovation centers and clusters 3. Advisory work for foreign governments and STPs 4. Hands-on management of STPs, regional programs, clusters & centers 5. Tested on selected (7) best-practice sites around the world Countries and sites include: USA, China, Russia, Japan, South-Korea, Canada, UK, France, Poland, Croatia, Estonia, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Australia, New-Zealand, South-Africa, Mozambique, Botswana, Namibia, Thailand

Copyright and all rights reserved.

6

The global innovation HUB development concept

Anchors Growth SMEs Start-ups “Smart Handover”

Company and forum driven activities

Incubation Environments Living Labs / Test-Beds Cluster Policies & Programs

Public-private partnerships

Research & Development Activities Education (elementary to university)

Public policy driven activities

Physical Infrastructure and Service Structures National /Regional Innovation Policy Copyright and all rights reserved.

7

Hubconcepts’ case studies 2010: The global best practice for developing the regional innovation environments and hubs ASIA Daejeon, The Republic of Korea Shanghai, The People’s Republic of China Kanagawa, Japan USA Silicon Valley, California Research Triangle Park, North Carolina EUROPE Sophia Antipolis, France Cambridge, United Kingdom

Copyright and all rights reserved.

8

Case: Daejeon, Korea

70 70 Anchors Growth 70 SMEs Start-ups 60 40 Incubation Environments 20

Living Labs / Test-Beds

40Cluster Policies & Programs 80Development Activities Research & Education (elementary to university) 70 70 Physical Infrastructure and Service Structures National /Regional 90Innovation Policy

Copyright and all rights reserved.

9

Case: Shanghai, China Residenti al Zone Semiconductor Phase I

Biotech & Pharma Phase I Technology Innovation Area

100 Anchors Semiconductor Phase II Scientific Research and Education Zone

60 Growth SMEs 50 Start-ups

Biotech & Pharma Phase II

50 Incubation Environments 30Living Labs / Test-Beds 40Cluster Policies & Programs Research 70 & Development Activities Education (elementary to university) 70 80 and Service Structures Physical Infrastructure National /Regional 90 Innovation Policy

Copyright and all rights reserved.

10

Case: Kanagawa, Japan

Kanagawa Science Park (KSP) Haneda Airport

KBIC/K² 70 Anchors

THINK = Major industrial R&D site

Kawasaki Waterfront Area

50 Growth SMEs 40

Start-ups

50 Incubation Environments 50 Labs / Test-Beds Living 40Cluster Policies & Programs Research & Development Activities 80 Education (elementary to university) 70 Physical Infrastructure and Service Structures 80 National /Regional 80 Innovation Policy

Copyright and all rights reserved.

11

Case: Silicon Valley, CA USA

UC Berkeley UC San Francisco

100 Anchors

Stanford University

90 SMEs Growth

The Silicon Valley outline

90 Start-ups Incubation100 Environments Living 80 Labs / Test-Beds 60Policies & Programs Cluster Research & Development Activities 90 100 Education (elementary to university) Physical Infrastructure90 and Service Structures 80 Innovation Policy National /Regional

Copyright and all rights reserved.

12

Case: Research Triangle Park, NC USA The RTP The Triangle Region

70 Anchors 50 Growth SMEs 40 Start-ups 50 Incubation Environments 40 Living Labs / Test-Beds 40 Cluster Policies & Programs Research & Development Activities 80 80 Education (elementary to university) 80 and Service Structures Physical Infrastructure National /Regional 80 Innovation Policy

Copyright and all rights reserved.

13

Case: Sophia Antipolis, France Côte d’Azur Sophia Antipolis

Anchors 90 70 SMEs Growth 50Start-ups 40 Incubation Environments 70Labs / Test-Beds Living 80 Cluster Policies & Programs Research & Development Activities 80 Education (elementary to university) 80 Physical Infrastructure 80 and Service Structures 90 Innovation Policy National /Regional

Copyright and all rights reserved.

