Evidence based primary prevention The Icelandic Model Gothenburg │Förebygg.nu November 2013
Jón Sigfússon ©ICSRA / Reykjavik University 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
What if these were corporate results? 50 45
42
40
35
35
32
33
30 %
25
26
10 5 0
26
23
25
22 19
20 15
28
16 17
18 15
14
14
15 12
11
12
12
11
12
19
14
10 10
13 9
9
9 7
6
7 6 5 3
9
7 3
5 2
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
What if these were corporate results? 50 45
42
40
35
35
32
33
30 %
25
26
10 5 0
26
23
25
22 19
20 15
28
16 17
18 15
14
14
15 12
11
12
12
11
12
19
14
10 10
13 9
9
9 7
6
7 6 5 3
9
7 3
5 2
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Substance use decrease amongst 15-16 year old adolescents
%
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Drunk last 30 days
42 35
Daily smoking
32
33 26
23 19 17
15
28
Hashish once or more
26 22
16 12
25 18
15 11
14
12
14 12 13 9
11 9
12 9
10 7
19 10 6
14 9 7 6 3
7 3
5 3
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
How has this been achieved? • Research as a basis for policy and actions on the local and national level • An evidence based bottom up approach – not top down
• Prevention work has been focused on risk and protective factors in the lives of youth • Managed to keep a constant dialogue between all those who are responsible for prevention in the close community of the children 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Structure of presentation 1. The role of research in prevention work 2. Background of the prevention model 3. Methodology, characteristics and emphasis 4. Actions in regard to primary prevention
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The role of research 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
ICSRA background • A governmental Youth Research Institution
from 1992 focusing on education and upbringing of youth • ICSRA established 1998 with a broad focus on all aspects of youth research
• Lead Youth Research Institution since 1998
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
ICSRA specialization • 10 to 13 year old in Primary school: •
2000-2013 – Bi-annually (Prognostic factors)
• 14 to 16 year old in Primary school: •
1992-2013 – Annually (Status and development)
• 16 to 20 year old in High school/Junior college: •
1992-2013 – Every third year
• Dropout students 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Indicators Health status indicators, anxiety, depressive symptoms, physical health status, lifestyle and leisure time activities, local community networks,
negative life events and strain, parents and family, peer group economic and psychological issues,
studies and school, substance use, values and attitudes, violence and delinquency, and more…
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The twofold use of research 1. Scientific 2. Practical
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The scientific role of research 1.
In depth analysis of the data
2.
50 peer reviewed papers past 5 years
3.
Publications in journals in Europe and USA
4.
Science forms the platform for practice
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Collaborators • Karolinska Institutet, Sweden • Kings College, London • University of Ireland, Galway • Reykjavik University • University of California, Irvine • Columbia University, NY • University of Iceland • Penn State University 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The practical role of research 1.
Population data collection on substance use
every year (no samples, always population). 2.
Practical descriptive reports within 2-3 months of
each data collection to the municipalities 3.
School reports to the schools
4.
Local information INTO all levels of prevention work is a key issue 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Importance of frequent measuring • Every school, every parent, every prevention worker can see the current situation in their close community and can act accordingly. •
Not 2-3 years later but almost immediately
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Childrens rights •
Children have the right to have a say about what they want, what they do and how they feel.
•
We have the obligation to make good use of what they tell us, react and constantly try to make their lives better.
•
People agree on this today 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Prevention approach Background 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
In the year 1992 • Governmental decision to start collecting
data from 15-16 year old students. •
Aim: To see if and how information collected could benefit policymaking and decisions for actions in youth matters in general.
• Several data collections until 1998
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Upward trend 1992 – 1998 30 Have tried hashish
Smoke daily
25
22,8 20,7
20 17,4 % 15
15,1
10 9,6 5
7,2
0 1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
1998 • At this point of time research already showed
us that certain circumstances and behavior in the lives of adolescents was strongly connected with use. • We tried to establish the risk and protective factors.
