Forest Tenure in Indonesia The socio-Iegal challenges of securing communities' rights
PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. rnr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Prornoties te verdedigen op woensdag 15 decernber 2010 klokke 11.15 uur
door
Myrna Asnawati Safitri
geboren te Sarnarinda, Indonesie
in 1969
Promotiecommissie: Promotor:
prof. dr. J.M. OUo
Overige leden:
prof. dr. ir. P. Ho prof. dr. T. Rahmadi (Universitas Andalas, Indonesie) dr. A.W. Bedner dr. ir. J.A.C. Vel
To Indonesia
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Finishing this book means more than just completing a PhD project: it also means a partial fulfilment of my moral obligation to share lessons of facilitating a community in having their rights on land and forest resources legally recognized by the state. The village of Langkawana in Lampung is the place which offered me this experience. The institution which enabled me to do this was the Program for Research and Development of Ecological Anthropology, University of Indonesia (Program Penelitian
dan Pengembangan Antropologi Ekologi-Universitas Indonesia, P3AE-UI), where I worked for almost a decade in research and community facilitation. The position of reseacher and program manager at this institute and the interaction with the Langkawana villagers have shaped my understanding about law and order, science, human beings and life. Thus, I would like to express my respect to all Langkawana villagers and my ex-colleagues at P3AE-UI: Iwan Tjitradjaja, Bediona Philipus, Keron A. Petrus, Prudensius Maring, Heriyanti O. Untoro, Slamet Riyanto, Joko Susilo, Dewi Yunita, Katijah, Nurmala and Boy. The INDlRA Project (Indonesian-Netherlands Studies on Decentralization of the Indonesian'Rechtstaat' and its impact on Agraria) of the Van Vollenhoven Institute of Leiden University and its Indonesian partner Andalas University provided me with the opportunity to carry out professional research, while rethinking my past involvement in NGO networks and movements of legal reform in Indonesia. This project introduced me to a type of collaboration built upon sharing, learning and support among colleagues. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Jan Michiel OUo, as my promotor and team leader of INDlRA. I would like to thank the other researchers of the INDlRA project: the late Djaka Soehendera, Tristam Moeliono, Sandra Moniaga, Kurnia Warman, Gustaaf Reerink, Laurens Bakker, Saldi Isra, Sulastryono. Various means of communication and collaboration, listening and sharing inspired me to develop my research topic as well as to maintain our personal relations. I would also like to thank those who were always willing to comment on my research design, articles and chapters: Adriaan Bedner, Jacqueline Vel, Daniel Fitzpatrick, Jamie Davidson, Marjanne Termorshuizen-Arts, Herman Slaats, and Karen Portier. Similarly, I am much indebted to Albert Dekker for his amazing assistance in searching and providing literature and to Hannah Mason for her assistance in language editing. To Takdir Rahmadi, Jan van Olden, Marianne Moria, Kari van Weeren, Kora Bentvelsen I am most grateful for their administrative support as well as for the personal relationship during the last seven years. I am thankful to Laure, Stijn, Herlambang, Rikardo, Anton, Ken, Maria - all PhD researchers at Van Vollenhoven Institute.
In Lampung, I am grateful to Edi Sutanto who assisted me in collecting data. Also, I would like to express my appreciation of all my informants in the villages of Gedong Gajah, Kebagusan and Mataram Raja, activists of NGOs, mainly from Watala, officials of the Provincial Forestry Service and the Regional Office of the National Land Agency, officials of the Central Lampung Forestry Service, members of Provincial and District Councils and Armein Yasser of the Law School of the University of Lampung. The Ford Foundation at Jakarta fully supported this PhD project and research. Steve Rhee and Ujwall Pradhan were very helpful and I am much indebted to them. At the initial phase of my research, a small research grant of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) also supported me, thanks to Lini Wollenberg and Moira Moeliono. Konin7dijk Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW) also supported several of my visits to Leiden for courses and seminars as part of the INDIRA project. My colleagues at the Learning Centre HuMa (now called Episterna) took over part of my responsibilities while I was finalizing the thesis manuscript in Leiden in June 2010. I am grateful to Bernadinus Steni, Susilaningtias, Yance Arizona, Mumu Muhajir,
Andi Sandhi, Sri Sudarsih, Wiwin Widayanti, Alexander Juanda Putra and Nunu Rais dos Santos. To those who at that time were the board of Perkumpulan HuMa, Julia Kalmirah, Rival G. Ahmad and again, Rikardo Simarmata and Herlambang Perdana, I thank them for allowing me to leave the Learning Centre for a while to finalize the manuscript. I would also like to express my thanks to Asep Y. Firdaus and Susi Fauziah who assisted in managing the administration of the INDIRA Project in 20062009. I especially appreciate the sincerity of my husband, Hanief, and my children: Aisha Nadha Audina, Fardhian Danieal Firdaus, Bary Ali Irhamni. I apologise to them whose rights of husband and children could often not be realised during the process of writing this book. My father, Muhammad Fuad Arieph, and my mother, Rukmini, never cease to encourage in whatever I do. I am thankful to them. Similarly, my thanks also go out to my brother, Otto Syahruzah, my sister-in law, Numl Palupi, and my sister, Ade Miranti for taking care of my children, while I was in Leiden. Finally, I recognize a very important role of two other women in my life: Ipat and Umi, who greatly supported me in domestic work. I consider them as heroes, they who have provided me with the liberty to work in the public sphere.
