APPENDIX F
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
CANA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC CONSULTATION PLAN
February 9, 2010
Prepared by:
JLR 24057
Utilities Kingston Cana WWTP Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0
INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2
2.0
METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................................2
3.0
CONSULTATION OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................2
4.0
TARGET GROUPS .............................................................................................................3
5.0
KEY MESSAGE..................................................................................................................3
6.0
PUBLIC CONSULTATION METHODS AND ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE ................4
7.0
DETERMINATION OF SUCCESSFUL CONSULTATION.............................................8
8.0
CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................8
J. L. Richards & Associates Limited i
JLR 24057 February 9, 2010
Utilities Kingston Cana WWTP Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Plan
1.0
INTRODUCTION
Utilities Kingston, assisted by J.L. Richards & Associates Limited, is preparing for implementation of key upgrades to the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant (located on Cana Boulevard in the Cana subdivision, near Kingston Mills). The existing infrastructure is aging and is in need of repairs and/or upgrades to ensure continued reliable service. Utilities Kingston will officially announce a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) through a Notice of Commencement in February of 2010 in order to identify treatment requirements, assess alternative optimization strategies and ultimately, develop a recommended conceptual design. As part of the EA, this Public Consultation Plan has been developed to ensure that the community has opportunities to be involved in and comment on the EA. 2.0
METHODOLOGY
The creation of this Public Consultation Plan is based on knowledge of the Cana subdivision and of the Class EA process. This plan has been developed to ensure that the public is aware of the project and has the opportunity to comment at various phases of the study. 3.0
CONSULTATION OBJECTIVES
The following objectives have been developed in order to direct the efforts of those completing the EA.
Providing the general public with many opportunities to offer feedback to the engineering team on the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant EA
Ensuring the feedback provided by the public is reviewed and understood by the engineering team
Providing the general public with information on the need to improve the wastewater treatment plant and related infrastructure
Providing local residents close to the plant, especially those in the Cana subdivision with timely information about the EA process
Providing easy ways for local residents to obtain information about the EA process through the use of web sites, newsletters and project contact numbers for information
Encouraging participation at Public Information Centres (PICs) and consultation activities so that the engineering team understands local concerns and issues
J. L. Richards & Associates Limited 2
JLR 24057 February 9, 2010
Utilities Kingston Cana WWTP Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Plan
4.0
TARGET GROUPS
To satisfy the objectives of this Public Consultation Plan, target groups have been identified and are regarded as relatively distinct, although there are some acknowledge overlaps. The following list encompasses the audiences considered critical for the success of the Public Consultation Plan: The general public, including:
residents of Kingston
residents of the Cana Subdivision and immediate surroundings
Government representatives, including:
Local City Councillor
The Kingston Mayor and City Councillors
City Staff
Medical Officer of Health
Local MP/MPPs
The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
Ontario Ministry of Environment
Parks Canada
Utilities Kingston
Local and regional media, including:
5.0
The Kingston Whig-Standard
KEY MESSAGE
Consistent messages with the appropriate tone and content will improve understanding among target audiences and encourage support for the Cana WWTP EA. The message statements listed below are built on an understanding of the existing audiences, constraints and opportunities. These messages should be communicated throughout the study, and revised if necessary.
J. L. Richards & Associates Limited 3
JLR 24057 February 9, 2010
Utilities Kingston Cana WWTP Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Plan
Engineers are exploring strategies to improve and update the Cana WWTP to ensure continued reliable service for the future
Engineers are also exploring means of improving the existing sewer system within the Cana community in a cost-effective manner
The EA process will encourage community input to ensure the engineering team understands the concerns and expectations of the community
The EA process will look at measures to minimize the impacts of construction and expansion on local residents
The EA will look at measures to mitigate the impacts of the upgrade, including the construction phase
6.0
PUBLIC CONSULTATION METHODS AND ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE
A variety of public engagement vehicles and mechanisms are recommended to achieve the objectives of this plan. Care has been taken in selecting activities that recognize the needs of the local community, business and government organizations along with their specific information requirements. Establish a Public Liaison Committee (PLC) A Public Liaison Committee (PLC) is being established to ensure information is provided to residents or businesses in a timely, easily understood and efficient manner. The PLC should meet prior to each open house to provide feedback to the engineering team on consultation activities and study findings. The PLC should be established as soon as possible and prior to the first open house. Responsibilities of the PLC will include
Providing input on consultation activities to ensure that community information needs are met
Providing input on information to be presented at each open house and reviewing the consultation reports completed after each PLC and open house
Attending public open houses to provide a strong link between the engineering team and the residents or businesses of the area surrounding the Cana WWTP
Terms of Reference for PLC
J. L. Richards & Associates Limited 4
JLR 24057 February 9, 2010
Utilities Kingston Cana WWTP Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Plan
Time Commitments Members of the Public Liaison Committee will be expected to attend at least three meetings during the 7 month Study duration. PLC meetings are expected to last approximately two hours. PLC members are also encouraged to attend the two proposed Public Open Houses. Open Houses generally last at least two hours. Responsibilities Members will be expected to provide feedback on the consultation process, review and provide comments on the reports developed after each open house, and act as a steering committee for consultation activities. Qualifications Members should be credible, active participants in the local community and have a strong interest in the future of the City of Kingston. Where the representative is a member of a particular local organization, such as a community association, the representative should be chosen by the organization and be a member in good standing. PLC Size and Membership While Utilities Kingston welcomes all who are interested in the project, there is a need to ensure broad input and enable productive meetings. Members from the community will encompass four broad categories and, if necessary, be limited in numbers generally to
One or two representatives from the local community (business or residential)
One or two representatives from the Cana subdivision
One or two residents at large.
J. L. Richards & Associates Limited 5
JLR 24057 February 9, 2010
Utilities Kingston Cana WWTP Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Plan
Selection Where the number of interested participants is greater than the above stated targets, a review of applications will be completed, as found on the attached “Selection Criteria for PLC Members.” Those individuals who score the highest will be invited to participate on the PLC. All who express an interest will be provided opportunity at the Public Open House Meetings and through the feedback forms to provide valued input. If there are insufficient interested individuals from one broad category, Utilities Kingston may choose to offer an opportunity to other interested applicants. Two Open Houses (Public Information Centres (PIC)) Two PICs are recommended. PICs provide the best mechanism for the local community to be educated about the study and for the community to comment on the EA for the Cana WWTP. The PICs should be designed to be welcoming, providing opportunities for residents to speak directly with the engineering team and Utilities Kingston officials. Each of the two PICs should be organized to explain the study and its impact on local residents and businesses and present recommendations on how to proceed with the expansion. Residents will be encouraged to fill out comment sheets in order to provide feedback to the engineering team on the study and the information discussed at each PIC. On-going Promotion and Consultation In order to engage the public between the PICs, advertisements should be placed in local information pages of community and daily newspapers. The purpose of these advertisements will be to inform the public about the study and upcoming PICs. Web Site To assist the public in obtaining information about the study and to provide an on-going mechanism for feedback to the consulting team, Utilities Kingston should continue to provide space on their web site for the Cana WWTP EA.
