Environmental Comparisons of Steel and Plastic Automotive Fuel Tanks

Environmental Comparisons of Steel and Plastic Automotive Fuel Tanks Peter R. Mould Program Manager Strategic Alliance for Steel Fuel Tanks (SASFT) P...
Author: Mary White
2 downloads 1 Views 629KB Size
Environmental Comparisons of Steel and Plastic Automotive Fuel Tanks Peter R. Mould Program Manager Strategic Alliance for Steel Fuel Tanks (SASFT)

Presentation to Great Designs in Steel Seminar (GDISS) Livonia, MI March 9, 2005

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

1

INTRODUCTION Automobile Fuel Tanks

● ● ● Competitive

issues between steel and plastic

y Engineering performance — structural, fatigue, etc.

y y y y

Weight Design flexibility Cost Full service supply

AND Environmental issues

Today’s focus www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

2

INTRODUCTION Environmental benefits of steel fuel tanks

y Proven recyclability y Low evaporative system emissions

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

3

RECYCLING OVERVIEW Recycling of a Typical Automobile

● ● ● 1999

study by Steel Recycling Institute

— Model year 1980 - 1990 — Average vehicle weight: 3,252 pounds — Based on survey of auto dismantlers and shredders and American Metal Market automobile materials data Plastic** (212#)

Steel* (2324#) 120

120

100%

99.9% 100

100

80

80

60

60

40

40 20

20

0%

0.1%

0

0

RECYCLED

LANDFILLED

*includes steel tanks

RECYCLED

**almost no plastic tanks

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

LANDFILLED

4

RECYCLING — STEEL TANKS

Recycling

TODAY steel fuel tanks are fully recycled

●●●

Dismantled Re-use option

Hulk

Infrastructure in place

Scrap option

Crushing Shredding of hulk

Specific parts inc. tanks “Fluff” No value

About 40% plastic Landfilled

Other Metals 25 to 75% recycled

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

Tanks Crushing, Bailing, Shredding

Steel Recycled 99.9% returned as scrap to steel mills

5

RECYCLING — PLASTIC TANKS

Recycling

TODAY plastic tanks are NOT re-used or recycled

●●●

Dismantled plastic tank

Absorbed gasoline in wall of tank

Complicated recycling High cost Hazard in shredding

Hazard in re-use Landfill

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

6

CONSEQUENCES Consequence of more plastic tanks ● ● ● f

Increased disposal of plastic tanks at end of life of automobiles — landfill — incineration

f

Negative impact on existing automotive recycling infrastructure — dismantlers — shredders

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

7

CONSEQUENCES Plastic tank vehicles in NA, %

100 90

82

80 80

Source: ITB Group

70

60

As plastic tanks increase — impact on disposal will increase

60 50

40 40 30

25

20 10 0 90

92

94

96

98

Model Year

00

02

04

06

08

No. of EOL plastic tanks in NA, millions

average vehicle life of 14 yrs.

20

16.6

15.5 16

11.5 12

8

6.9 4.1

4

0 4

6

8

10

12

14

Year

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

16

18

20

8

22

IMPACT The full impact of plastic fuel tanks In North America ● ● ● ― 254 million vehicles on the road ― If 80% of vehicles have plastic tanks when vehicles are retired ● ● ●

Plastic tanks placed end-to-end would stretch: ―125,000 miles ―5 times around the world ●●●

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

9

IMPACT If landfilled

●●●

a mountain of plastic tanks.

1300 ft.

1300 ft. ●●●

or Incinerate?

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

10

PILOT PROCESS FOR PLASTIC TANKS Pilot processes for plastic tanks are being developed Example: RECAFUTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Partnership: Solvay, Inergy, Watco, Renault, Ciba, and University of Lisbon Co-financed: European Commission

Source: Solvay website

Technically feasible: BUT . . . high cost . . . no commercial infrastructure

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

11

COMPARISION OF RECYCLING Plastic Fuel Tanks

Steel Fuel Tanks

Tank Manufacturing

Steel processing Tank Manufacturing

Compounding Assembly on Vehicle

HDPE EOL

Feedstocks

Steel refining

Assembly on Vehicle

Iron and Steel Scrap

Dismantling

Dismantling

BROKEN LOOP

EOL

CLOSED LOOP

Deserving of….. DISPOSAL …..recycling emblem

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

12

PROBLEM AND SOLUTION Implication

●●●

PLASTIC FROM SHREDDED HULKS

+

PLASTIC FUEL TANKS

Current burden on recycling industry

Increasing burden on recycling industry in the future

● Disposal problem ● Jeopardizes current auto recycling process

Solution

●●●

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

Steel tanks 13

EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS Vehicle Emissions California Air Resources Board (CARB)

● ● ● Lower evaporative emissions required to reduce air

pollution.

