Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer

CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364 Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer Eduardo C. Lazcano-Ponce, MD, PhD; J. F. Miquel, MD; Nubi...
Author: Kerrie Austin
1 downloads 2 Views 330KB Size
CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer Eduardo C. Lazcano-Ponce, MD, PhD; J. F. Miquel, MD; Nubia Muñoz, MD; Rolando Herrero, MD, PhD; Catterina Ferrecio, MD; Ignacio I.Wistuba, MD; Patricia Alonso de Ruiz, MD; Gerardo Aristi Urista, MD; Flavio Nervi, MD

ABSTRACT Gallbladder cancer is usually associated with gallstone disease, late diagnosis, unsatisfactory treatment, and poor prognosis. We report here the worldwide geographical distribution of gallbladder cancer, review the main etiologic hypotheses, and provide some comments on perspectives for prevention. The highest incidence rate of gallbladder cancer is found among populations of the Andean area, North American Indians, and Mexican Americans. Gallbladder cancer is up to three times higher among women than men in all populations. The highest incidence rates in Europe are found in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. Incidence rates in other regions of the world are relatively low. The highest mortality rates are also reported from South America, 3.5-15.5 per 100,000 among Chilean Mapuche Indians, Bolivians, and Chilean Hispanics. Intermediate rates, 3.7 to 9.1 per 100,000, are reported from Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, and Brazil. Mortality rates are low in North America, with the exception of high rates among American Indians in New Mexico (11.3 per 100,000) and among Mexican Americans. The main associated risk factors identified so far include cholelithiasis (especially untreated chronic symptomatic gallstones), obesity, reproductive factors, chronic infections of the gallbladder, and environmental exposure to specific chemicals. These suspected factors likely represent promoters of carcinogenesis. The main limitations of epidemiologic studies on gallbladder cancer are the small sample sizes and specific problems in quantifying exposure to putative risk factors. The natural history of gallbladder disease should be characterized to support the allocation of more resources for early treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease in high-risk populations. Secondary prevention of gallbladder cancer could be effective if supported by cost-effective studies of prophylactic cholecystectomy among asymptomatic gallstone patients in high-risk areas.

INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder cancer was first described in 1777.1 More than 200 years later, late diagnosis and absence of effective treatment for many patients remain typical features of this disease.1,2 The prognosis is poor—only about a 32 percent five-year survival rate for lesions confined to the gallbladder mucosa and a 10 percent oneyear survival rate for more advanced stages.3-6 The highest frequency of the disease is found among females over the age of 65.7 There is a marked regional and ethnic

Dr. Lazcano-Ponce is Director, Epidemiology Department, Population Health Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. Dr. Miquel is Associate Professor, Gastroenterology Department, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. Dr. Muñoz is Consultant, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. Dr. Herrero is Consultant, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, and Costa Rica Cancer Institute, San José, Costa Rica. Dr. Ferrecio is Assistant Professor, Public Health Department, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. Dr. Wistuba is Associate Professor, Pathology Department, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. Dr. Alonso de Ruiz is Head of Cytopathology Laboratory, Autonomous National University of Mexico, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, DF. Dr. Aristi Urista is Assistant Professor, Cytopathology Laboratory, Autonomous National University of Mexico, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, DF. Dr. Nervi is Professor Titular, Gastroenterology, Public Health and Pathology Departments, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. Original studies performed in Chile and referenced herein were supported by a grant from Elliot Marcus, and institutional grants number 1000739 from the Fondo Nacional Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT), and 1091/G224/ICU/CHILE from the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This study was partially funded by the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology and the Mexican National Institute of Public Health. The preparation of this manuscript was undertaken during the period when Dr. Eduardo LazcanoPonce was a visiting scientist at the International Agency for Research on Cancer in Lyon, France. This article is also available at www.cancer.org.

Volume 51 • Number 6 • November/December 2001

349

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer

variation in the incidence of gallbladder cancer. The highest mortality rates have been reported among Chilean Mapuche Indians and Hispanics,8,9 among Bolivians,10 North American Indians,11 and Mexican Americans.12 Incidence rates are much lower in Europe13 and India.14 There is a clear worldwide association between chronic cholelithiasis and gallbladder cancer. Aside from gallstones and female gender, a number of associated risk factors appear to favor the development of gallbladder cancer either as neoplastic initiators, such as unknown endo- and exobiotic mutagens, or as neoplastic promoters, including chronic inflammation and infection. Among the latter factors, a link has been specifically proposed between chronic bacterial infection of the gallbladder with Salmonella typhi. In this review, we analyze the worldwide geographical distribution of gallbladder cancer and the main etiologic hypotheses. We also provide comments on molecular pathology, associated risk factors, and potential for prevention— particularly in high-risk populations.

DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY Source of Data for the Estimation of Incidence Rates

Specific age-adjusted incidence rates (standardized for the world population) were obtained from some countries from Volume VII of Cancer Incidence in Five Continents15 and from selected reports where pertinent. According to the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9),16 cancers of the biliary tract include tumors of the gallbladder (156.0), extrahepatic bile ducts (156.1), the ampulla of Vater (156.2), other and biliary tract, part unspecified (156.8-9). There is little geographical variation in the incidence of tumors of the extrahepatic bile ducts and the

350

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

ampulla of Vater. Greater geographical variation is observed for gallbladder cancer and for other tumors as well as biliary tract cancer not otherwise specified (NOS), which are classified together. In autopsy studies throughout the world, gallbladder cancer represents 80 to 95 percent of cancers of the biliary tree.We combine rates for tumors of the biliary tract NOS (156.8156.9) with those of gallbladder cancer (156.0), since it is likely that a significant fraction of NOS cases were indeed gallbladder cancer. The cancer registries fulfilling the following criteria were included in the present review: 1) availability of incidence rates in the period under study (1988 to 1992); 2) a minimum of 10 cases reported; and 3) representation of the highest rates for a given country. The selected registries as were listed in rank order for gallbladder cancer in various regions of the world based on the incidence among females. A total of approximately 30 areas from five continents were assessed. Unpublished data provided by the Cancer Registries in La Paz, Bolivia, and Asuncion, Paraguay were included with the permission of the corresponding registries, as were data published from Northern India.14 There were no incidence rates of gallbladder cancer registered in Chile— the country with the highest mortality rate of gallbladder cancer in the world.8,9 Pooled agespecific incidence rates for Latin America were calculated using data from six cancer registries: Trujillo, Peru; Quito, Ecuador; Cali, Colombia; Porto Alegre, Brazil; Costa Rica; and Montevideo, Uruguay. Data from 10 registries from the SEER program in the US and from 12 Canadian Registries included in Volume VII of Cancer Incidence in Five Continents were included for North America.15 There is substantial geographic variability of gallbladder cancer incidence as shown in Figure 1. The rates for gallbladder cancer are higher among women than men in all

CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364

FIGURE 1 Age-Standardized Incidence Rates of Gallbladder Cancer per 100,000 (World Population) for Selected Areas Worldwide, 1988–1992 Females

Males La Paz, Bolivia1 US, New Mexico, American Indians Setif, Algeria Trujillo, Peru Quito, Ecuador Cali, Colombia Kracow, Poland Porto Alegre, Brazil North India2 Czech Republic Slovakia Latina, Italy Nagasaki, Japan Costa Rica Granada, Spain Canada, Northwest Territories Asuncion, Paraguay1 Montevideo, Uruguay US, Central California, Hispanics Sweden Haut Rhin, France Graubunden, Switzerland Croatia Shanghai, China South Australia Israel, All Jews Canada US SEER, Whites US SEER, Blacks UK (England, Wales)