J. L. Richards & Associates Limited 6
JLR 24057 February 9, 2010
Utilities Kingston Cana WWTP Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Plan
Information that should be displayed on the website includes: notices for open houses, frequently asked questions, minutes of meetings and other pertinent information. Feedback Mechanisms At all public meetings, residents should be encouraged to leave comments in a comment box following the meeting. At the beginning of the study phase, an e-mail and voice mail feedback mechanism should also be established to provide residents with numerous avenues to provide feedback. These access mechanisms should be promoted on all communications materials including advertisements, fact sheets and bulletins. Schedule The following schedule lists anticipated dates for key Public Consultation activities. These dates are subject to change as the study moves forward. Activity
Anticipated Date
Notice of Commencement
February 23, 2010
PLC Meeting No. 1
My 26, 2010
PIC 1
June 2, 2010
PLC Meeting No. 2
August 4, 2010
PIC NO. 2
August 11, 2010
PLC Meeting No. 3
September 8, 2010
Notice of Completion
September 15, 2010
J. L. Richards & Associates Limited 7
JLR 24057 February 9, 2010
Utilities Kingston Cana WWTP Environmental Assessment Public Consultation Plan
7.0
DETERMINATION OF SUCCESSFUL CONSULTATION
The following activities should be undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of the Public Consultation Plan on an ongoing basis.
8.0
Measure the interest in the PLC
Review the number of residents who attend the PICs
Examine the number and content of e-mails received from the public
CONCLUSION
Utilities Kingston is embarking on an important EA for the Cana WWTP. The activities contained in this Public Consultation Plan reflect the need to have an enhanced outreach program for local residents while at the same time implementing key consultation activities such as a PLC, PICs, and other means of providing information in a timely fashion. Local residents may not show a high interest in this study and this could potentially poses some challenges for the engineering team as work for the EA moves forward. Experience on other EA studies has shown that the greatest successes in community involvement are a result of an engaged and active local community. While it is impossible to make the public interested in this study, Utilities Kingston and J.L. Richards can still provide the information in a timely manner and answer questions from the public as they are posed. Ultimately, the creation of a PLC and close communication with the residents within in the Cana subdivision and in the surrounding area will ensure that those most affected by this work will be aware of the progress being made and will have the opportunity to voice their concerns.
J. L. Richards & Associates Limited 8
JLR 24057 February 9, 2010
Notice of Study Commencement
Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Utilities Kingston has initiated a Class Environmental Assessment (EA) to undertake a review of the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) to determine the nature of improvements to the facility. The Cana WWTP currently treats wastewater generated by the 32 homes in the Cana Subdivision, located near Kingston Mills, as shown in the map, below. The plant, constructed in the early 1970s, is an advanced oxidation plant that is nearing the end of its useful life. The facility requires repairs and/or upgrades to continue to provide reliable service for the community. The purpose of this study is to determine what form these upgrades will take, and will consider many factors including the natural environment, social, economic, and cultural conditions, to ensure that the upgraded plant meets the needs of the community both local and at large. The study is being conducted in accordance with the requirements of a Schedule C project under the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (October 2000, as amended in 2007). The Class EA process involves assessment of alternative strategies for process upgrades, development of a recommended conceptual design, and consultation with agencies and the public. The alternative strategies will be evaluated to ensure the preferred solution minimizes impacts on the natural and social/cultural environment, while optimizing capital and operating investments.
Public and agency consultation is a key element of the Class EA process, and input will be sought during the study. A mailing list for notification of project status and opportunities for public input is now being compiled. If you have any questions regarding the study, please go to the project website at http://www.utilitieskingston.com/Water/CanaWWTP/index.aspx?wwopenpane=3 or contact one of the people listed below. Michael Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 863 Princess Street, Suite 203 Kingston ON K7L 5N4
[email protected] Phone: 613.544.1424 ext. 231 Fax: 613.544.5679
Mike Fischer, P.Eng. Utilities Engineer Utilities Kingston 1211 John Counter Boulevard Kingston, ON K7L 4X7
[email protected] Phone: 613.546.1181 ext. 2356 Fax: 613.542.1463
This Notice issued February 23, 2010
February 23, 2010 Our File No. 24057
Dear Owner: Subject:
Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment
J.L. Richards & Associates Limited is working with Utilities Kingston to improve the Cana WWTP. The plant is in poor condition and is in need of repairs and upgrades to ensure it continues to provide effective treatment of wastewater generated in the Cana community. The first phase of the project is an Environmental Assessment to determine how best to upgrade the plant and balance the various environmental, social, economic and other factors influencing the nature of plant upgrades. Site-specific investigations will be underway in the coming weeks and months to identify potential impacts and appropriate mitigation measures in order to complete the study and consultation requirements. This study is currently being conducted in accordance with the requirements for Schedule C projects as described in the Municipal Engineers Association’s Class EA document (2000, as amended in 2007). Consultation with the public and government review agencies is an important and necessary component of all EA studies. Attached is the Notice of Commencement for the study. For questions or comments, or if you no longer wish to be notified of this study, please contact the undersigned via email at
[email protected], at the above address, or by telephone at (613) 544-1424, ext. 231. Yours very truly, J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Michael S. Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer cc:
Mike Fischer, P.Eng, Utilities Kingston
Enclosure
Cana WWTP EA Agency Address List
Agency Algonquin and Lakeshore District School Board
Name Mr. Doug Campbell
Catholic School Board Algonquin District Mr. Doug Campbell
Bell Canada Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Mr. F.H. Berry
Ms. Louise Knox
Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Mr. Rob McRae Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Ms. Mara Shaw
City of Kingston
Ms. Cherie Mills
Conseil des écoles catholiques du CentreEst de l'Ontario Conseil des écoles publiques de l'Est de l'Ontario Correctional Service Canada
Conseil des écoles catholiques du Centre-Est de l'Ontario
CN Rail Department of Indian
Mr. Roch Landriault Ms. Nancy Stableforth
Mr. John MacTaggart Mr. Glenn Gilbert
Title
Address1 Address2 Postal_Code
Salutation
Controller of Plant and 151 Dairy Planning Services Ave
Napanee, ON
K7R 4B2
Mr. Campbell
