CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2016 – 2020   Greenville Water Capital Improvement Program 2016 – 2020 Phillip A. Kilgore Chairman James W. Banniste...
4 downloads 3 Views 3MB Size
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2016 – 2020

 

Greenville Water

Capital Improvement Program 2016 – 2020

Phillip A. Kilgore Chairman

James W. Bannister Vice Chairman

Deb Sofield Commissioner

Knox H. White Mayor-Ex-Officio

J. David Sudduth Commissioner-Ex-Officio

David H. Bereskin Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 SUMMARY SCHEDULES Project Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Project Summary by Type…………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Project Summary by Funding Source………………………………………………………………………….. 15 Summary of Additional Operating Impacts………………………………………………………………… 16 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS General Central Campus Improvements………………………………………………………………………………… 17 SCADA Study………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18 New Bill Inserter………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 19 FIS Project……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………20 Water Resources Master Plan……………………………………………………………………………………. 21 Residence at Trammel Gap……………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 Remodel Table Rock Caretaker House………………………………………………………………………. 23 Imaging System………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 24 Update Emergency Response Plan……………………………………………………………………………. 25 Arc Flash Compliance/Study………………………………………………………………………………………. 26 Comprehensive Asset Management Program…………………………………………………………… 27 Administrative Building Renovations………………………………………………………………………… 28 System Wide Security Master Plan……………………………………………………………………………. 29 Data Warehouse……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 30 Intake North Saluda Intake Structure - Rehab………………………………………………………………………. Gayley PS Portable Generator Connection…………………………………………………………………. Dredge Channel at North Saluda Intake and Outlet Bldg…………………………………………… North Saluda Treating Station – Rehab………………………………………………………………………. Table Rock Treating Station – Rehab…………………………………………………………………………..

31 32 33 34 35

Valves Rutherford Rd – Check Valves……………………………………………………………………………………. 36 FCV Flow and Pressure Monitoring Improvements……………………………………………………. 37 Remote Monitoring for PRVs……………………………………………………………………………………… 38 Pumping Cliffs Valley/Upper Paris Mtn. PS Upgrade………………………………………………………………… 39 Crestwood PS – Increase Pump Size…………………………………………………………………………… 40 Upper White Horse PS – Increase Pump Capacity……………………………………………………… 41

Storage Paris Mountain/Lake Circle Storage Tank – Repaint Tank………………………………………….. Repaint Wham Tank…………………………………………………………………………………………………… Hillandale - New Storage Tank…………………………………………………………………………………… Goodwin Bridge Reservoir - Additional Storage…………………………………………………………

42 43 44 45

Treatment Clearwell Dehumidifiers……………………………………………………………………………………………. 46 Alkalinity Improvements at WTPs…………………………………………………………………………….. 47 Stovall WTP - Redundant Transformer…………………………………………………………………….. 48 Stovall WTP - New Roof…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49 Sludge Removal at WTPs…………………………………………………………………………………………… 50 Residuals Handling Study and Permitting………………………………………………………………….. 51 Replace Lab Floors at Stovall WTP…………………………………………………………………………….. 52 Fume Hood Replacement at Stovall WTP Lab…………………………………………………………… 53 Adkins WTP – Basin Rehab and Painting…………………………………………………………………… 54 Adkins WTP – Filter Gallery Rehab……………………………………………………………………………. 55 Stovall WTP – Painting……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 56 Reservoirs Dam Improvements at Table Rock and North Saluda……………………………………………….. 57 Mains Piney Mountain Rd. #1 – New Main………………………………………………………………………….. 58 Aiken Chapel Rd. – New Water Main………………………………………………………………………… 59 N. Pleasantburg Rd. – Parallel Water Main……………………………………………………………….. 60 Rutherford Rd. – New Water Main……………………………………………………………………………. 61 Highway 276 – New Water Main……………………………………………………………………………….. 62 SE Main St. – New Water Main………………………………………………………………………………….. 63 Main St. – Replace 24-in Main…………………………………………………………………………………… 64 Pineforest Dr. – New Water Main……………………………………………………………………………… 65 Pelham Commons Blvd. – New Water Main…………………………………………………………….. 66 S Parker Rd. – Replacement Water Main………………………………………………………………….. 67 S Buckhorn Rd. – Replacement Water Main…………………………………………………………….. 68 Tally Bridge Rd. – New Water Main…………………………………………………………………………... 69 Bates Crossing Rd. – New Water Main……………………………………………………………………… 70 Moore Rd. – Replacement Water Main……………………………………………………………………… 71 Old White Horse Rd. – Replacement Main……………………………………………………………….. 72 Goodwin Bridge Rd. – New Water Main……………………………………………………………………. 73 Wellborn Rd. to Saluda River – Inspect 72-in Trans Main………………………………………… 74

 

Introduction

2016-2 20 CAPIITAL IMP PROVEM MENT PROGRA AM INTRO ODUCTIO ON The Cap pital Improve ement Progrram (CIP) is s a five-yea ar fiscal plan nning tool u used to iden ntify the future ca apital needs of Greenvillle Water, as well as id dentify the ti ming and m method of fin nancing those ca apital needs s. Generally, projects included in the CIP a are non-recu urring projeccts that exceed $100,000 $ in cost and ha ave a usefull life of at le east five yea ars. The sig gnificant cosst of the projects included in the t CIP may y also require e the use of debt or rese erves to finance their cost. Normal System S Imp provements and Routine e Annual Ad dditions & R Replacemen nts are inclu uded as part of th he Annual Operating O Bu udget rather than the CIIP. This is b because the ese types off capital needs arre funded with w current revenues r ge enerated by our rates a and the fund ding level fo or these recurring g capital nee eds is steady y and consta ant from yea ar to year. Normal Sysstem Improvvements include the t City CIP P, Water Lin ne Replacem ment Progra am, Highwa ay Improvem ments, and System Additions s & Extensio ons. Routine e Annual Ad dditions and Replaceme ents are generally purchases of new or re eplacement vehicles, eq quipment and d meters. The capiital budget is adopted annually, a enc compassing g appropriations for the projects sch heduled for the first year of o the plan, and authorizing anyy bond issu ues necessa ary to fund d these ments. The e subsequen nt four yearrs are consiidered plann ning years and are sub bject to improvem annual appropriation a n. The Five-Year Finan ncial Foreca st is used in n the develo opment of th he CIP, and the financing pla an for the CIP C has bee en shaped b by the availa ability of funds projected d in the forecast. New Fac cilities Mastter Plan In 2015, Black & Veatch comp pleted a com mprehensive e and long‐rrange Water System F Facilities P and Capital Improve ements Prog gram. The p planning pro ocess encom mpassed all a aspects Master Plan of the wa ater treatment and distriibution syste em. The ove erall goal wa as to create a 25‐year C CIP and provide a phased approach for th he implemen ntation of reccommended d improveme ents. Asset ins spections off intake, trea atment, pum mping, and sstorage facilities as well as controll valves were con nducted to determine d co ondition and need for re epair/replace ement of asssets through hout the system. In addition to the inspe ections at the e treatment facilities, an n evaluation of the perfo ormance of the tre eatment facilities from a water w quality y and operattional standp point was co ompleted. An all-pipes hydraulic model was w developed to includ de each acttive water m main (0.5 in nch and greater) that t is includ ded in the Greenville Wa ater GIS. Th he all-pipes model was u utilized for a master planning level analys sis to assess overall sys stem perform mance and identify specific projectss based on capac city and pres ssure deficie encies in the distribution system.

1

The mas ster planning g effort invo olved popula ation and de emand proje ections throu ugh 2040. W While the residential population within the Greenville Water se ervice area has been stteadily increasing des, residen ntial customer water use has been n flat in rece ent years. T The driving force for decad behind th his trend is due d to the fa act that per capita use has been trrending dow wnward for o over a decade. Declining per capita a trends can be attrib uted to a variety of ffactors inclu uding decreasing average e household d size, use of high effficiency plu umbing fixtu ures and in ndoor appliance es, increase ed conservattion as well as a economicc conditionss. Future wa ater requirem ments were esttimated base ed on expec cted per cap pita residenttial use and probable fu uture comme ercial and indu ustrial use. The sustain ned pattern of declining g per‐capita a water use e is projecte ed to continue into the futu ure before leveling out affter 20 yearss at 45 gpcd.    

                                                                         



 

2

The evaluation of tre eatment facillities determ mined that bo oth the Stova all WTP and the Adkins WTP consisten ntly meet water w quality goals and the level off service de esired for each facility. The following shows the maximum day d demand d projectionss along with h the combin ned capacities of nts. Since prrojected max ximum day demands ca an be handle ed within exxisting capaccities, both plan planning for future tre eatment cap pacity was no ot recomme nded.  

                                                                   

 

The Stov vall WTP is rated for 75 5 million galllons per dayy (MGD) and is capable e of that flow w. Minor modifications m to the che emical feed system to include increased ca apacity of th he phosphate feed pumps were recommended. The most recent pum mping improv vements at the Adkins W WTP position ned the plantt for a re‐ratiing to D. Some tre eatment processes are only capab ble of 60 M MGD and w would need tto be 90 MGD upgraded d, to include;  

 

An A evaluation n of the sedim mentation prrocess relati ng to the de etention time e. Minor M modific cations to th he chemical feed system m to include e increased capacity of the post‐sodium hydroxide fe eed pumps, a larger sod dium hydroxxide day tank, and a larrger phosphate mixing tank.

3



Additional pumping capacity for the raw and intermediate transfer pumps. available for the additional pumps needed to reach 90 MGD.

Space is

With an updated and calibrated, hydraulic model, it was possible to evaluate the capacities of components in the distribution system through 2040 based on population and flow projections. The evaluation of the distribution system determined that overall it is in very good condition. There are pumping, storage and pressure improvements that were identified. The following pump stations will need capacity upgrades by 2040:   

Cliffs Valley PS (another PS is currently undergoing design). Crestwood PS is deficient in pumping capacity by 1.75 MGD. Paris Mountain PS (another PS is currently undergoing design).

