Fertility in high yielding dairy cows: to produce or to reproduce Geert Opsomer

Fertility in high yielding dairy cows: to produce or to reproduce Geert Opsomer Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health Faculty of Vete...
60 downloads 0 Views 8MB Size
Fertility in high yielding dairy cows: to produce or to reproduce Geert Opsomer Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Ghent University, Belgium

1

Aim of the presentation • To give an updated review on the most important points of interaction between the metabolic adaptations and reproductive function in the modern high yielding dairy cow

2

3

Calving interval in modern dairy herds • Overall: – at herd level most economical models illustrate that a short calving interval is beneficial – at individual cow level: it is probably not for all cows economically beneficial to invest in treatments to shorten the calving interval

• Currently, research is going on to find out: – in which situations an extension of the calving interval is justified – how an extension of the calving interval can be realized: nutritionally and genetically

5

6

100 80 60 40 20 0

10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 1951

1975

Conception rate

1985

1996

Milk production (kg/yr)

Conception rate (%)

Milk Production and Fertility in Dairy Cows

Milk Production 7 Butler et al., 1999

Melk productie / koe / jaar

Dairy cows in Belgium 1991 - 2007 10000

425

9000

420

8000

415

7000

410

6000

405

5000

400

4000

395

3000

390

2000

385

1000

380

0

375 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07

9

(Fricke, 2012)

10

High yielding dairy cow 60kg/day = ± 7 kg solids

11

12

Milk production - NEB GLUCOSE

insuline

LIPOLYSIS

LACTOSE

Melk

NEFA

gluconeogenesis

Ketolichamen

VETTEN

Alternatieve energie bron voor de perifere weefsels GLUCOSE sparen

BHB

13

Adaptation towards high milk yield: Glucosesparing state • • • •

Similar for most pregnant/lactating mammals Lower insulin concentration Lower insulin sensitivity Result: – Lower expression GLUT-4 in muscle, fat – More glucose available for insulin-independent organs • Mammary gland • Gravid uterus

14

- Insulin concentration ↓ - Insulin responsiveness ↓ Feed intake Liver Gluconeogenesis Brain GLUT4 Fat

NEFA

GLUT4

GLUCOSE 90%

GLUT1-3

Mammary gland (Bossaert, 2010)

• Downside of energy prioritization: – long and deep NEB is at the expense of body reserves and in some cases of health and production

16

Overconditioned cows • have a lower dry matter intake • larger fat depots to be broken down Hence are at a higher risk to suffer from: -metabolic diseases: ketosis, fatty liver, hypocalcemia -inflammatory/infectious diseases -fertility problems Fat cow syndrome (Morrow, 1975) 17

Fat cow syndrome

Metabolic syndrome

18

IR,  Insulin

Dyslipidemia

IGT, IFG

ED, Vessel

Increased CV Risk

Pro Thrombotic

Hypertension

Visceral obesity

Pro Inflammatory 19

Hormones secreted by the Adipocytes Leptin  Food intake  Energy expenditure  Lipolysis  lipogenesis  Insulin sensitivity

Resistin

+

Contradicting reports, possibly improvement of insulin sensitivity

+

+

Plasma glucose -> Mechanism ? ->  gluconeogenesis  FFA oxidation

TNF-  Food intake  Energy expenditure  Lipolysis  lipogenesis  Insulin sensitivity  GLUT-4  LPL

Adiponectin

+

+

ASP

+

 triglyceride synthesis via  DAG  GLUT-4  lipolysis via  HSL

IL-6  Food intake  Energy expenditure  Lipolysis  lipogenesis

Many others

20

About apples and pears

21

Omentum score 1: omentum is a rather thin peritoneal ‘mebrane’ with clearly visible blood vessels

22

(Van Eetvelde, 2009)

Omentum score 5: The omentum is that fat that there is no longer a ‘net structure’ is visible

23

(Van Eetvelde, 2009)

Correlation body condition score – omental score 6,00

5,00

Omentum score

4,00

r= 0,202 P=0,085

3,00

2,00

1,00

0,00 0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

24

Body condition score

(Van Eetvelde, 2009)

Nikkah

(Nikkah et al., 2010)

25

Fatty acids in dairy cows during NEB

26

(Hostens et al., in preparation)

Insulin Resistance and Obesity: Effects of Free Fatty Acids on Muscle

27

Hyperlipidemia causes insulin resistance in cows IVGTT 8 hours after infusion of tallow emulsion

(Pires et al., 28 2007)

Hyperlipidemia causes insulin resistance in cows IVITT 8 hours after infusion of tallow emulsion

(Pires et al., 29 2007)

Not all fatty acids and fat depots are the same • Fat depots: – visceral depots are considered more dangerous than subcutaneous depots • direct contact to the liver, higher possibility to produce adipokines, more sensitive for lipolysis, higher concentration of saturated fatty acids

• Nefas: – saturated fatty acids are proven to be more toxic than unsaturated fatty acids 30

Multiple Factors May Drive Progressive Decline of -Cell Function Hyperglycemia (glucose toxicity) Obesity Insulin resistance Protein glycation

-cell

“Lipotoxicity” (elevated FFA, TG)

Adapted from Unger RH, Orci L. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1585:202-212.

