JB Accepts, published online ahead of print on 30 November 2012 J. Bacteriol. doi:10.1128/JB.01743-12 Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
1 2
ClpL is required for folding of CtsR in Streptococcus mutans
3
Liang Tao and Indranil Biswas* Department of Microbiology, Molecular Genetics and Immunology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160 Running Title: ClpL acts as a chaperone *Corresponding author. Mailing address: 2032 BERI, 3901 Rainbow Blvd. MSC 3029. Kansas City, KS 66160. Phone: (913) 588-7019 Fax: (913) 588-7295 E-mail:
[email protected]
16
1
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
SUMMARY
18
ClpL, a member of HSP100 family, is widely distributed in gram-positive bacteria but is
19
absent in gram-negative bacteria. Although ClpL is involved in various cellular
20
processes such as stress tolerance response, long-term survival, virulence, and
21
antibiotic resistance; the detailed molecular mechanisms are largely unclear. Here
22
we report that ClpL acts as a chaperone to properly fold CtsR, a stress-response
23
repressor, and prevents it from forming protein aggregates in Streptococcus mutans.
24
In vitro, ClpL was able to successfully refold urea-denatured CtsR but not aggregated
25
proteins. We suggest that ClpL primarily recognize soluble but denatured substrates
26
and prevent formation of large protein aggregates.
27
C-terminal D2-small domain of ClpL is essential for the observed chaperone activity.
28
Since ClpL widely contributes to various cellular functions, we speculate that ClpL
29
chaperone activity is necessary to maintain the cellular homeostasis.
We also found that in vivo
30
2
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
17
Introduction
32
Bacteria are constantly exposed to stressful environments such as exposure to free
33
radicals, acidic or alkaline conditions, or high temperature. Exposure to environmental
34
stresses often causes denaturation of cellular proteins that subsequently accumulate
35
within the cell as protein aggregates. To encounter the detrimental effect of thermal
36
and other stresses, bacteria transiently synthesize a highly conserved set of proteins
37
with molecular chaperone or protease activities and are generally referred to as heat
38
shock proteins (HSPs) [1,2]. HSPs are ubiquitous in bacteria and depending on the
39
molecular weight HSPs are grouped into four major classes: HSP100, HSP70, HSP60,
40
and small HSP families [1,3]. HSP100 subgroup, which is also known as caseinolytic
41
protease system (Clp), is typically an AAA+ (ATPases associated with a variety of
42
cellular activities) super-family protein that often forms complexes with a peptidase
43
subunit, such as ClpP, for proteolytic activity required for removing damaged and
44
denatured proteins, as well as protein folding functions [4,5]. Clp proteases also play
45
important roles in regulating various cellular functions such as controlling growth at low
46
or high temperature, competence development, sporulation, and virulence [6,7,8,9].
47
According to the number of ATP-binding domains on the polypeptide chain,
48
regulatory ATPases subunits can be grouped into class-I (two ATP-binding domains,
49
AAA-1 and AAA-2) and class-II (one ATP-binding domain, AAA-1) [10]. Clp proteins
50
have also been categorized into various classes based on the length of the spacer
51
sequence at the middle region, overall sequence similarity, and variation in the N- and
52
C-terminal regions [10]. Clp ATPases that interact with ClpP peptidase, such as ClpA
3
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
31
53
and ClpX, encode a conserved IGF motif that is present at a surface loop [11,12].
54
These ATPase are assembled into hexameric rings with a narrow pore in the center
55
and use energy generated by the ATP hydrolysis to unfold target protein substrates
56
and translocate them into the chamber of associated barrel-like ClpP protease
57
complex, where the peptide bonds are cleaved [13,14,15,16]. There are a few Clp ATPases that do not interact with ClpP peptidase; instead they
59
sometimes cooperate with the HSP70 system to function as a chaperone that can
60
disaggregate and refold denatured proteins [17]. In Escherichia coli, ClpB is one such
61
Clp ATPase that does not interact with ClpP. ClpB contains two ATP-binding domains
62
(AAA-1 and AAA-2) that are separated by a middle domain (M-domain) forming a
63
coiled-coil structure [18,19]. Like other Clp ATPases, ClpB also forms a hexameric-ring
64
structure and cooperates with DnaK chaperone system that includes DnaK, DnaJ, and
65
GrpE [17,19]. ClpB has a remarkable ability to rescue proteins from an aggregated
66
state by aiding the disaggregation of denatured proteins. The complete refolding of the
67
denatured proteins is dependent on the concerted effort of the cognate
68
DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE system [20,21,22]. ClpB alone may also suppress the aggregation
69
of labile proteins with its monomeric or dimeric form [23]. Despite a wealth of
70
biochemical and structural information, the mechanistic aspects of this bi-chaperone
71
system remain poorly understood. This is in part because ClpB and DnaK system
72
interact only transiently [24,25] and recognize substrate proteins via sequential binding
73
[26]. Recently, it was suggested that ClpB M-domain determines the specificity
74
between ClpB and DnaK cooperation, which is required for protein disaggregation and
4
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
58
75
thermo tolerance [27,28]. In many low-GC gram-positive bacteria, in addition to ClpB, another protein, ClpL,
77
with homology to ClpB is also present [6,29]. In Streptococcus pneumoniae, a
78
respiratory pathogen, ClpL has been shown to be involved in thermo tolerance, acid
79
tolerance, and virulence regulation, and resistance to various antibiotics that target the
80
cell-wall [29,30,31,32].
81
Streptococcus mutans, a primary etiological agent of dental caries, possesses five
82
proteins that belong to the Clp family including ClpB, ClpC, ClpE, ClpL, and ClpX [33].