20

15

10

5

0

Rate per 100,000

0

5

10

15

20

Rate per 100,000

Source: Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, and Young J. Eds. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol VII (IARC Scientific Publications No. 143) Lyon, IARC, 1997. 1 Unpublished data from La Paz, Bolivia and Asuncion, Paraguay are shown with permission of the corresponding registries. 2 Dhir V, Mohandas KM. Epidemiology of Digestive Tract Cancers in India IV. Gall bladder and pancreas. Indian J Gastroenterol 1999;18(1):24-28.

populations included in the analysis. The rates are highest in women from La Paz, Bolivia (15.5 per 100,000). Intermediate rates (from 3.7 to 9.1 per 100,000) are reported in Trujillo, Peru; Quito, Ecuador; Cali, Colombia; Porto Alegre, Brazil; Asuncion, Paraguay; and Montevideo, Uruguay. In North America, low rates predominate, with the exception of high rates reported among Indians in New Mexico (11.3 per 100,000) and intermediate rates among female immigrants from Latin America. In Europe, the highest incidence is found in

the countries of Eastern Europe: Poland (Kracow), the Czech Republic, and Slovakia.13 Likewise, population-based data indicate that the incidence of gallbladder cancer is relatively high in northern Indian cities14 (Uttar, Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa,West Bengal, and Assam). Except for some high-risk areas such as Nagasaki, Japan, the rates in other regions of the world are relatively low. In males, the highest incidence rates of gallbladder cancer are reported from La Paz, Bolivia (7.5 per 100,000) and Quito, Ecuador

Volume 51 • Number 6 • November/December 2001

351

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer

(4.1 per 100,000). The highest female/male ratios (≥ 3) were seen in Porto Alegre, Brazil (4.69), in Israel (3.6), and among Hispanics in Central California (3.0). The female predominance was less marked in Nagasaki, Japan, the UK (England and Wales), and among black people in the US. The incidence increases progressively with age, both in males and females, in all populations included in the survey. The increase in males is more marked after 50 years of age in Latin America. In summary, there is prominent geographic variability of gallbladder cancer incidence, which correlates with the prevalence of gallstones. The populations with the highest incidence are Chileans,17 Bolivians,10 North American Indians,11 Mexican-Americans,12,18 and Central Europeans,13 all of whom also have high prevalence of cholelithiasis.The high rates observed in Latin America are primarily in populations with high levels of Indian mixture,10,17 supporting the concept that increased susceptibility depends on genetic factors that predispose people to gallbladder cancer either as primary factors, or secondarily as promoters by favoring the development of cholesterol gallstones.

TRENDS IN AGE-ADJUSTED MORTALITY RATES

Mortality trends in the age-adjusted rates (standardized using the world population) over a 16-year period (1980 to 1995) were evaluated in twelve countries included in the World Health Organization (WHO) database (US, Canada, Hungary, United Kingdom, Italy, Austria, France, Spain, Japan, and Australia),19 and over a 10-yearperiod in Chile (1982 to 1991, standardized by the Chilean population of 1985).9 In Trujillo, Peru; Quito, Ecuador; Cali, Colombia; Porto Alegre, Brazil; Latina, Italy; and Costa Rica, approximately 20 percent of gallbladder cancer and biliary tract tumors in

352

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

women were classified as NOS. In contrast, in Nagasaki, Japan; among Hispanics of Central California; in Haut Rhin, France; Graubunden, Switzerland; Croatia; Shanghai, China; and in the UK (England and Wales) this proportion was less than five percent (Table 1). In Chile, 80 percent of adenocarcinoma of the biliary tree originates in the gallbladder, as assessed by pathological criteria.8 These gross differences probably reflect variations in the clinical or pathological criteria used to identify the exact origin of the adenocarcinoma of the biliary tree, which in the majority of the cases can only be diagnosed through laparotomy or necropsy. In spite of these difficulties, there is general agreement in the literature that the majority of adenocarcinoma of the biliary tree originates in the gallbladder mucosa. The highest mortality rate of gallbladder cancer in the world, 35 per 100,000 inhabitants, is found in Southern Chile (the region of the Araucania), which is inhabited by Chilean Hispanics and Mapuche Indians. This high mortality rate contrasts with the mean of the whole country, which had an age-adjusted mortality rate of 16.2 for women and 5.4 per 100,000 for men in 1991. These rates have been inversely correlated with the rates of cholecystectomy during the 1980s and early 1990s.20 Whereas the cholecystectomy rate was 44 percent among Chilean Hispanics with gallbladder disease (including cholelithiasis and cholecystectomy); the cholecystectomy rate for Mapuche Indians from Southern Chile with gallstones was only 8.6 percent.17 Analysis of mortality trends of a series of nine countries is shown in Figures 2 and 3. In the US, Canada, and Australia, mortality rates for both men and women decreased over the 16-year period under study; while in areas with high risk—such as in Japan—an increase is observed. Trends in mortality from gallbladder cancer for four European countries are

CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364

TABLE 1 International Variation in Cancer of the Gallbladder and of the Biliary Tract Not Otherwise Specified World Age-Adjusted Incidence Rates per 100,000 Cancer Registry

Gallbladder Cancer

Males

156.0 Females

Other and not specified

156.8-9 Males Females

Total

Female/Male Ratio

156.0 + 156.8-9 Males Females

New Mexico, US, American Indians

3.8

10.3

0

1.0

3.8

11.3

2.97

Setif, Algeria

3.6

9.8

0.3

0.8

3.9

10.6

2.71

Trujillo, Peru

2.3

6.9

1.0

2.2

3.3

9.1

2.75

Quito, Ecuador

2.1

5.5

2.0

2.2

4.1

7.7

1.80

Cali, Colombia

1.2

4.9

1.6

2.6

2.8

7.5

2.67

Kracow, Poland

3.1

5.9

0.6

0.6

3.7

6.5

1.75

Porto Alegre, Brazil

0.7

3.9

0.6

2.2

1.3

6.1

4.69

Czech Republic

2.6

5.1

0.4

0.6

3.0

5.7

1.90

Slovakia

1.8

5.0

0.3

0.3

2.1

5.3

2.52

Latina, Italy

1.8

3.9

0.6

1.0

2.4

4.9

2.04

Nagasaki, Japan

2.7

4.4

0.3

0.2

3.0

4.6

1.53

Costa Rica

1.0

3.2

1.0

1.3

2.0

4.5

2.25

Granada, Spain

1.7

3.5

0.5

0.6

2.2

4.1

1.86

Northwest Territories, Canada

2.1

4.0

0

0

2.1

4.0

1.90

Montevideo, Uruguay

1.2

3.0

0.6

0.7

1.8

3.7

2.05

Central California, US, Hispanics

1.0

3.5

0.2

0.1

1.2

3.6

3.00

Sweden

1.2

2.9

0.3

0.4

1.5

3.3

2.20

Haut Rhin, France

1.4

2.9

0.1

0

1.5

2.9

1.93

Graubunden, Switzerland

0.9

2.5

0.1

0

1.0

2.5

2.50

Croatia

1.0

2.3

0

0.1

1.0

2.4

2.40

Shanghai, China

1.2

2.2

0.1

0.1

1.3

2.3

1.77

South Australia

0.7

2.0

0.2

0.2

0.9

2.2

2.44

Israel, All Jews

0.4

1.7

0.1

0.1

0.5

1.8

3.60

Canada

0.7

1.2

0.1

0.1

0.8

1.3

1.62

US SEER, Whites

0.4

1.0

0.1

0.1

0.5

1.1

2.20

US SEER, Blacks

0.6

0.8

0.1

0.1

0.7

0.9

1.28

UK (England, Wales)

0.4

0.6

0.1

0

0.5

0.6

1.20

Source: Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, and Young J. Eds. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. VII. (IARC Scientific Publications No. 143). International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 1997.

