CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement Attitudes of Young People Toward Diversity By Michael Olander,...
Author: Eustacia Lloyd
1 downloads 0 Views 208KB Size
FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

Attitudes of Young People Toward Diversity By Michael Olander, Research Assistant, Emily Hoban Kirby, Research Associate, and Krista Schmitt, Research Assistant1 February 2005

90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

White

African-American

Hispanic

Asian-American

2004

2002

2000

1998

1996

1994

1992

1990

1988

1986

1984

1982

1980

1978

1976

0% 1974

This trend is reflected in the electorate as well. According to the 2004 National Election Pool (NEP) exit polls, thirteen percent of young voters (ages 18-29) classified themselves as Hispanic/Latino, larger than the proportion in the electorate as a whole (8%). Fifteen percent of young voters selfidentified as Black, compared to 11% of all voters. Six percent identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, compared to 3% of the whole electorate. As the size of minority groups grows and increases in political strength, issues of acceptance among Americans are increasingly important to our polity.

Graph 1: Growing Racial and Ethnic Composition of Young People Ages 18-24, 1972 to 2004

1972

Over the past fifty years, the population of the United States has become progressively more diverse. This is especially true of young people. For example, since 1976 the percentage of Hispanic youth (age 18-24) has grown by ten points (see Graph 1).

Native American Source: Current Population Survey, November Supplements, 19722002, and March 2004 Current Population Annual Demographic File.

This fact sheet summarizes young people’s attitudes toward three groups that are sometimes targets of intolerance: gays, immigrants, and racial minorities. In general, the data show that young Americans are the most tolerant age group and are growing more tolerant over time. However, their social circles and voluntary associations (such as churches and other religious congregations) remain largely segregated by race.

School of Public Policy | 2101 Van Munching Hall | University of Maryland | College Park, MD 20742-1821 | P: 301 405 2790 | F: 301 314 9346 | W: www.civicyouth.org CIRCLE was founded in 2001 with a generous grant from The Pew Charitable Trusts and is now also funded by Carnegie Corporation of New York. CIRCLE based in the University of Maryland's School of Public Policy.

2

Attitudes towards Homosexuality by Age In 2004, a survey by the Council for Excellence in Government (CEG) and CIRCLE asked 15 to 25 year olds a series of questions regarding the rights of homosexuals. These questions ranged from whether gay and lesbian people were entitled to equal protection in housing to whether they needed protection against hate crimes. They also included statements about job discrimination and the right to adopt. When compared to National Election Study (NES) data from 2000 (see Graph 3), it appears that youth are much more likely to support equal protection for employment. The final two questions asked about a current political question – the legality of civil unions and marriage. As Graph 2 shows, a majority of youth support both civil unions and gay marriage, though civil unions find more support.2 The survey also found that youth attitudes towards extending equal protections to gays differ by race/ethnicity. African American and Latino youth are more supportive of laws that provide equal protections on housing, employment, and hate crimes than whites. And majorities of these young people support civil unions, marriage, and adoption. Moreover, youth support for equal protections for gays, seems to cross partisan, ideological, and religious lines. For example, majorities of Republican, conservative, and Born-Again Christian youth also support protections on housing, employment, and hate crimes, although they oppose gay civil unions, marriage, and adoption.

Graph 2: Young Americans' Support for Gay and Lesbian Issues equal protection in housing

86%

10%

equal protection in employment

85%

14%

protection from hate crimes

85%

13%

civic unions or legal partnerships

63%

30%

ability to legally marry

39%

ability to adopt children

39% 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

56% 53%

50%

Oppose

60%

70%

80%

Support

Source: National Youth Survey, 2004 C EG/C IRC LE

90%

100%

3

It appears that through the years, young people have become increasingly supportive of laws prohibiting discrimination. The NES began asking about attitudes towards laws prohibiting discrimination against homosexuals in 1988. At that time, 51 percent of youth (ages 18 to 25) felt there should be laws to protect gays from discrimination in the workforce. Only 12 years later, this figure had risen to 70 percent. While less dramatic, attitudes among those over 25 show a similar pattern (see Graph 3).

