Energy Management Action Plan Template (This is a summary of the detailed energy management action plan guidelines, which is also available)

Date:

June 5, 2001

Date registered as Energy Innovator:11/14/2000

Organization Name: Address:

North West Catholic School Division #16 9301 – 19th Ave North Battleford, SK S9A 3N5

Key Contact: Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-mail:

G. Paul Baskey (306) 445-6158 (306) 445-3993 [email protected]

Energy Management Goals and Objectives 1) Reduce energy consumption within the North West Catholic School Division; 2) Reduce operating costs associated with utility energy consumption; 3) Enhance the classroom learning environment for our students and staff (increased comfort conditions and improve the lighting to IES standards; 4) Implement Destination Conservation that will improve energy awareness in the overall school environment by effectively involving students and staff; and 5) To be an effective leader of energy awareness within our City by showing and teaching the benefits of environmental awareness. Energy Consumption, Cost and CO2 Targets 1) By implementing this energy management program, the North West Catholic School Division can reduce energy costs by an estimated 17.3% or $44,000; 2) We can reduce the amount of CO2 by as much as 325.63 tonnes; 3) Electricity consumption will reduce by 287,000 kWh and natural gas will be reduced by an estimated 1,625 GJ 4) There are also additional water savings within our energy management program that have not been accounted for in the following table, but will also benefit the environment by utilizing less water in our daily activities; and 5) All energy consumption, current costs, and CO2 target have been based on an annual year.

Energy Consumption and Costs Please refer to the Excel table provided for the energy savings over the next ten years.

Baseline 1999

Current 1999

Target 2002 (forward)

Summary – Totals 2 Area (m ) Total Annual Energy Cost ($) Total Annual Energy Consumption (equivalent GJ) Total Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

23,029.54 $253,785 25,201.59 2344.93

23,029.54 $253,785 25,201.59 2344.93

23,029.54 $209,785 22,543.45 2,019.3

Electricity Annual Electricity Costs ($) Annual Electricity Consumption (kWh) Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

$171,673 1,624928 1,389.31

$171,673 1,624928 1,389.31

$137,673 1,337,928 1,143.92

Natural Gas Annual Natural Gas Costs ($) Annual Gas Consumption (GJ) Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

$82,112 19,352.3 955.62

$82,112 19,352.3 955.62

$72,112 17,727.3 875.38

Fuel Oil Annual Oil Costs ($) Annual Oil Consumption (GJ) Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

Other (specify)________________________ Annual Costs ($) Annual Consumption (GJ) Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

Year

Explanation of Baseline Consumption and Cost Data The following is a description of how the baseline data were selected, including why the baseline was selected and any other assumptions that were made:

1) The baseline data was selected to show the annual energy consumption and related utility costs for the North West Catholic School Division over a one-year period. 2) The 1999 Base Year was the most current utility information (based on the January to December calendar year) for the North West School Division before any performance contract discussions took place between SaskPower Energy Solutions and ourselves. 3) There have been no major changes within the School Division since the Base Year 1999; therefore we assumed that the current energy consumption will be the same as the Base Year 1999 energy consumption. Explanation of Forecasted Consumption and Cost Data The following is a description of the methodology used in forecasting utility data, including the assumptions made:

1) SaskPower Energy Solutions uses the METRIX utility accounting and tracking software program to model energy consumption to billings days, heating degree days, and cooling degree days. This modeling program can also calculate the changes utility rate structures and helps with identifying future energy consumption and costs. 2) SaskPower Energy Solutions also utilizes 30 year normalized weather data to forecast heating and ventilation savings associated with all measures.

Past and Current Projects and Actions Project

Lighting Delamping Program Classroom Window Replacement Program Performance Contracting Preliminary Study and Feasibility Analysis

Destination Conservation Energy Awareness Program

Implementation Date

Project Cost

Energy Consumption Savings (GJ) 450 GJ

$8,500

$3,000 per year

15 to 25 GJ per year

$100 to 150

Once project is implemented savings are an estimated $44,000 Estimated savings around $5,000.

