CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – KING III COMPLIANCE REGISTER 2016 This document has been prepared in terms of the JSE Listing Requirements and sets out the application of the 75 corporate governance principles by Adcorp Holding Limited as recommended by the King Report and Code on Corporate Governance for South Africa, 2009 (King III). PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION
CHAPTER 1: ETHICAL LEADERSHIP AND CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP 1.1
The Board should provide effective leadership based on an ethical foundation
Applied
1.2
The Board should ensure that the company is and is seen to be a responsible corporate citizen
Applied
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
Adcorp Holdings has an explicit set of values that plays a key role in shaping the culture of Adcorp and its operating companies. The Board’s ethical leadership provides the foundation for the values which are central to the way Adcorp does business. Adcorp’s decisions and actions are based on these values and they form the basis of the Adcorp’s code of conduct. The Board has appointed Social and Ethics committee to assist in this regard. The terms of reference of the committee as it relates to corporate citizenship requires that the committee should monitor: Promotion of equality, prevention of unfair discrimination, reduction of corruption Contribution to development of the communities via our CSI projects. Corporate Social Investment is a vital part of Adcorp’s identity and it is with a great sense of pride that the Group so positively influences the lives of many. With a history of creating, maintaining and supporting development, social and environmental projects distinguishes who we are today.
Page 1 of 15
PRINCIPLE # 1.3
PRINCIPLE The Board should ensure that the company’s ethics are managed effectively
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION Adcorp has a Board approved Code of Conduct in place which includes the value statement of the company. The Transformation, Social and Ethics committee’s responsibility is to monitor cases reported on the tip‐off line, review any statements on ethical standards, review significant cases of employee conflict of interest, misconduct or fraud and any other area where unethical activity by employee or the company is alleged.
CHAPTER 2: BOARD AND DIRECTORS 2.1
The Board should act as the focal point for and custodian of corporate governance
Applied
2.2
The Board should appreciated that strategy, risk, performance and sustainability are inseparable The Board should provide effective leadership based on an ethical foundation
Applied
2.3
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
Applied
The Board terms of reference specifies the role of the Board, the chairman, the CEO and the individual members of the Board. The Board is further supported by three sub‐committees that have delegated responsibility to assist the Board in specific matters. The sub‐committees report to the Board at every Board meeting. The Adcorp Board has ensured the implementation of risk and sustainability frameworks. Strategy sessions are held annually which is approved by the Board. Adcorp Holdings has an explicit set of values that plays a key role in shaping the culture of Adcorp and its operating companies. The Board’s ethical leadership provides the foundation for the values which are central to the way Adcorp does business. Adcorp’s decisions and actions are based on these values and they form the basis of the Adcorp’s code of conduct.
Page 2 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
2.4
The Board should ensure that the company is and is seen to be a responsible corporate citizen
2.5
The Board should ensure that the company’s ethics are managed effectively
Applied
2.6
The Board should ensure that the company has an effective and independent Audit Committee
Applied
2.7
The Board should be responsible for the governance of risk The Board should be responsible for information technology governance
Applied
2.8
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The Board has appointed the Transformation, Social and Ethics committee to assist in this regard. The terms of reference of the committee as it relates to corporate citizenship requires that the committee should monitor: Promotion of equality, prevention of unfair discrimination, reduction of corruption Contribution to development of the communities via our CSI projects. Corporate Social Investment is a vital part of Adcorp’s identity and it is with a great sense of pride that the Group so positively influences the lives of many. With a history of creating, maintaining and supporting development, social and environmental projects distinguishes who we are today. Adcorp has a Board approved Code of Conduct in place which includes the value statement of the company. The Transformation, Social and Ethics committee’s responsibility is to monitor cases reported on the tip‐off line, review any statements on ethical standards, review significant cases of employee conflict of interest, misconduct or fraud and any other area where unethical activity by employee or the company is alleged. The Audit and Risk Committee has terms of reference that have been approved by the Board. The Audit Committee meets quarterly and reports to the Board at every Board meeting. The Audit Committee is properly constituted with four independent non‐executive directors, one of which is the chairperson of the Committee. The Board is assisted by the Audit and Risk Committee in discharging its duties for managing risk. The Board is assisted by the Audit and Risk Committee in discharging its duties for managing the IT governance.
