SECTION 17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) CIP Overview Each biennium the District updates its six‐year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). New project requests and status updates on projects under construction, are prepared by the Engineering Services Department. As a member of the Joint Water Commission (JWC), the District also participates in the development of its budget, in which the City of Hillsboro serves as the managing agency. The JWC is a partnership of the District and the cities of Hillsboro, Beaverton and Forest Grove. The JWC operates treatment plant and related storage and transmission facilities. TVWD owns 12.5 million gallons per day (MGD) of capacity in the treatment plant and similar capacity in other JWC assets. The District also has a 35% ownership share in Barney Reservoir, one of the two primary impoundments (the other being Hagg Lake) providing raw surface water supply to the JWC. For capital asset accounting and financial reporting purposes, the JWC and Barney Reservoir operate as joint ventures with assets being held by JWC, and each member entity reflecting their respective ownership shares as investments in joint ventures. The Adopted 2015‐17 Budget and six‐year CIP include in‐District capital projects appropriated as capital outlay in the Capital Improvement Fund. Fleet replacements and facility projects are also budgeted in the Capital Improvement Fund. Appropriation for JWC projects is represented by a transfer to the General Fund and shown on the District’s balance sheet as investment in joint ventures. The District’s capitalization threshold for machinery, furniture, equipment or buildings is $7,500 and a life in excess of one year. Related to the Willamette Water Supply Program (WWSP) is a future need to include water supply projects in the in‐District CIP. These projects are identified in the District’s 2014 Master Plan, but are outside of the District’s Six‐Year CIP horizon. However, they will be added in future budgets to take full advantage of the efficiencies anticipated for the WWSP. One such in‐District project is a Willamette supply pipeline to serve the District’s Metzger service area by 2026. For a description of WWSP project activities that are contained in the Adopted 2015‐17 Budget see Section 16 Willamette Water Supply Program Fund. CIP Projected Expenditures, Categories, and Sources of Funding The table below displays the six‐year CIP for the Adopted 15‐17 Budget and projected out‐year expenditures. SIX YEAR CIP 2016‐2021 (in $ millions)
Project Category
FY 16 Adopted Budget
FY 17 Adopted Budget
Source: JWC/Joint Venture
$ 1.00
$ 0.59
$ 0.58
$ 2.50
$ 1.70
$ 0.20
$ 6.56
Source: TVWD
0.20
0.42
‐
‐
‐
‐
$ 0.62
Storage
7.52
‐
1.35
3.15
3.58
11.98
$ 27.58
Pump Stations
6.54
4.47
‐
‐
‐
‐
$ 11.01
Pipeline
5.46
3.35
7.63
4.89
5.26
5.23
$ 31.82
Facilities
0.25
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
$ 0.25
Fleet
0.58
0.33
0.54
0.56
0.58
0.59
$ 3.17
Meters & Services TOTAL
1.87 $ 23.42
1.96 $ 11.11
2.07 $ 12.17
2.15 $ 13.25
2.24 $ 13.34
2.33 $ 20.33
$ 12.61 $ 93.62
17 ‐ 1
FY 18 FY 18 FY 20 FY 21 Projected Projected Projected Projected
Total
District capital improvement projects are categorized in seven areas below. These project categories were first used during the 2013‐15 biennium to improve the tracking and transparency of CIP projects. For the Adopted 2015‐17 Budget Fleet Replacements have been added. Fleet was previously budgeted in the General Fund as capital outlay in the Field Operations Department. A. Source: Includes the development, upgrade or expansion of water supply resources, treatment, transmission and terminal storage. This category separately lists District source projects and those funded through TVWD’s joint venture partnership in the JWC. B. Storage: Upgrades, expansion, replacement, and repairs of reservoirs and related infrastructure. C. Pump Stations: Upgrades, expansion, replacement, and repairs of pump stations, and equipment such as motors, and monitoring systems. D. Pipeline: Upgrades, expansion, replacement, and repairs of water transmission lines and water distribution mains. E. Facilities: Includes security improvements at District facilities, equipment upgrades, and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) improvements. F. Fleet Replacements: Scheduled replacements and new vehicles, when requested, serving all District operating, maintenance and capital construction needs. The District fleet purchasing and maintenance is centrally managed by the Field Operations Department. G. Meters and Services: Includes new and replacement water service installations. New services are paid from separate fees and developer contributions. This category also includes the District’s 25‐ year program to replace all water meters with automated meter reading (AMR) devices. The chart below displays the CIP for the Adopted 13‐15 Budget and projected biennium‐end expenditures.
2013‐15 Capital Improvement Plan Adopted Budget to Projected $50.0 $45.0 $40.0
Source
In Millions
$35.0
Storage
$30.0 Pump Stations
$25.0 $20.0
Pipeline
$15.0
Facilities
$10.0
Meters & Services
$5.0 $0.0
Note: Legend aligns with bar chart categories - top to bottom
17 ‐ 2
Funding sources for the CIP are principally derived from water rates, system development charges (SDCs) for growth related projects, separate fees paid by customers and developers, and available fund balance. JWC Source CIP projects reflect the District’s proportionate share of cost based on its ownership share of the project. The Adopted 2015‐17 Budget also includes one project – Cornelius Pass Intertie Improvements – that will be constructed on behalf of the City of Hillsboro. The District will manage the project, with Hillsboro paying 100% of the project costs. Three other pipeline and facility projects in the CIP include cost shares from District partners. Most CIP projects are eligible to be financed with revenue bonded debt and the District has reimbursement authority as permitted under federal law to issue revenue bonds to reimburse for certain capital projects. A determination will be made during the 2015‐17 biennium on the timing for future revenue bond issues to finance both District‐only capital projects and the District’s share of projects for the WWSP. CIP Development Process, Prioritization and Individual Project Pages As investments in the District’s water system infrastructure and future water supply take on increasing importance in terms of their financial requirements, the District continues to refine and enhance its CIP development process. The Engineering Services Department leads a cross‐departmental team to develop the CIP using a deliberate approach to select and prioritize projects, and confirm the financial feasibility of the CIP with available and projected resources. Key inputs included the District’s 2014 Water Master Plan, JWC capital requirements, and projects identified as necessary for service reliability, seismic resiliency, and replacement of aging infrastructure. The graphic below illustrates the District’s CIP development process: Four Step CIP Development Process
Identify Projects
•Ongoing •New
Scoring
•Criteria •Shift based on score
Consider Initiative Priorities
•Develop Initial Preferred Package
Finalize
•Review with Finance •Review with CEO
1.