The following reservoirs do not have sufficient capacity through 2040:  

Altamont & Hillandale Reservoirs, combined, are deficient in storage by 1.5 million gallons (MG). Goodwin Bridge Reservoir is deficient in storage by 0.5 MG.

Additionally, the Master Plan noted that the following components may become deficient during the planning period and require a large capital investment:  

Reservoir No. 3 Tank 1 replacement due to age and construction materials. Roper Mountain Reservoir Tank 1 monitoring and evaluation due to deflection of the roof.

The pressure zones are recommended to have increased fire flow by 2040.   PRESSURE ZONE 

DESIRED FIRE  FLOW (GPM)

DURATION  (HOURS)

AVAILABLE FIRE  FLOW (GPM)

%  DEFICIENCY 

Blue Bonnet 

2,250 

2

700

69% 

Cliffs Valley 

2,250 

2

1,200

47% 

Mountain Park 

2,250 

2

2,000

11% 

Paris Mountain 

2,250 

2

2,000

11% 

Upper Paris Mountain 

1,000 



1,000 

0% 

  Also, recommendations were made for system monitoring and SCADA improvements, to include:   

 

Flow meters at control valves, namely the Green Avenue and J.L. Mann valves. Flow and pressure monitoring at pressure reducing valves (PRVs). Pressure transmitters at critical low and high pressures locations in each pressure zone.

4

The Facilities Master Plan recommended that Greenville Water continue with a steady investment program targeting the highest priority pipes for replacement, with an approximate investment rate of $4.0 million per year to replace aging and deteriorating infrastructure. Using planned replacement budgets and asset management scores for each pipe, pipes were identified and prioritized for replacement over the planning horizon. Strategic Planning and the CIP The Operational Excellence focus area of our Strategic Plan places an emphasis on the implementation of technology to improve operational performance and efficiency. The inclusion of technology projects in the 2016-20 CIP reflects this emphasis. Specifically, the Document Imaging and Data Warehouse projects, the Comprehensive Asset Management Program and the ongoing Financial Information Systems projects are investments that will more fully integrate technology and automation into our workflows and business processes. Information will be available real time or near real time across the organization to improve customer service and to provide access for employees deployed in the field with available mobile technology. A Comprehensive Asset Management Program can optimize infrastructure life cycle costs and also provide data that will assist the organization in prioritizing future operating and capital expenditures. Phase I of the project will involve an organizational capacity assessment to assess current maintenance management practices as well as an evaluation of the staff and organization needs to properly and fully implement and utilize a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). Long Term Viability is a new focus area in the Strategic Plan. The second phase of the Water Resources Master Plan project continues our efforts to ensure that we have a secure long-term water supply to meet the demands of our growing service area. Phase I of the Plan is complete and involved projections of population and future water requirements, safe yield studies and reservoir optimization, an assessment of the Broad River basin water resource and the development of a Saluda River basin model. The work done in Phase I established that Greenville Water has sufficient water resources to meet projected demand with its existing service area through 2100. Phase II will involve an analysis of the Saluda, Broad and Upper Savannah River basins as well Surface Water Withdrawal permits and Lake Keowee permitted withdrawals. Other projects in the CIP that address the Long Term Viability focus area include the update to our Emergency Response Plan and the development of a System Wide Security Master Plan. These projects will address technical and physical security measures to mitigate or reduce risk to staff, data and infrastructure and ensure business and technology continuity.

Changes to the CIP In order to be consistent with the Facilities Master Plan, projects in the CIP have been segregated into the following categories: intakes (raw water intakes and raw water pumping), treatment (including transfer and finished water pumping within the treatment plant), pumping (distribution system), mains, valves (control valves), storage and general.

 

5

R Project Ranking Project re equests hav ve been evaluated against the follow wing criteria:       

Im mproves Wa ater Quality Provides P Cap pacity to Mee et Current orr Future Dem mand Mitigates M Risk to Public Safety S or Health Systematic S Replacement R t of Existing Infrastructurre Im mproves Ope erational Effficiency Coordinates C with w Other Projects P and Requiremen nts Promotes P Eco onomic Dev velopment

oject has bee en reviewed and evaluatted as to how w it meets th he following requiremen nts: Each pro     

Evaluation E crriteria they met m Review R of the e project objectives Priority P assigned to them by the prop posing deparrtment Assessment A of o their urge ency Risks R of deferring projectt`

O and the ex xecutive man nagement te eam have m met with each h departmen nt to go overr their The CEO requests and to bettter understa and their priorities. Fro om this proccess, the CEO provides the sioners a comprehensive recommen ndation on o our most critiical capital n needs. Commiss

 

6

Highlights of the 2016-20 CIP  The 2016-20 CIP totals $47,424,000. 

The 2016-20 CIP includes the use of rate revenue and reserves totaling $28,955,000 and Capacity Fees in the amount of $18,469,000.



The CIP calls for no new bond issues over the five-year period.



The CIP includes the assumption that there will be 3% annual adjustments to retail rates in 2016 and 2017.

Highlights of the 2016 Capital Budget  The capital budget for 2016 is $10,111,500. 

The 2016 Capital Budget includes the use of rate revenue and reserves totaling $7,604,000 and Capacity Fees in the amount of $2,507,000.



Paris Mountain/Lake Circle Storage Tank – Repaint Tank (Year 2) - $79,000





 



Total project request of $379,000 funded over 2 years ($300,000 funded in 2015).



Repaint a 300,000 gallon tank that was last painted in 1978.



Additional funding provided in 2016 to complete the project.

Residence at Trammel Gap (Year 2) - $35,000 

Total project request of $182,500 funded over 2 years ($147,500 funded in 2015).



The current residence at this location is in disrepair and needs to be replaced.



This constructs a new residence to house Watershed personnel to help maintain security on the northern boundary of the North Saluda Watershed.



$20,000 transferred into this project during 2015 from the North Saluda Intake Repairs project.



Additional funding provided in 2016 to tear down old house and barn, and seal well.

Clearwell Dehumidifiers (Year 2) – $305,000 

Total project request of $500,000 funded over 2 years ($195,000 funded in 2015).



Replacement of the dehumidifiers in the basement of the Adkins Treatment Plant to reduce moisture and stop corrosion that is occurring.

7

 





Alkalinity Improvements at Treatment Plants (Year 2) - $2,200,000 

Total project request of $4,905,000 funded over 3 years ($450,000 funded in 2015).



Constructs liquid lime feed and carbon dioxide feed equipment in order to control the alkalinity of the water in the distribution system.



Provides additional buffering capacity to our finished water to reduce finished water pH variations, improves distribution system water quality, limits corrosion potential and mitigates the pricing volatility associated with the use of caustic soda.

Water Resources Master Plan (Year 2) - $550,000 

Total project request of $1,734,000 funded over 3 years ($600,000 funded in 2015).



Develop a plan to meet the growing water supply demands of our system for the next 100 years.



Phase II will involve an analysis of the Saluda, Broad and Upper Savannah River basins as well Surface Water Withdrawal permits and Lake Keowee permitted withdrawals.

Replace Lab Floors at Stovall WTP - $125,000 



Replace original roof on DAF building that was built in 2000. Roof is exhibiting signs of deterioration.

Residuals Handling Study and Permitting - $110,000 

 

Installation of a redundant 225kva 4160 to 480 transformer near the finished water PS.

Stovall WTP – New Roof - $381,000 



Replace original flooring in facility that was built in 2000. Floor has damage and/or significant wear.

Stovall WTP – Redundant Transformers – $212,000 



Additional funding provided in 2016 as required to fully fund this project.

Residuals handling study for both treatment plants. Permitting for land application of residuals at Stovall plant. Evaluate automation of centrifuge operation at Stovall.

8



Arc Flash Compliance/Study - $200,000 



Remodel Table Rock Caretaker House – $305,000 



The current ERP was completed in 2003 and is in need of an overall comprehensive system wide update. The propose scope of work will include an updated threat identification, be it natural or man-made, development of a business and technology continuity plan, and pandemic plan.

Dam Improvements at Table Rock and North Saluda - $150,000 

 

Replaces the existing Documentum imaging system, converts existing data in the system, and indexes all images to accounts. The imaging system serves as a reference filing system for several processes, especially in Engineering and Business Services, operating at a sublayer beneath products like CIS Infinity. Paper items are scanned from paper daily—maps, service orders, contracts, check remittances and other correspondences. These scanned images are important when discussing details with customers regarding their accounts, and its continual operation is vital to the flow of operations in the field regarding tap orders, and contractual concerns with developers. The project also includes replacement of scanning hardware, and includes an effort to integrate existing scanning capabilities into the project.

Update Emergency Response Plan - $200,000 



A complete remodel to address structural issues, and bring the house up to current building code standards. The remodel will also improve energy efficiency and make the structure more habitable for our caretaker. This will be the most substantial renovation of this residence since its construction by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930’s.

Imaging System – $300,000 



Compliance with the OSHA arc flash regulations requires a study which results in a safe work program including classroom training, physical training on the specific equipment involved, and training on the proper use and care of the required personal protective equipment. Arc flash compliance ensures adequate protection of employees from injury from electric components. A safety consultant will be hired to conduct the study and there will be some cost to implement the study recommendations. The consultant will prepare an arc flash PPE report, arc flash diagrams and labels, as well as conduct training sessions.

Address the perched water issue at North Saluda dam identified by 2014 Bunnell Lammons Engineering (BLE) evaluation. Installation of electronic instrumentation to enhance dam operations at both reservoirs. Additional improvements may be needed based on recommendations of geotechnical evaluation by BLE.

9



Piney Mountain Rd #1 – New Water Main - $298,000 



Rutherford Rd – Check Valves - $129,000 





 

Part of the Zone Boundary adjustment from Gravity to Hillandale. Location is N Pleasantburg Dr from Piney Mountain Rd to Rutherford Rd; Parallel to 8-inch.

Sludge Removal at Water Treatment Plants - $1,500,000 



New water main is needed for fire flow capacity (addresses minimum 500 gpm fire flow and cluster area). Location is Aiken Chapel Rd from Riverside Dr to Old Chick Springs Rd.