Page 3 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
2.9
The Board should ensure that the company complies with applicable laws and considers adherence to non‐binding rule, codes and standards
2.10
The Board should ensure that there is an effective risk‐based internal audit
Applied
2.11
The Board should appreciate that stakeholders’ perceptions affect the company’s reputation
Applied
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The Board has ensured that a compliance framework and code of conduct has been implemented. Adcorp has zero tolerance for non‐ compliance. The Board also reviews and considers all new non‐ statutory corporate governance recommendations and implements them if the Board deems them to be in the best interest of Adcorp and its stakeholders. A quarterly report is presented to the Group Risk and Audit Committee updating legal and compliance matters for Adcorp The risk department is separate to the internal audit function. The Board has ensured the establishment of the group internal audit function which complies with the standards as set by the Institute of Internal Auditors for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and Code of Ethics. The function has terms of reference which has been approved by the Audit Committee. The internal audit methodology includes a risk‐based approach. Adcorp’s stakeholders are defined as any group or individual that can affect the company’s operations, or be affected by the company’s operations. These stakeholders include but are not limited to customers, employees, shareholders, unions, investors, analysts, government and regulatory bodies. The values bind the brands together and ensure consistency in interactions with all stakeholders. Stakeholders are treated fairly and Adcorp strive to enhance and develop services and communication channels to meet their expectations. In doing this, Adcorp keep up‐to‐ date of all developments in markets, labour legislation, improve and update the knowledge and understanding of its industries on an on‐ going basis, and applies its unique entrepreneurial skills and industry knowledge to grow and be successful. The Transformation, Social and Ethics Committee regularly identify all the stakeholders and oversee how the Group interacts with these stakeholders.
Page 4 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
2.12
The Board should ensure the integrity of the company’s integrated report
2.13
The Board should report on the effectiveness of the company’s system of internal controls
Applied
2.14
The Board and its directors should act in the best interest of the company
Applied
2.15
The Board should consider business rescue proceedings or other turnaround mechanism as soon as the company is financially distressed as defined in the Act
Applied
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The annual integrated report is compiled by an internal team, approved by management and is audited by independent external auditors, with oversight form the Audit and Risk Committee and approved by the Board prior to publication and circulation. The Board is assisted by the Audit and Risk Committee in reporting on the effectiveness of the company’s system of internal control which is done annually and a note is included in the annual financial statements. The Board and its committees strictly adhere to its fiduciary duties and duty of care and skill codified in the Companies Act. Policies / procedures have been implemented to ensure that Directors act within the best interests of the Group at all times. This includes: The declaration of all relevant interests at Board meetings; Disclosure of any potential or perceived conflict of interest by individuals; A policy that deals with the dealing in the Group’s securities; The taking of legal advice by the Board when deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the relevant legislation and the JSE Listing Requirements. Directors are permitted to obtain independent advice in respect of their duties and liabilities. The Audit and Risk Committee reviews financial information in detail and recommends any special action to the Board if required. In this regard the Group’s solvency and liquidity and going concern status are reviewed on a regular basis. Appropriate measures will be taken if the Group suffers financial distress at any stage.
Page 5 of 15
PRINCIPLE # 2.16
2.17
PRINCIPLE The Board should elect a chairman of the Board who is an independent non‐ executive director. The CEO of the company should not also fulfil the role of the chairman of the Board The Board should appoint the chief executive officer and establish a framework for the delegation of authority
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
Applied
2.18
The Board should comprise a balance of power, with a majority of non‐executive directors. The majority of non‐executive directors should be independent
Applied
2.19
Directors should be appointed through a formal process
Applied
2.20
The induction, ongoing training and development of directors should be conducted through a formal process
Applied
2.21
The Board should be assisted by a competent, suitably qualified and experience company secretary The evaluation of the Board, its committees and the individual directors should be performed every year
Applied
2.22
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION An independent non‐executive chairman has been appointed. The roles of the chairman and the CEO are separate.
