Canadian Forage and Grassland Association

Canadian Forage and Grassland Association Annual Report 2013 A strong national voice representing all sectors of the forage and grassland industry can...
Author: Gavin Garrett
2 downloads 3 Views 2MB Size
Canadian Forage and Grassland Association Annual Report 2013 A strong national voice representing all sectors of the forage and grassland industry can play a very important role in helping to keep the industry strong while at the same time realizing the huge potential it holds

1 CFGA Annual Report 2013

Acronyms Used in this Report AAFC ACCCRC ADOPT AFCC AIF BCFC BCRC CAAP CCA CFGA CFIA CQPF CRAAQ DAAF DFC EGS FBC GHG MAFRI MFGA MHHC NCC NH NSAC OFC OMAFRA PEIDA SAGES SFC UQAT USDA-ARS WNAC

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre Agriculture Demonstration of Practices and Technologies Atlantic Field Crop Committee Atlantic Innovation Fund British Columbia Forage Council Beef Cattle Research Council Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program Canadian Cattlemen’s Association The Canadian Forage and Grassland Association / Association Canadienne pour les Plantes Fourragères Canadian Food Inspection Agency Le Conseil Québécois des Plantes Fourragères Le Centre de référence en agriculture et agroalimentaire du Québec Department of Agriculture, Aquaculture and Fisheries (NB) Dairy Farmers of Canada Environmental Goods and Services Farm Business Communications Greenhouse gas Manitoba Agriculture Food and Rural Initiatives Manitoba Forage and Grassland Association Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation Nature Conservancy of Canada New Holland Nova Scotia Agricultural College Ontario Forage Council Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Prince Edward Island Department of Agriculture Sustainable Agriculture Environmental Systems Saskatchewan Forage Council Université du Québec en Abitibi- Témiscamingue United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service West Nova Agro Commodities Ltd.

2 CFGA Annual Report 2013

Table of Contents 1. Mission ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4  2. CFGA Priorities ......................................................................................................................................................... 4  3. Committees ................................................................................................................................................................ 4  3.1 Producers and Users Committee .......................................................................................................................... 4  3.2 Forage Export and Domestic Market Development Committee ........................................................................... 5  3.3 Research and Extension Committee .................................................................................................................... 5  3.4 Finance and Funding Committee ......................................................................................................................... 6  3.5 Communication and Promotion ........................................................................................................................... 6  3.6. CFGA and the Environment Committee............................................................................................................. 7  4. Board of Directors (2013) .......................................................................................................................................... 7  5. Executive (2013)........................................................................................................................................................ 7  6. Staff (2013) ................................................................................................................................................................ 7  7. Membership and Supporting Organizations .............................................................................................................. 8  8. Member Organization and Committee Reports ......................................................................................................... 8  8.1 Nova Scotia Forage and Agricultural Biomass Crop Report ............................................................................... 8  8.2 Le Conseil Québécois des Plantes Fourragères (Québec Forage Council) .......................................................... 9  8.3 Ontario Forage Council ....................................................................................................................................... 9  8.4 Manitoba Forage and Grassland Association .................................................................................................... 10  8.5 British Columbia Forage Council ...................................................................................................................... 12  8.6 Saskatchewan Forage Council and Saskatchewan Forage Industry Network .................................................... 13  8.7 Atlantic Canada ................................................................................................................................................. 14  9. Committee Reports .................................................................................................................................................. 16  9.1 CFGA/ACPF Producers & Users Committee .................................................................................................... 16  9.2 CFGA/ACPF Forage Export and Domestic Market Development Committee ................................................. 17  9.3 CFGA and the Environment Committee............................................................................................................ 17  9.4 Research and Extension Committee .................................................................................................................. 19  9.5 Communication and Promotion ......................................................................................................................... 19  10. Other Reports......................................................................................................................................................... 20  10.1 CFGA Highlights 2013 .................................................................................................................................... 20  10.2 Minutes of CFGA Annual General Meeting - December 12, 2012 ................................................................. 21  10.3 Finance and Sponsorship ................................................................................................................................. 24 

3 CFGA Annual Report 2013

1. Mission The Canadian Forage and Grassland Association / Association Canadienne pour les Plantes Fourragères (CFGA) is a national, non-profit association supported by stakeholders in the forage and grassland industry. Our mission is to promote the growth of the forage and grassland sector by advocating a sustainable and environmentally friendly industry which includes research and development, market development and innovation thereby enhancing the industry’s ability to profitably produce and supply forage and grassland products that offer superior value to producers and consumers in Canada and internationally.

2. CFGA Priorities   

The CFGA will work cooperatively with affiliated partners in the forage and grassland industry to develop and promote forage research and market opportunities The CFGA will be the voice for all aspects (including research, production and environment) of the Canadian forage and grassland industry The CFGA will communicate forage and grassland issues and opportunities to Canadians

3. Committees All Committee membership lists reflect those who served in 2013. 3.1 Producers and Users Committee 3.1.1 Membership  Bill Letondre (Chair) – Beef and Forage Producer  Doug Wray (Chair of CFGA) – Alberta Forage & Industry Network  Kelly Williamson- Saskatchewan Forage Council  David Wiens – Dairy Farmers of Canada  David Fulton – Manitoba Forage Producers & Beef Producers  Garth Healey – B.C. Forage Producers  John Agnew – Quebec Forage Producers  Sam Luckhardt – Ontario Forage Council  Lyndon Mansell – Alberta Forage Industry Network  Trevor Forbes – Soil and Crop Improvement Association of Nova Scotia  Pat Rutledge – Canadian Cattlemen’s Association  Brian Greaves – Sheep Industry 3.1.2 Purpose The CFGA Producers & Users Committee will represent all producers and users of forage and grasslands including the following sectors:   

The major livestock sectors such as beef, dairy, equine, sheep and bison Grassland/rangeland management and conservation Wetland and wildlife conservation

3.1.3 Mandate  Consider issues and provide direction regarding domestic forage and grassland production and use (including, but not limited to, grazing, hay, silage, annuals and forage seed)  Ensure that needs and issues within this sector of the forage and grassland industry are identified, vetted and addressed  Provide input and recommendations to the CFGA Research and Extension Committee  Bring forward recommendations to the Board of Directors

4 CFGA Annual Report 2013

3.2 Forage Export and Domestic Market Development Committee 3.2.1 Membership  Marc Lavoie (Chair) – Enterprises Macay, AB  Russ Mellow – Wilbur Ellis Company  Darren Chapman – Chapman Farms, MB  Germain LeFebvre – Quebec Forage Council, Quebec  Ray Robertson – Ontario Forage Council, ON  Alexandre Beaulieu – Haybec, Quebec  Phil & Landon Friesen – Southman Alfalfa, MB  Chris Kletke – Kletke Farms, MB  Ed Shaw – IQ Forage, AB  Greg Sommerfeld – Elcan Forage, AB  Peter Ball – Green Prairie International, AB  Mike Faulkner – Rockwood, ON  Mike Henry – Jan-Star Farms, Tara, ON  Jake Heppner – Altona, MB  Garry Johnson – Owen Sound, ON  Andre Larocque – Glen Robertson, ON  Harold McCutcheon – Thorndale, ON  Don Rowntree – Georgetown, ON  Barrie Sigurdsson – Gimli, MB  Nick/Gale Teleglow – Ste. Anne, MB  Youming Zhao – Hamilton, ON  Garth Healey – Abbottsford, BC 3.2.2 Purpose The CFGA Forage Export and Domestic Market Development Committee will represent the market access interests of the three sectors including domestic sales, US exports and Overseas Exports. 3.2.3 Mandate  Play a leadership role in addressing issues and opportunities of common interest to the overall forage export and domestic sector including market access issues such as transportation, market protocols and new market development  To ensure that needs and issues within this sector of the forage industry are identified, vetted and addressed  Provide input into the CFGA development of initiatives/proposals supporting market access development for forage exports and domestic markets  To enhance opportunities for new product development to all members by functioning as a conduit in providing information and in accessing national programs  Utilize activities such as fact finding missions, trade shows, trade missions and the hosting of trade missions to enhance market access for Canadian forage products  Serve as primary contact and source of information for companies/countries wishing to access Canadian forage products 3.3 Research and Extension Committee 3.3.1 Membership  Jack Kyle – Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) (Chair)  Bill Thomas – Agrapoint  Kerry LaForge – Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)  Mike Schellenberg – AAFC  Glenn Friesen – Manitoba Agriculture Food & Rural Initiatives (MAFRI)  Joel Bagg – Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs  Gilles Belanger – AAFC – Quebec  Paul Jefferson – Western Beef Development Centre  Reynold Bergen – Canadian Cattlemen’s Association  Grant Lastikwa – Alberta Agriculture & Rural Development 5 CFGA Annual Report 2013

