Behavioral Programs in the Shelter: Out of Kennel Training Alexandra (Sasha) Protopopova, MS, PhD, CPDT-KA Texas Tech University Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Learning Outcomes 1. Summarize previous research on out of kennel training 2. Identify the challenges in this research 3. Recognize several out-of-kennel behaviors that improve adoption 4. Conduct a validated behavioral program at the shelter
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Choice while at the shelter In-kennel selection
Out-of-kennel selection
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Luescher & Medlock, 2009 Control (n = 88) Experimental (n = 92) Gentle Leader No-pulling Sit on command No jumping on approaching person outside of the kennel
Trainer gave treats to non-barking dogs Staff gave treats
Percentage of Dogs
20 min outside training sessions 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Euthanized Adopted
Trained
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Control
Social Behavior Training increased adoption rates (Luescher & Medlock, 2009) Sociability most important factor (Sternberg, 2003) Gazing as a social behavior (Miklosi et al., 2000) Can be placed under operant control (Bentosela et al., 2008)
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Experimental Design Training Group n= 60
Adoptable dogs
Feeding Group n= 60 Control Group n= 60
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Adoption
Outcome
Rescue
Euthanasia
Improvements on Methodology Staff and volunteers are blind to dogs’ group placement Feeding Group Controls for simply taking dogs out of kennel and feeding them
Trained for generalization Alternated trainers Relevant location
Video analysis Validating training Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Acquisition Data
Percent of looks over 2.5 s
Feeding
Training
100 80 60 40 20 0 Day 1
Day 7
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Day 1
Day 7
Social Training-No Effect on Adoption Rate 0.8 Proportion of dogs
0.7 0.6 0.5
Control
0.4
Feeding
0.3
Training
0.2
0.1 0.0 Adopted
Euthanized
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Rescued
Dog training in the shelter Is it possible to increase adoption through training? Obedience training improved adoption Luescher & Medlock, 2009
Social training did not improve adoption Protopopova et al., 2012
Deductive versus inductive approach Inductive: observation theory
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
A different point of view Animal welfare perspective DOG CENTERED APPROACH
Consumer choice perspective HUMAN CENTERED APPROACH
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Human centered approach Kinds of questions: What do people want in dogs? How can we “sell” our product? Shelter versus pet store
Ensuring a quality product Return rates
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
“Hidden” agenda Decreasing euthanasia rates/ long stays at the shelter
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
What do consumers want? Not straight forward! What is choice? Entering your shelter, looking longer at dog, taking dog out of kennel, adoption, keeping the current dog How do we measure choice? 1. Retrospective studies 2. Surveys 3. Observational methods 4. Experimental designs
Does everyone want the same kind of dog?
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
How about out-of-kennel selection? Survey (Weiss et al., 2012) What did the dogs do right before adoption? ANSWER: Approached and greeted Licked Jumped on them Wagged their tails
What about observational research? Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Out-of-Kennel Selection We observed 250 interactions between potential adopters and shelter dogs Aims: 1. Can we find behaviors that increase likelihood of adoption? 2. Can we find behaviors that impede adoption? 3. Are there other non-behavioral variables that are important?
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Methods Alachua County Animal Services 250 interactions 151 different dogs and 154 potential adoptive families
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Data collection Followed potential adopter Filmed entire interaction until adoption/ nonadoption decision reached Video coded on ethogram 25% double coded
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Behavior Accepting Petting Rejecting Petting Human Toy Play
Operational Definition Dog does not walk away when person touches or strokes dog Dog walks or darts away when person reaches for dog Dog engages with toy that is held by person or runs towards the toy when it is thrown and brings back to person
Ignoring Play Initiation Independent Toy Play Human Play
Dog walks away or otherwise ignores initiation of play by person (through toy or body) Dog engages with toy away from the person
Attending To Person
Dog is facing person, looking in direction of the person. Proximity is not necessary
Accepting Food Rejecting Food Obeying Command
Dog ingests food when given or thrown by person Dog ignores food when given or thrown by person Dog complies with a command (i.e. sit, down, shake, get off, stop it, give, come here, etc.) Dog does not comply with command
Dog engages with playing person by play bowing, barking, light mouthing, jumping. No toy involved
Disobeying Command Lie In Proximity Dog is lying down within an arm’s reach (~1 m) Sit In Proximity Dog is sitting within an arm’s reach (~1 m) Mouthing Person Dog places teeth on person Annual Conference & Trade Show Jump On Person Dog places both front feet on person simultaneously and somewhat forcefully Dallas, TX
Some descriptive stats 35% of interactions ended in adoption 62% of dogs taken out only once People like different dogs/adopt dogs that they like right away 1 dog taken out SEVEN times! (Pretty but badly behaved?)
