Development of Composites Based on Natural Fibers

Development of Composites Based on Natural Fibers M.T. Ton-That & J. Denault Industrial Materials Institute The Institute of Textile Science Ottawa, O...
Author: Neal Stephens
0 downloads 1 Views 4MB Size
Development of Composites Based on Natural Fibers M.T. Ton-That & J. Denault Industrial Materials Institute The Institute of Textile Science Ottawa, ON April 13, 2007

Presentation outline Opportunities with natural fibres Challenges of natural fibre composites Canadian Natural Fibre Initiative on Flax and hemp fibre biocomposites Conclusions

Polymer Composites ‰ Polymer Composites = Reinforced Plastics ‰ Reinforcing phase ¾ Reinforcement usually has much greater mechanical properties and serves as the principal load-carrying members.

¾ Reinforcing effect determined by interface, aspect ratio, distribution and orientation ‰ The matrix ¾ Plays a role of a binder to keep the fibers in a desired location and orientation. ¾ Transfers load to the fiber through the fiber-matrix interface. ¾ Protects fiber from environmental damage.

‰ The fiber-matrix interface plays a decided role on the transformation of load from the matrix to the fiber. Composites are more favourable than plastics

Eco-Composites: Composites of The Future ‰ Respond to the needs of materials in the 21st century ¾ ¾ To To cope cope with with limitation limitation of of petroleum petroleum supply supply ¾ ¾ To To cope cope with with environmental environmental pollution pollution concern concern

‰ Economically favourable composites made of ¾ Sustainable ustainable crop-derived crop-derived plastics plastics ¾ ¾ Inexpensive Inexpensive crop-derived crop-derived fibres fibres as as reinforcement reinforcement

‰ Case of success ¾ ¾ Natural Natural fibers: fibers: wood, wood, hemp, hemp, flax, flax, kenaf kenaf ¾ ¾ Bio-based Bio-based polymer: polymer: PLA PLA from from corn corn and and sweet sweet potato potato

Attention: bio-based products are not always sustainable

Natural Fibres vs Synthetic Fibres ‰ Bast Fibres: Flax, Hemp, Kenaf, Abaca, Banana, Bamboo, Jute, Totora ‰ Leaf Fibres: Sisal, Curaua, Fique, Phormium, Palm trees, Caroa, Kurowa, Pineapple ‰ Seed Fibres: Cotton, Capok ‰ Fruit Fibres: Coir, African palm ‰ Wood Fibres: soft & hard wood

Natural fibres

100 80 Price (cent/lb) 60 40

Wood fiber

CaCO3

Natural fibers

0

Fiber glass

20

NF Composites in North American

NF composites market

Driving force: purely economic Million lb

‰ The market for NF composites in North America: mainly for construction ¾ 2000 = 200,000 tonnes ¾ 2005 = 3X

400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

Other natural fibers Wood fiber

1980

1990

2000

Construction applications Toronto Broad walk

Deck

Mighty Mount Rusmore

Play ground

Construction applications Siding and soffit products

Pool

Marina

NF composites in Europe Consummation in tone of natural fibres in automotive industry in Europe

Driving force: Government Legislation Recycling concerns being driven by EU regulations end of life vehicle disposal: Jan 1st, 2005: 80 wt%; Jan 1st, 2015: 85 wt% GHG emission limit and tax incentive

Automotive Parts Made of NF Composites ‰ Volkswagen: back of seats,door panels, trunk panels (Golf, Passat, Variant, Bora, Fox, Polo) ‰ Audi: back of seats, side panels, trunk covering, speakers holders (A2, A4, Avant, A6, A6 Avant, A8) ‰ BMW: door panels, headliners, trunk floor panel (Serie 3, 5 and 7) ‰ Daimler Chrysler: door panels, business tables, padding-pillars reinforcing, dashboard parts (Class A, C, E and S) ‰ Opel: headliners, door panels, dashboard parts (Astra, Vectra, Zafira) ‰ Peugeot: back of seats, trunk coverings (406-607) ‰ Renault: rear shelf (Clio, Twingo) ‰ Mercedes Benz trucks: front sections for the trucks. ¾ HSK LS 1938, internal engine cover, insulation for the engine, sun-blades, interior insulation and bumper. ¾ HPN L 1622 -internal insulation; wheel box; roof; and back cover.