Controller of Plant and 151 Dairy Planning Services Ave 449 Princess Implemention Mgr. Street, Floor Access Network 6, P.O. Box Facilities 3000 55 St. Clair Avenue East, Room 907 1641 Perth Road, P.O. Box 160 1641 Perth Road, P.O. Box 160 Manager, Policy Planning Planning & Development 216 Ontario Department Street
Napanee, ON
K7R 4B2
Mr. Campbell
Kingston, ON
K7L 4Z9
Mr. Berry
Toronto, ON
M4T 1M2
Ms. Knox
Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0
Mr. McRae
Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0
Ms. Shaw
Kingston, ON
K7L 2Z3
4000, rue Gloucester, K1J 1A1 Labelle Ontario 2445 Boulevard St- Ottawa, Laurent Ontario K1G 6C3 440 King St. Kingston, Deputy Commissioner W. Ontario K7L 4Y8 1 Administratio n Road PO Concord, ON Box 1000 L4K 1B9 Manager 25 St. Clair Toronto, M4T 1M2
Ms. Mills Conseil des écoles catholiques du Centre-Est de l'Ontario
Mr. LaRoque Ms. Stableforth
Mr. MacTaggart Mr. Gilbert
Cana WWTP EA Agency Address List and Northern Affairs
Department of Indian and Northern Affairs Ducks Unlimited Enbridge Consumers Gas
Environment Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Health Canada
Health Canada Hydro One
Ave East, 8th ON Floor 25 St. Clair Ave East, 5th Toronto, ON Mr. Shawn Green Environmental Officer Floor 1-614 Norris Kingston, Mr. Scott Muir Ct. Ontario 400 Coventry Ottawa, Mr. Mike Johnson Road ON P.O. Box 5050 867 Burlington, Lakeshore Mr. Rob Dobos Head EA Section Road ON 401 King St W, P.O. Box Prescott, ON Ms. Debbie Miller Referrals Coordinator 1000 200 Eglantine Driveway Ms. Diane McClymontDirector Environmental Tunney’s Ottawa, Peace Health Assessement Pasture ON 200 Eglantine Driveway Environmental Health Tunney’s Ottawa, Ms. Anik Guertin Assessment Officer Pasture ON 913 Crawford Peterborou Mr. Gary Panter/Bill Lowry Drive gh, ON
Kingston Environmental Kingston Environmental Advisory Committee Advisory Committee Kingston Field Kingston Field Naturalists Naturalists
Kingston Fire & Rescue Inspector Rob Kidd Kingston, Frontenac Dr. Ian Gemmill and Lennox &
216 Ontario C/O Clerk's Department Street
Kingston ON Kingston, PO. Box 831 ON 905 Kingston, Woodbine Fire Prevention Officer Road Ontario Medical Officer of 221 Kingston, Health Portsmouth ON
M4T 1M2
Mr. Green
K7P 2R9
Mr. Muir
K1K 2C7
Mr. Johnson
L7R 4A6
Mr. Dobos
K0E 1T0
Ms. Miller
K1A 0K9
Ms. McClymontPeace
K1A 0K9
K7L 4X6
Ms. Guertin Mr. Panter/ Lowry Kingston Environmental Advisory Committee Kingston Field Naturalists
K7P 2X4
Inspector Kidd
K7M 1V5
Dr. Gemmill
K9J 3X1
K7L 2Z3
Cana WWTP EA Agency Address List Addington Health Unit Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Health Unit
K7M 1V5
Mr. Mitchell
Kngston, ON
K7L 4X4
Mr. Clements
Chair
930 Old Front Road
Kingston, ON
K7M 4M1
Ms. Cannon
Mr. A. Gordon Mitchell
Limestone District School Board Mr. Wayne Toms Little Cataraqui Creek Environment Association Ms. Christine J. Cannon Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Mr. Nick Prestinaci Services
Ministry of Culture
Mr. Chris Anderson
Ministry of Energy
Mr. Alan Jenkins
Ministry of Energy
Mr. Kevin Pal
Ministry of Transportation
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care
Kingston, ON
Manager of Information, Technology, Planning
Avenue 221 Portsmouth Avenue 220 Portsmouth Ave, Postal Bag 610
Mr. Fred Ruf
Ministry of Infrastructure Renewal Ms. Tija Dirks
Manager of Strategic Planning
25 Grosvenor Toronto, St. 13th Floor ON M7A 2Y6 400 University Heritage Ave. 4th Toronto, Planner/Archeologist Floor ON M7A 2R9 880 Bay Toronto, Street 3rd Senior Policy Adviser Floor ON M7A 2C1 880 Bay Toronto, Street 6th Manager Floor ON M7A 2C1 2nd Floor South St. Environmental Policy 301 St. Paul Catharines, and Standards Section Street ON L2R 7R4 Acting Head of Food and Safety, Safe Water and Environmental 5700 Yonge Health and Toxicology Street 8th Toronto, Unit Floor M2M 4K5 ON Ontario Growth Secritariat 777 Bay Street 16th Toronto, ON Director Growth Policy Floor M5G 2E5
Mr. Prestinaci
Mr. Anderson
Mr. Jenkins
Mr. Pal
To Whom it May Concern
Mr. Ruf
Ms. Dirks
Cana WWTP EA Agency Address List Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing Ministry of Natural Resources
Mr. Michael Elms
Municipal Planning Adviser
Ms. Monique Charet
Ministry of Tourism and Recreation Ms. Mary Beach
Environmental Assessment Coordinator Manager Ministry of Tourism and Recreation
Parks Canada
Valalrie Blazeski
Ecosystem Scientist
Trans-Northern Pipelines
Mr. Gary Robinson
Manager
Ministry of the Environment
Ms. Vicki Mitchell
Transport Canada Ms. Haya Finan Triboard Student Transportation Services Mr. Steve Wowk
Environmental Officer Manager of Transportation
8 Estate Lane, Rockwood Kingston, Ontario House 51 Heakes Kingston, Lane ON Box 22032, 1259 Gardiners Kingston, Road ON 347 Preston Street, 4th Ottawa ON Floor 34A Beckwith Smiths Street South Falls, ON 45 Vogell Road, Suite Richmond 310 Hill, ON 4900 Yonge Street, Suite Toronto, ON 300 81 Dairy Napanee, Avenue ON
K7M 9A8
Mr. Elms
K7M 9B1
Ms. Charet
K7M 8S5
Ms. Mitchell
K1S 3J4
Ms. Beach
K7A 2A8
Ms. Blazeski
L4B 3P6
Mr. Robinson
M2N 6A5
Ms. Finan
K7R 1M5
Mr. Wowk
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE CANA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SCHEDULE C CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UTILITIES KINGSTON Study Background: Utilities Kingston has initiated a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) to evaluate options for the management (i.e. collection, conveyance, and treatment) of sewage from the 32-home Cana community. The location of the existing plant is shown in the figure below. The study is being conducted according to the Municipal Class EA process, and is currently considered a Schedule C undertaking. The treatment capacity of the plant is not being increased as part of this project. The EA has been implemented to address the infrastructure in the Cana community, since the existing facility and collection system are aging and in need of repair. The existing sewage collection system has been in operation for approximately 50 years and preliminary investigations have revealed that improvements are required. The Cana WWTP was commissioned in 1973 and has not been substantially improved since that time. Given that effluent quality requirements have become increasingly stringent and that the existing plant is in need of repair, this Class EA will seek to provide recommendations for what form improvements to the system should take. Study Process: The EA is proceeding as a Schedule C undertaking in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario Municipal Class EA. It will involve an assessment of the potential positive or negative social, cultural, economic, and environmental impacts of a number of options Public Consultation: Public and agency consultation is a key element throughout the Class EA process. You are invited to review information about the study, learn more about the Class EA process, provide your feedback, and meet the project team at the following Public Information Centre: Date: Thursday June 10, 2010 Time: 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Place: Meadowcrest Community Centre 360 Kingston Mills Road, Kingston, ON For more information on this Class EA or to have your name added to our mailing list for receiving updates on the Class EA and future opportunities for public input please contact: Michael Troop, P.Eng. Project Manager J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 863 Princess Street, Suite 203 Kingston ON K7L 5N4 Phone: 613.544.1424 Ext. 231
Mike Fischer, P.Eng. Utilities Engineer Utilities Kingston 1211 John Counter Boulevard Kingston, ON K7L 4X7 Phone: 613.546.1181, Ext.2356
Project Contact Email:
[email protected] This Notice issued on June 1, 2010.