Identify Projects Project identification involved selecting both ongoing CIP projects funded but not completed during the 2013‐15 biennium, and new projects determined as critical to the District’s water system. One such project in construction – The Ridgewood View Park Reservoir and Pump Station will be completed early in the 2015‐17 biennium. The reservoir replaces the District’s Hyde Park Reservoir at the same location, which was taken out of service due to a structural failure. The new pump station provides service reliability for the West Hills including critical customers such as a major hospital. Both projects improve the District’s seismic resiliency and include sustainable design features. Project identification also considered the seismic vulnerability and reliability of other critical water system assets, water main replacement needs, and projects performed by in‐house District staff such 17 ‐ 3
2.
3.
as smaller pipeline projects, meter installations based on projected customer growth and the District’s continued 25‐year program to retrofit all existing meters with automated meter reading devices, and water main replacement needs. A key financial consideration in developing the CIP for the Adopted 2015‐17 Budget is balancing in‐ District capital improvements with the current and future requirements of the WWSP Program. The District’s financial planning assumptions for the capital needs of the WWSP are covered in more detail in Section 5 – Multi‐Year Financial Outlook. Scoring and Ranking Criteria Each CIP project was scored and ranked in accordance to the criteria shown below: Criteria Ranking Considerations Mandated projects (e.g. external commitments to partners) time sensitive, 1. Project Criticality ongoing projects Service to critical customers such as hospitals & industries, projects that 2. Customers Served affect large portions of customer base Growth/Future 3. Expand services and facilities to meet anticipated growth/water demand Demands 4. Water Quality Current and anticipated water quality regulatory requirements Aging Replacement of aging infrastructure including known deficiencies, and the 5. Infrastructure installation pipelines with improved soil corrosion control protection Seismic resiliency, reliability of service, redundancy in water system 6. Reliability distribution operations Public and private fire protection, facility security enhancements, worker 7. Safety & Security safety (e.g. confirmed spaces) Improvements to distribution system to reduce pumping requirements, 8. Cost Effectiveness horizontal directional drilling to reduce surface street repair and repaving Consideration of impacts to natural environment, mitigate construction 9. Environment impacts to public, incorporate environmentally preferable sustainability elements in projects Higher scored projects were prioritized as either critical or near‐term, mid‐term, or long‐term. All projects were placed on a long‐term CIP schedule with cost estimates corresponding to their place on the schedule. “Key drivers” representing the top three of the nine evaluation criteria were assigned to the list of projects considered for the six‐year CIP. Consider Board Key Initiatives This step involved developing a prioritized preferred in‐District CIP project in light of the Board’s Key Initiatives that pertain to capital projects. Two initiatives served as the primary focus for the selection of projects. 1. Develop & Implement Aging Infrastructure Strategy 2. Develop & Implement District Resiliency Policy & Program
These initiatives are not new to the District. Upgrades and replacements of aging infrastructure and constructing storage, pumping, and pipeline assets to current standards for seismic resiliency have been an ongoing objective of the District for many years. What is new, however, is with the 2014 Master Plan update, new analysis was used to define existing water system vulnerabilities leading to the inclusion of achieving different level of service goals based on the criticality of the asset. This analysis helps to further prioritize projects. 17 ‐ 4
4. Internal Review and Adopted CIP The preferred CIP is reviewed internally by Finance and the Chief Executive Officer, analyzed with the financial forecast and other District requirements such as the WWSP and updated in accordance to the direction provided by the CEO. The CIP is then reviewed by the Budget Committee and Board of Commissioners during the regular budget development and public review process.
Initial CIP
Initial Financial Forecast
Preferred CIP/Internal Review
Revised CIP Updated Forecast
Proposed CIP
All projects included in the Adopted Six‐Year CIP are presented in detail beginning on page 17‐11. Each project sheet includes a map, the three key drivers based on the highest ranking criteria, a description, project information including category and project manager, funding sources, and an assessment of the future operating costs impacts. As applicable, the project descriptions also include a discussion on environmental/sustainability elements that will be incorporated into design and construction. Project budget information is listed for the 2013‐15 biennium, the Adopted 2015‐17 Budget, the following four year timeframe, and, if needed for those projects included in the six‐year CIP, future year requirements. Six‐Year CIP and 2015‐17 Biennium Budget The FY 2016 to FY 2021 projected six‐year CIP totals an inflation‐adjusted $93,624,215. The largest components of the TVWD’s in‐District capital program over the next several years include infrastructure improvements to replace aging infrastructure, enhance service reliability and perform seismic upgrades of critical facilities. The District’s long‐term investment in developing a new water supply on the Willamette River in partnership with the City of Hillsboro is addressed in Section 16 Willamette Water Supply Program Fund. While the WWSP is in progress the TVWD will continue to address in‐District capital improvement needs. However, to balance resource allocation for the WWSP projects it is anticipated the in‐District capital budget will be reduced as many critical needs have already been addressed or are under construction. The largest group of in‐District CIP expenditures includes projects in the pipeline category, particularly the District’s ongoing mains replacement program and fire flow improvements identified by the District’s 2014 Master Plan update. In addition, several storage and pump station projects are identified in the six‐year CIP including finishing the 8.0 million gallon (MG) Ridgewood View Park Reservoir Pump and Station, which began construction in late 2014. Replacement reservoirs and upgrades are identified for the District’s Taylors Ferry and Grabhorn sites. A new Rosander Pump Station and 1.0 MG reservoir will improve service level reliability for existing
17 ‐ 5
customers in the West Hills area of the District and serve new development. The Rosander projects will be partially funded by system development charges. In total, expenditures in the amount of $70.4 million are identified in the six‐year CIP for these pipeline, storage, and pump station projects. The remaining appropriations in the CIP principally are for ongoing meter and service installations paid through separate customer fees, the District’s on‐going program to retrofit existing meters with automated meter reading (AMR) capability, and scheduled fleet replacements. (Fleet has moved from a General Fund Capital Outlay budgeted item to the Capital Improvement Fund effective with the Adopted 2015‐17 Budget. The chart below the shows appropriations by project category for the six‐year CIP.