Average duration of interaction: 7.9 minutes (no difference in adoption/ non-adoption) Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
What predicts adoption?
Percent of dogs in each outcome category
Morphology? NO
40
Presumably, people already made their decision based on morphology during in-kennel 70 selection 70
35
60
60
30
50
50
25
40
40
20
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
15 10 5 0
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Not adopted Adopted
What predicts adoption? Location of interaction? YES BEST
Percent dogs in the outcome category
80 70 60 50 40
Not adopted
30
Adopted
20 10 0 Indoor room
Small outdoor
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Large outdoor
What predicts adoption? Percent of dogs in the outcome category
Intention to adopt a dog in general? YES 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Not adopted
Adopted
No intention
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Intention
What predicts adoption? Dog’s behavior? YES 5.0%
Ignoring Play Initiation
4.5% Percent time spent
4.0% 3.5%
8.0% 7.0% 6.0%
3.0%
5.0%
2.5%
4.0%
2.0%
3.0%
1.5%
1.0%
2.0%
0.5%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Annual Conference Show Not adopted& TradeAdopted Dallas, TX
Lying in Proximity
Not adopted
Adopted
Who were the potential adopters? Female (58%) Young (37% under 25 yrs) Lived with more than 2 other people (54%) Did not have children (54%) Already had other pets (58%)
No demographic category was more likely to adopt
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Survey results- Why did you choose to adopt this dog?
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Survey results- Why did you choose to NOT adopt this dog?
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Summary: How do people chose dogs at shelters? Out-of-kennel selection (8 min) Behavior: Lie down in proximity, don’t ignore play signals from adopter Location: smaller is better Mindset of adopter: needs to be willing to take the dog home today!
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
So how do we use this information? Train dogs on appropriate out-of-kennel behavior Lay down next to adopter Play with adopter
Arrange appropriate conditions Take adopter to smaller interaction area
HOWEVER…. Correlation ≠ Causation! Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
But what about out-of-kennel behavior? Target behavior Lie down next to potential adopter Don’t ignore play initiation by the adopter
EASY ENOUGH…
MY SOLUTION: Ask the dog what kind of play it prefers (individual preference assessment of play) Encourage the potential adopter to engage with the dog in preferred play style
Measure likelihood of adoption Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Validating Preference Assessment N = 20 Present toys consecutively in a random order If dog engages in oral contact with toy, the experimenter offers a treat to get the toy back The number of contacts for each toy is counted (proportion)
Tennis ball
Fleece rope
Squeaky vinyl toy
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Plush toy
Naturalistic observations Played with dog twice per week for 3 weeks Total of 6 observations
8 min observations Each toy for 1 min, twice If dog engages in oral contact with toy, the experimenter offers a treat to get the toy back The number of contacts for each toy is counted (proportion)
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Validating Preference Assessment
Proportion of trials played
Play in the assessment predicted play with that toy in naturalistic observations Examples:
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
BPA predicts play in general in naturalistic observations Proportion of All Play in the Brief Assessment
Pearson correlation of all play
1
R² = 0.8381 p < .05
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
0 0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Proportion of All Play in the Naturalistic Observations
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
BPA predicts play in general in naturalistic observations across time Proportion of play
1 0.8 0.6
0.4 0.2 0
1
2 Ball
3 4 Validity Test Squeky
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Rope
5 Plush
6
Brief Play Assessments Validity Assessment predicts play in general play with individual toys predicts no play
Play is stable across time
Reliability All assessments were videotaped and coded by an additional observer 95.4% IOA
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Structured Adopter-Dog Interactions 281 dogs enrolled
Experimental condition Play preference assessment Lying down assessment
Control condition
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Cost-efficient Play Preference Assessment Take dog out of the kennel Keep on leash Present toy 3 times while the dog is on the leash Order of toys not random
If dog takes the toy, give or toss a treat to the dog Play in at least 2/3 of the trials
First “winner” ends assessment
Tennis ball
Fleece rope
Squeaky vinyl toy
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Plush toy
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Experimental Assessment 160 potential adopter-dog interactions
Experimental condition Small interaction area Step 1: allow the dog to potty Step 2: play with preferred toy
Step 3: leash the dog and sit on bench Short leash next to adopter Reinforce laying down with treats
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Experimental Assessment 160 potential adopter-dog interactions
Control condition Off-leash in a large area containing various toys and agility equipment Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Questionnaire
Was interaction intrusive?
