Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs)
Craig Davies-Cutting, Ph.D. Catalent Pharma Solutions Management Forum – Dry Powder Inhalers London 30 June – 1 July 2010 © 2010 Catalent Pharma Solutions. All rights reserved
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Considerations for Filling DPIs • Quality by Design (QbD) Considerations — Development Philosophy — Impact of Device — Impact of Powder
• Mechanisms for Dosing Inhalation Powders Approaches for Filling DPIs • Compare and Contrast Data — Auger Filling — Dosator Filling — Drum Filling
Concluding remarks
2
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
1
Quality by Design (QbD)
Product Profile Life Cycle LifeManagement, Cycle Management, Continuous Continuous Improvement Improvement
Control Strategy Control Strategy
Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)
QbD
Key Parameters Associated with CQAs and Risk Assessment
Design Space
ICH Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development; ICH Q9 Quality Risk Management 3
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Product Development & DPI Filling Project Scope
Clinical Product
Pre-IND/IMPD
PhI to IIa
•Manual/Semi-auto •100 – 5,000 doses •Low/moderate throughput
Commercial Product
PhIIb
PhIII/ NDA/MAA
Commercial Manufacture
•Semi-auto/automated
•Fully automated
•5,000 – 100,000 doses
•100,000+ doses
•Moderate throughput
•High throughput •In-line process verification
4
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
2
Product Development & DPI Filling Project Scope
Clinical Product
Pre-IND/IMPD
PhI to IIa
•Manual/Semi-auto •100 – 5,000 doses •Low/moderate throughput
Commercial Product
PhIIb
PhIII/ NDA/MAA
Commercial Manufacture
•Semi-auto/automated
•Fully automated
•5,000 – 100,000 doses
•100,000+ doses
•Moderate throughput
•High throughput •In-line process verification
5
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Define the Goals Product Profile
Product profile Performance
Input Materials, eg. API, Carrier Lactose
Formulation/ Process
Powder Filling/Device Assembling
•Delivered dose uniformity •Aerodyn particle size distribution
Fit for pupose •Clinical •Commercial
Therapeutic target •Local vs systemic
Target patient population, region, etc.
Device Selection/ Package
Stability
Methodology
Storage vs. in Use
QC Release vs. Real Patient Use
Formulation/Device Interaction
Process Analytical Technology (PAT)
Understand the CQAs; Associate attributes/parameters to CQAs and assess the risk; Develop design space; Implement control and Manage the product lifecycle 6
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
3
Product Profile, Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) and Design Space
DDU and APSD
Key Product Attributes
CQAs
Formulation Content Uniformity
Device Formulation Formulation Metering/ Aerosolization Flowability Dispersion Properties Mechanism
Design Space
Input MaterialsAPI/Carrier Lactose
Formulation
Process - Mixing
Process - Device Filling
Formulation Physical/ Chemical Stability
Device / Package
Dry Powder Inhaler Specifications: Delivered dose uniformity (DDU) and Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution (APSD) Appearance, Identification, Microbial Limits, Water/Moisture content, Net Content, Drug Content, Impurities and Degradation Products, Microscopic Evaluation 7
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
QbD and DPIs •Delivery of dry powder aerosol to the lungs for local or systemic treatment •Dry Powder Inhaler = Dry powder formulation + Inhaler device Product Size reduced API (< 5µm)
Process
Dry Powder Formulation micronization,
Pure API size reduced by spray dry or other technology
Dry Powder Formulation
Inhaler Blending/blender Device Low shear- Turbula® shake mixer, Pharmatech® blender “High shear” (high impact) Pharmx®, KG5,Glatt®, Hosakawa® GEA Niro Pharma (PMA), DIOSNA
Loose agglomerates of pure API/API diluent API/Carrier (Lactose monohydrate) blend
Active and passive devices Factory metered and device metered device
Inhaler Device
Dry Powder Inhaler
Powder Filling and Packing
Quantos™ Xcelodose® Omnidose ™ Other
Quantos is a trademark of Mettler-Toledo AG Corp., Turbula is a registered trademark of Willy A. Bachofen AG Corp. ,Pharmx is a registered trademark of Spraying Systems Co. ,Glatt is a registered trademark of Glatt GmbH. , Hosokowa is a registered trademark of Hosokawa Micron Corp., Xcelodose is a registered trademark of Capsugel Belgium BVBA Corp, Omnidose is a trademark of Harro Hoefliger
8
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
4
Introduction to Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Devices
Dry Powder Inhalers Pre-Metered
Reservoir Passive
Active
Multi-Unit Dose
Unit Dose
Multi-Unit Dose
Unit Dose
Multi Unit Dose
