Challenges for IPP Promotion in the Indian Power Sector

Challenges for IPP Promotion in the Indian Power Sector February 4 - 5, 2008 India – Japan Energy Forum Seigo MIZUNUMA Executive Managing Officer, D...
Author: Douglas Baker
0 downloads 2 Views 4MB Size
Challenges for IPP Promotion in the Indian Power Sector

February 4 - 5, 2008

India – Japan Energy Forum Seigo MIZUNUMA Executive Managing Officer, Department Director International Power Business Dept.

J-POWER 1

C o n t e n t s Expanding relationship between India and Japan

     

. Track Record in the Indian Power Sector Cooperation in the Indian Power Sector between India and Japan Business model in the power sector

2

Expanding relationship between India and Japan



Joint statement by Japan government and India government ( 22.8.2007) - Launch immediate to negotiation for the conclusion of EPA - Development of infrastructure and Promotion of Manufacturing, Trade and Investment ( Promotion participation of Japanese companies in India power sector) - Human Resource Development for Promotion of Manufacturing India is the top country to receive Japan’s ODA loan. (1.5bil USD ; 2008)

 

Japanese auto companies have rapid expansion program to establish huge auto factories in India. ;Suzuki Co. Ltd, Honda Co. Ltd, Toyota Co. Ltd, Nissan Co. Ltd

3

. Track Record in the Indian Power Sector



Recent developments in Japanese manufacturer’s activities in India power sector - TOSHIBA got order of Turbine & Generator (5 800MW) in



Mundra Ultra Mega Project. - Mitsubishi Group instituted Joint company of Turbine & Generator with L&T in India.



J-POWER continues power consulting business in India.

4

. Track Record in the Indian Power Sector Track Record of Consulting Business by J-POWER in India (1)



No

Name of Project

Services

Country

Client

Object

Description for the Project Type of Power Plant

Installed Capacity

Duration of Services

T-1

Anpara “B” CoalFired Thermal Power Plant

Definite Design Supervision

India

UPSEB

Power Generation

Coal-Fired

500 MW × 2

Sep. 1985 – Dec. 1993

T-2

Assam Gas Turbine Power Station

Definite Design, Construction Supervision

India

NEEPCO

Power Generation and Transmissi on Line

Gas Turbine

Total 300 MW

Jun. 1990 – Dec. 1992

T-3

Kotadadem Thermal Power Rehabilitation

Engineering & Performance test

India

APSEB

Power Generation

Coal-Fired

T-4

Bakreshwar CoalFired Thermal Power Station Unit No. 1 to 3

FS, Basic/Definite Design, Construction Supervision

India

West Bengal Power Development Corporation

Power Generation

Coal-Fired

210 MW × 3

Feb. 1995 – Aug. 2000

T-4

Anpara “B” CoalFired Thermal Power Plant – Ash Utilization

FS, Specification/Engine ering for Ash Utilization System (with DESEIN)

India

UPSEB

Power Generation

Coal-Fired

500 MW × 2 – Ash reused/utilization plant

May. 2000 – Jul. 2000

T-6

Sipat Coal-Fired Thermal Power Station (SC)

FS, Basic Design & Engineering support

India/Madhy a Pradesh State

NTPC

Power Generation

Coal-Fired/SC, 24.1MSP, 538/566°C

660 MW x 3

Aug. 1998 – Aug. 1999, Feb. 2000 – Dec. 2000

T-7

Bakreshwar CoalFired Thermal Power Station Unit No. 4 & 5

FS, Basic/Definite

India

West Bengal Power Development Corporation

Power Generation

Coal-Fired

210 MW × 1

Sep. 1999 – Jan. 2000

T-8

Bakreshwar CoalFired Thermal Power Station Unit No. 4 & 5 (under construction)

Definite Design, Construction Supervision

India

WBPDC

Power Generation

Coal-Fired

210 MW × 1

Mar. 2003 – Oct. 2007

T-9

Bakreshwar CoalFired Thermal Power Station Unit No. 6

FS

India

WBPDC

Power Generation

Coal-Fired/SC, 24.1MSP, 538/566°C

500 MW × 1

Aug. 2005 – Feb. 2006

T-10

Neemrana and Haldia Industrial Estates Thermal Power Plant

FS

India

JETRO / METI

Power Generation

-Coal Fired -Gas Fired (Captive)

600 MW × 2 23 or 60 MW × 1

Nov. 2006 – Feb. 2007

Jun. 1996 – Apr. 1996

5

. Track Record in the Indian Power Sector Track Record of Consulting Business by J-POWER in India (2)