Graph 3: "Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination," by Age 80% 70%

70% 63%

60% 50%

Favor

51% 47%

40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1988

1992

Age 18 to 25

1996

2000

Age 26 and over

Source: Nat ional Elect ion St udy, 1988- 2000

Graph 4: Homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the US Armed Forces, by Age 90%

85%

80% 70% 60% 50%

69%

59% 56%

40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1992

Age 18 to 25

1996

2000

Age 26 and over

Source: National Election St udy, 1992-2000

Another question, whether gays should be allowed in the military, shows a similar trend over a short period of time. See Graph 4.

4

The Civic and Political Health of the Nation provides a more general view of attitudes toward homosexuals. It asked respondents to agree or disagree with the statement, “homosexuality is a way of life that should be accepted by society.” A majority of all age groups except those over 57 agreed with this idea. Youth were the most tolerant group, with 60 percent believing society should accept homosexuality. Graph 5 provides more data on this question. When youth know someone who is gay, they are more likely to support rights for all homosexuals. Graph 6 shows this divergence in attitudes on two dimensions, civil unions and marriage. Support for these rights is nearly two times more prominent among those who know at least one gay person. This survey found that 49 percent of youth knew a gay person while 47 percent did not. At least for this dimension of tolerance, it seems like exposure to difference encourages tolerance.

Graph 5: "Homosexuality is a way of life that should be accepted by society," by Age 70% 60%

60%

54% 50%

50%

49%

39%

40%

37%

39%

33%

30% 20% 10%

Graph 6: Youth Attitudes Toward Civil Unions and Gay Marriage 100% 80%

80%

60% 40%

41%

20% 0% C ivil Unions

agree 15-25

disagree 26-37

38-56

57+

So urce: CIRCLE/The Civic and P o litical Health o f the Natio n: A Generatio nal P o rtrait, Sep 2002

73%

45%

0%

Marriage

know a gay person does not know a gay person So urce: Natio nal Yo uth Survey, 2004 CEG/CIRCLE

5

Generally, surveys have shown that young people are more accepting of diversity than older people. These differences in attitudes seem to carry into the political arena. For example, the 2004 National Election Pool (NEP) exit poll showed that young voters (age 18-29) were 16 percentage points more likely than 30-44 year olds to say gay and lesbian couples should be allowed to legally marry and 25 percentage points more likely than those ages 60 and above (see Graph 7).

Graph 7: Which comes closest to your views of gay and lesbian couples 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%

41%

37%38% 35% 25%

37%

39%39%

30%

28% 23% 16%

They should be allowed They should be allowed to legally marry to legally form civil unions, but not marry 18-29

30-44

45-59

There should be no legal recognition of their relationship

60+

6

Racial and Ethnic Discrimination Looking at more concrete questions, like attitudes toward racial and ethnic minorities, could help clarify the attitudes of Americans to diversity. The National Election Study (NES) uses “feeling thermometers”3 to assess general attitudes toward specific people as well as societal groups. Historical data on attitudes towards whites and African Americans since 1964 and towards Latinos since 1976 is available from the NES. As Graphs 8 and 9 show, there has been a convergence in feelings about racial/ethnic groups. This convergence has been more dramatic among youth, who show almost identical attitudes towards Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites. Elder Americans have a 3 percentage point difference in attitudes toward Hispanics and Whites. The growing diversity of the population over the years may explain some of the attitudinal changes. Young White Americans' attitudes toward African Americans and Latinos have been basically stable, but the percentage of young people who are White has fallen.