3.3.2 Purpose This Committee is a standing committee of the CFGA. The CFGA Research and Extension Committee will provide leadership, direction and coordination in forage and grassland related research and extension including information and analysis, development of research and extension priorities and development of recommendations and implementation planning. 3.3.3 Mandate  Provide a forum for discussion of forage and rangeland/grassland research and extension activities and needs  Take input from the producer and user committee, industry and other stakeholders to determine priorities in research and extension programs  Provide analysis to the CFGA Board of Directors in regards to Research and Extension issues submitted to the CFGA for consideration  Facilitate a highly effective dissemination of research and extension products through the CFGA and its member organizations. 3.3.4 Committee Structure  Committee membership will include 12 members  The committee will have a Chair, Vice Chair and a Secretary  Vice Chair will serve a single term before completing a term as chair Research and Extension Committee representation will include a member from each of the following organizations:    

AAFC – Research Branch AAFC – Agriculture Environmental Services Branch Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC) Canadian Cattlemen’s Association (CCA)

Provincial government forage specialists and university researchers also will have positions on the committee, based on committee consensus, and approval by the CFGA Board of Directors.  3.4 Finance and Funding Committee 3.4.1 Membership  Doug Wray (Chair)  Ron Pidskalny The Committee is actively seeking a third member with a capacity for strategic thought as well as a good understanding of business dynamics and finances. 3.4.2 Purpose The purpose of this Committee is to focus on the financial position of CFGA and to monitor spending. 3.4.3 Mandate  Consider issues and provide direction regarding the financial operation of the CFGA  Bring forward recommendations to the Board of Directors  Provide direction to CFGA staff  Report to the CFGA Board of Directors and Members 3.5 Communication and Promotion 3.5.1 Membership  Ray Robertson (Chair)  Corie Arbuckle

6 CFGA Annual Report 2013

3.5.2 Purpose The purpose of this Committee is to provide direction for CFGA’s communication and promotional efforts. 3.5.3 Mandate  Consider issues and provide direction regarding communications and promotions of CFGA  Provide input on communication activities of CFGA such as the Website, the electronic newsletter and Press Releases  Bring forward recommendations to the Board of Directors  Provide direction to CFGA staff  Report to the CFGA Board of Directors and Members 3.6. CFGA and the Environment Committee 3.6.1 Membership  Henry Nelson (Co-chair) – Manitoba Forage & Grassland Association Chad Anderson (Co-chair) – Ontario Soil & Crop Improvement Association  Bill Letondre – Pickseed Canada Inc.  Fawn Jackson – Canadian Cattlemen’s Association  Glenn Friesen – Manitoba Agriculture Food and Rural Initiatives  Guy Seguin – Dairy Farmers of Canada  Joan McKinley – Ontario Forage Council  Karen Clark – Dairy Famers of Canada  Kerry LaForge – Agri-Environment Services Branch  Peg Strankman – Barbwire Consulting.

4. Board of Directors (2013) Germain Lefebrve Ray Robertson Henry Nelson Leanne Thompson Doug Wray Marc Lavoie Darren Chapman Pat Rutledge David Wiens Garth Healey Bill Letondre Trevor Forbes Jack Kyle

Quebec Forage Council (representing Eastern Canada) Ontario Forage Council Manitoba Forage Council Saskatchewan Forage Council Alberta Forage Industry Network Macay Enterprises Ltd. (representing the Overseas Exporters) Chapman Farms (representing the U.S. Exporters) (representing the Canadian Cattlemen’s Association) Dairy Farmers of Canada BC Forage Council Pickseed (representing Producer & Users Committee) Soil & Crop Improvement Association of Nova Scotia Ontario Ministry of Agriculture & Food (representing Research & Technology Transfer)

5. Executive (2013) Doug Wray Ray Robertson Marc Lavoie Jack Kyle Bill Letondre

Chair Vice-Chair (Executive) (Executive) (Executive)

6. Staff (2013) Wayne Digby Ron Pidskalny Corie Arbuckle Chris Yuzdepski Peggy Strankman

Executive Director Executive Director (incoming) Communication Specialist Financial Officer Manager Partner Programs

7 CFGA Annual Report 2013

7. Membership and Supporting Organizations              

Soil and Crop Improvement Association of Nova Scotia Quebec Forage Council Ontario Forage Council Manitoba Forage Council Saskatchewan Forage Council Alberta Forage Industry Network BC Forage Council Canadian Cattlemen’s Association Dairy Farmers of Canada Overseas Exporters US Exporters Patron Memberships Discussions on-going with Canadian Sheep Federation, Equine Canada and Canadian Bison Association Industry Sponsors

8. Member Organization and Committee Reports 8.1 Nova Scotia Forage and Agricultural Biomass Crop Report Submitted by Bill Thomas, Director of Extension, Field Crop Specialist, Perennia 8.1.1 Highlights  Good seasonal distribution of rainfall resulted in good pasture growth and three to four good cuts of forage  Poor weather during early to mid-June resulted in poorer than average forage quality on many farms  A decline in forage acres as cattle number decline and more land is planted to corn and soybeans  High availability of land provides opportunity to develop biomass energy industry The majority of cropland in Nova Scotia is in forage production. However, the proportion of cropland in forage production has decreased in recent years to around 60 percent, down from 65 percent in 2006. Declining beef cattle numbers and more profitable cash crops have led to the decline in the number of forage acres and an increase in the number of acres growing corn and soybeans. Over 90 percent of the forage produced in the province is fed on-farm. The farm gate price for conserved forage being fed to cattle ranges from $100.00 to $150.00 per dry matter tonne. Fair weather in late May allowed those farms that started harvesting their first cut early, to put up good quality forage. Wet weather in early to mid-June meant many farms were not able to harvest their first cut in a timely manner, resulting in poorer than normal first cut forage on these farms. Regular rainfall throughout the growing season resulted in good pasture growth and three to four good cuts of forage. 8.1.2 Major Initiatives in the Forage and Agricultural Biomass Sector The key to grass-fed beef is high quality forage; both pasture and conserved feed. Only top quality forage will enable cattle to finish on grass. A major provincial government initiative currently under way is the demonstration of the critical elements and principles of intensive rotational grazing for the production of high quality pasture and improved animal performance at Cape John Community Pasture. The Cape John Pasture Project entered its third year with continued producer interest. The productivity of the pasture has increased significantly with the implementation of a controlled grazing system. It is hoped that this project can be continued to further demonstrate the opportunities of management intensive grazing. The Cape John Pasture Project is a collaborative effort involving the Nova Scotia Government, Perennia, Dalhousie University, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and Cape John Community Pasture. In 2012, West Nova Agro Commodities Ltd. (WNAC) in Annapolis County received federal-provincial AgriFlexibility funding for a Grass Pellet Value Chain Project. One of the objectives of this two-year project is to develop and deliver an extension program focused on stimulating grass fuel pellet production in the western region of the province. Demonstration trials for miscanthus, switchgrass, reed canarygrass and timothy were established on several farms to investigate which grass species are going to be the most productive, profitable and suitable for producing briquettes. The WNAC target is to start commercial “pelleting” of briquettes in January 2014. 8 CFGA Annual Report 2013