N Pleasantburg Rd – Parallel Water Main - $931,000 



Add 2 check valves located on pipes 32353 and 26301. Part of the Zone Boundary adjustment from Gravity to Hillandale.

Aiken Chapel Rd – New Water Main - $320,000 



The new water main will maintain looping and service to the southern portion of Hillandale. Location is Piney Mountain Rd from Milian Dr to View Point Dr.

Periodic removal of accumulated sludge at Adkins WTP that is performed every 5-7 years. First time removal of sludge from lagoons that has accumulated at Stovall WTP since the plant was placed in service.

Comprehensive Asset Management Plan (Year 1) - $130,000 

Total project request of $643,000 funded over 2 years.



Develop a comprehensive Asset Management Program. Phase I will consist of an organizational capacity assessment to assess current maintenance management practices including work order generation, asset inventory, preventative maintenance and scheduling. Phase 1 will also include an evaluation of the staff and organization needs to properly and fully implement and utilize a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). Phase 2 is the selection and implementation of a GIS CMMS integrated for all vertical and horizontal assets (plants, pump stations, reservoirs, pipelines, etc.).

Fume Hood Replacement at Stovall WTP Lab (Year 1) - $25,000 

Total project request of $128,000 funded over 2 years.



Project involves having a consultant evaluate the 4 fume hoods in the laboratory to determine if more energy efficient hoods are available. The current hoods are on all the time resulting in very high energy bills. Replacement hoods would be purchased based on consultant's recommendation that will take into account safety regulations, the safety of laboratory staff and minimizing energy usage.

10





Rutherford Rd – New Water Main (Year 1) - $1,026,000 

Total project request of $2,077,000 funded over 2 years.



Part of the Zone Boundary adjustment from Gravity to Hillandale. Also, the connection from the 16-inch transmission line should be moved to the new water main. Location is Rutherford Rd from Waddell Rd to N Pleasantburg; Parallel to 16-inch.

Administrative Building Renovations (Year 1) - $600,000 

Total project request of $1,500,000 funded over 3 years.



Subject to project budget constraints, the following improvements and renovations will be considered: relocate Commission Meeting Room to first level, paint and carpet all interior space, renovate or replace HVAC system, paint wood exterior, power wash and clean aluminum exterior, relocate engineering and remodel training room area on second floor.

 

 

11

 

Summary Schedules

GREENVILLE WATER  2016‐2020 CIP  PROJECT SUMMARY 

PROJECTS  Central Campus Improvements  Cliffs Valley/Upper Paris Mtn. PS Upgrade  SCADA Study  New Bill Inserter FIS Project  Paris Mountain/Lake Circle Storage Tank ‐ Repaint Tank  Residence at Trammel Gap  Clearwell Dehumidifiers Alkalinity Improvements at WTPs  Water Resources Master Plan  North Saluda Intake Structure ‐ Rehab Replace Lab Floors at Stovall WTP  Stovall WTP ‐ Redundant Transformer Stovall WTP ‐ New Roof Residuals Handling Study and Permitting  Arc Flash Compliance/Study Remodel Table Rock Caretaker House Imaging System Update Emergency Response Plan  Dam Improvements at Table Rock and North Saluda  Piney Mountain Rd #1 ‐ New Water Main Rutherford Rd ‐ Check Valves Aiken Chapel Rd ‐ New Water Main N Pleasantburg Rd ‐ Parallel Water Main Sludge Removal at WTPs  Comprehensive Asset Management Program  Fume Hood Replacement at Stovall WTP Lab Rutherford Rd ‐ New Water Main  Administrative Building Renovations  System Wide Security Master Plan Adkins WTP ‐ Basin Rehab and Painting  Adkins WTP ‐ Filter Gallery Rehab Gayley PS Portable Generator Connection Highway 276 ‐ New Water Main Data Warehouse  Hillandale ‐ New Storage Tank Main St ‐ Replace 24‐in Main  Pineforest Dr ‐ New Water Main Repaint Wham Tank  SE Main St ‐ New Water Main North Saluda Treating Station ‐ Rehab Table Rock Treating Station ‐ Rehab Stovall WTP ‐ Painting  Dredge Channel at North Saluda Intake and Outlet Bldg Crestwood PS ‐ Increase Pump Size  Upper White Horse PS ‐ Increase Pump Capacity Goodwin Bridge Reservoir ‐ Additional Storage Pelham Commons Blvd ‐ New Water Main S Parker Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main S Buckhorn Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main Tally Bridge Rd ‐ New Water Main Bates Crossing Rd ‐ New Water Main Remote Monitoring for PRVs FCV Flow and Pressure Monitoring Improvements Wellborn Rd to Saluda River ‐ Inspect 72‐in Trans Main Moore Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main Old White Horse Rd ‐ Replacement Main Goodwin Bridge Rd ‐ New Water Main   TOTAL PROJECTS  FUNDING SOURCES  Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Debt    TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 

  Committed Funding $13,500,000         850,000         150,000         280,000         400,000         300,000         147,500         195,000         450,000         600,000         565,000

Capital  Budget 2016

Planning Years Only  2018 2019 $0 $0

$17,437,500

$10,111,000

       187,000        309,000        543,000        179,000     1,051,000     1,003,000      1,027,000        773,000         793,000        233,000        220,000        151,000     2,086,000     1,333,000         462,000         219,000      1,573,000      1,105,000      1,480,000      1,610,000 $9,397,000 $9,574,000 $9,719,000

$0                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐           79,000           35,000         305,000      4,455,000      1,134,000      1,017,000         125,000         212,000         381,000         110,000         200,000         305,000         300,000         200,000         150,000         298,000         129,000         320,000         931,000      1,500,000         643,000         128,000      2,077,000      1,500,000         103,000         966,000         949,000         435,000      3,768,000         530,000      3,140,000      2,450,000      1,184,000         578,000         125,000         198,000         327,000         573,000         190,000      1,109,000      2,141,000      1,652,000         233,000         220,000         151,000      2,086,000      1,333,000         462,000         219,000      1,573,000      1,105,000      1,480,000      1,610,000 $47,424,000

Total  Project  $13,500,000        850,000        150,000        280,000        400,000        379,000        182,500        500,000     4,905,000     1,734,000     1,582,000        125,000        212,000        381,000        110,000        200,000        305,000        300,000        200,000        150,000        298,000        129,000        320,000        931,000     1,500,000        643,000        128,000     2,077,000     1,500,000        103,000        966,000        949,000        435,000     3,768,000        530,000     3,140,000     2,450,000     1,184,000        578,000        125,000        198,000        327,000        573,000        190,000     1,109,000     2,141,000     1,652,000        233,000        220,000        151,000     2,086,000     1,333,000        462,000        219,000     1,573,000     1,105,000     1,480,000     1,610,000 $64,861,500

$8,827,500      3,110,000      5,500,000 $17,437,500

$7,604,000 $4,991,000 $5,911,000 $4,000,000 $6,449,000     2,507,000     3,632,000     3,486,000     5,574,000      3,270,000                 ‐                 ‐                 ‐                 ‐                  ‐ $10,111,000 $8,623,000 $9,397,000 $9,574,000 $9,719,000

$28,955,000    18,469,000                  ‐ $47,424,000

$37,782,500  21,579,000     5,500,000 $64,861,500

2017 $0

         79,000          35,000        305,000     2,200,000        550,000                 ‐        125,000        212,000        381,000        110,000        200,000        305,000        300,000        200,000        150,000        298,000        129,000        320,000        931,000     1,500,000        130,000          25,000     1,026,000        600,000                 ‐

12

$0

Total  2016‐20

2020 $0

    2,255,000        584,000     1,017,000

       513,000        103,000     1,051,000        500,000        103,000          51,000          77,000          23,000     1,861,000        349,000        136,000

$8,623,000

       400,000                 ‐        915,000        872,000        412,000     1,907,000          89,000        140,000     2,450,000     1,184,000        578,000        125,000          11,000          18,000          30,000          11,000          58,000        111,000          86,000

         92,000     1,414,000      1,450,000

GREENVILLE WATER  2016‐2020 CIP  PROJECT SUMMARY BY TYPE 

Project  GENERAL  Central Campus Improvements  SCADA Study  New Bill Inserter FIS Project  Water Resources Master Plan  Residence at Trammel Gap  Remodel Table Rock Caretaker House Imaging System Update Emergency Response Plan  Arc Flash Compliance/Study Comprehensive Asset Management Program  Administrative Building Renovations  System Wide Security Master Plan Data Warehouse    TOTAL GENERAL  INTAKE North Saluda Intake Structure ‐ Rehab Gayley PS Portable Generator Connection Dredge Channel at North Saluda Intake and Outlet Bldg North Saluda Treating Station ‐ Rehab Table Rock Treating Station ‐ Rehab   TOTAL INTAKE VALVES Rutherford Rd ‐ Check Valves FCV Flow and Pressure Monitoring Improvements Remote Monitoring for PRVs   TOTAL VALVES PUMPING  Cliffs Valley/Upper Paris Mtn. PS Upgrade  Crestwood PS ‐ Increase Pump Size  Upper White Horse PS ‐ Increase Pump Capacity   TOTAL PUMPING  STORAGE  Paris Mountain/Lake Circle Storage Tank ‐ Repaint Tank  Repaint Wham Tank  Hillandale ‐ New Storage Tank Goodwin Bridge Reservoir ‐ Additional Storage   TOTAL STORAGE  TREATMENT  Clearwell Dehumidifiers Alkalinity Improvements at WTPs  Stovall WTP ‐ Redundant Transformer Stovall WTP ‐ New Roof Sludge Removal at WTPs  Residuals Handling Study and Permitting  Replace Lab Floors at Stovall WTP  Fume Hood Replacement at Stovall WTP Lab Adkins WTP ‐ Basin Rehab and Painting  Adkins WTP ‐ Filter Gallery Rehab Stovall WTP ‐ Painting    TOTAL TREATMENT  RESERVOIRS  Dam Improvements at Table Rock and North Saluda 

