Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations for Sustainable Development Best Southwest Cities Transportation Committee Luncheon June 19, 2008
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department
Presentation Outline 1. NCTCOG Introduction 2. Sustainable Development 3. Context Sensitive Solutions 4. Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department
What is the Council of Governments?
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department The Regional Transportation Council (RTC), comprised primarily of local elected officials, is the independent regional transportation policy body associated with NCTCOG. As the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), NCTCOG and the RTC are responsible for the planning and implementation of transportation programs and projects aimed at reducing congestion, improving mobility and improving air quality. Staff support to NCTCOG and the RTC is provided by the Transportation Department.
Sustainable Development Program Area General Sustainable Development
Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordination
Demographics
Transit Oriented Development/Brownfields
Regional Population Total 16 – County 2008 Estimate
6,560,000 PERSONS 8,000,000
6,560,000
7,000,000
6,075,000
6,000,000
5,300,000
5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000
4,111,750 3,116,181 1980
1990
2000
2005
2008
For Transportation Improvements: Rail HOV/Managed Lanes Tollways Freeways
2007
Intelligent Transportation Systems
Demographic Changes: 2.6 million additional persons 1.6 million new jobs
2030
Growth Affects Important Assets Energy Water Supply Water Quality
Open Spaces
Air Quality Storm Water Management Urban Forest
Air Quality
Agricultural Lands
A Transportation Perspective Regional Constraints… Population Growth Congestion and Travel Times Air Quality Non-Attainment Area
…and Opportunities Promotion of Healthy Communities Sustainable Development Initiatives
The Regional Transportation Council’s Sustainable Development Policy Utilize Existing System Capacity
Single use area type, non-transit, connected to existing infrastructure
Infill rail
Infill mixed use with rail access
Infill mixed use
Promote Mixed Use
Commuter rail/light rail in single use areas
Improve Rail Mobility
Mixed use with rail
Stand alone mixed use
Improve Access Management Shared drives/parking, spacing of turns/signals
Creating Sustainable Communities Encourage Active Living Educate the public on the causes and effects of inactivity Engage multiple disciplines; health, planning, transportation, fitness, education and government Implement zoning that encourages mixed-use land development patterns and access to transit Implement Smart Growth/New Urbanism/Transit Oriented Development strategies
Context Sensitive Solutions What is it? Started in 1969 and really gained its momentum in the 1990’s. The creation of projects which improve transportation while focusing on preserving the environment, beauty, and safety of the location. Requires an early and continuous commitment to public involvement, flexibility in exploring new solutions, and an openness to new ideas.
Context Sensitive Solutions Key Principles Set and maintain goals involving mobility, safety, environment, and community. Before
Trolley construction
After
Good relationships and good communication is established between all people involved including stakeholders and transportation officials. Involve the community in the planning and assessment of all means of transportation. Both during and after the project, the construction shall remain in sync with the community and should exceed expectations of both the designers and the residents of the area.
Context Sensitive Solutions Creating Sustainable Communities
Increasing Land Use Mix Decreasing VMT/HH Illustration of a gradient of development patterns ranging from rural in Context Zone 1 (C-1) to the most urban in C-6. CSS principles are applied in relation to the specific zone in which a project is located. Source: ITE CSS Recommended Practice, pg. 45
Context Sensitive Solutions Features that Create Context Land Use Defines urban activity Major factor in design criteria Site Design Arrangement of buildings, circulation, parking and landscape Vehicle or pedestrian-orientation Building Design Height, massing shape context Create enclosure/pedestrian interest
Context Sensitive Solutions Streetscaping
Streetscape Improvements, Mountain View, CA
Before
After (including more parking, fewer traffic lanes, wider sidewalks, and landscaping)
Can include road cross sections, traffic management, sidewalk conditions, landscaping, street furniture, building fronts, and materials specifications. Leads to increased property value and increased public health (from more walking and cycling).
Corresponds with New Urbanism which is about making communities more attractive, efficient, and livable. Can be integrated with roadway maintenance, building construction projects, and special projects such as landscaping updates.
Context Sensitive Solutions Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Possible • Improvement of nonmotorized facility management and safety concerns maintenance
• Better pedestrian accessibility • More livable community/ “walkable” community
Clear routes
•Better paths, bike lanes, and parking •Safety education •Integration with transit •Multi-modal access guide (How to get to specific destinations via bike)
• More accommodations for the mobility impaired
Context Sensitive Solutions Traffic Calming Goal: To reduce traffic speed and volume.