CIP Appropriations in the Adopted 2015‐17 Budget Appropriations for the first two years of the CIP are incorporated in the Adopted 2015‐17 Budget and, with the exception of JWC joint venture projects, are reflected as capital outlay in the Capital Improvement Fund. The budget includes appropriation of $34,530,152 in total in‐District CIP activity, with $32,945,807 shown as Capital Improvement Fund capital outlay, and $1,584,345 represented as a transfer from the Capital Improvement Fund to the General Fund for JWC projects. Key projects for this upcoming biennium include the following: A. Source Category • JWC Joint Venture (existing facilities): $366K • JWC Treatment Plant Expansion Design $468K • Miller Hill Road ASR (project substantially completed during 2013‐15): $100K 17 ‐ 6
B. Storage Category • Ridgewood View Park Reservoir: $7.52MM C. Pump Station Category • Ridgewood View Park Pump Station: $6.1MM • Rosander Pump Station: $4.91MM D. Pipeline Category • 185th and Springville (Washington County Project): $656K • Lincoln Center Main Replacement: $800K • Bridle Hills Water System Improvements: $900K • Pipeline Upgrades and Renewals: $977K • Mains Replacement Program (outside contractors): $1.13MM • Mains Replacement Program (District crews): $2.24MM • Anode Retrofit Program (District crews): $408K E. Facilities Category • Washington County Emergency Pump Station Storage Facility: $150K • Radio Equipment Building and Generator Replacement: $100K F. Fleet Replacements • Scheduled Replacements and new vehicles (see page 17‐47): $909K G. Meters and Services Category • Ongoing program for the installation of water meters for new and existing residential and commercial customers: $3.0MM • Automated Meter Reading (AMR) program: $796K The remainder of this section provides both summary information and the individual project pages on the District’s Adopted 2015‐17 Budget and six‐year Capital Improvement Plan.
17 ‐ 7
TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2015‐2017 BIENNIAL BUDGET ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BY PROJECT CATEGORY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND (Fund 11)
A. Source Category Expected Uses of Funds Joint Water Commission (JWC) Joint Venture JWC Capital Projects JWC Treatment Plant Expansion JWC/WTP Standby Power JWC Equipment Replacement Subtotal Joint Water Commission Joint Venture (Note 1) Expected Uses of Funds TVWD Source Miller Hill Road Aquifer Storage & Recovery Well (ASR) Cornelius Pass Facility Intertie Improvements
$366,195 $468,000 $416,750 $333,400 $1,584,345
Subtotal TVWD
$100,000 $516,000 $616,000
Total Source
$2,200,345
Total Storage
$7,520,000 $7,520,000
Total Pump Stations
$6,100,000 $4,912,000 $11,012,000
Total Pipeline
$340,000 $655,500 $800,000 $130,000 $100,000 $900,000 $1,132,000 $976,500 $2,244,000 $408,000 $235,000 $250,000 $250,000 $286,000 $102,000 $8,809,000
B. Storage Category Expected Uses of Funds: Ridgewood View Park Reservoir
C. Pump Station Category Expected Uses of Funds: Ridgewood View Park Pump Station Rosander Pump Station
D. Pipeline Category Expected Uses of Funds: Sequoia Village 18" Transmission Line 185th and Springville (Washington County Road Project) Lincoln Center Main Replacement Maplewood Heights Line Upsizing SW Hocken Ave at Beaverton Creek 12" Replacement Bridle Hills Water System Improvements Pipelines Upgrades and Renewals (Agency Driven) Mains Replacement Program (Outside Contract) Mains Replacement Program (District Crews) Anode Retrofit Program (District Crews) Cooper Mtn ASR to 385 Backdown Pressure Relief Valves (PRV) Farmington Road Pressure Sustaining Valve (PSV) for ASR Recharge 385 Pressure Zone Pressure Relief Valve for ASR Recharge St. Vincent Meter Vault Distribution Water Quality Sample Stations
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 8
TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2015‐2017 BIENNIAL BUDGET ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BY PROJECT CATEGORY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND (Fund 11) E. Facilities Category Expected Uses of Funds: Washington County Supply Line Emergency Pump Station Trailer Storage Facility Radio Equipment Building & Generator Replacement Total Facilities
$150,000 $100,000 $250,000
Total Facilities
$908,750 $908,750
Total Meter & Service Installations
2,577,400 456,657 796,000 $3,830,057
F. Fleet Category Expected Uses of Funds: Fleet Replacement (Per Schedule) F. Meter and Service Installations Expected Uses of Funds Service Installations ‐ Field Operations Meters Installations ‐ Field Customer Service Automated Meter Reading Program (AMR)
Total 2015‐17 Construction Fund Expenditures and Transfers
$34,530,152
Note 1: JWC Joint Venture Projects shown as a transfer to the General Fund for budgetary purposes
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 9
Tualatin Valley Water District Six-Year CIP Planned Expenditures (2016-2021)
PROJECT TITLE SOURCE: JOINT WATER COMMISSION (JWC) JWC Capital Projects JWC Treatment Plant Expansion JWC/WTP Standby Power JWC Equipment Replacement TOTAL SOURCE: JWC
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
178,695 68,000 416,750 333,400 996,845
187,500 400,000 ‐ ‐ 587,500
200,000 380,000 ‐ ‐ 580,000
200,000 2,300,000 ‐ ‐ 2,500,000
200,000 1,500,000 ‐ ‐ 1,700,000
200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 200,000
1,166,195 4,648,000 416,750 333,400 6,564,345
SOURCE: TVWD Miller Hill Road Aquifer Storage & Recovery Well (ASR) Cornelius Pass Facility Intertie Improvements TOTAL SOURCE: TVWD
100,000 ‐ ‐ 100,000 416,000 ‐ 200,000 416,000 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
100,000 ‐ 516,000 ‐ 616,000 ‐
STORAGE: TVWD Ridgewood View Park Reservoir Taylor's Ferry No. 2 Reservoir Grabhorn Reservoir No. 2 Rosander Reservoir Taylor's Ferry 2.3 MG Steel Tank Seismic Upgrade TOTAL STORAGE: TVWD
7,520,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,520,000
‐ 3,149,619 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,149,619
‐ ‐ 2,421,607 701,915 452,150 3,575,672
‐ ‐ 6,764,590 2,554,971 2,660,212 11,979,773
7,520,000 4,501,619 9,186,197 3,256,886 3,112,362 27,577,064
PUMP STATIONS: TVWD Ridgewood View Park Pump Station Rosander Pump Station TOTAL PUMP STATIONS TVWD
6,100,000 ‐ ‐ 440,000 4,472,000 ‐ 6,540,000 4,472,000 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
6,100,000 ‐ 4,912,000 ‐ 11,012,000 ‐
PIPELINE: TVWD Sequoia Village 18" Transmission Line 185th and Springville (Washington County Road Project) Lincoln Center Main Replacement Maplewood Heights Line Upsizing SW Hocken Ave at Beaverton Creek 12" Replacement Bridle Hills Water System Improvements Pipelines Upgrades and Renewals (Agency Driven) Mains Replacement Program (Outside Contract) Mains Replacement Program (District Crews) Anode Retrofit Program (District Crews) Fire Flow Improvements (Master Plan) Metzger North‐South Transmission Line Cooper Mtn ASR to 385 Backdown Pressure Relief Valves (PRV) Farmington Road Pressure Sustaining Valve (PSV) for ASR Recharge 385 Pressure Zone Pressure Relief Valve for ASR Recharge St. Vincent Meter Vault Distribution Water Quality Sample Stations TOTAL PIPELINE: TVWD
340,000 655,500 800,000 130,000 100,000 900,000 144,500 300,000 1,100,000 200,000 ‐ ‐ 235,000 250,000 250,000 ‐ 50,000 5,455,000
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 865,280 865,280 1,189,760 216,320 1,514,240 2,930,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 54,080 7,634,960
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 899,891 899,891 1,237,350 224,973 1,574,810 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 56,243 4,893,158
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 935,887 935,887 1,286,844 233,972 1,637,802 ‐ 224,613 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,255,005
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 973,322 973,322 1,338,318 243,331 1,703,314 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,231,607