May 28, 2010 Our File No. 24057
Dear Owner: Subject:
Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment
J.L. Richards & Associates Limited is working with Utilities Kingston to improve the Cana WWTP. Because the Cana WWTP effluent is discharged to a creek that flows into Colonel By Lake, we are sending this letter to area residents, agencies, and others to ensure that those who could be impacted or might be interested are made aware of the study. The plant is in poor condition and is in need of repairs and upgrades to ensure it continues to provide effective treatment of wastewater generated in the Cana community. The first phase of the project is an Environmental Assessment to determine how best to upgrade the plant and balance the various environmental, social, economic and other factors influencing the nature of plant upgrades. Site-specific investigations are underway to identify potential impacts and appropriate mitigation measures in order to complete the study and consultation requirements. This study being conducted in accordance with the requirements for Schedule C projects as described in the Municipal Engineers Association’s Class EA document (2000, as amended in 2007). Consultation with the public and government review agencies is an important and necessary component of all EA studies. Attached is the Notice of a Public Information Centre to be held in the near future. For questions or comments, or if you no longer wish to be notified of this study, please contact the undersigned via email at
[email protected], at the above address, or by telephone at (613) 544-1424, ext. 231. Yours very truly, J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Michael S. Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer cc:
Mike Fischer, P.Eng, Utilities Kingston
Enclosure
Public Liaison Committee Meeting No. 1 June 3, 2010 Utilities Kingston Meeting Room 3:00 to 4:00 pm Agenda • Introductions • Overview of Project • Phase 1 – Environmental Assessment • Phase 2 – Detailed Design • Phase 3 – Construction Implementation • Brief Summary of Class EA Process • Project Status • Meetings with Agencies • Technical Memoranda • Role of the Public Liaison Committee (PLC) • Contact with the general public • Provide comments to the engineering team • Refer community concerns to the engineering team • Go-to contacts • Information Package and Folders • Area map • Class EA process • Notices • Other information as the project proceeds • Public Information Centre Discussion • General Discussion • Adjournment
Welcome to the
Public Information Centre for the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant - Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment -
June 10, 2010
Background •
Utilities Kingston has initiated a Class Environmental Assessment to address the aging infrastructure.
•
The study is following a Schedule C Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process to ensure that decisions reflect the needs of stakeholders and that any environmental concerns are addressed or mitigated.
•
The Problem Statement is as follows: “The Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant and the associated collection system are aging and are in need of repairs and/or upgrades. An upgraded facility could also enable a higher level of treatment to ensure effluent meets current environmental legislation and best practices. Utilities Kingston has initiated a Class Environmental Assessment to determine the best course of action to improve the wastewater system in the Cana community.”
•
This project does not involve an increase in plant capacity or extension of service area.
•
Initial discussion with key agencies such as the Ministry of the Environment, Parks Canada, and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority have occurred
Area Map
Class EA Process (Schedule C)
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process Flow Chart PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 5
Problem or Opportunity
Alternative Solutions
Alternative Design Concepts for Preferred Solution
Environmental Study Report
Implementation
Identify problem or opportunities
Identify alternative solutions to problem or opportunity
Identify alternative design concepts for preferred solution
Complete Environmental Study Report
Complete contract drawings and tender documents
Select Schedule
Detail inventory of natural, social, economic environment
Discretionary public consultation to review problem or opportunity
Inventory natural, social, & economic environment
Identify impacts of alternative solutions on environment & mitigating measures
We are here
Evaluate alternative solutions: identify recommended solutions
Consult review agencies & public
Identify impact of alternative designs on environment & mitigating measures
Evaluate alternative designs: identify recommended design
Consult review agencies & previously interested & directly affected public
Select preferred design
Select preferred solution
Review environmental significance & choice of schedule
Review and confirm choice of schedule
Preliminary finalization of preferred design
Environmental Study Report placed on public record Notice of completion to review agencies and public Copy of notice of completion to MOE-EA branch
Opportunity to request Minister within 30 days of notification to request an order
Proceed to construction and operation
Monitor for environmental provisions and commitments
Existing Cana WWTP The following are characteristics of the existing Cana WWTP: •Constructed and commissioned in 1973 •Originally owned & operated by MOE, transfer to Pittsburgh Twp in early 1990’s, then to City of Kingston during amalgamation •Designed to treat 95 m3/day (25 000 US Gal/day) •Consists of: •Pumping System •Coarse Screen •Aeration Tank •Clarifier •Chlorine Contact Tank •Outfall •Sampler •Backup Generator •Electrical Power, Communications, and Controls
•Serves the 32-home Cana community •Discharges treated effluent to a creek which in turn discharges to Colonel By Lake
Schematic Representation of the Existing Facility
Structure of the Study This study will be facilitated through a number of separate studies including: •
• • •
• • • •
• • • •
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Assimilative Capacity Assessment • Establishes acceptable effluent characteristics for an upgraded plant Technical Memorandum No. 2 – Collection System Study • A study to determine required improvements to the Cana sewage collection system (investigations are underway) Technical Memorandum No. 3 – Review of Alternative Solutions • Will establish the preferred alternative solution Technical Memorandum No. 4 – Review of Alternative Designs • Will provide a recommendation regarding the preferred design alternative Archaeological Assessment • Will ensure that archaeological concerns are addressed through the study Ecological Assessment • Will ensure that ecological concerns are addressed through the study Geotechnical Studies • Will be undertaken if required. Environmental Study Report (ESR) • Will summarize the findings of other studies – this will be the final deliverable for the Environmental Assessment Public and Agency Consultation will consist of the following: Mailings Notices in the Newspaper Public Liaison Committee (has already been established) Public Information Centres
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Alternative Solutions
1. Do Nothing • Will not address the Problem Statement • Defers improvements that will be required eventually 2. Repair/Upgrade the Existing Plant • Existing plant is in repairable physical condition • Simple repairs will not improve effluent quality • Relocation of outfall may be required 3. Replace Existing Plant Using A Similar or Different Treatment Technology • There have been many technological improvements since the plant was built in 1973, using a different technology could provide a better fit for the specific needs at Cana • Could incorporate ‘green’ technology • Relocation of outfall may be required 4. Subsurface Discharge System • Original wastewater treatment system at Cana utilized a septic tank and tile bed (subsurface discharge) • Would require the acquisition of additional land offsite for tile bed 5. Evaporative Discharge System • Has not been proved at the scale of Cana WWTP • Would require a large amount of land 6. Replace Existing Plant with Pumping Station – Pump Sewage to Another Collection System • Would remove requirement to discharge to area waterways • Need to run a forcemain either 3 700 m or 4 900 m to connect with existing system and cross the 401 and either the CN railway or the Rideau Canal 7. Replace Existing Plant with Storage Tank and Haul Sewage to Another Plant • Would require about 3 to 4 tanker trucks per day • The Ministry of the Environment would not likely approve this type of system Currently, the tentative recommended alternative is a combination of No. 2 and 3 – implementing a new plant while utilizing as much of the existing infrastructure as is reasonable. The treatment technology for an upgraded plant would be determined further on in the study. The degree to which the existing plant could be incorporated into the new facility would be determined once the technology has been selected.
Schedule C Class EA - Next Steps -
•
Consider comments from this Public Information Centre and from agencies
•
Finalize Technical Memorandum No. 3 (Preferred Alternative Solution)
•
Prepare for the next Public Information Centre to discuss the preferred design concept (Technical Memorandum No. 4)
•
Undertake Ecological, Archaeological, and Geotechnical investigations, as required.