Automotive Parts Made of NF Composites

Advantages of Natural Fibre Reinforcement ‰ Renewable source of raw material ‰ Biodegradable ‰ Sustainable? ‰ Excellent specific strength and high modulus ¾ High flexural and tensile modulus -up to 5×base resin, high notched impact strength -up to 2×base resin

‰ Reduced density of products ‰ Lower cost ‰ Reduced tool wear ‰ Safe manufacturing processes ¾ No airborne glass particles, relief from occupational hazards. ¾ Reduced dermal and respiratory irritation and no emission of toxic fumes when subjected to heat and incineration

Challenges of Natural Fibre Reinforcement ‰ Challenges ¾ Concerns over fibre consistency/quality ¾ Low impact strength (high concentration of fibre defects) ¾ Problem of stocking raw material for extended time ƒ Possibility of degradation, biological attack of fungi and mildew ƒ Foul odor development

¾ Fibres are hydrophilic ƒ Issues of compatibility with polymers: fibre-matrix interface and fibre dispersion challenges ƒ Sensitive to humidity

¾ UV resistance – not better than plastics ¾ Fibre degradation during processing ¾ Fibre orientation and distribution

‰ Solutions ¾ Fibre treatments ¾ Compatibilization ¾ Textile technologies: mat and fabric structures

Composite Evolution Structural Composites

Platform 1950 Technologies

Structural composites Thermosets

and materials

1980-2000 Thermoplastics Nanocomposites

2005 Biocomposites Nanocomposites Biobased polymers

Industrial Sectors

Microelectronics Ground transportation Aerospace

•Biomedical •Transportation •Construction •Energy •Sport •Environment •Aerospace •Packaging…

Natural Fibres in Canada ‰ National level: federal government: sustainable economy ¾ Bio-fibres to produce value-added products: chemicals, textile, composites, etc ¾ Agriculture and Agri-food Canada: 145 M$ funding for this year alone: multidisciplinary research (soil, genetic modification, refinery, extraction, processing)  Canadian biomass innovative network (CBIN) ƒ Carbonhydrate: starch (wheet, corn, etc) ƒ Oil: canola ƒ Cellulose: flaxseed fibres and hemp  Present acttraction: triticale corp in Western Canada (carbonhydrate and cellulose)

‰ Local level: ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾

AB: BioAlberta, AVAC NB: BioAtlantech SK: Flax Canada 2015 ON: Bioproducts Business Network, AUTO 21, Ontario Agri-Food Technologies (OAFT), QC: Centre québécoise de valorisation des biotechnologies BC: BioProducts BC BIOCAP

Natural Fibres Initiative for Biochemicals and Biomaterials

AAFC

Kemestrie

Saskflax NRC-PBI

Biolin

Feedstock Producer John Baker (Stone Hedge Hemp)

BioEnergy/ BioFuel

NRC-BRI

Harvest + PostHarvest

Preparation of Feedstock

Seed Oils Process Heat

BioMaterials

Biolin Saskflax

Black boxes – Industry Research Contributions Red boxes – Project Modules

Module 1

Processing of Fibers •Two methods: 1 – Enzymatic 2 – ‘Green’ Mechanical/Chemical •Two Primary Tracks 1 - For Fibre 2 - For Biochemicals

NRC-IBS

TRACK 1 Biocomposites

NRC-BRI

End Users (Private Sector)

NRC-ICPET

TRACK 2 BioChemicals • such as ferulic acid

NRC-ICPET

Module 2 AAFC

Biopolymers

NRC-IBS

Ferulic Acid Platform

Module 3

Module 5 NRC-IMI

NRC-BRI NRC-IMI

Module 4

• Composite Innovation Centre (Links to Boeing, Dow BioProducts and others), Biolin, Hemptown

Related CBIN Threads

GHG Reduction

NRC-IMI NRC-BRI NRC-ICPET

Biocomposites Objectives ‰ Development flax (hemp) fiber composites and applications based on synthetic (PP) and biobased (PLA) polymers ƒ Improvement of processability ƒ Improvement in mechanical properties, humidity resistance and flammability resistance

‰ Evaluation of the performance of value-added products coming from recycling sources ƒ Use of recycled plastics