340,000 655,500 800,000 130,000 100,000 900,000 4,650,880 4,806,380 7,296,272 1,326,596 6,430,166 2,930,000 459,613 250,000 250,000 286,000 212,323 31,823,730
‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐
150,000 ‐ 100,000 ‐ 250,000 ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 832,000 832,000 1,144,000 208,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 286,000 52,000 3,354,000
FACILITIES: TVWD Washington County Supply Line Emergency Pump Station Trailer Sto 150,000 ‐ Radio Equipment Building & Generator Replacement 100,000 ‐ TOTAL FACILITIES: TVWD 250,000 ‐
‐ 1,352,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,352,000
Six Year Total Future Years 7,300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,300,000
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15,200,000 24,000,000 15,000,000 2,000,000 63,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 119,200,000
FLEET: TVWD Fleet Replacements (per schedule) TOTAL FLEET: TVWD
581,700 327,050 540,000 560,000 575,000 590,000 3,173,750 1,270,000 581,700 327,050 540,000 560,000 575,000 590,000 3,173,750 1,270,000
METERS AND SERVICES: TVWD Service Installations ‐ Field Operations Meters Installations ‐ Field Customer Service Automated Meter Reading Program (AMR) TOTAL METERS AND SERVICES: TVWD
1,278,100 214,420 380,000 1,872,520
TOTAL CIP
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
1,299,300 242,237 416,000 1,957,537
1,382,393 251,926 432,640 2,066,959
1,437,689 262,003 449,946 2,149,638
1,495,196 272,483 467,943 2,235,622
1,555,004 283,383 486,661 2,325,048
8,447,682 1,526,452 2,633,190 12,607,324
‐ ‐ 8,500,000 8,500,000
23,416,065 11,114,087 12,173,919 13,252,415 13,341,299 20,326,428 93,624,213 136,270,000
17 ‐ 10
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
JWC Capital Projects
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Maintains supply for multiple water supply partners.
2.
Aging Infrastructure
Key equipment and facilities require upgrades or replacement to ensure plant operations.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable supply.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Joint Water Commission (JWC) CIP projects which includes miscellaneous upgrades to facilities, pump reconditioning, the installation of flow meters, and demolition of a soda ash silo.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
JWC
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
Joint Venture Joint Venture Chief Engineer Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% Yes 83%
Costs for JWC operations are passed through to JWC partners based on ownership shares and water purchases. Most capital projects will not have a significant operating cost impact. The District includes projected JWC increases in its Purchased Water budget, estimated to increase about 4.5% annually.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
407,748 165,000 178,695 187,500 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,166,195 7,300,000
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 11
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
JWC Treatment Plant Expansion
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Maintains supply for multiple water supply partners.
2.
Growth/Future Demands
Plant expansion increases production to meet growing demands cost effectively.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable supply.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project will begin the design of the WTP expansion. There will be several key components of this design: 1) Return the WTP to its rated capacity of 75 MGD; 2) Expand the capacity from 75 to 85 MGD. Hillsboro share ‐ 8 MGD and TVWD share up to 2 MGD; 3) Design life safety improvements; 4) Perform a facility plan update for the proposed long term build‐out of the WTP based on the decision by some partners to obtain additional supply from a second source (Willamette Water Supply). The preliminary design and facility plan update will start in late FY 15‐16. Expansion is expected to be complete in approximately 2020.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
JWC
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
Joint Venture Joint Venture Chief Engineer Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No Yes 10% Yes 80%
To be determined. Operating cost impact will depend on outcome of timing and final partnership shares of the expanded plant. If required, future JWC partner budgets will include any incremental operating and maintenance cost increases.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
51,000 26,000 68,000 400,000 380,000 2,300,000 1,500,000 ‐ 4,648,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 12
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
JWC/WTP Standby Power
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Maintains supply for multiple water supply partners.
2.
Customers Served
Provides a redundant power supply to treatment plant to provide greater level of service to customers.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable supply.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is to construct a diesel backup power facility. Construction started during FY 2014‐15 and is expected to be completed during FY 2015‐ 16. The project adds backup power to meet the needs of a minimum of 50 percent production of current peak plant capacity (75 MGD). The project has contracted to participate in the Dispatchable Standby Generation (DSG) program with Portland General Electric, which includes a grant of $1.3 million from PGE.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
JWC
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
Joint Venture Joint Venture Chief Engineer Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% Yes 83%
Additional operating costs associated with this project will be included in the FY 2016‐17 budget after the project comes on line. The District includes projected JWC increases in its Purchased Water budget, estimated to increase about 4.5% annually.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
666,800 585,000 416,750 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 416,750 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 13
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
JWC Equipment Replacement
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Maintains supply for multiple water supply partners.
2.
Customers Served
Reserves funds to ensure continuity of service in the event of unanticipated maintenance or equipment repair needs.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable supply.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project funds a reserve for unanticipated capital expenses for the Joint Water Commission partners. Reserve funds are allocated based on ownership shares of Joint Water Commission facilities, of which the District is a 16.67% owner. Establishment of the reserve provides resources to the JWC in the event of unplanned capital expenditure needs. Use of the reserve requires approval by all JWC partners including the District.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
JWC
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
Joint Venture Joint Venture Chief Engineer Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% Yes 83%
No anticipated material impact
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
333,400 ‐ 333,400 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 333,400 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 14
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Miller Hill Road Aquifer Storage & Recovery Well (ASR)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Customers Served
Provides a separate, redundant source to customers on Cooper Mountain.
2.
Growth/Future Demands
New ASR increases summer production capacity to meet demands cost effectively.
3.
