COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH & DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH & DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, 30 October 2012 9.00am Board Room, 3rd Floor, The Princess Marg...
Author: Patrick Higgins
1 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH & DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

Tuesday, 30 October 2012 9.00am

Board Room, 3rd Floor, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch

AGENDA COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING To be held in the Board Room, 3rd Floor, the Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch Tuesday 30 October 2012 commencing at 9.00am ADMINISTRATION

9.00am

Apologies 1.

Interest Register Update Committee Interest Register and Declaration of Interest on items to be covered during the meeting.

2.

Confirmation of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting & Matters Arising ƒ 4 September 2012

3.

Carried Forward/Action List Items

REPORTS/PRESENTATIONS

4.

Better Sooner More Convenient Q1 (CPH&DSAC)

5.

Planning & Funding Exception Report (CPH&DSAC)

6.

Drinking Water Quality Issues– Oral Update (As requested previous meeting)

9.15am

Carolyn Gullery General Manager, Planning & Funding Carolyn Gullery Sandy McLean Portfolio Manager, Planning &Funding Evon Currie General Manager, Population Health

9.15am-9.30am

9.30am-10.00am

10.00am-10.15am

(CPH)

MORNING TEA

7.

10.15am-10.30am

Dr Nicola Austin

− Child & Youth Workstream Update – oral update − Introduction Gateway Assessments – oral update − Progress Report B4 Schools Checks – oral update − Early Start Programme – oral update

10.30am-11.30am

Linda Stokes Julie Potter /Jackie Cooper Michael James

(CPH&DSAC)

8.

9.

10.

Christchurch Education Reforms – Public Health Aspects – Oral Update ( as requested Board meeting 20 September 2012) (CPH) Sth Island Public Health Project – Oral Update –as previously requested by the Committee (CPH) Community & Public Health Exception Report (CPH)

ESTIMATED FINISH TIME

AGA - CPHDSAC Agenda- 30 Oct 12

Evon Currie

11.30am-11.50am

Evon Currie

11.50pm-12.05pm

Evon Currie

12.05pm-12.20am 12.20pm

Page 1 of 2

26/10/12

AGENDA INFORMATION ITEMS

− − − −

CPH & Ecan Joint Work Plan Final submission Parental Leave Bill – for information as requested by Committee Chair Briefing Akaroa Weather Event 13 October –- for information as requested by Committee Chair 2013 Meeting Dates – for information as adopted at the 17 October 2012 Board meeting

Date of Next Meeting: 26 February 2013 commencing at 9.00am

AGA - CPHDSAC Agenda- 30 Oct 12

Page 2 of 2

26/10/12

ATTENDANCE

COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Olive Webb (Chair) Peter Ballantyne Anna Crighton Elizabeth Cunningham Wendy Dallas-Katoa Jonathan Darby Andrew Dickerson Wendy Gilchrist Aaron Keown Chris Mene Bruce Matheson David Morrell Mary Richardson Susan Wallace

Executive Support

David Meates – Chief Executive Mary Gordon – Executive Director of Nursing Stella Ward – Executive Director Allied Health Carolyn Gullery - General Manager Planning and Funding Evon Currie – General Manager, Population and Public Health Hector Matthews – Executive Director of Maori & Pacific Health Murray Dickson - General Manager - Corporate Services Kay Jenkins - Executive Assistant - Governance Support Kevin Roche – Assistant Board Secretary

AGA - CPHDSAC Agenda Attendance List - October12

Page 1 of 1

26/10/12

COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS’ INTERESTS REGISTER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ CONFLICTS (As disclosed on appointment to the Board/Committee and updated from time-to-time, as necessary) OLIVE WEBB

Institute of Applied Human Services Limited (IAHS) – Chairperson Provides individual consultation, service advice and workforce training in the Intellectual Disability area, on contract to various individuals and providers in Australasia. New Zealand providers of Intellectual Disability services are usually funded by the Ministry of Health. IAHS has no contracts with Canterbury DHB. Special Olympics New Zealand – Trustee As well as providing sporting events, also provides health screening and assistance. IHC/IDEA Services Assist in introducing government funded annual health checks for people with intellectual disabilities promoting this with GP’s and other primary health care professionals and working to achieve funding for this. Hororata Community Trust - Trustee PETER BALLANTYNE

West Coast District Health Board, Appointed Member – Deputy Chair Bishop Julius Hall of Residence, Trust Board Member University of Canterbury, Council Member The University of Canterbury provides certain services to the Canterbury DHB Deloitte – Consultant Deloitte carries out certain consulting assignments for the Canterbury DHB from time to time. Spouse, Claire Ballantyne is a Canterbury DHB employee (Ophthalmology Department) ANNA CRIGHTON

New Zealand Historic Places Trust – Board Member Governance of New Zealand Heritage. Canterbury DHB owns buildings that may be considered by the Trust to have historical significance. Christchurch Heritage Trust – Trustee - governance of Christchurch Heritage. Historic Places Aotearoa Inc - President ELIZABETH CUNNINGHAM

Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu (TRONT) – Director Governance body for Ngai Tahu Canterbury District Police Advisory Group – Co Chair Item 1 - CPHDSAC - Interest Register - Oct 2012

Page 1 of 6

26/10/12

South Island Oncology Research Group – Chair Manawhenua ki Waitaha - Member Representative of Te Runanga o Koukourata. Manawhenua ki Waitaha is a collective of health representatives of the seven Ngai Tahu Papatipu Runanga that are in the Canterbury DHB area. There is a memorandum of Understanding between Manawhenua ki Waitaha and the Canterbury DHB. Maori Women’s Welfare League – President Rapaki Branch The Maori Women’s Welfare League has contracts through the Ministry of Health for the delivery of health services for Maori. Kawa Whakaruruhau Roopu Bachelor of Nursing/Midwifery Christchurch Polytechnic – Chair A committee of Christchurch Polytechnic, Department of health services, providing input and oversight in relation to course programmes. Registered RMA (Resource Management Act) Commissioner From time to time I am asked to sit on these panels given my involvement with the Regional Council and in particular understanding the Maori issues around Section 8 of the RMA Act. If conflicts arise they will be advised. University of Otago, Christchurch – Research Manager, Maori (0.6FTE) I am part of the Senior Management Team. The University has various relationships with the Canterbury DHB, including medical training, research, the provision of library services, and leasing of premises. WENDY DALLAS-KATOA

Toitū te Kāinga, Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu –Health and Social Development Te Kahui o Papaki ka Tai – Member Maori Advisory Group to Pegasus Health/Partnership Health Manawhenua Ki Waitaha – Trust Member Manawhenua Ki Waitaha is a collective of health representatives of the seven Ngāi Tahu Papatipu Rūnanga that are in the Canterbury DHB area. There is a memorandum of understanding between Manawhenua and the Canterbury DHB. NSP Kaitiaki Advisory Group – MoH Appointed Member Whakaruruhau Komiti – National Breastfeeding Committee Member Partnership Health PHO “Te Kei o te Waka”– Board Member– iwi/manawhenua representative Partnership Health Canterbury is a Primary Health Organisation (PHO). The PHO has entered into an agreement with the Canterbury DHB under which the PHO agreed to provide a range of health care services and the management tasks associated with the delivery and funding of these services. The PHO has the power to subcontract the delivery of any or all such services and associated management tasks. National Health Promotion Forum – Chair, Maori Advisory Group Community Services Service Level Alliance Healthy Christchurch – Steering Committee Item 1 - CPHDSAC - Interest Register - Oct 2012

Page 2 of 6

26/10/12

Ngāi Tahu representative to this Committee

JONATHAN DARBY

Toastmasters International I am a member of two Toastmasters clubs and hold an executive role in one. No conflicts of interest are anticipated regarding my involvement. Parafed Canterbury This organisation provides sporting and other opportunities to people with disabilities. They also provide services to the same. No conflicts of interest are anticipated. Lotteries Individuals with Disabilities Distribution Committee - Member This is a Committee of the Lotteries Commission responsible for allocating grants for mobility and communication equipment to help people with disabilities achieve independence and gain access to the community. No conflicts of interest are anticipated but will be addressed as appropriate should they arise.

ANDREW DICKERSON

Health Care of the Elderly Education Trust - Chair Promotes and supports teaching and research in the area of care of older people. Recipients of financial assistance for research, education or training could include employees of the Canterbury DHB. Canterbury Medical Research Foundation – Member Provides financial assistance for medical research and research facilities in Christchurch. Recipients of financial assistance for research, education or training could include employees of the Canterbury DHB. NZ Historic Places Trust - Member The Trust promotes the identification, preservation and conservation of the historical & cultural heritage of New Zealand. Canterbury District Health Board owns buildings that may be considered by the Trust to have historical significance. No Conflicts of Interest are envisaged for the following interests, but should a conflict arise this will be discussed at the time. NZ Gerontology Association - Member Professional association that promotes the interests of older people and an understanding of ageing. Hope Foundation for Research on Ageing - Member Promotes research on New Zealand’s ageing population and its implications for the future. Osteoporosis (Canterbury) Inc. - Member Provides support, information and advice to people with osteoporosis. Neurological Foundation of New Zealand Inc. - Member

Item 1 - CPHDSAC - Interest Register - Oct 2012

Page 3 of 6

26/10/12

Provides support and information to people with diseases and disorders of the brain and nervous system. Abbeyfield New Zealand Inc. - Member Promotes and establishes community housing for lonely and socially isolated older people using the Abbeyfield model. Consultant I have a private consultancy specialising in management consultancy services (including communication management, communication strategy and marketing) to the not for profit sector, professional associations, social service and public sector agencies. WENDY GILCHRIST

Human Rights Review Tribunal – Appointed Member Tribunal is a statutory body dealing with cases brought under the Human Rights Act 1993, the Privacy Act 1993 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994. Animal Diagnostics Ltd – Accounts Manager Animal Diagnostics is a laboratory dealing in herd testing, part owned by my husband. The company may collaborate with CHL. Member CERA Community Forum This is a community forum formed under the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act to provide the Minister with information and advice on earthquake recovery matters. Child Help Line – Board Member My husband Dr Nigel Gilchrist is employed as a specialist consultant physician with the CDHB. No potential conflict of interest is expected and should this arise it will be declared at that time. Dr Nigel Gilchrist is also the founding Director of the Canterbury Geriatric Medical Research Trust (est 1986), a charitable trust that leases space from Canterbury DHB and also provides some charitable works for the Canterbury DHB at no cost to the Canterbury DHB.

