Chapter Forty One - Part One This chapter will be split down into 3 separate parts (much like I did with the chapter on fluoride). This is for the simple reason that it contains too much information for just one. The first part will look at many of the commonly held assumptions and beliefs of modern medicine in regards to both the causes and also the “treatment” of cancer. The second part will offer an alternative hypothesis or reason for the real cause of cancer that was suggested by the work of an incredible (yet almost forgotten) individual who was, believe it or not, curing cancer with a 100% success rate over 70 years ago! The third and final part will show you some other methods for curing cancer (that actually work‖ without involving any of the “big three” methods that are employed by all of today’s so called “experts”, namely: 1. Chopping bits out of you - (surgery). 2. Poisoning you - (chemotherapy). 3. Nuking you - (radiotherapy). I believe that cancer is a man-made phenomenon, and you might well remember that this theory was also suggested by other people during the course of this work: - In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person." W.B. Clarke's important observation that cancer was not found in unvaccinated individual’s demands an explanation and one now appears forthcoming. All vaccines given over a short period of time to an immature immune system deplete the thymus gland (the primary gland involved in immune reactions) of irreplaceable immature immune cells. Each of these cells could have multiplied and developed into an army of valuable cells to combat infection and growth of abnormal cells. When these immune cells have been used up, permanent immunity may not appear. The Arthur Research Foundation in Tucson, Arizona estimates that up to 60 % of our immune system may be exhausted by multiple mass vaccines (36 are now required for children). Only 10 % of immune cells are permanently lost when a child is permitted to develop natural immunity from disease. There needs to be grave concern about these immune system injuring vaccinations! Could the persons who approve these mass vaccinations know that they are impairing the health of these children, many of whom are being doomed to requiring much medical care in the future? (My Note. YES!!!!) Compelling evidence is available that the development of the immune system after contracting the usual childhood diseases matures and renders it capable to fight infection and malignant cells in the future. Cancer was a very rare illness in the 1890's. This evidence about immune system injury from vaccinating affords a plausible explanation for Dr. Clarke's finding that only vaccinated individuals got cancer. Some radical adverse change in health occurred in the early 1900s to permit cancer to explode and vaccinating appears to be the reason. From the article “Why You Should Avoid Taking Vaccines” By Dr. James Howenstine, MD ―from the flu chapter earlier in this work). I wholeheartedly concur with this belief. In fact, I personally think that vaccines are the biggest causes of cancer in the “Western World” in that they devastate our immune system leaving us open to attack from things that our immune system could easily have dealt with in the past. I hope that I can prove this to you during this chapter and also the one on AIDS.

Cancer caused by modern man as it was virtually non-existent in ancient world Cancer is a modern man-made disease caused by the excesses of modern life, a new study suggests. By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent 14 Oct 2010 The Telegraph Researchers looking at almost a thousand mummies from ancient Egypt and South America found only a handful suffered from cancer when now it accounts for nearly one in three deaths. The findings suggest that it is modern lifestyles and pollution levels caused by industry that are the main cause of the disease and that it is not a naturally occurring condition. The study showed the disease rate has risen dramatically since the Industrial Revolution, in particular childhood cancer – proving that the rise is not simply due to people living longer. Now it is hoped that it could lead to better understanding of the origins of cancer and to new treatments for the disease which claims more than 150,000 lives a year in the UK alone. “In industrialised societies, cancer is second only to cardiovascular disease as a cause of death," said Professor Rosalie David, a biomedical Egyptologist at the University of Manchester. "But in ancient times, it was extremely rare. There is nothing in the natural environment that can cause cancer. So it has to be a man-made disease, down to pollution and changes to our diet and lifestyle. "Cancer appears to be a modern disease created by modern life." To trace the origins of cancer, Prof David and colleague Professor Michael Zimmerman, looked for evidence of the disease in hundreds of mummified bodies dating back up to 3,000 years and also in fossils and ancient medical texts. Despite tried and tested techniques of viewing rehydrated tissue under the microscope they found that only five cases of tumours, most of which were benign. Fossil evidence of cancer is also sparse, with scientific literature providing a few dozen, mostly disputed, examples in animal and Neanderthal bones, the study in journal Nature Reviews Cancer reports. They did find examples of other modern day aged related diseases such as hardening of the arteries and arthritis, which they said dismissed the argument that ancient humans did not live long enough to develop cancer. The mummified bodies from both rich and poor backgrounds showed that the average life expectancy ranged from 25 to 50, depending on their background. Evidence of cancer in ancient Egyptian texts is also "tenuous", the researchers claimed, with cancer-like problems more likely to have been caused by leprosy or even varicose veins. The only diagnosis of cancer was a case in an unnamed mummy, an "ordinary" person who had lived around 200AD. Modern records show that the disease rate has risen massively since the Industrial Revolution, in particular childhood cancer. Prof Zimmerman said: “In an ancient society lacking surgical intervention, evidence of cancer should remain in all cases.

"The virtual absence of malignancies in mummies must be interpreted as indicating their rarity in antiquity, indicating that cancer causing factors are limited to societies affected by modern industrialisation.” Dr. Zimmerman dismissed arguments that tumours may have disintegrated over time. His experimental studies indicated that if anything they are better preserved than normal tissues. As the team moved through the ages, it was not until the 17th century that they found descriptions of breast and other cancers. Scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps occurred in 1775, nasal cancer in snuff users in 1761 and Hodgkin’s disease in 1832. Prof David said: “Where there are cases of cancer in ancient Egyptian remains, we are not sure what caused them. "They did heat their homes with fires, which gave off smoke, and temples burned incense, but sometimes illnesses are just thrown up.” “Yet again extensive ancient Egyptian data, along with other data from across the millennia, has given modern society a clear message – cancer is man-made and something that we can and should address.” Dr Rachel Thompson, of World Cancer Research Fund, said the research was "very interesting". "About one in three people in the UK will get cancer so it is fairly commonplace in the modern world. "Scientists now say a healthy diet, regular physical activity and maintaining a healthy weight can prevent about a third of the most common cancers so perhaps our ancestors’ lifestyle reduced their risk from cancer." But Jessica Harris, senior health information officer at Cancer Research UK, said it was wrong to suggest that cancer was purely man-made. “It can be tempting to worry about our cancer risk from external things like pollution and chemicals more than from things we can control, like our lifestyles," she said. 19 Ways Cancer Becomes the Ultimate Soft-Kill Operation Paul Adams, J.D.Activist Post Tuesday, July 17, 2012 In earlier times it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people then to control a million people. Zbigniew Brzezinski (Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Carter/Obama Advisor). The cancer epidemic is a soft-kill operation and a move by the world’s so-called elites to cull the human population. It is well documented that the Club of Rome, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, the Rockefellers, Warren Buffet and many other globalists plan to dominate and decimate humanity with their population reduction agenda. As we will see, the globalists first cause the cancer and then provide us with their ineffective treatments (not cures) for profit. This method is known as Problem – Reaction – Solution. According to the American Cancer Society, 1,638,910 new cancer cases will arise in the United States during 2012. Approximately 577,190 American cancer patients are expected to die from their cancer this year as well. One in every two men will suffer from cancer (one

in four will die) as will one in every three women (one in five will die). According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, cancer is the second leading cause of death, closely trailing heart disease. In 1971, President Nixon and Congress declared war on cancer. Since then, the federal government has spent well over $105 billion to battle cancer. In 2010 alone, the National Cancer Institute had a budget of $6.4 billion. As of March 2011, the Susan B. Komen Foundation, allegedly leading the fight against breast cancer, had