Volume 51 • Number 6 • November/December 2001

353

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer

FIGURE 2 Trends in Mortality Rates for Gallbladder Cancer in US, Canada, Europe, Japan, and Australia,* 1980–1995

*Age-standardized rate per 100,000.

summarized in Figure 2. In countries with the highest rates (Hungary) and with the lowest rates (United Kingdom), a marked decline (especially in females) is observed. In Italy and Spain, two other countries with low rates, little variation is observed. On the other hand, one of the higher mortality rates in the world was observed in Chile (10.8 per 100,000 in 1991) with a marked increase during the period from 1982 to 1991 as shown in Figure 3, a trend concurrent with declining cholecystectomy rates during the same period.20 This last factor was probably a consequence of the health policy that reallocated resources from the treatment of adult chronic diseases to pediatric and obstetrical health care.17

354

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

MORPHOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS

Although it has been established that dysplasia and carcinoma in situ21 precede most gallbladder carcinomas, relatively little is known about the natural history of these precursor lesions. Most dysplasias and carcinomas in situ are diagnosed after cholecystectomy when the entire lesion is removed.22 However, there is indirect evidence that progression could occur from precursor lesions to infiltrating carcinoma. Dysplasia and carcinoma in situ are found in the mucosa adjacent to most carcinomas of the gallbladder, sometimes separated by histologically normal epithelium.22,23

CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364

FIGURE 3 Trends in Mortality Rates for Gallbladder Cancer in Chile,* 1982–1991

*Age-standardized rate per 100,000. Source: Ferrecio C, Chianalae J, Gonzalez C, Nervi F. Epidemiologia descriptiva del cancer digestivo en Chile (1982–1991): Una approximacion desde la mortalidad. 1995 Ed. Alfa Beta, Santiago, Chile.

Patients with dysplasia24 and carcinoma in situ22 are 15 and 5 years younger, respectively, than those with invasive carcinoma. If multiple sections of gallbladders removed for cholelithiasis are examined, dysplasia and carcinoma in situ are detected in 13.5 percent and 3.5 percent of the cases, respectively.22 There is consensus that if dysplasia and carcinoma in situ are found, multiple additional sections of the gallbladder should be examined to rule out invasive cancer. Over 90 percent of gallbladder carcinomas are adenocarcinoma.24,25 On gross examination, approximately 10 to 37 percent of the gallbladder carcinomas cannot be identified with certainty,24 and their macroscopic findings are similar to those of chronic cholecystitis. Gallstones are found in almost all cases of

gallbladder cancer (78 percent to 85 percent).8,22,26 Most carcinomas (60 percent) originate in the fundus of the gallbladder, 30 percent in the body, and 10 percent in the neck.22 The prevalence of gallbladder cancer associated with diffuse calcification of the gallbladder (so-called porcelain gallbladder) is 12 to 21 percent.26 Most gallbladder cancers are well-to-moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas. Some of these are papillary lesions that grow predominantly into the lumen of the gallbladder. The main prognostic factor for gallbladder carcinoma is the clinical or pathologic stage.27 Two staging systems for gallbladder carcinoma have been widely used. In 1976, Nevin et al.1 proposed a staging system in which Stage I cancer is limited to the mucosa; Stage II to the

Volume 51 • Number 6 • November/December 2001

355

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer

muscular layer; and Stage III to the perimuscular layer. Stage IV shows metastases in the lymph nodes; and Stage V has hepatic or other distant metastases. There is a correlation between level of tumor invasion in the gallbladder wall and the presence of lymph node metastases.24,27 In a large series of patients with gallbladder carcinoma,24 no lymph node metastases were detected in gallbladder tumors invading the muscularis only, whereas 62 percent of the tumors invading the serosa showed regional lymph node metastasis. Patients with localized stage disease have much better survival rates (Stages I to III, five-year survival rate of 41.9 percent) than those with regional (Stage IV, 3.8 percent) or distant (Stage V, 0.7 percent) metastasis.27,28 Similar results have been obtained using the TNM staging system of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), which has proven to be a good system for comparison of surgical results and prediction of patient outcome.29,30 Briefly, under the TNM classification: Stage I is a tumor limited to the mucosa or muscular layers; Stage II tumors invade the peri-muscular tissue; Stage III tumors invade serosa, liver less than two centimeters, or have regional (hepato-duodenal ligament) lymph node metastasis; and Stage IV shows liver invasion greater than two centimeters (Stage IVA), or metastasis to nonregional lymph nodes and/or distant organs (Stage IVB). The gallbladder’s very thin wall and the discontinuous muscular layer are believed to facilitate tumor invasion and contribute to the advanced local and regional disease usually present at the time of diagnosis.25 Tsukada et al.31 reported that the five-year survival rate in patients with TNM Stage I tumors was 91 percent; 85 percent in patients with Stage II tumors; 40 percent in patients with Stage III tumors; and 19 percent in patients with Stage IV tumors. In the same study, in patients with TNM Stage III and

356

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Stage IV tumors the five-year survival rate was 52 percent after curative resection. This was significantly better than the five percent fiveyear survival rate after a noncurative resection.

MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY

While considerable progress has been made in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of several human neoplasms, information about the genetic changes involved in gallbladder carcinogenesis is more limited.32 Most of these studies have focused on ras,33 TP53, and p16Ink4/CDKN2 34 gene abnormalities and deletions (“loss of heterozygosity”) at several chromosomal regions harboring known or putative tumor suppressor genes.32,34-35 The reported prevalence rates of ras gene mutations in series of gallbladder carcinomas is quite variable.7,34,36-37 While ras mutations were not detected in some small series,7 two other groups reported greater of K-ras mutations in 39 to 59 percent of patients.34,38 All the mutations occurred at codon 12 of the K-ras gene.7,34,36-37 However, this site has been the most intensively analyzed ras gene region. A greater frequency (50 to 83 percent) of K-ras gene mutations has been reported in gallbladder carcinomas from patients having anomalous junction of the pancreatico-biliary duct39-42 suggesting that reflux of pancreatic juice might contribute to the carcinogenic process. TP53 gene abnormalities are frequent in gallbladder cancers.43 Although the frequency of p53 immunostaining in gallbladder carcinoma varies widely (ranging from 35 to 92 percent), two thirds of the studies show a frequency greater than 50 percent.39,44-60 Most of the TP53 mutation studies on gallbladder carcinoma have confirmed the immunohistochemical findings.39,50,56,59,60 Analyses of exon 5 to 8 of TP53 have demonstrated point mutations in 31 to 70 percent of gallbladder

CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364

carcinomas,39,50,56,59-61 and no particular “hot spot” has been identified. In addition, deletions at the TP53 locus (17p13) have been frequently (58 to 92 percent) reported in gallbladder carcinomas,34,35 indicating that the inactivation of the TP53 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of this neoplasm.Yokoyama et al.60 compared the TP53 mutations in gallbladder carcinomas from two high-prevalence areas, Japan and Chile. No differences in the frequencies of TP53 mutations between both groups were detected. However, mutations from Japanese cases comprised transversions in 31 percent of cases with 46 percent of all mutations taking place at the A:T pair. Whereas, in contrast, the TP53 mutation spectrum for Chilean cases demonstrated a very high incidence of transitions (100 percent) and of mutations at G:C pairs. While no Japanese cases showed G:C to A:T transitions at CpG sites, these were relatively frequent (33 percent) in Chilean cases. Frequent transitions, especially at CpG sites, are features of mutational spectra found in cancers not strongly linked to specific exogenous carcinogens.62,63 There are a few studies that suggest that CDKN2 gene, also known as MTS1 or p16INK4, may play a role in gallbladder carcinogenesis.43 Deletions at the CDKN2 region (9p21) have been reported in half of gallbladder cancers.40 However, there are no comprehensive studies at present on the CDKN2 gene status and the mechanism of inactivation in gallbladder carcinoma, including deletion, mutation, methylation, homozygous deletions, and protein expression analysis. Although no comprehensive genome-wide allelotyping of gallbladder carcinoma has been published, two reports34,35 suggest that several chromosomal regions harboring known or putative tumor suppressor genes may undergo deletion in this neoplasm. These chromosomal regions, other than TP53 and CDKN2 gene

loci, are 3p (20 to 52 percent); 5q21 (APCMCC genes, 6 to 66 percent); 8p22-24 (22 to 44 percent); 13q14 (RB gene, 20 to 30 percent); and 18q22 (DCC gene, 18 to 31 percent).35 The exact sequence of molecular changes that lead to neoplastic transformation in the gallbladder epithelium remains uncertain. More detailed understanding of the earliest molecular abnormalities may eventually provide methods for risk assessment and early detection of gallbladder carcinoma.The excess accumulation of p53 protein in gallbladder dysplasia (0 to 32 percent) and carcinoma in situ lesions (45 to 86 percent)44,46,51,54 suggests that TP53 abnormality is an early event. The presence of deletions at the TP53 locus in histologically normal epithelium near gallbladder carcinoma,34 and of TP53 mutations in precursor lesions, (Miquel et al., in preparation), indicate an early and important role of TP53 inactivation. Other early genetic changes include loss of heterozygosity at 9p21 (CDKN2 gene) and 18q21 (DCC gene) regions.34 Data regarding K-ras gene mutations in precursor lesions are controversial.44,46,51,54 While some studies fail to demonstrate K-ras mutation in precursor gallbladder lesions,34,36 others report a relatively high prevalence (22 to 44 percent) in precursor lesions accompanying invasive tumors.1,34,42 Interestingly, no differences in the frequency and spectrum of K-ras gene mutations were detected in nonmalignant gallbladder epithelium of patients with anomalous junction of the pancreato-biliary duct, with and without gallbladder carcinoma in Japan.40,42 The role of adenomas as precursors of gallbladder carcinoma is still unclear and controversial. Molecular analyses of gallbladder adenomas failed to detect the genetic changes frequently found in gallbladder carcinomas and their known precursor lesions,32 suggesting that adenomas might not be precursors of this neoplasm.

Volume 51 • Number 6 • November/December 2001

357

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer

RISK FACTORS

Among other risk factors, a number of genetic, dietary factors, endo- and exobiotics, and chronic gallbladder infections, have been associated with the development of gallbladder cancer. However, the primary risk factor of gallbladder cancer as reported in all studies is gallstone disease.1-6,8-14 Gallbladder cancer has also been associated with multiple familial polyposis/Gardner syndrome,64 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome,65 “porcelain” gallbladder,66 and anomalous pancreato-biliary ductal union.67 There has also been a consistently higher risk in women than in men, independent of cholelithiasis.3,4,8,12 Gallbladder Cancer and Gallstones

The association between cholelithiasis and gallbladder cancer has been known since 186168-69 and is supported by autopsy studies, screening surveys, and hospital-based casecontrol studies (Table 2).1-6,8-14,70-79 Cholelithiasis is more frequent in gallbladder cancer than in extrahepatic bile ducts cancer. In a recent casecontrol study performed in Australia, Canada, Holland, and Poland, a history of gallbladder symptoms requiring medical attention was identified as one of the major risk factors for gallbladder cancer.73 This association was described in patients who had shown clinically symptomatic gallbladder disease for at least 20 years prior to gallbladder cancer diagnosis.70,71,73 The theoretical basis for this phenomenon is that the inflammation, chronic trauma, and infection in approximately one third of gallstone patients promotes epithelial dysplasia and adenocarcinoma formation.79 For this reason, it has been suggested that larger stones have a greater impact on the risk of developing gallbladder cancer, possibly reflecting greater duration and intensity of epithelial irritation. Diehl reported that in subjects with gallstones

358

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

larger than three centimeters, the risk of gallbladder cancer is 10 times greater than in subjects with gallstones smaller than one centimeter.80 Warren et al.81 reported a larger mean stone diameter among 19 subjects with gallbladder cancer (20.3 mm) when compared with 883 subjects undergoing surgery for gallstones (11.9 mm). In contrast, Moerman et al.82 found no association between stone size and gallbladder cancer. Cholesterol gallstones represent approximately 80 to 90 percent of all gallstone cases in the Western world and are considered to be a promoting factor. There is little available information as to whether pigment or cholesterol stones have a different activity as promoters of gallbladder cancer development. Some constituents of bile might be endogenous carcinogens.83 It has been postulated that mutagenic endobiotic derivatives, presumably from sterol bacterial metabolites, might be the putative initiators. Mutagenic factors were isolated from stone extracts of a patient with a symptomatic choledochal cyst (a high-risk precancerous condition) with chronic bacterial infection of the biliary tree.84 Only a small fraction (less than one percent) of patients with cholelithiasis develop gallbladder cancer,85 and approximately 20 percent of gallbladder cancer patients show no evidence of previous cholelithiasis.86 However in high-risk areas, this figure is certainly higher and increases markedly with age.8-12 Gallstone Predisposition

The etiology of cholesterol cholelithiasis, like any other chronic disease, is thought to involve the interaction of genetic and environmental factors.17,20,87 The risk factors for cholesterol gallstones have been mainly associated with hypersecretion of biliary cholesterol, gallbladder hypomotility, and stasis.88 These conditions are positively correlated with age, female sex, genetic

CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364

TABLE 2 Summary of Studies of Gallstones Disease and Gallbladder Cancer Cohort Studies

Site and Author

Population

Risk Factors

OR (CI 95%)

Denmark Chow et al. 199975

60,176 Danish Cancer Registry

Gallstones

Years of follow-up 1-4 years 4.6 (3.0-6.7) > 4 years 2.7 (1.5-4.4)

Case-Control Studies

Site and Author

Population

Risk Factors

OR (CI 95%)

New York, US Khan et al. 199973

69 cases 138 controls

Cholelithiasis and biliary tract cancer

19.5 (6.4-59.4)

Australia, Canada, Netherlands, and Poland Zatonski et al. 199776

196 cases 1515 controls

History of gallbladder symptoms Symptoms 20 years earlier

4.4 (2.6-7.5) 6.2 (2.8-13.4)

Bolivia and Mexico Strom et al. 19959

84 cases 126 controls without gallstones 264 controls with colelithiasis

Family history of gallstones

3.6 (1.3-11.4)

WHO Collaborative Study 198980

58 cases 355 controls

Gallstones

2.3 (1.2-4.4)