AARON KEOWN

Christchurch City Council and Shirley Papanui Community Board – Member I am an elected member of the Christchurch City Council (CCC) and also a member of the Shirley Papanui Community Board and a member of a number of other Council committees. Canterbury Development Corporation – Director. No conflicts of interest are anticipated from these roles but will be discussed at the appropriate time should they arise. Canterbury Regional Transport Committee - Christchurch City Council Representative Grouse Entertainment – Director and Shareholder BRUCE MATHESON

Brannigans Ltd – Founding Shareholder/Director. Is a human resource consulting business – a potential conflict of interest may exit in the provision of any consulting services to the Canterbury DHB. Item 1 - CPHDSAC - Interest Register - Oct 2012

Page 4 of 6

26/10/12

Freshpork NZ Ltd- Director Engaged in farming, processing and marketing of pork meats in New Zealand – no conflict of interest is anticipated. Southern Engineering Solutions Ltd – Advisory Role Designs and manufactures machinery & equipment for the food processing industry in New Zealand and Australia The McLean Institute – Board of Governors. The Chair of the Canterbury DHB is an ex-officio member of the Board of Governors pursuant to an Act of Parliament. The McLean Institute operates Holly Lea, a rest home which provides residential aged care services under contract with the Canterbury DHB. Snap Internet Ltd - Employed as a Consultant. This company is an internet provider which provides services to the CDHB.

CHRIS MENE

Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology (CPIT) - Advisory Board Member to Bachelor of Applied Science CPIT is a tertiary institution and I contribute as an industry advisor into the Bachelor of Applied Science (with Speciality) degree course. This course includes two specialities which are (1) Physical Activity Health and Wellness and (2) Sports Science. This is a voluntary position. Stopping Violence Services (Canterbury) - Board Member Stopping Violence Services is a social services provider which provides violence prevention services to perpetrators of violence. This is a voluntary position. Shirley-Papanui Community Board (Chairperson) The CCC is a Territorial Local Authority and the Shirley-Papanui Community Board is the statutory body elected to serve that metropolitan ward. I have been elected onto the Community Board and into the role of Community Board Chairperson for the three year period until October 2013. No conflicts of interest are anticipated from this role but will be discussed at the appropriate time should they arise. Canterbury Clinical Network – Project Manager, Child & Youth Workstream Contracted to Pegasus Health Christchurch City Council (CCC) Resource Management Panel Member The CCC is the decision making body for resource consent matters in Christchurch City. I serve occasionally as a panel member. Wayne Francis Charitable Trust - Board Member The Wayne Francis Charitable Trust is a philanthropic family organisation committed to making a positive, and lasting contribution to the community. The Youth focussed Trust funds cancer research which embodies some of the Trust’s fundamental objectives – prevention, long-term change, and actions that strive to benefit the lives of many. Partnership Health Canterbury – Project Manager Partnership Health Canterbury is a Primary Health Organisation and I am contracted to manage projects and facilitate events. No conflicts of interest are anticipated however where there is a perceived or real conflict of interest this will be addressed at the time.

Item 1 - CPHDSAC - Interest Register - Oct 2012

Page 5 of 6

26/10/12

DAVID MORRELL

British Honorary Consul Interest relates to my supporting British nationals and relatives who may be hospitalised arising from injury related accidents, or use other services of the Canterbury DHB, including Mental Health Services. In addition a conflict of interest may arise from time to time in respect to Coroners’ Inquest hearings involving British nationals. Nurses Memorial Chapel Trust –Chair (Canterbury DHB Appointee) Trust responsible for Memorial on the Christchurch Hospital site. Historic Places Trust – Subscribing Member The Trust’s mission is to promote the identification, protection, preservation and conservation of the historical and cultural heritage of New Zealand. The Trust identifies records and acts in respect of significant ancestral sites and buildings. The Trust has already been involved with Canterbury DHB buildings. My wife is a member of the Hospital Ladies Visitors Association – no potential conflict of interest is expected and should this arise it will be declared at that time. Honorary Canon- Christchurch Cathedral The Cathedral congregation runs a food programme in association with Canterbury DHB staff.

MARY RICHARDSON

Christchurch Methodist Mission - Executive Director SUSAN WALLACE

Member – West Coast DHB Appointed board member West Coast DHB Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu - Affiliated Member of TRONT. Māori Women’s Welfare League (MWWL) Member of Maori Women’s Welfare League, is a recipient of Ministry of Health funding for HEHA programmes. Chairperson - Rata Te Awhina Trust Is a West Coast Maori provider affiliated with He Oranga Pounamu and recipient of Ministry of Health funding. Te Waipounamu MWWL -Area Representative to National Executive of MWWL.

Item 1 - CPHDSAC - Interest Register - Oct 2012

Page 6 of 6

26/10/12

 

MINUTES DRAFT MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE held in the Board Room, 3rd Floor The Princess Margaret Hospital on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 commencing at 9.00am

PRESENT

Olive Webb (Chairperson); Peter Ballantyne; Elizabeth Cunningham; Anna Crighton; Wendy DallasKatoa; Jonathan Darby; Andrew Dickerson; Wendy Gilchrist; Bruce Matheson; Chris Mene; David Morrell and Mary Richardson. APOLOGIES

Apologies for absence were received and accepted from Susan Wallace and Aaron Keown. And for lateness from Wendy Gilchrist (arrived at 10.08am). EXECUTIVE SUPPORT

David Meates (Chief Executive); Carolyn Gullery (General Manager, Planning and Funding); Evon Currie (General Manager, Population Health); Katia De Lu (Accountability Coordinator, Planning and Funding); Kay Jenkins (Executive Assistant, Governance Support) and Kevin Roche (Assistant Board Secretary). IN ATTENDANCE Item 4

Dr Daniel Williams – (Community & Public Health) Item 5

Jane Cartwright – (CEO, Partnership Health) Janice Donaldson – (Project Facilitator) Item 6

Hector Matthews – (Executive Director, Māori & Pacific Health) 1. INTEREST REGISTER

Chris Mene noted changes had been previously advised under separate cover. Wendy Dallas-Katoa advised she would be providing some amendments to her existing declaration. There were no other declarations of conflicts of interest in respect to the agenda for the meeting or amendments to the interest register. 2.

MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING AND MATTERS ARISING

Resolved (06/12) (Moved: Anna Crighton; Seconded: Elizabeth Cunningham - carried) “That the minutes of the meeting of the Community and Public Health and Disability Support Advisory Committee held on 3 July 2012 be confirmed as a true and correct record” MINS-CPHDSAC- Sep 2012

Page 1 of 7

19/10/11

It was noted that a presentation on Health Hubs would be made to the meeting of the QFARC that afternoon 3.

CARRIED FORWARD/ACTION LIST ITEMS

The Committee noted the carried forward list.. (Mary Richardson arrived at 9.08am) 4.

CORE FUNCTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH -PRESENTATION

(CPH & DSAC) Dr Daniel Williams, Community and Public Health (CPH) provided a presentation outlining the Core Functions of Public Health. Included with the agenda had been a copy of the 2011 report of the NZ Public Health Clinical network “Core Public Health Functions for NZ”. The objective of that report had been to assist the Ministry of Health and DHBs in optimising public health service delivery. The presentation provided information on: ƒ A health system that keeps people healthy – and the outcomes achieved from this. ƒ The history of public health in NZ - including the core functions project. ƒ The principles of public health. ƒ The core public health functions: − Health assessment and surveillance, understanding health status, health determinants, and disease distribution. − Public health capacity development ensuring services are effective and efficient. − Health promotion enabling people to increase control over and improve their health. − Health protection protecting communities against public health hazards. − Preventive interventions, population programmes delivered to individuals. ƒ The implications of this for the Ministry of Health, Community and Public Health, South Island Public Health Partnership, and Canterbury Health System. The Committee discussed the presentation with Dr Williams and issues raised related to: ƒ The possible impacts of the proposed Local Government Amendment Bill on the public health aspects of Local Authorities’ work and in particular the determinants of health, and the extent to which the new legislation might divert and minimise the work of TLAs in this area of public health. ƒ Dr Williams explained that while the viewpoint of Community and Public Health had not been formally submitted to the Select Committee their views had, however, been incorporated into the submission lodged by a PHO. The CEO commented that it seemed this legislation did not mesh very well with the overall policy objectives in relation to public health. The General Manager Population Health commented that she saw some real risks of moving away from the current close working relationships with TLAs e.g. Dr Anna Stevenson working for both the Christchurch City Council and Community and Public Health. The Committee noted the work being done collaboratively by Community and Public Health (CPH), outside of a legal framework with Local Authorities, on health issues via multi agency initiatives such as Healthy Christchurch. ƒ The potential risks that now existed from internal air travel – Dr Williams advised that air travel was included in the report and border control was part of the core functions of public health. ƒ The involvement of the Education sector in health – Dr Williams commented that he saw education as a key partner with public health nurses involved/visiting schools. ƒ Funding - Community and Public Health tried to make the most of the resources available. MINS-CPHDSAC- Sep 2012

Page 2 of 7

19/10/11

ƒ

The article in the Listener which stated that of the 21,000 homes with over $100k of damage in Canterbury only 150 had been fixed to date. Dr Williams agreed that this was an issue for public health and also mental health. ƒ If the core functions of CPH were constrained by budget? It was advised that CPH were constantly challenging how they worked and were not stuck on historical practices. Evon advised that they were not in a position of not doing work due to a lack of funding and had sufficient funding to do priorities. . The Committee received the presentation.