Estimated Date January 1995 Ongoing process started January 1996 Started October 2000

$50,000

$40,000

Not implemented as of yet, potentially can save 2,600 GJ

Scheduled stared date September 2001

$7,000

Not implemented, but savings can be from 5% to 7% of total energy use (approx.200GJ)

Cost Savings ($)

Proposed (Future) Projects and Actions Project

Classroom Window Replacement Program Full DDC controls on the John Paul school Roof Replacement at St. Mary’s and building envelop upgrades to the school

Implementation Date

Project Cost

Energy Consumption Savings (GJ) 15 to 25 GJ per year

Cost Savings ($)

Ongoing process started January 1996 2005

$3,000 per year $150,000

200 to 300 GJ

$5,000 to 6,000

2010

$300,000

150 to 175 GJ

$4000 to $5000

$100 to 150

Training, Communication and Awareness Programs The following is a description of staff training on energy management and climate change:

The North West School Division strongly believes that an energy management program is only as effective as the communication, training, and awareness that it provides the end users (the students and staff of the School Division). One the main reasons that North West entered into an energy management program with SaskPower Energy Solutions is that they can provide the technical expertise to implement this type of program, along with bringing a proven and effective training and energy awareness program called “Destination Conservation”. SaskPower Energy Solutions is working with Destination Conservation (DC) to bring environmental and energy saving educational programs to school divisions in Saskatchewan. Destination Conservation’s involvement greatly enhances the effectiveness of an energy management program. DC provides the perfect complement to the technology based energy performance contracting program. In Saskatchewan, DC is provided by the Saskatchewan Environmental Society, a notfor-profit environmental organization based in Saskatoon. The following is a description of the organization's response to climate change:

The rising costs of energy and increasing utility budgets have made the area of energy

awareness as much more important issue for the North West Catholic School Division. With more interest placed on energy use, this shows how much energy we consumed in our normal every day activities. Being the energy resources are limited and reviewing the harmful to our environment, we must do our part to address climate change and decrease energy consumption where possible. By implementing the technical energy management program through SaskPower Energy Solutions where can reduce our energy consumption and address climate change. Now implementing Destination Conservation, as part of this energy management program, allows the North West Catholic School to educate the staff, students, and parents concerning climate change and energy awareness. This allows the North West Catholic School Division to be an energy awareness leader within the community. The following is a description of the organization's communication and awareness programs:

Under the SaskPower Energy Solutions performance contract, the North West Catholic School Division can improve our communication and energy awareness through the DC program by reaching the staff, students, and parents associated with the School Division. The overall definition of Destination Conservation is as follows: Destination Conservation is a practical, student-driven, activity-based program that brings environmental education alive in schools. A co-operative team of students, teachers, principals, custodians and parents work together with Destination Conservation partners in this three-year program. It is designed to increase sustainability by helping schools conserve resources and protect the environment. DC helps students and staff save energy, conserve water and reduce waste. Past experience has shown that the DC program of environmental education typically contributes about 6-7% of the savings achieved by school divisions in energy management programs, while providing a foundation for energy awareness in our leaders of the future. Reporting, Verifying and Updating the Action Plan and Targets As part of the reporting, North West Catholic School Division No. 16 will review and verify its targets. If discrepancies arise, the data will be modified and initiatives will be recommended to resolve the issues. The monitoring, tracking, and reporting will include the following:

1) As part of the performance contract, SaskPower Energy Solutions guarantees the performance of all energy conservation measures implemented under this performance contract. 2) Annual measurement and verification report will be presented by SaskPower Energy Solutions utilizing the “Whole Building Approach” or the “Retrofit Isolation Approach” (both methodologies have been approved by industry standards) to prove and track the on going results of the program. 3) If there are problems within the program, SaskPower Energy Solutions will modify or address the potential problems, and if necessary, install additional energy conservation measures to ensure that performance of our energy management program is realized.

