School of Aerospace Engineering
Flame Thickness and Flame Speed Jerry Seitzman 0.2
2500
Mole Fraction
1500
CH4 H2O HCO x 1000 Temperature
0.1
1000
0.05
500
Temperature (K)
2000
0.15
Methane Flame 0
0 0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Distance (cm)
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -1 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
Flame Speed • Recall S Lo
2 f
1Y f ,1
RR chem
• Just a scaling law - not exact – example for HC/air STP reactants 5 4 2 • ~ 10 10 m s 4 3 • chem ~ 10 10 s (after reactants “preheated”) • S Lo ~ O0.01 1 m s
FlameThicknessSpeed -2 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
1
School of Aerospace Engineering
Flame Thickness • “Define” thickness of flame as T T2 Ti q preheat and reaction zones f ph R T1 • Estimate from preheat zone x R ph energy balance at interface T T dT 2 1 1S Lo c p Ti T1 f dx i T2 Turns gets 2 1 because he f f chem S Lo 1c p S Lo assumes PH=R 2 • Consider time scales 1 diff f f chem chem chem AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -3 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
Zeldovich Number • Compare preheat and reaction zone thicknesses T • Match heat flux at interface T i
– assume stepwise linear T profiles T1 T T T T i 1 2 i
ph R T2 R ph T2 Ti Ti T1 • What is (T2-Ti)? d RRT2 Ce E T2 Ti
a
RT2
dT
RRT2 1 Ea RT22 RRT2 Ea RT22
RRT2
ph
FlameThicknessSpeed -4
R
x
RRT2 RRTi T2 Ti
R RT22 Ea 1 Zeldovich # PH T2 T1 Ze
• Ze=O(10) for HC flames PH10R Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
0
T2
High Ea (and q) thin reaction zones
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
2
School of Aerospace Engineering
Physical/Chemical Effects on SLo, f o • Scaling laws for SLo, f S Lo RR 1 f S L • Predicts how premixed flame parameters will be influenced by changes in chemical and physical properties of the reactants
Chemical • Equiv. ratio () • Fuel type • Additives/diluents
• • • •
Physical Pressure Unburned temp. (T1) Burned temp. (T2) , D, cp AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -5 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
Scaling Models • Reaction rate • Diffusivity
RR A fuel, ox neE
a
1c p T1T m 1 pc p W m
FlameThicknessSpeed -6 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
Kinetic Theory
RT2
atoms triatomics
T W
m 0.5 0.8
p T1
cp cp W
m
1 W1
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
3
School of Aerospace Engineering
Pressure Dependence n2 1 n1 p p2 p p
S Lo RR 1 10
CH4/air
CH4/air =1 77F SL (ft/s)
• p>2 atm SoL~ p0.5 n~1 • p~0.1-0.5 atm SoL ~p0.25 n~1.5
n=1-1.5
1
1.41 p 0.5
1.15 p 0.25
0.1 0.1
1
10
100
Pressure (atm)
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -7 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
Pressure Dependence S p o L
n2 2
• Most hydrocarbons, n2 SoL as p • n based on global kinetics – can change with , p as important chemical steps change
• Propane 0.16 0.22 1 – S Lo S Lo,ref p pref • H2 – SoL as p for lean, SoL as p for rich FlameThicknessSpeed -8 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
4
School of Aerospace Engineering
Initial Temperature Dependence • From our model S Lo T1T m 2T2 n 2 e • However T2 also changes with T1 – though not too strongly – e.g., methane – T1 300600K T2 22302360K
Ea 2 RT2
m 0.5 0.8
2360K, 3790F
2230K, 3550F
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -9 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
Initial Temperature Dependence S Lo T11.5 2
• From HC experiments • Compare to model S Lo T1T m 2T2 n 2 e Ea 2 RT2 • Suggests T1 effect is mostly preheating
Dugger et al., Ind Engr. Chem. 47 (1955)
T11.5
– less preheating T11.9 required before reaction zone – not T2 effect, only 1.2 (see next slide) T 300600K gives 3.5-4 increase in S 1
FlameThicknessSpeed -10 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
L
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
5
School of Aerospace Engineering
Final Temperature Dependence • From models
S T o L
m2
n 2 2
T
e
Ea R 2T2
– typically dominated by expon. term
S e o L
SL T20.3e16,850K T
2
2230K 2360K
Ea R 2T2
Ea/R ~ 15-30103 K for HC fuels AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -11 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
Gas Properties • Nonchemical properties W , c p • From models o 1 SL
c pW m
m 0.5 0.8
• Light gases increase SoL (faster mean molecular speed, more diffusion) • Molar specific heat range limited Cold Atoms
1500K H2O
5 2 c p R 11 2