No

Name of Project

Services

Country

Client

Object

Description for the Project

Duration of Services

H-1

Srisailam Left Bank

Definite Design, Construction Supervision

India/Andhr a Pradesh State

Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (APSEB)

Power Generation

Hydro

H-2

Srisailam Transmission

Definite Design, Construction Supervision

India/Andhr a Pradesh State

Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (APSEB)

Transmission

Transmission

H-3

Maharashutra Pump up Project

FS

India

MSSEB

Power Generation

Hydro

Sep. 1994 – Nov. 1994

H-4

Gatogarl Pump up Project

FS

India

GOMID

Power Generation

Hydro

Jan. 1996 – Jul. 1999

H-5

West Bengal Transmission System

Definite Design, Construction Supervision

India/West Bengal State

West Bengal State Electricity Board (WBSEB)

Transmission

Transmission

Jul. 1997 – Jun. 2000

H-6

Umiyam Hydro Project

Construction Supervision

India

Megaraya

Hydro

Oct. 1998 – Sep. 2000

H-7

Hydro Power Station Rehabilitation

FS

India

APGENCO, etc.

Power Generation

Hydro

Sep. 2001 – Mar. 2002

H-8

Purulia Hydro Power (under construction)

Basic/Definite Design, Construction Supervision

India/West Bengal State

West Bengal State Electricity Board (WBSEB)

Power Generation

Hydro

900 MW

Aug. 1990 – Dec. 1992, Oct. 1995 – Feb. 2008

H-9

Ghatghar Hydro Power (under construction)

Special Assistance, Construction Supervision

India

Government of Maharashtra Irrigation Department

Power Generation

Hydro

200 MW

Nov. 1994 – Jan. 1995, Oct. 1995 – on going

900 MW

Dec. 1988 – on going

Apr. 1994 – on going

6

. Track Record in the Indian Power Sector BAKRESWAR Thermal Power Plant



1. Project Outline • Project Site: Bakreswar in West Bengal (260km northwest far from Kolkata) With consulting services by J-POWER, West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited (WBPDCL) has driven their development plans, and presently owns and operates 3 x 210 MW units (Unit No.1, 2 & 3) at their Bakreswar Thermal Power Plant located in northwest part of West Bengal state and 2 x 210 MW (Unit No.4 & 5) additional units are under implementation. The Unit No.1, 2 & 3 were financed by Japanese ODA loan and the additional units No.4 & 5 are also financed by Japanese ODA loan. 2.

Scope of Service • DPR, D/D,Tender Evaluation ,Construction Super vision (review)

3.

Current Situation • COD: Unit.1) Nov. 2000 / Unit.2) Apr.2001 / Unit.3) Oct.2001 / Unit.4) July.2007/ Unit.5) Oct. 2007

 

7

. Track Record in the Indian Power Sector



PULURIA Hydro Pumped Storage Power Plant 1. Project Outline



Project Site: Puluria in West Bengal (50 km from Jamshedpur ) The Purulia Pumped Storage Power Station owned by WSEDCL will contribute to more efficient operations of the electric power system, whose primary power source (over 90 percent) is coal-fired thermal power, and will supply electricity during evening peak hours. Funded by Japanese government ODA initiatives, the power station, when completed, will deliver maximum power of 900 MW with four units supplying 225 MW each.

2.Scope of Service • DPR,D/D,Tender Evaluation ,Construction Super vision 3.Current Situation (Commissioning) • Unit 1) Jan. 2008 Unit 2) Nov.2007 Unit 3) Aug.2007 Unit



  

4) July. 2007

4. Main Equipment & Civil Construction Civil Contractor: Taisei Co., Ltd. Main Equipment (Turbine) Type : Francis Manufacture: Toshiba Co., Ltd. 8

Cooperation in the Indian Power Sector between India and Japan



Cooperation in huge power Infrastructure development that keeps sustainable economic growth

 

To support Japanese manufacture’s business expansion in India through power development To support improvement of energy efficiency in the Indian Power Sector

- In ASIA-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP (APP) at Japan in 2007, Takasago coal fired power plant (COD:1968) still keeping high efficiency impressed on participant in APP



To support environment issue solution (air pollution/ global warming)

9

Business model in the power sector



(1) Technology, business know-how, monetary fund from the Japan side (2) General concern regarding investment in the Indian power sector (3) Business model in collaboration with both Indian and Japanese public sectors