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Percentage of Time Engaging in Behavior
Structured Adopter-Dog Interactions 12%
*
10% 8% 6%
Condition:
*
Control
4% 2%
0%
Ignoring Play Independent Annual ConferenceInitiation & Trade ShowToy Play Dallas, TX
*
Lying in Proximity
Morphology did not predict adoption
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Structured Adopter-Dog Interactions χ2= 4.22, p = 0.03 Experimental
Control
23% 39% 61%
77% Adopted
Not Adopted
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Questionnaire 5 4
3 2 1 0 I was I was restricted Volunteer was I was I didn't get a full I was able to comfortable in interacting intrusive comfortable understanding evaluate the interacting with with dog with volunteer of the dog dog on my own dog terms
Control
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Experimental
Duration of interaction Does not take more time away from staff
14 12 Minutes
10 8 6 4 2 0 Control
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Experimental
Other interesting findings 281 dogs enrolled in study 38% wanted to play with toys 20% with tennis ball 7% with rope 3% with squeaky toy 8% with plush toy
16.5% were able to be lured into the down position
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Side note: How does play at the shelter compare to play at the house? Shelter: 38% of dogs enjoyed playing with toys Even if the dogs played, they only engaged in active play for a third of the available time Pet homes (Rooney et al., 2001)
Most common play signals Pat the floor (38%) Whisper vocalization (56%)
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Structured Adopter Dog Interaction Gives shelter dogs a voice Preference assessment of play
Improves behavior outside of the kennel Sociability/ calmness/attentiveness Increases social play with potential adopter Increases time spent laying down in proximity
Not perceived as intrusive Not more time-consuming for staff
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
What should you do? Know which toys individual dogs like Do they like playing in general?
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Sample Data Sheet • If 3/3, end • If 2/3 continue • Cheapest wins • If 1/3 highest • No toy preferred
Trial Ball
Ball Ball Rope Rope Rope
Squeaky Squeaky Squeaky Plush Plush Plush
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Success (Y/N)
What should you do? Toss treats into kennels Occasionally be boring to your dogs (read to them) Structure interactions with potential adopters Bring treats and leash Smaller enclosure area Bring preferred toy Encourage lying down
Take data! Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Summary: How do people chose dogs at shelters? In-kennel selection (20-70 sec) Morphology is important! Size, breed, and age matters Behavior: Front of kennel, facing front, no excessive locomotion No feces in kennel
Out-of-kennel selection (8 min) Behavior: Lie down in proximity, don’t ignore play signals from adopter Location: smaller is better Mindset of adopter: needs to be willing to take the dog home today! Putting it all together: assessing a multifaceted approach
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Human centered approach Kinds of questions: What do people want in dogs? How can we “sell” our product? Shelter versus pet store
Ensuring a quality product Return rates
Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX
Thank you! Funding Morris Animal Foundation, Merial, Maddie’s Shelter Medicine Program, Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association
Co-authors Hagar Hauser, Maria Brandifino, Amanda Gilmour, Jacqueline Shen, Rebecca Weis, Clive Wynne, Lindsay Mehrkam
Undergraduate research assistants Rachel Bradley, Caroline Leibrecht, Courtney Alexander, Kissel Goldman, Devin Caballero, Austin Folger, Jessica Vondran, Monica Perdomo, Nancy Ordax, Steph Junco, Sarah Weinsztok, Kaila Ames, Melinda Hua, Sandy Au Yeung, Jaclynn Key, Rebekah Pfaff, Daniel Snook, Amber Robinson, Claire Spieler, Melissa Campo, Leah Parker, Jiali Zhang, Kim Marrazzo, Jose Garcia, Yelena Gonzalez, Kreetee Dutta, Lucie Cavanagh, Dea Garic, Zachary Hoge, Taryn Lee, and Emma Grauerholz-Fisher
Photo credit: Beth Zavoyski, ACAS volunteers, Dory Rosati
[email protected] Annual Conference & Trade Show Dallas, TX