  Committed Funding $13,500,000         150,000         280,000         400,000         600,000         147,500

$15,077,500

$565,000

$565,000

Capital  Budget 2016

Planning Years Only  2018 2019

2017

       513,000        500,000        400,000        103,000                 ‐        349,000          89,000          92,000 $2,049,000 $489,000 $92,000

$1,017,000          23,000        412,000          11,000        179,000          11,000        187,000          18,000        309,000 $0 $1,040,000 $452,000 $675,000

$1,017,000         435,000         190,000         198,000         327,000 $0 $2,167,000

$1,582,000        435,000        190,000        198,000        327,000 $2,732,000

$129,000         219,000         219,000         462,000         462,000 $0 $681,000 $810,000

$129,000        219,000        462,000 $810,000

$0          58,000     1,051,000      1,109,000        111,000     1,003,000      1,027,000      2,141,000 $0 $169,000 $2,054,000 $1,027,000 $3,250,000

$850,000     1,109,000     2,141,000 $4,100,000

$79,000        578,000         578,000        136,000        140,000     1,414,000      1,450,000      3,140,000          86,000        773,000         793,000      1,652,000 $79,000 $136,000 $804,000 $2,187,000 $2,243,000 $5,449,000

$379,000        578,000     3,140,000     1,652,000 $5,749,000

       550,000          35,000        305,000        300,000        200,000        200,000        130,000        600,000                 ‐                 ‐ $2,320,000

       584,000

$129,000

$850,000

$0

$300,000

$79,000

$195,000         450,000

$645,000

Total  Project  $13,500,000        150,000        280,000        400,000     1,734,000        182,500        305,000        300,000        200,000        200,000        643,000     1,500,000        103,000        530,000 $20,027,500

$850,000

$300,000

Total  2016‐20 $0                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐      1,134,000           35,000         305,000         300,000         200,000         200,000         643,000      1,500,000         103,000         530,000 $0 $4,950,000

$129,000

$0

2020

$0

$0

$305,000     2,200,000     2,255,000        212,000        381,000     1,500,000        110,000        125,000          25,000        103,000          51,000        915,000          77,000        872,000                 ‐          30,000        543,000 $4,858,000 $2,486,000 $1,817,000 $543,000

$150,000

13

$305,000      4,455,000         212,000         381,000      1,500,000         110,000         125,000         128,000         966,000         949,000         573,000 $0 $9,704,000

$500,000     4,905,000        212,000        381,000     1,500,000        110,000        125,000        128,000        966,000        949,000        573,000 $10,349,000

$150,000

$150,000

GREENVILLE WATER  2016‐2020 CIP  PROJECT SUMMARY BY TYPE (cont'd)

Project  MAINS  Piney Mountain Rd #1 ‐ New Main Aiken Chapel Rd ‐ New Water Main N Pleasantburg Rd ‐ Parallel Water Main Rutherford Rd ‐ New Water Main  Highway 276 ‐ New Water Main SE Main St ‐ New Water Main Main St ‐ Replace 24‐in Main  Pineforest Dr ‐ New Water Main Pelham Commons Blvd ‐ New Water Main S Parker Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main S Buckhorn Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main Tally Bridge Rd ‐ New Water Main Bates Crossing Rd ‐ New Water Main Moore Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main Old White Horse Rd ‐ Replacement Main Goodwin Bridge Rd ‐ New Water Main Wellborn Rd to Saluda River ‐ Inspect 72‐in Trans Main   TOTAL MAINS  TOTAL CIP 

  Committed Funding

Capital  Budget 2016

2017

$298,000        320,000        931,000     1,026,000     1,051,000     1,861,000

Planning Years Only  2018 2019

Total  2016‐20

Total  Project 

$298,000         320,000         931,000      2,077,000      3,768,000         125,000      2,450,000      1,184,000         233,000         220,000         151,000      2,086,000      1,333,000      1,105,000      1,480,000      1,610,000      1,573,000 $20,944,000

$298,000        320,000        931,000     2,077,000     3,768,000        125,000     2,450,000     1,184,000        233,000        220,000        151,000     2,086,000     1,333,000     1,105,000     1,480,000     1,610,000     1,573,000 $20,944,000

$9,719,000 $47,424,000

$64,861,500

2020

    1,907,000        125,000     2,450,000     1,184,000        233,000        220,000        151,000     2,086,000     1,333,000

$0

$2,575,000

$2,912,000

$5,666,000

     1,105,000      1,480,000      1,610,000      1,573,000 $4,023,000 $5,768,000

$17,437,500

$10,111,000

$8,623,000

$9,397,000

$9,574,000

14

GREENVILLE WATER  2016‐2020 CIP  PROJECT SUMMARY BY FUNDING SOURCE  Project  RATES/RESERVES  Central Campus Improvements  New Bill Inserter FIS Project  Residence at Trammel Gap  Replace Lab Floors at Stovall WTP  Paris Mountain/Lake Circle Storage Tank ‐ Repaint Tank  Stovall WTP ‐ Redundant Transformer Stovall WTP ‐ New Roof Residuals Handling Study and Permitting  Arc Flash Compliance/Study Remodel Table Rock Caretaker House Imaging System Clearwell Dehumidifiers Update Emergency Response Plan  Dam Improvements at Table Rock and North Saluda  Sludge Removal at WTPs  Piney Mountain Rd #1 ‐ New Main Rutherford Rd ‐ Check Valves Aiken Chapel Rd ‐ New Water Main Alkalinity Improvements at WTPs Comprehensive Asset Management Program  Fume Hood Replacement at Stovall WTP Lab Administrative Building Renovations  North Saluda Intake Structure ‐ Rehab System Wide Security Master Plan Adkins WTP ‐ Basin Rehab and Painting  Adkins WTP ‐ Filter Gallery Rehab Gayley PS Portable Generator Connection Data Warehouse  Repaint Wham Tank  SE Main St ‐ New Water Main Main St ‐ Replace 24‐in Main  North Saluda Treating Station ‐ Rehab Table Rock Treating Station ‐ Rehab Stovall WTP ‐ Painting  Dredge Channel at North Saluda Intake and Outlet Bldg Pelham Commons Blvd ‐ New Water Main S Parker Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main S Buckhorn Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main Tally Bridge Rd ‐ New Water Main Remote Monitoring for PRVs FCV Flow and Pressure Monitoring Improvements Wellborn Rd to Saluda River ‐ Inspect 72‐in Trans Main Moore Rd ‐ Replacement Water Main Old White Horse Rd ‐ Replacement Main Goodwin Bridge Rd ‐ New Water Main   TOTAL RATES/RESERVES 

  Committed Funding $8,000,000         280,000         400,000         147,500

$8,827,500

Capital  Budget 2016

2017

         35,000        125,000          79,000        212,000        381,000        110,000        200,000        305,000        300,000        305,000        200,000        150,000    1,500,000        298,000        129,000        320,000    2,200,000        130,000          25,000        600,000

$7,604,000

   2,255,000        513,000        103,000        500,000    1,017,000        103,000          51,000          77,000          23,000        349,000

$4,991,000

15

Planning Years Only  2018 2019

2020

       400,000

       915,000        872,000        412,000          89,000        578,000        125,000    2,450,000          11,000          18,000          30,000          11,000

$5,911,000

         92,000

       187,000        309,000        543,000        179,000        233,000        220,000        151,000    2,086,000        462,000        219,000     1,573,000     1,105,000     1,480,000     1,610,000 $4,000,000 $6,449,000

Total  2016‐20

Total  Project 

$0                 ‐                 ‐           35,000         125,000           79,000         212,000         381,000         110,000         200,000         305,000         300,000         305,000         200,000         150,000      1,500,000         298,000         129,000         320,000      4,455,000         643,000         128,000      1,500,000      1,017,000         103,000         966,000         949,000         435,000         530,000         578,000         125,000      2,450,000         198,000         327,000         573,000         190,000         233,000         220,000         151,000      2,086,000         462,000         219,000      1,573,000      1,105,000      1,480,000      1,610,000 $28,955,000

$8,000,000        280,000        400,000        182,500        125,000          79,000        212,000        381,000        110,000        200,000        305,000        300,000        305,000        200,000        150,000    1,500,000        298,000        129,000        320,000    4,455,000        643,000        128,000    1,500,000    1,017,000        103,000        966,000        949,000        435,000        530,000        578,000        125,000    2,450,000        198,000        327,000        573,000        190,000        233,000        220,000        151,000    2,086,000        462,000        219,000    1,573,000    1,105,000    1,480,000    1,610,000 $37,782,500

GREENVILLE WATER  2016‐2020 CIP  PROJECT SUMMARY BY FUNDING SOURCE (cont'd)

  Committed Funding

Project  CAPACITY FEES  Paris Mountain/Lake Circle Storage Tank ‐ Repaint Tank  Alkalinity Improvements at Treatment Plants  Clearwell Dehumidifiers SCADA Study  North Saluda Intake Structure ‐ Rehab Cliffs Valley/Upper Paris Mtn. PS Upgrade  Water Resources Master Plan  N Pleasantburg Rd ‐ Parallel Water Main Rutherford Rd ‐ New Water Main  Highway 276 ‐ New Water Main Hillandale ‐ New Storage Tank Crestwood PS ‐ Increase Pump Size  Upper White Horse PS ‐ Increase Pump Capacity Goodwin Bridge Reservoir ‐ Additional Storage Pineforest Dr ‐ New Water Main Bates Crossing Rd ‐ New Water Main   TOTAL CAPACITY FEES DEBT  Central Campus Improvements 

$300,000         450,000         195,000         150,000         565,000         850,000         600,000

$3,110,000

Capital  Budget 2016

2017

       550,000        931,000    1,026,000

$2,507,000

Planning Years Only  2018 2019

2020

       584,000    1,051,000    1,861,000        136,000

$3,632,000

   1,907,000        140,000          58,000        111,000          86,000    1,184,000 $3,486,000