Cross-Sectional Studies

Site and Author

Population

Risk Factors

OR

Kofu, Japan Okamoto et al. 199974

194,767 Screening surveys

Gallstones

Increased risk p < .01

Tokyo, Japan Kimura et al. 198968

4,482 autopsy surveys

Gallstones

Increased risk p < .01

Chile Nervi et al.8 1988

14,768 autopsy surveys

Gallstones

7 p < .05

Rochester, Minnesota Maringhini et al. 198781

2,583 screening surveys

Gallstones

Increased risk in men p < .05

factors, obesity, multiple pregnancies, a family history of gallstones, and low levels of physical activity.89-101 Obesity and high-energy intake have been positively associated with the risk of gallstones in cohort102 and case-control103 studies. Conversely, coffee99 and alcohol91,97,101 were associated with a decreased risk of gallstones in some studies. There is evidence that

endogenous104 and exogenous estrogens105 and pregnancy increase the risk of cholelithiasis.106 Most environmental factors, including diet, have been considered a consequence of the westernization of modern societies.87,99 The association of diet and gallbladder cancer remains unclear. Most likely, dietary factors might influence the production of gallbladder

Volume 51 • Number 6 • November/December 2001

359

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer

cancer through potential effects on cholesterol gallstone formation.The principal independent factors associated with gallstone disease in several studies were female sex, greater age, high BMI, slightly higher serum glucose, increasing parity, and low plasma HDL cholesterol.17,18,107-109 Genetic Epidemiology of Gallbladder Diseases

There are some reports of familial tendencies toward gallbladder cancer, although they are based on a very small number of patients.110 A potential relationship between genetic predisposition and gallbladder cancer incidence has been suggested by population studies of gallstone prevalence in different latitudes.108-110 A recent study including three ethnic groups (Mapuche Indians and Hispanics from Chile and Maoris from Easter Island)17 concluded that cholesterol lithogenic genes are highly prevalent among Chilean Indians and Hispanics—populations with the highest mortality rates of gallbladder cancer.9 These studies strongly supported the thesis that genetic factors play a major role in some specific populations by favoring the production of lithogenic bile.88 The genetic hypothesis of cholesterol gallstone formation has also been supported by family studies.111 Specific polymorphisms of apoproteins and plasma cholesterol ester transfer proteins seem to be correlated with cholesterol cholelithiasis.112 Chronic Gallbladder Infection

During the last two decades, epidemiological evidence has linked chronic infections with several cancers; examples include hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses with liver cancer; H. pylori and gastric cancer; and liver flukes with cholangiocarcinoma.113,114 Chronic infection by Salmonella typhi has been associated with an increased risk of gallbladder cancer. Caygill et al.115,116 hypothesized that

360

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

typhoid and paratyphoid chronic carriage with concomitant gallstone formation favors mixed bacterial infection and higher risks of gallbladder carcinogenesis. Singh et al.117 proposed that the Salmonella carrier state has a significant association with gallbladder cancer independent of gallstones. However, the possible carcinogenic mechanism involved has not yet been clarified. It is important to note that Salmonella sp. have ß-glucuronidase activity, therefore hepatic inactivation of exogenous carcinogenic xenobiotics by glucuronidation could be reversed after bacterial hydrolysis of ßglucuronides.118 Strom et al.10 reported from Bolivia and Mexico a 12-fold increase in risk of gallbladder cancer in subjects with a history of typhoid fever (CI 95 percent 1.5-598), which unfortunately could not be corroborated with serological assays. Additionally, Nath et al.,119 in cultures of bile samples, found Salmonella typhi more frequently in patients with gallbladder cancer than in subjects with gallstones and free of biliary neoplasia. Occupation

Increased risk of gallbladder cancer has been related among workers in the oil, paper, chemical, shoe, textile, and cellulose acetate fiber manufacturing industries suggesting occupational exposure to carcinogens.120,121 A higher risk of gallbladder cancer was also found among miners exposed to radon.122

PREVENTION AND FUTURE TRENDS

Primary prevention of gallbladder cancer is unlikely in the near future, since many etiologic factors remain unknown. However, prevention of cholesterol gallstone formation is an important intervention that would certainly have a great impact in decreasing the incidence

CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364

of gallbladder cancer, particularly in high-risk areas. Availability of adequate and prompt laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone patients should be effective for secondary prevention. Relationship between Cholecystectomy Rates and Gallbladder Cancer Incidence Rates

Cholecystectomy is the most frequent of all intra-abdominal operations. It is estimated that in the US more than 550,000 cholecystectomies are performed yearly within an estimated population of 20,000,000 at-risk patients with asymptomatic gallstones.123 The US cholecystectomy rate was 47.6 per 1000 inhabitants in 1993, whereas the rate was only 25.1 per 1000 inhabitants in 1992 in Chile, in spite of a three to four times higher prevalence of cholelithiasis.9,20,124 The incidence of gallbladder cancer has diminished considerably, in an inverse correlation to the increase in cholecystectomies in developed countries.125-127 In Chile, while the reported cholecystectomy rates decreased in the 1980s, time trends revealed an increase in the incidence of gallbladder cancer. 9,20,124 In addition, the extremely low frequency of cholecystectomies found among Mapuche Indians with gallstones compared with Chilean Hispanics and Maoris 17 might explain the high mortality rates of gallbladder cancer in Southern Chile in areas inhabited by Mapuche Indians. A descriptive survey published in 19959 showed that gallbladder cancer mortality rates were over four times higher in towns with a high proportion of Mapuche Indians (35 per 100,000 inhabitants in the region of the Araucania, Southern Chile), compared with towns with a predominantly Hispanic population (8 per 100,000 inhabitants in the municipality of La Florida, Santiago).9

Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Secondary Prevention of Gallbladder Cancer

Three studies have analyzed the potential benefits of prophylactic cholecystectomy for low-risk populations. Based on decision analysis models, it was concluded that the benefits of prophylactic cholecystectomy were irrelevant when compared with expectant management of gallstone disease.128-130 The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy in high-risk populations, including North American Indians, Mexican Americans, Chileans, and Bolivians, has yet to be reported. A recent cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment among Chilean women under 40 years old with asymptomatic cholelithiasis, showed that prophylactic laparoscopic cholecystectomy can significantly benefit the population at a very low incremental cost (Puschel et al., personal communication, Santiago, 2000).

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Little is still known about the etiology of gallbladder cancer.This overview of gallbladder cancer and the annual incidence of gallbladder cancer in various countries offers a comparative picture of the descriptive epidemiology of the disease, a summary of etiologic studies, and a discussion of associated risk factors, especially cholesterol gallstone disease—the major risk factor of gallbladder cancer. It is important that several remaining points be elucidated. Further investigation for this extremely lethal cancer is urgently needed. What do we really know for sure and what needs to be done? 1) The process of gallbladder carcinogenesis is usually related to a history of cholelithiasis, which is frequently present for at least 20 years before the tumor appears. 2) Although several risk factors have been

Volume 51 • Number 6 • November/December 2001

361

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer

identified for cholesterol stones (obesity, multiple pregnancies, low plasma HDL, female hormones, and insulin resistance), they do not explain the full picture. Genetic susceptibility is likely to play an important role. 3) Because only a small fraction of patients with cholesterol gallstones develop gallbladder cancer, it is important to identify the factors that induce progression from cholelitiasis to gallbladder cancer. This may allow the identification and early treatment of gallstones of susceptible individuals within high-risk populations. 4) The role of chronic infection in the development of gallbladder cancer deserves further research. It is likely that aside from chronic Salmonella carriers, a number of other bacterial species chronically inhabiting the gallbladder might be important etiologic factors. 5) The limitations of epidemiologic gallbladder cancer studies have included the small