A forage cultivar evaluation project funded under the Canada/Nova Scotia Innovation Fund will provide Nova Scotia producers with reliable, independent, third party evaluation of red clover, alfalfa, white clover, trefoil, timothy, bromegrass and perennial ryegrass cultivars for the production of livestock feed and reed canarygrass, timothy, switchgrass, big bluestem and Indiangrass cultivars for the production of biofuel. A survey to determine the level of mycotoxins in both corn silage and high moisture corn is being conducted through the analysis of samples collected from dairy farms across the province. The Agricultural Biomass Sustainable Practices Working Group, comprised of representatives from the Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture, Dalhousie Faculty of Agriculture, Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture, Perennia and the Environmental Farm Plan program, was formed to identify and guide the development of best management practices related to the sustainable production of agricultural biomass. A document providing direction concerning production practices that support environmentally sustainable agricultural biomass production was compiled under the direction of the working group. 8.2 Le Conseil Québécois des Plantes Fourragères (Québec Forage Council) The mission of Le Conseil Québécois des Plantes Fourragères (CQPF) is to represent and promote the forage crop sector (industry). The CQPF operates a web site at www.cqpf.ca. The organization publishes the Echo-Fourrager newsletter regularly, with weekly articles distributed through La Terre de Chez Nous. CQPF coordinates a financial management of the forage crop testing network, organizes the Commercial Hay Day Conference (December 4, 2013) and an annual forage field day (September 20, 2013). A two-day forage tour in the Bas St-Laurent region, east of Quebec City, in June 2013 had about 15 participants. The CQPF annual meeting was held in November 2013 and a provincial symposium was held November 27, 2013 Comité Plantes fourragères du CRAAQ (Le Centre de référence en agriculture et agroalimentaire du Québec) (Forage Crop Committee) has an annual half-day meeting that includes eight scientific presentations, will be held on February 14, 2014 and will have over 75 participants. The sub-committee on variety testing and recommendations met in January and circulated a list of recommended cultivars for 2013-14, which is available at http://www.agrireseau.qc.ca/Plantes-Fourrageres/documents/culture_recomm_fourrages_PLF2013.pdf. Strategic plans for the Quebec forage sector (2012-2017) include two projects:  

A strategic study on forage product development for domestic and export markets (June 14, 2013) Forage identification guide and animated videos about forages

CQPF will be hiring an executive director, and has already posted an advertisement for the position. The structure of the CQFC board of directors will include nine members. Membership is offered in four categories:    

Grand partner ($2,500 annually) – four current members Platinum partner ($1000) – nine members Associated members ($350) – 13 members Individual members ($25) – 400 members

8.3 Ontario Forage Council The Ontario Forage Council’s (OFC) mission is to support and strengthen the province’s forage industry and build a strong voice to promote the importance of forage by:   

Projecting a unified voice Raising the profile on forages Supplying a valuable province-wide industry network

Our network consists of producers, input suppliers, government, researchers, forage processors and end users. OFC has three levels of membership: gold, corporate and individual members. Gold members include Dairy Farmers of Ontario, Ontario Cattlemen’s Association, Ontario Sheep Marketing Agency, Pioneer Hi-Bred Ltd., A&L Canada Laboratories, Bruce Agra Dehy and Activation Laboratories. Corporate members include Can grow Crop Solutions Inc., Growmark, Great Lakes Agra Corporation, International Stock Food, Mapleseed, Nutritional Feed Additives 9 CFGA Annual Report 2013

Inc., Ontario Soil & Crop Improvement Association, Pickseed Canada Inc., ProRich Seeds, Quality Seeds Ltd., Speare Seeds, University of Guelph, SGS Agrifood Laboratories and Nuhn Forage Inc. The goal of OFC’s Hay Marketing Forum is to allow reputable members to strive to produce quality hay for domestic and international markets such as the United States, the Middle East and China. We are raising our profile by promoting forages through a variety of sources such as public and producer conferences (Forage Focus, Profitable Pastures), annual forage events (Ontario Forage Expo) our web site and newsletters. The web site includes Ontario Hay Listings. Newsletters are produced in the fall and spring. The new “Milk Maker” Forage Competition, a feature of the Canadian Dairy XPO will be held February 5-6, 2014 at the Stratford Rotary Complex in Stratford, ON. This event presents an excellent way to market excess forage and includes cash prizes! There are six forage classes: Hay, haylage (2 classes), baleage, and corn silage (two classes). Winning entries will be displayed for all to admire. OFC also provides direction for forage research in Ontario and extends its reach to the national and international levels through the CFGA. 8.4 Manitoba Forage and Grassland Association In 2013, the Manitoba Forage and Grassland Association (MFGA), formerly The Manitoba Forage Council, adopted a name change to more accurately reflect the scope of the work of the organization. The Board felt that “Grasslands” would resonate with a broader cross section of the public and ultimately assist with outreach activities – and MFGA affirmed this belief when a conservation group interested in preserving grasslands contacted the Executive Director. The organization indicated it wanted to meet with MFGA when it saw the word grasslands included in the name of the organization. The Board also felt the name was in keeping with the Canadian Forage and Grassland Association. Along with the name change the Board developed Vision and Mission statements to accurately describe why MFGA exists and what it does. Its Vision is, “Vibrant, sustainable grasslands and forage crops that contribute positively to healthy, diverse, sustainable communities of plants, animals and humans living together in harmony on the various landscapes.” Its Mission is, “To promote the advantages of forages and grasslands and their good management for the benefit of farmers, the environment and society.” The Vision, like the new name, recognizes the contributions forages and grasslands can and do make to sustainability. The Mission follows the Vision describing where MFGA focuses its efforts in order to realize its vision. Once the Vision and Mission were established the Board embarked on the development of a business plan. This plan is currently being developed and the following is a brief outline of the approach and progress to date. The first step was to identify these four lines of business. 1. 2. 3. 4.

Governance and Policy Research, Environment and Information Management Member Services Financial Management and Fundraising

Each of the four focus areas will establish goal(s), and outline activities, performance measures, target dates, budgets and responsibilities. The Governance and Policy committee have completed a first draft of their plan with the exception of the budget, which will be completed once all four lines of business have a first draft and priorities are established. The second line of business, Research, Environment and Information Management is just starting to organize. Member Services, historically a major focus for the organization, includes MFGA’s Communications and Extension activities to farmer members, which include the web site, newsletters, grazing clubs, the Green Gold Program, hay market support, tours and conferences. Part time staff are involved in each of these areas. The business plan will facilitate goal-setting, activity planning and budgeting in relation to all other lines of business. Hay marketing and livestock feed will continue to be the focus of Member Services.

10 CFGA Annual Report 2013

Financial Management and Fundraising has three focus areas: 1. 2. 3.

