Factors Affecting Pregnancy Rates in IVF

Factors Affecting Pregnancy Rates in IVF Russian Association of Human Reproductive Health St. Petersburg. September 9, 2011 G. David Adamson, MD,FRCSC...
Author: Verity Johns
9 downloads 2 Views 2MB Size
Factors Affecting Pregnancy Rates in IVF Russian Association of Human Reproductive Health St. Petersburg. September 9, 2011 G. David Adamson, MD,FRCSC,FACOG,FACS Director, Fertility Physicians of Northern California Adjunct Clinical Professor, Stanford University Associate Clinical Professor, UCSF

Disclosures • Advanced Reproductive Care (ARC) – Founder and CEO

• Professional Organizations – – – – –

ASRM: Past President FIGO: Chair, Reproductive Medicine Committee ICMART: Int’l Committee Monitoring ART IFFS: Executive Committee WERF: Chair

• Funded Research Studies – – – –

EMD Merck Serono IBSA LabCorp Schering Plough

What is “Success”???????? • Patients – “This glossary does not include specific measures of “success” which would take into consideration the well-being of babies as well as of their mothers, fathers, surrogates and/or gamete donors.” (1)

• Other Society Stakeholders – Appropriate cost to broader society – Minimized social or ethical issues – Appropriate number of babies for that society

• A healthy singleton baby 1. ICMART WHO Glossary 2009. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1520–4.

Patient Selection For IVF

Informed Consent and Guidelines For Care* • • • •

Evidence based medicine Effective consulting and counseling Informed consent guidelines Guidelines for providing infertility services • Practice guidelines • Ethical guidelines * Significant influence on patient’s decision

Major Categories of Factors That Affect IVF Success • • • • •

Patient population Quality of medical treatment Quality of gamete/embryology laboratory Measurement & reporting of outcomes Resources available for treatment – Financial – Patient support services

• Values and ethics – – – –

Patients Physicians Community Society

Patient Population

Pregnancy Rates Following Treatment (Per Cycle) IVF NATIONAL RATES

PER CYCLE

LIVE BIRTHS PER TRANSFER FOR ART CYCLES USING FRESH EMBRYOS FROM OWN AND DONOR EGGS, BY PATIENT AGE NATIONAL DATA CDC 2004 70 60

Percent

50 40 30 20 10 0 Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Patient age Ow n eggs

Donor eggs

Individual Patient “Egg” Factors Affecting IVF Live Birth Rates • Age • Ovarian reserve – FSH/E2 – Antral follicle count – ?Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH)

• • • • • • •

Egg donation (increase) Recurrent pregnancy loss Smoking (1) Alcohol & other drugs Increased Body Mass Index (BMI) Excessive exercise ? Caffeine 1. ASRM Practice Cmttee. Fertil Steril Nov 2008;90(Suppl 3):S254-9)

Individual Patient Pelvic Factors Affecting IVF Live Birth Rates • Hydrosalpinges (decrease 50%) • Myomas (if cavity distortion decrease) Endometriomas (?) • Adenomyosis (?) • Congenital uterine abnormalities • Cervical “incompetence” • Intrauterine adhesions • Thin endometrium (< 8 mm)

ASRM Practice Committee. Fertil Steril Nov 2008;90(Suppl 3):S66-7.

Normal Uterus and Endometrium

Uterine Factors and Age-Related Infertility • Polyps increase with age (1) • Myomas increase with age (2,3) • No significant age-related decline in delivery rates with egg donation 1. Nagele F. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88:900 2. Baird et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:100-7. 3. Peddada et al. PNAS 2008 Dec 16;105(50):19887-92.

Submucous Myoma

Meta-analysis of Myoma Studies •

Fertility outcomes – decreased in women with submucosal fibroids – removal seems to confer benefit



Intramural fibroids – appear to decrease fertility – results of therapy are unclear



More high-quality studies need to be directed toward the value of myomectomy for intramural fibroids, focusing – size – number – proximity to the endometrium Pritts. Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr; 91(4):1215-23. Epub 2008 Mar 12.

Effects Of Male Age On Fertility • Many studies confounded by age of female partner • In studies controlling for female age, MEN age > 50 create pregnancies at a rate 23-38% lower than MEN age 38 20%

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Silberstein. Fertil Steril 2005;84(4):1043-5.

Quality of Laboratory

FPNC Gamete Laboratory

Key Steps in IVF Fertilization

• Conventional Insemination

• Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)

What Can Urologists Do For Severe Male Factor Infertility? • Genetic testing: – Karyotype (chromosome ‘spread’) – Y chromosome testing – Cystic fibrosis gene testing (obstructive cases only)

• Sperm harvesting: – Often utilizes microsurgical techniques – Can be done with minimal disruption of the genitals – Sources of sperm: epididymal vs. testicular • Advantages and disadvantages of each

Key Steps in IVF Embryo Development

Day 1

Day 3

Day 6

•Embryology laboratory quality •Useful: PGD for single genes, balanced translocations •HARMFUL: PGS embryo biopsy on Day 3 or day 5

Cryopreservation (Day 1, Day 3 or Day 5) Jane Doe, dd/mm/yy 999-99-9999

• “Good quality” embryos which are not transferred can be frozen for future use • Embryos stored in special straws labeled with patient’s name and unique identifier • Straws containing embryos are submerged in liquid nitrogen storage environment • Vitrification better than slow freezing • Replace thawed embryos – Natural cycle – Medicated cycle

Outcomes Assessment

Outcomes Assessment • Difficulty in measurement • SART/CDC clinic-specific report – definition of success – calculation of FET cycle pregnancies in addition to fresh transfers – random variation of results1 – variation of patient populations – variation in patient selection 1

Chapko, Adamson. Fertil Steril1995;64(4):757-63.