Graph 8: Feeling Thermometers, 18-25 100%

Graph 9: Feeling Thermometers, 26 and over 100% 84%

81%

80%

65% 60%

80%

68% 66%

60%

60%

53%

64%

63%

56%

40%

40%

20%

20%

White

Hispanic

So urce: Natio nal Electio n Study 1964-2002

Black

Year White

Hispanic

So urce: Natio nal Electio n Study 1964-2002

2002

2000

1996

1992

1988

1984

1980

1976

1974

1972

1970

1968

1966

0% 1964

Year Black

2002

2000

1996

1992

1988

1984

1980

1976

1974

1972

1970

1968

1966

1964

0%

7

While a general picture of attitudes toward racial and ethnic minorities is important, several surveys have looked into attitudes regarding governmental policies like affirmative action. The NES, starting in 1986, asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with two statements regarding the treatment of African Americans. The first statement was “over the past few years, blacks have gotten less than they deserve.” The second compared Blacks to other minority groups and stated, “Irish, Italians, Jewish and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their way up. Blacks should do the same without any special favors.” Graph 10 indicates the responses of youth and adults over the past two decades. Youth are more likely than their elders to view the position of Blacks sympathetically. However, compared to 1996, in 2000, both youth and adults were more likely to believe that Blacks should not have special favors.

Graph 10: Attitudes toward Blacks, by Age 80% 70% 60%

Sho uld No t Have Special Favo rs

50% 40% 30% Go tten Less Than They Deserve

20% 10% 0% 1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

Age 18 to 25 Age 18 to 25 So urce: Natio nal Electio n Survey

1998

2000

Age 26 and over Age 26 and over

8

Another instrument, the General Social Survey (GSS) asked respondents questions about race over a number of years. When the GSS first asked in 1972 if respondents would favor a legal ban on interracial marriage, 20 percent of younger Americans and 43 percent of those 26 and older said they would. A generation later, in 2000, these percentages had fallen dramatically – four percent of youth and 10 percent of older Americans still favored such a ban (see Graph 11).

Graph 11: Favor ban on racial intermarriage 50%

43%

40% 30% 20%

20%

10%

10% 4% 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

0%

Age 18-25

Age 26 and Older

So urce: General So cial Survey, 1972 to 2002.

The number of Americans who favored the segregation of neighborhoods fell in a similarly dramatic fashion. In 1972, 24 percent of Americans aged 18 to 25 and 43 percent of Americans 26 and older agreed that “whites have the right to keep blacks out of their neighborhoods and that blacks should respect that right.” By 1996, the percentage who agreed with this statement had fallen to four percent for youth and 13 percent for older Americans. Graph 12 illustrates this trend.

9

Graph 12: Favor segregated neighborhoods 50%

43%

40% 30% 20%

24%

13%

10%

1996

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

1989

1988

1987

1986

1985

1984

1983

1982

1981

1980

1979

1978

1977

1976

1975

1974

1973

1972

Age 18-25

1995

4%

0%

Age 26+

So urce: General So cial Survey, 1972 to 1996.

When asked in 1972 whether they would vote for a black person to be President, 84 percent of youth and 72 percent of those 26 and older said they would. By 1996, 93 percent of youth and adults said they would vote for an African American president (see Graph 13).

Graph 13: Vote for an African-American president 100% 90%

93%

84%

80%

72%

70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Age 18-25

Age 26+

So urce: General So cial Survey, 1972 to 1996

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

1989

1988

1987

1986

1985

1984

1983

1982

1981

1980

1979

1978

1977

1976

1975

1974

1973

1972

0%

10 Opinions of Immigration and Immigrants While generally it appears that discrimination towards homosexuals and racial and ethnic minorities is on the decline, attitudes towards immigration follow a different pattern. As Graph 14 (based on NES data) shows, a plurality of Americans at any age group in any year think immigration should be decreased. Approximately 10 percent believe the U.S. should increase the number of immigrants allowed in the country. Graph 14: Decrease immigration, by Age Both these numbers are highly sensitive to current politics, 70% however, as can be seen by the spike in 1994 of those who said immigration should be decreased. 60% This was around the time NAFTA 48% was being debated in Washington. 50% 47%

40%

42%

42%

30% 20% 10% 0% 1992

Graph 15: Attitudes towards immigrants, by Age

1994

Age 18 to 25

1996

1998

2000

Age 26 and over

So urce: Natio nal Electio n Survey, 1992-2000

70% 60% 50%

60% 51% 49% 42%

40%

35% 35% 37% 29%

30% 20% 10% 0%

"Immigrants today are a burden on our country because they take our jobs, housing and health care" 26-37 38-56 57+

"Immigrants today strengthen our country because of their hard work and talents" 15-25

So urce: CIRCLE/The Civic and P o litical Health o f the Natio n: A Generatio nal P o rtrait, Sep 2002

In 2002, The Civic and Political Health of the Nation survey asked respondents whether “immigrants today strengthen our country because of their hard work and talents” or “immigrants today are a burden on our country because they take our jobs, housing and health care” (see Graph 15). More people in all age groups chose the former statement. This survey was taken one year after the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington, DC.

