Deep Water Gulf of Mexico Brian Smith General Manager, Major Capital Projects
James Cearley General Manager, Exploration
Deep Water Exploration & Projects Chevron North America Exploration and Production Credit Suisse Investor Group, St. Regis Hotel, Houston November 20th, 2008 © Chevron 2007
Cautionary Statement CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS RELEVANT TO FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 This presentation of Chevron Corporation contains forward-looking statements relating to Chevron’s operations that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about the petroleum, chemicals and other energy-related industries. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “schedules,” “estimates,” “budgets” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. The reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation. Unless legally required, Chevron undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are crude oil and natural gas prices; refining margins and marketing margins; chemicals prices and margins; actions of competitors; timing of exploration expenses; the competitiveness of alternate energy sources or product substitutes; technological developments; the results of operations and financial condition of equity affiliates; the inability or failure of the company’s joint-venture partners to fund their share of operations and development activities; the potential failure to achieve expected net production from existing and future crude oil and natural gas development projects; potential delays in the development, construction or start-up of planned projects; the potential disruption or interruption of the company’s net production or manufacturing facilities or delivery/transportation networks due to war, accidents, political events, civil unrest, severe weather or crude-oil production quotas that might be imposed by OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries); the potential liability for remedial actions or assessments under existing or future environmental regulations and litigation; significant investment or product changes under existing or future environmental statutes, regulations and litigation; the potential liability resulting from pending or future litigation; the company’s acquisition or disposition of assets; gains and losses from asset dispositions or impairments; government-mandated sales, divestitures, recapitalizations, changes in fiscal terms or restrictions on scope of company operations; foreign currency movements compared with the U.S. dollar; the effects of changed accounting rules under generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by rule-setting bodies; and the factors set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” on pages 32 and 33 of the company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. In addition, such statements could be affected by general domestic and international economic and political conditions. Unpredictable or unknown factors not discussed in this presentation could also have material adverse effects on forward-looking statements. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules permit oil and gas companies to disclose only proved reserves in their filings with the SEC. Certain terms, such as “resources,” “undeveloped gas resources,” “oil in place,” “recoverable reserves,” and “recoverable resources,” among others, may be used in this presentation to describe certain oil and gas properties that are not permitted to be used in filings with the SEC. In addition, SEC regulations define oil-sands reserves as mining-related and not a part of conventional oil and gas reserves. © Chevron 2008
2
Why Deep Water? Future oil demand is likely to remain strong Deep water is where the remaining big reserves are located Deep water drilling will account for 25% of Global Deepwater offshore oil production by 2015, compared to just 9% now Innovative technologies will allow economic developments © Chevron 2008
3
Chevron Manages a World-Class Portfolio of Projects and Deepwater Operations Faroes
Canada Philippines
U.S.A. Nigeria
Australia