83
CtsR, a major repressor for the Clp ATPases [34,35], mainly regulates the expression
84
of stress response genes by recognizing a tandemly repeated hepta-nucleotidic
85
sequence known as CtsR-box [35]. We recently demonstrated that CtsR, is
86
accumulated in higher amounts in cells that do not have a functional ClpL [36]. The
87
finding was interesting since in most gram-positive bacteria CtsR is degraded by
88
ClpCP [37]. In this study, we showed that in the absence of ClpL, CtsR protein is
89
accumulated largely in the S. mutans cells as inactive aggregated form. Direct
90
protein-protein interaction between ClpL and CtsR was confirmed both in vitro and in
91
vivo. We also observed that the presence of ClpL largely enhanced the refolding of
92
urea-denatured CtsR in vitro. In vivo complementation showed that ClpL lacking the
93
D2-Small domain was no longer functional to alleviate the CtsR aggregates. These
94
results indicate that ClpL is crucial for proper folding of CtsR protein in S. mutans even
95
at ambient growth temperature.
96
5
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
76
MATERIALS AND METHODS
98
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions
99
The S. mutans strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1.
100
Escherichia coli strains were routinely grown in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented
101
with (when necessary) 100 μg/ml ampicillin, and/or 50μg/ml kanamycin. S. mutans
102
isolates were normally grown at 37°C in Todd-Hewitt medium (BBL, BD)
103
supplemented with 0.2% yeast extract (THY medium). When necessary, 5 μg/ml
104
erythromycin and/or 400 μg/ml kanamycin was included in THY medium.
105 106
Protein extraction and western blot analysis
107
For S. mutans protein extraction, unless otherwise stated, overnight grown cultures
108
were inoculated in THY medium and grown to exponential phase (optical density at
109
600 nm [OD600] = 0.4). A 10 ml aliquot was harvested by centrifugation, resuspended
110
in 600 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and homogenized with a bead-beater
111
(MP Biomedicals, LLC). Cell lysate was centrifuged at 18000 g for 10 minutes and
112
~200 μl of supernatant was carefully transferred into a new tube and kept as the
113
soluble fraction. The remaining supernatant was removed and the cell debris (pellet)
114
together with silicon beads were washed three times with PBS and resuspended in
115
200 μl of PBS and stored as the insoluble fraction. Both soluble and insoluble
116
fractions were added with protein sample buffer, boiled for 5 minutes, and separated
117
by SDS-PAGE. The gels were stained by Coomassie blue R-250 or blotted onto
118
PVDF membranes. Western blot assays were carried out using standard techniques.
6
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
97
An anti-polyhistidine (anti-His) monoclonal antibody (Sigma) was used as primary
120
antibody to detect his-tagged proteins. For western blot experiments using the cell
121
lysate as samples, the abundance of cellular enolase was chosen as an internal
122
control. PVDF membranes were stripped with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing
123
2% SDS and 100 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and reprobed by an anti-S. mutans enolase
124
(anti-SmuEno) polyclonal (Genscript) antibody. Western blots were developed with
125
Pierce ECL plus reagents (Thermo Scientific); and the fluorescent signals were
126
detected by Typhoon FLA9000 biomolecular imager (GE Healthcare).
127
blot experiments were repeated as least twice to confirm the results.
All western
128 129
Construction of PclpP-gusA reporter strain and β-glucuronidase (Gus) assay
130
Plasmid pIB521 containing PclpP-gusA fusion was previously used to measure clpP
131
promoter activity [38]. Plasmid pIB521 was linearized with BglI, transferred to S.
132
mutans IBSJ3 via natural transformation, using a protocol described previously [39] to
133
generate strain IBSJ9.
134
Briefly, the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of exponential phase culture was
135
recorded before cell harvesting. One ml of culture was harvested, washed in saline,
136
and resuspended in 500 μl of Z-buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM Na2HPO4, 10 mM
137
KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, and 20 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]). Cells were homogenized by bead
138
beating. 200μl of cell lysate was then transferred to a new tube, 100μl of
139
p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucoside (4 mg/ml in Z-buffer) was added, and incubated in 37°C
140
until a yellow color developed. The reaction was stopped by addition of 200 μl of 1 M
Gus assay was performed as previously described [36].
7
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
119
141
Na2CO3. The absorbance at 420 nm (A420) and the time period of the reaction in
142
minute (T) were noted. Gus activity was defined as [1000×A420]/[T ×OD600] in Miller
143
units (MU).
144
Co-expression of ClpL and CtsR in E. coli
146
The open reading frame (ORF) of ctsR was amplified from UA159 genomic with
147
primers
148
ctsR-duet-R (5’-CTTCTCGAGTCATAGATGGTATCCTTTTCTATC-3’); and restricted
149
with NdeI-XhoI. Similarly, the ORF of clpL was amplified from UA159 genomic with
150
primers clpL-duet-F (5’-CTTGGATCCGATGGCAAATTTTAATGGACGCG-3’) and
151
clpL-duet-R
152
restricted with BamHI-PstI. The restricted ctsR and clpL fragments were cloned into
153
vector pETduet, respectively, to create pIBJ33 and pIBJ34. The restricted ctsR
154
fragment was then cloned into NdeI-XhoI digested pIBJ34 to obtain pIBJ35. Plasmid
155
pIBJ35 was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) and allowed to co-express two
156
proteins under the inducement of Isopropyl-β-D-thio-galactoside (IPTG).
ctsR-duet-F
(5’-CTTCATATGACGTCAAAAAATACTTCAG-3’)
(5’-CTTCTGCAGTTAAGCTTCTTCAATAATCAATTTGTC-3’),
and
and
157 158
Protein purification and His-tag pull-down assay
159
His-CtsR expression was induced with 200 μg/L anhydrotetracycline in E. coli DH5α
160
with pIBC37. E. coli BL21 (DE3) with either pIBJ33 or pIBJ34 was used for the
161
over-expression of His-ClpL or CtsR-Stag induced by 1 mM IPTG. His-tagged proteins
162
were purified by nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) resin (Novagen) in accordance
8
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
145
with the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein was dialyzed overnight against a
164
buffer containing 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl and 1 mM DTT. Soluble
165
CtsR-Stag protein was extracted from purified inclusion bodies with PBS containing 8
166
M Urea. The protein extract was then dialyzed against PBS with Urea of gradient
167
concentrations and final protein solution contained 2 M urea. The purity of the
168
proteins was >95%, as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis. Protein concentrations
169
were
170
Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).
171
Pull-down assay for His-tagged proteins was performed using standard method.