10

Business model in the power sector



(1) Technology, business know-how, monetary fund from the Japan side

Advanced technologies of development and operation of high efficient Power Station reducing environment impact

     

- High efficiency generation technology (USC) - DeSOx technology - DeNOx technology - Dust removal technology

Improvement of efficiency of exiting old power plant Know how of management control and efficiency provided by Japanese private power companies

Providing ODA loan and Investment loan by Japanese public sector (JBIC) 11

Business model in the power sector



(1) Technology, business know-how, monetary fund from the Japan side Isogo New#1 Ultra Super Critical (USC) Coal fired power plant - 25MPa, 600/610 deg. C - Air Emission regulation (SOX: 20ppm, NOX: 20ppm, TSP:10mg/Nm3 - Gross efficiency : 45% (LHV base) Compared with exiting old power plant in India (gross efficiency 30% LHV base), technology of USC can reduce 33% about CO2 emission and coal consumption.



12

Business model in the power sector



(2) General concern regarding investment in the India power sector

Prospective change in financial improvement of SEC

 

Current data and statistic trends are not likely to prove realization of financial improvement of State Electricity Companies.

Open policy of power transaction in India 1) EA Act and UMPP scheme provide following schemes. - Multilateral Power Purchase are allowable - Bank LC, Escrow Reserve provided by PPA scheme of UMPP 2) However, There are still concerns raised by foreign power developers - Payment Security has not been confirmed as real function scheme. - In the event of PPA default by State Electricity Company, foreign power developers have less power to resume tariff recovery mechanism timely and quickly than local IPP developer. - To promote foreign investment in the Indian power sector, dialog among both governments is expected. 13

Business model in the power sector

 



















Vietnam Tokyo Electric & Sumitomo Kyushu Electric & Sojitz Sumitomo











Philippines J-Power & Sumitomo Marubeni Tokyo Electric Kansai Electric Tokyo Electric & Kyushu Electric & Marubeni & Mitsubishi











Indonesia Marubeni Tokyo Electric& Mitsui Toyota Tomen 

India Marubeni



Taiwan J-Power& Sojitz Tokyo Electric & Sumitomo



Thailand J-Power Kansai Electric Chubu Electric & Toyota Marubeni





Korea Marubeni



China J-Power& Sojitz Marubeni



IPP track record in Asia by Japanese companies

14







  



  



















  

 









 

 





  





 

 

 













  



 





 





 

!



 



" #

$











 

 &



$







 

&

 %

 





 %

#





#











()

,



'

 

 &

!

 *

 +





 



#









#

! 











!

 



.







 



 

 &



!

 %



#







#

! 







)

(



!

 









 



 

 &



!

 %



#



 



  



 

# 



)

)

%/

%





1!

 0

*













 

 %

23+

 &



 

#

4





0  



&







(





  



 

 &



 

#

 



&





6

!



'5

 &





%

/

 *



'





!

 & 



  Business model in the power sector

IPP track record in Asia by Japanese companies(1)

15



&





$7



 %

2 + 3

# 







 





 

'

!

'

0







! 



 



'

0

'

!



! 







 



 

  

# 



# 



-







0



 %







8



 

!

0





!



 

'

!

'

0





0



! 







 



 

# 





 8



 

'

!

'

0

5

9





7



8

&



 %

2 + 3



#







5

%







5









$

 

(















'

!  

  



















 

 

#

 



5

5

%

 

'

 

!

  









#



5

%

5











 

!

  



#

9



)

 



;

 :



 0

#



5

%

5 #

(



(

0



! 















 



 

 & 



5

%

5



)

7





! 







 



 

 & 









 

 %

#



5

%





# 

#

! 





  



 

 

!

  

  

#

5









(



! 











 



 

# 



 *

#



5

%





6

!



'5

 &





%

/

 *



'





!

 & 



  Business model in the power sector

IPP track record in Asia by Japanese companies(2)

16

!



'





7



0 !

'



 

'





< 

1!

 0

* 

 

!

 

 



'

0

'

!



! 



-



 



 

# 

# 

#

(

7



=  >



%  



)



'

7

'

%  

!



!



< 

< 

 

 %

2 + 3

#

#'

8 



 

 

 

 %

2 + 3

# 

$

(

%

?







 



 

 





 







()

(

 

 %

2 + 3

# 















  



 



 





(

(

 

 %

2 + 3

# 

'

 



5!

'

 0



 



 





 

 %

2 + 3

#

#'

8 

#

#'

8 



(

(

 

 %

2 + 3

# 



/



  







!





 



 



 :



 



 







!