vi
CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LIST OF FIGURES, MAPS, TABLES ABBREVIATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 THE GLOBAL AND NATIONAL DIMENSIONS
V XV XVII 1
1
1.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS........••••.•.........•..•••.••.••.•....••....•..•.••.•••••••.......•..••••..•......•..•.•.•.....•....•••••. 7 1.3 RESEARCH METHOD ••.•••.•••••.........•.••.•.••..•.•.•......•••••••.••.••..•.•.....•..•••.••..........•••.........••..••••..•.... 8
(a) Lampung as research site (b) Data gathering: Opportunities and limitations 1.4 SlRUCTURE OF THE BOOK 2. FOREST TENURE SECURITY: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK.
8 11 16 19
2.1 INlRODUCTION
19
2.2 COMMUNITY, FOREST COMMUNITY AND DWELLERS
21
2.3 FOREST TENURE, PROPERTY RIGHTS, ACCESS
23
(a) Forest tenure systems and arrangement
23
(b) Property rights
24
(c) Access
26
to forest, rights and power
2.4 THE SECURITY OF COMMUNITY FOREST TENURE
28
(a) Normative tenure security
28
(b) Actual tenure security
30
(c)
Perceived tenure security
2.5 THE DYNAMICS OF COMMUNITY FOREST TENURE SECURITY
30
31
(a) Policy, legislation and projects
31
(b) State officials
32
(c)
Local institutions and authorities
32
(d) Social, political and economic forces and actors
33
(e) Physical and social conditions regarding forest utilization
33
2.6 CONCLUSION...•..•.•••...•..........•••.•.••..••.••••...•.......•.•.••••••...•.•....•...•.....•.•..•.........••.••.•••.•••.•.....•. 34 3. COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA: SOLVING TWO CENTURIES OF SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INJUSTICE?
3.1 INTRODUCTION
37
37
3.2 FOREST DESTRUCTION, POVERTY AND CONFLICT IN COLONIAL AND PRESENT INDONESIA ......... 38
3.3 FOREST AREAS: MALDISTRIBUTION AND INSECURITY
45
3.4 BREAKING THE LOGJAM THROUGH COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT: VARIOUS APPROACHES
47
3.5 A SHORT HISTORY OF LEGISLATION AND PROJECTS ON COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT..••.•••.•••..•.•.•............•.••..•.••.•.••..............•....•••.•.•.•.••.•.......•.•••••.••.........•••••••..•••• 50
(a) From colonial times until the end of the New-Order period (1800-1998)
50
(b) Post-New Order period (1998-present)
52
3.6 THE EMERGENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL FOREST LEGISLATION
55
3.7 CONCLUSION
61
4. FOREST TENURE AND MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA: THE NATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK
4.1 INTRODUCTION
67
67
4.2 LEGISLATION AND STATE INSTITUTIONS CONCERNING LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES .......... 69 4.3 STATE CONTROL ON LAND AND FOREST
73
(a) The legal basis of state's right of controlling land and forest
74