Budget preparation and management Partnering Outreach

Budget Preparation and Management, while self-explanatory, will change somewhat from the past, as there will be more opportunity to prioritize in relation to all the organizations goals. Partnerships relates to organizations MFGA already works with, such as the CFGA, provincial associations, Manitoba Beef Producers, Dairy Farmers of Manitoba, Manitoba Sheep Association, Forage Seed Association, the Association of Manitoba Municipalities, hay marketers, Keystone Agricultural Producers and Ducks Unlimited. The business plan should however encourage more goal setting and focus on specific projects. Outreach is a newer area for MFGA and one it hopes to develop in the future. MFGA recently engaged the services of a part-time Outreach Coordinator to assist in partnership development in five areas:     

Agricultural companies – machinery, feed, seed and fertilizer companies. The conservation sector – conservation districts, Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC), Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation (MHHC) and the Lake Winnipeg Foundation Government departments – Conservation, Energy, Healthy Living and Tourism Petroleum companies Philanthropic options

MFGA has identified a goal and some potential partners. The goal is to explore, align and develop formal arrangements, coalitions or agreements with like-minded conservation groups operating in Manitoba to promote the environmental benefits of forages and grasslands. Potential partners include Conservation Districts, NCC, MHHC, Ducks Unlimited and the Lake Winnipeg Foundation. Activities will vary, depending on the organization and the joint objectives identified. MFGA is planning for projects that involve several organizations – after all, everyone is interested in clean air and water. Activities could include educational communications, research, demonstrations and fund raising, among other initiatives as deemed appropriate by the organizations. A key objective will be to identify areas of common interest between organizations for potential co-operative projects with multiple players. In terms of outreach with the conservation sector, MFGA will identify and undertake projects with specific organizations. Performance measures will include the establishment of letters of agreement or other formal conformation of agreement in areas of common interest. MFGA will establish target goals with each of the organizations contacted. Activities will be reported to the Board, and will be reviewed and evaluated one year following the implementation of the business plan. The intent is to enter into formal arrangements with organizations with common goals. Once agreements are in place, there will be regular reporting to the Board. Budget development is pending. Responsibility will reside with the Executive Director, Outreach Coordinator and Board Committee Chair. MFGA will need to fill this position. Current human resources at MFGA include:      

Jim Lintott, who raises forages and beef cattle on the northeast side of Winnipeg, is a founding member of the MFGA and ardent supporter of the CFGA Wanda McFadyen, the recently appointed Executive Director, who brings a wealth of agricultural experience in beef, farm stewardship, animal care and farm policy Duncan Morrison, who, having completed a consulting assignment for MFGA has extensive experience with conservation groups, and as such, is well positioned to coordinate outreach activities Denice Girdner, who has been assisting Corie Arbuckle with MFGA communications, and will take over the communications portfolio John McGregor, a retired Extension Specialist with Manitoba Agriculture Food and Rural Development (MAFRD), who will continue to coordinate extension activities for MFGA Chris Yuzdepski, who will continue to manage MFGA financials

MFGA retains all staff on a part time basis. For a complete listing of the Board of Directors please see the MFGA web site at http://mfga.net/about-us/board-of-directors/

11 CFGA Annual Report 2013

8.5 British Columbia Forage Council The British Columbia Forage Council (BCFC) continues to operate on a minimal budget based on project administration as the sole source of funding. Despite the lack of funding, interest in the Forage Council remains strong with 19 Board members including forage producers, beef producers, agri-business, University, federal and provincial government representatives. 8.5.1 Forage Export Project (2013) BCFC is close to releasing a report on the Central Interior Forage Industry. This report was initiated to address marketing issues related to a hay surplus created in the Central Interior by a decade long downturn in the beef industry, and to consider the potential development of a hay export industry. Two hay compression plants were constructed in the Vanderhoof area in 2012, and started operations in 2013 to process hay for export. The main objectives of the report were to:    

Identify production potential of the area Identify opportunities and challenges related to hay production for the domestic market and the export market Provide information to allow producers to make a decision to produce product for the export market To assess the potential impact of a Central Interior hay export industry on other agricultural sectors and regions

The report reviews regional resources for the area and raises a number of issues and constraints related to hay production for the export market. It provides information on current export markets, processing, transportation and marketing. 8.5.2 Cariboo-Chilcotin Forage Variety Trials (2009 – 2012) Cattle ranching is a $100 million industry in the Cariboo-Chilcotin area with over 20 percent of the province's cattle herd in the region. With such a large percentage of BC's total herd, it is sometimes difficult for ranchers to sustain an adequate amount of locally grown feed for their livestock. As net importers of forage, cattle ranchers in the CaribooChilcotin are interested in variety testing trials to provide knowledge on crops and varieties that will optimize feed capacity and increase profitability. This project, led by the BC Forage Council in partnership with Cariboo cattle producer groups and funding from the Investment Agriculture Foundation of BC and the Northern Development Initiative Trust (among others), was aimed at decreasing dependence on imported cattle feed from other regions. The four test sites were located in Williams Lake, Miocene, Soda Creek, and Redstone (Figures 1-4). Figures 1 and 2: Two of Four Test BC Forage Council / Cariboo Cattle Producer Group Test Sites

12 CFGA Annual Report 2013

Figures 3 and 4: Two of Four Test BC Forage Council / Cariboo Cattle Producer Group Test Sites

8.6 Saskatchewan Forage Council and Saskatchewan Forage Industry Network 8.6.1 Saskatchewan Forage Council  Strength in partnerships within the province, western Canada and across Canada  Focus on representing and working for the benefit of ALL facets of the ‘forage’ industry  Links to the livestock sector (SK Beef Industry Development Fund support)  Working towards increased visibility for the province’s forage industry 8.6.2 Current Projects  Development of Forage Network – pulling together stakeholders to identify common problems and work towards solutions  Agriculture Demonstration of Practices and Technologies (ADOPT) Projects - practical focus, on-farm applications for current forage issues  Trace Mineral Project – extensive research project looking at trace mineral status of pasture forages across SK  Forage Market Reporting – two reports per year to provide the most detailed summary of forage prices in the province  Also assist in planning and organization of forage related workshops and activities including SK Pasture School and various regional workshops 8.6.3 Recent Successes  Forage Network Project – pulled together industry stakeholders to combine funds of $43,000 annually towards graduate student work  RR Alfalfa Report – collaborated with CFGA to look at potential impact on forage industry. The final report is now available.  “Saskatchewan’s Forage Industry: A Multi-Level Analysis.” Final report published in 2010 8.6.4 Communications/Extension  www.saskforage.ca  Forage and Livestock eNews  Saskatchewan Hay and Pasture Report  Saskatchewan Livestock & Forage Gazette  Annual Saskatchewan Pasture School  Winter Regional Meetings  Annual SFC Tour and Meeting 8.6.5 Role of the SFC As a result of Saskatchewan Forage Council (SFC) activities:   

Better informed clients will aid in sustainability of forage and livestock industries More producers will be aware of the adaptation and diversification opportunities for forages Coordination of activities across forage industry will improve

