ENVISAT time series

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy Interseismic deformation a...
Author: Joella Hawkins
5 downloads 2 Views 8MB Size
Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

Interseismic deformation along the 1908 earthquake normal fault in the Straits of Messina, measured by means of SBAS ERS/ENVISAT time series Cristiano Tolomei, Simone Atzori and Stefano Salvi Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia

Research funded by the ASI-SIGRIS project

The Straits of Messina The largest earthquake of the XX century in Italy Mw = 7.1 Debated earthquake source (6 different fault models proposed) To be crossed by a 4-km long suspended bridge

From Amoruso et al, 2002, JGR

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

2/20

SAR data for SBAS processing Descending dataset • 71 ERS images from May 1992, to July 2002 • 183 interferograms Ascending dataset • 37 ERS + 34 ENVISAT images from September 1992, to April 2008 • 181 interferograms Baseline constraints

Multi-temporal Differential SAR Interferometry (SBAS) algorithm (Berardino P., Fornaro G., Lanari R.,Sansosti E., IEEE, 2002).

Bt = 1200 days Bn = 200 meters

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

3/20

LoS Ground Velocity Maps

Descending orbit

Ascending orbit Reference point

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

4/20

Time Series examples Ascending case

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

5/20

CGPS reference point - TGRC Courtesy, Serpelloni (INGV-Bo), 2008

TGRC GPS site displacements (2000-2008) along E, N and Up directions (in black) and along the ascending ERS LoS (in green).

SAR displacement time series at TGRC, scaled to the GPS LoS time series.

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

6/20

LoS Scaled ground velocity maps

Ascending orbit

Descending orbit

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

7/20

Up component

Based on the GPS velocity field, we assume the North velocity = 1mm/yr Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

8/20

SAR East velocity field in agreement with GPS

East Component

GPS velocities w.r.t. MTTG

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

9/20

Modeling We test if the observed velocities can be interpreted in term of interseismic strain accumulation along the 1908 earthquake fault. We first re-model the 1908 seismic dislocation using coseismic observations from a 1907-1909 levelling line (about 100 benchmarks).

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

10/20

The 1908 seismic source

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

11/20

1908 source parameters Length  (m)

Width (m)

Depth (m)

Strike  (deg)

Dip (deg)

East (m)

North (m)

Rake (deg)

Slip  (cm)

29706

18211

2269

‐7.3

42

556736

4215388

‐125.2

135.5

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

12/20

Interseismic deformation modeling Method: We inverted the SAR LoS velocity data using an elastic dislocation model (Okada, 1985) for an infinite dislocation. Results: We cannot obtain a good fit to the observations using a 1908-type dislocation. We obtain a good fit (RMS ~ 1 mm/yr) using a slightly different source

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

13/20

Interseismic deformation modeling Ascending modeled velocity

Ascending observed velocity

Length (m)

Width (m)

Depth (m)

Strike  (deg)

Dip (deg)

East (m)

North (m)

Rake (deg)

Slip  (cm)

500000

100000

9051

10

70

542690

4218000

‐125

0.5

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

14/20

Interseismic vs coseismic source

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

15/20

Residuals & profile Ascending case

Descending case

Residuals (ascending): RMS = 1.08 mm/yr Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

16/20

Conclusions The ground velocities could be estimated mainly along the coast (urban areas) The vertical velocities indicate that Sicily is uplifting w.r.t. Calabria Good agreement between SAR and GPS East velocities Interseismic deformation is justified by deep slip (below 9 km) on a fault with different geometry than the 1908 modeled source. On the other hand, modeling the 1908 co-seismic displacements using the geometry of the interseismic source, degrades the model fit only slightly (RMS of residuals increases from 3 to 5 cm). To improve our interseismic model, we need more data to better constrain the actual mechanism of strain accumulation Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

Interseismic for the coseismic source

Coseismic model from interseismic parameters

Coseismic model from leveling data

Interseismic model from SAR data

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

18/20

Up Component Profile 1 - Up Component

E

4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4

250 Elevation (meters)

Ground Velocity (mm/yr)

W

200 150 100 50 0 0

1200

2400

3600

4800

6000

7200

8400

9600

10800

Distance, m

E

Groubd Velocity (mm/yr)

3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 0

1200

2400

3600

4800

6000

7200

8400

9600

10800 12000 13200

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

Elevation (meters)

Profile 2 - Up Component

W

14400 15600

Distance, m

Profile 4 - Up Component

SE

5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0

2400

4800

7200

9600

12000

Elevation (meters)

Ground Velocity (mm/yr)

NW

NW

SE

200 150

0

100 -5

50

-10

Elevation (meters)

Profile 3 - Up Component

Ground Velocity (mm/yr)

5

0 0

1600

3200

4800

6400

Distance, m

14400

Distance, Advances in the Science andm Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

19/20

Descending processing problem D

C

B D

C

A B

A

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

20/20

Time Series examples Descending dataset

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

21/20

GPS North

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

22/20

Interseismic 2D deformation modeling Descending observed velocity

Descending modeled velocity

Advances in the Science and Applications of SAR Interferometry ESA ESRIN, 30th November - 4th December 2009 Frascati, Italy

23/20