The Board appointed the CEO and provided input into senior management appointments. The role and function of the CEO is formalised and the Board evaluates the performance of the CEO annually in combination with the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. A delegation of authority framework, approved by the Board, is in place. The Board consists of thirteen Directors, eight Non‐Executive Directors and five Executive Directors. Five of the Non‐Executive Directors are independent and three are not independent. In assessing the status of directors, the principles of King III and the JSE Listing Requirements are considered. The Board has adopted a policy on the procedures for the appointment of directors to ensure that the appointments are formal, transparent and a matter for the Board as a whole. This process is overseen by the Remuneration and Nomination Committee. All new directors are subject to a formal induction programme facilitated by the company secretary. The Board is updated on the latest employment regulations annually at the strategy session and experts are brought in for training as and when required. As stipulated in the Board’s mandate, it is the Board’s responsibility to appoint and remove the company secretary. A suitably qualified, competent and experienced company secretary has been appointed. The appraisal process of the Board and committees are conducted annually. During 2016 this was conducted by an external evaluation by the Institute of Directors.
Page 6 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
2.23
The Board should delegate certain functions to well‐structured committees without abdicating its own responsibilities
2.24
A governance framework should be agreed between the group and subsidiary Boards Companies should remunerate directors and executives fairly and responsibly
Applied
Companies should disclose the remuneration of each individual director and certain senior executives
Applied
2.25
2.26
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The Board committees assist the Board in executing its duties, powers and authorities. The required authority is delegated by the Board to each committee to enable it to fulfil its respective functions through formally approved terms of reference. Delegating authority to Board committees or management, other than the specific matters for which the Audit and Risk committee carries ultimate accountability in terms of the Companies Act, does not mitigate or discharge the Board and its directors of their duties and responsibilities and the Board fully acknowledge this fact. The Board has established the following committees: Audit and Risk Committee; Remuneration and Nomination Committee; Transformation, Social and Ethics Committee. The composition of the committees complies with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, the JSE Listing Requirements and King III. Refer to the committee reports in the Integrated Report for further details. The activities of the subsidiary Boards are reported to the main Board. All subsidiaries apply the policies and procedures of the holding company. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee considers the remuneration of the Executive and Non‐Executive Directors on an annual basis which is benchmarked against peer groups to ensure fair remuneration. Non‐Executive Directors’ fees are approved by shareholders with Executive Directors’ remuneration being reported to shareholders annually in the Integrated Report. Remuneration of the executive and non‐executive directors as well as prescribed officers is disclosed in the annual integrated report.
Page 7 of 15
PRINCIPLE # 2.27
PRINCIPLE Shareholders should approve the companies remuneration policy
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The remuneration policy is approved by the shareholders through a non‐binding special resolution at the Annual General Meeting of Adcorp Holdings.
CHAPTER 3: AUDIT COMMITTEE 3.1
The Board should ensure that the company has an effective and independent audit committee
Applied
3.2
Audit committee members should be suitably skilled and experienced independent non‐executive directors
Applied
3.3
The audit committee should be chaired by an independent non‐executive director The audit committee should oversee integrated reporting
Applied
The audit committee should ensure that a combined assurance model is applied to provide a coordinated approach to all assurance activities The audit committee should satisfy itself of the expertise, resources and experience of the company’s finance function
Applied
3.4
3.5
3.6
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
Applied
Applied
The Audit Committee has terms of reference that have been approved by the Board. The Audit Committee meets quarterly and reports to the Board at every Board meeting. The Audit Committee is properly constituted with four independent non‐executive directors, one of which is the chairperson of the Committee. The Audit and Risk Committee members collectively have the required level of qualifications and experience. The committee have a good understanding of integrated reporting, internal financial controls, the external and internal audit process, risk management, sustainability issues, information technology governance and other relevant matters within the group. The chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee is an independent non‐ executive director. The Board has assigned this responsibility to the Audit and Risk Committee which considers the disclosure in the Integrated Annual Report, including sustainability information, the annual financial statements and recommends the approval thereof to the Board. The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the combined assurance approach. The framework considers assurance according to the three lines of defence. The Audit and Risk Committee considers and satisfied itself of the sustainability of the expertise and experience of the financial director and the finance function on an annual basis.
