Corneal transplantation: Evolution and Innovations

Corneal transplantation: Evolution and Innovations Korine van Dijk, Lisanne Ham, Lamis Baydoun, Vasilis Liarakos, Hilde van Esch, Jack Parker, Henny O...
Author: Godfrey Cobb
5 downloads 1 Views 4MB Size
Corneal transplantation: Evolution and Innovations Korine van Dijk, Lisanne Ham, Lamis Baydoun, Vasilis Liarakos, Hilde van Esch, Jack Parker, Henny Otten, Isabel Dapena, Gerrit Melles

Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam, Amnitrans Eye Bank Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Corneal transplantation

• Introduction • Penetrating keratoplasty • Lamellar keratoplasty techniques • Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK)

• Bowman layer implantation • Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DS(A)EK) • Descemet membrane (automated) keratoplasty (DM(A)EK)

• Conclusion

History of keratoplasty 1789 Replacing opaque cornea by man-made material (De Quengsy GP: Precis au cours d´operations sur la chirurgie des yeux, Paris:Didot)

1818 Introduction of the term ´keratoplasty` (Reisinger F: Die Keratoplastik: Ein Versuch zur Erweiterung der Augenheilkunst, Bayrische Ann Chir Augenheilk)

1888 1st successful heterograft: anterior lamellar keratoplasty (v. Hippel: Eine neue Methode der Hornhauttransplantation, Graefes Arch Ophthalmol)

History of keratoplasty

1905 1st successful homologous penetrating keratoplasty (Zirm E., Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol,1906)

Penetrating keratoplasty Traditional PK All disorders

Mushroom PK Stromal disorders

Top hat PK Endothelial disorders Tan and Heng. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013

PK - Limitations

Maumenee. Am. J. Ophthalmology 1950; Pineros et al. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; Jonas et al. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; Elder et al. Cornea 2004

PK - Indications

25% Keratoconus 10% (Superficial) scars

40-50% Endothelial disease (FED, PPBK, PEX)

Cursiefen et al. Changing Indications for penetrating keratoplasty, Cornea 1998 Eyebank Association of America, Statistical report, 2005

Penetrating keratoplasty  Lamellar keratoplasty Full thickness

Anterior

Posterior (EK)

PKP

(D)ALK

DS(A)EK

DMEK

Open sky procedure

yes

no

no

no

Wound / suture related problems

yes

yes

no

no

Visual recovery

slow

faster

fast

very fast

Rejection

average

low

low

low

8

Lamellar keratoplasty •

Donor tissue not suitable for PK or anterior LK may be suitable posterior LK.



Donor tissue not suitable for PK or posterior LK may be suitable anterior LK



“Double use” of 1 donor cornea

Lie et al. 2010; Heindl et al. 2011; Ólafsdóttir 2011, Sharma et al. 2011, Groeneveld et al. 2012

Lamellar keratoplasty • (Deep) anterior lamellar keratoplasty ((D)ALK) • Only anterior part of the cornea replaced • Descemet and endothelium preserved

• Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) • Only posterior part of the cornea replaced • Anterior cornea not compromised

Lamellar keratoplasty

PK

DALK

DMEK DSEK

Deep Anterior Lamellar keratoplasty (DALK)

Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Melles Cornea Clinic, Amnitrans Eye Bank Rotterdam, The Netherlands

DALK

DALK: Indications

DALK: advantages Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) • • • • •

Less traumatic surgery Preserved ocular integrity Faster recovery  Earlier suture removal Reduced risk of allograft rejection Minor loss of ECD  Increased graft survival rate

Ing et al. Ophthalmology, 1998 Van Dooren et al. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004 Chung et al. Ophthalmologica, 2010 Borderie et al. Ophthalmology, 2011 Reinhart et al, Ophthalmology, 2011

DALK

DALK Dissection

•Anwar technique (“Big bubble” dissection) •NIIOS technique (Manual dissection with optical reference plane) Melles et al. BJO, 1999 Melles et al. Cornea, 2000 Anwar.& Teichmann. JCRS, 2002 Fontana et al. AJO, 2007 Villarubia et al. J Emmetropia, 2010 Baradaran-Rafii et al. Ophthalmol, 2012

DALK: Anwar “Big bubble” technique

Anwar & Teichmann. JCRS, 2002 17

DALK: NIIOS technique

DALK: NIIOS technique

DALK: Results

6m post-DALK

DALK: Results

2 years post-DALK

DALK: Results •

Complications  • Intra-operative DM perforation (±10%)1-3 • Persistent epithelial defect (≈PK)3,4 • Allograft rejection (