13 CFGA Annual Report 2013

8.6.6 Contact Us  Website www.saskforage.ca  Leanne Thompson – Executive Director  Phone (306) 969-2666  Email [email protected] 8.7 Atlantic Canada 8.7.1 2013 Forage Crop Report Yousef Papadopoulos (NS, AAFC Research Scientist), Bill Thomas (NS, Perennia Manager of Extension and Field Crop Specialist), Jack VanRoestel (NS, Perennia Field Crop Specialist), Wayne Molloy (Newfoundland and Labrador, AAFC Research Technician) and Trevor Forbes (Soil and Crop Improvement Association of Nova Scotia, Director). In general, the 2013 cropping season in the Maritime region was characterized with good seasonal distribution of rainfall, which resulted in good pasture growth, and three to four good cuts of forage. The good rainfall and above average temperatures resulted excellent fall pasture conditions. Poor weather during early to mid-June resulted in poorer than average forage quality on many farms. In general, there is a decline in forage acres as cattle number decline and more land is planted to corn and soybeans. High availability of land in the Maritime region provides an opportunity to develop a biomass energy industry. The 2013 growing season in Newfoundland and Labrador across all regions was good; grass and/or legume first and second harvest yields and quality were good across the province. Most regions harvested a marginal third cut providing industry with a greater degree of forage self-sufficiency for the upcoming winter. Wet conditions in some areas of the province delayed the second cut and decreased quality. Weed pressure from curled dock and pigweed seem to be a “growing” concern in some regions with farmers suggesting limited control with normal herbicide management programs. Armyworm pressure was less than in the 2013 season. This may be attributed to AAFC and the province helping improve awareness and providing scouting management keeping everyone aware of armyworm pressure areas. Silage corn production under photodegradable plastic mulch and conventional reported another great growing season with DM’s over 30 % and strong yields. The dairy sector continues to clear land for self-sufficiency in forage production with this trend continuing into next year. Labour concerns are an escalating problem in eastern region of the province throughout the agriculture sector with more foreign workers providing a much-needed skill set. 8.7.2 2013 Research Update Research participants involved or associated in the projects listed below include – Yousef Papadopoulos, AAFC, Truro; John Duynisveld, AAFC, Nappan; Bill Thomas, Perennia, Truro; Jack VanRoestel, Perennia, Kentville; Peter Scott, New Brusnwick Department of Agriculture Aquaculture and Fisheries (NBDAAF), Fredricton; Wayne Molloy, AAFC, St. John's; Gilles Bélanger, AAFC, Québec; Gaëtan Tremblay, AAFC, Québec; Julie Lajeunesse, AAFC, Normandin; Alan Fredeen, Dalhousie faculty of Agricultural, Truro; Hushton Block, AAFC, Brandon , Carole Lafreniere, Université du Québec en Abitibi- Témiscamingue (UQAT), Rouyn-Noran; ; Ira Mandell, University of Guelph; Sherry Fillmore, AAFC, Kentville, Les Halliday, Prince Edward Island Department of Agriculture (PEIDA); Jack Kyle (OMAFRA, Lindsay); Kathleen Glover, Truro; Dave Barrett, Dalhousie faculty of Agricultural, Truro; Jonathon Wort, Perennia, Truro; Prithiviraj, Dalhousie faculty of Agricultural, Truro; P. Havard, Dalhousie faculty of Agricultural, Truro; M.O. Johnston, Dalhousie University, Halifax; A. Gunawardena, Dalhousie University, Halifax; S. Gaul, AAFC, Kentville; Amy Sangster, Perennia, Truro; Don Viands, Cornel University, Ithaca, N.Y; B. Coulman, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon; David Gehl, AAFC, Indian Head; Yves Castonguay, AAFC, Quebec; Annie Claessens, AAFC, Quebec; Annick Bertrand, AAFC, Quebec. In Newfoundland and Labrador AAFC’s forage research included evaluation of photo and bio-degradable plastic mulch for breakthrough and degradation with silage and sweet corn. AAFC grass/legume research continued with Dairy Farmers of Newfoundland and Labrador evaluating forage mixtures on newly cleared land looking at what mixtures will provide an improved yield, persistence and soil improvement, this project has four industry partners in four regions of the province. AAFC in NL has partnered in a study with several groups developing and optimizing ensiled fish from aquaculture waste for use as an agriculture fertilizer, Allan Kwabiah is the lead researcher on these projects. A Sustainable Agriculture Environmental Systems (SAGES) funded project, managed by Gary Bishop, is looking into longevity and movement of E. coli from liquid dairy manure on tile-drained soils, comparing surface banded and broadcast manure application, and he is also investigating the management of alfalfa/brome grass forage mixture with liquid dairy manure as the prime nutrient source. Researchers have also initiated a winter cereal research site at the ACCCRC with plans to expand this study. Provincial initiatives include forage land renovation 14 CFGA Annual Report 2013

demonstration, evaluation of plough-down crops in Labrador to improve soil organic matter, spring and winter cereal evaluation trials. In Prince Edward Island provincial initiatives, the Growing Forward program is currently funding two forage-related projects: 1) evaluating creeping red fescue as a seed crop; and 2) evaluation of blight-resistant corn. The key to grass-fed beef is high quality forage; both pasture and conserved feed. Only top quality forage will enable cattle to finish on grass. In Nova Scotia, a major provincial government initiative currently under way is the demonstration of the critical elements and principles of intensive rotational grazing for the production of high quality pasture and improved animal performance at Cape John Community Pasture. The Cape John Pasture Project entered its third year with continued producer interest. The productivity of the pasture has increased significantly with the implementation of a controlled grazing system. It is hoped that this project can be continued to further demonstrate the opportunities of management intensive grazing. The Cape John Pasture Project is a collaborative effort involving the Nova Scotia Government, Perennia, Dalhousie University, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and Cape John Community Pasture. In 2012, West Nova Agro Commodities Ltd. (WNAC) in Annapolis County of NS received federal-provincial AgriFlexibility funding for a Grass Pellet Value Chain Project. One of the objectives of this two-year project is to develop and deliver an extension program focused on stimulating grass fuel pellet production in the western region of the province. Demonstration trials for miscanthus, switchgrass, reed canarygrass and timothy were established on several farms to investigate which grass species are going to be the most productive, profitable and suitable for producing briquettes. The WNAC target is to start commercial “pelleting” of briquettes in January 2014. The major forage concerns in the Atlantic region are the high price of fuel and chemical fertilizers, the low number of young farmers entering farming and the labour shortage on farm. The high cost of energy is getting people interested in biomass for fuel. Test plots researching the yield potential of several C3 and C4 grasses are at several locations across the region are in their third production year. Performance testing includes the evaluation of new varieties of forage, mixtures and management for Bio-Fuel Production is continuing in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. These projects include: 1) assessment of Fertilizer Rate and Cutting Date on Grass Biofuel Yields, Chemical Composition and Heating Value (NS); and 2) forage species mixture (four grasses and three legumes) – evaluating biomass yield with three harvest dates (NB). In Nova Scotia, the Agricultural Biomass Sustainable Practices Working Group, comprised of representatives from the Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture, Dalhousie Faculty of Agriculture, Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture, Perennia and the Environmental Farm Plan program, was formed to identify and guide the development of best management practices related to the sustainable production of agricultural biomass. A document providing direction concerning production practices that support environmentally sustainable agricultural biomass production was compiled under the direction of the working group. Agronomists and animal scientists at AAFC, Dalhousie faculty of Agricultural (formerly Nova Scotia Agricultural College-NSAC), University of Guelph and UQAT, Rouyn-Noran are assembling the results from large number of research dairy, beef, sheep, and modelling projects: 1.

2.

3.

4. 5.

Performance of forage mixtures under a beef grazing management system in the Northern Latitudes. Funding for this project was provided by Beef Cluster (Beef Cluster 1 and Beef Cluster 2; AAFC and the Beef Cattle Research Council (BCRC) Beneficial Fatty Acids in Lamb – The Effects of Different Feeding Systems. Research and reporting was completed and funding for this project was provided by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through AgriFutures, Nova Scotia’s Canadian Agricultural Adaptation Program (CAAP) Council Nutritionally enhanced milk products for the Atlantic Canada dairy industry. Research and reporting was completed and funding for this project was provided by the Atlantic Innovation Fund (AIF), Industry Partners included DFNS & Acadia Seaplants Ltd Multiple breeding initiatives to overcome poor persistence of forage legume species (AAFC, Truro) The role of legume and grass species/cultivars in the improvement of nitrogen transfer efficiency in forage production (AAFC and Dalhousie Faculty of Agricultural, Truro).

Agronomists and Plant breeders in North America have been collaborating in the following forage breeding studies: 1.

Evaluation of new breeding lines of alfalfa for adaptation to acidic soil conditions (AAFC, Truro, NS; AAFC Lethbridge, AB; and Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

15 CFGA Annual Report 2013

2.

3. 4. 5.

Evaluation of bird’s-foot trefoil for vigor (AAFC, Truro, NS; United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Logan, Utah; Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; USDA/ARS Madison, Wisconsin; and University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN) Clonal line selection for improving forage yield of alfalfa (AAFC, Truro, NS; Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; AAFC Lethbridge, AB; AAFC Québec city, QC; and University of Minnesota, St. Paul MN) Red Clover Cold Tolerance Trial (AAFC Truro, NS; AAFC Québec City, QC; AAFC Normandin, QC; AAFC Saskatoon, SK; and AAFC Lethbridge, AB) Evaluating the theory of general adaptation in red clover (AAFC Truro, NS; Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; AAFC Québec City, QC; USDA/ARS Madison, Wisconsin; South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD; AAFC Saskatoon, SK; AAFC Lethbridge, AB; and AAFC Agassiz BC).