5.

HEALTHY HOMES – PRESENTATION

Evon Currie, General Manager Population Health and Jane Cartwright, CEO Partnership Health and Janice Donaldson, Project Facilitator provided a presentation outlining the Healthy Homes initiative. Evon Currie provided an introduction to the presentation and she noted that warm housing had been an issue since before the earthquakes. She said the position statement adopted by the Canterbury DHB in 2012 on air quality and home heating had clarified the CDHB position and that it was an area were the Canterbury DHB could make a difference. They worked with primary care, Ministry of Social Development, CERA and other organisations. The topic of housing was an ongoing one for CERA and she also tabled for information a copy of the key Canterbury indicators as at August 2012, produced by the Department of Building & Housing, showing the upwards movement in rents and house prices in the Canterbury region. This showed that house rentals in the last three months had risen by significant increases. Jane Cartwright and Janice Donaldson then spoke to a PowerPoint presentation which provided information on: ƒ The Health Focussed Housing Strategy – CDHB position statement of June 2012 , Healthy Christchurch Framework, the agreed high level strategic direction for Canterbury. ƒ Canterbury Health System Opportunities for action: − Advocacy The health sector is in a strong position to advocate on housing and housing quality − Report on the impact of housing related issues on health - health can capture information and support research on the effects of poor housing on people’s health and wellbeing, enabling better targeting and advocacy. − Identify people with health and housing risks, and link with appropriate support - health has opportunities to engage with people and identify those most at risk of housing-related health issues. − Funding and/or partnering specific actions - Housing-related investment e.g. Healthy Housing and Warm Families projects. − Openness to referrals for help − Selected current activities – Sustainable homes working party (CERA-led): aims to positively impact rebuild. − Warmer Canterbury working group (Health-led): joined up activity over winter. − Well evidenced input into Draft City Plan, 100-day plan etc: impact at design stage. − Winter Warmth brochures & packs. − Support for Home Energy Checks (CEA); CPH/CEA calendar. − Healthy Homes & Warm Families projects. ƒ The Healthy Homes Project - Phase 1 and Phase 2 - 5 partners in this project. ƒ Proactive warm families. ƒ Making a difference. MINS-CPHDSAC- Sep 2012

Page 3 of 7

19/10/11

Jane Cartwright then spoke on the Healthy Homes Project. Partnership Health PHO was not the only organisation in this project, there were five partners in total which provided funding. She noted that the non EQC policy statement regarding the installation of insulation at the time of earthquake repairs might be reviewed. She also tabled a draft copy of the Home Heating Guidelines. The Committee noted: ƒ The advice of Evon Currie regarding the significant number of people who die each year from housing related issues. ƒ The extent to which progress was being made in improving insulation in homes. There was still a need to look at how information was being received. ƒ The minimum standards required for rental housing - and how the standards of rental housing might be influenced. ƒ The draft pamphlet that had been produced on home heating – this was considered to be an excellent document. The Committee received the presentation noting the need for the CDHB to be seen as “visibly aggressive” on these issues relating to healthy homes.. 6.

MAORI & PACIFIC HEALTH REPORT

The Executive Director, Māori & Pacific Health, Hector Matthews spoke to the report. He commented that Māori & Pacific Health was not a discrete activity e.g. housing pressures also impacted on the Māori and Pacific communities. While there were some discrete services when engaging with the community, most contact occurred in services such as GP and public health nurses etc. The position and role of Manawhenua ki Waitaha in the health sector was then explained together with information on the Māori & Pacific providers in the Canterbury DHB area. As previously requested Mr Matthews spoke to the update on the Rangatahi Work Programme contained in the report. The Committee then took the opportunity to discuss the report and issues raised related to: ƒ The possible closure of schools by the Ministry of Education in Christchurch which had a significant number of Maori & Pacific students. ƒ A presentation to the Committee from the Pacific Reference Group is also to be arranged. ƒ Additional information on the progress against the Māori Health Action plan for the 2011/12 year was also provided by the General Manager, Planning & Funding, Carolyn Gullery. She drew attention to the percentage of the total population enrolled with a PHO and the gap in respect to Māori enrolment and commented she expected there would always be a gap, the issue was how Maori identified themselves when they enrolled as opposed to what they had stated in the census. ƒ Cervical cancer - work is under way to bring this into line with the service provided for breast screening. The Committee noted the report. 7.

PLANNING & FUNDING EXCEPTION REPORT

(CPHDSAC & DSAC) The General Manager, Planning and Funding, Carolyn Gullery spoke to the report and invited Committee Members to ask questions. MINS-CPHDSAC- Sep 2012

Page 4 of 7

19/10/11

Matters then discussed by the Committee related to: ƒ The improvements underway to make the alcohol and other drug (AOD) service more flexible and responsive. It was agreed that the Planning and Funding Portfolio Manager would make a presentation to a future meeting of the Committee on this initiative. ƒ Delays to acute surgery – the CEO advised that capacity for acute surgery had been extended – one of the issues over the next five years, however, would be capacity constraints. ƒ Acute readmission rates for mental health and if the increase over the last 3-4 months represented a trend. The General Manager Planning and Funding advised there had been a slight increase in the length of stay (LOS) but it was not possible to tell at this stage if this was a trend. Information on this would be brought back to the next meeting. ƒ Under 18 years of age flu vaccinations were down in comparison with the previous year – was there a reason for this? Ms Gullery advised that research was being undertaken to try and establish the reasons for this. ƒ Services for youth, children and babies - the Canterbury DHB is establishing a child youth workstream as part of the Canterbury Clinical Network and more activity would be seen over the next year. It was suggested a presentation on this come back to the Committee. ƒ Maternity Journey – information on Māori engagement was provided in the report. The Committee noted the update 8.

BETTER SOONER MORE CONVENIENT Q4

(CPH&DSAC) The General Manager, Planning and Funding Carolyn Gullery spoke to the report which provided a quarterly update on progress with the implementation of the Better, Sooner, More Convenient (BSMC) Business Case for the fourth quarter to 30 June 2012. The report provided a summary of key achievements, followed by progress against the BSMC year two deliverables. Ms Gullery advised that the Canterbury DHB was making significant gains in a number of areas. In respect to ARC (aged residential care) admission rates for both over 65 year olds and acute admission rates for over 65 year olds, the rates were both declining which released funding for investment in other areas. There had been a 50% reduction in admissions post CREST against the 10% expected. In response to a question about the achievement against the targets for Leadership and Support it was noted that while the Leadership and Support service level alliance (SLA) had not been able to agree on plans for restructure the amalgamation of Partnership Health PHO and Pegasus Health was proceeding. The Committee noted the report.

9.

HEALTH TARGETS Q4

(C&PH) Carolyn Gullery, General Manager Planning and Funding spoke to this report which provided information on the Canterbury DHB’s progress against the National Health Targets for Quarter 4 (April – June 2012.) The Committee discussed the report and in particular: MINS-CPHDSAC- Sep 2012

Page 5 of 7

19/10/11

ƒ

ƒ

The national DHB comparison tables in relation to Heart & Diabetes Checks and the performance of the Canterbury DHB at the bottom of this table with only a 20 % rating. It was advised that it was unlikely the Canterbury DHB would achieve this as it was a cumulative target over five years and the CDHB had started late. Practices were instead concentrating on those at risk. Shorter stays in ED – and the COPD taskforce. It was noted that over recent months St Johns had been involved in the diversion of some patients away from ED to GPs. This was, however, about to stop. The Board Chair also mentioned the need for the Canterbury DHB to make more public the work it had done in avoiding gridlock over this period.

The Committee noted the report. 10.