Vibration (piezo-electric) Compressed air Capsule 9
Foil blister
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Introduction to Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Devices
Dry Powder Inhalers Pre-Metered
Reservoir Passive
Active
Unit Dose
Multi-Unit Dose
Unit Dose
Multi-Unit Dose
Multi Unit Dose
Vibration (piezo-electric) Compressed air Capsule 10
Foil blister
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
5
Micro-dosing Inhalation Powders What do we mean by micro-dosing? • •
Ordered mixtures, eg. API/carrier particles
Pre-metered powder aliquots Fill weight in the range < 1 – 50 mg
Inhalation powder formulations •
Highly potent drugs
•
Formulations
— low drug concentration Pure API without any further excipients Spherical aggregates Spray-dried or micronized actives Ordered mixtures • API/carrier • API/excipient/carrier blends — Lyophilized, • proteins/peptides — — — —
11
Low density, porous particles
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Micro-dosing Inhalation Powders
Powder Characteristics – Design Space Ideal World
Real World
Low cohesive forces
Particle size/shape
•
Formulation
•
Packaging
Low tendency to agglomerate No compaction Uniform powders Excellent flow
Surface texture Density/porosity Hygroscopicity Oxygen/light sensitivity Electrostatic Powder packing/compaction Age/history Poor flow properties Powder segregation (blends)
Particle-particle interactions dominate API processing & product performance 12
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
6
Micro-dosing Inhalation Powders Control Strategies
Develop “Fit for purpose” products & processes • Clinical product – limit number of input lots (Control) • Commercial product – full chemical & physical characterization across many lots (Understand)
Device Filling • Develop scaleable filling processes — Where possible, same filling mechanism from development through to commercial process
13
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Dosing Pharmaceutical Powders Dosing Principle Flowing Powder Volume
Mechanism of Dosing Auger Screw
Typical Applications Large powder vols
Inhalation Capable 9
Bottle/sachet Reservoir DPI
Flowing Powder Volume (novel)
Fixed Powder Volume
Micro-dosing
9
Vibratory
Micro-dosing
9
Electrostatic deposition
Micro-dosing
9
Dosing Disk/Tamping
Oral capsules
8
Dosing Disk/Dr Blade
Tablets
Dosator
Large powder vols
9
Bottle/sachet Reservoir DPI Drum
14
Micro-dosing
9
Micro-dosing
9
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
7
Early/Clinical Development
Clinical Product
Pre-IND/IMPD
PhI to IIa
Micro-dosing Equipment Fills Niche in R&D, Clinical Trial Materials Tablets & Capsules March 2009
•Manual/Semi-automatic •100 – 5,000 doses •Low/moderate throughput
Powdernium™
Quantos ™ Mettler-Toledo
Symyx Technologies
Xcelodose® Capsugel
15
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Quantos – “Perfect Dosing”
Case Study Micro-dosing system eases clinical manufacturing at Catalent – a solution for inhalation drug delivery Catalent Pharma Solutions, Somerset, NJ, operates a facility in Research Triangle Park, NC, that offers expertise and a full range of services for pulmonary and nasal drug delivery. In 2008, the company was conducting development work on behalf of a client who sought help with a new chemical entity to be delivered via a dry powder inhaler (DPI). Part of development included characterizing the aerosols and the performance of the DPI. "We were working on inhalation drug delivery, and one issue with dry powder inhalers is filling the powder into the dose unit assembly," said Lei Mao, the senior scientist at Catalent who led the formulation development team working on the project……….
16
New inhalation drug development Weighing micronized API Traceable data management
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
8
Product Registration & Commercialisation
Clinical Product
Pre-IND/IMPD
PhI to IIa
•Manual/Semi-auto •100 – 5,000 doses •Low/moderate throughput
Commercial Product
PhIII/ NDA/MAA
PhIIb
Commercial Manufacture
•Semi-auto/automated
•Fully automated
•5,000 – 100,000 doses
•100,000+ doses
•Moderate throughput
•High throughput •In-line process verification
17
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Bridging Process Scale One Approach
Clinical Product
Pre-IND/IMPD
PhI to IIa
Commercial Product
18
8
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
9
Scaleable Dosing for Inhalation Powders Dosing Principle Flowing Powder Volume
Mechanism of Dosing
Typical Applications
Inhalation Capable
Large powder vols
Auger Screw
Scaleable
9
9 (Reservoir?)
Bottle/sachet Reservoir DPI
Flowing Powder Volume (novel)
Fixed Powder Volume
Micro-dosing
9
8
Vibratory
Micro-dosing
9
8
Electrostatic deposition
Micro-dosing
9
?