AAFC grass/legume research continued with Dairy Farmers of Newfoundland and Labrador evaluating forage mixtures on newly cleared land looking at what mixtures will provide an improved yield, persistence and soil improvement. This project has four industry partners in four regions of the province and this research will start a second phase for the 2014-15 growing season investigating forage mixtures for quality, persistence and regrowth for second and potential third cuts. AAFC collaboration with Dalhousie, provincial agriculture branch, Fisheries and Aquaculture, and industry continued in developing and optimizing ensiled fish from aquaculture waste for use as an agriculture fertilizer, with Allan Kwabiah the lead researcher on these projects. The winter cereal study with the province, Atlantic Cool Climate Crop Research Centre (ACCCRC) and industry had a successful year investigating winter cereal production for use as dry grain and high moisture using technology from Finland to inoculate and store grain using a modified Ag bagger, with the provincial Agri-Foods Branch leading this project. Provincial initiatives also include forage species evaluation and soil organic matter study on sandy soils in Labrador. 8.7.4 Atlantic Field Crop Committee Forage and Corn Cultivar Evaluation Task Group The Atlantic Field Crop Committee (AFCC) is responsible for production and cultivar registration recommendations for selected forage crops in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland. This committee accomplished its mandate in cooperation with Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Atlantic Food & Horticulture Research Centre, Kentville, NS; Agriculture & Agri-food Canada Research Farm, Nappan, Nova Scotia; Dalhousie faculty of Agricultural, Truro, Nova Scotia; P.E.I. Department of Agriculture and Forestry; Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Perennia, Extension services; and the New Brunswick Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture. Perennia staff, Truro, NS, coordinate the Atlantic Regional Forage Cultivar Evaluation Trials (five sites; four in Nova Scotia and one in New Brunswick). Bill Thomas is the coordinator responsible for this initiative. Perennia staff, Truro, NS, coordinate the Maritime Silage Corn Evaluation Trials (five Maritime sites with 36 hybrids tested). Jack VanRoestel is the coordinator responsible for this initiative. Site locations and agronomists managing these locations include: Aylesford, NS, Jack VanRoestel, Agri-Point International, Kentville; Kentville, NS, Yousef Papadopoulos, AAFC, Kentville; Truro, NS, Nancy Mclean, Dalhousie faculty of Agricultural, Truro; Woodstock, NB, Peter Scott, Department of Agriculture, Aquaculture and Fisheries (DAAF), Fredericton; Sherry Fillmore, AAFC, statistical analysis, Kentville, NS. Active regional trials established in 2011 include:- alfalfa, red clover, white clover, bird’s-foot trefoil, Timothy, bromegrass, reed canarygrass, tall fescue, perennial ryegrass, orchardgrass, meadow fescue, bluegrass and annual ryegrass.

9. Committee Reports 9.1 CFGA/ACPF Producers & Users Committee Priorities for this Committee fall into three categories:    

Forage variety testing Agronomic issues Industry competitiveness Sustainability

16 CFGA Annual Report 2013

9.1.1 Forage Variety Testing In light of proposed changes in the Seed Act by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), The Canadian Forage & Grassland Association (CFGA) is seeking input from forage and rangeland stakeholders on the value of forage variety testing. These proposed changes could bring significant change to the sector as the requirement for merit testing of forage species, which is part of the current registration process, is phased out in late 2013. 9.1.2 Priority Issues – Agronomic  Foxtail barley  The Committee would like to compile and distill information into a concise package in electronic format and upload it to the CFGA web site  There is a need for forage varieties that will grow in saline areas to compete with foxtail barley  Richardson Ground Squirrel and Northern Pocket Gopher  The Committee would like to develop a project and move towards implementing a strategy that includes a range of stakeholders  Other weed issues  White cockle and tall buttercup  Growing Forward 2 funds may be an option for addressing issues with invasive weed species  Pot holes and land drainage  The Committee would like to consider ways of discouraging land drainage.  This issue should be discussed with the CFGA and the Environment Committee 9.1.3 Industry Competitiveness  Government programs  Carbon offsets  Forages being converted to cash crops  Awareness of the value of the forage industry 9.1.4 Sustainability for CFGA  Capacity for GFGA to take on projects  Partnering with industry  Access to funding  Human resources 9.1.5 Research  Lack of research funding  Decreasing number of scientists working on forage research  Small market 9.2 CFGA/ACPF Forage Export and Domestic Market Development Committee The top three Committee priorities include:   

Developing a timothy protocol for the Chinese market that is acceptable to Canadian exporters Obtaining an adjustment for the China alfalfa protocol allowing acceptance of producer certification for local field inspection Developing a protocol for the export of mixed hay into the Middle East

In terms of exports to the US, markets continue to be strong for dairy (cows and goats) in the Midwest, as well as for beef and horses. Wheat straw sales have been stronger than in the past due to high volumes of unharvested US corn, and very little bailing of corn stover because of the early onset of winter. Members have also received inquiries on the pricing of beef hay for rail points in Winnipeg and Saskatoon. Hay is required to load intermodal containers for unloading in Kansas City, KS. Demand is due to early onset of a winter that has proven to be cold, with higher than average snowfall that resulted in early termination of pasture grazing and a lack of hay in the area. 9.3 CFGA and the Environment Committee The Committee, in establishing its purpose, recognizes that its key role is to bring information together in a form where CFGA can make a case to both agricultural and non-agricultural sectors that forages and grasslands are crucial to economic, environmental and social sustainability. The Committee’s stated purpose is, “To develop and/or 17 CFGA Annual Report 2013

compile as necessary information that demonstrates to farmers, industry, consumers and the general public how forages and grasslands contribute to economic, environmental and social sustainability locally and globally.” The Committee’s three areas of focus include: 1.

Food production, namely protein from:  Ruminants such as cattle, sheep and goats  Poultry

2.

Environmental Goods and Services (EGS)  Clean air and water  Healthy soils and improved water management and long term productivity gains  Biodiversity/wildlife habitat  Carbon sequestration

3.

Resource efficiency and reduced carbon footprint  Lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions  Lower fossil fuel (energy) requirements and improved energy balances (calories of fuel in vs calories of food produced)  Efficient land, water, mineral usage (less waste of limited resources)  Demonstrate the competitiveness of forages and grasslands in food production

Initial tasks for the Committee included creating an inventory of environmental research information on forages and grasslands. There is a wealth of information on a wide range of topics such as GHG, carbon sequestration, water management/filtration, soil improvement, biodiversity, energy savings, food safety and animal welfare. These resources are being made available to the public on the CFGA web site. A second task was to assess the information, define the message and decide how to package the material for different audiences such as farmers, conservation groups, agricultural industry, petroleum industry, urban audiences and schoolchildren. The Committee also needed to identify gaps where more research and or confirmation and/or demonstration would be required. Much of the information available is highly technical and the Committee is attempting to initiate discussion with the universities of Guelph and Manitoba on the development of a joint study at the graduate or Post Doctorate level. Another higher cost option is hiring a consultant, which may produce results in a timelier manner. The involvement of the universities, however, could lead to faster uptake on research results. Manitoba Agriculture Food and Rural Initiatives (MAFRI) has indicated an interest in working in this area from a climate change perspective – and accessing funding through the Growing Forward 2 program may be an option. Another aspect that the Committee must keep in mind is the need and/or opportunity to work with other organizations or groups with similar goals. There are many groups outside our traditional agricultural partners that may wish to work with CFGA including:    

Agriculture – CCA, Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC), BCRC, Canadian Federation of Agriculture, various Round Tables and the CFGA Research Committee Conservation – Ducks Unlimited, NCC and Conservation Districts Government Departments – Agriculture, Conservation, Energy, Healthy Living and Tourism Foundations – The Lake Winnipeg Foundation

By reaching out and determining the type of information these organizations need, the Committee can strengthen its efforts and fine-tune its message. For example in Manitoba, the Committee has engaged the services of an Outreach Coordinator with a Conservation background on a part-time basis. In summary, the Committee has agreed on its purpose, has started assembling an inventory of material on the CFGA web site, is working towards assessing the information available on forages and grasslands, has identified the impact of forages and grasslands on the environment, and has made contact with some potential groups with common interests. CCA and DFC are represented on the CFGA Environment Committee and Committee members have participated on CCA’s Environmental Committee strategy conference calls and at the DFC Environmental Symposium. DU is active on Provincial Forage and Grassland organizations and have spoken at CFGA’s Conference.