APPENDICES APPENDIX A – NWRCSSD FACILITIES (Page 21) APPENDIX B – ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (Page 23) APPENDIX C – LONG TERM SAVINGS GOALS (Page 25) APPENDIX D – MEASUREMENT & VERIFICATION (Page 28)

Page 1 of 12

APPENDIX A Description of NWRCSSD’s Facilities Seven of NWRCSSD’s facilities were investigated to determine the potential of implementing energy conservation measures. The facilities investigated within this Energy Master Plan are listed below: • Division/Board Office (built in 1978) • Ecole Notre Dame (built in 1976) • Holy Family School (built in 1965) • John Paul II Collegiate (built in 1986) • St. George’s School (built in 1954) • St. Mary’s Community School (built in 1962) • St. Peter’s School (built in 1959) All of the facilities shown in the list above, with the exception of St. George’s School and St. Peter’s School, are located within the City of North Battleford. St. George’s School is located in the community of Wilkie; meanwhile St. Peter’s School is located in the community of Unity (all facilities are located in the province of Saskatchewan). Division/Board Office This 4,800-ft2 facility houses the North West Catholic School Division offices. At present, this facility consists of several individual offices and general administrative areas that are utilized by employees, directors, superintendents, and board members working for the School Division. These office areas occupy most of the existing floor plan with the Division office. In addition to this general office space, the remaining floor plan is utilized as a workshop area by building operators and custodial staff. At present, there are 13 full time NWRCSSD employees that work in this facility. Ecole Notre Dame Ecole Notre Dame is located 1241-105th Street within the City of North Battleford and is the smallest educational facility within NWRCSSD, encompassing an area of only 21,768 ft2. This kindergarten to grade seven facility serves the entire City of North Battleford with its French Immersion program. At present, this educational facility has an enrollment of 199 students, along with 15 teachers and supporting staff. Holy Family School Holy Family School is the second largest NWRCSSD educational facility and is located at 9201 19th Avenue within the City of North Battleford. This 33,142-ft2 educational facility houses 404 students, ranging from kindergarten to grade seven, along with 35 teachers and supporting staff members. John Paul II Collegiate

Page 2 of 12

John Paul II Collegiate is the largest educational facility encompassing an area just over 100,000 ft2 and the only secondary school facility within the School Division. This grade eight to twelve facility is located on the west side of the City of North Battleford at 1491-97th Street. At present, this facility serves the communities of Wilkie and Unity, along with the City of North Battleford and has an enrollment of 779 students, along with 58 teachers and supporting staff. John Paul II Collegiate also supports a wide variety of programs, including Industrial Arts, Fine Arts, Alternate Education, Native Studies, and a French Immersion program. St. George’s School St. George’s School is a K-9 educational facility that serves the community of Wilkie, Saskatchewan. This 26,098-ft2 facility provides the educational needs of 128 students with the help of 13 teachers and supporting staff.

Page 3 of 12

St. Mary’s Community School St Mary’s School is the third largest school within the School Division encompassing an area just over 32,658 ft2, just slightly larger than Holy Family School. Located at 1352- 110th Street, St Mary’s School supports 224 students, along with 35 teachers. All kindergarten to grade seven students residing on the East Side of the City of North Battleford, and not attending the Ecole Notre Dame facility, attend St Mary’s School. St. Peter’s School St. Peter’s School is a K-7 educational facility that serves the community of Unity, Saskatchewan. This 24,934-ft2 facility provides the educational needs of 199 students with the help of 22 teachers and supporting staff.

Page 4 of 12

APPENDIX B Environmental Impact

Environmental concerns influence many business decisions in today’s world. Energy conservation goes hand in hand with protecting our environment. By implementing this project, NWRCSSD will contribute to reducing the emissions of pollutants associated with power generation and the burning of fossil fuels. NWRCSSD will also reduce SOx and NOx emissions, which are noted by the Environmental Protection Agency as Criteria Air Contaminants or "principle air pollutants that pose a direct threat to peoples health". Table A.1 lists the Saskatchewan average emission rates per kWh generated and MMBtu of Fuel burned. This data was compiled using historical information maintained by SaskPower. The rates are based on the average emissions over the four years from 1995 to 1998 inclusive. Gas emission rates are based upon documented EPA figures for burning natural gas Table A.2 summarizes the estimated reduction of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide and sulphur dioxide emissions resulting from implementation of the energy conservation measures proposed under this contract. Table A.1

Chemical Pollutants

Pollutant Emissions

Emissions Rate Per Energy Unit Electricity Natural Gas (kWh) (MMBtu)