172
Briefly, 50 μg of His-ClpL and/or 5 μg of CtsR-Stag were added to 1 ml of binding
173
buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 4 mM ATP; pH 7.6) together with 30
174
μl of pre-washed settled Ni-NTA resin. The mixture was incubated at 4 °C with rotation
175
for 30 minutes; resin was washed twice with PBS containing 30 mM of imidazole
176
followed by washing twice with PBS containing 0.01% Triton-X 100.
177
were eluted with elution buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM
178
imidazole; pH 7.4) and subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis.
estimated
by
the
absorbance
at
280
nm
using
Nanodrop
2000c
Bound proteins
179 180
Renaturation of S. mutans CtsR
181
CtsR-Stag dissolved in PBS containing 2 M urea was used for refolding assay by
182
dialysis at 4°C.
183
of CtsR-Stag before dialysis. To initiate renaturation, 400 μg/ml CtsR-Stag was
184
dialyzed at 4°C against a dialysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 50 mM
Urea (2 M) was pre-added to all additives to prevent the precipitation
9
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
163
NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 4 mM ATP in the presence or absence of His-ClpL of
186
varying concentrations. The dialyzed samples were centrifuged at 18000 g for 10 min,
187
and the supernatant fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The efficiency of
188
renaturation was determined by measuring the intensity of protein bands by
189
ImageQuantTL software on Coomassie blue stained gel. The EMSA assay used for
190
verifying the DNA binding activity of the refolded CtsR-Stag was performed as
191
previously described [36]. To test the potential for folding CtsR aggregates by ClpL,
192
insoluble CtsR-Stag aggregates were incubated with His-ClpL in the refolding buffer
193
(20 mM Tris-Cl, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 4 mM ATP; pH 7.4) for 4
194
hours at 37 °C. The mixture was then centrifuged at 18000 g for 10 minutes and the
195
supernatant fraction was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF
196
membrane. The detection of CtsR-Stag was performed by western blot using a
197
monoclonal anti-Stag antibody (Novagen).
198 199
Complementation of clpLΔN and clpLΔC
200
A DNA fragment encoding clpL ORF but lacking the 117 N-terminal amino residues
201
was amplified from UA159 genomic DNA using primers ClpLΔN-184km-F
202
(5’-CACGGATCCATGCCTGTTCTGGTCGGTGATG-3’)
203
(5’-CACGGTACCACAGCTTCTTCAATAATCAATTTGTC-3’).
204
fragment encoding clpL ORF but lacking the 78 C-terminal amino residues was also
205
amplified
206
(5’-CACGGATCCATGGCAAATTTTAATGGACGC-3’)
from
UA159
genomic
DNA
using
and
Similarly,
primers and
ClpL-184km-R a
DNA
ClpL-184km-F ClpLΔC-184km-R
10
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
185
(5’-CACGGTACCACGTGAGAGAATTCAATAACTGC-3’). The amplified fragments
208
were cloned into vector pIB184Km [40], which contains the P23 promoter, to create
209
pIBJ63 and pIBJ64, respectively. Strain IBSJ3/pIBJ1 was transformed with either
210
pIBJ63 or pIBJ64, and the transformants were selected on THY agar plates
211
containing both erythromycin and kanamycin. The presence of the complementary
212
genes and his-ctsR was confirmed on the selected transformants by PCR.
213 214
Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase Two-Hybrid (BACTH) assay
215
Two compatible plasmids, one expressing the T18 fusion (PUT18, Euromedex) and
216
the other expressing the T25 fusion (PKNT25, Euromedex), were chosen for our
217
BACTH assays. DNA fragments encoding full-length clpL, clpL lacking 117 N-terminal
218
amino acids (ClpLΔN), or clpL lacking 78 C-terminal amino acids (ClpLΔN) were
219
amplified from the UA159 genomic DNA and cloned into vector pUT18 to create
220
pIBJ58, pIBJ59 and pIBJ60, respectively. Meanwhile, the DNA fragments encoding
221
ctsR or clpL were amplified and cloned into vector pKNT25 to create pIBJ55 and
222
pIBJ62, respectively. Primers used for above gene amplifications are as follows:
223
ClpL-T18-F
224
(5’-CACGGTACCACAGCTTCTTCAATAATCAATTTGTC-3’),
ClpLΔN-T18-F
225
(5’-CACGGATCCACCTGTTCTGGTCGGTGATG-3’),
ClpLΔC-T18-R
226
(5’-CACGGTACCACGTGAGAGAATTCAATAACTGC-3’),
227
(5’-CACGGATCCAATGACGTCAAAAAATACTTCAG-3’),
228
(5’-CACGGTACCACTAGATGGTATCCTTTTCTATC-3’).
(5’-CACGGATCCAATGGCAAATTTTAATGGACGC-3’),
ClpL-T18-R
CtsR-T25-F and
CtsR-T25-R
11
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
207
Two compatible plasmids, a pUT18 derivative and a pKNT25 derivative, were
230
co-transformed into E. coli indicator strain BTH101 by electroporation and screened
231
on LB agar plates containing both ampicillin and kanamycin. The presence of the
232
target genes in the selected transformants was verified by PCR. The confirmed
233
bacterial cells were streaked onto the LB agar plates containing antibiotics, IPTG (0.5
234
mM), and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D- galactopyranoside (X-Gal, 40 μg/ml) and
235
grown at 30 °C. If there is an interaction between the two proteins of interest, the
236
colonies turn blue within 24-72 hours according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
237
Quantification of the functional complementation mediated by the interaction of two
238
proteins of interest was achieved by measuring β-galactosidase activity.