18 CFGA Annual Report 2013

9.4 Research and Extension Committee Key Priorities of the Research and Extension Committee for 2014 include:     

Succession and research priorities Understanding the action and availability of inoculants Collaboration Variety registration and performance testing of forage varieties Roundup Ready alfalfa

9.4.1 Succession and Research Priorities Finalize the Research and Advocacy document. Dairy should be included in this strategy in addition to beef and other forage users, and a one-page summary should be included with the document. Committee members agreed to provide input into the development of this document. Committee members were asked to have comments back to Jack Kyle and Leanne Thompson by the end of January 2014. 9.4.2 Understanding the Action and Availability of Inoculants Having inoculants available for legume species is critical if optimum performance is to be achieved. Currently inoculants are not available in Canada for species other than alfalfa and sweet clover. There may be an opportunity to work with the pulse industry in this area. Grant Lastiwka will work with Nora Paulovich and Glenn Friesen to see where the current knowledge is regarding availability, research needs and effectiveness, among other issues. Leanne will contact Fran Wally at the U of Saskatchewan to see what has been done in this area in SK. Leanne and Grant will report to the committee by late January. 9.4.3 Collaboration Collaboration between all personnel with interest in forage/grassland is vital to give the industry a clear voice. This needs to be included in the research priorities. The Committee will develop a list of provincial specialists, (Glenn Friesen and Sarah Sommerfield.) Jack Kyle will check the list of AAFC forager researchers that Duane McCartney developed last year and will check with Leanne Thompson about other research specialists. University personnel should also be included in this listing. There may be an opportunity to develop a webinar for Canadian forage specialists. 9.4.4 Variety Registration and Performance Testing of Forage Varieties Variety registration and performance testing of forage varieties is evolving with a national committee looking at variety performance testing and registration requirements, as the industry moves towards accepting Schedule 3, which has no requirement to generate varietal performance data. The CFGA has a committee developing a performance testing protocol and the Research and Extension Committee is looking forward to reviewing their plan. 9.4.5 Roundup Ready Alfalfa The Committee is proposing to monitor events and activities. Best management practices for co-existence have been developed and printed by Canadian Seed Trade Association and are available at http://cdnseed.org/facilitatingchoice-through-coexistence 9.5 Communication and Promotion The CFGA newsletter continues to be distributed three times per year and CFGA has issued about eight news releases over the past year. Our distribution list is around 1,900 with a reach, which includes the reach of all our partners, of 60,000. CFGA updates its website is regularly and is a key communication tool. CFGA receives requests for hay purchases through the web site, which the Executive Director responds to with an application for hay and hay products, which is then distributed to all exporter members. In the first year after CFGA started tracking website statistics, there were about 1,700 visitors. In 2012, CFGA had 5,135 visits in an 11-month period compared with 5,674 in the same 11month period in 2013, so traffic has increased by about 10 percent. New visitors to the site increased 19 percent, with visitors coming from 28 countries: Canada (74 percent of visits), US (13), India, Nigeria (1), UK, France (0.63) followed by smaller numbers from Australia, Vietnam, Pakistan, Korea and Columbia, among others. Overall, visits from the Americas increased by 8 percent; from Asia, 56 percent; Africa, 152 percent; Europe 3 percent; and Oceania, 60 percent.

19 CFGA Annual Report 2013

While communications can be very strategic, it may be necessary for CFGA’s Committees to develop a set of strategies designed to meet their three main objectives first. At that point, CFGA would develop an overarching strategy and the Communication and Promotion Committee would follow up with the development of a strategic plan. Until then, Communication and Promotions would serve a tactical purpose to support CFGA and its Committee’s strategies. In order to accomplish future strategic objectives, Communication and Promotion would likely need a budget that is substantially larger than is available currently.

10. Other Reports 10.1 CFGA Highlights 2013 10.1.1 Membership Expansion Provincial membership has expanded with the addition of the Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association and CFGA has increased its number of overseas exporting members. 10.1.2 Forage and Grassland Research Strategy Following up on a resolution coming from the 2012 AGM regarding the limited volume of public forage and grassland research in Canada, and the scaling back of our public research capacity, a CFGA Forage and Grassland Research Advocacy Group was formed – and developed an action plan to address these concerns. CFGA has also worked with the Beef Value Chain Round Table and the Beef Cattle Research Council on the Beef Industry Research Strategy, which has resulted in an increased investment in forage breeding and productivity research. CFGA has also had some success in raising awareness and garnering more focus on the importance of forages in beef and dairy production, by both the industry and government. An important component of this initiative has been the development of a “CFGA Strategy for the Future.” The emphasis of the 2013 Conference, Moving Forages Mainstream, would be to focus on research in forage and grasslands 10.1.3 Forage and Grasslands and the Environment CFGA has been striving to create awareness of the value and significance of the forage industry and the benefits of forage and grassland production to agriculture and to the environment. The CFGA and the Environment Committee is providing direction related to forage and grasslands and the environment – with a goal to develop and compile the information required to demonstrate to farmers, industry, consumers and the general public, how forages and grasslands contribute to economic, environmental and social sustainability, both locally and globally. 10.1.4 Canadian Forage Performance Testing Strategy In light of proposed changes in the Seed Act by the CFIA, CFGA is seeking input from forage and rangeland stakeholders on the value of forage variety testing. These proposed changes could bring significant change to the sector as the requirement for merit testing of forage species, which is part of the current registration process, is phased out in late 2013. Should merit testing no longer be required, those registering forages in Canada would no longer need to move new varieties through a standardized varietal performance testing system. Should the industry choose not to replace this system with an alternative set of performance tests, there will be no independent, unbiased data with which to compare commercially available forage varieties in Canada. The CFGA has developed an internet-based survey aimed at those who purchase and utilize forage crops in their businesses. Feedback from end users of forage seed is an essential component for the development of a Canadian forage variety testing strategy. The CFGA views the collection of independent variety performance information as important to sustaining the growth of primary agricultural businesses. The survey has been completed in English and the CFGA has recently developed a French language version of the survey. The CFGA will soon be distributing a letter to forage producers in Québec to increase awareness of this issue and encourage our French-speaking stakeholders to visit the web site to share their opinions. Summarized data from this survey will assist the CFGA in leading discussions on the key information that a testing program must generate in order to meet the needs of those who utilize forage crops in their production systems.

20 CFGA Annual Report 2013

10.1.5 CFGA AgriMarketing Agreement Supports Forage Market Access A three year AgriMarketing Proposal has been approved for 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 to assist the CFGA Forage Export and Domestic Market Development Committee with initiatives in the areas of:     

Export market readiness training US market development and emerging market development Chinese market access Japanese market development Cross-sectoral collaboration in the development of forage and feed packages

10.1.6 Fact Finding Mission to the US The mission in February 2013 included an assessment of the opportunities and challenges for Canadian exporters in the American northern and southern plains. 10.1.7 Export Committee Addresses Key Issues The Committee continues to monitor and provide input on such items as the development of timothy protocol for China and addressing issues in the alfalfa protocol with China. The Committee has also provided input on transportation and logistics issues, mandatory shipping regulations and cash advance programs for alfalfa and timothy. 10.1.8 Partnership Development Key to the ongoing sustainability of the CFGA is the development of partnerships. In 2013 this has included: 

 

CFGA – New Holland (NH) Partnership  Over the course of several meetings CFGA and NH have considered a “Menu of Opportunities” for partnering  A “Purchase Incentive Program” has been developed and is now being considered by NH NH supports the CFGA Leadership Award  NH has agreed to provide support of $10,000 annually for three years in support of the CFGA Leadership Award CFGA – Farm Business Communications (FBC) Partnership  The CFGA is very pleased to be collaborating with FBC to promote the production, best management practices, research and innovation, market development, and benefits of forages and grasslands in Canada while at the same time profiling CFGA. This initiative will include annually: o Feature Five Full Page CFGA columns in Country Guide (National), Canadian Cattlemen (National) and Le Bulletin des agriculteurs (Québec). o An Annual Forage and Grassland Guide will be published in March in all three magazines.