Reliability
Increases overall reliability by providing a new summer supply source within the District.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project includes a new 2 MGD ASR facility located on Cooper Mountain to provide additional storage and supply to meet peak summer demands. It is the second TVWD ASR facility, joining the Grabhorn ASR that has been in operation for four years. Sustainability considerations for this project include the provisions for energy recovery during the recharge phase of operations. This is a newly available technology that may result in significant energy savings. The project was substantially completed near the end of the 2013‐15 biennium and will be placed in operation during the summer of 2016.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
Source
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
11‐30‐01‐8502 C12414 Pete Boone Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No Yes 85% No 0%
This project will result in increased maintenance and monitoring costs of approximately $10,000/yr. Increased power is $25,000 to $50,000 /yr. Offsetting these costs will be the need to purchase water for summer peak demand from other sources.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
5,072,000 4,992,000 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 15
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Cornelius Pass Facility Intertie Improvements
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Provides an emergency backup flow source for critical customer.
2.
Growth/Future Demands
Allows / supports additional growth.
3.
Safety/Security
Improves system reliability for Hillsboro system.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION On behalf of the City of Hillsboro this project includes an additional pressure sustaining valve at the District's Cornelius Pass pump station that would allow water to be wheeled from TVWD to Hillsboro through the north transmission line. Approximately 10 MGD can be provided to Hillsboro in an emergency. TVWD will budget and construct this project. It will be 100% reimbursable by the City of Hillsboro.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
Source
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
11‐30‐01‐8502 TBD TBD Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% Yes 100%
No anticipated impact on District operating costs
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 100,000 416,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 516,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 16
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Ridgewood View Park Reservoir
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Continued development of replacement infrastructure that provides service to key parts of the District's system and critical customers in the 435 pressure zone.
2.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of aging / out‐of‐service infrastructure to provide new resilient structures capable of providing long‐term, reliable service.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of the Hyde Park 5 MG Reservoir with new, seismically resilient 8 MG Ridgewood View Park Reservoir. Project is currently under construction. This project also involves working closely with the Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District to refurbish park facilities affected by the reservoir construction. Project includes sustainability in the design and development through the use of EnvisionTM sustainable infrastructure rating system. Projected spending for the project during 2013‐15 is ahead of schedule. Fewer resources are required to be budgeted in 2015‐17 with an anticipated completion date of mid‐2016.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
Storage
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
11‐30‐01‐8505 C12372 Nick Augustus Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No Yes 35% No 0%
This replacement reservoir will result in a net 3 million gallon increase in storage and a net increase in operation costs of approximately $12,000/yr.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
9,800,000 10,800,000 7,520,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,520,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 17
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Taylor's Ferry No. 2 Reservoir
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Will provide seismically resilient storage in Metzger 498 pressure zone.
2.
Growth/Future Demands
Will provide additional storage required to accommodate projected growth in the Metzger service area.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable supply.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning, design, permitting, and construction of a new 2.0 MG pre‐stressed concrete reservoir at Taylor's Ferry to replace the existing 1.0 MG reservoir.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
Storage
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
11‐30‐01‐8505 TBD TBD Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 25% No 0%
Replaces existing concrete reservoir with lower maintenance concrete reservoir. By increasing the size and improving the tank, future maintenance costs are expected to remain the same. Grounds maintenance needs are also anticipated to be unchanged.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,352,000 3,149,619 ‐ ‐ 4,501,619 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 18
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Grabhorn Reservoir No. 2
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Provides storage redundancy for the aging Grabhorn 5 MG reservoir, and adds storage to the 385 pressure zone, which is deficient.
2.
Aging Infrastructure
Addition of new resilient structure capable of providing long‐term, reliable service.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project involves the design and construction of a new 3 million gallon (MG) reservoir to provide additional storage in the 385 pressure zone and supplement the existing Grabhorn Reservoir. The existing 5 MG Grabhorn Reservoir has structural deficiencies will be replaced after this new reservoir is constructed. No other viable replacement sites were found leaving the existing site as the location for the replacement reservoir. Development of this site is expected to require extensive rock excavation to prepare the site for a new reservoir. Sustainability elements associated with this project could be the potential addition of solar panels to offset purchase of energy for the adjacent ASR facilities.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
Storage
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
11‐30‐01‐8505 TBD TBD Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Yes No Yes 35% No 0%
Adds new reservoir resulting in increased future maintenance costs of approximately $12,000 per year. Grounds maintenance needs anticipated to be decreased due to the area taken up the by new reservoir.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,421,607 6,764,590 9,186,197 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 19
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Rosander Reservoir
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Adds critical storage for the 575 pressure zone, which has long‐term deficiencies.
2.
Growth/Future Demands
Will provide storage to meet future growth.
3.
Safety/Security
Reservoir will be upgraded to current seismic standards.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project will construct a new, 1 million gallon (MG) pre‐stressed concrete reservoir in the vicinity of the Rosander Pump Station.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
Storage
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
11‐30‐01‐8505 TBD TBD Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No Yes 25% No 0%
This replacement reservoir will result in a net one million increase in storage and a net increase in operation costs of approximately $4,000/year for inspections and grounds maintenance.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 701,915 2,554,971 3,256,886 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 20
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Taylor's Ferry 2.3 MG Steel Tank Seismic Upgrade
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Extends life of reservoir and provided seismic stability.
2.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of aging infrastructure to provide new resilient structures capable of providing long‐term, reliable service.
3.
Safety/Security
Reservoir will be constructed to current seismic standards.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design and Construction of a seismic upgrade, roof replacement, and new interior and exterior coatings for the 2.3 MG steel tank.
PROJECT INFORMATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Project Category:
Storage
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
11‐30‐01‐8505 TBD TBD Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No material impact. Future maintenance costs may decrease with the new roof and protective coatings.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 452,150 2,660,212 3,112,362 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 21
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Ridgewood View Park Pump Station
Map to be Added
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Critical to maintaining seismic resiliency to pump water to the West Hills area and critical customers.
2.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of aging infrastructure with new state‐of‐the‐art facilities capable of providing long‐term service.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of the Inglewood Pump Station with new, seismically resilient 11 MGD Ridgewood View Park Pump Station. Project is currently under construction. This pump station is adjacent to the Ridgewood View Park Reservoir. Elements include drilled micropiles for foundation support, below grade concrete structure, above grade masonry, 5 vertical turbine pumps, overhead crane rail, electrical equipment, 550 kW emergency generator, and 7,000 LF of 24" welded steel pipeline. Includes sustainable design features and will be submitted as an EnvisionTM sustainable infrastructure project for certification.
