biomass
TO OBSERVE FOREST BIOMASS FOR A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE CARBON CYCLE
BIOMASS Mission Assessment Group Heiko Balzter Thuy Le Toan (Chair)
University of Leicester, UK Centre d’Etudes Spatiale de la Biosphère, Toulouse, F Philippe Paillou University of Bordeaux, Floirac, F Kostas Papathanassiou German Aerospace Center, Wessling, D Stephen Plummer IGBP, Frascati, I Shaun Quegan University of Sheffield, UK Fabio Rocca Politecnico di Milano, I Lars Ulander FOI, Linköping, S Hank Shugart University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA Sassan Saatchi Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, USA Science Coordinator: Malcolm Davidson Technical Coordinators: Alan Thompson, Chung-Chi Lin
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
2
Global atmospheric CO2 fluxes 9
Carbon flux (Gt C / Yr)
8
Fossil fuel emissions Change in atmospheric CO2
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Year
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
3
Global atmospheric CO2 fluxes 9
Carbon flux (Gt C / Yr)
8
Fossil fuel emissions Change in atmospheric CO2
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Year
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
4
BIOMASS Primary science objectives Objective
Product
Greatly improve current estimates of forest carbon stocks
Consistent global maps of forest biomass and height at scale of 100 m
Reduce uncertainty in deforestation emissions to a level comparable to uncertainty in net ocean flux
Map annual reductions in biomass globally
Improve estimates of terrestrial carbon sinks from regrowth and reforestation
Map increases in biomass globally across mission lifetime
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
5
The global carbon cycle for the 1990s Estimates of total biomass vary from 39 to 93 GtC
Addressed by BIOMASS Values from IPCC 2007. Units: Gigatons of carbon/ yr User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
6
The mean global carbon cycle for the 1990s 9 8 7
High
High
Land use change flux
Residual land sink
Low Low
GtC/year
6 5 4 3
Fossil fuel emissions
2
Net ocean sink
Atmospheric increase
1
Anthropogenic Sources
Changes in C pools
User Consultation Consultation Meeting, Meeting, Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, Portugal, 20-21 20-21 January January 2009 2009 User
biomass
7
The importance of forest biomass in the carbon cycle • Biomass is a proxy for carbon (Carbon ~ 0.5 x Biomass) • Forests account for most of the Earth’s vegetation biomass • Changes in forest biomass with time correspond to carbon fluxes – Loss = Emissions – Growth = Uptake
• Forest biomass is very poorly known and is a major source of uncertainty in carbon flux estimation Biomass = dry weight of woody matter + leaves (tons/ha) User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
8
International context and users • GCOS/IPCC – Biomass is an Essential Climate Variable within the Global Climate Observing System
• UNFCCC – Post-2012 Kyoto Protocol: sources and sinks due to Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry – Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD)
• UN Food and Agriculture Organisation – Global Forest Resources Assessments
• UN Convention on Biological Diversity • ESA Living Planet Strategy – BIOMASS addresses all four land challenges
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
9
What is known about forest biomass at global scale? • UN Global Forest Resources Assessment – Main source of information on global forest carbon stocks – Issued every 5 years – Based on national statistics – 1 value of biomass per country
• FRA limitations – – – – –
No spatial distribution of biomass Inconsistent Incomplete (missing countries) Biased No error reporting
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
10
What is known about biomass at regional scales? Model + Satellite Interpolation Model
Land cover map
Interpolation44
Brown
Defries
Brown and Lugo
Olson
Potter
Fearnside
Carbon (tC/ha)
Estimates of total biomass vary from 39 to 93 GtC
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
150 tons/ha)
•
RMSE = 1.37 dB r2 = 0.82
Boreal Forest Temperate Forest Tropical Forest 0
100
200
300
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
15
Sensitivity of P-band SAR to disturbance and regrowth Polarimetric P-band SAR image of Yellowstone Park (2003)
A week after burn P-HV = - 27 dB
60-80 years after burn P-HV = - 12 dB
15 years after burn P-HV = - 19 dB
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
16
Estimated biomass (t/ha) Retrievedbiomass (ton/ha)
Forest biomass retrieval at P-band 150
Les Landes
250
RMSE = 9.46 t/ha
200
In situ biomass (t/ha)
Estimated biomass (t/ha) Estimated biomass (ton/ha)
150
`300
100
Biomass (t/ha)
0In-situ stand biomass (ton/ha) 150
50
RMSE = 47.2 t/ha
0
`300
In situ biomass (ton/ha) (t/ha) In situ biomass
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
Remningstorp
biomass
17
Improving retrieval using polarisation & height Biomass (t/ha)
Polarised intensities only
250
200
Intensity retrieval
150 100
RMSE= 35.6 t/ha
50
Intensity + height
Height (m) 40
30
Height retrieval
20
10
RMSE= 16.3 t/ha
0m