Page 8 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
3.7
The audit committee should be responsible for overseeing the internal audit
3.8
The audit committee should be an integral component of the risk management process The audit committee is responsible for recommending the appointment of the external auditor and overseeing the external audit process The audit committee should report to the Board and the shareholders on how it has discharged its duties
3.9
3.10
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The expertise, resources and experience of the Group’s internal audit function and the internal audit plan is assessed on a regular basis. The Audit a d Risk Committee approves the annual internal plan and monitors performance against the plan. Quarterly reports are submitted by internal audit at the Audit and Risk Committee meetings. The terms of reference of the Audit and Risk Committee and its matrix of responsibilities include risk management. Annually, the Audit and Risk Committee reviews the independence of the external auditors, including the professional sustainability of the lead auditor, and recommends the appointment to the Board and shareholders for the forthcoming financial year. Audit and Board committee meetings are held on a quarterly basis. The Audit and Risk Committee reports to the both on its statutory duties and the duties that the Board assigned to the committee. The Audit and Risk Committee chairman attends the annual general meeting to respond to questions.
CHAPTER 4: THE GOVERNANCE OF RISK 4.1
The Board should be responsible for the governance of risk
Applied
4.2
The Board should determine the levels of risk tolerance
Applied
4.3
The risk committee or audit committee should assist the Board in carrying out its risk responsibilities
Applied
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
The governance of risk within the Group is the Board’s responsibility. The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the Group’s risk assessment and satisfied itself of the adequacy of responses and mitigations. The Board’s responsibility for risk governance is expressed in the Board terms of reference. A policy and plan for a system and process of risk management has been developed and the levels of risk tolerance are being defined. The Board has established the Audit and Risk Committee to assist in carrying out its risk responsibilities. This is included in the Audit and Risk Committees terms of reference approved by the Board.
Page 9 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
4.4
The Board should delegate to management the responsibility to design, implement and monitor the risk management plan
4.5
The Board should ensure that risk assessments are performed on a continual basis The Board should ensure that frameworks and methodologies are implemented to increase the probability of anticipating unpredicted risks The Board should ensure that management considers and implements appropriate risk responses
4.6
4.7
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
4.8
The Board should ensure continual risk monitoring by management
Applied
4.9
The Board should receive assurance regarding the effectiveness of the risk management process
Applied
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION Adcorp’s Board of directors retains ultimate responsibility for the entirety of processes for risk management. Adcorp’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is accountable to the Board for the management of risk facing Adcorp and is supported by the management of these risks by the operating managing executives. A Chief Risk Officer has been appointed who is also responsible for managing the Group’s risks. Risk assessments are embedded in the daily business activities of the company. An update is provided on a quarterly basis to the Audit and Risk Committee. The Board has appointed a Chief Risk Officer who reports directly to the CEO and has the authority to implement the risk management framework. The framework is supported by a methodology that enables proactive risk management. The Chief Risk Officer is responsible for implementing the Risk Management Framework. Adcorp’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is accountable to the Board for the management of risks facing Adcorp and is supported by the management of these risks by operating managing executives. An update is provided on a quarterly basis to the Audit and Risk Committee. Risk management is an integral part of business management. One aspect of the risk management methodology and process includes continuous monitoring. Risk management is embedded in the day‐to‐ day functions. Regular reports are provided to the Audit and Risk Committee and internal audit perform reviews of the effectiveness of the system of internal controls and risk management. The Board receives these reports on a quarterly basis.