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The four main risk and protective factors Family factors
Extracurricular activities, sports
Peer group effect
General well being
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
And analyzing deeper
Family factors
Organized activities vs. unorganized Extracurricular activities
Time spent with parents Support Monitoring Control
Peer group
Positive and negative effects. How we as parents approach the peer group Staying outside late
General well being Inside and outside of school, at home, bullying e.t.c.
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
1998 Drug-free Iceland • Based on these findings a research based action plan was initiated by the government with the aim to try out a totally new methodology in substance use prevention. • Obviously, what had been done before, was not
working.
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Organizations promoting drug free areas in 2013 • Common phrases in declarations/mission statements: •
Fight against drugs, Attack or Combat drugs
•
Intensify police measures, Offensive actions against drugs, School action plans against drugs
•
… and a lot of handshakes and resolutions …
• Very little on evidence-based work, role of parents, addressing risk factors in the close community and
informal social control 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Aim of Drug free Iceland • To change the actual behavior of youth and
not only their attitudes
• Change the life-style environment of our children so that they would be in lesser risk of substance use
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The methodology 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Our focus is primary prevention •Primary prevention, preventing the development of
substance use before it starts
•Secondary prevention, that refers to measures that detect substance use
•Tertiary prevention efforts that focus on people already abusing substances 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Substance use follows cohorts Sigfusdottir et al. 2011, Global Health Promotion
Lifetime drunkenness
57
60 50 40 % 30
41
41 32 20
25
22
20 10 0
10
8 6
13
14
14
16 15
Cohort 1984
4 1 13
21
12
11 6 14
15
Cohort 1991 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Substance use follows cohorts Sigfusdottir et al. 2011, Global Health Promotion
Lifetime drunkenness
60
57
50
40
41
40 % 30 20
25 20 10
10
0 13
14
15
Cohort 1984
13
14
15
Cohort 1991 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
What else could we tell the policymakers? 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of girls in 9th and 10th grade who have become drunk in the last 30 days depending on how much time they spend with parents 100 90
Almost never
Seldom
Sometimes
Often
Almost always
80 70 60
% 50
42,0
40 30
20
27,8
17,6 12,0
10,4
10 0
Girls who have become drunk last 30 days 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of students in 9th and 10th grade who have become drunk in the last 30 days depending on if their friends become drunk once pr. month.
100
None or few
A few
Many
Almost all
90
80 68,2
70 60
49,3
% 50 40
30
23,3
20 10
4,6
0 Boys who have become drunk past 30 days 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of students in 9th and 10th grade who smoke daily depending on if they practice sports
50 Almost never
Up to 3 times pr. week
4 times or more often
40
30
24,9
%
20 12,5
10
10,4
9,9 4,0
3,5
0 Boys who smoke daily
Girls who smoke daily
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Main actions Based on the research findings 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Local actions – examples: • Research as a basis in policymaking and actions
• Strengthen parent organizations and cooperation • Support extra – curricular activities / sports
• Support active NGOs´ • Support Young people at risk inside schools • Form co-operative work groups against drugs • Anti smoking/drinking campains • Strengthen social capital
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
National actions – examples: • Legal age of adulthood raised from 16 to 18 years • Age limits to buy tobacco and alcohol (18 and 20) • Strict regulations for sellers of tobacco • A total advertising ban of tobacco and alcohol • Restricted access to buying alcohol and tobacco • Total visibility ban of tobacco and alcohol • Rules on outside hours for adolecents 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Visibility ban of tobacco
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Outside hours reminder
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Rules on outside hours • Why? Risk factor to “hang out” late with peers • Addressed to parents to encourage sleep of children • Stickers on every refrigerator • Under 12 year old 20:00 from 1st of May to 1st of September (summer) and until 22 in winter.
• 13 to 16 year old until midnight in summer and 22:00 in winter.
