CHEMISTRY SPRING 2009 ORGANIC QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS LABORATORY REPORT FORM UNKNOWN CODE NUMBER: X15

CHEMISTRY 30132 SPRING 2009 ORGANIC QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS LABORATORY REPORT FORM UNKNOWN CODE NUMBER: __X15___ NAME: __John Doe_____ Date: ____02/18/2...
Author: Colin Goodman
6 downloads 0 Views 122KB Size
CHEMISTRY 30132 SPRING 2009 ORGANIC QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS LABORATORY REPORT FORM UNKNOWN CODE NUMBER: __X15___ NAME: __John Doe_____

Date: ____02/18/2009____

Identity of Unknown: ___3 – NitroXXXX_____

Physical State: _____Solid______

1. PHYSICAL CONSTANTS (observed and published) a. List of values measured in the laboratory:

b. List of values from the literature:

M.P. Range: ____xxx-zzz oC __________

Lit. Value (ref): ___ yyy oC (text; pg xxx)

__

2. SOLUBILITY TESTS: soluble (+), insoluble (-) H2 O

5 % NaOH

5 % NaHCO3

5 % HCl

Conc. H2SO4

Ether

-

+

+

N/A

N/A

N/A

Reaction to litmus (water soluble compounds only): ___N/A____ Solubility Classification: ____A1_______ 3. SODIUM FUSION ANALYSIS X - (halogen) ___(-)ve_____

CN - ___(+)ve____

S 2- ___(-)ve____

4. NEUTRALIZATION EQUIVALENT (NE): Run #1_____17.9 ml_______

Run #2_____17.8 ml_______

Calculations: Neutralization equivalent (NE) =

Weight of sample (g) * 1000 Volume of the alkali (ml) * M

NE

=

0.2 g * 1000 17.8 ml * 0.0683 M

NE

=

164.51 (observed / calculated)

Neutralization equivalent (NE) = Molecular weight of the compound NE

=

167.12 (MDL Beilstein)

Run #3_____17.8 ml_______

5. INFRARED SPECTRUM: N/A 6. NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTRUM: N/A 7. MASS SPECTRUM: N/A 8. CLASSIFICATION AND SUB-CLASSIFICATION TESTS No.

Name of Test

Specific Observations and conclusion (+ve or –ve)

(1)

Sodium Bicarbonate Test – Test for carboxylic acids (Experiment 31)

Gas evolved spontaneously. (+)ve test – presence of a carboxylic acid

(2)

Bromine Water Test – Test for phenols or anilines (Experiment 46)

Bromine color did not discharge; solution remained brown color. (-)ve test – absence of a phenol or aniline

(3)

Sodium Hydroxide Test – Test for Aromatic Nitro groups (Experiment 44)

Initially no observation; after 30 minutes, solution turned pale yellow. (+)ve test – presence of nitro group (not a very strong conclusion)

(4)

Potassium Permanganate Test – Test for alkenes or alkynes (Experiment 38)

Solution remained purple color; no precipitate was formed. (-)ve test – absence of alkene or alkyne

(5)

Chromic Anhydride Test – Test for 10 or 20 alcohols (Experiment 08)

Solution remained orange. (-)ve test – absence of 10 or 20 alcohol

(6)

2,4-DNP Test – Test for aldehydes or ketones (Experiment 12)

No observation; precipitate was not formed. (-)ve test – absence of aldehyde or ketone

Specific functional groups consistent with parts 2 and 3: __–COOH & –NO2___ (Classification tests were carried out after listing a table of possible compounds within a particular melting point range. Therefore tests for 30 alcohols, amines, amides, and other functional groups were not required to be carried out.)

9. TABLE OF POSSIBLE COMPOUNDS Compound Name & Structure

Melting point (MP) (oC)

NE

Specific Reason for Ruling Out

52.03

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.51; but the NE of this molecule is much lower.

186.21

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.51; but the NE of this molecule is much higher.

164.16

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The unknown did not contain a keto-group (2,4-DNP test); but this molecule contains a ketogroup.

Propanedioic acid (malonic acid)

135d

1-Naphthaleneethanoic acid

135

2-Acetylbenzoic acid (aspirin)

135

1,5,5-Trimethylcyclopentene-2-carboxylic acid

135

154.21

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The unknown was saturated; but this is unsaturated.

2,4-Hexadienoic acid (sorbic acid)

135

112.13

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is lower. The unknown was saturated; but this is unsaturated.

3-Phenylpropynoic acid (phenylpropiolic acid)

137

146.15

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is lower. The unknown was saturated; but this is unsaturated.