Environmental Effect

Carbon Dioxide, CO2

855 grams

52.1 kilograms

Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming

Nitrogen Oxide, NOx

2.2 grams

0.23 grams

Acid Rain, Smog

Sulphur Dioxide, SO2

5.3 grams

177 grams

Acid Rain

Table A.2 Projected Pollutants Reduction per Annum

Pollutant Carbon Dioxide, CO2 [kilograms] Nitrogen Oxide, NOx [kilograms]

Page 5 of 12

Current

Emissions Projected

Reduction

2,344,939

1,967,638

377,301

3,530

2,906

624

Sulphur Dioxide, SO2 [kilograms]

Page 6 of 12

11,842

9,876

1,967

Figure A.1 2,500

Environmental Impact During 1999 Projected

2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Carbon Dioxide - tonnes

Nitrogen Oxides - 10's of kilograms

Sulphur Oxides - 10's of kilograms

As a result of this program, emissions attributable to the operation of NWRCSSD’s facilities will be reduced by 377.3 tonnes of CO2, 0.623 tonnes of NO2, and 1.97 tonnes of SO2 emissions per year.

Page 7 of 12

Page 8 of 12

Fuel Oil Annual Oil Costs ($) Annual Oil

Natural Gas Annual Natural Gas Costs ($) Annual Gas Consumption (GJ) Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

Electricity Annual Electricity Costs ($) Annual Electricity Consumption (kWh) Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

Summary – Totals Area (m2) Total Annual Energy Cost ($) Total Annual Energy Consumption (equivalent GJ) Total Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

Year

Current 1999

Target 2002

Target 2003 Year 1

Target 2004 Year 2

Target 2005 Year 3

Target 2006 Year 4

Target 2007 Year 5

Target 2008 Year 6

Target 2009 Year 7

Target 2010 Year 8

Target 2011 Year 9

Target 2012 Year 10

$171,673

2344.93

$137,673

2,019.30

$140,426

2,019.30

$143,235

2,019.30

$146,100

2,019.30

$149,022

2,019.30

$152,002

2,019.30

$155,042

2,019.30

$158,143

2,019.30

$161,306

2,019.30

$164,532

2,019.30

$167,823

2,019.30

955.62

955.62

N/A N/A

19,352

19,352

N/A N/A

$82,112

1,389.31

$82,112

1,389.31

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$72,112

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$73,554

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$75,025

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$76,526

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$78,056

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$79,617

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$81,210

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$82,834

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$84,491

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$86,181

1,143.92

N/A N/A

875.38

17,727

$87,904

1,143.92

1,624,928 1,624,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928 1,337,928

$171,673

2344.93

25,201.59 25,201.59 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45 22,543.45

23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 23,029.54 $253,785 $253,785 $209,785 $213,981 $218,260 $222,626 $227,078 $231,620 $236,252 $240,977 $245,797 $250,712 $255,727

Baseline 1999

2005 and beyond Energy Reduction Targets

APPENDIX C

N/A N/A N/A

N/A

N/A

Current 1999

N/A N/A

N/A

Baseline 1999

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2002

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2003 Year 1

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2004 Year 2

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2005 Year 3

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2006 Year 4

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2007 Year 5

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2008 Year 6

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2009 Year 7

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2010 Year 8

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2011 Year 9

Annual Energy Consumption in GJ has only been weather adjusted for the 1999, all subsequent annual utility consumption is also based on 1999 weather information. Additional Energy savings are based on the proposed actions and projects that the North West Catholic School Division are looking at implementing in the future.