•
Ultimately, complete the Class EA process 30 Day and proceed to implementation based on Public Review recommendations from the Class EA
Annotated Aerial Photograph
Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Comment Sheet Utilities Kingston is interested in receiving the community’s comments, questions, and concerns regarding the proposed alternatives for potential improvements to the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and collection system. Please take a few minutes to fill out this brief comment sheet. All comments will be carefully considered while completing the Class Environmental Assessment study. 1. This study is following the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process for a Schedule C project. Do you have any questions, comments, or concerns about the decision-making processes that are being followed? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. The need for the upgrades at the Cana WWTP is based on the current condition of the facility. Do you have any questions, comments, or concerns about the need to upgrade or renew this system? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. The preferred alternative has been presented in preliminary form. Do you have any comments or questions on the nature of the recommended alternative? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 4. There are several final steps to be taken in order to finalize the Provincial component of the Environmental Assessment. Do you have any comments or questions regarding how this study will be completed? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
1
5. Do you have any additional comments? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments. Comment sheets may be returned to any of the presenters, or can be mailed, emailed, or faxed to the following: Michael Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 863 Princess Street, Suite 203 Kingston ON K7L 5N4 Phone: 613.544.1424 Ext. 231
Mike Fischer, P.Eng. Utilities Engineer Utilities Kingston 1211 John Counter Boulevard Kingston, ON K7L 4X7 Phone: 613.546.1181, Ext.2356
Project Contact Email:
[email protected]
2
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE (OPEN HOUSE) CANA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SCHEDULE C CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UTILITIES KINGSTON Study Background: Utilities Kingston is undertaking a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) to evaluate options for the management (i.e. collection, conveyance, and treatment) of sewage from the 32-home Cana community. The location of the existing plant is shown in the figure below. The study is being conducted according to the Municipal Class EA process, and is currently considered a Schedule C undertaking. The treatment capacity of the plant is not being increased as part of this project. The EA has been implemented to address the infrastructure in the Cana community, since the existing facility and collection system are aging and in need of repair. The existing sewage collection system has been in operation for approximately 50 years and preliminary investigations have revealed that improvements are required. The Cana WWTP was commissioned in 1973 and has not been substantially improved since that time. Given that effluent quality requirements have become increasingly stringent and that the existing plant is in need of repair, this Class EA will seek to provide recommendations for what form improvements to the system should take. Study Process: The EA is proceeding as a Schedule C undertaking in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario Municipal Class EA. It will involve an assessment of the potential positive or negative social, cultural, economic, and environmental impacts of a number of options Public Consultation: Public and agency consultation is a key element throughout the Class EA process. You are invited to attend an Open House to review information about the study, learn more about the Class EA process, provide your feedback, and meet the project team. Please drop in any time during the Open House to learn more about the project. Date: Tuesday August 31, 2010 Time: 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM Place: Meadowcrest Community Centre 360 Kingston Mills Road, Kingston, ON For more information on this Class EA or to have your name added to our mailing list for receiving updates on the Class EA and future opportunities for public input please contact: Michael Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 863 Princess Street, Suite 203 Kingston ON K7L 5N4 Phone: 613.544.1424 Ext. 231
Mike Fischer, P.Eng. Utilities Engineer Utilities Kingston 85 Lappan’s Lane Kingston, ON K7L 4X7 Phone: 613.546.1181, Ext.2356
Project Contact Email:
[email protected] This Notice issued on August 24, 2010.
Welcome to the
Public Information Centre for the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant - Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment -
August 31, 2010
Background •
Utilities Kingston has initiated a Class Environmental Assessment to address the aging infrastructure.
•
The study is following a Schedule C Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process to ensure that decisions reflect the needs of stakeholders and that any environmental concerns are addressed or mitigated.
•
The Problem Statement is as follows: “The Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant and the associated collection system are aging and are in need of repairs and/or upgrades. An upgraded facility could also enable a higher level of treatment to ensure effluent meets current environmental legislation and best practices. Utilities Kingston has initiated a Class Environmental Assessment to determine the best course of action to improve the wastewater system in the Cana community.”
•
This project does not involve an increase in plant capacity or extension of service area.
Area Map
Class EA Process (Schedule C)
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process Flow Chart
We are here
Courtesy of the Municipal Engineers Association Exhibit A.2 – Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, October 2000, as amended in 2007
Existing Cana WWTP Characteristics of the existing Cana WWTP: •Constructed and commissioned in 1973 •Originally owned & operated by MOE, transferred to Pittsburgh Twp in early 1990’s, then to City of Kingston during amalgamation •Designed to treat 95 m3/day (25 000 US Gal/day) •Consists of: •Pumping System •Coarse Screen •Aeration Tank •Clarifier •Chlorine Contact Tank •Outfall •Sampler •Electrical Power, Communications, and Controls
•Serves the 32-home Cana community •Discharges treated effluent to a creek which in turn discharges to Colonel By Lake
Schematic Representation of the Existing Facility
Structure of the Study This study will be facilitated through a number of separate studies including: •
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Assimilative Capacity Assessment •Establishes acceptable effluent characteristics for an upgraded plant
•
Technical Memorandum No. 2 – Collection System Study •A study to determine required improvements to the Cana sewage collection system (investigations are underway)
•
Technical Memorandum No. 3 – Review of Alternative Solutions •Establishes the preferred alternative solution
•
Technical Memorandum No. 4 – Review of Alternative Designs •Provides a recommendation regarding the preferred design alternative
•
Archaeological Assessment •Will ensure that archaeological concerns are addressed through the study
•
Ecological Assessment •Will ensure that ecological concerns are addressed through the study
•
Geotechnical Studies •Will be undertaken if required.
•
Environmental Study Report (ESR) •Will summarize the findings of other studies – this will be the final deliverable for the Environmental Assessment Task Status Complete In Progress Pending
• • • •
Public and Agency Consultation will consist of the following: Mailings Notices in the Newspaper Public Liaison Committee (has already been established) Public Information Centres (Open Houses)
Various Studies • Ecological Assessment Field investigations and report completed – recommendations: -No ecological value except for the stream -Maintain effluent discharge in creek to maintain wetland there -Use best management practices to mitigate any work in the stream • Archaeological Study Field investigations and report completed – no elements of archaeological value noted. • Geotechnical Study None envisioned at this time. • Collection System Study (Ongoing) Sewer main and manhole rehabilitation is underway. Lateral inspections are ongoing.
Summary of Alternative Selection Alternatives: Do Nothing Repair the Existing Facility Replace the Existing Facility Replace with Pumping Station and Forcemain Replace with Storage Tank and Haulage Implement Subsurface Discharge Implement Evaporative Discharge
Criteria: Public Health Natural Environment Cost Feasibility of Design Operation and Maintenance Historical Significance Social Impact
Preferred Alternative: Replace the existing facility with a new one. Efforts will be made to salvage as much of the existing facility as possible to reduce costs. Choice of treatment technology is discussed further below
Selection of Appropriate Treatment Technology The following treatment technologies are included in the investigation: • • • • • • • • • •
Living Machine/Constructed Wetland Biofilter Septic Systems Conventional Activated Sludge Extended Aeration Biological Aerated Filter Membrane Bioreactor Sequencing Batch Reactor Rotating Biological Contactors Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor
Level of Treatment Required An improved Cana WWTP will be required to provide a higher level of treatment as compared to the current plant. Key effluent parameters are compared for the current facility and the maximum allowable concentrations in an upgraded facility Existing Cana WWTP Effluent Concentrations Future Maximum Allowable Concentration for Discharge to Colonel By Lake Future Maximum Allowable Concentration for Discharge to Creek 1.4
25
25
0.8 14.3 10
10 0.3
6.6
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD5) (mg/L)
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (mg/L)
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS (mg/L)
24244 6.7 6.0 1.