239 240
β-galactosidase assay
241
E. coli BTH101 cells with plasmids of interest were inoculated into liquid LB medium
242
containing ampicillin, kanamycin and IPTG (0.5 mM). The culture was grown
243
overnight at 37 °C to reach the stationary phase. The OD600 of the overnight culture
244
was recorded before harvesting. One milliliter of overnight culture was centrifuged;
245
cell pellets were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in the equal volume of
246
Z-buffer. 100 μl of resuspended bacterial cells were diluted in 1 ml of Z-buffer (dilution
247
factor [DF] =10). Afterwards, 100 μl of chloroform and 50 μl of 0.1% SDS were added
248
and mixed well to permeabilize the cells. 250 μl of mixture was then transferred to a
249
new
250
ο-nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (4 mg/ml in Z-buffer) was added, and incubated at 28°C
microfuge
tube
and
brought
to
28°C,
50
μl
of
pre-warmed
12
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
229
251
until a yellow color developed. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 200 μl of 1
252
M Na2CO3. The A420 and the precise time period of the reaction in minute (T) were
253
recorded. β-galactosidase activity was defined as [1000×A420×DF]/[T×OD600] in Miller
254
units (MU).
255
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
13
256
RESULTS
257
CtsR is accumulated in ΔclpL S. mutans strain as inactive aggregated form
258
Our previous study showed that CtsR protein was accumulated in large amount in a
259
clpL-deficient S. mutans strain [36].
260
accumulated CtsR (His-CtsR) is predominantly present in the pellet fraction and not in
261
the soluble fraction of the cell lysate from the ΔclpL strain (IBSJ3/pIBJ1). On the other
262
hand, very little His-CtsR protein was found in the insoluble fraction in the wild-type
263
background (i.e. UA159/pIBJ1; Fig. 1A).
264
specific to CtsR, we used HcrA, a transcriptional repressor also involved with heat
265
shock response, as control.
266
wild type and the mutant was similar, suggesting that ClpL is not involved with the
267
protein accumulation.
268
mutans cells and most of the protein was present as aggregated form, suggesting that
269
the accumulated form may be functionally inactive.
270
To determine whether the accumulation of CtsR in ΔclpL cells correlates with CtsR’s
271
ability to repress transcription, we used a reporter fusion strain that carry PclpP-gusA
272
construct in the chromosome.
273
binding and PclpP-gusA was successfully used to measure the CtsR repressor
274
activity [36,38]. Since CtsR is a repressor, low amounts of active CtsR would produce
275
increased Gus activity from this promoter fusion. PclpP-gusA fusion construct was
276
introduced into the wild type S. mutans strain UA159 and the ΔclpL mutant strain
277
IBSJ3 to create strains IBS514 and IBSJ9, respectively, and β-glucuronidase (GusA)
Further analyses suggested that the
As shown in Fig. 1B, the amount of HrcA protein in the
In contrast, CtsR was greatly accumulated in the ΔclpL S.
The clpP promoter is an authentic target for CtsR
14
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
To determine if the accumulation was
278
activity was measured from these reporter strains (Fig. 1C). Surprisingly, we observed
279
that the GusA activity was increased in IBSJ9 as compare with IBS514 even though
280
the amount of CtsR protein was much higher in the ΔclpL mutant strain (Fig. 1A).
281
These results suggest that although the CtsR protein has been accumulated in the
282
cell, in the absence of ClpL the accumulated CtsR remains as inactive form.
284
ClpL does not directly degrade CtsR in vitro
285
While aggregated proteins are usually highly refractory to various cellular proteases,
286
we wanted to investigate whether ClpL directly participates in the degradation of CtsR
287
protein or ClpL prevents misfolding of CtsR and thereby reducing the total
288
aggregation in the cells. Sequence analysis suggested that ClpL does not harbor any
289
peptidase-like domains and unlike other Clp ATPase proteins (such as ClpC or ClpX),
290
clpL does not encode IGF motif that is required for interaction with ClpP [11].
291
Therefore, it is unlikely that ClpL directly involved in the degradation of native CtsR to
292
control the protein level.
293
proteolytic potential of ClpL. Purified His-CtsR (100 ng/ml) was incubated with
294
His-ClpL (300 ng/ml) and whole cell lysate (500 μg/ml) from S. mutans UA159 in the
295
presence of 4 mM ATP at 37°C. The mixture was then separated by sodium dodecyl
296
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a
297
polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. Both His-CtsR and His-ClpL were
298
detected with anti-His antibody. No obvious degradation of His-CtsR was observed
299
after 30 minutes incubation (data not shown). Therefore, we speculate that ClpL
We designed an in vitro degradation assay to test the
15
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
283
300
controls the CtsR level in S. mutans by preventing the protein aggregation formation
301
rather than degradation of the natural form CtsR protein.
302
ClpL interacts with CtsR both in vitro and in vivo
304
If ClpL were to engage in the folding of CtsR protein, one would expect ClpL to
305
interact directly with CtsR.
306
and CtsR, we employed an in vitro pull-down assay with purified proteins to assess
307
the affinity between these two proteins.
308
C-terminal tagged CtsR (CtsR-Stag) were expressed separately and purified from E.
309
coli as bait and prey proteins.
310
exhibited a strong binding affinity to His-ClpL while it had no binding to empty Ni-NTA
311
resin (Fig. 2A).
312
The ClpL-CtsR interaction was also verified in vivo.
313
His-ClpL alone in E. coli cells. As expected, majority of the ClpL was in the soluble
314
fraction when induced at 37°C. On the other hand when CtsR-Stag alone was
315
expressed E.coli cells, the protein was always in the insoluble fraction even when the
316
cells were grown at a lower temperature. However, when both His-ClpL and
317
CtsR-Stag were co-expressed in E. coli, we found that nearly all His-ClpL protein
318
became insoluble (Fig. 2B). This data indicate that the ClpL-CtsR interaction also
319
exist in vivo. To further confirm the in vivo protein-protein interaction between ClpL
320
and CtsR, a bacterial two-hybrid (BACTH, Euromedex) system was employed to test
321
their binding affinity.
To explore the possibility of the interaction between ClpL
N-terminal tagged ClpL (His-ClpL) and
CtsR-Stag (dissolved in PBS containing 2 M urea)
For this, we first expressed
Bacterial colonies that co-expressed ClpL-T18 and CtsR-T25
16
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
303
322
fusion proteins became light blue, while the control bacterial colonies remained white
323
(Fig. 2C).
