CHF: Systolic Vs. Diastolic Dysfunction: Dx & Rx Eman Hamad MD, FACC, FHFSA Assistant Professor of Medicine Medical Director Mechanical circulatory support program Associate Program Director General Cardiology & Heart Failure Fellowships
Temple University Hospital 11.8.2016
CHF: Systolic Vs. Diastolic Dysfunction: Dx & Rx
Disclosures: I have no conflict of interest in relation to this
presentation. Will not be discussing any off label use of any medications or devices
Outline Background & scope of Problem Definition & Etiology Pathophysiology Classification of heart failure Risk factors Signs, Symptoms Diagnosis Approach to management of HF Clinical Trials & guidelines
Background & Scope of Problem
Heart Failure Expected to Become More Common as Population Ages Heart Failure Patients in US (Millions)
12
10
10
4.7 million symptomatic
patients; estimated 10 million in 2037
8 6 4
550,000 new cases/year
4.7 3.5
2 0 1991
2000
2037*
*Rich M. J Am Geriatric Soc. 1997;45:968–974. Outlook for Heart Failure: Five-year Technology and Business Assessment. The Advisory Board; 2007 American Heart Association. 2001 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. 2000.
Survival after the onset of CHF in Framingham Heart Study Subjects….Poor Prognosis
Overall 50% 5-year mortality
50%
Years
Median survival was 1.7 years for men with CHF and 3.2 year for women AHA, 1998 Heart and Statistical Update NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics
Ho Circulation 1993;88:107-115
Projected Mortality for Advanced HF Exceeds Other Terminal Diseases
More deaths from heart failure than from all forms of cancer combined •Rose EA, et al. Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1435-43.
Recurrent admissions and Survival in Heart Failure
•
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(12):1209-1221. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1029
Causes of Hospital Readmission for Congestive Heart Failure
Over 2/3 of HF Hospitalizations Preventable Diet Noncompliance 24%
16% Inappropriate Rx
Rx Noncompliance 24%
19% Failure to Seek Care
Annals of Internal Medicine 122:415-21, 1995
17% Other
What is the Prognosis of HFpEF? Annual death rate ≈5% ≈50% die of non-cardiovascular diseases Risk factors for mortality in HFpEF Increasing age, male gender Higher natriuretic peptide levels, higher NYHA class Coronary artery or peripheral vascular disease Diabetes mellitus, chronic renal insufficiency Lower EF, restrictive filling pattern on Doppler ECHO Low and very high BMI (in HFpEF)
Massie BM et al for I-PRESERVE Investigators, NEJM. 4;359(23):2456-67. 2008 Nov 11.
Impact of HF • As our population ages, the epidemic continues to grow. • Single largest expense for Medicare • Heart failure care ranks among the leading U.S. healthcare expenditures.
Major public health problem resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality… Projected to reach 44.6 billion in 2016
•Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009;119(3):480-6. • Adams KF, Zannad F. Clinical definition and epidemiology of advanced heart failure. Am Heart J 1998;135:S204-S215. •Roger VL .Circulation AHA online 12/15/10; ACS, Cancer Facts and Figures 2010
Definition & Etiology
Definition ”HF is a complex clinical syndrome that
results from any structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood.“ Ventricular filling Diastole Ejection of blood Systole Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.2013;62(16):1495-1539
Systolic and Diastolic Dysfunction
Definition of Heart Failure –ACCF/AHA Guideline Classification
Ejection Fraction ≤40%
I. Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) II. Heart Failure with ≥50% Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
Description systolic HF. Randomized clinical trials HFrEF efficacious therapies have been demonstrated referred to as diastolic HF.
a. HFpEF, Borderline
41% to 49%
Their characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes appear similar to HFpEF.
b. HFpEF, Improved
>40%
subset of patients with HFpEF previously had HFrEF. may be clinically distinct from those with persistently preserved or reduced EF. Further research is needed to better characterize these patients.
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.2013;62(16):1495-1539
Etiology
Ischemic- Cardiomyopathy (CM) Hypertensive HD Valvular HD-CM (AS/AR/MR) Metabolic: −
↑/↓ thyroid/pheochromocytoma
−
Anthracyclines/Etoh/cocaine/amphetamines
Viral CM/ familial
Toxins:
Idiopathic Dilated CM
Infiltrative -hemochromatosis/ amyloid HCM PPCM Congenital Some are reversible (tachy, Etoh) Biventricular Failure/ RV failure
Heart Failure- Risk Factors Primary risk factors
Coronary artery disease (CAD) Advancing age
Contributing risk factors
Hypertension Diabetes Tobacco use Obesity High cholesterol Valvular heart disease
Anemias Congenital heart defects Hyperthyroid, Fever, infection, stress Cardiotoxic Chemo, radiation
Pathophysiology
The Vicious Cycle of Heart Failure
Cardiac Remodeling and the Myocyte Myocardial infarction
Pressure overload
Inflammatory heart muscle disease
Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
Volume overload
Gross Changes During Remodeling • As the heart remodels, the geometry changes • The heart is less elliptical and more spherical to optimize the relationship between LV volume and cardiac output • Over time, changes in ventricular mass, composition and volume develop
Classification of Heart Failure
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification of HF 1994 Class
Description
I
Patient has no limitation of physical activity. No symptoms arise from ordinary physical activity.