4.0
3.0
200
200
3.1
2.0
0.02
0.02
TOTAL RESIDUAL CHLORINE (mg/L)
TOTAL AMMONIDA NITROGEN (WINTER) (mg/L)
TOTAL AMMONIDA NITROGEN (SUMMER) (mg/L)
E. coli (counts/100 mL) (Logarithmic Scale)
Preferred Design The Preferred Design is as follows: Biological System Effluent discharge to either the Creek or Colonel By Lake Reuse of as much of the existing facility as possible. Recommended effluent objectives and limits for an upgraded/new Cana WWTP:
Table extracted from Technical Memorandum No. 1
Schedule C Class EA - Next Steps -
•
Consider comments from this Public Information Centre and from agencies
•
Finalize Technical Memorandum No. 4 (Preferred Alternative Solution)
•
Complete the Environmental Study Report (ESR) and post for the 30-day review period.
•
Ultimately, complete the Class EA process and proceed to implementation based on recommendations from the Class EA 30 Day Public Review
Annotated Aerial Photograph
August 19, 2010 Our File No. 24057
Dear Owner: Subject:
Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment
J.L. Richards & Associates Limited is working with Utilities Kingston to improve the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Because the Cana WWTP effluent is discharged to a creek that flows into Colonel By Lake, we are sending this letter to area residents, agencies, and others to ensure that those who could be impacted or might be interested are made aware of the study. The plant is in poor condition and is in need of repairs and upgrades to ensure it continues to provide effective treatment of wastewater generated in the Cana community. The first phase of the project is an Environmental Assessment to determine how best to upgrade the plant and balance the various environmental, social, economic, and other factors influencing the nature of plant upgrades. Site-specific investigations are underway to identify potential impacts and appropriate mitigation measures in order to complete the study and consultation requirements. This study is being conducted in accordance with the requirements for Schedule C projects as described in the Municipal Engineers Association’s Class EA document (2000, as amended in 2007). Consultation with the public and government review agencies is an important and necessary component of all EA studies. Attached is the Notice of a Public Information Centre, which is an Open House to be held in the near future. For questions or comments, or if you no longer wish to be notified of this study, please contact the undersigned via email at
[email protected], at the above address, or by telephone at (613) 544-1424, Ext. 231. Yours very truly, J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Michael S. Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer MST:lb cc: Mike Fischer, P.Eng, Utilities Kingston Enclosure
Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Comment Sheet Utilities Kingston is interested in receiving the community’s comments, questions, and concerns regarding the proposed alternatives for potential improvements to the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and collection system. Please take a few minutes to fill out this brief comment sheet. All comments will be carefully considered while completing the Class Environmental Assessment study. 1. This study is following the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process for a Schedule C project. Do you have any questions, comments, or concerns about the decision-making processes that are being followed? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. The need for the upgrades at the Cana WWTP is based on the current condition of the facility. Do you have any questions, comments, or concerns about the need to upgrade or renew this system? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. The preferred alternative has been presented in preliminary form. Do you have any comments or questions on the nature of the recommended alternative? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 4. There are several final steps to be taken in order to finalize the Provincial component of the Environmental Assessment. Do you have any comments or questions regarding how this study will be completed? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
1
5. Do you have any additional comments? ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments. Comment sheets may be returned to any of the presenters, or can be mailed, emailed, or faxed to the following: Michael Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 863 Princess Street, Suite 203 Kingston ON K7L 5N4 Phone: 613.544.1424 Ext. 231
Mike Fischer, P.Eng. Utilities Engineer Utilities Kingston 1211 John Counter Boulevard Kingston, ON K7L 4X7 Phone: 613.546.1181, Ext.2356
Project Contact Email:
[email protected]
2
PUBLIC LIAISON COMMITTEE (PLC) MEMBERS WANTED Environmental Assessment (EA) for Upgrades to the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant
A Public Liaison Committee (PLC) is being established for this study to:
Provide input on consultation activities to ensure that community information needs are met; Provide input on information to be presented at each open house and other consultation activities and review the consultation reports completed after each PLC and open house; and, Attend public open houses to provide a strong link between the project team and the residents of the City of Kingston.
Utilities Kingston is seeking two to four members to sit on the PLC. Members of the Public Liaison Committee will be expected to attend the public open houses. PLC members are also expected to attend approximately three PLC meetings during the EA, scheduled to be completed over the next year. Applications will be received throughout the study. Positions on the PLC will generally be allocated based on receipt of applications. However, should more than the required number of applications be received, we reserve the right to select those most qualified to serve on the PLC. Selection of PLC members will consider proximity to the site, knowledge of the neighbourhood, past EA and/or wastewater experience. For more information or to obtain an application form, please visit the project website at http://www.utilitieskingston.com/water/CanaWWTP/index.html. Application forms are also available at 211 John Counter Boulevard or via phone or email, as follows: Michael Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 863 Princess Street, Suite 203 Kingston ON K7L 5N4
[email protected] Phone: 613.544.1424 Ext. 231 Fax: 613.544.5679
Mike Fischer, P.Eng. Utilities Engineer Utilities Kingston 1211 John Counter Boulevard Kingston, ON K7L 4X7
[email protected] Phone: 613.546.1181 ext. 2356 Fax: 613.542.1463
Signed applications will be received until 4:00 p.m., March 15, 2010.
PUBLIC LIAISON COMMITTEE (PLC) CANA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Application Form Note: An original signed copy of this application form must be received at J.L. Richards Kingston Office (863 Princess Street, Suite 203) by 4:00 p.m., March 15, 2010, to be considered. Address envelope to the Michael Troop, P. Eng. Name:
Mr.
Ms.
Mrs.
Phone: Address:
Fax: E-mail
I live at: I have lived in this community for _____ years. I am currently a member of the following community, environmental, or business organizations (note positions held on executive and committees):
I have participated in designing, managing, or delivering the following local initiatives:
I am interested in participating in the Public Liaison Committee for this project because:
I have read the Draft Terms of Reference for the Public Liaison Committee. I understand the roles and responsibilities of PLC members. I am committed to fulfill those duties if appointed to the Committee. I will be available over the next 7 months to participate in PLC activities. I understand that this is a voluntary position and that I will not be remunerated. Signature
Date
Attach additional information if required.
PUBLIC LIAISON COMMITTEE (PLC) CANA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Selection Criteria for PLC Members Utilities Kingston and the project engineering team will review applications received. The "yes" column will be rated on a scale of 1 to 3, where 1 indicates a minimal score and 3 the maximum score. The candidates with the highest totals will be offered the positions. If one or more do not accept, those with the next best scores will be invited to participate, until all positions are filled. CRITERION 1.
NO
Candidate exhibits: a) Familiarity with study area b) Knowledge of the issue c) Experience with similar studies d) Experience with program/project planning f)
Commitment to community matters
g) Commitment to participate h) Knowledge of related technical issues 2.
Candidate lives in a community near the site.
3.
Candidate is a member of one or more groups invited to sit on the Committee (Subtract points). A signed original of the application form is on file with Utilities Kingston (Assign 1 point if yes). The application met the deadline of 4:00 p.m., March 15, 2010)
4. 5.
(Assign 1 point if yes).
6.
The applicant has potentially significant time constraints (Subtract points).
TOTAL Evaluator Comments:
Evaluated by:
Date:
YES
PUBLIC LIAISON COMMITTEE (PLC) CANA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Terms of Reference February 18, 2010 A Public Liaison Committee (PLC) is being established to ensure information is provided to residents or businesses in a timely, easily understood and efficient manner. The PLC should meet prior to each open house to provide feedback to the engineering team on consultation activities and study findings. The PLC should be established as soon as possible and prior to the first open house. Responsibilities of the PLC will include
Providing input on consultation activities to ensure that community information needs are met;
Providing input on information to be presented at each open house and reviewing the consultation reports completed after each PLC and open house; and
Attending public open houses to provide a strong link between the engineering team and the residents or businesses of the area surrounding the Cana WWTP.