FUNDING SOURCES
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category:
Pump Station
General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
11‐30‐01‐8506 C12373 Nick Augustus Outside Contract
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
This new pump station replaces the existing Inglewood Pump Station at Ridgewood View Park resulting in a net no material impact to operating costs. Power costs may increase slightly due from a lower elevation.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
9,800,000 7,400,000 6,100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,100,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 22
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Rosander Pump Station
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Adds redundancy to the West Hills pumping system.
2.
Growth/Future Demands
Provides pumping capacity to meet the demands of the projected growth in the West Hills area.
3.
Safety/Security
Pump Station will have secured access and be a seismically resilient facility.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design, and construction of new Rosander Pump Station and 1,400 ft. of 24" discharge line to connect to existing 12" and 16" transmission lines near SW 84th.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pump Station 11‐30‐01‐8506 C12358 Pete Boone Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No Yes 25% No 0%
This new pump station replaces the existing Sunset Pump Station resulting in a net no material impact to operating costs. Power costs may decrease slightly due to increase pumping efficiency.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
580,000 290,000 440,000 4,472,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,912,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 23
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Sequoia Village 18" Transmission Line
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of aging infrastructure to provide new resilient pipeline capable of providing long‐term, reliable service.
2.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development of property at northeast corner of intersection of SW Cornelius Pass Road and SW Baseline Road will result in the need to move the existing 18‐inch ductile iron water line (located in the old alignment of Cornelius Pass Road). The northerly portion of this line will be the responsibility of the developer because of interference with a building pad (immediately south of the new Shaleen Street that runs east across the property). North of the new street the existing line will be too close to footings of the proposed townhomes. Installation of approximately 1085 lineal feet of 18‐inch DIP is required. Of this length, 365 lineal feet is the responsibility of the developer and the remaining 720 lineal feet is TVWD's responsibility. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 TBD Ryan Smith Outside Contract
Yes No No 0% Yes 33%
No anticipated impact on District operating costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 340,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 340,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 24
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
185th and Springville (Washington County Road Project)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Project required due to County road configuration.
2.
Reliability
Improvements will provide greater seismic resilience.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is being constructed in conjunction with a Washington County road project and will replace approximately 1400 feet of 16" ductile iron. Project location: NW 185th Ave., from Chemeketa Ln. to 350 ft. north of Springville and NW Springville Rd., from 185th to 173rd Ave. The County road project requires the existing pipeline be moved. It is also an opportunity to replace older infrastructure with new pipeline installed with restrained joints for seismic resilience.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 TBD Kevin Schmeltzer Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No anticipated impact on District operating costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 655,500 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 655,500 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 25
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Lincoln Center Main Replacement
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Completing ongoing work that is under design. Replaces pipe that runs under building.
2.
Aging Infrastructure
Remove District liability to property damage by upgrading infrastructure
3.
Cost Effectiveness
Addresses long‐standing pipe alignment issue and maintenance responsibility.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of the existing corroded on‐site piping within the Lincoln Center Business Center. A portion of the piping runs under the main tower's enclosed lobby area. Once the piping is replaced, ownership will be handed over to the current property owner. Project is currently under design.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 C12429 Ryan Smith Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No anticipated impact on District operating costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
172,000 102,000 800,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 800,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 26
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Maplewood Heights Line Upsizing
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Completing ongoing work that is under construction.
2.
Aging Infrastructure
Construction of new resilient facilities to supplement older ones.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maplewood Heights is an eleven‐lot subdivision that would normally require an 8‐inch pipe to serve the subdivision. TVWD has requested the developer to upsize 1,200 linear feet of 8‐inch to a 12‐inch pipe to better serve the adjacent neighborhoods. TVWD’s participation in the project is the actual cost difference in materials between the 8‐inch and 12‐inch pipes.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 C12326 Ryan Smith Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% Yes 75%
No anticipated impact on District operating costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
120,000 5,000 130,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 130,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 27
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
SW Hocken Ave at Beaverton Creek 12" Replacement
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Completing ongoing work that is under design.
2.
Customers Served
Maintains water service for large commercial users in the area.
3.
Reliability
New pipeline will be cathodically protected and have seismically resilient restrained joints.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project consists of the relocation and abandonment of an existing pipe that need to be addressed due to the City of Beaverton's Hocken Avenue Bridge Replacement project. Contractors under contact with City of Beaverton will install two portions of pipeline and reconnect the pipe to the District's existing system.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 C12422 Ryan Smith Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No anticipated impact on District operating costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
75,000 83,000 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 28
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Bridle Hills Water System Improvements
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Remove District liability to property damage caused by future main breaks.
2.
Customers Served
Upgrade water mains in the neighborhood where found to be undersized.
3.
Reliability
Improvements will provide greater seismic resilience.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is for the replacement of existing corroded piping within the Bridle Hills neighborhood. There have been a number of water main breaks throughout this neighborhood over the last few years. Beaverton is scheduled to pave streets in this neighborhood in early 2016. The District will replace the older pipelines prior to the paving work.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 C12451 Nick Augustus Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No anticipated impact on District operating costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
800,000 87,000 900,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 900,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 29
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Pipelines Upgrades and Renewals (Agency Driven)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Upgrades or renewal work to the District's system that develop in response to new projects by Washington County, developers, for based on other needs.
2.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of aging infrastructure to provide new resilient structures capability of providing long‐term, reliable service.
3.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This is a general category that allows for various pipeline upgrades and replacements typically associated with miscellaneous Washington County projects, projects related to development or other needs.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 Various Kevin Schmeltzer Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No material impact. New installations designed for site specific corrosion conditions resulting in longer expected design life of pipeline and reduced leakage for system.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
1,125,000 1,700,000 144,500 832,000 865,280 899,891 935,887 973,322 4,650,880 15,200,000
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 30
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Mains Replacement Program (Outside Contract)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of aging infrastructure to provide new resilient pipelines capable of providing long‐term, reliable service.
2.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This work includes projects that are completed as part of the District's Mains Replacement Program. This program is a focused effort to identify, prioritize, design and install projects based on asset management principles to replace existing failing infrastructure. The majority of these projects will be water main replacements that are required due to corrosion of the existing water mains. Improvements will result in improved reliability and water quality as well as reduced liability associated with premature pipe failures and leaks.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 Various Ryan Smith Outside Contract
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No material impact. New installations designed for site specific corrosion conditions resulting in longer expected design life of pipeline and reduced leakage for system.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
1,150,000 385,000 300,000 832,000 865,280 899,891 935,887 973,322 4,806,380 24,000,000
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 31
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Mains Replacement Program (District Crews)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of aging infrastructure to provide new resilient structures capability of providing long‐term, reliable service.
