Control of Struvite Deposition in Wastewater Treatment Plants Paul L. Bishop Associate Vice President for Research University of Cincinnati 11th Annual Central States Water Environment Association Education Conference April 4, 2006
Typical Municipal WWTP Flow Diagram Incoming Wastewater
Bar Screen
Dissolved Air Flotation Tank
Screenings Gravity Thickener
Grit Chamber
Further Dewatering Primary Clarifier
Aeration Tanks
Secondary Clarifier
Chlorine Contact Tank
Plant Effluent
Return Activated Sludge
Anaerobic Sludge Digester
Sludge Dewatering Facility
Sludge to Incinerator, Farmland or Landfill
Centrate/Filtrate
Grits
Problems § Anaerobic sludge digestion releases ammonium, magnesium and phosphate, which can form struvite in digesters and downstream dewatering facilities § Can result in scaling in pipelines and on walls of process equipment
§ Centrate or filtrate from sludge dewatering is usually returned to the plant headworks where it can add to the wastewater burden
Struvite § Magnesium ammonium phosphate MgNH4PO4
· 6H2O
§ Named after Russian diplomat, H.G. von Struve (1772-1851) § White, yellowish white, or brownish white in color § FW = 245.41 § Specific density = 1.7 § Very insoluble in water, pKso = 12.6 – 13.15 at 25oC
Struvite Chemistry NH4+ ⇔ NH3 (aq) + H+
pKa=9.3
H3PO4 ⇔ H2PO4- + H+
pKa1= 2.1
H2PO4- ⇔ HPO42- + H+
pKa2= 7.2
HPO42- ⇔ PO43- + H+
pKa3= 12.3
MgOH+ ⇔ Mg2+ + OH-
pK=2.56
MgNH4PO4.6H2O ⇔ Mg2+ + NH4+ +PO43- + 6H2O
pK=12.6
Struvite formation occurs when the conditions are such that the concentration product exceeds the struvite conditional solubility product
Conditional Solubility of Struvite vs pH 2+
Mg
1 -1
4 2
NH4
0 -2 1 -4
3
5
7
9
+
11 13
-3 -5 -7 -9
-6 -8
MgNH4PO4.6H2O
-10 -12
PO4
-11
Log (ionization fraction)
Log (Ps)
8 6
-13
3-
-15
pH
Ps = conditional solubility product Kso = solubility product
Ps = CT , Mg CT , NH3 CT , PO4
Kso = α Mg2+ α NH + α PO3− γ Mg2+ γ NH + γ PO3− 4
4
4
4
CT,Mg = total concentration of all soluble magnesium species CT,NH3 = total concentration of all soluble ammonia species CT,PO4 = total concentration of all soluble phosphate species "i = ionization fraction for component i γi = activity coefficient for component i
Struvite Formation in Sludge Dewatering Process Anaerobically digested sludge, anaerobic supernatant (centrate/filtrate) Mixing & perturbations Carbon dioxide stripping pH elevation Phosphate equilibrium shifts towards PO43[Mg2+] [NH4+][PO43-] exceeds struvite solubility product (super-saturation) Nucleation and crystal growth
Struvite precipitates
MgNH4PO4 . 6H2O
Filtrate return line
Struvite encrusted roller
Ball check
Productivity lost!!
(Courtesy Schaner’s Waste Water Products, Inc.)
Problems with Current Struvite Control Techniques § Addition of iron chloride to form vivianite (Fe3(PO4)2 . 8H2O) " Chloride concentration increases " Ferric ion acts as an acid, lowering pH " Large volume inorganic sludge generation " Phosphate recovery from ferric phosphate salt(s) is nearly impossible § Similar problems with ferric sulfate or alum
Objective § Investigate the use of magnesium hydroxide to remove nutrients in a controlled fashion from digested sludge § Can use waste flue gas desulfurization sludge as a source of Mg(OH)2
Characterization of Mg(OH)2: Basic Properties that are Important to Wastewater Treatment Applications
Magnesium Hydroxide Dissolution Kinetics 10 9.5 9
pH
8.5 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00
Time (min)
Titration Curves of Several Neutralization Chemicals 14 12
pH
10 8 6 C
D
4
A
B
2 0 0
0.002
0.004
0.006
Titrant Added (eq.) A = calcium hydroxide; B = pure magnesium hydroxide; C = sodium carbonate; D = as-received magnesium hydroxide slurry
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
Buffering Capacity(eq/pH)
Relative Neutralization Capacity
Relative Neutralization Capacity and Buffering Capacity of Several Neutralization Reagents (at pH = 8.5) 0.0035 0.003 0.0025 0.002 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 0
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1 = pure magnesium hydroxide; 2 = sodium carbonate; 3 = calcium hydroxide; 4 = as-received magnesium hydroxide slurry.