Speed Table
Can range from minor alterations of single road to redesign of entire road network. Often involves reallocating road space. Usually implemented through local engineering departments. Result: Tends to reduce total vehicle mileage via improving walking and cycling conditions. Sample Size
Speed impacts of traffic calming measures
Avg. Speed Afterward (mph)
Avg. Speed Change
Avg. % Change
12' Humps
179
27.4
-7.6
-22
14' Humps
15
25.6
-7.7
-23
22' Tables
58
30.1
-6.6
-18
Longer Tables
10
31.6
-3.2
-9
Raised Intersections
3
34.3
-0.3
-1
Circles
45
30.2
-3.9
-11
Narrowings
7
32.3
-2.6
-4
Half Closures
16
26.3
-6.0
-19
Diagonal Diverters
7
27.9
-1.4
-0.5
Context Sensitive Solutions Location Efficient Development Residential and commercial development leading to the maximum accessibility and affordability. Example: Redeveloping inner-city neighborhoods and converting old buildings into loft apartments. Capability to provide substantial energy savings as well as reduce pollution. Consumers shift spending from transportation purposes to more general consumer goods. Benefit Summary Objective
Rating
Comments
Congestion Reduction
2
Reduces per-household automobile travel in higher-density areas.
Road & Parking Savings
3
Reduces per-household automobile travel.
Consumer Savings
3
Increases housing affordability. Reduces vehicle and parking costs.
Transport Choice
3
Improves consumer housing and transport choices.
Road Safety
2
Reduces per-household automobile travel.
Environmental Protection
3
Reduces per-household automobile ownership and use, and reduces sprawl.
Efficient Land Use
3
Encourages higher-density location choice.
Community Livability
3
Encourages urban infill by middle-class families, reduced car ownership and use.
Ratings 0 (no change) to 3 (very beneficial)
Context Sensitive Solutions Design Examples
Illustration of the elements of a context sensitive thoroughfare Source: ITE CSS Recommended Practice, pg. 56
Context Sensitive Improvements Green Oaks Boulevard, Arlington
Current, 2008
Re-envisioned
Context Sensitive Design Controlled Speeds and Lane Widths
Standard DFW Design
North Richland Hills Hometown
Context Sensitive Design Facilities with Character
Standard DFW Design
State Thomas, Las Colinas
Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department
Bicycle and Pedestrian Communities Create pedestrian-friendly land use patterns by promoting: Through Streets and Connectivity Compact Developments Short Blocks Street Grids Narrow Streets On-street Parking Pedestrian Amenities, such as crosswalks, sidewalks, lighting, seating, buffers, maintenance, signage, landscaping In a community of 100,000, if residents replaced just one car trip with one bike trip once a month for a year, each resident would reduce CO2 emissions by 3,762 tons. 3,762 tons of CO2 emission reduction is equivalent to the capacity of 2,846 acres of forest storing carbon for 1 year or 87,555 seedlings growing for 10 years. Source: Complete Streets
Regional Connectivity Regional Veloweb A 644-mile interconnected network of off-street trails designed to provide safe, efficient mobility to pedestrians, cyclists, and in-line skaters.
Design Considerations: • Concrete surface • Design speed of 25 miles per hour • Recommended width of 12 feet to accommodate a variety of users • Grade separated crossings • Few, if any, signalized or stop sign intersections • Easy access from roadways, particularly on-street bicycle routes
Creating Sustainable Communities Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Districts Within all rail corridors and all existing and planned stations, there are bicycle and pedestrian districts.
Considerations for Districts • Street Pattern–Grid street patterns allow walking and cycling for short trips • Land Use–Integrated and mixed land uses promote walking and cycling • Proximity to Rail Stations • Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs Indices ¾ Medium income 2 I ¾ Population density ¾ Employment density ¾ Percentage of transit trips ¾ Percentage of trips five miles or less
1/4 Mile
1/4 Mile #
#
2 I
Regional Veloweb Accessible Right-Of-Way Utility Corridor Rail Corridor
Cottonbelt Trail, North Richland Hills Preston Ridge Trail at McDermott Drive, Plano
Multi-Neighborhood Connectivity Katy Trail, Dallas
Bicycle & Pedestrian Considerations Current Conditions, Identified in Mobility 2030 1. Current infrastructure is insufficient for bicyclists and pedestrians in the region. 2. Varied knowledge levels and education programs about safe and effective habits exist among bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists, and law enforcement agencies. 3. There is a lack of end-of-trip facilities (showers, parking, changing facilities).