324
and is shown in Fig. 2D. These data suggest that ClpL interacts directly with CtsR,
325
however the interaction between fusion proteins appears to be not very strong since
326
the β-gal activity was low to moderate.
The interaction affinity was quantified using β-galactosidase (β-gal) assay
328
ClpL helps folding of CtsR in vitro
329
Since we determined the protein-protein interaction between ClpL and CtsR, we
330
speculated that ClpL might have a chaperone activity that helps folding of CtsR.
331
Note that, CtsR was hardly soluble when expressed in E. coli cells despite the
332
addition of an N-terminal or a C-terminal tag; and was mainly inactive when
333
accumulated in ΔclpL S. mutans strain. Urea was used to solubilize CtsR-Stag
334
aggregates and we examined the chaperone activity of ClpL. When CtsR-Stag was
335
dialyzed alone, soluble CtsR protein was hardly detected after urea removal (Fig. 3).
336
Addition of sheared salmon sperm DNA, which previously reported to help refolding of
337
HrcA [41], had little contribution on CtsR-Stag refolding (data not shown). However,
338
when twice the molar amount of His-ClpL was supplemented during the dialysis, the
339
refolding efficiency of CtsR-Stag was attained to approximately 80% (Fig. 3B).
340
refolded CtsR protein, which was devoid of urea, was active and retained its target
341
DNA binding activity (Fig. 3C).
342
the aggregate formation or can disaggregate once the protein aggregates are formed,
343
we incubated His-ClpL with CtsR-Stag aggregates in the presence of ATP and without
This
To test whether ClpL helps the folding of CtsR before
17
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
327
344
urea.
No soluble CtsR-Stag was detected in the supernatant fraction after 4 hours of
345
incubation, suggesting that ClpL alone was not sufficient to resolubilize the CtsR
346
aggregates (Fig. 3D).
347
well as in vivo and prevent accumulation of CtsR aggregates due to proper folding the
348
protein in the cell.
However, our data suggest that ClpL can fold CtsR in vitro as
350
Both N- and C- terminal domains contribute to oligomerization of ClpL
351
Primary sequence analysis showed that S. mutans ClpL contained two highly
352
conserved ATP-binding regions (AAA-1 and AAA-2 domain) and a D2-small domain at
353
its C-terminal domain. By comparison protein sequences of known Clp ATPases in S.
354
mutans, we found that the domain organization of ClpL is similar to ClpB, which is
355
widely present in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 4A). ClpB is
356
self-assembled to form an oligomeric complex; mainly as hexamer but also exist as
357
monomer and dimer [18,23]. When we applied the purified ClpL protein onto a
358
Superdex 200 10/300 GL size exclusion column, the elution profile yielded two equal
359
intensity peaks that correspond to molecular weights of >600 KDa and ~470 KDa
360
(data not shown). The latter size corresponds to a hexameric protein and the larger
361
size
362
(tris[2-carboxyethyl]phosphine, a reducing agent), greatly reduced the intensity of the
363
larger peak, but did not abolish it (data not shown).
364
ClpB also exists as hexamer, and perhaps other higher order oligomers.
365
the sequence similarity with ClpB and the presence of the C-terminal D2-small
indicates
protein
aggregates.
Treating
the
sample
with
TCEP
Thus, it appears that ClpL, like Because of
18
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
349
366
domain that forms a tight interface with the AAA2 domain of the neighboring subunit
367
of ClpB [18], we
368
domains of ClpL in oligomerization. Towards this end, truncated ClpL proteins with
369
either N- or C-terminal deleted regions were evaluated in BATCH assay for
370
interactions (Fig. 4B).
371
interacted strongly with ClpL-T25 fusion (Fig. 4C). We also observed that C-terminal
372
D2-small domain is essential for ClpL oligomerization, since deleting this domain in
373
ClpL-T18 (ClpLΔC-T18) resulted in the loss of interaction with ClpL-T25 (Fig. 4C).
374
However, deleting N-terminal 117 residues in ClpL-T18 (ClpLΔN-T18) also impaired
375
its interaction with ClpL-T25 (Fig. 4C). This is in contrast to ClpB protein where
376
deletion of N-terminal domain does not abolish the oligomerization as reported
377
previously [42]. Taken together, our data indicate that ClpL can form hexamer, and
378
both N- and C-terminal domains contribute to the protein oligomerization.
379
observed that deletion of N- or C-terminal domains of ClpL also weakens the
380
interaction with CtsR (Fig. 2C and D).
then wanted to explore the contribution of N- and C-terminal
As expected, the assay showed that ClpL-T18 fusion
381 382
C-terminal domain of ClpL is important for chaperone activity
383
To further understand the contribution of ClpL N-terminal and C-terminal domains to
384
its chaperone activity. We expressed either ClpLΔN or ClpLΔC in our ΔclpL mutant
385
strain IBSJ3/pIBJ1. Our previous study showed that His-CtsR accumulation was
386
prevented in IBSJ3/pIBJ1 when the full length ClpL was expressed in trans from a
387
plasmid [36].
We found that the expression of ClpLΔN in IBSJ3/pIBJ1 can also
19
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
We also
388
prevent the cellular accumulation of His-CtsR (Fig. 5). However, level of His-CtsR
389
accumulation was unchanged when ClpLΔC was expressed in IBSJ3/pIBJ1 (Fig. 5),
390
suggesting that deletion of C-terminal D2-small domain in ClpL resulted in the loss of
391
its chaperone activity. Thus, C-terminal D2 domain appears to play an important role
392
in protein folding.
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
393 394
20
DISCUSSION
396
ClpL is a unique member of the HSP100 family that does not encode the motif
397
required for interaction with ClpP. This protein is strictly found in gram-positive
398
bacteria including streptococci and is involved in various cellular processes such as
399
stress tolerance response, virulence, long-term cell survival, and antibiotic resistance
400
[7,30,31,32].
401
functions of this protein.
402
regulator, is accumulated in the clpL-deficient but not in the clpP-deficient strain [36].
403
Subsequently, we found that most of the accumulated protein was present in the
404
pellet fraction.
405
increased in the clpL-deficient strain, the accumulated CtsR protein seemed to be
406
improperly folded in the mutant strain.