II
Patient has slight limitation of physical activity due to mild symptoms (fatigue, shortness of breath, palpitations and/or angina) during ordinary activity. Patient is comfortable at rest.
III
Patient has marked limitation of physical activity due to symptoms even at less-thanordinary activity. Patient is comfortable at rest.
IV
Patient is unable to do any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms experienced at rest.
Patient Population per NYHA Class
The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. 9th ed. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown & Co; 1994:253-256.
ACC/AHA HF Staging 1-Year Mortality >50%
D Refractory, symptoms at rest and recurrent hospitalizations
C
15%-30%
Structural heart disease, prior or current symptoms
B
5%-10%
Structural heart disease, asymptomatic: left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, low LVEF, dilatation, valvular disease
A
2%-3%
High-risk patients with no structural or symptomatic disease: hypertension, atherosclerotic disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, family history, cardiotoxic drugs/Chemo
Hunt SA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53;e1-e90.
Signs and symptoms
FACES of Heart Failure Fatigue Activity decrease Cough (especially supine) Edema Shortness of breath
Symptoms
Signs of Heart Failure ↑ JVP Rales S3 Edema Crackles or decreased breath sounds Cardiomegaly Ascites Cool Extremities
Diagnosis
Lab Analysis in Heart Failure CBC
Since anemia can exacerbate heart failure Serum electrolytes and creatinine before starting high dose diuretics Fasting Blood glucose To evaluate for possible diabetes mellitus Fasting lipid profile Liver Function tests Thyroid function tests Thyrotoxicosis can result in A. Fib, & hypothyroidism can results in HF. Iron studies To screen for hereditary hemochromatosis as cause of heart failure. ANA To evaluate for possible lupus Antiphospholipids Viral studies If viral myocarditis suspected HIV
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.2013;62(16):1495-1539.
BNP Diagnostic values for CHF BNP > 400 pg/L – acute CHF present BNP 100 pg/L – 400 pg/L Diagnostic of CHF with
Sensitivity 90% Specificity 76% Predictive accuracy 83% R/O pulmonary embolism, LV dysfunction without acute CHF or cor pulmonale or other reasons for elevated BNP
BNP < 100 pg/L – 98% negative predictive accuracy JACC 2001;37(2):379-85.
Chest X-ray in Heart Failure Cardiomegaly Cephalization of the pulmonary vessels Kerley B-lines Pleural effusions
Cardiac Testing in Heart Failure Electrocardiogram: May show specific cause of heart failure: Ischemic heart disease Dilated cardiomyopathy: first degree AV block, LBBB, Left anterior fascicular block LVH
Echocardiogram: Left ventricular ejection fraction Structural/valvular abnormalities Diastolic function RV function and PH
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.2013;62(16):1495-1539.
Cardiac stress Testing in Heart Failure Treadmill Exercise Machine
For HF patients, the treadmill exercise test is used to: Evaluate tolerance for exercise Assess response to treatment Evaluate for ischemic changes
Nuclear Cardiac Scan • Evaluate: o Ischemia o viability
o Function
Cardiac MRI • Used to diagnose many conditions including: o Coronary heart disease o Viability o Ejection fraction and volume o Pericarditis (the membrane around the heart is inflamed) o Valvular disease o Congenital heart defects o Cardiac tumors o Amyloid, sarcoid , other infiltrative o Myocarditis
Cardiac Catheterization Left and Right heart Catheterization o Visualizing coronary arteries o Hemodynamics (NOT for routine use) o uncertain fluid status, perfusion, or systemic or pulmonary vascular resistance o Symptomatic hypotension not responding to therapy o Renal function is worsening with therapy o Inotrope use or MCS /Transplant eval
Endomyocardial biopsy (NOT for routine use) If a specific diagnosis is suspected that would change therapy
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.2013;62(16):1495-1539.