11 The IEA Civic Education survey provides some information on how the nation’s youth feel about issues of immigration. In many ways, their attitudes reflect those shown in surveys of adults. There is a respect for diversity but skepticism about its impact on society. Graph 16 illustrates the attitudes of 9th graders with respect to immigrants’ rights. Only 14 percent believe that immigrants should be denied the same rights as the native population. The IEA Civic Education Study also asked students about the assimilation of immigrants into American culture. Here, again, youth expressed extremely accepting views. Threequarters of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “immigrants should have the opportunity to keep their own customs and lifestyle” (see Graph 17). At the same time, however, youth understand that along with diversity come challenges. When asked whether large numbers of immigrants make it difficult for a country to be “united and patriotic,” 30 percent agreed (see Graph 18, next page). A substantial percentage of students see a danger for the country in terms of lower levels of unity and patriotism, yet still believe that it is appropriate for immigrants to be able to maintain their own separate culture.

Graph 16: "Immigrants should have all the same rights that everyone else in a country has"

60% 50% 41%

40%

35%

30% 20% 10%

10% 4%

0% strongly disagree

disagree

agree

strongly agree

So urce: IEA Civic Educatio n Study, A ug 2002

Graph 17: "Immigrants' children should have the same opportunities for education that other children in the country have" 50% 42%

42%

agree

strongly agree

40%

30%

20%

10% 3%

5%

0% strongly disagree

disagree

So urce: IEA Civic Educatio n Study, A ug 2002

12

Graph 18: "Having many immigrants makes it difficult for a country to be united and patriotic" 50%

40% 33%

30% 22%

20%

19%

8%

10%

0% strongly disagree

disagree

agree

So urce: IEA Civic Educatio n Study, A ug 2002

strongly agree

13 Encountering Different People While the data presented so far indicate that Americans of all ages have developed more accepting attitudes towards diversity over the years, there are some limitations in practice. For instance, the number of American youth who say they attend church only with people of the same race dropped from 69 percent (and 65 percent of older Americans) in 1978 to 53 percent in 1994. While this does represent a slight rise in diversity (if not tolerance), it still means that over half of churchgoers, typically among the most civically engaged Americans, attend uni-racial churches (see Graph 19).

Graph 19: Attend uniracial church 80% 70% 60%

69% 53%

65%

50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Age 18-25

Age 26+

Source: General Social Survey, 1978 t o 1994 .

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

1989

1988

1987

1986

1985

1984

1983

1982

1981

1980

1979

1978

0%

14 The Social Capital Survey (SCS) asked respondents whether they were members of participatory groups (like the PTA or a church group). If so, they were asked to identify how many of the other members were of the same race as the respondent. Graph 20 shows what percent of respondents answered “all” or “most.” Whites are the least likely to share membership with people of other races. While White youth are more exposed to racial difference, Black and Hispanic youth are more isolated than their elders.

Graph 20: All or most members of participatory group that are of the same race, by race and age 0.8 70% 66%

0.7 0.6

75% 73% 69% 66%

61% 58%

56% 56% 52%51%

0.5

48%

45% 42% 39%

0.4

30% 28%30%

0.3

23%

0.2 0.1 0 All

White 18-25

Black 26-37

Hispanic 38-56

57+

So urce: So cial Capital Survey, 2002

Asian

15 Another question asked how often friends came over to socialize and then asked how often friends of a different race came to the respondent’s house. As Graph 21 shows, youth are the most social group and are also more likely than their elders to invite friends of a different race over to their homes. The SCS also asked some questions about social and economic differences. For example, it asked a series of questions about “personal friends.” These included whether the respondent had a personal friend who was gay or had been on welfare. While youth are more social in general than other age groups and more likely to have friends of a different race, they are slightly less likely to have friends of a different religion or economic background (see Graph 22).