Processing ‰ Extrusion: short fibre ‰ Injection moulding: short fibre ‰ Compression moulding: short, long, continuous, matt, fabric Flax composite compound

‰ Mat or fabric construction ¾ Compression moulding ¾ Thermo-forming

Dried blend of flax, polymer and additives

NF Composites

IMI Patented technology licensed to Formulation based CaO additive

5000

75 Modulus

65 3000 55 2000 45 1000

0

35 Recycled PP

Licensed technology applied to transportation and construction sectors

Wood com posite

IMI 's com posite

Increase of material cost (%)

Improvement in flexural performance (%)

3.6

28

* Compared with commercial system

Flexural stress (MPa)

Flexural modulus (MPa)

Stress

4000

Roles of CaO ‰ CaO  Absorbs humidity in wood  Neutralizes acidity in wood Æ minimize degradation during processing  Reacts with maleic anhydride group of coupling agent ÆImprove interface between wood and PP matrix ÆIncrease molecular weight of coupling agent ÆLimit a loss in toughness and impact

Thermal and flammability resistance ‰ Improvement of the thermal resistance ‰ Slow down the burning process of the composites since the burning rate of the sample with CaO at 1 min (L1) and 5min (L5) is smaller than that of the REF. No

T10%

T20%

(oC)

(oC)

Weight loss at 500oC

No

L1

L5

(mm)

(mm)

No CaO

12

65

10% CaO

7

36

(wt%) No CaO

334

364

91

10% CaO

346

398

73

Recycling ‰ Wood-PP composites (with maleic anhydride coupling agent and CaO) can be reground, extruded and injection moulded 3 times without important loss of performance 6500

30

6000

28

5500

26

5000

24

4500 1st process 2nd process 3rd process

Unotched Izod impact strength 2 (kJ/m )

Tensile strength (MPa)

Strength Modulus

110

Tensile modulus (MPa)

32

100

90

80

70 1st process

2nd process

3rd process

Flax Fiber Composites Compression moulding

40

7000 5500

35 4000 2500

25

1000

30 %

30 %

FL AX

FL A X+ PB 30 31 % 50 FL A X+ EP 30 30 15 % FL 30 AX % +E FL 43 AX +E 43 +C aO

30

‰ Modulus and strength of the composites improve significantly with the presence of coupling agent ‰ Type of coupling agent also plays an important role ‰ The presence of CaO provide a great increase in modulus

Tensile modulus (MPa)

Strength Modulus

PP

Tensile strength (MPa)

45

Interface No coupling agent ‰ Very poor interaction between the fiber and the matrix

Interface With coupling agent and CaO ‰ Good interface

Mechanical properties –

Strength

35.00

Modulus

4000

30.00

3000

25.00

2000

20.00

1000 PP

30% FLAX +E43 +CaO

2

5000

Tensile modulus (MPa)

Tensile strength (MPa)

40.00

Izod impact strength (kJ/m )

Injection moulding 18.00

15.00

12.00

9.00

6.00 PP

30% FLAX +E43 +CaO

‰ Flax fibres improved significantly the performance of PP, but the properties can be further improved ¾ Fibre retting and the fibre isolation process is not optimized ¾ Flax composite processes are not optimized

‰ It should be interesting to work with flax fabric as reinforcement

Conclusions ‰ Natural fibres like wood, ricehusk and flax can improve significantly the polymer performance ‰ The composite properties are determined by many different factor: fibre source, formulation, processing equipment and processing parameters ‰ The incorporation of some selective mineral fillers can greatly improves the thermal and the flammability resistance, the stiffness and the impact properties without sacrifying the strength. ‰ Forms as continuous fibres and fabric should be of great interest for producing high performance composites!

Opportunity of textile industry in composites ‰ Mass productions ¾ Transformation of NFs into different forms of reinforcement for composites, such as unidirectional NFs, NF fabrics, NF matt, comingle of NFs and synthetic polymer fibres, at low cost and low energy consumption ¾ Hybrid of NFs or NF and synthetic fibres ¾ Fibre treatment to improve performance and overcome limitation

‰ Special applications ¾ Functionality: surface coating (thermally and electrically conductive)

‰ Recycling of fibres???

Suggest Documents