Page 9 of 12

• •

Annual Costs ($) Annual Consumption (GJ) Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

Consumption (GJ) Annual CO2 Emissions, if known (tonnes)

Year

N/A

N/A N/A

N/A

Target 2012 Year 10

18,000

20,000

22,000

24,000

26,000

Page 10 of 12

2010

Ongoing process started January 1996 2005

Implementation Date

$300,000

$150,000

$3,000 per year

Project Cost

150 to 175 GJ

200 to 300 GJ

Energy Consumption Savings (GJ) 15 to 25 GJ per year

$4000 to $5000

$5,000 to 6,000

$100 to 150

Cost Savings ($)

Baseline

Year

Retrofit

ar 99 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 e Y 19 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Future Energy Management Utility Savings

Roof Replacement at St. Mary’s and building envelop upgrades to the school

Full DDC controls on the John Paul school

Classroom Window Replacement Program

Project

Proposed (Future) Projects and Actions

Annual Energy Consumption (GJ)

APPENDIX D (for additional information on baseline weather adjustments refer the Honeywell Building Energy Report, dated November 2000)

Measurement and Verification Overview

All Energy Performance Contracts require the development of an energy baseline, a projection of savings, the financial assumption of the risk for program results, and the credible demonstration of the guaranteed savings through direct measurement and/or periodic Utility and Operational Cost Savings reconciliation reports. Baseline Definition

SaskPower uses the following definition of a baseline: “The cost baseline is a calculation of the cost of each utility (gas, water, steam, electricity, etc.) that would have been consumed in existing facilities, if the contractor had not installed proposed energy conservation measures, or had not recommended the switch to a lower utility cost alternative. It is derived from a previous baseline period in which the cost of each utility type, determined from the consumption of each utility, is either physically measured or calculated from measurement.” M&V Methods

Performance of Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs), such as those proposed in this Concept Report, refers to the amount of utility savings, which are generated from implementation of the ECMs. The guaranteed savings performance of the combined energy conservation measures forms the basis and foundations of an Energy Performance Contract. Measurement and Verification of the performance of ECMs can be accomplished by various methods. Selection of the most efficient method to be used for each measure requires consideration of multiple factors. The factors include: • Type of utility affected; • Magnitude of savings as compared to total utility usage; • Complexity of the measure itself; • Accuracy to which the performance must be determined; and • Cost and willingness of NWRCSSD to document changes within their facilities. There are two approved distinctive methods for verification of a Performance Contract: Retrofit Isolation Approach: In this method, the performance of each measure is verified independently. The subsystem on which the measure operates is isolated, and its utility use before and after implementation of the measure is evaluated. Subsystem utility use is determined by observation of physical variables such as current, voltage, power, volume and time. Engineering formulae are used to determine pre and post retrofit utility usage, and cost avoidance. Energy consumed by most building subsystems can be isolated - analyzed independently from other facility systems. Examples include energy efficient lighting retrofit, ventilation controls, boiler plant upgrades and chiller plant upgrades. Although they interact with other subsystems, utility usage can be determined by direct measurement of physical variables. This method does not rely on identifying macro effects on utility bills by statistical analysis. Page 11 of 12

Subsystem utility usage before and after implementation of ECMs is obtained by analysis of physical data collected using a variety of tools and procedures including: • Energy Management System data acquisition feature • Portable data acquisition equipment • Metering and recording equipment • Maintenance logs In each case the sample points, measured variables, measurement methods and engineering analyses selected should accurately reflect subsystem operation, and conform to current ASHRAE1 and NEMVP2 methods. Once proven the utility savings are deemed for the guarantee period. This method is more accurate, typically less expensive and eliminates the ongoing need for the customer to document and supply equipment and operational changes to SaskPower. For these reasons, this method is becoming increasingly more popular in the industry. Whole Building Approach: In this method, utility bills before and after the ECMs installation are compared. Utility accounting software (such as Metrix or Faser) is used to analyze billing information and pre and post installation usage patterns. The difference is avoided cost, or savings, due entirely to the performance of the installed ECMs. In order to be accurate, this method must account for operational changes in the facility that affects utility consumption. This method is dependent upon the customer tracking and providing SaskPower with ongoing equipment and operational changes in their facilities so that savings can be accurately determined. This method is substantially more expensive as it requires ongoing administration and becomes increasingly difficult to monitor when there are manpower changes in the customer or SaskPower’s organization. Savings Reports

The Utility and Operational Savings report (U&OS), quantifying utility and operational savings achieved by NWRCSSD from implementation of the ECMs, will be prepared by SaskPower at the end of each year and presented within two months of year end. This report will contain the full results of Retrofit Isolation verification of the lighting and mechanical ECM’s.