Bicycle & Pedestrian Considerations Sign Design
Direction, Destination, and Distance Signage
Bicycle & Pedestrian Considerations Divided Trail
Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Minneapolis, MN
6’ + 3’ 12 ‘
Bicycle & Pedestrian Considerations Divided Trail
Katy Trail, Dallas Peak Weekday Traffic Count – 2,467 trips (2002)
Bicycle & Pedestrian Considerations Construction Materials and Raised Pathways
Natural construction materials aid in preserving character of the surroundings. Slightly raised pathways can protect the natural habitat.
Bicycle & Pedestrian Considerations On-Street Lanes Road Diet
Sharrow
Marked Bike Lane 1st St., Fort Worth
Morriss Road/Cross Timbers, Flower Mound
Bicycle & Pedestrian Considerations London Cycle Network
A 900km (560 mi) strategic network of radial and orbital routes
Bicycle & Pedestrian Considerations Divided Traffic Lanes
Divided bike lane, Copenhagen, Denmark
Shared center bus/bike lane Paris, France
MONIQUE PL
DA
R
82
HI
13
LL
RD
LANGSTON DR
M 82 F 13 CLARK RD
ST
TZ
RA
US
AN
to
cy
Up
vd Bl
an No l
New City Hall
PHILLIP DR
67
HOOD DR
BELT LINE RD
67
MERRIFIELD DR CEDAR ST
TEXAS ST
67
CHURCH ST
Old City Hall
CARR ST
MAIN ST
HOUSTON ST
SQ
B ROA D S T
HASWELL ST
NE
WYLIE ST
W
BROAD ST
TO
BRYANT ST
Dr
CHAMBERS ST
ROBERTS RD
67
DR
wn
n Cl a
ECC A
CLARK RD
REB
ACRES ST
67
KR
RD
CE
HENDRICKS ST
Cedar Hill City Hall Trail Connection
CLARK RD
CINDY DR
FM
LISA LN
BRIGGS DR
What is your vision for the Southwest Cities?
67
Funding Opportunities Additional Funding Sources Safe Routes to School Program Funded through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). TxDOT is facilitating the distribution of a $40 million grant for the planning, development, and implementation of projects that encourage walking and bicycling to and from schools in Texas. In September, 2007, $24.8 million was awarded to Texas districts. A second call is anticipated in 2008 to program the remaining funds.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Recreational Trails Fund The National Recreational Trails Fund is administered by Texas Parks and Wildlife in coordination with the FHWA. Eligible project types include: the construction of new recreational trails, improvement of existing trails, development of trailheads or trailside facilities, and acquiring property for trail corridors.
Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program (STEP) Administered by TxDOT. Funding is available for transportation-related activities contributing to quality communities, preserving the environment, encouraging multimodal travel, and enhancing the aesthetics of roadways.
Funding Opportunities NCTCOG Funding Sustainable Development Call For Projects, 2001 and 2005-2006 Eligible project types: Infrastructure, Land Banking, Center of Development Excellence, and Sustainable Development projects. More than $16.9 million awarded to projects with bicycle and pedestrian elements in 2005. The next call for projects is anticipated in 2008-2009, with a deadline of May 29, 2009.
Local Government Air Quality Program, 2006 Eligible project types: traffic signals, bicycle/pedestrian connections, park-and-ride programs, air quality outreach and marketing programs, vanpool programs, other air quality control strategy projects. Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects received more than $9 million in funding.
Regional Tollway Revenue Funding Initiative, 2007 $2.5 billion in toll proceeds from State Highway 121 will be allocated to fund roadway, transit, air quality, cost overrun, safety, sustainable development, and bicycle and pedestrian projects. 41 of the 561 projects submitted requested $ 85,487,097 in funding for bicycle and pedestrian specific projects.
Contact Information Karla Weaver, AICP
[email protected] (817) 608-2376 Jen Ebel
[email protected] (817) 695-9255
www.nctcog.org/trans/programs/sustdev.asp