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
18
Height from Polarimetric SAR Interferometry S1
S2 50
25
0m
Amplitude Image L- HH
Volume Coherence
Forest Height Map
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
19
Why P-band for forest height? Scatterer motion causes biases in height estimates from Pol-InSAR
30-day repeat
1cm Height Error 50m
3cm
5cm
C
L
25m P P
0m
26-day coherence User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
20
P-band forest height retrieval – tropical forest • Height measurement has been demonstrated at P-band during the ESA INDREX-II airborne campaign in Indonesia • Height retrieval was validated with independent lidar height measurements Mawas, Indonesia
50 40 30 20 10 0m
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
21
Product Specification BIOMASS is designed with the following goals: Level-2 Product
Properties
Forest biomass
< 20% error; 100m - 200m resolution; 2 maps/year; global forest coverage
Forest biomass change
< 20% error;100 - 200m resolution; annual; global forest coverage
Forest disturbance
Disturbance maps: 90% accuracy; 50m resolution (major disturbances); 200m resolution (partial disturbances);1 per 2 months or seasonal; global forest coverage
Forest height
< 20-30% error; 100x100m resolution; 1 map/year; global forest coverage
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
22
Mission performance: Speckle • Study of biomass retrieval performance based on: – Global functional relationship between radar backscatter and forest biomass – Pol-InSAR height inversion – Uncertainties (radar backscatter, height estimate) – Bayesian inversion
• Results indicate that accuracy goal of 20% can be achieved
HV polarisation
HV, HH & Height
128 256
20% accuracy goal
512
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
23
Mission performance: Ionospheric effects Scintillation
Faraday Rotation
Rotation of the polarisation plane: FR can be corrected to better than 1º by well-known methods using polarimetric data. In the process, Total Electron Content is measured.
Scintillations can cause defocusing. Autofocus correction has already been demonstrated in the equatorial case. Full processing methodologies will be developed in Phase A.
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
24
Data utilisation concept
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
25
Data utilisation – carbon emission calculation Current basic concept for exploiting biomass in carbon emission calculations: Cem = Deforested area x “average” biomass (UNFCCC Good Practice Guide 2003) BIOMASS concept: Cem = Σi ∆Bi Key additional point: Biomass changes slowly in undisturbed forest. Hence the biomass values derived by BIOMASS can be applied long after the end of the mission. BIOMASS measurements will have a long legacy.
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
26
Data utilisation – carbon cycle data assimilation Geo-referenced Geo-referenced emissions emissionsinventories inventories
Climate and weather fields
Ocean time series Biogeochemical pCO2 Surface observation pCO2 nutrients Water column inventories
Atmospheric Atmospheric measurements measurements
Remote Remote sensing sensing of of atmospheric atmospheric CO CO22
Atmospheric Atmospheric Transport Transport Model Model
Ocean Ocean Carbon Carbon Model Model Coastal Coastal studies studies
Optimised Optimised fluxes fluxes
Terrestrial Terrestrial Carbon Carbon Model Model rivers Lateral fluxes
Integrated Data Global Carbon assimilation Observation System link (Ciais et al 2003) Optimised Optimised model model parameters parameters
Eddy-covariance flux towers Biomass soil carbon inventories Ecological studies
Ocean remote sensing Ocean colour Altimetry Winds SST SSS
Remote sensing of vegetation properties Growth cycle Fires Biomass Radiation Land cover/use
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
27
Links to other missions
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
28
Mission architecture overview GROUND SEGMENT
CO2
C
SUBJECT Terrestrial carbon stock/carbon fluxes by measurement of forest biomass
Flight Operations Segment 1 TT&C Station (Kiruna), S-Band Flight Operation Control Center (ESOC)
Payload Data Ground Segment 1 Science Data Acquisition Station (Svalbard) Processing and Archiving Element (ESRIN)
Auxiliary Data Land cover maps Digital Elevation Models USER SEGMENT Carbon cycle modellers/Research Centres
BIOMASS Mission Elements
LAUNCHER Soyuz/Vega
SPACE SEGMENT Single Spacecraft, 1200 - 2600 kg, 800 - 1200W Payload: P-band SAR 5 year lifetime
ORBIT Sun-synchronous, local time 05:00, 640 km, 27 to 39-day repeat cycle
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
29
Orbit Determining factors • 25 to 45 day revisit • Global forest coverage • SAR swath width & radiometric performance • Minimise ionospheric disturbance • Avoid excessive air drag • Interferometric baseline
Example coverage after 13 days
• Sun-synchronous dawn-dusk orbit • local time ~ 05:00 • altitude ~ 640 km Example coverage after 27 days User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
30
Orbit – interferometric baseline Selection of “controlled drift” orbit (non-exact repeat)
Orbit i Cycle n
Orbit height h