– also hard to change specific heat without changing adiabatic flame temperature FlameThicknessSpeed -12 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
6
School of Aerospace Engineering
Equivalence Ratio • H2-air – peaks quite rich (~ = 1.7-1.9)
• Adiabatic flame temperature (T2) • Also diffusion – molec. weight of H2
• Minor cp influence FlameThicknessSpeed -13 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
School of Aerospace Engineering
Equivalence Ratio • CH4-air –peaks slightly rich (~ = 1.1-1.2)
• For H-C fuels, primarily influence on adiabatic flame temperature (T2) • Reasonable match to model FlameThicknessSpeed -14 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
7
School of Aerospace Engineering
Fuel Type • By organic type
S
SoL(STP) cm/s
L , max
– Alkanes CC ~1.1 40-50 – Alkenes C=C ~1.2 50-70 – Alkynes CC ~1.4 60-160 – H2 ~1.7 280
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -15 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
Fuel Type • Primary influence of fuel type is adiabatic flame temperature change – SL dependence with fuel scales with Tad
ref: Turns, Fig. 8.17 FlameThicknessSpeed -16 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
8
School of Aerospace Engineering
Additives • Many fuel additives intended to change other fuel properties – small effect on SoL – – – –
reduce knock/preignition by raising ignition T increase lubricant properties of fuel reduce fuel line coking improve emissions
• If they influence reactions that control heat release or chain-branching steps, can change SoL – e.g., small amounts of H2O added to CO flames AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -17 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
Diluents • Class exercise – explain
“Air” = 21% O2 and 79% diluent FlameThicknessSpeed -18 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
after Clingman et al., Proc. Comb. Inst. 4 (1953)
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
9
School of Aerospace Engineering
Flame Thickness • Can show f p n 2
– Pressure – T2
f T e m2 2
f 1 c pW m
– cp,W –
Ea R 2T2
f minimum roughly at where SL maximum
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -19 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
1D Laminar Flame Structure • Recall assumed flame structure
unburned burned
T Ti q
T2
T1 preheat zone
reaction zone
x Discussion point: SL for Le1
FlameThicknessSpeed -20 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
10
School of Aerospace Engineering
H2 Flame Structure
ref: Glassman
• Calculations using Premix (Chemkin) – stoich. H2/air – 298K, 1 atm – “full” mechanism • O2 peaks as H2 drops H2 diffuses faster • Heat release widely distributed FlameThicknessSpeed -21 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
School of Aerospace Engineering
H2 Flame Structure
ref: Glassman
• Calculations using Premix (Chemkin) – stoich. H2/air – 298K, 1 atm – “full” mechanism • Peaks H production well into heat release zone • Diffusion of H upstream into reactants FlameThicknessSpeed -22 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
11
School of Aerospace Engineering
H2 Flame Structure • Calculations
H+O2 HO2
– H2/air =0.6 – 298K, 1 atm
HO2+H 2OH H2+OH H2O+H
Preheat/Diffusion Layer H Consumption H Production Layer Layer
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
FlameThicknessSpeed -23 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
School of Aerospace Engineering
CH4 Flame Structure
ref: Glassman
• Calculations using Premix (Chemkin) – stoich. CH4/air – 298K, 1 atm – “full” mechanism
Preheat FlameThicknessSpeed -24 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
Primary Heat Release
Slow Secondary Heat Release
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
12
School of Aerospace Engineering
CH4 Flame Structure
ref: Glassman
• Calculations using Premix (Chemkin) – stoich. CH4/air – 298K, 1 atm – “full” mechanism
H+O2 Fuel Final Burnout (CO) Conversion CH4+RCH3CH2O
FlameThicknessSpeed -25 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
School of Aerospace Engineering
Flame Structure • Most hydrogen/hydrocarbon flames have at least three discernible zones 1. a preheat/diffusion dominated zone • can include (low q ) reactions due to radical diffusion 2. a primary reaction zone • major radical/intermediate production, intense q 3. a final oxidation (burnout) zone • thicker than primary reaction zone • slow approach to final equilibrium • final heat release FlameThicknessSpeed -26 Copyright © 2004-2005, 2012 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved.
AE/ME 6766 Combustion
13