   1,414,000    1,051,000    1,003,000        773,000    1,333,000 $5,574,000

    1,450,000                ‐     1,027,000        793,000

$3,270,000

Total  2016‐20

Total  Project 

$0                 ‐                 ‐                 ‐                 ‐                 ‐      1,134,000         931,000      2,077,000      3,768,000      3,140,000      1,109,000      2,141,000      1,652,000      1,184,000      1,333,000 $18,469,000

$300,000        450,000        195,000        150,000        565,000        850,000    1,734,000        931,000    2,077,000    3,768,000    3,140,000    1,109,000    2,141,000    1,652,000    1,184,000    1,333,000 $21,579,000

$5,500,000

TOTAL CIP 

$17,437,500    

   

$5,500,000 $10,111,000

$8,623,000

$9,397,000

$9,574,000

$9,719,000 $47,424,000

  

SUMMARY OF ADDITIONAL OPERATING IMPACTS 

Capital  Budget Total  Planning Years Only  2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016‐20 $152,600 $201,077 $207,035 $213,200 $219,580 $993,492                ‐        499,800        514,794        530,238        546,145      2,090,977 $152,600 $700,877 $721,829 $743,438 $765,725 $3,084,468

Central Campus Improvements  Alkalinity Improvements at WTPs Total Operating Impacts 

                            

16

$64,861,500

 

Project Descriptions

2016‐20 CIP 

CENTRAL CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Consists of constructing a new operations facility and relocating the Field Operations group and vehicle maintenance facility from its existing  location at 87 Mayberry St. to newly acquired property adjacent to the Main office located at 407 W. Broad St.  The colocation of the Field  Operations and Management on one campus will allow for better oversight and efficiencies of operation.  

PROJECT STATUS  Pending closeout in 2016 with project anticipated to be completed during 2nd quarter.   METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Under contract  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING  $57,000

2016

         810,000          359,000     11,910,000          364,000 $13,500,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING  $8,000,000       5,500,000 $13,500,000

2017

$0

2016

2018

$0

2017

$0

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $8,000,000                     ‐         5,500,000 $0 $13,500,000

2019

$0

2018

$0

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 COST $57,000                     ‐             810,000             359,000       11,910,000             364,000 $0 $13,500,000

2019

$0

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 IMPACT $152,600 $201,077 $207,035 $213,200 $219,580 $993,492         152,600         353,677         560,712         773,912          993,492             993,492                     1                         1                  ‐                     1                     1                      1                       1                         1

17

2016‐20 CIP 

SCADA STUDY  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  This project consists of a study to determine the best approach to Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) improvements.The SCADA  system at the Stovall Plant was placed in service in 2000.  Computer hardware and software have a useful service life.  Prior to making upgrades to  the system a detailed sudy should be performed.

PROJECT STATUS  Continuation  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  A cost estimate was provided in the 2009 Master Plan updated with an inflation factor. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             150,000                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $150,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0             150,000                     ‐ $0 $150,000

         150,000

$150,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

         150,000 $150,000

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

18

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

NEW BILL INSERTER  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Project adds a second folder/inserter to serve as a more modernized system, adding not only the redundancy aspect to billing operations, but also  greater speed in output. Newer model will serve as the primary insertion system, with the existing Pitney Bowes Series 8 serving as a  backup/parallel, running system, depending on circumstances. When the existing folder/inserter was procured in 2007, billing volumes were lower  under quarterly billing, so it now processes three times the volume than was anticipated.  Any stoppage of the system for even a half‐day causes a  backup in workflow processes, and poses risks of sending bills late to customers.  PROJECT STATUS  Planned/Programmed  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  A past quote from Pitney Bowes for an equivalent‐class inserter updated for inflation.  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐             280,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $280,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $280,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $280,000

         280,000

$280,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING  $280,000

$0

2016

$280,000

$0

2017

$0

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

19

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

FIS PROJECT  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  This project is for enhancements to our Microsoft Dynamics GP financial software.   The installation of additional modules will improve workflows,  increase staff efficiency and provide greater transparency and access to financial, human resource, and employee information.   Enhancements to be  purchased and implemented include the following:  bank reconciliation module, HR module (creation of annual employee benefits statement),  encumbrance module, online applicant tracking software,  "on demand" reports and inquiry functionality, capital project tracking software,  automated time reporting and time off management software, purchase requistion software and fleet management software.  PROJECT STATUS  Continuation ‐ HR module activated (annual benefits statement generated), , bank reconciliation and encumbrance modules implemented.   Purchase requisition, time reporting and time off, and applicant tracking software purchased and implemented .  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Quote provided by Microsoft Value Added Reseller (VAR).   SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             400,000                     ‐ $0 $400,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $400,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $400,000

         400,000 $400,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING  $400,000

$0

2016

$400,000

$0

2017

$0

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

20

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

WATER RESOURCES MASTER PLAN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  This project includes an intensive, long range, water resource planning effort for the next 100 years so that GW can identify and begin pursuit of the  next water source to meet growing water supply demands.  Phase I is complete and involved projections of population and future water  requirements, safe yield studies and reservoir optimization, assessment of the Broad River basin water resource and the development of a Saluda  River basin model.  Phase II will involve an analysis of the Saluda, Broad and Upper Savannah River basins as well Surface Water Withdrawal permits  and Lake Keowee permitted withdrawals.  Phase III will identify and develop potential water supplies. PROJECT STATUS  Revision ‐ Phases II and III have been added.  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Pricing provided by consultant.  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

         600,000

$600,000

2016

        550,000

$550,000

2017

$584,000

2016

2017

         600,000

        550,000

        584,000

$550,000

2016

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐         1,734,000                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $1,734,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0         1,734,000                     ‐ $0 $1,734,000

        584,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$600,000

2018

$0

2018

$584,000

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

21

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

RESIDENCE AT TRAMMEL GAP  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  To construct a new residence at Trammell Gap Road to house Watershed personnel to help maintain security on the northern boundary of the North  Saluda Watershed.  The current residence is in disrepair and needs to be replaced.   

PROJECT STATUS  Revision ‐ additional money requested for 2016 to tear down old house, old barn, seal well, and rebuild new barn. Construction of new residence is  substantially complete.  $20,000 transferred in 2015 from N. Saluda Intake Repairs project.  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Contract and contractor estimate.  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

         147,500 $147,500

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             182,500                     ‐ $0 $182,500

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $182,500                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $182,500

          35,000 $35,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING  $147,500

2016 $35,000

$147,500

$35,000

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

22

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

REMODEL TABLE ROCK CARETAKER HOUSE  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  Maintenance 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  A complete remodel to address structural issues, and bring the house up to current building code standards.  The remodel will also improve energy  efficiency and make the structure more habitable for our caretaker.  This will be the most substantial rehabilitation of this residence since its  construction by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s. 

PROJECT STATUS  New ‐ project moved from operating budget due to quotes exceeding $100,000.   METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Architect estimate   SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             305,000                     ‐ $0 $305,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $305,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $305,000

        305,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$305,000

2016 $305,000

$0

2017

$305,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

23

2019

$0

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

2020

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

IMAGING SYSTEM  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General System Management

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Replaces existing Documentum imaging system, converts existing data in the system, and to indexes all images to accounts. The imaging system  serves as a reference filing system for several processes, especially in Engineering and Business Services, and users barely recognize the service is  there, operating at a sublayer beneath products like CIS Infinity. Paper items are scanned from paper daily‐‐maps; service orders; contracts; check  remittances; and other correspondences. These scanned images are important when discussing details with customers regarding their accounts, and  its continual operation is vital to the flow of operations in the field regarding tap orders, and contractual concerns with developers. The project also  includes replacement of scanning hardware, and includes an effort to integrate existing scanning capabilities into the project. PROJECT STATUS  Planned/Programmed  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Costs of the existing and competing systems, informal estimates of manpower costs‐per‐hour for technical expertise to convert the data.   SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  The existing imaging system has been off software support for over three years and has missed several software updates in the interim.  Repairs may  require purchasing upgrades to the current version, which could exceed cost of a data conversion and implementation. 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐             300,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $300,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $300,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $300,000

        300,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$300,000

2016 $300,000

$0

2017

$300,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

24

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

UPDATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The current ERP was completed in 2003 and is in need of an overall comprehensive system wide update.  The propose scope of work will include and  updated threat identification, be it natural or man‐made, development of a business and technology continuity plan, and pandemic plan. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Staff estimate SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             200,000                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $200,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $200,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $200,000

        200,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$200,000

2016 $200,000

$0

2017

$200,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

25

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

ARC FLASH COMPLIANCE/STUDY PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Compliance with the OSHA arc flash regulations requires a study which results in a safe work program including classroom training, physical training  on the specific equipment involved, and training on the proper use and care of the required personal protective equipment.  Arc flash compliance  ensures adequate protection of employees from injury from electric components.  A safety consultant will be hired to conduct the study and there  will be some cost to implement the study recommendations.  The consultant will prepare and arc flash PPE report, arc flash diagrams and labels, as  well as conduct training sessions.   PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Consultant's estimate  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             200,000                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $200,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $200,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $200,000

        200,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$200,000

2016 $200,000

$0

2017

$200,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

26

2019

$0

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

2020

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

COMPREHENSIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Develop a comprehensive Asset Management Program.  Phase I will consist of an organizational capacity assessment to assess current maintenance  management practices including work order generation, asset inventory, preventative maintenance and scheduling.  Phase 1 will also include an  evaluation of the staff and organization needs to properly and fully implement and utilize a CMMS. Phase 2 is the selection and implementation of a  GIS integrated Computerized Maintenance Management System for all vertical and horizontal assets (plants, pump stations, reservoirs, pipelines,  etc) PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Consultant estimate  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             130,000                     ‐             513,000                     ‐ $0 $643,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $643,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $643,000

        130,000         513,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$130,000

$513,000

2016 $130,000

2017 $513,000

$130,000

$513,000

2016

2017

$0

2018

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

27

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING RENOVATIONS  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Subject to project budget constraints, the following improvements and renovations will be considered; relocate Commission Meeting Room to first  level; paint and carpet all interior space; renovate or replace HVAC system; paint wood exterior; power wash and clean aluminum exterior; relocate  engineering and remodel training room area on second floor. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Architect's estimate  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