COMMUNITY & PUBLIC HEALTH (CPH) EXCEPTION REPORTS

(CPH) Evon Currie, General Manager Population Health spoke to this report which provided exception reporting against the Canterbury DHBs key priorities, annual plan and core directions. The report was taken as read. In addition the Medical Officers of Health, Dr Ramon Pink and Dr Alistair Humphrey attended to allow for discussion by the Committee on the issue of drinking water quality, and the recent contamination of drinking water and disease outbreaks in two local authority areas within the Canterbury DHB district. The Committee discussed at some length the issue of representation on the Environment Canterbury Water Management Committees by both CPH staff and Board members at governance level and noted that CPH did, however, still provide technical advice to the Zone Committees. In respect to the recent contamination of water supplies in the Darfield area Dr Humphrey explained that normally a multi barrier approach was taken by TLAs to avoid contamination which included protection of the source supply , reticulation system and water treatment if required. In this instance there had been a lack of communication to users in a timely manner and failure to chlorinate the supply. It was noted that there would soon be a governance meeting with ECan at which this issue could be discussed. A work plan was also about to signed with ECAN. The Committee resolved Resolved (06/12) (Moved: Anna Crighton; Seconded: Elizabeth Cunningham - carried) Resolution: i. That the Committee express to the Board its concern at the low quality standard of drinking water within some areas of Canterbury, and asks Community & Public Health to report back to it with a proposal how this might be improved with specific emphasis on governance issues.  

INFORMATION ITEMS

-

CCC Community Board Area Profiles

MINS-CPHDSAC- Sep 2012

Page 6 of 7

19/10/11

-

South Island Alcohol Position Statement (As adopted Board meeting 19 July 2012)

There being no further business the meeting concluded at 12.06 pm .

Confirmed as a true and correct record: ___________________ Olive Webb Chair

MINS-CPHDSAC- Sep 2012

____________________ Date

Page 7 of 7

19/10/11

CARRIED FORWARD/ACTION ITEMS COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND DISABILITY SUPPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE CARRIED FORWARD/ACTION ITEMS AS AT 30 OCTOBER 2012 DATE

ACTION

COMMENTARY

STATUS

2009

1.

18 June 2009

Survey of People with Disabilities - experience with Canterbury DHB services

Update provided to 28 February 2012 meeting – opportunities exist for web based survey once new CDHB web site fully developed. /established – to be kept under review. New CDHB working group has also now been established to develop a patient experience survey – possibility might be incorporated.

Under review.

2.

20 August 2009

NZ Disability Strategy – Formulation of a CDHB Disability Action Plan

CDHB Disability Action Plan to be prepared based on 2001 MoH Disability Services Strategic Plan – Chief Medical Officer sponsor.

Draft plan prepared and presented to EMT – No further update available

3.

17 May Board

Presentation on Early Childhood Programmes

Incorporated with Child & Youth Workstream presentation

On agenda for today’s meeting

4.

3 July 12

Disability Support - Update

Paper to 3 July 2012 CPH&DSAC - update to come back to the Committee in 6 months time following referral to EMT

Scheduled for February 2013 meeting

5.

3 July 12

Pacific Health Presentation - including Pacific Reference Group

Pacific Reference Group to report to the Committee

For CPAC February 2013 meeting

2012

Item 3 - CPHDSAC October 12 -Carried Forward Action Items

Page 1 of 1

26/10/12

BSMC PROGRESS UPDATE – Q1 2012/13 TO:

Chair and Members Community and Public Health & Disability Support Advisory Committee

SOURCE:

Planning & Funding

DATE:

30 October 2012

Report Status – For:

1.

Decision †

Noting

Information

†

ORIGIN OF THE REPORT

This report is submitted to the Ministry on a quarterly basis as an update on progress with the implementation of the Better, Sooner, More Convenient (BSMC) Business Case. 2.

RECOMMENDATION

That the Community and Public Health & Disability Support Advisory Committee notes the content of the first quarter BSMC progress report. 3.

SUMMARY

This report includes a bulleted summary of key achievements, followed by progress against the BSMC Year Three Deliverables. 4.

APPENDICES

Appendix 1:

BSMC Progress Report – Q1 2012/13

Report prepared by:

Katia De Lu, Accountability Coordinator, Planning & Funding

Report approved for release by:

Carolyn Gullery, General Manager, Planning & Funding

CPHDSAC-Oct 12-BSMC Q1

Page 1 of 1

26/10/12

Better, Sooner, More Convenient  Canterbury’s Progress Report – Quarter 1 2012/13 (July to September 2012)                                                                    

 

 

Contents  What does ‘Better, Sooner, More Convenient’ mean for the Canterbury community? ............................................................ 3  Services Closer to Home ........................................................................................................................................................ 3  Delivering on Ministry expectations .......................................................................................................................................... 4  Year Three deliverables ......................................................................................................................................................... 4  Flexible Funding Pool ............................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.  Free afterhours care for children under six ........................................................................................................................... 4  Alliancing & clinical leadership .............................................................................................................................................. 4  Community pharmacy ............................................................................................................................................................ 4  Nursing services ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5  Health needs analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 5  Improved outcomes ............................................................................................................................................................... 5  Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6  Year Three Deliverables ............................................................................................................................................................. 7  1 

Urgent care ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 



Aged care .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 



Children and youth health ........................................................................................................................................ 13 



Primary and secondary integration ........................................................................................................................... 15 



Urban integrated family health and social service networks .................................................................................... 15 



Rural health workstream .......................................................................................................................................... 16 



Long‐term conditions ................................................................................................................................................ 17  Respiratory disease ................................................................................................................................................... 17  Diabetes .................................................................................................................................................................... 19  Cardiovascular disease .............................................................................................................................................. 21 



Māori health ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 



Pacific health ............................................................................................................................................................. 23 

10 

Communication......................................................................................................................................................... 23 

11 

Information technology ............................................................................................................................................ 24 

12 

Alliancing ................................................................................................................................................................... 25 

13 

Diagnostic services .................................................................................................................................................... 25 

14 

Community pharmacy ............................................................................................................................................... 26 

15 

Laboratory ................................................................................................................................................................ 26 

16 

Flexible funding pool ................................................................................................................................................. 27 

17 

Immunisation ............................................................................................................................................................ 27 

   

 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 



What does ‘Better, Sooner, More Convenient’ mean for the Canterbury  community?  The Canterbury Health System is continuing to work to:  ƒ

Develop and realign services to support people/whānau to take increased responsibility for their own health; 

ƒ

Develop primary health care and community services to support people/whānau in a community‐based setting  and provide a single point of ongoing continuity (usually general practice); and 

ƒ

Release secondary care based specialist resources to be responsive to episodic events and the provision of  support to primary care. 

Services Closer to Home  During the first quarter of 2012/13 (July to September 2012):  ƒ

Four Integrated Family Health Centres provided services to their local communities in Amuri, Methven, Rakaia  and Kaiapoi.  More IFHCs (urban and rural) are under development – see page 15. 

ƒ

473 people have been referred to the Community‐Based Falls Prevention Service. 

ƒ

The CREST service supported 490 people: 442 on discharge from hospital and 48 referrals directly from general  practice, supporting these people with home‐based rehabilitation services. 

ƒ

Canterbury’s new Medication Management Service delivered 358 first reviews and 273 follow‐ups, helping  people to better manage their medications. 

ƒ

Cantabrians received 403 spirometry tests and 217 sleep assessments in the community, without the need for a  hospital visit.  

ƒ

Cantabrians received 769 services like steroid injections and aspirations through general practice (495) or the  Community Musculoskeletal Service (274), without having to wait for a hospital orthopaedic appointment. 

ƒ

Cantabrians received 532 subsidised skin lesion excisions, 49 subsidised mirena insertions and 85 subsidised  pipelle biopsies from GPs in the community, without the need for a hospital visit. 

ƒ

162 patients received diabetes self management support from their GP team under one of Canterbury’s two  diabetes subsidies: 84 when first diagnosed and 78 to learn how to use insulin.   

ƒ

12,865 calls to general practices were answered by the nurse‐led afterhours phone triage service available  throughout Canterbury, providing callers with afterhours health advice and guidance.  

ƒ

Canterbury’s Acute Demand Management Services accepted 7,190 referrals – ensuring these people received  the urgent care they needed in the community without having to go to ED. 

ƒ

94% of people attending a Canterbury ED were admitted or discharged within 6 hours, just slightly short of the  Health Target in spite of a difficult flu season. 

ƒ

13 Appetite for Life healthy lifestyle courses have been delivered to help people make small changes that make  a big difference to their health and wellbeing.  

ƒ

91% of eight‐month‐olds were fully immunised, protecting them from a range of preventable illnesses and  achieving the new Health Target of 85%. The target was also achieved for Māori (88%) and Pacific (94%) eight‐ month‐olds. 

ƒ

Canterbury health professionals made 22,050 referrals through the Electronic Referral Management System,  ensuring prompt care for their patients through accurate and complete referrals to the most appropriate  provider.  

ƒ

10,085 referrals have been submitted to Community Referred Radiology, ensuring prompt diagnoses for  patients in the community, without the need for a specialist referral. 90% of these referrals were accepted,  showing the high quality of referrals and GP referring practices. 

ƒ

Health professionals had access to 610 pathways, referral pages and other resources on the Health Pathways  website, assisting them to provide consistent and integrated care to their patients. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

 



Delivering on Ministry expectations  Year Three deliverables  Ministry requirement: Quarterly reports outlining progress against the key deliverables in the jointly agreed Year Three  Implementation Plans, including resolution plans for any areas of slippage against deliverables.  Progress against each of the key deliverables in the Year Three Implementation Plan is outlined from page 7. 

Free afterhours care for children under six  Ministry requirement: In quarter one, confirm 60% coverage level for free afterhours for children under the age of six as of  July 2012. Report progress against increasing this service coverage level to 75% by June 2013. Identification of and progress  against the activities to ensure free afterhours services to children under six years of age.  85% of Canterbury children under six now have access to free afterhours care. Sections 1.1 and 3.3 provide further detail. 