(b) Different interpretations and purposes of the state's right of control
76
4.4 THE STATE'S RIGHT OF CONTROL AND COMMUNITY PROPERTY RIGHTS ON LAND AND FOREST .. 80 4.5 STATE FOREST TENURE AND MANAGEMENT
87
(a) State and private forests
88
(b) Forest Areas
89
(c) The change of Forest Areas
98
(d) Forest functions
99
viii
(e) Forestry licensing 4.6 CONCLUSION
5. SOCIAL FOREST AND COMMUNITY PROPERTY RIGHTS IN NATIONAL LEGISLATION
102
104
111
5.1 INlRODUCTION•.••.•.•.•.•..••........•.•••••••.•............•.•••••.••••.••.•.•......•.•.•.•••.•......•..•••••••••...•..•......• 111 5.2 COMMUNITY RIGHTS IN FOREST AREAS: MODELS OF COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT
112
(a) Adat Forest
112
(b) Forest Area with Special Purpose
116
(c) Village Forest
117
(d) People's Plantation Forest
118
(e) Company-community partnership in forest management
119
if) Collaboration of conservation management
121
5.3 WAYS OF LEGALIZING COMMUNITY PROPERTY RIGHTS: LICENCE AND AGREEMENT, INCORPORATION AND INTEGRATION 5.4 SOCIAL FOREST LEGISLATION, FROM THE 1995 DECREE TO THE 2007 REGULATION
121 122
(a) The 1995 Ministerial Decree
123
b) The 1998 Ministerial Decree
124
(c) The 2001 Ministerial Decree
127
(d) The 2007 Ministerial Regulation
129
5.5 FOREST AREA: ANOTHER OBSTACLE TO SOCIAL FOREST.
132
5.6 CONCLUSION
132
6. MAN, LAND AND FOREST IN LAMPUNG
137
6.1lNlRODUCTION
137
6.2 THE SOCIAL AND ECOLOGICAL LANDSCAPES
137
6.3 PRE-COLONIAL AND COLONIAL LAMPUNG
139
6.4 MARGA: THE FORMATION AND MANIPULATION OF TRADITIONAL SOCIO-POLillCAL ORGANIZATION 6.5 LOCAL ADMINISTRATION IN POST-COLONIAL LAMPUNG
142 146
ix
6.6 KOLONISATIE, TRANSMIGRATION AND LAMPUNG MULTICULTIJRAL SOCIETY
148
6.7 DEVELOPMENT, SAVES NEITHER FOREST NOR PEOPLE
151
6.8 CONCLUSION
153
7. COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT IN LAMPUNG: REGIONAL POLICIES AND LEGISLATION AND ITS SOCIO-LEGAL OBSTACLES 155
7.1 INTRODUCTION
155
7.2 CHANGE AND CONTINUITY IN FORESTRY POLICIES AND LEGISLATION AT REGIONAL LEVELS ... 156
(a) Dutch colonial period (1856-1942): Forest for plantation and kolonisatie
156
(b) Japanese period (1942-1945): Wild forest occupation
158
(c) Early years of independence (1945-1950): Political disorder and the state failure in forest protection
158
(d) The Old Order (1950-1966): Politics, peasant movements and access to state forests .......... 159 (e) The New Order U966-mid 1998): State domination offorest and people
162
if) Post-Suharto until decentralization period (mid 1998-2000)
169
(g) What continues, what changed?
174
7.3 COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT IN LAMPUNG: POLICIES AND LEGISLATION IN 2000-2005
(a) Provincial Regulation 7/2000
177
178
(b) Way Kanan District Regulation 29/2002 and East Lampung District Regulation 16/2002.. 180 (c) West Lampung District Regulation 18/2004
