ELECTRO-MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT – SELECTION, BEST PRACTICE AND USE OF CHECKLISTS CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION
1
2
TURBINES
2
2.1 TURBINES TYPE 2.2 ARRANGEMENT 2.2.1 AXIS ARRANGEMENT 2.2.2 BEARING ARRANGEMENT 2.3 NUMBER OF UNITS 2.4 GEARBOX 2.5 EXPECTED ENERGY OF THE PROJECT 2.6 MAIN TURBINE TYPES: DRAWINGS AND PICTURES
2 5 5 5 6 6 6 7
3
GENERATORS
14
4
GEARBOXES
15
5
VALVES
16
6
ELECTRIC PANELS
17
7
ADDITIONAL REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS
18
8
REFERENCES
19
1
Introduction The main choices for the SHP electromechanical equipments are related to the following topics. 1. Turbine 2. Gear 3. Generator 4. Gates and valves 5. Control panels 6. Switch boards 7. Transformers 8. Crane 9. Screen cleaner In the present paper we discuss only the first 4 items, which constitute the more relevant ones.
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 1
2
Turbines The turbines are the heart of the hydroelectric plants, as they transform the hydraulic energy in the mechanical one, which is a more easily usable form of energy. The choice about the turbines is related to: • type; • arrangement; • number of units; • gear; • expected energy of the project: • others peculiar aspects of the designed plant. The table resumes the above mentioned items and the main factors involved in the choice. In the following chapters each item will be discussed more deeply. Factors
2.1
Type
H; Qmax; Qmin
Arrangement
Power station; maintenance facilities
Nr. units
Qmin
Gear
Rotation speed; cost
Expected energy
Total investment
Others
Transport facilities; delivery time; waterhammer problems, etc.
Turbines type In the long history of the hydroelectric technology, a small number of turbine types survived to the field tests, so the choice is practically restricted in a small list, depending from the net head (H) and the rated flow (Q) of the installation. Although each turbine is designed taking into consideration both head and flow rate - which are the nominal data of the machine - a first classification is traditionally given by the head only. Turbine Type Impulse
Head Classification High (>50m)
Medium (10-50m)
Low (3.000 kW
Oil
Both
1.000 - 3.000 kW
Oil
Number of units The number of units basically depends of the design minimum flow which we want to exploit in efficient and safe (from the equipment point of view) way. Each turbine type has a typical range. Turbine type
Acceptance of Q variation
Acceptance of H variation
Pelton 1 jet
20% Qmax
Low
Pelton multi-jet
10% Qmax
Low
Francis
50% Qmax
Low
Kaplan double regulated
20% Qmax
High
Kaplan single regulated
50% Qmax
Medium
Cross-flow
20% Qmax
Medium
Qmax
Low
Propeller 2.4
Gearbox The gear is a device installed between the turbine and generator increasing the rotation speed of the generator in order to reduce its cost. Form the other side, the total unit efficiency decreases of a couple of point at least and the maintenances are more expensive and difficult, especially in the vertical axis arrangement. Moreover the gearbox usually increases the noise of the unit in a significant way. Additional details on the gearbox are presented in the § 0.
2.5
Expected energy of the project The plant performance, as annual energy production, is directly connected with the unit expected efficiency, which could be a choice parameter. Turbine type
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Best efficiency
Kaplan single regulated
0.91
Kaplan double regulated
0.93
Francis
0.94
Pelton multi-jet
0.90
Pelton 1 jet
0.89
Turgo
0.85
Cross-flow
0.80
Section 3
Page 6
Moving from the design point (H and Q with the best efficiency), the turbine efficiency decreases following curves which are typical of each machine type [1].
2.6
Main turbine types: drawings and pictures In the following pages are presented drawings and pictures of typical arrangement of the main turbine types.
Main turbines types
Francis
Pelton
Kaplan
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 7
Pelton turbine
[1]
Multi-jet Pelton : vertical arrangement
3
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 8
Multi-jet Pelton: horizontal arrangement
4
Francis turbine: vertical arrangements
5
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 9
Francis turbine: horizontal arrangements
[5]
e6
Pelton inlet flow
Turgo inlet flow
t er je wat
Runner blades
[1]
NF-S3-RevA.doc
dle nee
Section 3
Page 10
Francis flow
Cross-flow (Banki) distributor
runner
blades
water flow
[1]
Francis and Banki horizontal arrangement
[5]
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 11
Kaplan turbine
[1]
Small Kaplan (1 MW) draft tube
[3]
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 12
Small Kaplan (1 MW) spiral case
[3]
Small Kaplan (1 MW) runner
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 13
3
Generators In comparison with the turbines, the generators of the SHP are usually a more standard product. Nevertheless some option is possible to better adjust the machine to the specific characteristics of the designed plant. The first choice is between the asynchronous (also called induction) generators and synchronous ones. Basically, the induction generators, which are less expensive and easier to manage, don’t have any own excitation device so they are suitable only for plant connected with large electric grid and under additional conditions, quoted in the table, where other options are represented. Type
Pi 3.000 kW
> 500 rpm
=
=
< 300 kW
every
Weekly
Low
Conical (bevel gear)
< 1.000 kW
every
Expensive
High
Parallel axis
< 3.000 kW
every
Cheap
High
No gear Belt
Although the gearboxes allow some money saving, we must not forget that they add an efficiency penalization to the generation unit. Type
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Efficiency
Belt
95%
Parallel
98%
Bevel gear
96%
Section 3
Page 15
5
Valves As they are very simple mechanical tools, the valves can play critical roles in the hydroelectric schemes both during the normal plant management and during extraordinary events. The table shows the main criteria in choosing the valves types. Type Gate
Head losses
Diameter [mm]
Pressure [m w.c.]
Cost
2
4m
Kaplan derived
3
200 m
Pelton (single jet or multi-jet)
100 - 200 m
Turgo; Pelton multi-jet
50 - 100
Cross-flow, Francis
In the Himalayan schemes, the basic option is the synchronous generators, as these plants generally work off-grid: the load control device is strongly recommended as much as possible.
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 18
8
References 1
Layman’s Guidebook on how to develop a small hydro site - ESHA - 2004 http://www.esha.be 2
IEC International Standard - http://www.iec.ch
3
KÖSSLER Ges.m.b.H. - http://www.koessler.com
4
Studio Frosio - http://www.studiofrosio.it
5
Cink Hydro-Energy k.s. - http://www.cink-hydro-energy.com
6
Andriz VA TECH HYDRO - http://www.andritz.com
NF-S3-RevA.doc
Section 3
Page 19