1

ASHRAE – American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers. NEMVP - North American Energy Measurement and Verification Protocol. Page 12 of 12 2

BUILDING ENERGY REPORT

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16

August 2000

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16 Building Energy Report Contents A.1

Current Energy Use

A.2

Utility Map A.2.1 Electricity, Natural Gas and Water

A.3

Utility Rates A.3.1 Electricity Rates A.3.2 Natural Gas Rates A.3.3 Water Rates

Confidential

2

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16

Current Energy Use

Confidential

3

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16

A.1 CURRENT ENERGY USE Utility records for the period January 1999 to December 1999 have been analyzed using the SRC Metrix Utility Accounting System, which correlates utility consumption with heating and cooling degree-days. This information assists in identifying areas of significant utility cost savings, and in establishing the Base Year Use. Utility and Cost Summary Table A.1a below summarizes the annualized utility consumption and costs for the Base Year period (Calendar Year 1999). Municipal Taxes are included in the costs; GST has been excluded. Table A.1a: 1999 Annual Utility and Cost Summary Building Electricity Natural Gas Water Total Num Name kWh kW $ m³ ekWh $ m³ $ ekWh $ COF Central Office 32,771 3,038 14,448 152,954 2,524 298 361 184,475 5,923 HFS Holy Family 205,486 1,249 24,938 75,441 798,640 12,285 1,842 1,931 997,617 39,154 JPC John Paul Collegiate 866,779 4,175 93,775 186,791 1,977,423 28,787 5,761 4,583 2,828,085 127,145 NDS Notre Dame 137,554 627 11,839 68,604 716,394 11,193 549 628 857,896 23,660 SGS St George 92,586 8,125 60,071 630,745 9,827 1,057 1,484 723,332 19,436 SMC St. Mary Community 199,858 1,086 22,315 66,540 696,759 10,863 2,569 2,139 898,528 35,317 SPS St Peter 89,895 501 7,644 40,112 420,021 6,633 1,877 1,347 511,071 15,624 Total 1,624,929 7,638 171,674 512,007 5,392,936 82,112 13,953 12,473 7,001,003 266,259

Energy Intensity Table A.1b summarizes the energy and cost intensity of NWRCSD 16. Table A.1b: 1999 Building Energy and Cost Intensity Building Electricity 2 Name Area ft kWh/ft2 $/ft2 Central Office 4,800 Holy Family 33,142 John Paul Collegiate 104,488 Notre Dame 21,768 St George 26,098 St. Mary Community 32,658 St Peter 24,934

Confidential

6.9 6.2 8.2 6.3 3.6 6.0 3.6

0.63 0.75 0.90 0.54 0.31 0.68 0.31

Natural Gas ekWh/ft2 $/ft2 31.9 24.1 18.9 32.9 24.2 21.3 16.8

4

0.53 0.37 0.28 0.51 0.38 0.33 0.27

Water $/ft2 L/ft 2

61.7 54.8 55.9 25.8 40.5 76.9 75.3

0.08 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.05

Total ekWh/ft2 $/ft2 38.7 30.3 27.1 39.2 27.7 27.4 20.5

1.23 1.18 1.22 1.09 0.74 1.08 0.63

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16

Utility Map

Confidential

5

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16

A.2 UTILITY MAP Meter Code Numbers have been assigned to each meter, and will be used throughout the project to identify utility accounts. Table A.2a: Project Utility Map Building Name Central Office Central Office Central Office Holy Family School Holy Family School Holy Family School John Paul Collegiate John Paul Collegiate John Paul Collegiate Notre Dame School Notre Dame School Notre Dame School St George School St George School St George School St George School St. Mary Community School St. Mary Community School St. Mary Community School St Peter School St Peter School St Peter School

Confidential

Utility Type Electricity Natural Gas Water Electricity Natural Gas Water Electricity Natural Gas Water Electricity Natural Gas Water Electricity Electricity Natural Gas Water Electricity Natural Gas Water Electricity Natural Gas Water

Meter Code COF E1 COF G1 COF W1 HFS E1 HFS G1 HFS W1 JPC E1 JPC G1 JPC W1 NDS E1 NDS G1 NDS W1 SGS E1 SGS E2 SGS G1 SGS W1 SMC E1 SMC G1 SMC W1 SPS E1 SPS G1 SPS W1

