CHICAS. Dynamic modelling of kidney function with interventions at acute kidney injury occurrences

Dynamic modelling of kidney function with interventions at acute kidney injury occurrences ¨ ur Asar Ozg¨ [email protected] with Peter J. Diggle...
Author: Walter Small
18 downloads 1 Views 676KB Size
Dynamic modelling of kidney function with interventions at acute kidney injury occurrences ¨ ur Asar Ozg¨ [email protected]

with Peter J. Diggle, James Ritchie and Philip Kalra

25 March 2014 MRC Conference on Biostatistics, Cambridge

CHICAS combining health information, computation and statistics

1 / 15

Outline

I

Motivation

I

CRISIS Cohort

I

Clinical Identification of AKI

I

Statistical Modelling

I

Results

I

Discussion

2 / 15

Motivation

I

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined based on I I

I

kidney damage, e.g. increased albuminuria or proteinuria decreased kidney function, e.g. GFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73m2

Early stages of CKD are I I I

reversible mostly asymptomatic usually detected during the assessment of comorbid conditions

I

Mostly gradual decline in kidney function

I

If progressive might lead to kidney failure within months

I

CKD patients are in risk of abrupt changes in kidney function

3 / 15

Motivation

I

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI): sudden falls in kidney function (in hours to days)

I

Ranges between I I

renal impairment due to mild alterations w/o actual damage complete renal failure

I

Common and potentially catastrophic in hospitalised patients

I

Mostly associated with diabetes and/or cardivascular diseases

I

No specific treatment, treatment is only supportive

I

CKD is a risk factor for AKI

I

The influence of AKI on long-term kidney function is unknown

4 / 15

10

?

5

?

0

GFR

15

20

Motivation

0

1

2

3

4

5

time 5 / 15

CRISIS Cohort I

Chronic Renal Insufficiency Standards Implementation Study (CRISIS), Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK

I

A cohort of CKD patients, staggered entry, irregular follow-up

I

2,221 patients, followed between 15 Nov 2000 - 28 Feb 2013

I

1,376 (62.0%) were male, 845 (38%) were female

I

2,139 (96.3%) were Caucasian, 82 (3.7%) were non-Caucasian Total amount of 46,149 hospital visits

I

I I

40,877 (88.6%) out-patient 5,272 (11.4%) in-patient

I

Number of visits: 1 - 195, median of 13

I

Total follow-up time: 0 - 10.9, median of 2.6 (in years)

I

Baseline age: 20.0 - 94.3, median of 66.9 (in years)

6 / 15

1

2

log(eGFR)

3

4

5

6

CRISIS Cohort

20

40

60

80

100

Age (in years)

eGFR = 175 ×



SCr 88.4

−1.154

× age−0.203 × 0.742 I(female) × 1.21 I(black) 7 / 15

Clinical Identification of AKI I I

101 patients (5%), at least one AKI, any stage ⇒ a rare event Based on Creatinine observations by comparing I I I I

I I

RC = (Creatininet − Creatinines )/Creatinines (s < t) AKI was identified by (the AKIN criteria, Mehta et al., 2007) I I I

I

most recent OP with first IP first IP with other IPs adjacent IPs two successive OPs taken within 48 hours

stage 1: if 0.5 ≤ RC < 1 stage 2: if 1 ≤ RC < 2 stage 3: if 2 ≤ RC

AKI occuring within 72 hours belong to a single episode

8 / 15

Clinical Identification of AKI I

Combine stage 1, 2 and 3 into a single stage

I

Censor the trajectories at the 2nd AKI

I

Omit the observations that belong to the first AKI episode Total amount of 5,595 hospital visits

I

I I

I

Total follow-up time for I I

I

3,761 (67.2%) belong to pre-AKI 1,834 (32.8%) belong to post-AKI pre-AKI : 0.003 - 8.3, median of 1.1 (in years) post-AKI : 0.003 - 6.6, median of 0.3 (in years)

Amongst the 101 patients I I I I

29 12 34 26

(28.7 (11.9 (33.7 (25.7

%) %) %) %)

were censored at 2nd AKI had RRT (before 2nd AKI) died (before 2nd AKI and RRT) were administratively censored

9 / 15

Clinical Identification of AKI

4 3

log(eGFR)

1

2

3 2 1

log(eGFR)

4

5

Censored at RRT (n2=12)

5

Censored at 2nd AKI (n1=29)

−5

0 Years after AKI

5

−5

0

5

Years after AKI

10 / 15

Clinical Identification of AKI

4 3

log(eGFR)

1

2

3 2 1

log(eGFR)

4

5

No 2nd AKI, No RRT, Alive (n5=26)

5

Censored by death (n3=34)

−5

0 Years after AKI

5

−5

0

5

Years after AKI

11 / 15

Statistical Modelling I

Based on the preliminary analyses Yij = Xij α + Ui + Wi (tij ) + Zij

I I

(1)

Ui : random intercept, ∼ N(0, ω 2 ) Wi (t): non-stationary Gaussian stochastic process 1. Replace Wi (t) by bi tij , (Ui , bi ) ∼ MVN(0, Σ) 2. Brownian motion: cov (W (s), W (t)) = σ 2 min(s, t) 3. Integrated Brownian motion:   2 cov (W (s), W (t)) = σ 2 min2(s,t) max(s, t) − min3(s,t) 4. Integrated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process cov (W (s), W (t)) =

I

κ2 2ν 3

2νmin(s, t) + e −νt + e −νs − 1 − e −ν|t−s|



Zij : measurement error, ∼ N(0, τ 2 ) 12 / 15

Results log(eGFR) = α0 + α1 ∗ tij + α2 ∗ (tij )+ + α3 ∗ (tij − 0.5)+ + α4 ∗ I(0 ≤ tij < 0.5) + α5 ∗ I(0.5 ≤ tij )+ Ui + Wi (tij ) + Zij (2) I

tij : age at measurement - age at AKI

I

(tij − a)+ : 0 if tij ≤ a, tij − a if tij > a Model with Wi (tij ) as Random Slope Brownian Motion Integrated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Integrated Brownian Motion

Max. logLik -1554.31 -415.44 -415.44 -1108.94

13 / 15

Results

Parameter α0 α1 α2 α3 α4 α5

Variable Intercept tij (tij )+ (tij − 0.5)+ I(0 ≤ tij < 0.5) I(0.5 ≤ tij )

Estimate 3.072 -0.074 0.737 -0.648 -0.245 -0.390

SE 0.067 0.016 0.154 0.184 0.019 0.059

p