Alliancing & clinical leadership  Ministry requirement: Description of how all necessary clinicians and managers (primary/community and secondary) will  be involved ongoing in the process of development, delivery and review.  The Canterbury Clinical Network (CCN) is an alliance of the region's health leaders.  Established with the explicit inclusion  of the DHB as a key partner, the group also includes urban and rural GPs, nurses, hospital specialists, pharmacists, wider  primary care providers, allied health professionals, NGOs, Māori and Pacific health providers, and relevant community  groups, along with Manawhenua ki Waitaha, PHO and IPA representatives. The group is transforming health care to  significantly improve the delivery of patient care in the community, with a ‘whole of system’ approach to performance.  The Alliance Leadership Team (ALT) oversees the Network’s strategic direction and directs the prioritisation of work within  the programme.  Its membership is predominantly clinical, with eight out of twelve members identifying as clinicians.  The following workstreams (led by clinicians, with predominantly clinical membership) are in place:  ƒ

Aged Care 

ƒ

Mental Health 

ƒ

Child and Youth 

ƒ

Rural 

ƒ

Pacific Health 

Other groups fulfil the functions of workstreams in the areas of:  ƒ

Māori Health 

Active Service Level Alliances (SLAs) are in place for: ƒ

Acute Demand Management Services 

ƒ

Immunisation 

ƒ

Aged Residential Care 

ƒ

Kaikoura Health 

ƒ

Community Services (community nursing and  home services) and subgroups 

ƒ

Laboratory 

ƒ

Pharmacy 

Flexible Funding Pool 

ƒ

Radiology  

ƒ

Projects are underway focussing on structural supports for the changes being put in place by the workstreams and SLAs;  these include Integrated Family Health Services and the Collaborative Care Programme.  Over the past 12 months, more than 360 people have engaged in planning through the CCN to improve the way that the  Canterbury health system works.  This includes more than 160 doctors, 80 nurses and 60 pharmacists, along with allied  health professionals, consumers, clinical managers and managers.  The engagement of organisations with the CCN approach is defined within the CCN District Alliance Agreement. Individuals  working within the ALT and SLAs signify their alignment with the objectives and values of the Network through signing the  CCN Charter. Refer to section 12 for progress on broadening the range of partners within the Alliance Framework. 

Community pharmacy  Ministry requirement: Activities to integrate community pharmacy.  6 community pharmacies have joined the district level alliance and are acting as demonstration sites for new dispensing  arrangements that support providing expert advice to prescribers and patients. Refer to section 14 for more information.  Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 



Nursing services  Ministry requirement: Activities to expand and integrate nursing services.  Current activity is focused on the development of coordination roles that will sit within IFHCs and general practice outside  of these centres.  These roles will include the identification of people who require more assistance to remain healthy in the  community, agreeing care plans, putting these in place and ensuring that plans are carried out. 

Health needs analysis  Ministry requirement: Evidence of health needs analysis of population by localities.  A range of initiatives are at various stages of development that work to match health need to the services provided to the  people of Canterbury.  Pacific and Māori Primary Healthcare reports have been developed, which assess outcome and process measures relating  to these populations.    The Integrated Family Health Service (IFHS) project includes several components that assess the health needs of the  enrolled populations in order to inform service planning.  This includes:  ƒ

Analysis of enrolled populations and their use of healthcare services is carried out to inform the urban IFHCs and  local populations for other developments (such as the Kaikoura IFHC, Rangiora Hub and Ashburton IFHC).   Analysis includes consideration of population dynamics in future years.   

ƒ

The various developments also focus on the perceived highest area of need for development of new models of  care. 

ƒ

Risk stratification of the population to assess likelihood of hospital admission or readmission and will develop  responses to support people to stay healthy in the community. 

The health of older people has been prioritised for specific attention in Canterbury, based on the level of need driven by  demographics and health system behaviour. 

Improved outcomes  Ministry requirement: Identification of targeted areas/patient groups for improved outcomes as a result of enhanced  primary and community service delivery (with a focus on managing long‐term conditions) including:  a.

Identification of and achievement against targets for the number of people that are expected to be appropriately  managed in primary/community setting instead of secondary care 

b.

Identification of and achievement against targets for growth reduction in ED attendance, acute inpatient admissions  and bed days 

c.

Identification of and achievement against a target for the prevention of readmissions for the 75+ population (and any  other target populations) 

d.

Identification of, and achievement against, new service activity in quantified patient terms 

Updates on service improvements for the management of long‐term conditions – particularly cardiovascular disease (CVD),  diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and stroke – can be found in section 7.  a & d.  

Achievements regarding people being appropriately managed in community (rather than hospital) settings and  new service activity in quantified in patient terms are outlined throughout this report, with key achievements  highlighted on page 3. 

b.  

Section 1 outlines the urgent care workstream’s progress in ensuring that only people who need hospital services  present at ED and that others receive timely and appropriate urgent care in the community. 

c.  

Section 2 outlines the aged care workstream’s progress in supporting older people to live well in their own  homes and communities, with services such as CREST (2.1) and the Community Falls Prevention Service (2.5)  working to prevent hospital admission and readmission amongst the 75+ population.   In addition, section 7.5 highlights the work underway to better support patients with COPD in the community and  hence reduce admission and readmission rates for this target population. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 



Infrastructure  Ministry requirement: Identification of and activities (with timeline) to ensure infrastructure and revenue streams  appropriate to support the identified change in activities and service delivery model. Progress against the above  infrastructure and revenue stream milestones.  Supporting infrastructure includes HealthPathways (see section 4), Integrated Family Health Centres both urban (section 5)  and rural (section 6) and a wide range of information technology solutions (section 11). The Flexible Funding Pool (section  16 and page Error! Bookmark not defined.) supports service delivery.  Work is underway to design two community hubs; one in central Christchurch and one in Rangiora.  These facilities will  provide services that are specialist in nature but do not require access to the full range of functions provided within a  hospital.  Clinicians are heavily involved in this planning work to ensure that services provided in these centres are able to  be safely provided outside of a hospital and that the critical mass of the hospital system is not damaged.  The aim is to ensure that people are able to access a greater range of services closer to home and in a more timely way  than has been available in the past.  The types of services that are being considered include: urgent care (24 hour) services, ambulance, primary birthing,  diagnostics, coordination of services and community services.  Further detail will be provided following further  engagement with clinical leadership.   

Status indicators  Result 

Meaning 



We have completed the target. 

 

Positive progress is underway towards delivering  the output as planned or before the planned date. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

 

8  C 

 

We have not completed the target.  Positive progress is underway towards delivering the  planned output although it will be late. 



Year Three Deliverables  1 

Urgent care    Action 

Target 

By 

Status 

1.1   Review afterhours utilisation by children  under six and agree protocols for free afterhours access  in line with national timeframes. 

60% of the population under six have access to  free afterhours care 

Q1 



Support GP practices to provide a free afterhours nurse  phone advice and triage service. 

75% of the population under six have access to  free afterhours care 

Q4 



1.2  Continue to develop and refine acute demand  services to target patients with the greatest capacity to  benefit and support those with a high level of need to  access appropriate urgent care in the community rather  than in hospitals 

1.3  Engage St John Ambulance crews to use the  Ambulance Referral Pathway and acute demand  services to safely manage appropriate patients in the  community. 

1.4  Enable proactive management of vulnerable  patients in the community, including community  observation and increased access to urgent diagnostics.  Continue to promote calling general practice as first  point of contact (phone) 24/7. 

                                                                         1

 Data will be provided annually in the Quarter 4 report. 

>18,000 urgent care packages provided in the  community. 

>250 patients utilise the ambulance referral  pathway. 

The proportion of the population presenting to  ED will remain below 18%. 

Q4 

Q4 

Q41 

 

 

 

Current Achievement/Progress  85% of Canterbury’s population under the age of six has access to  free afterhours care on the basis of an interim arrangement that has  been put in place with afterhours providers.  A long‐term solution is being developed.  Growth in Acute Demand Management Services (ADMS) referral  volumes have continued, with 7,190 referrals during Quarter 1.   Average daily referrals in September were 84 per day (the same  period last year was 56 per day).  This rate of referrals is ahead of  the rate required to achieve the annual target and ensures patients  receive community‐based urgent care where clinically appropriate.  The Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) workstream is  now demonstrating results, with a significant percentage of patients  with COPD being diverted through the agreed COPD Ambulance  pathway to primary care settings.   The information from St. John shows that in the 3 months from July  to September, 214 patients were diverted to primary care  environments to be managed rather than to ED. In July this  represented 19%, August 42% and in September 40% of the overall  number of patients presenting with this condition.  Despite the significant challenges of influenza over the last quarter,  very early indications are starting to show that there is a decrease in  hospital attendances and admissions with a respiratory coded  problem over the last 4‐6 weeks. We are continuing to monitor this  on a week‐by‐week basis.  Acute Demand liaison teams within the hospital and ED continue to 



Reduction in the growth rate of acute medical  admissions. 

Q41 

 

Target 

By 

Status 

>1,100 people (65+) supported by CREST on  discharge or direct GP referral. 

Q4 

 

200 people (65+) supported by CREST upon  direct GP referral. 

Q4 



20% reduction in acute hospital admissions for  people supported by CREST services. 