407
pneumoniae ClpL can refold in the presence of ATP urea-denatured rhodanese (a
408
non-streptococcal protein) in a dose-dependent manner [29], indicating that ClpL
409
might have a chaperone activity.
410
involved in folding of CtsR in the cell.
411
showed that CtsR is a bona fide substrate for ClpL.
Despite its importance, very little is known about the molecular Our earlier study indicated that CtsR, a major heat shock
Since the expression from a CtsR-repressed promoter (PclpP) was
A previous study reported that S.
Therefore, we hypothesized that ClpL might be Our study presented here conclusively
412 413
In the wild type S. mutans cells, CtsR level is very low even after over expression of
414
CtsR from a multicopy plasmid indicating that the protein is readily degraded in the
415
cell. Our data showed that ClpL did not enhance the degradation of CtsR protein in its
416
native form; thus we suggest that the degradation step is correlated with protein
21
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
395
417
folding stage. This step may require involvement of other accessory proteins.
Since
418
ClpL does not contain any known peptidase domain, it seems other proteases are
419
involved in the substrate degradation. Previously it is reported that a large portion of
420
ClpL is membrane associated suggesting that ClpL may co-operate with
421
membrane-associated proteases (Tran et al., 2011).
422
S. mutans encodes two major membrane-associated stress related proteases, FtsH
423
and HtpX.
In E. coli and B. subtilis, FtsH is induced by heat- and osmotic shocks
424
([43]; [44]).
While FtsH is not essential for growth in species such as B. subtilis,
425
Corynebacterium glutamicum, and Lactobacillus plantarum [44,45]; [46]; FtsH is
426
essential is for some bacteria including E. coli and Lactococcus lactis ([47]; [48]).
427
Our repeated attempts to inactivate ftsH in S. mutans were unsuccessful, suggesting
428
that FtsH is also essential in this organism.
429
is a zinc-dependent mettaloprotease [49]) and is very poorly characterized.
430
we inactivated htpX in S. mutans we found that HtpX was not involved in the
431
degradation of CtsR (data not shown). Thus, additional bioinformatic and biochemical
432
analyses are required to identify the protease involved in CtsR degradation.
Genome analysis indicates that
When
433 434
It appears that CtsR is not the only substrate that is recognized by ClpL. Several
435
proteins, especially some high molecular weight proteins, were differentially
436
expressed in the clpL-deficient strain as compared to its parental strain (data not
437
shown).
438
increased susceptibility to penicillin-induced lysis in S. pneumoniae [31]. The reason
Recently, it has been demonstrated that a knockout mutant of clpL displays
22
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
The other stress-related protease, HtpX,
439
for this increased susceptibility is due to reduced PBP2x protein, which is required for
440
cell-wall biosynthesis. That study proposes that ClpL has two functions: “stabilize and
441
reactivate” PBP2x under stressful conditions and facilitate translocation of PBP2x to
442
the cell wall, by some unknown mechanism, which leads to wall thickening and
443
penicillin resistance [31].
444
since we observed increased bacitracin sensitivity in the clpL-deficient strain (data not
445
shown).
446
such as penicillin and cefixime have similar effect on the clpL mutant strain, which
447
displayed increased susceptibility towards these antibiotics.
ClpL probably plays a similar role in S. mutans as well
448 449
Although primary sequence analysis indicates that ClpL is analogous to ClpB protein,
450
a molecular chaperone that is present in both gram-negative and gram-positive
451
bacteria, some important differences also exist between these two proteins.
452
Compared to ClpL, ClpB possesses two additional domains, the N and M domain.
453
Despite the wealth of biochemical and structural data the exact functions of these
454
domains are not fully understood. The N domain of ClpB appears to be dispensable
455
for its oligomerization ability and in vivo chaperone activity [42,50], but it can increase
456
the interaction with protein aggregates [51,52]. On the other hand, the M domain,
457
consisting of four α helices, is very specific for ClpB function and forms a large
458
coiled-coil structure that protrudes from the ClpB hexameric ring [18]. The conserved
459
helix 3 of the M domain is particularly required for the DnaK-dependent shuffling of
460
aggregated proteins and not for soluble denatured substrates [53]. Mutations of this
23
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
Furthermore, we also found that several other cell wall damaging agents
domain result in a loss of DnaK/J-GrpE-dependent disaggregation activity while
462
retaining the DnaK/J-GrpE-independent functions of ClpB [42,53,54]. Since the M
463
domain is absent in ClpL protein, we speculate that ClpL does not cooperate with
464
DnaK system and therefore is not able to disaggregate preformed protein aggregates
465
and our observation that ClpL alone was not capable of resolubilizing preformed CtsR
466
aggregates is consistent with this notion.
467
interacts with the target substrates before the formation of protein aggregates and
468
helps to refold the substrates.
469
hexamer in solution [23,42,55].
470
domains are necessary for ClpL oligomerization as demonstrated by our bacterial
471
two-hybrid assays. Our data also indicated that the C-terminal D2-small domain is
472
essential in preventing CtsR aggregation in vivo.
Instead we speculate that ClpL primarily
Our data indicated that ClpL, like ClpB, is present as However, unlike in ClpB, both N- and C- terminal
473 474
In conclusion, we provide evidences that ClpL functions as a chaperone to fold CtsR
475
repressor, an important endogenous protein, and prevents the formation of
476
deleterious protein aggregates during ambient growth condition.
477
chaperone activity is not restricted to stress induced conditions.
478
ClpL plays a critical role in long-term survival [7] is because ClpL overall contributes to
479
the cellular homeostasis by preventing accumulation of protein aggregates. Our in
480
vitro assays suggest that other protein co-factors are not required for this folding
481
activity.
482
during in vivo folding and/or degradation process. Because ClpL plays an important
Therefore, the ClpL The reason that
However, we cannot rule out the possible involvement of other proteins
24
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
461
483
role in various cellular functions, detailed biochemical and structural characterizations
484
are necessary to understand the molecular mechanism of this novel chaperone.
485
This will further shed light on how gram-positive bacteria maintain the cellular
486
homeostasis and respond to various stresses.