Management and Goals of Treatment • • •
PREVENTION DRUGS & DEVICES CLINICAL TRIALS & GUIDELINES
Goals of Care Improve symptoms Improve quality of life Prevent progression of LV
dysfunction
Reverse remodeling
Reduce hospitalization
and morbidity Reduce mortality
Sudden death
Prevention Hypertension Diabetes mellitus Obesity Metabolic syndrome Coronary artery disease Prior myocardial infarction Left ventricular hypertrophy Smoking /toxins Advanced age
Reducing Risk Factors
Risk factors for HFpEF? •
For HFpEF • Older, more hypertensive, and higher prevalence of AF (than in HFrEF) •
CAD prevalence comparatively lower
•
More common in women (by 2:1)
•
Interventions that can help in the prevention of HFpEF?
•
Blood Pressure Control
•
Both BP/HR and Volume management can help symptoms
Treating Hypertension to Prevent HF Aggressive blood
pressure control: Decreases risk of new HF by ~ 50% 56% in DM2
Lancet 1991;338:1281-5 (STOP-Hypertension JAMA 1997;278:212-6 (SHEP) UKPDS Group. UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998;317:703-713
Aggressive BP
control in patients with prior MI: Decreases risk of new HF by ~ 80%
CHF Incidence Comparing the diabetic and Non-diabetic Non-Diabetic
Diabetic
Gregory A. Nichols et al. Dia Care 2004;27:1879-1884 ©2004 by American Diabetes Association
Management of Non-Cardiac Comorbidities Cognitive dysfunction Anemia
Renal dysfunction
Respiratory Disorders
Depression
Arthritis
Polypharmacy
Drugs, Devices & Clinical Trials
β-Blocker Saves Lives in Heart Failure? β–blocker is the most important progress in Heart Failure …. It actually helps the heart !!
Standard Treatment ACE-I Beta Blocker Symptomatic relief
ARB Aldosterone I Isordil/Hydralaz ine Devices
ACE Inhibitors in CVD But No HF Treatment with ACE
inhibitors decreases the risk of CV death, MI, stroke, or cardiac arrest.
Placebo
HOPE
16 14 12 % MI, 10 Stroke, 8 CV Death 6 4 2 0
Ramipril 22% rel. risk red. p < .001 0
1
2
3
4
Years
20% risk reduction EUROPA
15
Placebo
12
% MI, CV Death, 9 Cardiac 6 Arrest
Perindopril 20% rel. risk red. p = .0003
3 0 0
1
2
3
Years
NEJM 2000;342:145-53 (HOPE)
Lancet 2003;362:782-8 (EUROPA
4
5
Treatment of Post-MI Patients with Asymptomatic LV Dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 40%) SAVE Study
All-cause mortality ↓19% CV mortality ↓21% HF development ↓37% Recurrent MI ↓25%
0.3
Mortality Rate
Placebo
0.2
Captopril 0.1
19% rel. risk reduction p = 0.019
0 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Years
Pfeffer et al. NEJM 1992;327:669-77
Enalapril in Asymptomatic LVD to Severe HF SOLVD Prevention
(Asymptomatic LVD) 20% 29%
death or HF hosp. death or new HF
CONSENSUS
(Severe
Heart Failure) 40% 31% 27%
mortality at 6 mos. mortality at 1 year mortality at end of
study
SOLVD Treatment (Chronic Heart Failure) 16%
No difference in incidence of sudden cardiac death
mortality
SOLVD Investigators. N Engl J Med 1992;327:685-91 SOLVD Investigators. N Engl J Med 1991;325:293-302 CONSENSUS Study Trial Group. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1429-35
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline Pharmacologic Therapy: ACE Inhibitors ACE inhibitors are recommended for
symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with an LVEF ≤ 40%.
Strength of Evidence = A
ACE inhibitors should be titrated to
target doses as tolerated used in clinical trials (as tolerated Srength of Evidence = C
ACE inhibitors are recommended as
routine therapy for asymptomatic patients with an LVEF ≤ 40%.
Post MI
Strength of Evidence = B
Non Post-MI
Strength of Evidence = C
Benazepril (Lotensin) Enalapril (Vasotec) Lisinopril (Zestril) Quinapril (Accupril) Ramipril (Altace) Others
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline Pharmacologic Therapy: Substitutes for ACEI It is recommended that other therapy be substituted
for ACE inhibitors in the following circumstances: In
patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors due to cough, ARBs are recommended.
Strength of Evidence = A
Patients
intolerant to ACE inhibitors from hyperkalemia or renal insufficiency are likely to experience the same side effects with ARBs. In these cases, the combination of hydralazine and an oral nitrate should be considered.
Strength of Evidence = C
Effect of Beta Blockade on Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure Post-MI HF Severity
Target Dose (mg)
Outcome
Study
Drug
US Carvedilol1
carvedilol
mild/ moderate
6.2525 BID
↓48% disease progression (p= .007)
CIBIS-II2
bisoprolol
moderate/ severe
10 QD
↓34% mortality (p