REFERENCES 1. Nevin JE. Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Cancer 1976;37:141-148. 2. Perpetuo M, Valdivieso M, Heilbrun L, et al. Natural history study of gallbladder cancer. Cancer 1978;42:330-335. 3. Hurt J, Shani M, Modan B. Epidemiological aspects of gallbladder and biliary tract neoplasm. Am J Public Health 1972;62:36-39. 4. Carriaga M, Henson DE. Liver, gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts, and pancreas. Cancer 1995;75:171-190. 5. Henson D, Albores-Saavedra J, Corle D. Carcinoma of the gallbladder: Histologic types, stage of disease, grade, and survival rates. Cancer 1992;70:1493-1497. 6. Paimela H, Karppinen A, Höckerstedt K, Perhoniemi V, et al. Poor prognosis of gallbladder cancer persists regardless of improved diagnostic methods. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1997;86:13-17. 7. Tada M, Yokosuka O, Omata M, Ohto, M, Isono K. Analysis of ras gene mutations in biliary and pancreatic tumors by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing. Cancer 1990;66: 930-935. 8. Nervi F, Duarte I, Gomez G, Rodriguez G, et al. Frequency of gallbladder cancer in Chile, a high risk area. Int J Cancer 1988;41:657-660. 9. Ferreccio C, Chianale J, González C, Nervi F. Epidemiología Descriptiva del Cáncer Digestivo

362

size of populations studied and problems in quantifying exposure to putative exogenous risk factors, particularly potential carcinogenic xenobiotics. Multicenter case-control studies in high-risk populations in which accurate biomarkers of exposure to various risk factors are used and the genetic factors are assessed will be of great value in answering several of the questions raised in this review. 6) Primary prevention of gallbladder cancer is not expected in the near future. However, secondary prevention, primarily oriented to treatment of symptomatic gallstones, must be emphasized in endemic areas where cholelithiasis is highly prevalent. Prophylactic laparoscopic cholecystectomy might be cost effective. It is apparent that interventional programs are urgently needed to decrease the number of gallbladders at risk for gallbladder cancer development in high-risk areas, CA particularly in the Andean region.

en Chile (1982-1991): Una Aproximación desde la Mortalidad. Monography. Alfa Beta, Santiago, Chile. 1995. 10. Strom B, Soloway R, Rios-Dalenz J, Rodríguez-Martinez H, et al. Risk factors for gallbladder cancer. An international collaborative case control study. Cancer 1995;76:1747-1756. 11. Black W, Key C, Carmany T, Herman D. Carcinoma of the gallbladder in a population of southwestern American Indians. Cancer 1977; 39:1267-1279. 12. Diehl A. Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer: A synthesis of recent data. J Natl Cancer Int 1980;65:1209-1214. 13. Zatonski W, La Vecchia C, Levi F, Negri E, Lucchini F. Descriptive epidemiology of gallbladder cancer in Europe. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1993;119(3):165-171. 14. Dhir V, Mohandas KM. Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India IV. Gall bladder and pancreas. Indian J Gastroenterol 1999;18: 24-28. 15. Parkin DM,Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J. Eds. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol VII (IARC Scientific Pub. No. 143). Lyon, IARC, 1997. 16. International classification of disease: ninth revision. World Health Organization, Geneva. 1977. 17. Miquel JF, Covarrubias C, Villaroel L,

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Mingrone G, et al. Genetic epidemiology of cholesterol cholelithiasis among Chilean Hispanics, Amerindians, and Maoris. Gastroenterology 1998;115:937-946. 18. Hanis GL, Chakraborty R, Ferrel RE, Schull, WJ. Individual admixture estimates: disease associations and individual risk of diabetes and gallbladder disease among Mexican-Americans in Starr County, Texas. Am J Phys Anthropol 1986; 70:433-441. 19. World Health Organization (WHO) Mortality database. Geneva, 1999. 20. Chianale J, Del Pino G, Nervi F. Increasing gall-bladder cancer mortality rate during the last decade in Chile, a high-risk area. Int J Cancer 1990; 46:1131-1133. 21. Albores-Saavedra J, Henson DE, Sobin LH. The WHO histological classification of tumors of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts. A commentary on the second edition. Cancer 1992;70: 410-414. 22. Albores-Saavedra, J, Alcantra-Vazquez A, Cruz-Ortiz H, Herrera-Goepfert R.The precursor lesions of invasive gallbladder carcinoma. Hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma in situ. Cancer 1980;45:919-927. 23. Albores-Saavedra J, de Jesus Manrique J, Angeles-Angeles A, Henson DE. Carcinoma in situ of the gallbladder. A clinicopathologic study of 18 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1984; 8:323-333.

CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:349-364

24. Roa I, Araya J C, Villaseca M, Roa J, de Aretxabala X, et al. Gallbladder cancer in a high risk area: morphological features and spread patterns. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:15401546. 25. Levin B. Gallbladder carcinoma. Ann Oncol 1999;10:129-130. 26. Roa I, Araya J C,Villaseca M, De Aretxabala X, et al. Preneoplastic lesions and gallbladder cancer: an estimate of the period required for progression. Gastroenterology 1996;111:232-236. 27. Henson D E, Albores-Saavedra J, Corle D. Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Histologic types, stage of disease, grade, and survival rates. Cancer 1992;70:1493-1497. 28. Johnson LA, Lavin PT, Dayal YY, et al. Gallbladder adenocarcinoma: the prognostic significance of histologic grade. J Surg Oncol 1987;34:16-18. 29. Muratore A, Polastri R, Capussotti L. Radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: current options. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000; 26:438-443. 30. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al., eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1997. 31.Tsukada K, Hatakeyama K, Kurosaki I, et al. Outcome of radical surgery for carcinoma of the gallbladder according to the TNM stage. Surgery 1996; 120:816-821. 32. Wistuba II, Miquel JF, Gazdar AF, AlboresSaavedra J. Gallbladder adenomas have molecular abnormalities different from those present in gallbladder carcinomas. Hum Pathol 1999;30:21-25. 33. Tanno S, Obara T, Fujii T, et al. Proliferative potential and K-ras mutation in epithelial hyperplasia of the gallbladder in patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union. Cancer 1998;83:267-275. 34.Wistuba II, Sugio K, Hung J, et al. Allele-specific mutations involved in the pathogenesis of endemic gallbladder carcinoma in Chile. Cancer Res 1995;55:2511-2515. 35.Chang H J, Kim, SW, Kim YT, Kim W H. Loss of heterozygosity in dysplasia and carcinoma of the gallbladder. Mod Pathol 1999;12:763-769. 36. Imai M, Hoshi T, Ogawa K. K-ras codon 12 mutations in biliary tract tumors detected by polymerase chain reaction denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Cancer 1994;73:2727-2733. 37. Saetta A, Lazaris A C, Davaris PS. Detection of ras oncogene point mutations and simultaneous proliferative fraction estimation in gallbladder cancer. Pathol Res Pract 1996;192:532-540. 38. Ajiki T, Fujimori T, Onoyama H, et al. K-ras gene mutation in gall bladder carcinomas and dysplasia. Gut 1996;38:426-429. 39. Hanada K, Itoh M, Fujii K, et al. K-ras and p53 mutations in Stage I gallbladder carcinoma with an anomalous junction of the pancreaticobiliary duct. Cancer 1996;77:452-458. 40. Matsubara T, Sakurai Y, Sasayama Y, et al. K-ras point mutations in cancerous and noncancerous biliary epithelium in patients with pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Cancer 1996;77:1752-1757. 41. Tomono H, Nimura Y, Aono K, et al. Point mutations of the c-Ki-ras gene in carcinoma and atypical epithelium associated with congenital biliary dilation. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91: 1211-1214. 42. Iwase T, Nakazawa S,Yamao K, et al. Ras gene point mutations in gallbladder lesions associated