7

 

 %

2 + 3

# 

#









  5



 



 





$

(

 

 %

2 + 3

# 





@



 %



 



 







(



 %

2 + 3 



@



# 











 



 











 

# 





)

 8



 8



 



 









(





 

!

  



#

 

# 





 :



 



 



!



 

 !





(

9



! 



-

    





&  

# 





 



 







6

!



'5

 &





%

/

 *



'





!

 & 



 Business model in the power sector

IPP track record in Asia by Japanese companies(3)

17

Business model in the power sector



(3) Business model in collaboration with public sectors To mitigate risk concerns raised, we have been promoting studies on several business model.

   

Captive power Pumped-storage power generation Biomass power Retrofit of existing old power plant 18

Business model in the power sector



(3) Business model in collaboration with public sectors Captive

power



Many Japanese factories in India demand high quality electricity of stabile frequency and no black-out.



We studied captive power business possibility at industrial estates in India in 2006. We found followings requirements. (1) Sufficient gas supply (2) Appropriate amount of electric demand in industrial estates (3) The exemption of legal restriction for captive power The exemption of the requirements of minimum 26% investment and 51% electricity consumption in relation to Group captive power projects



We are exploring possibilities for two approaches which are based on captive power plants. 19

Business model in the power sector



(3) Business model in collaboration with public sectors Captive power model (case

)



Small / Middle Gas Power Plant

Private Partnership Loan

Public Public Sector Sector

(Fuel (Fuel Supply Supply and and Transportation Transportation SPC) SPC) Fuel (gas) • Development of gas source • Development of fuel transportation • Provision of dedicated line

Local /Japanese Local/Japanese Developer Developer IPP IPP

PFC PFC Local Local

Investment

Japanese Japanese developer developer

(Dedicated Line) (PPA) A A

B B

C C

Industrial Zones

20

Business model in the power sector



(3) Business model in collaboration with public sectors Captive power model (case2) Large Gas Power Plant

Private Partnership Loan

Public Public Sector Sector

(Fuel (Fuel Supply Supply and and Transportation Transportation SPC) SPC) Fuel (gas)

Local /Japanese Local/Japanese developer developer IPP IPP

PFC PFC

Investment

Local Local Japanese Japanese Developer Developer

• Development of gas source

PTC PTC

(Power (Power Trader) Trader)

State State Government Government

Industrial Zones

A A

B B

C C

State Distribution Companies

A A

B B

C C

Special Preferable Distribution Guarantee

21

Business model in the power sector



(3) Business model in collaboration with public sectors Pumped-storage power generation Benefit of pumped-storage power generation (1) Stability of power grid system (2) Higher efficiency of Grid System



Private loan / Investment

ODA loan

IPP IPP Public Public Sector Sector Electric Electric /Mechanical /Mechanical Civil Civil Portion Portion Portion Portion Construction

Joint Joint Company Company IPP IPP & & Public Public Sector Sector

PPA with PTC

National National Grid Grid

State State Grid Grid

Operation

22

Business model in the power sector



(3) Business model in collaboration with public sectors Biomass power

  

Bagasse, Rice husk, Wood Chip, Jatropha are abundant non fossil fuel in India. Using non fossil fuel above, large scale development of biomass power project (10MW ) in India are expected.



Development of biomass power project is beneficial to both India and Japan.

Since India heavily depends on fossil fuel, biomass power project directly and efficiently contributes to reduction of carbon dioxide emission. Japan needs emission trading to achieve target goal of emission reduction set by Kyoto Protocol. (6% reduction compared with emission level in 1990). India is top country to provide CDM to developed countries as a host country of CDM.

 

More than 50 projects in India were approved as CDM project by UN.

23

Business model in the power sector



(3) Business model in collaboration with public sectors Biomass

Agriculture Agriculture Sector Sector

Fuel

power

Electricity

IPP IPP company company

Biomass fuel collection and supply

State State electric electric company company

Support

Public partnership

CDM

Japanese Japanese sponsor sponsor

State State government government Tariff intensive Tax exemption - Mandatory purchase of generated electricity



24

Business model in the power sector



(3) Business model in collaboration with public sectors Retrofit of existing old power plant Improvement of efficiency - Reduction of Fuel consumption - Reduction of carbon dioxide

IPP IPP developer developer Investment

Existing Existing old old power power plant plant

Retrofit / Rehabilitation

Renewal Renewal Power Power Plant Plant

CDM

Japanese Japanese sponsor sponsor

PPA

PTC PTC Power Power trader trader

25

Suggest Documents