Orbit drift
Ground track i Cycle n Ground track i Cycle n+1
ϑ
Orbit i Cycle n+1
Baseline B (exaggerated)
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
31
Observation geometry Reflector SAR antenna
Orbit
Elongated SAR antenna Sub-satellite track
≥ 25° Nadir point
Nadir point
Antenna footprints
Sub-swath 1 Sub-swath 2 Antenna footprint
Stripmap swath
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
32
Instrument – Concept 1 • Planar array on Snapdragon platform • Four passive antenna panels folded around three hinges (77.6 m2 aperture) • 10 sub-arrays per panel • 18 Solid State Power Amplifiers distributed behind the inner panels • 320 W total peak RF-power • 102 km polarimetric swath
2.82m 27.5m User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
33
Instrument – Concept 2 • Planar array on conventional platform • Central panel attached to the platform with two wings of four deployable, selfsupporting panels (65.9 m2 aperture) • Six solid state power amplifiers feeding six elevation rows of radiators Upper metallisation (CFRP)
Annular slot Feed-lines
• 300 W total peak RF-power • 70 km polarimetric swath
Dielectric honeycomb
Adhesive layers
Dielectric honeycomb
Ground plane (CFRP)
20.16 m 3.36 m
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
34
Instrument – Concept 3 • Deployable reflector on conventional platform (14.7 m x 9.6 m aperture) • 4 x 2 elements array-feed with beam-switching • Four Solid State Power Amplifiers feeding four elevation pairs of radiators • 300 W total peak RF-power • 2 x 60 km polarimetric swaths (dual-beam)
Array-feed with 4 pairs of patch radiators in elevation
Engineering Qualification Model of 12 m diameter reflector User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
35
Instrument block diagram Central electronics
SSPA
Signal Generation & Upconversion
USO
Power divider
Down & A/D conversion H
Bus power
Instrument power unit
V H
Switching network
LO V
Data
V H
V
V
H
H
Power combiner
Circulator & signal routing unit
Passive V Antenna
H
Power combiner Instrument control unit
Low noise amplifiers
Telemetry and Telecommand User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
36
Satellite configurations 9.6 m
Concept 1 14.7 m
Concept 3 27.5 m 20.2 m
Concept 2 2.8 m
3.4 m Mass Data storage
1200-2600 kg 400-700 Gb
Power Data Downlink
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
800-1200 W 260-290 Mb/s
biomass
37
Stowed configurations in launcher fairings
Concept 1 in Soyuz
Concept 2 in Soyuz Concept 3 in Vega
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
38
Ground Segment
• Re-use of existing ESA Multi-Mission infrastructure • Single station (Svalbard or Kiruna) for reception of scientific data • Provision for auxiliary data
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
39
Performance summary 1/2
Compliant with science requirements User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
40
Performance summary 2/2
Threshold
Goal
MEETS REQUIREMENT
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
41
Programmatics 1/2 • Satellite development – Concept 1 benefits from TerraSAR-L heritage – Concept 2 is based on a conventional platform and benefits from Radarsat-2, Cosmo/Skymed and Sentinel-1 heritage – Concept 3 is based on a conventional platform; further work in Phase A to confirm accommodation in Vega
• Antenna and accommodation – All concepts have a simple passive structure – Feasibility of large deployable planar array antennas is addressed through ESA technology programmes – An Engineering Model, relevant to Concept 3, has been developed for a telecommunications programme – Breadboarding of a P-band feed-array is in progress
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
42
Programmatics 2/2 • Radar electronics – All elements of the radar electronics are based on mature technology – A P-band Solid State Power Amplifier assessment study was initiated in spring 2008
• End-to-end calibration – Instrument calibration benefits from heritage in several SAR missions – Ionospheric correction algorithms exist and their detailed performance will be assessed in Phase A
• Development schedule – Final choice of the antenna concept will determine the payload development approach
Provided a suitable pre-development programme is started in Phase A, payload and satellite development is considered feasible for launch during 2016. User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
43
Conclusions • BIOMASS addresses major uncertainties in the global carbon cycle. It will: – Greatly improve current estimates of forest carbon stocks – Reduce uncertainty in deforestation emissions to a level comparable to the uncertainty in net ocean flux – Improve estimates of terrestrial carbon sinks from regrowth and reforestation uptake
• The global multi-temporal datasets it provides have long-term scientific, environmental and societal importance • The BIOMASS measurement concept has been extensively demonstrated by airborne campaigns. • First opportunity to explore the Earth’s surface at P-Band • Selection to one mission in 2011- Earliest possible launch in 2016
User Consultation Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 20-21 January 2009
biomass
44