Angola Brazil
Chevron’s Major Deepwater Operations
© Chevron 2008
4
Chevron Manages a World-Class Portfolio of Projects and Deepwater Operations • TCO SGI/SGP
Faroes • Karachaganak II & III
Amauligak • Tahiti
AOSP Expansion Piceance Basin North Duri Philippines Australia
• Gehem
U.S.A. Plataforma Deltana
• Jack
Canada
• St. Malo • Blind Faith
Nigeria
• Agbami • Nigeria
EGTL Angola • Usan
• Gendalo • Frade • Papa-Terra BC-20
• Gorgon • Wheatstone
Chevron’s Major Deepwater Capital Projects Projects shown are >$1Billion C&E net Chevron share except for BBLT © Chevron 2008
• ACG I-III
• Perdido
Brazil • Tombua Landana • BBLT • Angola
LNG
• Nsiko • Bonga
SW/ Aparo
• Olokola
LNG
• Chad
5
’00-’05
'95-‘99
'90-'94
'85-'89
'80-'84
Production
3000
7500
1,063’
6000
Exploration 1,472’
4500
1,680’
Water Depth (f)
1500
'75-'79
'70-'74
'65-'69
0
'60-'64
'55-'59
'50-'54
Industry Production from Deep Water is Moving Deeper at an Increasing Pace
9000 10,500 11,300 © Chevron 2008
Compliant Tower
Empire State Building
Eiffel Tower
6
Technology is Pushing the Envelope on Water Depths “Tahiti” Gulf of Mexico
Under 4,000’ of water and five miles below the seabed
Drilling in depths that only yesterday seemed impossible… © Chevron 2008
7
Deep Water Gulf of Mexico Technical Challenges in Drilling Storms and hurricanes
Sea Level Empire State Building ~500 Meters
8,000’
Gulf of Mexico
Suprasalt Sediment
16,000’
Allochthonous Sigsbee Salt Canopy
24,000’
Upper Tertiary Sediments
32,000’
Lower Tertiary Cretaceous Autochthonous Salt
40,000’ © Chevron 2008
Loop and eddy currents cause vortex induced vibrations and motions to drill strings Unpredictable high pressure gas charged stringers and faults near surface Mobile/flow-able/dissolvable 10,000’ thick salt canopy with unpredictable layers of highly variable trapped sediments Unpredictable base of salt – rapid pressure differentials “Thief zones” of significantly lower pressure which cause lost circulation – fluid loss Ultra-deep reservoir with high temperatures, high pressures and low natural flow-ability
Basement 8
Deep Water Gulf of Mexico GOM Deepwater Well Complexity A Bird’s Eye View
Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Casing Program: 36” – 7 3/4” © Chevron 2008
Conventional Deepwater Casing Program: 30” – 7” 9
Chevron continues to have a strong position in Deep Water discovered fields 1000
Top 50 Gulf of Mexico Deep Water Fields
900
Field size distribution from Wood Mackenzie database
800 Chevron Interest
Trident
Gotcha Blind Faith
K2 Genesis
Puma
Petronius
Tonga
100
Big Foot
200
Tubular Bells
300
Mad Dog St. Malo
400
Jack Knotty Head
500
Tahiti
MMBOE
600
Great White
700
0
© Chevron 2008
10
Chevron’s Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Portfolio Tahiti Development Blind Faith Development Perdido Fold Belt Development Jack Discovery New Orleans Houston
Blind Faith Tubular Bells
Tahiti Tonga
Knotty Head Puma Big Foot
Perdido
St. Malo
Jack © Chevron 2008
Exploration
2007 -2010
Appraisal
Major Capital Projects
11
Major Capital Projects – Gulf of Mexico Tahiti Field Development CVX operated (58%) Field Development with Spar and Drill Centers
Total capital: $4.7 Billion 2 subsea drill centers producing to a truss Spar Water Depth: 4000’
125 MBOPD/70 MMCFD peak production 400-500 MMBOE potentially recoverable Current Activity: Hull and Topsides installed. HUC underway
© Chevron 2008
12
Major Capital Projects – Gulf of Mexico Tahiti Spar Transported to Texas
© Chevron 2008
13
Major Capital Projects – Gulf of Mexico Tahiti Spar Transported Offshore and Uprighted
© Chevron 2008
14
Major Capital Projects – Gulf of Mexico Topsides Installation Completed August 8th, 2008
© Chevron 2008
15
Major Capital Projects – Gulf of Mexico Blind Faith Project Topsides construction, Louisiana
New Orleans Tahiti
Blind Faith
Perdido Fold Belt
© Chevron 2008
CVX operated (75%)
Subsea wells producing to a Semi-submersible facility
Water Depth: 7,000’
60 MBOPD/60 MMCFD peak production
First Oil: 2008
100 MMBOE potentially recoverable
Hull fabrication, Finland
16
Topsides Lift at Kiewit
© Chevron 2008
17
Blind Faith – Ready to Leave Kiewit
© Chevron 2008