Dosing Disk/Tamping
Oral capsules
8
8
Dosing Disk/Dr Blade
Tablets
Dosator
Large powder vols
9
9
Micro-dosing
9
9
Micro-dosing
9
9
Bottle/sachet Reservoir DPI Drum
19
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Bridging Filling Process Scale Preferred Approach
Clinical Product
Pre-IND/IMPD
PhI to IIa
Repeatable unit processes (scaleable) Integrated modules/unit functions •
Form, fill, seal, cut, assemble
Moderate to high throughput In-process verification Robustness 20
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
10
Integrated Scale up Path
Clinical Product
Pre-IND/IMPD
PhI to IIa
•Manual/Semi-auto
Omnidose ™ Integtrated Line
•100 – 5,000 doses
•Fully auto
•Low/moderate throughput
Commercial PhIIb Omnidose™ Product
PhIII/ NDA/MAA
Commercial Manufacture
• Semi-auto/auto
Omnidose ™ TT •Manual/Semi-auto
•Semi-auto/automated
•Customized line
•5,000 – 100,000 doses
•High throughput
•Moderate throughput
•In-line blister form/fill/seal/cut •In-line fill/fill weight verification
Images reproduced courtesy of Harro Höfliger AG
21
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Considerations for Filling DPIs • Quality by Design (QbD) Considerations — Development Philosophy — Impact of Device — Impact of Powder
• Mechanisms for Dosing Inhalation Powders Approaches for Filling DPIs • Compare and Contrast Data — Auger Filling — Dosator Filling — Drum Filling
Concluding remarks
22
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
11
Auger Filling Mechanisms Reservoir Device
Auger Filling Optimization of a Multidose DPI Using Quality by Design (QbD) Cantarelli et al, RDD 2010, Vol 2, pp 503-508
Chiesi NEXT™ DPI Fixed dose combination formulation • Mic BDP 100 μg/FF 6 μg • Lactose Monohydrate/Ternary agent (European Patent EP1274406). Fully automated Auger filling system • M.A.R. s.r.l., Milan, Italy Key findings • Powder flowability was critical • Auger Speed, # of revolutions & hopper loading frequency were all significant wrt fill weight • Auger Speed, # of revolutions & hopper loading frequency had no impact on DDU & FPM —
23
Auger filling was “gentle” on powders
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Auger Filling Mechanisms
Micro-dosing: Quantos MicroDosing System ™ Quantos MicroDosing System ™ • Flexibility for use in both R&D laboratory and small scale GMP manufacturing allows direct process transfer • 100% fill weight verification ensures traceability in the GMP manufacturing • Up to 12,000 capsules were manufactured with minimal rejects • Significant manual intervention Product Profile • 25 mg capsule fill weight • API/lactose blend • Delivered Dose (mean = 85-115 % and individual = 75-125% of target dose) • Fine Particle Fraction (25%) and Fine Particle Dose corresponds to > 25% of Delivered Dose
24
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
12
Quantos MicroDosing System ™ Fill Weight Accuracy & Precision
Low dose dry powder filling with excellent accuracy & precision demonstrated using the Quantos MicroDosing System
25
Target Fill Weight (mg)
Quantos Actual Fill Weight (mg)
Confirmatory Actual Fill Weight (mg)
Mean
1
0.981
1.004
RSD
-
2.4
2.8
Mean
2.5
2.429
2.436
RSD
-
2.0
1.9
Mean
5
4.979
4.793
RSD
-
0.9
0.83
Mean
10
10.040
10.020
RSD
-
0.5
0.5
Mean
25
25.048
25.035
RSD
-
0.3
0.3
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Quantos MicroDosing System ™ No Segregation
Excellent correlation between fill weight and assay by HPLC demonstrated no powder segregation occurs during filling 800.0
Capsule assay values (ug)
700.0 600.0 500.0 400.0 300.0 200.0 100.0 0.0 0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Weight measured by Quantos (mg)
26
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
13
Quantos MicroDosing System ™ No Compaction
Fine Particle Dose, Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution, Delivered Dose Comparison for R&D confirmation and cGMP clinical batches R&D Confirmation Batch (n=3)
R &D B at ch ( n=3 )
Clinical Batch (n=3)
C linical B at ch ( n=3 ) 10 0 .0
400.0
800
9 0 .0
350.0
Delivered Dose (µg)
C u mu la tive APSD
NGI Deposition Pattern
700
8 0 .0 300.0
>50% FPD 250.0
600
70 .0 500
6 0 .0
200.0
50 .0
400
150.0
4 0 .0
300
100.0
3 0 .0
200
2 0 .0 50.0
100
10 .0 0.0
0
0 .0 0 .0
0 R&D Bat ch
5.0
Clinical B at ch
C ut o f f d iamet er ( µ m)
27
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
Dosator Filling Mechanisms Dosator with compaction For processing compactable powders with reproducible fill volume • • • • •
Dosing range 10 - 600 mg Fill volume given by plunger height For powders with a Carr‘s index between 15 and 25 % Particle size ideally in the range of 50 to 150 μm Residual powder volume approx. 200 ml
High speed filling • •
Capsule Disk
Image reproduced courtesy of Harro Höfliger AG
28
Considerations & Approaches for Filling Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs) Management Forum, London, July 1 2010
14
MG Planeta
Capsule Filling Filling Accuracy
25 mg fill weight 3 inhalation grade lactoses (DMV Fonterra) • Respitose® ML001
26.00
Respitose SV005
25.00
Respitose ML001 Respitose ML002
24.00 23.00
Respitose® ML002 — — —
•
Milled, broad particle size distribution ‘Mid’ particle size %