Q41 

 

10% reduction in acute readmissions for  people supported by CREST. 

1 Q4  

 

have a strong presence to enable patients to be ‘pulled’ from the  hospital into primary care and community with the support of the  Acute Demand nursing and medical teams. This is currently resulting  in 50‐70 patients being pulled from the hospital on a monthly basis.   The management of frequent ED attendees is currently progressing,  and care plans are being produced for this cohort of patients at a  rate of around 10 care plans per week. We now have in place over  330 comprehensive, multidisciplinary care plans for these patients.  An increase in over 200 in the last quarter. 

Aged care  Action 

2.1  Improve early intervention to support people  with deteriorating health.  CREST (Community  Rehabilitation and Enablement Support Team) will be  rolled out to maximum capacity by December 2012. 

Current Achievement/Progress 

CREST now is actively receiving referrals from Christchurch,  Burwood and Princess Margaret Hospitals and some general  practices.  Over the past four months, CREST has rolled out to ED at  Christchurch Hospital and working with Orthopaedic clients.    Since 5 April 2011, 1,665 clients have used the CREST service, with  490 of these clients being for the period of 1 July to 30 September.  48 of these clients were from direct GP referral.  The Cognitive Impairment Pathway has been implemented. 

2.2   Implement the HealthPathways Cognitive  Impairment Pathway to improve the community care of  people with early dementia and memory loss. 

2.3  Provide ‘Walking in Others’ Shoes’ dementia  education training for community service providers. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

Pathway implemented. 

Q1 



Tailored dementia training programmes  running. 

Q1 



Regular monitoring of referrals and service  provision. 

Q2 

 

 

A concern is the apparent low rate of referral to Alzheimers  Canterbury by primary care.  Strategies to increase awareness and  other measures are being taken to increase referral rates from  general practice.  Data is being sought on prescribing of anti‐ cholinergic drugs. 

Home Based Support Services (HBSS) ‘Walking in Others’ Shoes’  training is due to commence in November 2012. 



Since MMS started, more pharmacists have completed MUR training  (104 to 184) and accreditation for MUR (45 to 90).  While the number of MMS referrals is tracking slightly above target  for this quarter, not all of these referrals will result in a medicine  review (see below).  561 referrals were received in Q1, averaging 43  per week (slightly lower than the weekly average during the  previous year).   

2,000 MMS services completed. 



Q4 

2.4  Reduce harm from adverse medication  reactions and optimize medicines use.  Fully implement  the Medication Management Service (MMS). 

The implementation of the new Pharmacy Services contract saw a  drop‐off of referrals from community pharmacists as they focus on  signing up long‐term condition patients.  It is expected that this  effect will pass.  Automatic referral of CREST patients to MMS continues, although  not all of these meet MMS service criteria.    So far this year, 101 people (18%) have been discharged from the  service prior to the first consultation for a variety of reasons.  Work  is being done to generate more referrals that will meet criteria and  to reduce patient refusals.  358 initial outcome reports have been received (102 arey et to be  received). There is currently a 40/60 split between the mobile  pharmacists and community pharmacy. For patients over 65, 284  initial outcome reports have been received, i.e. 79% of  consultations. 

2.5   Reduce harm from falls amongst people aged  over 65.  Implement the Community Falls Prevention  Service with Falls Champions. Integrate falls prevention  strategies across the sector. Train primary care teams. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

MMS service reports on outcomes. 

Q4 

 

>800 people (65+) access community‐based  falls prevention services. 

Q4 

 

10% reduction in the proportion of the  population (75+) presenting at ED as a result of  a fall. 

Q4 

 

 

273 follow‐up reports have been received. Mobile pharmacists  transfer a number of patients to community pharmacy after their  initial consultation for follow‐up.  For patients over 65, 250 follow‐ up reports have been received, i.e. 92%.  MMS is reducing the need for Medication Oversight (MO) visits.  The  number of MO visits saved will be significant and will be reported in  a subsequent quarter.  By 30 September a total of, 1,163 people have been referred to the  Community‐based Falls Prevention Service since it began on 1  February 2012. This is significant, as the target was set at 800  referrals for 12 months.  This includes 473 referrals during the first  quarter of 2012/13.  Over half of the referrals are from primary care 



10% reduction in the proportion of the  population (75+) admitted to hospital as a  result of a fall. 

2.6  Promote “zero harm from falls” in inpatient  settings including Aged Residential Care (ARC). 

75% of ARC residents are receiving Vitamin D  supplements. 

and the community sector.    Trend data are being collected. Data on the proportions of the 75+  population presenting at ED or admitted as a result of a fall will be  provided in the Quarter 4. 

 

Q4 

 

Q4 

A falls prevention DVD is being distributed to all ARC facilities by the  ACC Community Injuries Prevention Officer.  The DVD interview  between Carl Hanger and Professor John Campbell includes  strategies for falls prevention quality improvement in ARC.   Vitamin D in ARC data is currently unavailable from MoH, but we  expect this to be available for the next report.  Service implementation commenced on schedule on 1 July 2012. All  new service users will commence on the revised model, and existing  service users will be transitioned at review.  

2.7  The phased rollout in Christchurch of the  restorative home support model was put on hold in  2011/12 due to post‐earthquake changes in priority.   This is to be continued in 2012/13. 

Rollout to be 75% complete by June 2013. 

 

Q4 

The service has been developed and is operating within an alliance  framework through the Community Services SLA (CSSLA) formed in  late 2011.  The SLA and its two subgroups, the Quality Improvement  and Operations Management groups, have designed a quality  framework including reporting, communications and service  specifications for the integrated community services model.    An alliance agreement between the DHB and the three providers  has been in place since 1 July, with providers formally joining the  CCN District Alliance Agreement and a specific Community Services  Service Level Agreement.  As part of this approach, ongoing  development of the service is expected through the CSSLA. 

2.8  Ensure the progressive rollout of access to  InterRAI to Canterbury clinicians. 

InterRAI training provided to Home Based  Support Service providers. 

Q1 



2.9  Ensure access to InterRAI reports is available  to key stakeholders within the health system.  For  example primary care, community care providers and  aged residential care.  Provide evidence that nominated  groups have read‐only access and information/training  has occurred on interpretation of reports as required.   

Two ARC InterRAI information sessions  organised in 2012/13. 

Q4 

 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

The training has been completed for the majority of the Home  Based Support Services staff, and the three providers are using the  Contact Assessment with service users with non‐complex needs.  Further training for new Community Services staff will be provided  on an ‘as needed’ basis.  Currently 15 Canterbury ARC facilities are using InterRAI.  CDHB OPH community teams are using InterRAI. 

More Canterbury ARC facilities use InterRAI –  base 11 facilities. 



Q4 

 

At present, GPs can request ‘’read only’ access via CDHB’s InterRAI.  

10 

2.10   Optimise the availability of equipment to  CREST patients through the revision of the CREST  equipment pathway; the implementation of an  appropriate system for equipment sourcing, retrieval  and storage. 

2.11   Advance Care Planning improved and  recorded in the same way consistently across  Canterbury. 

Equipment sourcing, storage and retrieval  processes in place. 

Q3 

CREST equipment pathway revised to reflect  improved processes. 

Q3 

 

Regular meetings between CREST OTs and  Planning and Funding established to make  ongoing quality improvements. 

Q3 

 

Agree on strategy and training requirements. 

Q2 

 

  The CREST equipment pathway has been updated, and regular  meetings are being held between Planning and Funding and the  CREST team to ensure the system works and to discuss future CREST  service rollouts and the equipment needed to make this happen. 

The South Island Health of Older People SLA is planning a one‐day  regional service development Advanced Care Planning workshop in  Christchurch on 30 October 2012. 

   

 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

 

11 

KEY MEASURES: Age‐adjusted rates of acute hospital admissions and residential care admissions for elderly  Acute Admission Rate Per 1,000

2008/09

2009/10

2010/11

2011/12

63.7 63.6

62.2

60

2009/10

2010/11

Qtr‐4

Qtr‐3

Qtr‐2

Qtr‐1

Qtr‐4

Qtr‐3

Qtr‐2

55

2008/09

  Data relating to Q4 2011/12 aged residential care (ARC) are not yet stable, as not all claims for the  period had been paid at the time this report was compiled.  The current value is included;  however, it will change as claims are processed.  The graph above shows that ARC admissions have  been reducing since 2010/11. 

63.3

62.2

Qtr‐1

Qtr‐4

Qtr‐3

Qtr‐2

Qtr‐1

Qtr‐4

Qtr‐3

Qtr‐2

Qtr‐1

Qtr‐4

Qtr‐3

Qtr‐2

Qtr‐1

Qtr‐4

Qtr‐3

Qtr‐2

0

62.3

Qtr‐4

1

60.6

64.9

Qtr‐3

2

65

71.4 67.2 67.3

66.2 66.9

65.5

Qtr‐2

4.5 4.3 4.6 4.1 4.4 4.1

67.2

Qtr‐1

3

4.9

4.9 4.7 4.8

4.5

70

Qtr‐4

5.1 4.9

4

6.3

5.8

Qtr‐3

6.2

70.9

Qtr‐2

5

75

Qtr‐1

6

Acute Admissions Per 1,000

7

Qtr‐1

ARC Admissions Per 1,000

ARC Admission Rate Per 1,000

2011/12

  The graph above relating to acute admission of people >65 years old shows the seasonal  nature of acute admissions and that the number of admissions in the >65 age group was  increasing, but has dropped off compared to corresponding periods in previous years.  This  data reflects both patients admitted acutely via ED and patients admitted acutely through  direct referral by their GPs (this option has been available since May 2011). 