(+/-)-cis-Camphenic acid

137

154.22

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The unknown was saturated; but this is unsaturated.

E-2-chloro-3-phenyl-2-propenoic acid

138

182.61

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The unknown does not contains Cl (Na fusion); but this contains Chlorine (Cl). The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is higher.

2-Methylpropanedioic acid

138d

59.05

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is lower.

2-Pyridinecarboxylic acid (2-picolinic acid)

138

123.11

The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is lower. (did not ruled out)

5-Chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid

139

201.57

The unknown does not contains Cl (Na fusion); but this contains Chlorine (Cl). The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is much higher.

75.04

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is lower. The unknown did not contain a –OH; but this does contain.

(R,S)-2,3-Dihydroxybutanedioic acid

140

3-Nitrobenzoic acid

141

167.12

This molecule fits all the classification descriptions as well as the observed neutralization equivalent (NE). (can not be ruled out)

2-Chloro-4-nitrobenzoic acid

142

201.57

The unknown does not contains Cl (Na fusion); but this contains Chlorine (Cl). The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is much higher.

4-Chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid

142

201.57

The unknown does not contains Cl (Na fusion); but this contains Chlorine (Cl). The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is much higher.

Z-3-Chloro-3-phenyl-2-propenoic acid

142

182.61

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The unknown does not contains Cl (Na fusion); but this contains Chlorine (Cl). The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is higher.

2-Chlorobenzoic acid

142

156.57

The unknown does not contains Cl (Na fusion); but this contains Chlorine (Cl). The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen.

Octanedioic acid (Suberic acid)

144

87.10

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is much lower.

2-Aminobenzoic acid (anthranilic acid)

144

137.14

The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is lower. (did not ruled out)

2,4,5-Trimethoxybenzoic acid (asaronic acid)

144

212.20

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is much higher.

2-Chlorophenoxyethanoic acid

146

186.59

The unknown does not contains Cl (Na fusion); but this contains Chlorine (Cl). The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen.

2-Nitrobenzoic acid

146

167.12

This molecule fits all the classification descriptions as well as the observed neutralization equivalent (NE). (can not be ruled out)

2-Carboxyphenyl-2-oxoethanoic acid

146

97.07

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is much lower.

212.25

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is much higher.

67.05

The unknown contains Nitrogen (Na fusion); but this does not contain any Nitrogen. The observed neutralization equivalent (NE) is 164.5; but NE of this molecule is much lower.

Diphenylethanoic acid (diphenylacetic acid)

148

Oxodiethanoic acid (diglycolic acid)

148

MP range used to construct Table 9 (Carboxylic acids): ___135 – 148 oC ____ (Observed melting point of the purified unknown compound was 140-141oC. However if some specks of impurities were present the melting point could be slightly lowered. Therefore in choosing the range, 5 oC was taken below and 7 oC was taken above the observed melting point. No compounds were omitted.)

10. REFINED LIST o

Compound Name

MP ( C)

NE

2-XXX

138

3-XXX

2-YYY 2-YYY

Derivatives and their Melting Points (oC) (Amide)

(4-Toluidide)

123.11

107

104

141

167.12

143

162

144

137.14

109

151

146

167.12

176

203

11. PREPARATION OF DERIVATIVE Name of Derivative

Observed MP range

Literature MP and Reference

Amide

139 – 140 oC

143 oC (text; pg 606)

12. CONCLUSIONS The first unknown (A4), was a white solid. The first step was to carry out the solubility tests. The compound was insoluble in cold water. It dissolved completely in hot/boiling water (The water was cooled and the compound was recovered. This showed that the compound had not decomposed or reacted). Considering the compound to be insoluble in water, it was treated with 5% NaOH, in which it dissolved. Next it was treated with 5% NaHCO3 and it dissolved. This classified the compound in the A1 solubility class. It was a carboxylic acid with more than six carbons, a phenol with electron withdrawing groups or a beta-diketone. Since the compound was soluble in hot/boiling water, it was next treated with ether, in which it dissolved completely. Next the partially dissolved compound was tested with litmus paper. It turned blue litmus to red color, showing that it was an acid. This also classified the compound to the solubility class SA, which stated that the compound would be a monofunctional carboxylic acid with five or fewer carbons or an arylsulfonic acid. This was done in order to include all the possibilities. Since both solubility classes spoke of carboxylic acid either with more than six carbons or less than six carbons, it could be inferred that the unknown was a boarder-line situation. However this inference was not taken for granted; each possibility was tested.