Terms of Reference for PLC Time Commitments:
Members of the Public Liaison Committee will be expected to attend at least three meetings during the 7 month Study duration. PLC meetings are expected to last approximately two hours. PLC members are also encouraged to attend the two proposed Public Open Houses. Open Houses generally last at least two hours.
Responsibilities:
Members will be expected to provide feedback on the consultation process, review and provide comments on the reports developed after each open house, and act as a steering committee for consultation activities.
Qualifications:
Members should be credible, active participants in the local community and have a strong interest in the future of the City of Kingston.
Where the representative is a member of a particular local organization, such as a community association, the representative should be chosen by the organization and be a member in good standing.
-1-
PUBLIC LIAISON COMMITTEE (PLC) CANA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Terms of Reference February 18, 2010
PLC Size and Membership While Utilities Kingston welcomes all who are interested in the project, there is a need to ensure broad input and enable productive meetings. Members from the community will encompass four broad categories and, if necessary, be limited in numbers generally to:
One or two representatives from the local community (business or residential)
One or two representatives from the Cana subdivision
One or two residents at large.
Selection Where the number of interested participants is greater than the above stated targets, a review of applications will be completed, as found on the attached “Selection Criteria for PLC Members.” Those individuals who score the highest will be invited to participate on the PLC. All who express an interest will be provided opportunity at the Public Open House Meetings and through the feedback forms to provide valued input. If there are insufficient interested individuals from one broad category, Utilities Kingston may choose to offer an opportunity to other interested applicants. We thank you, in advance, all who are interested and submit applications. We will contact each individual who expresses interest.
-2-
Public Liaison Committee Meeting No. 2 for the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant - Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment -
August 12, 2010 14:00 to 16:00
Introductions Public Liaison Committee Members: • Ms. Arlene Aish • Mr. Basil Brosso • Dr. Kenn Feigelman Utilities Kingston Project Manager: • Mike Fischer, P.Eng. J.L. Richards Project Manager: • Michael Troop, P.Eng.
Background •
Utilities Kingston has initiated a Class Environmental Assessment to address the aging infrastructure.
•
The study is following a Schedule C Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process to ensure that decisions reflect the needs of stakeholders and that any environmental concerns are addressed or mitigated.
•
The Problem Statement is as follows: “The Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant and the associated collection system are aging and are in need of repairs and/or upgrades. An upgraded facility could also enable a higher level of treatment to ensure effluent meets current environmental legislation and best practices. Utilities Kingston has initiated a Class Environmental Assessment to determine the best course of action to improve the wastewater system in the Cana community.”
•
This project does not involve an increase in plant capacity or extension of service area.
•
Initial discussion with key agencies such as the Ministry of the Environment, Parks Canada, and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority have occurred.
Class EA Process (Schedule C)
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process Flow Chart
We are here
Courtesy of the Municipal Engineers Association Exhibit A.2 – Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, October 2000, as amended in 2007
Existing Cana WWTP Characteristics of the existing Cana WWTP: •Constructed and commissioned in 1973 •Originally owned & operated by MOE, transferred to Pittsburgh Twp in early 1990’s, then to City of Kingston during amalgamation •Designed to treat 95 m3/day (25 000 US Gal/day) •Consists of: •Pumping System •Coarse Screen •Aeration Tank •Clarifier •Chlorine Contact Tank •Outfall •Sampler •Electrical Power, Communications, and Controls
•Serves the 32-home Cana community •Discharges treated effluent to a creek which in turn discharges to Colonel By Lake
Schematic Representation of the Existing Facility
Structure of the Study This study will be facilitated through a number of separate studies including: •
Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Assimilative Capacity Assessment •Establishes acceptable effluent characteristics for an upgraded plant
•
Technical Memorandum No. 2 – Collection System Study •A study to determine required improvements to the Cana sewage collection system (investigations are underway)
•
Technical Memorandum No. 3 – Review of Alternative Solutions •Will establish the preferred alternative solution
•
Technical Memorandum No. 4 – Review of Alternative Designs •Will provide a recommendation regarding the preferred design alternative
•
Archaeological Assessment •Will ensure that archaeological concerns are addressed through the study
•
Ecological Assessment •Will ensure that ecological concerns are addressed through the study
•
Geotechnical Studies •Will be undertaken if required.
•
Environmental Study Report (ESR) •Will summarize the findings of other studies – this will be the final deliverable for the Environmental Assessment
• • • •
Public and Agency Consultation will consist of the following: Mailings Notices in the Newspaper Public Liaison Committee (has already been established) Public Information Centres
Potential Treatment Technologies • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Septic Tank & Tile Bed Peat-based Septic System Constructed Wetland Living Machine Lagoon Biofilter Conventional Activated Sludge Extended Aeration Biological Activated Filter Membrane Bioreactor Sequencing Batch Reactor Snofluent Trickling Filters
Various Studies • Ecological Assessment Field investigations and report completed – recommendations: -No ecological value except for the stream -Maintain effluent discharge in creek to maintain wetland there -Use best management practices to mitigate any work in the stream • Archaeological Study Field investigations and report completed – no elements of archaeological value noted. • Geotechnical Study None envisioned at this time. • Collection System Study (Ongoing) Fog testing did not identify problems. Dye-based techniques may be employed in the future
Schedule C Class EA - Next Steps -
•
Consider comments from this Public Information Centre and from agencies
•
Prepare for the next Public Information Centre to discuss the preferred design concept (Technical Memorandum No. 4)
•
Complete investigations in the collection system and undertake improvements
•
Ultimately, complete the Class EA process and proceed to implementation based on recommendations from the Class EA 30 Day Public Review
Annotated Aerial Photograph
September 4, 2012 Our File No. 24057
Dear Recipient: Subject:
Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Project Update Letter
Utilities Kingston has retained J.L. Richards & Associates Limited to conduct a Municipal Environmental Assessment for improvements to the Cana WWTP. The plant’s condition is deteriorating, and it is in need of repairs and upgrades. On August 31, 2010, a Public Information Centre was held to provide information on the status of the project. At that time, the recommendation was to proceed with a complete replacement of the facility. However, additional studies have been underway since that open house to further investigate an alternative option. This other option would see the existing Cana WWTP replaced with a pumping station that would pump wastewater from the Cana community to the sewer system feeding into the Ravensview WWTP. One such study has suggested that the long term life cycle and capital costs associated with a new plant could be greater than costs for a pumping station and forcemain. Additional feasibility investigations are currently underway to explore the pumping station and forcemain option. The current focus of work is to investigate possible routes and means of constructing the forcemain between the Cana community and the Ravensview sewer system south of Hwy 401. As the study continues to unfold, additional information will be made available. It is expected that the current study should be wrapped up in the fall of 2012. If a new recommendation is forthcoming, another Public Information Centre will be held. Otherwise, the project will proceed to design and construction. For questions or comments, or if you no longer wish to be notified of this study, please contact the undersigned via email at
[email protected], at the above address, or by telephone at (613) 544-1424, ext. 2231. Yours very truly, J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Michael S. Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer MST:sp cc:
Mike Fischer, P.Eng., Utilities Kingston
NOTICE OF COMPLETION: CANA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE SCHEDULE “C” CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UTILITIES KINGSTON Utilities Kingston has completed a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) for the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The Environmental Assessment was initiated to evaluate the options for improvements at the aging Cana WWTP and its collection system. The WWTP currently serves the Cana community with a treatment capacity for up to 34 homes. The recommended undertaking involves replacing the existing WWTP with a new treatment plant utilizing Sequencing Batch Reactor, equalization tanks, screening, chemically-assisted tertiary filtration, and a UV disinfection for liquid train process. The design capacity for the plant remains the same as the existing plant rating at 95 m3/d. The project is being planned under Schedule C of the Municipal Class EA. Subject to comments received as a result of this Notice, and the receipt of necessary approvals, Utilities Kingston intends to proceed with the design and construction of this project. The Environmental Study Report, which contains a summary of pertinent information compiled during the Class EA, is available online at: www.utilitieskingston.com, or in person at: Utilities Kingston 85 Lappan’s Lane Kingston, ON K7L 4X7 Mon.–Fri.: 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
City Hall, Clerks Office 216 Ontario Street Kingston, ON K7L 2Z3 Mon.–Fri.: 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
Pittsburgh Branch Public Library 80 Gore Road Kingston, ON K7K 6X6 Tue.–Thurs.: 10 a.m.–8 p.m. Sat: 9 a.m. – 5 p.m.
