10/17/2014

1

Utilizing State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Data for High School Feedback Reports Ted Carter and Kelly Holder Kansas State Department of Education 2

EDUCATIONAL LANDSCAPE IN KANSAS

3

Educational Landscape in Kansas • Oversee 289 public school districts  Over 1,600 schools  Over 460,000 students • Combination of large vs. small districts; urban vs. rural • Elected Board of Education • Appointed Commissioner

4

Educational Landscape in Kansas • Local districts select SIS for maintaining data, and provide data to state based on collection and reporting calendar • KSDE maintains multiple data collection/reporting systems dealing with specific programs (migrant, sped, CTE, teacher licensure, educator assignments, school finance, etc.) • Systems/data integrated via MDM and enterprise design • Most systems are internally developed and maintained using Microsoft technologies •

5

HIGH SCHOOL FEEDBACK REPORTS - OVERVIEW

6

Purpose & Audience • Purpose - To provide information about a class of high school seniors including the number who matriculated to a postsecondary institution while noting how well they performed compared to their peers from the district and the state as a whole. • Audience - Principals and Superintendents –Created as a tool to inform and aid policy & decision makers

7

Platform • System For Education Enterprise in Kansas (SEEK) • SEEK is a BI solution using Sharepoint in Reporting Services Integrated mode, displaying a series of interactive reports with the ability to disaggregate by year, subgroup, and content type, additionally allowing drilldown to student level data. • All charts and underlying data exportable in .pdf, .xls, and .doc formats •

8

Platform - Authorization Roles • Building Details – Read Only - Individuals with this authorization role have the ability to view KPI’s for their specific building. • Org Details - Read Only - Individuals with this authorization role have the ability to view

1

10/17/2014

KPI’s at the district aggregate level and for each specific building within the district. • Org Aggregate – Read Only - Individuals with this authorization role have the ability to view district level Data Quality KPI’s • 9

SEEK

10

ARRA Metrics – SFSF Grant • The ARRA Metrics utilized for High School Feedback Reports:  C 11  C12  B (1) (3)  B (1) (4)  B (1) (10)  B (1) (11)  B (1) (12)

11

Kansas High School Feedback Reports The High School Feedback Report provides information about each high school and its graduates who: 1. Graduated from a Kansas High School (2007 – Present) 2. Entered a Public or Private university, in and out of the state of Kansas. (Data availability varies on metric selection) 3. Completed the ACT prior to Post – Secondary Enrollment. 2.

12

Kansas High School Feedback Reports The High School Feedback Report contains the following three sections. 1. College Attendance and Enrollment Patterns at All University types. 2. College Performance Patterns at In-State Public Universities and Colleges. 3. Additional Measures included as part of the America Competes Act for In-State Public Universities and Colleges. •

13

Kansas High School Feedback Reports What’s included? • College-going patterns of graduating high school seniors help document student transition. • Detailed student performance information, extracted from university student records, document high school graduate experience in through their collegiate career • State, District, and Building level information for all student performance measures are included for comparison. • Student level drilldown capabilities planned pending FERPA regulation changes.

14

Kansas High School Feedback Reports What’s not included?

2

10/17/2014

•

For public reporting, numbers are not displayed in cases where there are fewer than ten students.

•

Performance data is not available for all out-of-state institutions as well as private in-state institutions.

15

COLLEGE ATTENDANCE AND ENROLLMENT PATTERNS (C11)

16

SFSF Phase II Metrics - Defined • C (11) – Provide, for the State, for each LEA in the State, for each high school in the State and, at each of these levels, by student subgroup (consistent with section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA), of the students who graduate from high school consistent with 34 CFR 200.19(b)(1)(i), the number and percentage (including numerator and denominator) who enroll in an institution of higher education (IHE) (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA)) within 16 months of receiving a regular high school diploma.

17

College Attendance and Enrollment Patterns This section addresses the following questions about college enrollment of high school graduates: 1. How many graduates are included in this report by year? (Multiyear selections available for trend analysis) 2. What percentage of seniors enrolled in a Private or Public Post-Secondary Institution, within and out of the state of Kansas. 3. How much time elapsed between High School Graduation and Post–Secondary enrollment. (Default ≤ 525 Days) 4. Where did your high school graduates enroll? Listing by institution.

18

Default Screen – Superintendent/Principal Role

19

Building Drilldown – Superintendent/Principal Role

20

Where students are enrolling ?

21

Where students are enrolling ? – Trend Analysis (Planned)

22

By Subgroup • Disaggregation by 12 subgroups • Students may belong to only 1 Race/Ethnicity Subgroup • Students may belong to only 1 Gender Subgroup • All other subgroups are not mutually exclusive.

23 1

Subgroup Listing • Race/Ethnicity  White  Black  Hispanic  Asian  American Indian

3

10/17/2014

2

 Multiracial • Gender  Male  Female • Other Subgroups  Students with Disabilities  Free/Reduced Lunch  English Language Learners  Migrant 

24

Building A – By Subgroup

25

Subgroup Drilldown – White

26

COLLEGE PERFORMANCE PATTERNS (C12)

27

SFSF Phase II Metrics - Defined • C (12) - Provide, for the State, for each LEA in the State, for each high school in the State and, at each of these levels, by student subgroup (consistent with section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA), of the students who graduate from high school consistent with 34 CFR 200.19(b)(1)(i) who enroll in a public IHE (as defined in section 101(a) of the HEA) in the State within 16 months of receiving a regular high school diploma, the number and percentage (including numerator and denominator) who complete at least one year’s worth of college credit (applicable to a degree) within two years of enrollment in the IHE.

28

Default Screen – Superintendent/Principal Role

29 30

Cross Indicator Analysis – (Planned)

31

POST – SECONDARY PREPAREDNESS MEASURES (B1)

32

SFSF Phase II Metrics - Defined • B (1) - Indicate which of the 12 elements described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system.

33

SFSF Phase II Metrics - Defined • B (1) (3) - Student-level information about the points at which students exit, transfer in, transfer out, drop out, or complete P-16 education programs. • B (1) (4) - The capacity to communicate with higher education data systems. •

34

College Performance Patterns - Indicator B (1) (3) (4)

35

SFSF Phase II Metrics - Defined • B (1) (10) - Student-level college readiness test scores. • B (1) (11) - Data that provide information regarding the extent to which students transition

4

10/17/2014

successfully from secondary school to postsecondary education, including whether students enroll in remedial coursework. 36

College Performance Patterns - Indicator B (10)

37

College Performance Patterns - Indicator B (11)

38

College Performance Patterns - Indicator B (11)

39

SFSF Phase II Metrics - Defined • B (1) (12)- Data that provide other information determined necessary to address alignment and adequate preparation for success in postsecondary education

40

College Performance Patterns - Indicator B (12)

41

College Performance Patterns - Indicator B (12)

42

College Performance Patterns - Indicator B (10) • Additional Metrics (Planned) • Student Level data on ACT scores (composite and by subject) with corresponding remedial course work by subject including remedial course work passing rate. • Student Level ACT data comparing a students scores to State Benchmarks by subject. • Building, District, and State level comparisons for the above metrics.

43

• Additional Metrics (Planned) • Comparative Metrics from State assessments scores by subject, ACT and Post-Secondary Remedial Enrollment and Passing rates. • Teacher Level Drilldown for Building and District levels. • Secondary course enrollment drilldown for building, district, and state level. • Correlation analysis of student achievement tied to growth modeling. 44

For Additional Information • Ted Carter Applications Development Supervisor – KSDE (785) 296-3575 [email protected] • • Kelly Holder Data Analyst – KSDE (785) 291-3620 [email protected] •

5