487
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
488 489 490
25
491 492
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported in part by a NIDCR grant (DE021664) to IB.
493 494 495
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
26
496
1. Hendrick JP, Hartl FU (1993) Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 62: 349-384. 2. Craig EA, Gambill BD, Nelson RJ (1993) Heat shock proteins: molecular chaperones of protein biogenesis. Microbiol Rev 57: 402-414. 3. Lund PA (2001) Microbial molecular chaperones. Adv Microb Physiol 44: 93-140. 4. Gottesman S, Wickner S, Maurizi MR (1997) Protein quality control: triage by chaperones and proteases. Genes Dev 11: 815-823. 5. Zolkiewski M (2006) A camel passes through the eye of a needle: protein unfolding activity of Clp ATPases. Mol Microbiol 61: 1094-1100. 6. Frees D, Savijoki K, Varmanen P, Ingmer H (2007) Clp ATPases and ClpP proteolytic complexes regulate vital biological processes in low GC, Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 63: 1285-1295. 7. Kajfasz JK, Martinez AR, Rivera-Ramos I, Abranches J, Koo H, et al. (2009) Role of Clp proteins in expression of virulence properties of Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 191: 2060-2068. 8. Chastanet A, Prudhomme M, Claverys JP, Msadek T (2001) Regulation of Streptococcus pneumoniae clp genes and their role in competence development and stress survival. J Bacteriol 183: 7295-7307. 9. Capestany CA, Tribble GD, Maeda K, Demuth DR, Lamont RJ (2008) Role of the Clp system in stress tolerance, biofilm formation, and intracellular invasion in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol 190: 1436-1446. 10. Schirmer EC, Glover JR, Singer MA, Lindquist S (1996) HSP100/Clp proteins: a common mechanism explains diverse functions. Trends Biochem Sci 21: 289-296. 11. Kim YI, Levchenko I, Fraczkowska K, Woodruff RV, Sauer RT, et al. (2001) Molecular determinants of complex formation between Clp/Hsp100 ATPases and the ClpP peptidase. Nat Struct Biol 8: 230-233. 12. Martin A, Baker TA, Sauer RT (2007) Distinct static and dynamic interactions control ATPase-peptidase communication in a AAA+ protease. Mol Cell 27: 41-52. 13. Kirstein J, Moliere N, Dougan DA, Turgay K (2009) Adapting the machine: adaptor proteins for Hsp100/Clp and AAA+ proteases. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 589-599. 14. Nager AR, Baker TA, Sauer RT (2011) Stepwise Unfolding of a beta Barrel Protein by the AAA+ ClpXP Protease. J Mol Biol. 15. Siddiqui SM, Sauer RT, Baker TA (2004) Role of the processing pore of the ClpX AAA+ ATPase in the recognition and engagement of specific protein substrates. Genes Dev 18: 369-374. 16. Sauer RT, Baker TA (2011) AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu Rev Biochem 80: 587-612. 17. Glover JR, Lindquist S (1998) Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 94: 73-82. 18. Lee S, Sowa ME, Watanabe YH, Sigler PB, Chiu W, et al. (2003) The structure of clpB: A molecular chaperone that rescues proteins from an aggregated state. Cell 115: 229-240. 19. Weibezahn J, Tessarz P, Schlieker C, Zahn R, Maglica Z, et al. (2004) Thermotolerance requires refolding of aggregated proteins by substrate translocation through the central pore of ClpB.
27
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538
REFERENCES
Cell 119: 653-665. 20. Mogk A, Tomoyasu T, Goloubinoff P, Rudiger S, Roder D, et al. (1999) Identification of thermolabile Escherichia coli proteins: prevention and reversion of aggregation by DnaK and ClpB. EMBO J 18: 6934-6949. 21. Motohashi K, Watanabe Y, Yohda M, Yoshida M (1999) Heat-inactivated proteins are rescued by the DnaK.J-GrpE set and ClpB chaperones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 7184-7189. 22. Zolkiewski M (1999) ClpB cooperates with DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE in suppressing protein aggregation. A novel multi-chaperone system from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 274: 28083-28086. 23. Sugimoto S, Yoshida H, Mizunoe Y, Tsuruno K, Nakayama J, et al. (2006) Structural and functional conversion of molecular chaperone ClpB from the gram-positive halophilic lactic acid bacterium Tetragenococcus halophilus mediated by ATP and stress. J Bacteriol 188: 8070-8078. 24. Doyle SM, Hoskins JR, Wickner S (2007) Collaboration between the ClpB AAA+ remodeling protein and the DnaK chaperone system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 11138-11144. 25. Schlee S, Beinker P, Akhrymuk A, Reinstein J (2004) A chaperone network for the resolubilization of protein aggregates: direct interaction of ClpB and DnaK. J Mol Biol 336: 275-285. 26. Goloubinoff P, Mogk A, Zvi AP, Tomoyasu T, Bukau B (1999) Sequential mechanism of solubilization and refolding of stable protein aggregates by a bichaperone network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 13732-13737. 27. Miot M, Reidy M, Doyle SM, Hoskins JR, Johnston DM, et al. (2011) Species-specific collaboration of heat shock proteins (Hsp) 70 and 100 in thermotolerance and protein disaggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 6915-6920. 28. Sielaff B, Tsai FT (2010) The M-domain controls Hsp104 protein remodeling activity in an Hsp70/Hsp40-dependent manner. J Mol Biol 402: 30-37. 29. Kwon HY, Kim SW, Choi MH, Ogunniyi AD, Paton JC, et al. (2003) Effect of heat shock and mutations in ClpL and ClpP on virulence gene expression in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 71: 3757-3765. 30. Suokko A, Poutanen M, Savijoki K, Kalkkinen N, Varmanen P (2008) ClpL is essential for induction of thermotolerance and is potentially part of the HrcA regulon in Lactobacillus gasseri. Proteomics 8: 1029-1041. 31. Tran TD, Kwon HY, Kim EH, Kim KW, Briles DE, et al. (2011) Decrease in penicillin susceptibility due to heat shock protein ClpL in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 2714-2728. 32. Tu le N, Jeong HY, Kwon HY, Ogunniyi AD, Paton JC, et al. (2007) Modulation of adherence, invasion, and tumor necrosis factor alpha secretion during the early stages of infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae ClpL. Infect Immun 75: 2996-3005. 33. Ajdic D, McShan WM, McLaughlin RE, Savic G, Chang J, et al. (2002) Genome sequence of Streptococcus mutans UA159, a cariogenic dental pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 14434-14439. 34. Nair S, Derre I, Msadek T, Gaillot O, Berche P (2000) CtsR controls class III heat shock gene expression in the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol 35: 800-811. 35. Derre I, Rapoport G, Msadek T (1999) CtsR, a novel regulator of stress and heat shock response, controls clp and molecular chaperone gene expression in gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 31: 117-131.