Complications of ART in 3,500 Cycles (Cairo, Egypt) • • • • • • • • •

OHSS moderate 206 OHSS severe 60 Vaginal bleeding 3 Deep vein thrombosis 4 Hemiparesis 2 Pelvic infection 10 Acute abdomen 3 Anesthetic complication 2 Mortality* (Hep C, OHSS)1 TOTAL 291

5.9% 1.7% 0.09% 0.1% 0.06% 0.3% 0.09% 0.06% 0.03% 8.3%

.

Serour. Fertil Steril 1998;70(4):638-42

Elective Single Embryo Transfer (eSET): An American Perspective • Decrease in number of embryos transferred from two to one – Reasonable option in one-third of patients – Reduces twin incidence to half its original – No decline in ongoing pregnancy rate overall

• The proportion of patients for whom this is appropriate will vary from program to program, depending on individual patient characteristics. • Implement the program gradually – Distinct clinical phases – Judicious patient selection



Cryopreservation

Patient Resources

Patient Drop-out Rates Are 37 – 68%: What is Impact on Cumulative eSET? • A major unknown confounding variable on the overall success of eSET (1,2) – Cost – Physician-recommended – 65% not pregnant did not pursue covered treatment in Sweden (3) • • • • • •

Psychological –26% Poor Prognosis – 25% Spontaneous pregnancy – 19% Physical burden – 6% Serious disease – 2% Other –7% (1) Fertil Steril 2004;81:258-78. (2) Daya. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1135-43. (3) Olivius. Fertil Steril 2002;77:505-10.

Complements to Fertility Treatments • Mind-Body 10-Week Fertility Program – Relieve emotional and physical distress and increase chances of conception – Taught by licensed therapists • 10 session program • Weekend program • One day program

• Mind-Body Resources Local resources for alternative and complementary medicine

– – – –

Counseling Nutrition Acupuncture* Yoga*

* NO proven benefit, but may help individuals cope

Values and Ethics

The Hierarchy of Interest

Patients Gametic Material Future Children Physicians and Embryologists ART Professional Organizations (SART, ASRM, RESOLVE, Nurses) Regulatory Agencies (CDC, NIH, FTC, FDA, Gov’t.) Other Interested Parties (Industry, ABA, Payers, Society) Adamson. Am Bar Assoc Family Law Fall 2005; 39(3); 727-44.

The Future

“Near Future” Factors That Might Affect IVF Success Rates • Increased Access – Increased societal support – Increased healthcare coverage

• Better Patient Selection – Increased clinical knowledge • International factors affecting outcomes • Individual patient characteristics • Cross border reproductive care

– Increased scientific knowledge

“Near Future” Factors That Might Affect IVF Success Rates • Clinical Care Improvements – Increased knowledge regarding • Endometriosis management pre-IVF – Endometriomas – Duration of ovarian suppression

• Myomas

– Improved ovarian stimulation protocols • More effective: more higher quality eggs • Safer: lower incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation • Lower cost

– Long-acting gonadotropins • Decreased monitoring and cost • ? Increased safety

• Lower multiple pregnancy rates • Increased Single Embryo Transfer (SET)

“Near Future” Factors That Might Affect IVF Success Rates • Embryology Laboratory Improvements – More automated, standardized, robust culture systems – Improved cryopreservation • Slow freezing • Vitrification

– ? In vitro maturation (IVM)

• Better embryo selection – CGH for genetic selection – Metabolomics, proteomics – Other technologies

“Far Future” Factors That Might Affect IVF Success Rates • Better embryo selection – Choose best embryo – SET in majority of patients

• Oral gonadotropins • More efficient utilization of cryopreserved embryos • Genetics – Diagnosis of selected genes associated with causes of infertility – Treatment of selected genes associated with causes of infertility – Prevention of genetically identifiable causes of infertility

“Far Future” Factors That Might Affect IVF Success Rates • Societal recognition of IVF as a disease • Societal financial support of infertility services, including IVF • Widespread application of “affordable ART” in low resource environments • Complete integration of reproductive medicine treatment into comprehensive women’s health prevention and treatment programs

CONCLUSION: Factors That Affect IVF Success • Define Success: Healthy singleton baby • Infertility is a complex disease – – – – – –

2 patients plus child(ren) Many causes Some treatments simple, many complex Multiple treatments simultaneously Significant scientific and technological advances Both known and unknown factors affect success

• Known factors affecting success – – – – – –

Types of patients Quality of care Quality of laboratory Complexity and interpretation of outcome assessment Socioeconomic factors Patient and physician values and ethics

• Future developments expected and exciting

Thank You!