with anomalous connection of pancreatobiliary ducts. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44:14571462. 43.Wistuba II,Albores-Saavedra J. Genetic abnormalities involved in the pathogenesis of gallbladder carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1999;6:237-244. 44. Kamel D, Paakko P, Nuorva K,Vahakangas K, Soini Y. p53 and c-erbB-2 protein expression in adenocarcinomas and epithelial dysplasias of the gall bladder. J Pathol 1993;170:67-72. 45. Teh M, Wee A, Raju GC. An immunohistochemical study of p53 protein in gallbladder and extrahepatic bile duct/ampullary carcinomas. Cancer 1994;74:1542-1545. 46.Wee A,Teh M, Raju GC. Clinical importance of p53 protein in gall bladder carcinoma and its precursor lesions. J Clin Pathol 1994;47:453-456. 47. Lee CS, Pirdas A. p53 protein immunoreactivity in cancers of the gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts and ampulla of Vater. Pathology 1995;27:117-120. 48. Oohashi Y,Watanabe H,Ajioka Y, Hatakeyama K. p53 immunostaining distinguishes malignant from benign lesions of the gall-bladder [published erratum appears in Pathol Int 1995 Mar;45: 259]. Pathol Int 1995;45:58-65. 49. Diamantis I, Karamitopoulou E, Perentes E, Zimmermann A. p53 protein immunoreactivity in extrahepatic bile duct and gallbladder cancer: correlation with tumor grade and survival. Hepatology 1995;22:774-779. 50. Fujii K,Yokozaki H,Yasui W, et al. High frequency of p53 gene mutation in adenocarcinomas of the gallbladder. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996;5:461-466. 51. Wistuba II, Gazdar AF, Roa I, AlboresSaavedra J. p53 protein overexpression in gallbladder carcinoma and its precursor lesions: an immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol 1996; 27:360-365. 52. Sasatomi E, Tokunaga O, Miyazaki K. Spontaneous apoptosis in gallbladder carcinoma. Relationships with clinicopathologic factors, expression of E-cadherin, bcl-2 protooncogene, and p53 oncosuppressor gene. Cancer 1996;78: 2101-2110. 53. Washington K, Gottfried MR. Expression of p53 in adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder and bile ducts. Liver 1996;16:99-104. 54. Ajiki T, Onoyama H,Yamamoto M, et al. p53 protein expression and prognosis in gallbladder carcinoma and premalignant lesions. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43:521-526. 55. Itoi T,Watanabe H,Ajioka,Y, et al.APC, K-ras codon 12 mutations and p53 gene expression in carcinoma and adenoma of the gall-bladder suggest two genetic pathways in gall-bladder carcinogenesis. Pathol Int 1996;46:333-340. 56. Hanada K, Itoh M, Fujii K, et al.TP53 mutations in stage I gallbladder carcinoma with special attention to growth patterns. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:1136-1140. 57. Roa I, Villaseca M, Araya, et al. p53 tumour suppressor gene protein expression in early and advanced gallbladder carcinoma. Histopathology 1997;31:226-230. 58. Roa I, Villaseca M, Araya JC, et al. DNA ploidy pattern and tumor suppressor gene p53 expression in gallbladder carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997;6:547-550.

59. Itoi T, Watanabe H, Yoshida M, et al. Correlation of p53 protein expression with gene mutation in gall-bladder carcinomas. Pathol Int 1997;47:525-530. 60. Yokoyama N, Hitomi, J, Watanabe H, et al. Mutations of p53 in gallbladder carcinomas in high-incidence areas of Japan and Chile. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:297-301. 61. Takagi S, Naito E, Yamanouchi H, et al. Mutation of the p53 gene in gallbladder cancer. Tohoku J Exp Med 1994;172:283-289. 62. Jones PA, Buckley JD, Henderson BE, Ross RK, Pike MC. From gene to carcinogen: a rapidly evolving field in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Res 1991;51:3617-3620. 63. Rideout WMD, Coetzee GA, Olumi AF, Jones PA. 5-Methylcytosine as an endogenous mutagen in the human LDL receptor and p53 genes. Science 1990;249:1288-1290. 64. Walsh N. Biliary neoplasia in Gardner’s syndrome. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987;111:76-77. 65. Wada K. Carcinoma and polyps of the gallbladder associated with Peutz-Jeguers syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:943-946. 66. Kimura K. Association of gallbladder carcinoma and anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union. Gastroenterology 1985;89:1258-1265. 67. Chang LY,Wang HP,Wu MS, et al.Anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union—an etiologic association of gallbladder cancer and adenomyomatosis. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:20162019. 68. Graham E. The prevention of carcinoma of the gallbladder. Ann Surg 1931;93:317-322. 69. Hart J, Modan B, Shani M. Cholelithiasis in the aetiology of gallbladder neoplasms. Lancet 1971;1:1151-1153. 70. Khan Z, Neugut A, Ahsan H, Chabot J. Risk factors for biliary tract cancers. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:149-152. 71. Okamoto M, Okamoto H, Kitahara F, et al. Ultrasonographic evidence of association of polyps and stones with gallbladder cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:446-450. 72. Chow W, Johansen C, Gridley G, et al. Gallstones, cholecystectomy and risk of cancers of the liver, biliary tract and pancreas. Br J Cancer 1999;79:640-644. 73. Zatonski W, Lowenfels B, Boyle P, Maisonneuve P, et al. Epidemiologic Aspects of Gallbladder Cancer: A case control study of the SEARCH Program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1132-1138. 74. Ghadirian P, Simard A, Baillargeon J. A population based case control study of cancer of the bile ducts and gallbladder in Quebec, Canada. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1993;41:107-112. 75. Zatonski W, La Vecchia C, Przewozniak K, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels B, Boyle P. Risk factors for gallbladder cancer: A Polish case control study. Int J Cancer 1992;51:707-711. 76. Kimura W, Shimada H, Kuroda A, Morioka Y. Carcinoma of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile duct in autopsy cases of the aged, with special reference to its relationship to gallstones. Am J Gastroenterol 1989;84:386-390. 77. Combined oral contraceptives and gallbladder cancer.The WHO collaborative study of neoplasia and steroid contraceptives. Int J Epidemiol 1989;18:309-314.