Graph 21: Frequency of friend's visits 40% 34%

35% 30%

24%

25% 20%

20%

20% 18% 14%

15%

10%

10%

Unlike the GSS, the SCS cannot 6% speak to changes over time. It 5% may be that youth were even less likely to meet people of other social 0% and economic backgrounds in 18-25 26-37 38-56 57+ earlier decades. However, these Invited friends over Invited friends of other race over results, in combination with the So urce: So cial Capital Survey GSS findings about uni-racial church-going, seem to indicate a population that is not becoming more integrated in civil society groups.

Graph 22: "Do you have a persional friend who is ______?" by Age 90% 80% 71%

70%

64%

78%

75%

81%

79%

74% 64%

60% 50% 42%

40%

44% 45%

44%

46% 46%

33%

30%

30% 20% 10% 0% Manual Worker

On Welfare 18-25

26-37

Different Religion 38-56

57+

So urce: So cial Capital Survey, 2002

Gay

16

Generational Changes in Attitudes Overall, surveys indicate that people’s attitudes towards homosexuals, racial/ethnic minorities, and immigrants are becoming increasingly more accepting. Using the GSS we can try to figure out whether some of these differences in attitudes are a function of age, a larger societal issue, or some historical event. Looking at the issue of inter-racial marriage, the GSS asks: "Do you think there should be laws against marriages between (Negroes/Blacks/African- Americans) and whites?” Graph 23 shows how the attitudes of age cohorts (or generations) towards a ban on racial intermarriage changed as the groups aged. For example, Baby Boomers, those born between 1956 and 1964, became less likely to favor a ban on racial intermarriage as they aged. Moreover, in nearly all years, the most tolerant people are the youngest. Graph 23: Favor Ban on Racial Intermarriage, by Generation 80%

69%

70% 60% 50% 40%

23%

30% 20%

20%

10%

6% 02

00

20

98

20

96

19

94

19

92

19

90

19

88

19

86

19

84

19

82

19

80

19

78

19

76

19

74

19

19

19

72

0%

Dot Net (born before 1976) Xers (born 1965-1976) Boomers (born 1946 and 1964) Greatest Generation (born 1945-1926) Born Before 1926 Born Before 1906 Source: General Social Survey, 1972 to 2002

This graph suggests that the growing support for racial intermarriage is a function of history since all generations shifted their attitudes towards racial intermarriage. Additionally, there may be a small age effect here as throughout the years, the youngest generations are also the least likely to favor a ban on inter-racial marriage. For more information on generational changes in attitudes, please see the CIRCLE Fact Sheet entitled “Young People and the First Amendment.”

17

NOTES 1

We thank Chris Herbst, Mark Hugo Lopez, Carrie Donovan, and Peter Levine for helpful comments on previous drafts of this fact sheet. All errors in interpretation are our own. 2

The 2004 NEP exit poll found that young people were more likely to support allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry than to form a civil union. This difference in findings between the NEP exit poll and the 2004 National Youth Survey may be caused by a variety of factors. To begin, the two surveys are measuring attitudes of two different populations. The NEP exit poll is a sample of 18-30 year olds voters whereas the 2004 National Youth Survey is a sample of the general 15-25 year old population. Additionally, the questions were worded differently in the two surveys. The NEP exit poll asks, “Which comes closest to your view of gay and lesbian couples: 1)They should be allowed to legally marry 2) They should be allowed to legally form civil unions, but not marry 3) There should be no legal recognition of their relationships”. The 2004 National Youth Survey asks whether or not homosexuals should or should not be able to have the right to do a variety of things including “form a civil union of legal partnership” and “get legally married”. 3

The National Election Study uses a “feeling thermometers, which are 100-point Likert scales, to measure the respondents’ reactions to a variety of different issues.

Suggest Documents