Canterbury's Age Standardised Discharge Ratio for Acute Admissions 65+ 1.2 Discharge Rate

Both the Urgent Care and Aged Care work  programmes are working to reduce the rate of ED  presentations.  Further understanding is provided by  considering the aged standardised discharge ratio for  patients aged 65+ (graphed to the right).  This measure  compares the rate of admissions for this group of  people with the rate across the rest of New Zealand  and shows that Canterbury has a consistently lower  rate of admission than the national rate. This reflects  the effectiveness of the Canterbury health system in  reducing the number of acute admissions in this age  group by several hundred per month.   

1.0 0.8 0.6

0.83

0.80

0.81

0.82

0.83

0.81

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

0.89

0.87

0.87

Q2

Q3

0.79

0.76

0.80

0.80

0.77

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

0.87

0.4 0.2 0.0 2008/09

Q1

2009/10

2010/11

Canterbury Standardised Ratio

2011/12

Q1 2012/13

National Admission Rate  

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

 

12 



Children and youth health  Action 

Target 

3.1  Establish the CCN Child and Youth Health  Workstream and develop two key 2012/13 work  programmes. 

Child and Youth work programmes established. 

By 

Status 



Q1 

Current Achievement/Progress  The Child and Youth workstream held its inaugural meeting in May  2012 and has subgroups working in child health and youth health  respectively.  The workstream’s work plan spans eight key themes:  Access, Navigation, Communication, Interagency Collaboration,  Vulnerable Children/Youth, Transition, Workforce and Other.  The  initial ideas generation phase resulted in the development of more  than 50 areas to explore.  In September, the CCN Alliance  Leadership Team endorsed the work plan, noting that some  conversations are yet to occur over the resources required to  implement the plan.  The ALT noted the impressive breadth of  engagement that has occurred in order to generate the two work  plans, which identify actions for the coming two years.   Child: ‘Make it Better’ Improve health collaboration with schools;  Improved communication with whānau/families; Improved  communication with stakeholders; Child Navigators; Services that  focus on vulnerable children; Provide direction for Child Health work  programmes; and ‘CaSE’ Care System Education.  Youth: Ensure each young person has a ‘Health Home’; Improve  health literacy among youth; Improved communication with  stakeholders; Right point of entry; Enhancing the system of care for  youth; Youth voice representation; and ‘CaSE’ Care System  Education. 

3.2  Enhance collaboration around protection,  prevention and early intervention strategies:  Identify initiatives to reduce smoking in pregnancy as  part of the development of a wider strategy for reducing  Sudden Unexplained Death in Infants (SUDI).   3.3  Support the implementation of zero‐fee after  hours GP visits for children under six. 

Progress towards 90% of women who identify  as smokers at the time of confirmation of  pregnancy being offered advice and support to  quit. 

75% of the population under six have access to  free afterhours care. 

 

Q4 



Q4 

The Ministry of Health collect this data directly from lead maternity  carers (LMCs).  Information from the Ministry of Health is not  available at this time.  85% of Canterbury’s population under the age of six has access to  free afterhours care on the basis of an interim arrangement that has  been put in place with afterhours providers.  A long‐term solution is being developed. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

 

13 

We are very close to activating our electronic notification to Well  Child/Tamarki Ora providers when the baby leaves the birthing  facility.   3.4  Support children being enrolled at birth with  general practice, WellChild/Tamariki Ora and oral health  providers. 

90% of all new babies will have an identified  WellChild/Tamariki Ora provider or GP by 2  weeks of age. 

 

Q4 

We have reviewed data for each quarter last year and can see that  we reached the required targets.  Last year 94% of babies had an  identified WellChild/Tamariki ora provider when they left the  birthing facility. (This excludes a small number of babies where a  provider is not required, e.g. moving overseas, deceased)    (See also 17.3 below.) 

3.5  Support the B4 School Check (B4SC) Clinical  Advisory Group to closely monitor access to Checks,  referral patterns, and the growth and development of  the service. 

80% of children in deprivation Quintile 5  receive a B4SC. 

Identify population patterns and track the movement of  high‐need families around Canterbury. 

 

Q4 

3.7  Involve Well Child/Tamariki Ora providers and  general practice in identifying children most at risk of  tooth decay and support their families to maintain good  oral health and access preventive care. 

3.8   Investigate and implement alternatives to the  current solely private practice‐based service model for  adolescents to engage more young people in the service  – particularly those at low decile schools. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

PHOs are reviewing delivery models to ensure that there are no  barriers to access.   

80% of children in Quintiles 0‐4 receive a B4SC. 

Q4 

 

Gateway Assessment processes established  and running. 

Q1 



This service is established and managing coordination of  assessments and processes involved.  

100% of children referred by CYF are receiving  Gateway Assessments. 

Q2 

 

By the end of the quarter, 100% of children referred by Child, Youth  and Family (CYF) in Quarter 1 had either commenced or completed  their Gateway Assessment.  

>66% of 0‐4 year olds are enrolled in DHB‐ funded oral healthcare services. 

Q3 

 

>90% of children enrolled in school and  community dental services are examined  according to planned recall.  

Q3 

 

>65% of five year olds are caries free (no holes  or fillings). 

Q3 

 

>75% of all eligible adolescents use DHB‐ funded dental care. 

Q4 

 

Use PHO mobile engagement teams to improve B4SC  uptake amongst Māori, Pacific and Quintile 5 children.  3.6   Develop a service for vulnerable children and  young people that incorporates Gateway Assessments  and other aligned and complementary services. 

In Quarter 1, 65% of Quintile 5 and 72%% of Quintile 0‐4 children  had completed B4SC. 

 

The new B4SC nurse coordinator is reviewing education for  providers. 

Oral health data is reported annually in Quarter 3. 

Adolescent use of DHB‐funded dental care is reported annually in  Quarter 4. 

14 



Primary and secondary integration  Action 

Target 

4.1   Continue to link clinicians across the health  system to build trust and ways of working together that  maximise patient outcomes.  Expand the range of  clinical pathways between primary and secondary care  to ensure patients receive the right care at the right  time from the right provider, support the reduction in  waiting times and maximise the value provided by  clinicians right across the health sector. 



470 HealthPathways available across the  Canterbury system. 

By 

Status 

 

Q4 

Current Achievement/Progress  A total of 422 pathways, 66 referral pages and 42 resources are live.   This includes 41 pathways, 11 referral pages and 4 resources which  are being reviewed.  Reviews are occurring in child health,  gastroenterology, gynaecology and respiratory.  80 patient information pages are in place.   

Ongoing active review of current  HealthPathways. 

Qly 



By 

Status 

51 pathways, 6 referral pages and 3 referral pages are in draft  currently.  These are in infectious diseases, genetics and acute  orthopaedics. 

Urban integrated family health and social service networks  Action 

Target 

5.1  Develop and support the implementation of  eight Integrated Family Health Centres (IFHCs) and  networks within Christchurch. 

6 urban IFHC/networks under development. 

 

Q4 

Current Achievement/Progress  Seven groups have business cases concluding currently.  These are  being provided to the groups for their consideration.  A further  three groups have business cases under development at the  moment.  These ten groups currently provide general practice  services to over 83,000 people.  A further nine groups are actively considering joining the process. 

5.2  Support the development of two Community  Hubs across Canterbury to provide a range of outpatient  and community specialist activity alongside extended  primary care. 

Identified community hubs are scoped. 

 

Q4 

Clinicians and managers from across the health system are actively  involved in working to consider the range of services that should be  provided in hubs.  Architects, clinicians and managers will be  brought together for a design workshop in the second quarter.  

   

 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

 

15 



Rural health workstream  Action 

Target  Advice is developed for Integrated Family  Health Services within the Ashburton TLA.   Framework recommendations will be provided  by March 2012 and further developed during  2012/13 financial year.  Rural Workstream meetings continue  throughout the 2012 calendar year at  approximately 6 weekly intervals. 

6.1  The Rural Health Workstream will develop  integrated family health services including the  development of IFHCs in rural Canterbury. 

   

 

Status 

Q3  &  Q4 

Qly 

Current Achievement/Progress 

 

Sound progress has been made towards an IFHC in Ashburton.   Population and demand analyses have been provided for all  practices and their populations in the Ashburton TLA, along with  further financial and business analysis.  The draft of the second  stage business case has been completed.  Facility requirements are  under consideration. 

 

Rural Workstream meetings have been held monthly.  The workplan  has been constructed with seven sub‐workstreams (workforce, IT,  rural hospitals and IFHC, older persons, nursing in the community,  mental health and allied health services), which are underway.  

Rural Workstream networks with other SLAs  and workstreams are developed ensuring  sound communication channels. 

Q4 

 

The Rural Workstream is engaging with other work areas and  integrating activity across the system.  Presentations have been  made by other SLAs and workstreams to create an awareness of  relevant activities and to facilitate communication channels. 

Construction of Darfield IFHC underway. 

Q1 



Construction of the Darfield IFHC will begin on 15 October 2012 and  will be completed during 2013. 

Construction of Kaikoura IFHC completed. 

Q4 

 

A business case for the Kaikoura build has been submitted to the  Capital Investment Committee. 