Volume 51 • Number 6 • November/December 2001

363

Epidemiology and Molecular Pathology of Gallbladder Cancer 78. Maringhini A, Moreau JA, Melton LJ, Hench VS, Zinsmesiter AR, DiMagno EP. Gallstones, gallbladder cancer, and other gastrointestinal malignancies. An Epidemiologic study in Rochester, Minnesota. Ann Intern Med 1987; 107:30-35. 79. Paz B, Kunakow N, Montiel F, Nervi F. Incidence of Salmonella typhi infection in symptomatic cholelithiasis in an endemic area. A prospective study. Gastroenterol Hepatol 1986; 9: 121-124. 80. Diehl A. Gallstone size and the risk of gallbladder cancer. JAMA 1983;250:2323-2326. 81.Warren BL, Marais AW. Carcinoma of the gallbladder. A possible regional predisposition in the western Cape and northern Cape. S Afr J Surg 1995;33:161-164. 82. Moerman C, Lagerwaard FJ, Bueno de Mesquita H, Van dalen A, Van Leeuwen M, Schrover P. Gallstone size and the risk of gallbladder cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28: 482-486. 83. Lowenfels AB. Does bile promote extracolonic cancer? Lancet 1978;2:2239-2241. 84. Soloway R, Takabayashi A, Rios Dalenz J, Nakayama F. Geographic differences in the operative incidence and type of pigment gallstones and in the noncholesterol components of cholesterol gallstones. Hepatol Rapid Lit Rev 1981; 11:1637-1638. 85.Wenckert A, Robertson B.The natural course of gallbladder disease: Eleven year review of 781 non-operated cases. Gastroenterology 1966;50: 376-381. 86. Diehl A. Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer: A synthesis of recent data. J Natl Cancer Int 1980;65:1209-1214. 87. Burkitt DP. Some diseases characteristic of modern western civilization. BMJ 1973;1:274278. 88.Apstein MD, Carey MC. Pathogenesis of cholesterol gallstones: a parsimonious hyphotesis. Eur J Clin Invest 1996;26:343-352. 89.Attili AF, Capocaccia R, Carulli N, et al. Factors associated with gallstone disease in the MICOL experience. Hepatology 1997;26:809-818. 90.Villalpando GC, Rivera D,Arredondo B, et al. High prevalence of cholelithiasis in a low income Mexican population: an ultrasonographic survey. Arch Med Res 1997;28:543-547. 91. Martinez C, Carballo F, Horcajo P, et al. Prevalence and associated factors for gallstone diasease: Results of a population survey in Spain. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:1347-55. 92. Acalovschi MV, Blendea D, Pascu M, et al. Risk of asymptomatic and symptomatic gallstones in moderately obese women: a longitudinal follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:127-131. 93. Leitzmann M, Giovannucci E, Rimm E, et al. The relation of physical activity to risk for symptomatic gallstone disease in men.Ann Intern Med 1998;128:417-425. 94. Chen CY, Lu CL, Huang YS, et al. Age is one of the risk factors in developing gallstone disease in Taiwan. Age Ageing 1998;27:437-441. 95. Kratzer W, Kachele V, Mason R, et al. Gallstone prevalence in Germany. The Ulm gallbladder stone study. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43: 1285-1291.

364

96. Mendez N, Vega H, Uribe M, Guevara L, Ramos M, Vargas F. Risk factors for gallstone disease in Mexicans are similar to those found in Mexican-Americans. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43: 935-939. 97. Moro P, Checkley W, Gilman R, et al. Gallstone disease in high altitude Peruvian rural populations. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:153158. 98. Misciagna G, Centonze S, Leoci C, et al. Diet, physical activity, and gallstones: a population based, case control study in southern Italy. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:120-126. 99. Leitzmann M, Willett W, Rimm E, et al. A prospective study of coffee consumption and the risk of symptomatic gallstone disease in men. JAMA 1999;281:2106-2112. 100. Kodama H, Kono S, Todoroki I, et al. Gallstone disease risk in relation to body mass index and waist to hip ratio in Japanese men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:211-216. 101. Leitzmann M, Giovannucci E, Stampfer M, et al. Prospective study of alcohol consumption patterns in relation to symptomatic gallstone disease in men. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23: 835-841. 102. Maclure KM, Hayes KC, Golditz GA, et al. Weight, diet and risk of symtomatic gallstones and middle age women. N Engl J Med 1989;351:563-569. 103. Scragg RKR, McMichael AJ, Baghurst PA. Diet, alcohol, and relative weight in gallstone disease: a case control study. BMJ 1984;288:11131119. 104. Everson GT, McKinley C, Lawson M, Johnson M, Kern F, Gallbladder function in the human female: effect of the ovulatory cycle, pregnancy, and contraceptive steroids. Gastroenterology 1982;2:711-719. 105. Scragg R, McMichael A, Seamark R. Oral contraceptives, pregnancy, and endogenous oestrogen in gallstone disease: a case control study. BMJ 1984;288:1795-1799. 106. Lambe M, Trichopoulos D, Hsieh C, et al. Parity and cancers of the gall bladder and the extrahepatic bile ducts. Int J Cancer 1993;54: 941-944. 107. Maclure KM, Hayes KC, Colditz GA, et al. Weight, diet, and the risk of symptomatic gallstones in middle-aged women. N Engl J Med 1989;321:563-569. 108. Everhart JE. Contributions of obesity and weight loss to gallstone disease. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:1029-1035. 109. Petitti DB, Friedman GD, Klatsky AL. Association of a history of gallbladder disease with reduced concentration of high-densitylipoprotein cholesterol. N Engl J Med 1981; 304:1396-1398. 110. Fernandez E, La Vechhia C, D’Avanzo B, Negri E, Franceshi S. Family history and the risk of liver, gallbladder, and pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994; 3:209-212. 111. an der Linden W. Genetic factors in gallstone disease. Clin Gastroenterol 1973;2:603-614. 112. Junoven T, Savolainen MJ, Kairaluoma MI, Lajunen LHJ, Humphries SE, Kesäniemi YA. Polymorphisms at the apoB, apoA-I, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene loci in patients

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

with gallbladder disease. J Lipid Res 1995; 36:804-812. 113. Kato K, Akai S, Tominaga S, Kato I. A case control study of biliary tract cancer in Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Jpn J Cancer Res 1989;80:932938. 114. Coursaget P, Munoz N. Vaccination against infectious agents associated with human cancer. Cancer Surv 1999;33:355-381. 115. Caygill C, Hill M, Braddick M, Sharp J. Cancer mortality in chronic typhoid and paratyphoid carriers. Lancet 1994;343:83-84. 116. Caygill CP, Braddick M, Hill M, Knowles R, Sharp J. The association between typhoid carriage, typhoid infection and subsequent cancer at a number of sites. Eur J Cancer Prev 1995;4: 187-193. 117. Singh H, Pandey M, Shuk K. Salmonella carrier state, chronic bacterial infection and gallbladder carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer Prev 1996;5:144. 118. Lobos T, Fuentes D, Nervi F. Glucuronidase activity in Salmonella typhi and parathyphi. Re Méd Chil 1988;116:1335-1340. 119. Nath G, Singh H, Shukla V. Chronic typhoid carriage and carcinoma of the gallbladder. Eur J Cancer Prev 1997;6:557-559. 120. Paraf F, Paraf A, Barge J. Les toxiques industriels sont-ils un facteur de risque du cancer de la vesicule biliaire? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1990;14:877-880. 121. Goldberg M, Theriault G. Retrospective Cohort Study of Workers of a Synthetic Textiles Plant in Quebec: I. General Mortality. Am J Ind Med 1994;25:889-907. 122. Tomasek L, Darby S, Swerdlow A, Placek V, Kunz E. Randon exposure and cancers other than lung cancer among uranium miners in West Bohemia. Lancet 1993;341:919-923. 123. Rothenberg R, Laraja R, McCoy R, Pryce E. Elective Cholecystectomy and carcinoma of the gallbladder. Am Surg 1991;57:306-308. 124. Serra I, Calvo A, Maturana M, Sharp A. Billiary tract cancer in Chile. Int J Cancer 1990;46:965-971. 125. Diehl A and Beral V. Cholecystectomy and changing mortality from gallbladder cancer. Lancet 1981;2:187-189. 126. Blanken A. Hospital discharges and length of stay: Short stay hospitals, United States, 1972.Vital Health Stat 1976;10:1-66. 127. Ahlberg J, Ewerth S, Hellers G, Holmstrom B. Decreasing frequency of cholecystectomies in the countries of Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden.Acta Chir Scand 1978; Suppl 482:21-23. 128. Ransohoff DF, Gracie W, Wolfenson L, Neuhaser D. Prophylactic cholecystectomy of expectant management for silent gallstones. A decision analysis. Ann Intern Med 1983; 99:199204. 129. Kottke T, Feldman R,Albert D.The risk ratio is insufficient for clinical decision. The case of prophylactic cholecystectomy. Med Decis Making 1984; 4:177. 130. Ransohoff D, Gracie WA.Treatment of gallstones. Ann Intern Med 1993;119: 606-622.