Secondly, the melting point of the crude compound was measured to be 136-138 oC. Once purified and recrystallized, a sharp melting point was observed; which was 140-141 oC (In recrystallizing the compound water was used as the solvent for the unknown was partially soluble in water). Thirdly, classification tests were carried out. The Sodium Bicarbonate test gave positive results. It was inferred that a carboxylic group was present. This was enough evidence to have formed that first list of possible compounds. However a Bromine Water test was carried out to look for the possibility of a phenol. This gave negative results, making it possible to infer that a phenol was absent. Next, a possible list of compounds was put together solely based on the melting point range and the presence of a carboxylic group. Usually in the presence of impurities the melting point of compounds decreases slightly. Although the unknown compound was purified there could have been a chance for some traces of impurities to lower the observed melting point. Thus when listing the compounds 5oC were taken below and 7oC were taken above, giving a range of 13 degrees (135-148 oC). There were 25 possible compounds in the list. There structures were drawn-out and studied. Different functional groups were noted down. Among the compounds the following functional groups were present; -NO2, -Cl, carbonyl, alkene, alkyne, -OH, NH2, and ethers in addition to the carboxylic group. Next, classification tests were carried out again to verify the possible functional groups that were present in the compound list. Sodium Hydroxide test was carried out to look for the presence of a -NO2 group. The colorization of the solution occurred after a prolonged period of time. This was not a very conclusive test for the results should have been immediate. However the presence of the –COOH group which is also a EWG on the benzene would have deactivated the system further. This explains the long time it took for the positive result and could be concluded as a positive test. However, this result was not used to eliminate any possibility. The other classification test that were carried out included; the Potassium Permanganate test for unsaturations, the Chromic Anhydride test for the presence of 10 or 20 alcohols and the 2,4-DNP test for the presence of carbonyl groups. All three of these classification tests gave negative results and the absence of alkenes, alkynes, 10 or 20 alcohols, ketones or aldehydes was concluded. Other classifications such as the test for amides, amines, amino acids, 30 alcohols and all the rest were not carried out, because they were not included in the list of the possible compounds in the selected melting point range. The next analysis/classification was the Na fusion analysis. Here the compound was tested for the presence of Cl-, CN-, and S2-. The test for Nitrogen was positive, while it was negative for both Sulfur and Halogens. This allowed shortening the list of the large amount of possible compounds. After the results of the Na fusion and all the other classification tests, sufficient data was available to refine the table and reduce the number of compounds to four. These compounds are included in the refined list (No.10). Next a titration was carried out to compute the neutralization equivalent (NE). After three careful runs, the NE was calculated to be 164.51. The NE was able to eliminate two more of the compounds on the refined

listed. However the NE was unable to distinguish between 3-XXX and 2-XXX, for they had the same neutralization equivalent. Thus it was required to form derivatives to distinguish between the few possibilities left (The NE value is unique to given compounds, but it was not use to discard the other two possibilities and derivatives were formed in order to identify the proper compound). After studying the differences between the melting points of the derivatives of the four possible compounds, the amide and the 4-Toluidide derivatives were prepared. The purified amide had a melting point of 139 – 140 oC which clearly separated the 3-XXX acid from the rest of the possible compound and especially from the 2-XXX, for the 2-YYY acid and 2-ZZZ acid could have been ruled out based on the neutralization equivalent as well. To reconfirm the identity a second derivative was formed. However it was not as successful as the amide, for its pure yield was significantly small and the melting point was significantly lower. Although the melting point was about 10 units lower than the expected, this too supports the fact the compound was 3XXX over the 2-XXX, for there is a clear difference between the melting points of the 4-Toluidide derivatives of the two compounds. As in the case of all research, the unknown molecule did not identify itself directly. With the help of a systematic elimination process, it was possible to identify 3-XXX. All the tests and analyses were in favor of 3XXX. The melting point of the purified compound 140-141 oC, is overlapping that of 3-XXX. The neutralization equivalent 164.51 is close to that of 3-XXX, which is 167.21. The different of 3 units could be due to the presence of slight impurities in the compound or a slight variation in the standardized solution of NaOH. The presence of the only functional groups was WWW & VVV and this is true in the case of 3-XXX. The solubility class was A1. This is true for 3-XXX which has X carbon atoms. The observed melting point of the amide derivative 139 – 140 oC, is close to the literature value (143 oC). The depression could be due to the slight contamination of compound. The identity of compound “X15” is 3-XXX.

Suggest Documents