2.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This work includes projects that are completed as part of the District's Mains Replacement Program. Work is performed by TVWD crews in the Field Operations Department. The Improvements will result in improved reliability and water quality as well as reduced liability associated with premature pipe failures and leaks.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐40‐42‐8504 Various Ryan Smith District Staff
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No material impact. New installations designed for site specific corrosion conditions resulting in longer expected design life of pipeline and reduced leakage for system.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
3,450,000 1,700,000 1,100,000 1,144,000 1,189,760 1,237,350 1,286,844 1,338,318 7,296,272 15,000,000
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 32
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Anode Retrofit Program (District Crews)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Slow the failure rate of pipes installed in corrosive soils
2.
Cost Effectiveness
Extends the life of existing assets to mitigate future pipe replacement costs.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This program's goal is to slow the failure rate of pipes which were historically installed in corrosive soils and to avoid premature replacement. Anodes are installed to protect metallic pipelines from corrosion.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐40‐42‐8504 TBD TBD District Staff
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
The Anode Retrofit Program is anticipated to reduce premature pipeline failures due to corrosive soils thereby reducing future maintenance and repair costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 200,000 208,000 216,320 224,973 233,972 243,331 1,326,596 2,000,000
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 33
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Fire Flow Improvements (Master Plan)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Critical for fire flow and service levels for public safety and critical customers.
2.
Growth/Future Demands
Will provide capacity to meet future growth.
3.
Safety / Security
Improves fire flow capabilities
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This capital program includes multiple pipeline projects that were recommended in the 2014 Master Plan to improve fire flow at various locations throughout the District. Staff will work to prioritize these projects and complete them during the upcoming six‐year CIP period.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 TBD Pete Boone Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No TBD TBD No 0%
To be determined. Operating cost impact will depend on specific details associated with the project. Pipelines will be constructed to District standards for seismic and corrosion protection, which are intended to reduce future maintenance costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,514,240 1,574,810 1,637,802 1,703,314 6,430,166 63,000,000
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 34
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Metzger North‐South Transmission Line
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Critical for fire flow and service levels for public safety and critical customers.
2.
Growth/Future Demands
Will provide capacity to meet future growth.
3.
Safety / Security
Improves fire flow capabilities
PROJECT DESCRIPTION The District needs to make various fire flow improvements based on the recent 2014 Master Plan. This project is included in the list of recommended improvements. The project also provides a resiliency function to Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue facilities and a key commercial area. The area being served expects further growth and development in future years. The project is estimated to include the installation of 6,000 feet of 18" transmission line.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 TBD Pete Boone Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No Yes 30% No 0%
No material impact. New installations designed for site specific corrosion conditions resulting in longer expected design life of pipeline and reduced leakage for system.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,930,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,930,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 35
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Cooper Mtn ASR to 385 Backdown Pressure Relief Valves (PRV)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Miller Hill Road ASR supplies water into the 800 pressure zone and these two PRVs will supply the remainder of the Cooper Mountain area.
2.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and seismically resilient facilities.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design and installation of two pressure‐reducing valves (PRVs) to bring ASR water from 800 pressure zone down to the 550 pressure zone (2015‐16 project) and from 550 to 385 pressure zone (2019‐20 project).
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 TBD TBD Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No material impact.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 235,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 224,613 ‐ 459,613 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 36
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Farmington Road Pressure Sustaining Valve (PSV) for ASR Recharge
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Reliability
Prevents clogging of ASR wells, which can be caused by turbidity in injection water.
2.
Cost Effectiveness
Assists in maximizing the use of ASR operations during peak demands at a lower unit cost than other District water sources.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design and installation of new pressure sustaining valve in a vault located on Farmington Road. This PSV will ensure a higher proportion of JWC water will be routed to Grabhorn ASR and Miller Hill Road ASR. JWC water is preferred over Portland water for ASR injection due to a lower potential of turbidity in the water source.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 TBD TBD Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
PSV installation anticipated to reduce future maintenance costs and risk of downtime of ASR operations.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 37
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
385 Pressure Zone Pressure Relief Valve for ASR Recharge
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Provides fire flow and consistent pressure to the southern portion of the 385 pressure zone during ASR recharge operations.
2.
Cost Effectiveness
Assists in maximizing the use of ASR operations during peak demands at a lower unit cost than other District water sources.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design and installation of new pressure reducing valve in a vault located on 209th Avenue near Farmington Road. This PRV will supply consistent pressure and flow to the south end of the 385 pressure zone when the 30" transmission line in 209th is used to deliver high‐pressure JWC water to the base of Cooper Mountain for ASR injection
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 TBD TBD Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No material impact.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 38
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
St. Vincent Meter Vault
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Aging Infrastructure
Improves the metering facility to current operational standards.
2.
Reliability
Supports water system reliability for this critical hospital facility.
3.
Safety / Security
Provides upgraded metering facility in a vault that improves safety for workers and better access for entry.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Install a new meter vault for a meter to replace the existing 10' x 6' meter housed in a below‐grade vault. Existing vault also houses a reduced pressure principle backflow device. TVWD will coordinate with St. Vincent Hospital to replace the backflow device. Project includes design for installation of new meter vault, new pad (above‐grade) for St. Vincent backflow device installation, piping revisions to allow both 820 and 575 pressure zone connections to supply the new meter, demolition of the existing vault, and restoration of the site.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 TBD TBD Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
This project will result in easier and safer access to the meter vault resulting in net lower operating costs.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ ‐ 286,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 286,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 39
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Distribution Water Quality Sample Stations
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Customers Served
Provides greater operational information within the District to be able to maintain a high level of service for the customers.
2.
Water Quality
Enhances ability to monitor water quality within the District and comply with existing and potentially new regulatory requirements.
3.
Safety / Security
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Installation of additional water quality sampling stations. Ten additional sample stations per year for the next four years are planned with $5,000 per sample station adjusted for inflation.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Pipeline 11‐30‐01‐8504 C10230 Bill Richmond District Staff
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No material impact anticipated. Water quality monitoring will be performed by existing staff.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 50,000 52,000 54,080 56,243 ‐ ‐ 212,323 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 40
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Washington County Supply Line Emergency Pump Station Trailer Storage Facility
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Project Criticality
Weather‐proof storage is required to keep the trailer‐mounted pumps in good condition.
2.
Customers Served
Trailer‐mounted pumps provide emergency supply to multiple water providers.
3.
Safety / Security
Building will keep the trailers secure.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning, design, permitting, and construction of a new building to store the two emergency pump station trailer‐mounted pumps. The pumps will provide emergency water during outages to the District's Metzger service area, and the City of Tualatin.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Facilities 11‐30‐01‐8501 TBD Pete Boone Outside Contract
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% Yes 50%
This will result in increased operational costs, but the occurrence of its use will be extremely infrequent. Operating costs will be shared with City of Tualatin.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 150,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 150,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 41
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Radio Equipment Building & Generator Replacement
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of a key District communications facility that has reached the end of its useful life.