181
(d) Central Lampung District Regulation 4/2004
183
7.4 SOCIAL FOREST POLICY STAGNATING, OLD LEGAL CULTURE RETURNING?
185
7.5 THE SOCIAL OBSTACLES
186
7.6 CONCLUSION
187
8. COMMUNITY FOREST TENURE IN LANGKAWANA
191
8.1 INTRODUCTION
191
8.2 LANGKAW ANA: ITS HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL LANDSCAPE
192
8.3 TANAH KAWASAN AND TANAH MARGA: LAND TENURE IN FOREST AND NON-FOREST AREA .... 196 8.4 COMMUNITY PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ACCESS TO LAND AND RESOURCES
200
x
(a) The emergence of land ownership
200
(b) Temporary land rights: Share-cropping, leasing, pledging, and free cultivation
202
(c) The power-based access to land and resources
204
8.5 THE GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMUNITY PROPERTY RIGHTS
204
8.6 FOREST TENURE SECURITY: COMMUNITY NORMS AND PEOPLE'S PERCEPTIONS
208
8.7 No LEGAL RECOGNITION OF COMMUNITY FOREST TENURE IN LANGKAWANA: SOME SURVNAL STRATEGIES OF ACHIEVING ACTUAL TENURE SECURITY
210
8.8 FORECASTING A CONFLICT: ANOTHER STRATEGY OF VILLAGERS
215
8.9 CONCLUSION
216
9. SOCIAL FOREST IN LANGKAWANA: FROM LICENSE TO SUPERVISION
219
9.1 INTRODUCTION•••••.•...•.•.••••.••..........•••••..........•••••••.•........••.••••.•...•...•••.•........•••.......••...••..•..• 219 9.2 THE DAWN OF HOPE: FOREST USER GROUPS AND THEIR RULES
220
9.3 SOCIAL FOREST LICENSE AND AGREEMENT •.....•.......•.••..•..••.•.•.••.••••.....•••..•.........••.........•..••.. 222
9.4 THE GRANTING OF THE SOCIAL FOREST LICENSE: AN ART OF NEGOTIATING THE LAW?
225
9.5 INCORPORATING COMMUNITY PROPERTY RIGHTS INTO SOCIAL FOREST LICENSE
227
9.6 BETTER SECURITY AND BETTER LIVELIHOOD IN THE FOREST AREA
229
9.7 LICENSE NO LONGER VALID: DID PEOPLE'S PERCEPTION OF FOREST TENURE SECURITY CHANGE?233 9.8 CONCLUSION
10. RETHINKING FOREST TENURE SECURITY
237
239
10.1 INTRODUCTION
239
10.2 LOGGING IN LANGKAWANA
240
10.3 LESSONS FOR CONSERVATION, DECENTRALIZATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ......... 243
(a) People's responses, interests, and the failure to listen to them
244
(b) Unresponsive local bureaucracy
247
(c) Disempowered local institutions
253
(d) Dilemmas of community facilitation
255
10.4 CONCLUSION
258
xi
11. LAND CONFLICTS AS A CHALLENGE TO SOCIAL FOREST POLICy 11.1 INTRODUCTION
261 261
11.2 THE CONFLICT CASE OF TANGKIT BUKU JADI: CHANGING STRATEGIES OF FOREST VILLAGERS262
(a) A briefhistory offorest, people and conflicts
262
(b) Law, identity and land claims
266
(c) The release of Forest Area and its impact on communal conflicts
266
(d) Dreaming of Social Forest license
268
(e) What can be expected from Social Forest license?
270
11.3 THE CONFLICT CASES OF WAY KEJAYAAN: A POLICY FAILURE OF POLmCO-ADMINISTRATIVE FOREST
271
(a) Forest and people in Way Kejayaan
271
(b) The politico-administrative processes of the designation ofWay Kejayaan Forest Area
273
(c) Conflicts between the Lampungese and private plantations
277
(d) Conflicts among migrants and different perspectives on Social Forest
280
(e) The 2004 Central Lampung District Regulation on Social Forest: Who benefits from the law?
283
11.4 CONCLUSION
284
12. CONCLUSION: REFORMING FOREST TENURE LAW IN INDONESIA; WHICH WAY FORWARD? 287 12.1 INTRODUCTION
287
12.2 THE LIMITED LEGAL SECURITY OF COMMUNITY PROPERTY RIGHTS AND STATE RIGHTS ON FOREST AREAS ••..•.••..........•.••.•••..............•••...........••••..•.•.•.••.•.......•..••.•...•.•••..•.....•..•.•••......•..•..•....... 288
(a) Robustness
289
(b) Duration
290
(c) Legal protection
290
12.3 SECURING COMMUNITY PROPERTY RIGHTS THROUGH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAW
292
(a) Legal tenure security in community-based forestry licensing
293
(b) Legal tenure security in agreements on community-based forest management
295
(c) Does contrasting public and private law and rights matter?
