XXX Ltd Poly Aluminum Chloride Qingdao, Shandong Province 24/09/2012 N/A XXX Water Purification Material Co., Ltd
Order Quantity:
47.06MT
Pieces ready for Inspection: Loaded Qty for 2 Container Reference Sample Available:
47.06MT 47.06MT N/A
Factory Organisation Good
Inspector’s Opinion on the Factory Good
Inspection Standards Inspection type:
Container Loading Check (CLC)
Sampling standard:
At random
Sampling level:
N/A
AQL for Critical defective:
N/A
AQL for Major defective:
N/A
AQL for Minor defective:
N/A
Sampling size for Critical/ Major/ Minor:
N/A
Number of inspected pieces:
N/A
Total number of products:
47.06MT
Number of inspected cartons:
4 samples by random
Number of the cartons inspected:
N/A
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
Number of Inspection Days:
1 day (24th September 2012)
Inspector: Jacky Zhao
Supervisor: Jenny Li
Loading Commencement Time
Loading Completion Time
8:30am
17:30pm
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
Map of China Inspection location: Qingdao Port ( Located in Shandong province)
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
Important Remarks / General Defects
1. The container loading inspection was conducted at the port of Qingdao. 2. The supplier was not at the loading spot. 3.7 sacks of poly aluminum chloride were damaged. 4. 1 sack was damaged during the container loading. 5. The total weight is 47.06MT for 2 containers. 6. 942 sacks were loaded for each container 7. The product color is brown please refer to the attached photograph.
Photos of Products remarks and defects
Damaged Sacks
Damaged Sacks
Damaged Sacks
Damaged Sacks
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
Damaged Sacks
Damaged Sacks
Brown colour
Brown colour
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
Loading and Packing Requirements 1. Colour of the product
Expected Result
Result
Actual Findings/ Comments
N/A
Buyer needs to confirm with the Seller
The colour is brown
Photos of Product
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
2. Loaded Quantity Expected Result
Result
Actual Findings/ Comments
Total quantity is 1884 bags
OK
Conform to the requirements. Containers were fully loaded.
Total number of products loaded:
1884 bags
Photos of Products
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
3. Weight Expected Result
Result
Actual Findings/ Comments
The weight should be 47.06MT
OK
Conform to the requirements.
Photos of Weight test
Weighing the total weight of the truck with products. The weight is 63.1MT
Weighing the total weight of the truck without products. The weight is 16.04MT
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
Test result: Gross weight: 63.1MT, truck weight: 16.04MT, the product weight: 47.06MT
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
4. Product appearance Expected Result
Result
Actual Findings/ Comments
The product should not have any other impurities
OK
No impurities in the products
Photos of Product Appearance
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
5. Sample test Expected Result
Result
Actual Findings/ Comments
Take the sample and send to the laboratory to test the content of the AL2O3
Buyer needs to confirm with the Seller
Have taken samples from 4 random sacks and sent the samples to the SGS laboratory. The report will be provided next week
Photos of Product Appearance
N/A
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
6. Packing Expected Result
Result
Actual Findings/ Comments
The sacks should be strong with no damage
Buyer needs to confirm with the Seller
7 sacks were broken. The broken sacks were changed.
Photos of Product
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
N/A
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
7. Loading Process A. Empty Container Requested Check
Actual Findings/ Comments
Container Door Numbers:
MSCU2117190, MSCU1098562
Inner Door Numbers:
MSCU2117190, MSCU1098562
Outside Container Numbers
MSCU2117190, MSCU1098562
Photos of Empty Containers & Initial Loading :
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
B. ¼ Full Container Requested Check
Actual Findings/ Comments
Loading Method: By Hand or Machine
Loading by hand
Is the container being loaded from the back up or from the top down
The container was loaded from the back up.
Describe how the products are stacked up (collapse risks)?
The bags are stacked inside one by one. No collapse risk. No Pallets
How many layers of pots are there inside the container?
N/A
Did the inspector observe any pots falling or collapsing during the loading process?
No
Photos of ¼ Full Container
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
a. ½ Full Container Requested Check
Actual Findings/ Comments
Did the inspector observe any bags falling or collapsing during the loading process?
No
Photos of ½ Full Container
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
a. ¾ Full Container Requested Check
Actual Findings/ Comments
Did the inspector observe any products falling or collapsing during the loading process?
No
Photos of ¾ Full Container
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
a. Full Container Requested Check
Actual Findings/ Comments
Is the container completely full? If no, describe how the sacks are tied together
The container is completely full
Is there any space between the top of the last layer of the products and the roof of the container?
Yes, but a little.
Give details of the container(s) seals number
Seal number: 033401 for MSCU2117190 Seal number: 033403 for MSCU1098562
Did the inspector observe any products falling or collapsing during the loading process?
No
Photos of Full Container
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
www.tcichina.org
No.4 Container Loading Inspection
b. Container Closing Requested Check
Actual Findings/ Comments
Did the inspector observe any products falling or collapsing during the loading process?