18
Blind Faith – Under Tow, on Location, control room and first oil
© Chevron 2008
19
Perdido Regional Development
New Orleans Tahiti
Blind Faith
Perdido Fold Belt
Silvertip Chevron = 60% Shell(Op)
Whale (Explor) Chevron = 100%
• Chevron has interest in multiple discoveries and in the Regional Development Host
Whale Silvertip
’
Perdido Regional Host & Export Pipeline
• 8,000’- 9,500’ water depth • 215 miles to shore • 65 miles to nearest infrastructure
AC 856 Total/Nexen
Tobago
• Development drilling and ,,,, facilities fabrication underway Trident
Great White Great White Chevron = 33.3% Shell(Op), BP
© Chevron 2008
Tobago Chevron = 57.5% Shell(Op), Nexen
Trident Chevron (Op) = 70% Statoil, ENI, Devon
20
Perdido Fields Layout Key Features : • Well Count •26 Producers •5 Injectors •
Regional Direct Vertical Access Host
Silvertip
Name Plate Capacity •100,000 BOPD •200 MMCFPD •40,000 BWPD •80,000 BWPD Water Injection
Subsea Separator/Boosting System (SBS)
Water injectors
Tobago Frio Pilot © Chevron 2008
Southwest Cluster
21
Perdido Hull Offshore
© Chevron 2008
22
Miocene & Lower Tertiary Discoveries in the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico
© Chevron 2008
23
Emerging Lower Tertiary Trend Jack #2 Well Test Results Drilled to a total depth of 28,175 feet Completed and tested in 7,000 feet of water, and more than 20,000 feet under the sea floor During the test, sustained a flow rate of more than 6,000 barrels of crude oil per day Testing represented approximately 40 percent of the total net pay measured in the well
© Chevron 2008
24
Deep Water GOM Wells are among the Most Technically Challenging in the World Examples where we push the envelope… Deepest successful well test in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico with Jack 2 (28,175’), a well situated in 7,000 feet (2,135 meters) of water and extending more than 20,000 feet (6,100 meters) beneath the seafloor New drilling depth record (34,189’) for the U.S. Gulf of Mexico at Knotty Head World record for successfully drilling a well in the deepest water depth (10,011’) in the Perdido Fold Belt © Chevron 2008
25
Success Requires Expertise in Critical Technologies Challenge
Technology Regional Geology Seismic Imaging Drilling
Extensive Salt Canopy Structural Complexity Few Wells
6,000’ (1800 m)
7,500’ (2300 m)
10000’ (3000 m)
Mexico
13
00
’ (4
00
m)
US
© Chevron 2008
26
Development Scale Subsalt Imaging Detailed velocity modeling results in significantly improved images Regional Velocity Model
Development Scale Velocity Model
Data Courtesy of WesternGeco
The latest seismic acquisition technologies, analysis of the sediment velocity field and detailed salt modeling are key to delivering high quality images in the Deepwater. 27 © Chevron 2008
Deep Water Drilling & Completions Meeting Future Technology Challenges
Drilling and completions technology Integrated technology solution Seismic imaging Reservoir modeling Rock mechanics Drilling operations Real-time monitoring
Live video camera and feed from rig © Chevron 2008
28
Deep Water Technology Breakthrough New Deep Water Drillship Most advanced drilling capabilities Dynamically positioned, with double-hull Two drilling systems in a single derrick Stronger and more efficient top drive so wells can be drilled deeper Other unique features will target drilling wells up to 40,000 feet of total depth
Transocean’s Discoverer Clear Leader
Variable deckload of over 20,000 metric tons; capable of drilling in water depths of up to 12,000 feet © Chevron 2008
29
Deep Water Facilities/Infrastructure Meeting Future Technology Challenges Future Floating Production System Model
~500 Meters
Compliant Tower
Reliability of Facilities/Systems Flow Assurance of Product Long Distance Tiebacks Well Intervention Cost Reduction © Chevron 2008
30
Summary Deepwater is a complex, risky, and costly environment. Many technical challenges remain to be solved. The industry is focused on finding solutions and providing the needed creativity and collaboration. Capable People World Class Safety Performance Innovative Technology Strong Partnerships © Chevron 2008
31
© Chevron 2008
32