Other potential partnerships are being pursued. 10.2 Minutes of CFGA Annual General Meeting - December 12, 2012 CFGA strengthening the national forage and grassland sector and playing a key role in moving the industry mainstream. Held at the Pomeroy Hotel, Olds Alberta. 1:15 – 1:45 pm 1:45 – 2:00 pm 2:00 – 3:00 pm

3:00- 3:30 pm 3:30 – 3:45 pm 4:00 – 4:15 pm 4:15 – 4:30 pm 4:30 – 4:45 pm 4:45 – 5:00 pm

Welcome and overview of CFGA – Doug Wray, Chair CFGA Highlights of 2013 – CFGA Executive Director The CFGA/ACPF in Action (Committee reports)  Producers & Users Committee  Forage Export and Domestic Market Development Committee  Research and Extension  CFGA and the Environment  Communication and Promotions  Finance and Sponsorship Breakout groups – Feedback on priorities, action and areas of emphasis Financial report Resolutions Election/Appointment of CFGA/ACPF Board of Directors Appointment of Auditor and Resolutions Wrap-up – Doug Wray, Chair

21 CFGA Annual Report 2013

Welcome and overview of CFGA – Doug Wray, Chair CFGA  Chair Doug Wray called the meeting to order and welcomed everyone to the AGM  German LeFebvre, on behalf of Le Conseil Québécois des Plantes Fourragères (CQPF) (Québec Forage Council) invited the group to Quebec for the CFGA Conference and AGM in 2014  Doug reviewed the agenda.  Doug introduced the Board of Directors. All Board members present except Bill Letondre, Chad Anderson and David Wiens. Highlights of 2013 – Ron Pidskalny, CFGA Executive Director  Details are included in the CFGA 2013 Annual Report The CFGA/ACPF in Action (Committee reports)  All Committees provided reports, which are included in the CFGA 2013 Annual Report Breakout groups – Feedback on priorities, action and areas of emphasis AGM participants divided into breakout groups to provide feedback to CFGA on priorities and direction for the organization. Each group was asked to provide three priorities for the coming year, outline three tactics for each priority and identify an individual who would be responsible and accountable for accomplishing each tactic. Details are provided in the CFGA 2013 Annual Report. Financial report  Chris Yuzdepski joined the meeting by conference call and presented the financial report  All financial statements are included in the CFGA Annual Report for 2013  Motion to accept the financial report as presented – Moved by Leanne Thompson, seconded by Garth Healey, carried Resolutions There was one resolution brought forward at the AGM from the CFGA and the Environment Committee: WHEREAS there is value in the recognition of environmental value by an environmental group; and WHEREAS society needs to be convinced of its obligation to support the environmental value contributed through the good stewardship of the forage and rangeland resources of agricultural landowners; and WHEREAS an independent, well respected and trusted environmental group could help improve the recognition of the value of the environmental goods and services contributed to society by CFGA’s stakeholders: Now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED that the CFGA engage in a selection process and establish a formal partnership with an appropriate conservation group to help recognize the environmental value of forage and grassland production. Motion to accept the resolution by Trevor Forbes, seconded by Lyndon Mansell, carried. Election/Appointment of CFGA/ACPF Board of Directors The following Directors were elected and/or appointed for a two-year term December 2012 at the 2012 AGM:        

Germaine Lefebvre Ray Robertson Doug Wray Jack Kyle Trevor Forbes Leanne Thompson Cathy Sharp Henry Nelson

22 CFGA Annual Report 2013

Québec Forage Council Ontario Forage Council Alberta Forage Industry Network Chair, CFGA Research and Extension Committee Soil and Crop Improvement Association of Nova Scotia Saskatchewan Forage Council (effective Jan 1, 2012) Canadian Cattlemen’s Association Manitoba Forage Council

The following Director additions/changes have occurred since the 2012 AGM:      

Chad Anderson was appointed to the Board representing the Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association Pat Rutledge replaced Cathy Sharp as Canadian Cattlemen’s Association representative Pat Rutledge will serve as the as Canadian Cattlemen’s Association representative to CFGA until their annual meeting the first week of March 2014. CCA will announce Pat’s successor at that meeting. Christian Duchesneau replaced Germaine Lefebvre as the representative of the CQPF Russ Mellow replaced Marc Lavioe as the Overseas Exporter Representative Bill Letondre resigned as Chair, CFGA Produces and Users Committee. A replacement is pending.

The following Directors were elected/appointed for a two year term December 2013 at the 2013 AGM:    

Russ Mellow Overseas Exporter Representative Darren Chapman US Exporter and Domestic Market Representative David Wiens Dairy Farmers of Canada representative Garth Healey BC Forage Council



CFGA has received notification that the Dairy Farmers of Canada and the BC Forage Council that both organizations will continue with their current CFGA representatives At the CFGA Exporters Committee meeting at the 2013 Conference, the US Exporters appointed Russ Mellow as their new representative to the Board



Therefore at the CFGA AGM in 2013 the following Directors are currently in place:             

Christian Duchesneau Québec Forage Council Ray Robertson (V Chair) Ontario Forage Council Doug Wray (Chair) Alberta Forage Industry Network Jack Kyle (Executive) Chair, CFGA Research and Extension Committee Trevor Forbes Soil and Crop Improvement Association of Nova Scotia Leanne Thompson Saskatchewan Forage Council (effective Jan 1, 2012) Pat Rutledge Canadian Cattlemen’s Association (until the first week of March 2014) Henry Nelson Manitoba Forage Council Chad Anderson Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association Russ Mellow (Executive) Overseas Exporter Representative Darren Chapman US Exporter and Domestic Market Representative (reappointed) David Wiens Dairy Farmers of Canada representative (reappointed) Garth Healey BC Forage Council (reappointed)



The position of Chair, CFGA Produces and Users Committee (Executive) will need to be filled

Appointment of Auditor Motion to appoint the current auditor, Rosanna Sternat of Selkirk, Manitoba for 2014 – Moved by Ray Robertson, seconded by Jack Kyle, carried Wrap-up – Doug Wray, Chair  A suggestion was made that Committee reports be prepared before the CFGA AGM in 2014 and distributed prior to the AGM  Motion to accept the offer from German LeFebvre, on behalf of CQPF to host the CFGA Conference and AGM in Québec in 2014 – moved by Ray Robertson, seconded by Garth Healey, carried

23 CFGA Annual Report 2013

10.3 Finance and Sponsorship 10.3.1 Balance Sheet (as of 30 November 2013)

24 CFGA Annual Report 2013

10.3.2 Profit & Loss (April through November 2013)

25 CFGA Annual Report 2013

10.3.3 Profit & Loss by Activity (April through November 2013)

26 CFGA Annual Report 2013

10.3.4 Financial Statements (for the year ended March 31, 2013 – unaudited)

27 CFGA Annual Report 2013

28 CFGA Annual Report 2013

29 CFGA Annual Report 2013

30 CFGA Annual Report 2013

31 CFGA Annual Report 2013

32 CFGA Annual Report 2013

33 CFGA Annual Report 2013

34 CFGA Annual Report 2013

35 CFGA Annual Report 2013

36 CFGA Annual Report 2013