        600,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$600,000

2017

        500,000 $500,000

2018

$400,000

2017 $500,000

2018 $400,000

$600,000

$500,000

$400,000

2017

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐         1,500,000                     ‐ $0 $1,500,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $1,500,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $1,500,000

        400,000

2016 $600,000

2016

2019

2018

2019

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

28

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

SYSTEM WIDE SECURITY MASTER PLAN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Security Risk Assessment Master Plan a will provide recommendations for the following aspects:  technical and physical security measures to  mitigate or reduce risk to staff, data and infrastructure assets; security awareness programs to prevent crimes, trespassing, and terrorism related  events; modifications to existing security policies and procedures as appropriate; incident response measures for security driven events; phased  Security implementation strategies with detailed security design cost estimates for recommended measures.  PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Staff estimate  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             103,000                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $103,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $103,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $103,000

        103,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

2017 $103,000

$0

2016

$103,000

$0

2018

$103,000

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

29

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

DATA WAREHOUSE PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

General  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Implementation of a data warehousing system which will be used to integrate all Greenville Water data sources, serving as a hub for conversion,  correlation and reporting that spans backward through record periods for purposes of contrast and trend analysis.This enables the shaping of data  over periods if time which supports key performance indicators, and protects the integrity of production database. The DW system will serve as a  central hub of information that can be summoned by any department for reports and comparisons, to include auto‐populated dashboards. The  system will offload the performance impact of reports being run from production systems, which affects productivity negatively. Examples of data to  be integrated: CIS; GIS; Financials; LIMS; OperationsWork Orders; Field Services Work Orders; Befare/After listing; etc. PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Based on Teradata projected costs of $34,000 per terabyte, and with an estimate of 15 terabytes.  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

        349,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

$0

2016

$349,000

2018

          89,000 $89,000

2019

$92,000

2018 $89,000

2019 $92,000

$349,000

$89,000

$92,000

2018

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             530,000                     ‐ $0 $530,000

          92,000

2017 $349,000

2017

2020

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $530,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $530,000

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

30

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

NORTH SALUDA INTAKE STRUCTURE ‐ REHAB PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Intake  Condition/ Reliability

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Replace top portion of screen.  Replace electrical equipment on intake.  New power supply, including poles and wiring from treating station to  intake.  Concrete repairs. 

PROJECT STATUS  Revision ‐ cost updated as part of Facilities Master Plan.   In 2015, $40,000 was transferred to the Study for North Saluda Pump Station project and  $20,000 was transferred to the Trammel Gap Residence project.  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             109,000                     ‐         1,292,000             181,000 $0 $1,582,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $1,017,000             565,000                     ‐ $0 $1,582,000

        109,000          565,000

        727,000         181,000 $0 $1,017,000

$565,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017 $1,017,000

$0

2018

2019

         565,000 $565,000

$0

2016

$1,017,000

2017

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

31

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

GAYLEY PS PORTABLE GENERATOR CONNECTION  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Intake  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Installation of portable generator plug and electrical modifications to operate one pump. 

PROJECT STATUS  New METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Recommended in CH2MHill Report. 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

          23,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2018 $412,000

$23,000

$412,000

2017

2020

$0

$0                     ‐               46,000                     ‐             311,000               78,000 $0 $435,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $435,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $435,000

          23,000

2017 $23,000

$0

2016

2019

        311,000           78,000 $23,000 $412,000

$0

2016

2018

2018

2019

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

32

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

DREDGE CHANNEL AT NORTH SALUDA INTAKE AND OUTLET BLDG PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Intake  Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Overall general repairs and maintenance.  Dredge channel beneath outlet structure as needed. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

          11,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

$0

2017

2019

2020

$0                     ‐               21,000                     ‐             135,000               34,000 $0 $190,000

          10,000

        135,000           34,000 $11,000 $179,000

2018 $11,000

2019 $179,000

$11,000

$179,000

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $190,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $190,000

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

33

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

NORTH SALUDA TREATING STATION ‐ REHAB PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Intake  Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Repainting of interior of structure as needed.  Replace windows and remove unused equipment.  Repainting of interior large piping beneath treating  station.

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

          11,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

$0

2017

2019

2020

$0                     ‐               22,000                     ‐             141,000               35,000 $0 $198,000

          11,000

        141,000           35,000 $11,000 $187,000

2018 $11,000

2019 $187,000

$11,000

$187,000

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $198,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $198,000

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

34

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

TABLE ROCK TREATING STATION ‐ REHAB PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Intake  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Repainting of interior of structure as needed.  Replace windows and remove unused equipment.  Replace strainer and Ludlow gate valves in pit.   Transition above‐grade pits to vaults.

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

          18,000

$0

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

$0

2017

2019

2020

$0                     ‐               35,000                     ‐             234,000               58,000 $0 $327,000

          17,000

        234,000           58,000 $18,000 $309,000

2018 $18,000

2019 $309,000

$18,000

$309,000

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $327,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $327,000

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

35

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

RUTHERFORD RD ‐ CHECK VALVES  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Valves  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Add 2 check valves located on pipes 32353 and 26301. Part of the Zone Boundary adjustment from Gravity to Hillandale. 

PROJECT STATUS  New METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Must have for Rutherford Rd ‐ New Water Main project to work.  

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐               14,000                     ‐               92,000               23,000 $0 $129,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $129,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $129,000

          14,000           92,000           23,000 $0 $129,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016 $129,000

$0

2017

$129,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

36

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

FCV FLOW AND PRESSURE MONITORING IMPROVEMENTS  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Valves  Reliability 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Install flow and pressure monitoring on existing flow control valves at JL Mann and Green avenue. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  SCADA improvements

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2017

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

2018

2018

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             23,000               23,000                     ‐          157,000             157,000             39,000               39,000 $0 $219,000 $219,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $219,000 $219,000                     ‐                     ‐ $219,000 $219,000

2018

$0

2017

2019

2019

$0

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

37

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

REMOTE MONITORING FOR PRVs PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Valves  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  This project consists of installing  remote monitoring devices for PRV's to monitor upstream and downstream pressure and valve position.   This  information is important to know if PRV's are functioning properly and allowing the storage tanks to operate properly. There are approximately 53  PRV's.

PROJECT STATUS  Revision ‐ contingency added.  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Estimate based on manufacturer's data.   SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

$0

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2017

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

2018

2018

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐          348,000             348,000          114,000             114,000 $0 $462,000 $462,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $462,000 $462,000                     ‐                     ‐ $462,000 $462,000

2018

$0

2017

2019

2019

$0

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

38

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

CLIFFS VALLEY/UPPER PARIS MTN PS UPGRADE PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Pumping  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The firm capacity of the Cliffs Valley Pump Station will be increased from 250 gpm to 800 gpm.  A new diesel generator willl be added to the Cliffs  Valley Pump Station for backup power supply.   Currently, one pump is equipped with a diesel drive, but if this pump is not available, then there is no  emergency pumping available. With the addition of a new connection for the Blue Ridge Rural Water Company to serve the Cliffs Valley North  community, the need for redundancy is essential.  The firm capacity of the Paris Mountain Pump Station will be increased from 125 gpm to 250 gpm.   The Paris Mountain Pump Station has operated at a max day 116% of firm capacity with a 5 year max day average of approximately 94% of firm  capacity.  These peaking conditions typically occur during the hottest summer days.  It is recommended that plans be made to increase pumping  capacity when a pump station operates at approximately 80% firm capacity during peak summer usage.The existing generator will be reviewed to  determine if it is capable of operating the new pumps.  An engineering study was performed to determine recommended pump capacities and  number of pumps to be installed.   PROJECT STATUS  Continuation ‐ substantially complete  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan.  Manufacturer's estimate for the generators.  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                       ‐                       ‐                       ‐              850,000                       ‐ $0 $850,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0             850,000                     ‐ $0 $850,000

         850,000 $850,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

         850,000 $850,000

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

39

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

CRESTWOOD PS ‐ INCREASE PUMP SIZE PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Pumping  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Analysis of system demand indicated the need for a firm capacity increase to 5.5 MGD at 185 ft.

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Alternative analysis of E. Paris Mtn PS & Reservoir. 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

          58,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

$0

2017

2019

2020

$0                     ‐             117,000                     ‐             794,000             198,000 $0 $1,109,000

          59,000

        794,000         198,000 $58,000 $1,051,000

2018

2019

          58,000

     1,051,000

$58,000

2018

$1,051,000

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0         1,109,000                     ‐ $0 $1,109,000

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

40

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

UPPER WHITE HORSE PS ‐ INCREASE PUMP CAPACITY  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Pumping Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Analysis of system demand indicated the need for a firm capacity increase to 4.5 MGD at 185 ft. Recommendation is to separate the plant water PS  from the Service area PS. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Based on firm capacity & MDD demands spreadsheet analysis. 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

         111,000             57,000             58,000

$0 COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

$0

2016

$0

         757,000          775,000          189,000          194,000 $111,000 $1,003,000 $1,027,000

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST $0                       ‐              226,000                       ‐           1,532,000              383,000 $2,141,000

TOTAL  PROJECT  2017 2018 2019 2020 FINANCING  $0         111,000      1,003,000       1,027,000         2,141,000                     ‐ $0 $111,000 $1,003,000 $1,027,000 $2,141,000

2017

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

41

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

PARIS MOUNTAIN/LAKE CIRCLE STORAGE TANK ‐ REPAINT TANK PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Storage  Age/Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Based on sequencing of tank painting, this tank is due for repainting.

PROJECT STATUS  Revision ‐ contingency added.  Out for bid.  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Historical pricing and Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

             3,000           76,000 $79,000 $300,000

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             303,000               76,000 $0 $379,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $79,000             300,000                     ‐ $0 $379,000

         300,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016 $79,000

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

         300,000 $300,000

$79,000

2016

$0

2017

42

$0

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

2020

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

REPAINT WHAM TANK  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Storage  Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Based on sequencing of tank painting, this tank is due for repainting.