28
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582
36. Tao L, Chattoraj P, Biswas I (2012) CtsR regulation in mcsAB-deficient Gram-positive bacteria. J Bacteriol 194: 1361-1368. 37. Kruger E, Zuhlke D, Witt E, Ludwig H, Hecker M (2001) Clp-mediated proteolysis in Gram-positive bacteria is autoregulated by the stability of a repressor. EMBO J 20: 852-863. 38. Zhang J, Banerjee A, Biswas I (2009) Transcription of clpP is enhanced by a unique tandem repeat sequence in Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 191: 1056-1065. 39. Biswas S, Biswas I (2006) Regulation of the glucosyltransferase (gtfBC) operon by CovR in Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 188: 988-998. 40. Biswas I, Jha JK, Fromm N (2008) Shuttle expression plasmids for genetic studies in Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology 154: 2275-2282. 41. Watanabe K, Yamamoto T, Suzuki Y (2001) Renaturation of Bacillus thermoglucosidasius HrcA repressor by DNA and thermostability of the HrcA-DNA complex in vitro. J Bacteriol 183: 155-161. 42. Mogk A, Schlieker C, Strub C, Rist W, Weibezahn J, et al. (2003) Roles of individual domains and conserved motifs of the AAA+ chaperone ClpB in oligomerization, ATP hydrolysis, and chaperone activity. J Biol Chem 278: 17615-17624. 43. Herman C, Thevenet D, D'Ari R, Bouloc P (1995) Degradation of sigma 32, the heat shock regulator in Escherichia coli, is governed by HflB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 3516-3520. 44. Deuerling E, Mogk A, Richter C, Purucker M, Schumann W (1997) The ftsH gene of Bacillus subtilis is involved in major cellular processes such as sporulation, stress adaptation and secretion. Mol Microbiol 23: 921-933. 45. Ludke A, Kramer R, Burkovski A, Schluesener D, Poetsch A (2007) A proteomic study of Corynebacterium glutamicum AAA+ protease FtsH. BMC Microbiol 7: 6. 46. Fiocco D, Collins M, Muscariello L, Hols P, Kleerebezem M, et al. (2009) The Lactobacillus plantarum ftsH gene is a novel member of the CtsR stress response regulon. J Bacteriol 191: 1688-1694. 47. Akiyama Y, Ogura T, Ito K (1994) Involvement of FtsH in protein assembly into and through the membrane. I. Mutations that reduce retention efficiency of a cytoplasmic reporter. J Biol Chem 269: 5218-5224. 48. Nilsson D, Lauridsen AA, Tomoyasu T, Ogura T (1994) A Lactococcus lactis gene encodes a membrane protein with putative ATPase activity that is homologous to the essential Escherichia coli ftsH gene product. Microbiology 140 ( Pt 10): 2601-2610. 49. Sakoh M, Ito K, Akiyama Y (2005) Proteolytic activity of HtpX, a membrane-bound and stress-controlled protease from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 280: 33305-33310. 50. Beinker P, Schlee S, Groemping Y, Seidel R, Reinstein J (2002) The N terminus of ClpB from Thermus thermophilus is not essential for the chaperone activity. J Biol Chem 277: 47160-47166. 51. Barnett ME, Nagy M, Kedzierska S, Zolkiewski M (2005) The amino-terminal domain of ClpB supports binding to strongly aggregated proteins. J Biol Chem 280: 34940-34945. 52. Chow IT, Barnett ME, Zolkiewski M, Baneyx F (2005) The N-terminal domain of Escherichia coli ClpB enhances chaperone function. FEBS Lett 579: 4242-4248. 53. Haslberger T, Weibezahn J, Zahn R, Lee S, Tsai FT, et al. (2007) M domains couple the ClpB threading motor with the DnaK chaperone activity. Mol Cell 25: 247-260. 54. Kedzierska S, Akoev V, Barnett ME, Zolkiewski M (2003) Structure and function of the middle
29
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626
627 628 629 630
domain of ClpB from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 42: 14242-14248. 55. Watanabe YH, Motohashi K, Yoshida M (2002) Roles of the two ATP binding sites of ClpB from Thermus thermophilus. J Biol Chem 277: 5804-5809.
631 632
Downloaded from http://jb.asm.org/ on June 7, 2018 by guest
30
Figure Legends
634
Fig. 1. His-CtsR is accumulated in ΔclpL but mainly as inactive form.
635
A. Western blot analysis of the cell lysates showing the amount of His-CtsR protein
636
in wild-type (UA159) and clpL-deficient strain (IBSJ3) in either soluble fraction (S)
637
or pellet fraction (P). The blot was probed with the anti-His antibody. The same
638
membrane was re-probed with the anti-SmuEno antibody to verify the amount of
639
endogenous enolase, which served as an internal loading control.
640
B. The protein amount of His-HrcA in wild-type and ΔclpL strain in either soluble
641
fraction (S) or pellet fraction (P) was also shown by western blot analysis. The
642
same membrane was also re-probed with the anti-SmuEno antibody.
643
C. Expression of PclpP-gusA fusion in ΔclpL (IBSJ9) compared with wild-type
644
(IBS514). GusA activity was assayed from the PclpP-gusA reporter construct to
645
measure the CtsR repressor activity. The values shown are MU of GusA activity.
646
(n=8 samples/group, p