Page 10 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
4.10
The Board should ensure that there are processes in place enabling complete, timely, relevant, accurate and accessible risk disclosure to stakeholders
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The Group’s Integrated Annual Report provides a comprehensive outline to stakeholders of the risk management process.
CHAPTER 5: THE GOVERNANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 5.1
The Board should be responsible for information technology (IT) governance
Applied
5.2
IT should be aligned with the performance and sustainability objectives of the company The Board should delegate to management the responsibility for the implementation of an IT governance framework The Board should monitor and evaluate significant IT investments and expenditure
Applied
5.3
5.4
Applied
Applied
5.5
IT should form an integral part of the company’s risk management
Applied
5.6
The Board should ensure that information assets are managed effectively
Applied
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
The Board delegated its duties related to Information Technology (IT) governance to the Audit and Risk Committee. The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible to obtain independent assurance on the IT governance and controls supporting outsourced IT services. An IT steering committee has been established to facilitate the alignment of IT and business goals. IT governance is a standing item on the Board’s agenda. The CIO is responsible for the implementation of all the structures, processes and mechanisms of the IT governance framework. This is reported to the Audit and Risk Committee on a quarterly basis. The Board and the Audit and Risk Committee oversee the value delivery of IT and monitor the return on investment from significant IT projects. This is reported through the IT steering committee to the Audit and Risk Committee. It forms part of the risk management framework. The IT management framework is aligned to the Group’s risk management framework, inclusive of disaster recovery measures. The Board ensures that the company identifies all personal information and treats it as an important business asset. Information Technology security policies is in place and Adcorp is in the process of making all relevant stakeholders aware of the POPI act and the implementation thereof.
Page 11 of 15
PRINCIPLE # 5.7
PRINCIPLE A risk committee and audit committee should assist the Board in carrying out its IT responsibilities
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The Board has delegated its duties related to the Information Technology to the Audit and Risk Committee where one of the duties is to ensure that the IT risks are adequately addressed through the risk management and monitoring process.
CHAPTER 6: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, RULES, CODES AND STANDARDS 6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
The Board should ensure the company complies with applicable laws and consider adherence to nonbinding rules, codes and standards The Board should ensure that the company complies with applicable laws, rules, codes and standards on the company and its business
Applied
Please refer to principle 2.9.
Applied
Compliance risk should form an integral part of the company’s risk management process The Board should delegate to management the implementation of an effective compliance framework and process
Applied
A formal induction presentation, for new directors, dealing with the Group’s strategy and their duties and responsibilities has been put in place. The Audit and Risk Committee ensures that directors receive regular briefings on changes in risk, law and the environment in which the company operates. A Legal and Compliance Officer has been appointed who is responsible to report on any changes in laws and regulations and report it to the Audit and Risk Committee. Compliance with laws and regulations is one of the Group’s strategic risks.
Applied
An appropriate structure to educate, train, communicate and measure compliance is in place. And compliance with applicable law and regulations are monitored on an on‐going basis.
Applied
An effective risk‐based internal audit function exists. The purpose, authority and responsibilities of the internal audit function are defined in the approved internal audit charter. The internal audit charter was reviewed during 2015.
CHAPTER 7: INTERNAL AUDIT 7.1
The Board should ensure that there is an effective risk based internal audit
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
Page 12 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
7.2
Internal audit should follow a risk based approach to its plan
7.3
Internal audit should provide a written assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s system of internal controls and risk management The audit committee should be responsible for overseeing internal audit
Applied
Internal audit should be strategically positioned to achieve its objectives
Applied
7.4
7.5
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION The internal audit activities are directed by a risk based annual operational internal audit plan, as approved by the Audit and Risk Committee. The group internal audit function annually provides a written assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s system of internal controls and risk management. The Chief Audit Executive (CAE) reports functionally to the Audit and Risk Committee and administratively to the Chief Financial Officer and is present at all meetings of the Committee. The Audit and Risk Committee approves the annual internal operational plan and monitors the performance against the approved work plan. The Chief Audit Executive has a standing invitation to attend executive committee meetings (MANCO). The CAE reports functionally to the Audit and Risk Committee chairman. The CAE also has unrestricted access to members of the Audit and Risk Committee and executives of the Group.