PROJECT STATUS  Planned/Programmed  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             578,000                     ‐ $0 $578,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $578,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $578,000

        578,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

2018 $578,000

$0

2017

$578,000

2019

$578,000

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

43

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

HILLANDALE ‐ NEW STORAGE TANK  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Storage  Condition/Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  New tank with 1.5 MG prestressed concrete reservoir. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Alternative analysis of E. Paris Mtn PS & Reservoir. 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

        136,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$0

$136,000

2018

        140,000

2019

        143,000

     1,017,000         254,000 $1,414,000 $140,000

2020

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

$0                     ‐          148,000             567,000                     ‐       1,042,000         2,059,000          260,000             514,000 $1,450,000 $3,140,000

TOTAL  PROJECT  2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 FINANCING  $0         136,000         140,000      1,414,000       1,450,000         3,140,000                     ‐ $0 $136,000 $140,000 $1,414,000 $1,450,000 $3,140,000

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

44

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

GOODWIN BRIDGE RESERVOIR ‐ ADDITIONAL STORAGE PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Storage  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Analysis of system demand indicated the need for an additional 0.5 MG of storage at this location in the Upper White Horse Pressure Zone. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Spreadsheet analysis for storage requirements for each zone.  

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

          86,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

$0

2016

$0

2019

          43,000

        584,000         146,000 $86,000 $773,000

2020

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

$0                     ‐             45,000             174,000                     ‐          598,000         1,182,000          150,000             296,000 $793,000 $1,652,000

TOTAL  PROJECT  2017 2018 2019 2020 FINANCING  $0           86,000         773,000          793,000         1,652,000                     ‐ $0 $86,000 $773,000 $793,000 $1,652,000

2017

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

45

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

CLEARWELL DEHUMIDIFIERS  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment  Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Replacement of 3 dehumidifiers in the basement of the Adkins Treatement Plant. Installation of a coolant on the exhaust to prevent heat build up in  the basement.  Replacements needed due to the considerable amount of corrosion that is taking place on the metal surfaces in the filter gallery  located in the basement of Adkins plant.   

PROJECT STATUS  Revision ‐ engineering study performed to make recommendation to address humidity conditions.  Additional funding requested in 2016 to fully  cover the cost of replacing the dehumidifiers and any ventilation work that may be needed.     METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Estimate obtained from manufacturer.  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

         195,000

$195,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐             500,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $500,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $305,000             195,000                     ‐ $0 $500,000

        305,000

$305,000

2016 $305,000

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

         195,000 $195,000

$305,000

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

46

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

ALKALINITY IMPROVEMENTS AT WTPs PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The HDR 2013 Corrosion Control Study recommended implementation of the following improvements: ‐ Construct pre and post liquid lime feed systems at the Stovall and Adkins WTPs ‐ Construct a post CO2 alkalinity supplementation feed system at the Stovall and Adkins WTPs These improvements will enhance operator safety as these facilities, add additional buffering capacity to GW’s finished water to reduce finished  water pH variations, improve distribution system water quality, limit corrosion potential and mitigate recent and projected chemical pricing volatility  associated with the use of caustic soda as a pH adjustment chemical. PROJECT STATUS  Revision ‐ cost estimate updated as part of Facilities Master Plan  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  HDR Corrosion Control Study and Facilities Master Plan SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             450,000                     ‐         4,455,000                     ‐ $0 $4,905,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $4,455,000             450,000                     ‐ $0 $4,905,000

         450,000      2,200,000 $450,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$2,200,000

     2,255,000 $2,255,000

2016 $2,200,000

2017 $2,255,000

$2,200,000

$2,255,000

$0

2018

2019

         450,000 $450,000

2016                  ‐                  ‐

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  2017 2018 2019 2020 IMPACT $499,800 $514,794 $530,238 $546,145 $2,090,977         499,800      1,014,594      1,544,832       2,090,977         2,090,977                     ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                     ‐

47

2016‐20 CIP 

STOVALL WTP ‐ REDUNDANT TRANSFORMER PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment  Redundancy

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Install redundant 225kva 4160 to 480 transformer near FWPS.

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐               23,000             151,000               38,000                     ‐ $0 $212,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $212,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $212,000

          23,000         151,000           38,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$212,000

2016 $212,000

$0

2017

$212,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

48

2019

$0

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

2020

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

STOVALL WTP ‐ NEW ROOF  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment  Age/Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Replace original roof on DAF building that was built in 2000.  Roof is exhibiting signs of deterioration.  

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Estimate provided by Black & Veatch.   SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             381,000                     ‐ $0 $381,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $381,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $381,000

        381,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$381,000

2016 $381,000

$0

2017

$381,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

49

2019

$0

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

2020

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

SLUDGE REMOVAL AT WTPs PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment   System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Periodic removal of accumulated sludge at Adkins WTP that is performed every 5‐7 years.  First time removal of sludge from lagoons that has  accumulated at Stovall WTP since the plant was placed in service.   

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Vendor quote  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐         1,500,000                     ‐ $0 $1,500,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $1,500,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $1,500,000

     1,500,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$1,500,000

2016 $1,500,000

$0

2017

$1,500,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

50

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

RESIDUALS HANDLING AND PERMITTING STUDY PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Residuals handling study (both WTPs).  Permitting for land application of residuals at Stovall plant.  Evaluate automation of centrifuge operation at  Stovall.

PROJECT STATUS  Planned/Programmed  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan   SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             110,000                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $110,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $110,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $110,000

        110,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$110,000

2016 $110,000

$0

2017

$110,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

51

2019

$0

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

2020

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

REPLACE LAB FLOORS AT STOVALL WTP  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Replace original flooring in facility that was built in 2000.  Floor has damage and/or significant wear.   

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Estimate obtained from contractor for 5,000 sq. ft. at $18/sq.ft..   SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             125,000                     ‐ $0 $125,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $125,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $125,000

        125,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$125,000

2016 $125,000

$0

2017

$125,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

52

2019

$0

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

2020

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

FUME HOOD REPLACEMENT AT STOVALL WTP LAB PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment  System Management 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Project involves having a consultant evaluate the 4 fume hoods in the laboratory to determine if more energy efficient hoods are available.  The  current hoods are on all the time resulting in very high energy bills.  Replacement hoods would be purchased based on consultant's  recommendation that will take into account safety regulations, the safety of laboratory staff and minimizing energy usage. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Staff estimate  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐               25,000             103,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $128,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $128,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $128,000

          25,000         103,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$25,000

$103,000

2016 $25,000

2017 $103,000

$25,000

$103,000

2016

2017

$0

2018

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

53

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

ADKINS WTP ‐ BASIN REHAB AND PAINTING  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment  Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Repaint/repair flocculators, sludge collectors (1985 basins only), and baffle walls.  Minor paint repair to rapid mixer motors. Perform touchup  painting on finished water equipment/ piping as needed. General touchup painting at residuals facility. keowee RWPS ‐ Minor painting.  Repair basin  concrete and expansion joints.  Sedimentation basin flume and gate modifications to allow for year 2003 sedimentation basins to feed the year 1985  filters.  Install water pipe headers around basins. PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements  Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

          51,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2018 $915,000

$51,000

$915,000

2017

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             104,000                     ‐             690,000             172,000 $0 $966,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $966,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $966,000

          53,000

2017 $51,000

$0

2016

2019

        690,000         172,000 $51,000 $915,000

$0

2016

2018

2018

2019

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

54

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

ADKINS WTP ‐ FILTER GALLERY REHAB PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Filter gallery rehabilitation including repainting/repair of piping, panels as needed.  New pneumatic filter effluent valves.  New filter control panels.   Repair existing filter coating.

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

          77,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2018 $872,000

$77,000

$872,000

2017

2020

$0

$0                     ‐             100,000                     ‐             679,000             170,000 $0 $949,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $949,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $949,000

          23,000

2017 $77,000

$0

2016

2019

        679,000         170,000 $77,000 $872,000

$0

2016

2018

2018

2019

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

55

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

STOVALL WTP ‐ PAINTING  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Treatment  Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Painting ‐ raw water piping, DAF gallery piping, DAF effluent flume, filter gallery piping, finished water PS piping, residuals piping, repair chemical  containment coatings.

PROJECT STATUS  New METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

          30,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

$0

2017

2019

2020

$0                     ‐               60,000                     ‐             411,000             102,000 $0 $573,000

          30,000

        411,000         102,000 $30,000 $543,000

2018 $30,000

2019 $543,000

$30,000

$543,000

2018

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $573,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $573,000

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

56

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

DAM IMPROVEMENTS AT TABLE ROCK AND NORTH SALUDA PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Reservoirs  Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Address perched water issue at North Saluda dam identified by 2014 BLE evaluation.  Installation of electronic instrumentation to enhance dam  operations at both reservoirs.   Additional improvements may be needed based on recommendations of geotechnical evaluation by BLE.  

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Staff estimate  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐             150,000                     ‐ $0 $150,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $150,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $150,000

        150,000 $0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

$150,000

2016 $150,000

$0

2017

$150,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

57

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

PINEY MOUNTAIN RD #1 ‐ NEW MAIN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The new water main will maintain looping and service to the southern portion of Hillandale. Location is Piney Mountain Rd from Milian Dr to View  Point Dr.  PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Must have for Rutherford Rd ‐ New Water Main project to work.  

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                  8,000                31,000                      ‐              207,000                52,000 $0 $298,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $298,000                      ‐                      ‐ $0 $298,000

             8,000            31,000          207,000            52,000 $0 $298,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016 $298,000

$0

2017

$298,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

58

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

AIKEN CHAPEL RD ‐ NEW WATER MAIN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Fire Flow 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  New water main is needed for fire flow capacity (addresses minimum 500 gpm Fire flow and cluster area). Location is Aiken Chapel Rd from Riverside Dr  to Old Chick Springs Rd.  PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                  6,000                34,000                      ‐              224,000                56,000 $0 $320,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $320,000                      ‐                      ‐ $0 $320,000

             6,000            34,000          224,000            56,000 $320,000 $0 COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016 $320,000

$0

2017

$320,000

2016

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019

$0

2018

2019

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

59

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

N PLEASANTBURG RD ‐ PARALLEL WATER MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Part of the Zone Boundary adjustment from Gravity to Hillandale. Location is N Pleasantburg Dr from Piney Mountain Rd to Rutherford Rd; Parallel  to 8‐inch.  PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Must have for Rutherford Rd ‐ New Water Main project to work.  