296
xii
12.4 SOCIAL FOREST IN POST-1998 INDONESIA: THE SOCIO-LEGAL FACTORS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT297 12.5 DECENTRALIZATION AS ENABLING AND CONSTRAINING FACTOR
300
12.6 REDEFINING FOREST TENURE SECURITY OF COMMUNITIES: LESSONS FROM LANGKAWANA
304
12.7 BEYOND LEGAliZATION OF COMMUNITY FOREST TENURE
306
12.8 THE END OF SOCIAL FOREST LICENSE, THE RISE OF POLffiCAL SECURITY IN LANGKAWANA
308
12.9 THE LIMIT OF SOCIAL FOREST LEGISLATION: LESSONS FROM CONFLICT-RIDDEN AREAS
309
12.10 CONCLUSION: SEEKING FOR A FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL REFORM OF FOREST TENURE
310
EPILOGUE
313
REFERENCES
321
SUMMARy
343
SAMENVATTING (SUMMARY IN DUTCH)
347
GLOSSARY
351
APPENDIX 1. LIST OF LEGISLATION
361
APPENDIX 2. LIST OF COURT DECISIONS
369
CURRICULUM VITAE
371
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES, MAPS, TABLES
FIGURE 2-1 TENURE SECURITY AND DYNAMICS: DOMAINS, FACTORS, ACTORS
35
FIGURE 3-1 INDONESIAN FOREST AREAS AND FORESTED LAND 1950-2008
42
FIGURE 3-2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL FOREST LEGISLATION
61
FIGURE 4-1 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FOREST AREAS IN INDONESIA
95
MAP 1-1 LAMPUNG PROVINCE
17
MAP 6-1 MARGA TERRITORIES IN LAMPUNG,
1930
145
MAP 7-1 LAMPUNG PROVINCE BY DISTRICTS/TOWNS, 2008
185
MAP 9-1 SOCIAL FOREST AREA IN LANGKAWANA, 1999
223
MAP 9-2 LAND PARCELS IN THE AREA OF FUG 1
229
TABLE 3-1 FOREST-COVERED AREAS AND ITS PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL LAND AREA OF JAVA AND MADURA 1840
-1940
40
TABLE 3-2 MAJOR COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT MODELS IN INDONESIA...... 63 TABLE 4-1 LICENSES OF FOREST UTILIZATION IN INDONESIA ACCORDING TO GR 6/2007.. 107 TABLE 5-1 SOCIAL FOREST LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA
134
TABLE 7-1 LAND USE IN LAMPUNG
172
TABLE 7-2 PROFILES OF DISTRICTS/TOWN AS CASE STUDIES
189
TABLE 8-1 LAND TENURE OF LANGKAWANA'S VILLAGERS IN THE FOREST AREA, TABLE 8-2 LAND TENURE IN NON-FOREST AREA IN LANGKAWANA,
2004 ... 197
2003
198
TABLE 9-1 MAJOR VEGETATION TYPES AND NUMBERS IN LANGKAWANAAGRO-FOREST GARDENS 1998 -2004 TABLE 9-2 VILLAGE ECONOMIC INDICATORS IN LANGKAWANA 1998 -2005
232 233
ABBREVIATIONS
AEP
Area for Exceptional Purpose (Kawasan dengan Tujuan Istimewa, see KdT!)
BAL
Basic Agrarian Law see UUPA
BPS
Badan Pusat Statistik (Central Agency of Statistics)
BPUPKI
Badan Penyelidik Usaha-usaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (The Committee for the Preparation of Indonesian Independence)
BRN
Biro Rekonstruksi Nasional (National Reconstruction Bureau), a government unit of providing sources of livelihood for ex-para military during Soekarno's administration
BT!