14

Case: Cambridge, UK

80 Anchors 70 SMEs Growth 70 Start-ups 70 Environments Incubation 30 Living Labs / Test-Beds

= a science and technology park = a university

Cluster 60 Policies & Programs 90 Research & Development Activities 90 Education (elementary to university) Physical Infrastructure80 and Service Structures National /Regional 80 Innovation Policy

Copyright and all rights reserved.

15

Key Features of Future Cities Large scale urban development

• Industrial corridors • Smart cities • Urban renewal programs

Impact of energy efficiency

• From CFL to LED revolution • Smart grids • Green buildings/industries

Meeting mobility needs

Managing water for future

• Public transportation (BRT, Monorail, Metro rail) • Shared vehicle services • NMT (Non-motorized transit) Electric Vehicle • Reducing non revenue water (NRW) • Re-use and recycle • Water treatment

• Waste to energy Meeting energy demand through • Renewable energy Non-Conventional sources • Bio – Energy Smart Service delivery

• Outsourcing • PPP • E- governance

CONFIDENTIAL

Copyright and all rights reserved.

Complementing Development Layers

3. Innovation Capacity Base • University Education Projects • Vocational Training Centers • Library master plans 2. Green Buildings & Districts • Design guidelines • Eco-City KPI‘s • Sustainability guidelines 1. Smart City Master Plan • Smart government • Smart grids • Smart business • Smart lifestyle

CONFIDENTIAL

Copyright and all rights reserved.

The 3-in-1 Future Cities

Smart City

Integrated Operating Center Smart Homes E-Health IC Card Security Systems E-government Solutions

Eco City

District cooling/heating Distributed Energy Systems Water management Waste management Electric Vehicle (EV) Systems Renewable energy Systems

Learning City

Innovation/R&D Clusters Eco-Technologies R&D 3-in-1 City Related R&D Programs and Projects Virtual learning / classrooms Vocational Education Centers

Smart Grid / Micro Grid + Common IT Platform + Cloud Computing Strategy Intelligent Transportation and Mobility

CONFIDENTIAL

Copyright and all rights reserved.

Otaniemi 90 Anchors 70 SMEs Growth

80 Anchor s Growth 70 SMEs

50Start-ups

Start-ups 70

Incubation Environments 40

Incubation 70 Environments

Living 70 Labs / Test-Beds

30 Living Labs / Test-Beds

80 Cluster Policies & Programs

60 Policies & Programs Cluster

80 Research & Development Activities

Research & Development Activities 90

Education (elementary to university) 80

Education (elementary to university) 90

Physical Infrastructure 80 and Service Structures

Physical Infrastructure 80 and Service Structures

90

80 Innovation Policy National /Regional

Sophia Antipolis, France

Cambridge, UK

Otaniemi, Finland 18

Operations Evaluation -> Roadmap -> Implementation

II: Target profile

I: Present profile

Ankkurit Kasvuyritykset Pk-yritykset

Ankkurit Kasvuyritykset Pk-yritykset Hautomoympäristöt Testiympäristöt ja -alustat Klusteriohjelmat T&K ympäristö Koulutus (perusopetuksesta yliopistoihin) Fyysiset ympäristö ja palvelurakenteet Kansalliset ja alueelliset ohjelmat ja säädösympäristö

Roadmap

III. Implementation

Hautomoympäristöt Testiympäristöt ja -alustat Klusteriohjelmat T&K ympäristö Koulutus (perusopetuksesta yliopistoihin) Fyysinen ympäristö ja palvelurakenteet Kansalliset ja alueelliset ohjelmat ja säädösympäristö

Copyright and all rights reserved.

17

Innovation is both global and local

Networking Open innovation Shared

Interconnected

Virtual

New book published in January 2011 ! - Hubconcepts The Global Best-Practice for managing the innovation hubs and STPs

www.hubconcepts.com Copyright and all rights reserved.

16