● ● ● ● ● stringent requirements for certification of

gasoline powered autos

y Low EXHAUST emissions y Low EVAPORATIVE emissions « y DURABLE (15 years or 150,000 miles)

All required for certification as a Partial Zero Emission Vehicle (PZEV)

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

14

EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS Evaporative Emissions

HDPE PLASTIC TANKS

Permeable to gasoline hydrocarbons

STEEL TANKS Impermeable to gasoline hydrocarbons

Key Requirement Partial Zero Emission Vehicle (PZEV) certification by California Air Resources Board (CARB)

No PZEV certifications for plastic tank vehicles

Multiple PZEV certifications for steel tank vehicles

Steel is the material of choice for tanks on PZEV vehicles

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

15

EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS Steel Fuel Tanks . . . the choice for PZEV vehicles

Company Ford

Model Year

CARB PZEV certified vehicles for 2005 Model Name/Type Emission Rating

Tank Material

2005 2005

Escape – Hybrid Focus – Wagon - 2X3 - 2X4 - 2X5

ATPZEV PZEV PZEV PZEV PZEV

Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel

2004 2004

Sebring – Sedan Stratus – Sedan

PZEV PZEV

Steel Steel

2005 2005 2005

325CI – Coupe 325I – Sedan 325I - Wagon

PZEV PZEV PZEV

Steel Steel Steel

2004 2004 2004

Civic – Hybrid Accord – EX Sedan Accord – LX Sedan

ATPZEV PZEV PZEV

Steel Steel Steel

2005

Elantra – GLS & GT

PZEV

Steel

2004

Mazda 3

PZEV

Steel

2004

Galant DE & ES2.4L

PZEV

Steel

2004 2004

Altima 2.5, 2.55, 2.55L Sentra 1.8, 1.85

PZEV PZEV

Steel Steel

2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004

Legacy 2.5 GT Sedan Legacy 2.5 GT Wagon Legacy L Sedan Legacy L Wagon Outback Ltd Sedan Outback Ltd Wagon

PZEV PZEV PZEV PZEV PZEV PZEV

Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel

2004 2004

Camry LE, SE or XLE Prius - Hybrid

PZEV ATPZEV

2004

Jetta – Sedan GL/GLS 2.0

PZEV

Steel

2004 2004

S60 2.4 Sesdan V70 2.4 Wagon

PZEV PZEV

Steel Steel

DaimlerChrysler

BMW

California Air Resources Board: ― Certified gasoline PZEV models ● 14 in 2003 ● 23 in 2004 ● 29 in 2005

Honda

Hyundai Mazda Mitsubishi Nissan

Subaru

Toyota Steel Steel / plastic bladder

Volkswagen

Volvo

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

16

EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS PZEV – most important for California vehicle sales

Vehicle sales per year

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

17

EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS Other states to follow California requirements

● ● ● will increase PZEV vehicles

2 1.8

Vehicle 1.6 sales per year 1.4 (millions)

Other States California

1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Year

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

18

OVERVIEW Overview Comparison Plastic Tanks

Steel Tanks

Recycling Process

y Pilot process demonstrated in Europe. y Economically unfeasible to recycle. y No infrastructure in place .

y Existing auto recycling infrastructure. y Effectiveness of infrastructure jeopardized by growth of plastics .

Recycling Cost

y Cost for disposal — Landfill — Incineration

y Recycling is profitable and sustaining.

CARB Evaporative Emissions Standards

y No certified PZEV vehicles having plastic tanks.

y Multiple certified PZEV vehicles having steel tanks y Broader application of CARB standards in the future?

Green steel . . . . . . clean cars www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

19

SUMMARY

Summary ●

Steel fuel tanks for automobiles have environmental advantages — —



proven recycling using an existing, for profit infrastructure able to provide low evaporative emissions

Continued growth of plastic fuel tanks will — — —



jeopardize the existing automotive recycling process require substantial landfill or incineration incur end-of-life costs

SASFT and AISI will continue to communicate the environmental benefits of steel fuel tanks

www.autosteel.org

SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)

20

w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g

Great Designs in Steel is Sponsored by: •AK Steel Corporation •Mittal Steel Company •Severstal North America Inc. •Dofasco Inc. w w•Nucor w . aCorporation u t o s t e e l •United . o r g States Steel Corporation SAS GDISS 3_9_05 Final(2)