2.
Project Criticality
Upgrades equipment and provides a facility designed to current seismic standards.
3.
Safety / Security
Building will keep the radio equipment secure.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement recommend by the District's 2013 Wireless Master Plan. The current radio building does not meet conform to proper site standards for modern communications systems and seismic strength. Project includes installation of a 8' x 12' prefab building, a new standby generator, site preparation, and permits.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
Facilities 11‐30‐01‐8501 TBD Neil Kennedy District Staff
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes No No 0% No 0%
No material impact. This radio facility is already part of the routine maintenance performed by the District's Building & Grounds crew.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 42
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection)
FIELD OPERATIONS ‐ FLEET 2015‐17 REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE GL 11‐40‐01‐8831
Fleet Replacement ‐ Dept./Division OPS ‐ B&G
ITEM Landscape Maintenance flatbed truck
QTY
15‐16 Portion
16‐17 Portion
Total 2015‐2017 Field Operations Fleet Schedule Adopted
$ 908,750
$ 581,700
$ 327,050
REPLACEMENT UNIT
TOTAL AMT
EST. MONTH NEEDED
EST. YEAR NEEDED
1
1 ton flatbed with hoist. Replaces Unit 24
$ 45,350
7
2016
$ 226,600
7
2016
OPS ‐ C&M
dump truck 10‐12 yd.
1
Replaces Unit 42 ($50K allowed for CNG option)
OPS ‐ C&M
Hoe mounted hydraulic breaker
1
Replaces Unit 109
$ 23,000
7
2016
OPS ‐ C&M
2 axle HD equipment trailer
1
Replaces 222
$ 32,100
7
2016
OPS ‐ C&M
Excavator, 18 ton class
1
Replaces Unit 150
$ 131,800
12
2015
CSS ‐ FCS
compact pickup
6
Replaces Unit 2
$ 27,300
1
2016
CSS ‐ FCS
compact pickup
1
Replaces Unit 3
$ 27,300
1
2016
CSS ‐ FCS
compact pickup
1
Replaces Unit 11
$ 27,300
1
2016
CSS ‐ FCS/Meter Reading
Special Service Vehicles
6
Replaces Units 30,31,32,36,37,170,171,172
$ 246,000
7
2015
Eng. ‐ Eng.
compact pickup
1
Replaces Unit 6
$ 27,300
1
2016
Eng. ‐ Eng.
compact pickup
1
Replaces Unit 10
$ 28,700
1
2016
Eng. WQ/Backflow
compact pickup
1
Replaces Unit 12
$ 28,700
1
2016
Eng. ‐ Eng.
minivan
1
Replaces Unit 148
$ 37,300
10
2015
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 43
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Service Installations ‐ Field Operations
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Growth/Future Demands
Serves new customers as they are added to the District's service area, and replacement of aging meters and services as needed to provide reliable service.
2.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable water service to customers
3.
Customers Served
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This category of work involves the various ongoing installation and replacement of service installations and large meters by District crews in support of new development and customer base growth, and to replace aging infrastructure on an as needed basis. The service and large meter installation work is completed by TVWD Field Operations. Costs for new service installations are paid by separate development fees.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES
Meters & Services 11‐40‐42‐8470 Various Field Operations District Staff
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
No Yes No 0% No 0%
Meter and service maintenance is an ongoing and routine District activity. Meters and services for new customers are recovered through separate fees.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
975,000 1,225,000 1,278,100 1,299,300 1,382,393 1,437,689 1,495,196 1,555,004 8,447,682 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 44
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Meters Installations ‐ Field Customer Service
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Growth/Future Demands
Serves new customers as they are added to the District's service area, and replacement of aging meters and services as needed to provide reliable service.
2.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable water service to customers
3.
Customers Served
Enhances safety by improving level of service for customers and providing safe, reliable drinking water.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION This category of work involves the various ongoing installation and replacement primarily residential meters and services by District crews in support of new development and customer base growth, and to replace aging infrastructure on an as needed basis. The meter installation work is completed by TVWD Field Customer Service. Costs for new meters installations are paid by separate development fees.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES
Meters & Services 11‐20‐22‐8470 Various Field Customer Service District Staff
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes Yes No 0% No 0%
Meter and service maintenance is an ongoing and routine District activity. Meters and services for new customers are recovered through separate fees.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
172,000 215,700 214,420 242,237 251,926 262,003 272,483 283,383 1,526,452 ‐
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 45
Tualatin Valley Water District Adopted Capital Improvement Plan 2015‐17 (Six‐Year Projection) PROJECT TITLE:
Automated Meter Reading Program (AMR)
KEY DRIVERS FOR CIP PROJECT 1.
Aging Infrastructure
Replacement of aging infrastructure to provide new resilient appurtenances capable of providing long‐term, reliable service.
2.
Reliability
Improvements required to maintain reliable and resilient facilities.
3.
Cost Effectiveness
Provides new AMR meters to improve cost‐effectiveness of long term operations to the District's customers.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION The District is in the sixth year of a planned 25‐year program to implement Automated Meter Reading (AMR). All District meters will be retrofitted with AMR capabilities for remote capture of meter reading data. This will result in increased operational efficiencies by consolidating meter reading routes, reducing fleet and labor costs on a per‐read basis, and mitigating worker hazards and the frequency of repetitive injuries. Of the 58,600 meters in service about 15,000 have been replaced to date. The District anticipates installing 2,000‐2,500 AMR devices annually.
PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: General Ledger Account: Project Number: Project Manager: Work Performed By:
FUNDING SOURCES
Meters & Services 11‐20‐22‐8470 Various Field Customer Service District Staff
Water Rates: Service Fees: SDCs: Percent Eligible ‐ SDCs: Partner Cost Share : Partner Cost Percentage:
FUTURE OPERATING COST IMPACT
Yes Yes No 0% No 0%
This will result in decreased labor costs over time. Each AMR battery will need to be replaced about every twelve years. The District will budget for these replacements in the future as needed.
BUDGET INFORMATION & PROJECTED COSTS FY 13‐15 Budget
FY 13‐15 Projected
FY 15‐16 Budget
FY 16‐17 Budget
FY 17‐18 Projected
FY 18‐19 Projected
FY 19‐20 Projected
FY 20‐21 Projected
Six‐ Year Total
Future Years
975,000 855,000 380,000 416,000 432,640 449,946 467,943 486,661 2,633,190 8,500,000
CIP 2015‐17 Adopted
17 ‐ 46