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The scientific isolation needed to be broken 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The researchers “guru“ approach
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
We needed to focus on close community • How could an average figure on alcohol use in
Sweden help prevention workers in Gothenburg? • “Average” is the biggest liar!
• Population research / yearly •
Reports to 80% of municipalities
•
School reports to 70% of schools
• Local information within 2-3 months of data collection each year 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
School
10
Average
20
5,2 5,8 6,6 7,9 8,5 8,8 8,9 9,1 9,2 10,6 11,9 12,0 12,5 12,5 12,6 12,8 12,8 13,2 14,3 14,9 15,5 15,6 16,9 17,1 18,6 19,8 20,9 21,0 23,1 25,5 27,0
31,4
% 30
School
2,3
Local figures for smoking in 33 gymnasiums (16-19)
Every school can see where students stand. 50
40
0
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Local information fuels dialogue •
Dialogue between key stakeholders •
Politicians, municipalities and local authorities
•
Parental groups and family planners
•
School authorities and school workers
•
Health educators, health and social services
•
Leisure time workers, prevention workers
•
Sports and youth institutions
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The way we work now
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Knowing is not enough. How do you act? 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
One practical example 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The Reykjavik City Leisure Card The Leisure Card initiative is to guarantee that all
children up to the age of 18 have the opportunity to engage in leisure activities outside school. The City of Reykjavik allocates approximately EUR 3.000.000-, yearly to the Leisure Card Influencing parents first and foremost 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Twofold goal
1. Humanitarian goal • Less substance use
2. Financial goal • Return on investment is multiple 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
And what is achieved? 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of students in 9th grade that participate in sports in a sports club four times per week or more
50 45
Increased organized sports participation 42,0
40
34,0
35 30 % 25
23,0
20
15 10
5 0
2000
2006
2012
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of students in 9th and 10th grade who spend time (often/almost always) with their parents during weekdays 50 45
Time spent with parents
40
46,0
33,0
35 30
% 25
23,0
20 15 10 5 0 1997
2006
2012
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Proportion of students in 9th and 10th grade who have been out after 10 pm (3 times or more) in the past week 75
Less late outside hours
65 55
53,0 40,0
45
% 35
29,0
25 15 5 -5
2000
2006
2012
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
My parents know where I am in the evenings (applies very or rather well to me) 9th and 10th grade 80 70 60
Increased parental monitoring
67,0
71,0
2006
2012
52,0
50 %
40 30 20 10 0 2000
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
And substance use is going down 50
45
Drunk last 30 days
42
Daily smoking
40
35
35
32
33 26
30 %
25
10 5
0
28
26
23
17
25
22 19
20 15
Hashish once or more
16
18
15
14
14
15 12
11
12
12
11
12
19 14
10 10
13
9
9
9 7
6
7 6
9 3
7 3
5 32
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
What about evaluation? 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Kristjansson et al. 2010, Preventive Medicine
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
To conclude 2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
ADPY
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Youth in Europe starts 2005 50 45
Drunk last 30 days
42
40
35
35
32
15 10 5
26
23 19
20 17
15
Hashish once or more
33
30 % 25
Daily smoking
28
Substance use down by 50% in 8 years
26 22
16 12
15
14
14
11
12
13
12
11
9
9
0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
15 – 16 year old who have become drunk past 30 days in some European cities 2013 50
45 40 35 % 30
28,0 24,2
25
19,2
20 15,3 15
12,2 8,6
10 5,4 5 0
9,8
10,3
16,1
16,8
19,7
24,2
15 – 16 year old who have become drunk past 30 days in Reykjavik 2013 and 1998 50 45
42,0
40
35 % 30
28,0
25
23,0 19,2
20 15,3 15 8,6
10
9,8
10,3
16,1
24,2
19,7
16,8
12,2
5,4 5
0 RVK 2013
RVK 1998
What is the commitment?
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Thank you Gothenburg│November 2013
2013 ICSRA │Reykjavik University