CHAPTER 8: GOVERNING STAKEHOLDER RELATIONSHIPS
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
Page 13 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
8.1
The Board should appreciate that stakeholders’ perceptions affect a company’s reputation
8.2
The Board should delegate to management to proactively deal with stakeholders relationships The Board should strive to achieve the appropriate balance between its various stakeholder groupings, in the best interests of the company
8.3
8.4
Companies should ensure the equitable treatment of shareholders
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION Adcorp’s stakeholders are defined as any group or individual that can affect the company’s operations, or be affected by the company’s operations. These stakeholders include but are not limited to customers, employees, shareholders, investors, analysts, government and regulatory bodies. The values bind the brands together and ensure consistency in interactions with all stakeholders. Stakeholders are treated fairly and Adcorp strive to enhance and develop services and communication channels to meet their expectations. In doing this, Adcorp keep up‐to‐ date of all developments in markets, labour legislation, improve and update the knowledge and understanding of its industries on an on‐ going basis, and applies its unique entrepreneurial skills and industry knowledge to grow and be successful. The key priorities, objectives and opportunities for the group are to build new and strengthen existing stakeholder relationships. The values bind the brands together and ensure consistency in interactions with all stakeholders. Stakeholders are treated fairly and Adcorp strive to enhance and develop services and communication channels to meet their expectations. In doing this, Adcorp keeps well‐ informed and up to date of all developments in the markets, improve and update the knowledge and understanding of its industries on an ongoing basis, and applies its own unique industry knowledge to grow and be successful. All shareholders are treated equally. Information is available on the public domain and communicated in the annual sense announcement.
Page 14 of 15
PRINCIPLE #
PRINCIPLE
8.5
Transparent and effective communication with stakeholders is essential for building and maintaining their trust and confidence
8.6
The Board should ensure that disputes are resolved as effectively, efficiently and expeditiously as possible
APPLIED / PARTIALLY APPLIED / NOT APPLIED Applied
Applied
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OR APPLICABLE EXPLANATION All information is available on the public domain and communicated in the annual sense announcement. All these communication tools are required to comply with all legal requirements and legislation. Adcorp also provide its stakeholders with an Annual Integrated Report, manual or electronically available on the Adcorp website, www.adcorp.co.za Internal disputes are resolved by making use of the relevant grievance processes. External disputes – are dealt with on a case to case basis and if required expert advice will be obtained. The primary objective being to ensure that disputes are resolved as effectively, efficiently and expeditiously as possible.
CHAPTER 9: INTEGRATED REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE 9.1
The Board should ensure the integrity of the company’s integrate report
Applied
9.2
Sustainability reporting and disclosure should be integrated with the company’s financial reporting
Applied
9.3
Sustainability reporting and disclosure should be independently assured
Applied
The Audit and Risk Committee reviews the integrated annual report and recommend approval of the report to the Board. The Board reviews and finally approves the content of the integrated report prior to publication. An Integrated Report is produced which, together with complementary reports, addresses the sustainability of the Group, including financial and non‐financial aspects such as risk, environment, social and governance issues. Reporting is prepared in line with recognised guidelines that include International Financial Reporting Standards and King III Adcorp has adopted a strategy to increase sustainability assurance coverage over time. Moderate assurance was obtained that Adcorp has adhered to the AA1000 principles of inclusivity, materiality and responsiveness for the reporting period and that selected KPIs have been prepared in accordance with the defined reporting criteria and are free from material misstatement.
Corporate Governance – King III Compliance Register 2016
Page 15 of 15