Underway. CDHB, community and RCPHO are working together to  design a health hub/IFHC with shared facilities (office space, kitchen,  laundry, etc.), some respite /palliative care beds and the integration  of the present Pompallier House (up to level 3 rest home care) and a  pharmacy on a central level site in Akaroa. Funding options are not  clear at this stage. Identification of gaps and development of a  model of care for the Akaroa / Little River area continue.  

Business Case for Akaroa IFHC underway. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report 

By 

Q2 

 

16 

6.2    Undertake the scoping of the northern  corridor to understand utilisation and determine a  framework that supports appropriate models of care for  this population. 



Integrated Family Health Services advised on  for the Northern Corridor. Framework  recommendations will be provided by June  2012 and further developed during 2012/13  financial year. 

Qly 

 

Target 

By 

Status 

The North Canterbury Health Hub will be located in Rangiora.  Project management consultants have been contracted to fast‐track  progress on the hub’s design along with the design of the Central  City Hub. The Rangiora Hub will be accessible 24 hours a day, seven  days a week as part of a network of integrated services. In addition  to acute care backed by telemedicine, it will provide a primary  birthing facility, postnatal care, convalescent care, observation beds  for acute patients, a St John Ambulance base, outpatient clinics,  diagnostics, community mental health services and opportunities for  other health‐related community services. 

Long‐term conditions  Action 

Current Achievement/Progress 

Respiratory disease  The earthquakes have made the primary care ABC implementation  challenging, with our population still focused on urgent needs like  home repairs rather than making healthy lifestyle changes.  

90% of enrolled smokers seen in general  practice are provided with advice and help to  quit. 

7.1     Support the implementation of ABC in  primary care with systems to provide and record the  provision of smoking cessation advice. 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     



Q4 

Nonetheless, our results continue to improve. Canterbury general  practices have reported giving 12,635 smokers brief advice and help  to quit in the year to 30 June 2012.  This is an increase of 2,166 over  the 3 months since the last quarter and represents 25% of current  smokers expected to be seen in general practice in that period.  Primary care’s efforts to date have focused on recording patient  smoking status, and this has paid off: all PHOs have now recorded  the smoking status of at least 70% of their eligible population.   As the focus shifts into providing quit advice and support, we expect  to see an increased rate of improvement in performance over  2012/13.  The Canterbury DHB has procured Txt2Remind for all  practices to use for ABC and other activities. 

 

>200 people enrol with the Aukati Kaipaipa  smoking cessation programme. 

Q4 

 

This data is collected on a six‐monthly basis and will be included in  the next report. 

>7,000 Canterbury residents seek additional  cessation support from ‘Quitline’ services. 

Q4 

 

This data is collected annually and will be included in the Q4 report. 

 

17 

4 large group ABC training sessions are  delivered in primary care. 

Q4 



The planning in this area has been amended.  One large group round  will be provided (planned for March 2012) and ABC training and  programme updates will be delivered to general practice teams by  Practice Support Liaison staff and at small group meetings. 

60% of community pharmacy staff complete  ABC e‐learning. 

Q4 



69 Pharmacies (out of 109, i.e. 63%) have notified Canterbury  Clinical Pharmacy Group that they have staff who have completed  the training. 

Stage I model focused on identifying people at  risk of readmission validated. 

Q1 



Stage II model focused on first admission  developed. 

Q2 

 

7.3   Continue to develop a real‐time integrated  SFN data set and introduce related data sets, including  acute demand management, to inform and engage  clinical staff in new solutions to influence demand. 

Live weekly update of SFN data available. 

Q1 



Weekly updating of these data is in place. 

7.4  Consolidate and refine the case finding of  people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease  (COPD) and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). 

More people access spirometry tests in the  community (for COPD) – base 1,118. 

Q4 

 

In Quarter 1, Cantabrians received 403 spirometry tests and 217  sleep assessments in the community from general practice or  mobile community teams, without the need for a hospital visit. 

Collaborate with Māori health providers and deliver  improved access to diagnostics and tailored respiratory  programmes for Māori. 

More people access sleep assessments in the  community (for OSA) – base 690. 

Q4 

 

These represent substantial increases compared to the same  quarter last year (when 298 spirometry tests and 192 sleep  assessments were delivered in the community).  

7.2   Undertake predictive risk modelling to  identify people at risk of readmission. 

7.5   Enhance linkages with public health  programmes for warmer homes and smoking cessation  to support those at risk of respiratory disease.  

Equitable access to respiratory services across  urban and rural communities. 

 

Q4 

Support seamless patient care and improved access to  respiratory services for patients in rural communities.  Explore the Continuous Positive Airways Pressure  (CPAP) model of care that promotes and supports an  annual patient review in the community. 

Primary and secondary care access to nursing  services in a collaborative approach with  general practice. 



Q4 

   

 

Community respiratory Nurses (CRNs) are supporting general  practices across Canterbury with management of COPD patients and  providing training and support.  CRNs are also supporting and  working with Acute Demand Nurses with support for respiratory  patients.  A single point of entry has been established for pulmonary  rehabilitation. The community respiratory physician is available to  general practice for advice, support and education.  The community respiratory physiotherapy model is currently being 

Work towards an integrated, multidisciplinary approach 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report 

The initial risk prediction model has been completed and validated  against previous data.  This is now being adapted for systematic use  against the Canterbury data warehouse.  A number of modifications  to the model have been explored to seek improved performance.   The systemic production of a ‘live’ list of patients at high risk of  readmission will be produced within the next month.  This will  initially be piloted in two practices before wider dissemination. 

 

18 

to the management of acute and sub‐acute COPD at  multiple points of intervention through the system  including: primary care, acute demand, ambulance, ED  and hospital discharge. 

Establish multidisciplinary home‐based care for  lung disease.  

Q4 

 

Q4 



Q4 

 

Continue to support community‐based respiratory  nurses and Allied Health professionals across the system  to reduce hospital admissions. 

100% of ‘frequently admitted’ respiratory  Continue to invest in enhancing skills and competence in  patients enrolled in CCMS.   managing respiratory conditions.  Expand Collaborative Care Management System (CCMS)  capability to facilitate coordination between primary  and secondary care providers for complex patients with  long‐term conditions.  Focus on cardiology and respiratory patients who are  frequent attendees at ED and hospital. 

7.6   Support continued investment in  rehabilitation programmes to reduce the likelihood of  an exacerbation or readmission and to support people  to improve the quality of their lives. 

10% reduction in COPD admissions and  readmissions  

More people access pulmonary rehabilitation  programmes in the community – base 108. 

 

Q4 

developed and will include a community cystic fibrosis  physiotherapist.  214 patients with COPD who called an ambulance have been  managed in primary care since 1 July 2012. This is 33% of ambulance  calls for such conditions. 

Pulmonary rehabilitation programmes are being delivered in the  rural (Amberley/Cheviot/Rangiora/Ashburton) areas as well as  within urban settings.  During 2011/12 6 programmes had 83 attendees.  During the first  quarter of 2012/13, one course was run with 16 attendees.  Marketing of Pulmonary Rehabilitation programmes is in place to  increase the number of referrals. 

Diabetes  7.7   The Integrated Diabetes Service (IDS)  Development and Operational groups and the Diabetes  Consumer Group will develop an integrated approach  for people with diabetes in Canterbury that is ‘best for  patient, best for system’. 

Target ‘high needs’ group defined. 

Q1 



New Diabetes Care Improvement Package  agreed. 

Q1 



Q2 

 

Implement a Diabetes Care Improvement Package which  Strategy for newly diagnosed in place.  enhances the provision of diabetes care across the 

Better, Sooner, More Convenient Progress Report     

 

 

The clinical governance group chairs and consumers defined ‘high  needs’ patients for diabetes as part of the minimum standards of  care developed for the Diabetes care improvement package  Key stakeholders have developed Diabetes Care Improvement  Package principles outlining minimum standards of care and  outcomes. The package has been agreed, and we are currently  working out the final contracting. 

19 

enrolled population with a particular emphasis on high‐ risk / high‐needs groups. 

84 people were newly diagnosed with Type 2 during Quarter 1 and  received self management support from the GP team under  Canterbury’s diabetes subsidy for general practice. This compares  with 101 for the same quarter last year. 

More people with diabetes (identified by  general practice) are supported to manage  their diabetes. 

 

Q4 

Another 78 people received support in learning how to use insulin  under Canterbury’s other diabetes subsidy. This compares with 45  for the same quarter last year.  General practice has been encouraged to code patients with  diabetes as part of the care improvement package. All patients are  to be coded by March 2013.  The Integrated Diabetes Service Development Group is working with  consumers to support self management of diabetes. Conversations  maps are being piloted across the region. Allied health is working to  align education and training for consumers. 

7.8   Continue to invest in programmes that  support lifestyle and behavioural modification to  support people most at risk of Diabetes and CVD. 

90 Appetite for Life courses delivered in the  community. 

Q4 



7.9   Continue to invest in programmes to manage  people newly diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and  people with diabetes who are first starting insulin  treatment. 

More people newly diagnosed with Type 2  diabetes access support in the community –  base 163. 

Q4 

 

Design and implement clinical/patient education and  tools for improving and supporting self management of  diabetes.   Provide support and training to general practice teams  to enable them to provide good quality diabetes care in  their local communities. 

79% of the proportion of the population  identified with diabetes have HbA1c 

Suggest Documents