Dr.Sarma@works

Insulin (µU/mL)

IVGTT in periparturient dairy cows

-20

INS1 INS2 INS3 -10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

NEFA: negatively correlated with AUCins and Peakins

70

Time relative to infusion (min) AUCins

Peakins

600

20

500 15 400 300 200

*

*

10

*

*

5

100 0

0

- 14 d

+ 14 d

+ 42 d

- 14 d

+ 14 d

+ 42 d

(Bossaert, 2010)

33 (Opsomer et al., 1999)

(Vanholder, 2005)

34

(Vanholder, 2005)

35

(Vanholder, 2006)

Conclusion • Lactation: depression of insulin secretion • NEFA inversely related to AUCins (P < 0,001) • Intense lipolysis  “downward spiral”

Pancreas

– NEFA suppresses insulin secretion – Low insulin increases lipolysis 36

(Bossaert, 2010)

Main consequences of metabolic adaptations • compromised immunity – pro-inflammatory state • lower peripheral levels of glucose, insulin, IGF-1 • higher peripheral levels of Nefa, β-OH butyrate • very high metabolization rate in the liver 37

Liver as central organ

Daily hepatic blood flow for a 40 liter cow:

50.000 liters

39

Fertility dairy cows The Netherlands Year

ICI

NR 56

No insem/preg

Interval p-1st insem

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

393 397 398 400 401 403 405 408 417 413

67 66 67 68 67 68 68 69 68 68

1.79 1.83 1.82 1.80 1.83 1.81 1.81 1.78 1.80 1.78

85 85 86 89 89 91 95 100 103 102 40

Results of studies based on prog analysis

• 448 Normal cyclical patterns (%) • 78 • 7 Delayed cyclicity (%) • 3 Temp cessation of cyclicity • 3 Prolonged luteal phase (%) • 4 Short cycles • 4 Other irregular patterns

• No. of lactations •

• • • • •

Traditional Modern high herds yielding herds

463 51 21,5 4 21,5 0,5 1,5

Fagan and Roche Opsomer et al. 41 1986 1998

42

Delayed cyclicity: consistently low progesterone concentrations for at least 50 days after calving progesterone ng/ml milkfat

120 105 90 75 60 45

AI pregnant

30 15 0 0

7

14

21

28

35

42

49

56

63

70

77

84

91

98

105

112

119

126

133

140

days post partum 43

Risk factor analysis

Delayed cyclicity: • clinical signs of negative energy balance • health problems

(Opsomer et al., 2000) 44

45

(Butler, 1989)

46

Resumption of ovarian activity after calving Brain

LH

FSH Estradiol

OVARY

> 20%!

METABOLISM

Main factors for ovarian resumption after calving • Peripheral levels of insulin and IGF-1: – both have a direct effect on follicular growth and maturation – both facilitate the work of FSH and LH

• Lower insulin levels: – associated with cystic ovaries (Vanholder, 2005)

• Lower IGF-1 levels: – generally associated with lower fertility (Wathes, RVC)

Effects of negative energy balance Metabolic ‘messengers’

GnRH hypothalamus

pituitary gland (hypofysis)

FSH LH Metabolic ‘messengers’ -Glucose -Ketobodies -Nefa's -Urea

ovary

LH surge Ovulation 49

Transvaginal follicular fluid aspiration

50

51

B-hydroxybutyrate (mM)

β-hydroxybutyrate 2,5 2

serum

1,5

follicular fluid

1 0,5 0 -7

0

11

14

20

26

33

40

46

days to partus (Leroy et al., 2004)

52

NEFA

NEFA (mM)

0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3

serum

0,2

follicular fluid

0,1 0 -7

0

11

14

20

26

33

40

46

days to partus 53

(Leroy et al., 2004)

% 35 30 25 20

serum

15 10

follicular fluid

5 0

oleic acid (C18:1)

Stearic Palmitic Linoleic acid acid acid (C18:0) (C16:0) (C18:2) 54

(Leroy , 2005)

In vitro effect of elevated NEFA levels on proliferation of granulosa cells

48 hr

with palmitic, stearic and/or oleic acid

• fatty acids like palmitic and stearic acid have a significant negative effect on granulosa cell growth and proliferation (Vanholder, 2005) 55

Heat expression (Lopez et al.) >39,5 kg/day n Duration (h) # standing

120 -