Effect of Axial Resolution on PET image data: 2D vs. 3D. Abstract:

Effect of Axial Resolution on PET image data: 2D vs. 3D TR Oakes1, JE Holden2,3, RW Pyzalski3, AD Roberts1,4, WD Brown3,2, RJ Nickles2, RJ Davidson1,4...
Author: Mabel Farmer
2 downloads 1 Views 474KB Size
Effect of Axial Resolution on PET image data: 2D vs. 3D TR Oakes1, JE Holden2,3, RW Pyzalski3, AD Roberts1,4, WD Brown3,2, RJ Nickles2, RJ Davidson1,4 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Depts. of Psychology1, Medical Physics2, Radiology3, Psychiatry4

Abstract: We compared 12 pairs of cerebral [18F]-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) 2D/3D image sets from a GE/Advance PET scanner, incorporating the actual corrections used on human subjects. FDG images were acquired as: 2D scan 50-80 min post-injection (PI); transmission scan 82-92 min PI, 3D scan 95-105 min PI. The emission countrate was

Suggest Documents