Barisan Tani Indonesia (Indonesian Peasants' Front), a wing organization of Indonesian Communist Party, see PKI
CF
Community Facilitator
CIFOR
Center for International Forestry Research
COP
Conference of the Parties
CSO
Civil Society Organization
CTL
Comite Tani Lampung (Committee of Lampung Farmers)
CTN
Corps Tjadangan Nasional (National Reserve Corps), a unit of military services during Soekarno's administration
DfID
United Kingdom Department for International Development
DNPI
Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim (The National Council on Climate Change)
DPD
Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (Regional Representative Council)
DPR
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (People's Representative Council)
DPRD
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (provincial and district/town councils)
DTL
Dewan Tani Lampung (Lampung Peasant Organization)
FAO
Food and Agricultural Organization
FMK
Forum Musyawarah Kelompok (Group Advisory Forum of Forest User Gorups)
FUG
Forest User Grup
FWI
Forest Watch Indonesia
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
GHG
Green House Gases
GKPPH
Gabungan Kelompok Pengelola dan Pelestari Hutan (The Association of Forest User Groups)
GOLKAR
Golongan Kanja (Functional Group), a rulling party during Suharto's administration
GR
Government Regulation
HGB
Hak Guna Bangunan (right to construct and possses building)
HGU
Hak Guna Usaha (right to commercial land utilization)
HKTI
Himpunan Kerukunan Tani Indonesia (The Association of Indonesian Farmer Organizations)
HPH
Hak Pengusahaan Hutan (Forest concesssion)
HPK
Hutan Produksi yang dapat Dikonversi (Convertible Production Forest)
HPT
Hutan Produksi Tetap (Permanent Production Forest)
HTR
Hutan Tanaman Rakyat (People's Plantation Forest)
IPHHBK
Izin Pemungutan Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu (License for harvesting of non-timber forest products)
IPHHK
Izin Pemungutan Hasil Hutan Kayu (License for harvesting of timber products)
IUPHHBK
Izin Usaha Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu (License for commercial utilization of non-timber products from natural and planted forests)
IUPHHK
Izin Usaha Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Kayu (License for commercial utilization of timber products from natural and planted forests)
IUPHHK Restorasi Ekosistem
Izin Usaha Pemanfaatan Hasil Hutan Kayu restorasi elwsistem (License for commercial utilization of timber products for the purpose of ecosystem restoration in natural forests)
IUPJL
Izin Usaha Pemanfaatan Jasa Lingkungan (License for commercial utilization of environmental services)
xviii
IUPK
Izin Usaha Pemanfaatan Kawasan Hutan (License for commercial utilization of Forest Area)
Kamvil
Kantor Wilayah (Regional Office of central government agencies)
KanwilBPN
Kantor Wilayah Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Regional Office of National Land Agency)
KdTI
Kawasan dengan Tujuan Istimewa (Area with Exceptional Purpose, see AEP)
KHDTK
Kawasan Hutan dengan Tujuan Khusus (Forest Area with Special Purpose)
KTP
Kartu Tanda Penduduk (Citizen identification card)
MPR
Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (People's Consultative Assembly)
NE!
Netherlands East-Indie
NGO
Non-Governmental Organization
NTFPs
Non-Timber Forest Products
P3AE-UI
Program Penelitian dan Pengembangan Antropologi Ekologi-Universitas Indonesia (Program for Research and Development of Ecological Anthropology at the University of Indonesia)
PAD
Pendapatan Asli Daerah (local revenue)
Perda
Peraturan Daerah (Regional Regulation)
PERPU
Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang (Government Regulation in lieu of Law)
PHBM
Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat (Perhutani-forest communities' join forestmanagemen~
PKI
Partai Komunis Indonesia (Indonesian Communist Party)
PMDH
Pembinaan Masyarakat Desa Hutan (Forest Villagers Development in logging concession areas)
PPF
People's Plantation Forest (see HTR)
PPKI
Panitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (the Committee on the Preparation of Indonesian Independence)
PRONA
Proyek Nasional Agraria (National Agrarian Project, national systematic land registration project)
xix
REDD
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries
REDD+
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradationand enhancing carbon stocks from the forest in Developing Countries
RePPProT
Regional Physical Planning Project for Transmigration
RRI
Rights and Resources Initiatives
RT
Rukun Tetangga (Neighborhood Association)
RW
Rukun Warga (Ward)
TAPMPR
Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (Decree of People's Consultative Assembly)
TAP MPRS
Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sementara (Decree of Provisional People's Consultative Assembly)
TGHK
Tata Guna Hutan Kesepakatan (Forest Land Use Agreement)
UNFCCC
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
UPTD
Unit Pelaksana Teknis Daerah (Regional technical operations unit)
UUDS 1950
Undang-undang Dasar Sementara 1950 (The 1950 Provisional Constitution)
UUPA
Undang-undang Pokok Agraria (Basic Agrarian Law, see BAL)
vac
Vereenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie (East India Company)
WRI
World Resources Institute
xx