6

Account Number 00-0951-01265-00-01 11-0951-01265-00-01 118-2353050-301 00-0951-00067-01-01 11-0951-01181-01-01 118-2722007-301 00-0951-01587-01-01 11-0951-01587-03-01 197-1516509-304 00-0951-04141-00-01 11-0951-04141-00-01 205-1234509-302 00-0846-00398-00-01 00-0846-00399-00-01 11-0846-00399-00-01 1078-0 00-0951-07168-02-01 11-0951-05826-03-01 310-2508000-103 00-0790-00585-00-01 11-0790-00585-00-01 1140

Utility Name SaskPower SaskEnergy City of New Battleford SaskPower SaskEnergy City of New Battleford SaskPower SaskEnergy City of New Battleford SaskPower SaskEnergy City of New Battleford SaskPower SaskPower SaskEnergy Town of Wilkie SaskPower SaskEnergy City of New Battleford SaskPower SaskEnergy Town of Unity

Rate Mun. Tax E85 10% G02 5% E95 G02

10% 5%

E95 G03

10% 5%

E85 G02

10% 5%

E85 E85 G02

5% 5% 5%

E95 G02

10% 5%

E85 G02

5% 5%

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16

Utility Rates

Confidential

7

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16

A.3 UTILITY RATES A.3.1 Electricity Rates Refer to Table A.2.1a for a list of utility accounts and the respective utility and rate structure. SaskPower Electricity and Demand Charges The following rate structures apply to the various buildings. The rates became effective January 1, 1996, and are still in effect through 2000. Small changes have been made to the basic monthly charge as of April 2000. For municipal taxes on particular meters, please see Table A.2.1a. Table A.3.1a shows the applicable rate structures. Provincial Sales Tax is currently at 6% for all Electricity Accounts down from 7% before March 27th 2000. Table A.3.1a: SaskPower Electricity Rates Demand $/kVA Rate

Small Public Facility E85 Large Public Facility E95

Confidential

Basic Monthly Charge $13.75 $19.40

8

First 50 kVA

Balance kVA

$0.00 $0.00

$12.75 $12.75

Consumption $/kWh First 10,000 kWh $0.0766 $0.0852

Balance kWh $0.0327 $0.0327

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16 A.3.2 Natural Gas Rates Refer to Table A.2.1a for a list of utility accounts and the respective utility and rate structure. SaskEnergy Natural Gas Charges The following rate structures apply to the various buildings. Table A.3.2a shows the rates for all SaskEnergy meters. For municipal taxes on particular meters, please see Table A.2.1a. Table A.3.2a shows the applicable rate structures. There are no Provincial sales taxes charged to gas accounts. Table A.3.2a: SaskPower Natural Gas Rates

Rate Class & Blocks General Service G02 Basic Monthly Charge Energy Charge - $/m3 General Service G03 100,000 to 660,000 m3 per year Basic Monthly Charge Energy Charge - $/m3

Confidential

9

Rate Effective Date Nov 1, 1998 Dec 15, 1999 $17.00 $0.1524

$17.00 $0.1741

$37.25 $0.1444

$37.25 $0.1661

North West Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 16 A.3.3 Water Rates Refer to Table A.2.1a for a list of utility accounts and the respective utility and rate structure. City of North Battleford Table A.3.3a: City of North Battleford Water Rate Actual Rates Water

Sewer

Unit Cost $/m3 First 100 m3 $0.75 Next 400 m3 $0.64 Next 2,000 m3 $0.53 Balance m3 $0.42 60% of Water Charge in $

Town of Unity Table A.3.3b: Town of Unity Water Rate Actual Rates

Charges

Minimum Charge First 6,000 Gal Above 6,000 Gallons Per 1,000 Gal Sewer Fixed

$33.00 $2.47 $72.60

Town of Wilkie Table A.3.3c: Town of Wilkie Water Rate

Confidential

Actual Rates

Charges

Water Base Water Per 1,000 Gal Sewer Base Sewer Per 1,000 Gal

$11.00 $3.16 $3.50 $1.00

10