4
Summary Mg(OH)2 has unique features compared with other commonly used chemicals: § slow dissolution process § high neutralization capacity § high buffering intensity
Sludge Digestion Enhancement Using Mg(OH)2
NH3-N, PO43--P, Mg2+, Ca2+ and SO42- Changes During Anaerobic Sludge Digestion
Biogas Production Profiles During Anaerobic Sludge Digestion Biogas Volume (L)
300 250 200 150
Mg(OH)2 reactor Control reactor
100 50 0
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
Digestion Time (hours)
500.00
600.00
Summary Applying magnesium hydroxide into an anaerobic sludge digester can: Result in greater destruction of COD and SS Enhance the production rate of biogas Increase overall treatment efficiency Reduce level of nutrients in the supernatant that must be returned to the plant’s headworks § Increase the nutrient content in the generated biosolids for agricultural use § Improved sludge dewaterability, which will ease the operation of the down stream sludge dewatering facilities § § § §
Nutrient Removal from Anaerobically Digested Sludge and Sludge Supernatant Using Mg(OH)2
3-
9
160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
8.5 8 7.5
0
100
200
300
400
7 500
Time (min) Phosphate---No mix control Phosphate---Mg(OH)2=100mg/L pH---No mix control pH---Mg(OH)2=100 mg/L
Phosphate---Mixed control Phosphate---Mg(OH)2=250mg/L pH---Mixed control pH---Mg(OH)2=250 mg/L
pH
PO4 -P (mg/L)
Nutrient Removal from Digested Sludge
Pilot Scale Experimental Results on Phosphate Removal from Centrate 70 air stripping only
50 40 30
settling period
aeration period
PO43- -P (mg/L)
60
air stripping + 200 mg/L MgCl2 air stripping + 400 mg/L MgCl2 air stripping + 100 mg/L Mg(OH)2 air stripping + 200 mg/L Mg(OH)2 air stripping + 400 mg/L Mg(OH)2
20 10 0 0
50
100
Time (min)
150
200
Total phosphorus mass balance without metal phosphate precipitation from centrate/filtrate Influent
310
100
effluent
Primary + secondary treatment systems
10
300 Sludge digester
300 Filtrate/centrate
210
sludge cake
Sludge dewatering
90
Total phosphorus mass balance with metal phosphate precipitation from centrate/filtrate Influent
100 Treated filtrate/ centrate
107 7
effluent
Primary + secondary treatment systems
10
97 Sludge digester
97 Metal phosphate precipitation reactor
Filtrate/centrate
68
Sludge dewatering
P-containing chemical sludge
61
sludge cake + chemical sludge
29
90
Summary § Use of Mg(OH)2 to remove nutrients from anaerobically digested sludge is effective only if the sludge is well digested. § Removing phosphate from the side waste stream will: § reduce the nutrient load to the headworks of the treatment plant (this is a current practice that adversely affects the overall treatment efficiency) § lower the potential for struvite formation, which is a frequently occurring O&M problem in many municipal wastewater treatment plants § generate a slow release fertilizer
Improving the Settleability and Dewaterability of Activated Sludge: Applications of Mg(OH)2
350
700
300
600
250
500
200
400
150
300
100
200
50
100
0
0 0
20
40
60
80
Mg(OH)2 Dosage (mg/L)
100
120
SV(ml/L)
SVI
Effect of Mg(OH)2 on Activated Sludge Settleability
Surface Charge Density Changes vs Mg(OH)2 Dosage COO-
---Mg2+ ---
-OOC
Relative Surface Charge
NH3
NH3
2 1 0 -1 0
20
40
60
80
100
-2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7
Magnesium Hydroxide Addition (mg/L)
Mixed Liquor Sedimentation Curves under Different Mg(OH)2 Dosage Conditions Height of water/sludge interface (cm)
180 160
Mg(OH)2: 0 mg/L Mg(OH)2: 100 mg/L
140
Mg(OH)2: 300 mg/L Mg(OH)2: 500 mg/L
120 100 80 60 40 0:00:00
0:14:24
0:28:48
0:43:12
0:57:36
Time (hour:minute:second)
1:12:00
1:26:24
Sludge Dewaterability Changes with the Addition of Mg(OH)2 CST (seconds)
290 285 280 275 270 265 260 255 0
50
100
150
Mg(OH)2 Dosage (mg/L)
200
Summary § By charge neutralization, sweep flocculation and Mg2+ bridging between the EPS matrices of the microorganisms, Mg(OH)2 is effective in improving the settleability of activated sludge § Besides enhancing the overall sludge digestion process efficiency, Mg(OH)2 application to anaerobic sludge digester can also generate a digested sludge that is easier to dewater
Conclusions § Mg(OH)2 improved the biological phosphate uptake and release behavior of activated sludge § Mg2+ was found to stimulate the phosphate uptake during aeration periods § The pH increase caused by Mg(OH)2 addition enhanced phosphate release during the anaerobic sedimentation period § Research results provide supporting evidence for the potential application of Mg(OH)2 in EBPR processes
Conclusions § Magnesium hydroxide can effectively improve the settleability of mixed liquor during sedimentation in secondary clarifier and the dewaterability of anaerobically digested sludge in sludge dewatering § Magnesium hydroxide can enhance the overall process efficiency of anaerobic sludge digestion due to improved pH/alkalinity and the supplementation of Mg2
Conclusions § Magnesium hydroxide is effective in removing nutrients from anaerobic supernatant, thus reducing the nutrient load returned to the headworks of the plant § It minimizes the risk of struvite formation and generates a good plant fertilizer § Magnesium hydroxide is superior to other commonly used chemicals in this regard FeCl3, alum and lime. § Aeration (for mixing) plus magnesium chloride (Mg2+ source) plus struvite seeding proves to be a good process for controlled struvite crystallization.
Potential Mg(OH)2 Application Locations in Municipal WWTP Incoming Wastewater
Bar Screen
Dissolved Air Flotation Tank
Screenings Gravity Thickener
Grit Chamber
Grits
Primary Clarifier
Ma Hy gne dr siu ox m ide 2
Centrate/Filtrate
Further Dewatering
H
1
Secondary Clarifier
Chlorine Contact Tank
Plant Effluent
3 Magnesium Hydroxide
Sludge Dewatering Facility Magnesium Hydroxide
M ag yd n e ro siu xi m de
Aeration Tanks
Return Activated Sludge
Anaerobic Sludge Digester
Sludge to Incinerator, Farmland or Landfill
4