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                     ‐               99,000                     ‐             666,000             166,000 $0 $931,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0             931,000                     ‐ $0 $931,000

          99,000         666,000         166,000 $0 $931,000

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

        931,000 $0

$931,000

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

60

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

RUTHERFORD RD ‐ NEW WATER MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Part of the Zone Boundary adjustment from Gravity to Hillandale. Also, the connection from the 16‐inch transmission line should be moved to the  new water main. Location is Rutherford Rd from Waddell Rd to N Pleasantburg; Parallel to 16‐inch.  PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Significant improvement 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

2017

          19,000         108,000         719,000         180,000

          20,000         111,000         736,000         184,000

$1,026,000

$1,051,000

2016

2017

     1,026,000

     1,051,000

$1,026,000

2016

2018

$0

2018

$1,051,000

2017

2019

$0

$0               39,000             219,000         1,455,000             364,000                     ‐ $0 $2,077,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0         2,077,000                     ‐ $0 $2,077,000

2019

$0

2018

2020

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

61

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

HIGHWAY 276 ‐ NEW WATER MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  New water main will increase pressures and looping and will decrease the HGL. Location is Hwy 276 from White Horse Rd to Renfrew Rd; Renfrew Rd  to Hodgens Dr ending at Old White Horse Rd.  PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Significant improvement

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2018

          28,000         196,000

          29,000         201,000

2019

     1,309,000      1,342,000         328,000         335,000 $0 $1,861,000 $1,907,000

$0 COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2017

2016

$0

$0

2016

2017

2018

     1,861,000

     1,907,000

$1,861,000

2017

$0

$0                57,000              397,000                      ‐          2,651,000              663,000 $0 $3,768,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0          3,768,000                      ‐ $0 $3,768,000

2019

$1,907,000

2018

2020

2019

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

62

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

SE MAIN ST ‐ NEW WATER MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Fire Flow

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  New Water main is needed for fire flow capacity (addresses minimum 500 gpm fire flow). Location is SE Main St from W Curtis St to E Trade St

PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                   3,000                13,000                       ‐                87,000                22,000 $0 $125,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $125,000                       ‐                       ‐ $0 $125,000

              3,000             13,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

            87,000             22,000 $0 $125,000

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2016

2018 $125,000

$0

2017

2019

$125,000

2018

2019

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

63

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                       ‐                       ‐                       ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

MAIN ST ‐ REPLACE 24‐IN. MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Age/Condition 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Replacement of existing 24 in CI main. Location is from Rutherford Rd to Croft St. 

PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0               28,000             259,000                     ‐         1,730,000             433,000 $0 $2,450,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $2,450,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $2,450,000

          28,000         259,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

     1,730,000         433,000 $0 $2,450,000

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2016

2018 $2,450,000

$0

2017

2019

$2,450,000

2018

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

64

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

PINEFOREST DR ‐ NEW WATER MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The new water main will increase pressure and reduce HGL. Location is Pineforest Dr from Altamont Ter to Little Texas Rd, along Little Texas Rd to 12‐ inch WM; Parallel to a 8‐inch.  PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Significant improvement

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0

$0                25,000              124,000                       ‐              828,000              207,000 $0 $1,184,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0           1,184,000                       ‐ $0 $1,184,000

           25,000         124,000

$0 COMMITTED  FUNDING 

        828,000         207,000 $0 $1,184,000

$0

2016

2017

2018

2019

     1,184,000 $0

$0

2016

$0

2017

$1,184,000

2018

2019

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

65

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                       ‐                       ‐                       ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

PELHAM COMMONS BLVD ‐ NEW WATER MAIN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Part of the Zone Boundary Adjustment from Gravity to Lowndes. Location is Pelham Commons Blvd from Pelham Springs Pl to E North St, along E  North St to Rock Side Ct.  PROJECT STATUS  New METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0                 5,000               25,000                     ‐             162,000               41,000 $0 $233,000

             5,000           25,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2016

        162,000           41,000 $0 $233,000

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019 $233,000

$0

2018

$233,000

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $233,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $233,000

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

66

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

S. PARKER RD ‐ REPLACEMENT WATER MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Fire Flow 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  New Water main is needed for fire flow capacity (addresses cluster area). Location is S Parker Rd from US 25 BR to Cheviot Dr; Replacing a 6‐inch.  PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0                  4,000                23,000                      ‐             154,000                39,000 $0 $220,000

            4,000           23,000

$0 COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2016

        154,000           39,000 $0 $220,000

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019 $220,000

$0

2018

$220,000

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $220,000                      ‐                      ‐ $0 $220,000

2020

                 ‐

                ‐

                ‐

                ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                ‐

                ‐

                ‐

                  ‐

67

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

S. BUCKHORN RD ‐ REPLACEMENT WATER MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The new water main will increase pressure and reduce HGL. Location is S Buckhorn rd from State Park Rd to Coxe Dr. Replacing a 6‐inch. PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0                  3,000                16,000                       ‐              106,000                26,000 $0 $151,000

             3,000            16,000

$0 COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2016

        106,000            26,000 $0 $151,000

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019 $151,000

$0

2018

$151,000

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $151,000                       ‐                       ‐ $0 $151,000

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

68

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                       ‐                       ‐                       ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

TALLY BRIDGE RD ‐ NEW WATER MAIN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The new water main will increase pressures and looping PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Improves cluster pressures @ higher elevation. 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0               43,000             219,000                     ‐         1,459,000             365,000 $0 $2,086,000

          43,000         219,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2016

     1,459,000         365,000 $0 $2,086,000

$0

2018

$0

2017

2019 $2,086,000

$0

2018

$2,086,000

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $2,086,000                     ‐                     ‐ $0 $2,086,000

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

69

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

BATES CROSSING RD ‐ NEW WATER MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The new water main will reduce the HGL and increase flow to storage tanks; Replacing a 8‐inch. PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

$0                28,000              140,000                      ‐              932,000              233,000 $0 $1,333,000

          28,000         140,000

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

$0

2016

        932,000         233,000 $0 $1,333,000

$0

2017

2018

2019      1,333,000

$0

$0

2016

$0

2017

$0

2018

$1,333,000

2019

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $0          1,333,000                      ‐ $0 $1,333,000

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

70

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

MOORE RD ‐ REPLACEMENT WATER MAIN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Fire Flow

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  New water main will increase Pressure. Location is Moore Rd from Old Stage Rd to NE Main St. Replacing a 2‐inch. PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2017

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

2018

2019

$0

$0           23,000                23,000         116,000              116,000                      ‐         773,000              773,000         193,000              193,000 $0 $1,105,000 $1,105,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $1,105,000 $1,105,000                      ‐                      ‐ $1,105,000 $1,105,000

2018

$0

2017

2018

2020

2019

$0

2019

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

71

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

OLD WHITE HORSE RD ‐ REPLACEMENT MAIN  PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  New Water Main will increase pressures and decrease HGL. Location is Old White Horse Rd from Batson Rd to Roe Ford Rd. Replacing a 8‐inch.  PROJECT STATUS  New  METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  None 

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

$0 COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2017

$0

2016

$0

$0

2019

$0

2017

2018

2020

$0

$0           30,000                30,000         156,000              156,000                      ‐      1,035,000          1,035,000         259,000              259,000 $0 $1,480,000 $1,480,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $1,480,000 $1,480,000                      ‐                      ‐ $1,480,000 $1,480,000

2018

2017

$0

2016

2018

2019

$0

2019

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

72

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

GOODWIN BRIDGE RD ‐ NEW WATER MAIN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  The new water main will reduce the HGL and increase flow to the upper Pressure zones; Parallel to a 12‐inch PROJECT STATUS  New 

METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Significant improvement

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2017

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

2018

2019

$0

$0           34,000                34,000         169,000              169,000                      ‐      1,126,000          1,126,000         281,000              281,000 $0 $1,610,000 $1,610,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $1,610,000 $1,610,000                      ‐                      ‐ $1,610,000 $1,610,000

2018

$0

2017

2018

2020

2019

$0

2019

2020

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

73

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐

2016‐20 CIP 

WELLBORN RD TO SALUDA RIVER ‐ INSPECT 72‐IN TRANS MAIN PROJECT CATEGORY  PROJECT DRIVER

Mains  Capacity/Reliability 

PROJECT DETAILS AND JUSTIFICATION  Inspect 72" transmission main.

PROJECT STATUS  New METHOD FOR ESTMATING COST  Facilities Master Plan  SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS  Include inspection every 5 years as recommended by pipe line inspector.

PR0JECT COSTS  Land Acquistion Cost  Easements Planning/Legal/Engineering  Equipment  Construction/Improvements   Contingency  TOTAL PR0JECT COSTS 

PROJECT FINANCING Rates/Reserves  Capacity Fees  Revenue Bonds  TOTAL PROJECT FINANCING 

OPERATIONAL IMPACT  Net Operational Impact  Cumulative Operational Impact FTEs Added  Cumulative FTEs added

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2016

$0

COMMITTED  FUNDING 

2017

$0

2016

$0

$0

2017

$0

2016

2018

2018

2020

$0

$0                     ‐          169,000             169,000                     ‐       1,124,000         1,124,000          280,000             280,000 $0 $1,573,000 $1,573,000

$0

TOTAL  PROJECT  2020 FINANCING  $1,573,000 $1,573,000                     ‐                     ‐ $1,573,000 $1,573,000

2018

$0

2017

2019

2019

$0

2019

2020

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                 ‐

                  ‐

74

TOTAL  PROJECT  COST

TOTAL  OPERATIONAL  IMPACT $0                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