Comments must be provided to Utilities Kingston within 30 calendar days from the date of this Notice. Comments should be directed in writing to: Mike Fischer, P.Eng. Utilities Kingston, 85 Lappan’s Lane, P.O. Box 790, Kingston, ON K7L 4X7
[email protected] If concerns arise regarding this project, which cannot be resolved through discussion with Utilities Kingston, a person or party may request that the Minister of the Environment make an order for the project to comply with Part II of the Environmental Assessment Act (referred to as a Part II Order) which addresses individual environmental assessments. Requests must be received by the Minister at the address below within 30 calendar days of this Notice (i.e. comments are due before July 4). A copy of the request must also be sent to Utilities Kingston. If no request is received within 30 calendar days of this Notice, Utilities Kingston will be permitted to proceed to design and construction as outlined in the Environmental Study Report. Requests to the Ministry of the Environment should be directed to: Minister of the Environment 135 St. Clair Avenue, 10th Floor, Toronto, ON M4V 1P5 For more information, please feel free to contact the following: Michael Troop, P.Eng., M.Eng. Environmental Engineer J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 863 Princess Street, Suite 203 Kingston, ON K7L 5N4
[email protected] Phone: 613-544-1424 Ext. 2231
Mike Fischer, P.Eng. Utilities Engineer Utilities Kingston 85 Lappan’s Lane, P.O. Box 790 Kingston, ON K7L 4X7
[email protected] Phone: 613-546-1181 Ext. 2356
This Notice first published on June 4, 2013.
May 28, 2013 Our File No. 24057
Dear Recipient: Subject:
Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment Notice of Completion
J.L. Richards & Associates Limited has recently completed an Environmental Assessment for Utilities Kingston for the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant. The proposed works include replacing the existing WWTP with a new treatment plant utilizing sequencing batch reactor technology for liquid treatment. The design capacity for the plant remains the same as the existing plant rating at 95 m3/d. This study has been conducted in accordance with the requirements for the Schedule C projects as described in the Municipal Engineers Association’s Class EA document (2000, as amended). The Environmental Study Report, which contains pertinent information compiled during the Class EA, is now available for public review. During the 30-calendar day review period, comments should be provided directly to Utilities Kingston. Attached is the Notice of Completion for this project. If you have any comments or concerns, please contact Mike Fischer of Utilities Kingston, at 613-546-1181, Ext. 2356 (or by e-mail at
[email protected]), or the undersigned. Yours very truly, J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Michael S. Troop, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer MST/SJS:lb Attachment cc:
Mike Fischer, P.Eng., Utilities Kingston
JLR NO. 24057 Page 1 of 1
UTILITIES KINGSTON CANA WWTP UPGRADE CONTRACT: UK-09-21 CRCA DISCUSSION POST-MEETING NOTES Time and location: 09:00. January 07, 2010 at the Little Cataraqui Creek Conservation Area ATTENDEES Mike Fischer, Utilities Kingston Rob McRae, CRCA Mara Shaw, CRCA Dan Lalande, J. L. Richards & Associates Limited Michael Troop, J. L. Richards & Associates Limited
ITEM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Address notices for the study to both Rob and Mara Rideau Acres Campground is on a private system – may be a “lagoon spray” system? Parks Canada contact - Hillary Knap. She may be aware of a species at risk study being undertaken for the waterways in the lower Rideau Canal Permits – a permit will likely be required from the CRCA to change the outfall of the Cana plant, under O.Reg. 146/06, although if decommissioning is the only activity, a permit may not be required. Rob and Mara suggested that the outfall/creek may have been cleaned out in the recent past, based on discussions with the Cana residents at a recent public meeting for the source-water protection plan Good book about the Rideau Canal in the area – Book by Ken W. Watson Good turnout for the source-water protection open houses was due to CRCA’s door-to-door invitations and BBQ for the meeting. For wastewater treatment similar to Cana, CRCA suggested looking at what services stations on the 401 do with their waste. Rob will look into whether MOE funding might be available through the CRCA to address sewer laterals from homes in the Cana subdivision to reduce I/I Mara provided water level records and contact (Kerry McGonagle) for other water levels along the canal (inc. Colonel By Lake
JLR NO. 24057 Page 1 of 2
UTILITIES KINGSTON CANA WWTP UPGRADE CONTRACT: UK-09-21 MOE DISCUSSION MEETING MINUTES Time and location: 09:00. January 14, 2010 at the MOE office in Kingston, ON ATTENDEES: Mike Fischer, Utilities Kingston Kevin Riley, Utilities Kingston Vicki Mitchell, Ministry of the Environment Gillian Dagg-Foster, Ministry of the Environment Sarah Dick, Ministry of the Environment Dave Arnott, Ministry of the Environment Dan Lalande, J. L. Richards & Associates Limited Michael Troop, J. L. Richards & Associates Limited ITEM 1.
Brief introduction to the plant and the purpose of the study
2.
Utilities Kingston is not aware of any funding that will be applied to this project
3.
MOE provided copies of Guideline F-9 (The Use of Holding Tanks in Sewage Systems Under Part VIII of the Environmental Protection Act)
4.
MOE provided copies of the Certificate of Approval for the Rideau Acres campground located north of the Cana WWTP
5.
Utilities Kingston will review with the City of Kingston to determine if there is an existing easement along the ditch/creek where the existing plant outfall is located.
6.
MOE recommended initiating a dialogue with Parks Canada regarding the possibility of having an outfall from an upgraded Cana WWTP into Colonel By Lake. MOE also offered to be part of meetings, as necessary to discuss possible conflicting interests between MOE and Parks Canada with respect to the possible location of a new outfall for an upgraded WWTP.
7.
MOE suggested that Wendy Lavender in the Belleville office of the MOE would likely be involved with the project, particularly aspects dealing with source water protection.
8.
MOE agreed to review their records for studies completed in this area that might assist the Assimilative Capacity study.
9.
MOE suggested that the current outfall arrangement is not preferred and that PWQO or similar requirements would likely apply to effluent released to the ditch in an upgraded facility.
10.
Notices and information for the Environmental Assessment should be directed to Vicki Mitchell, who will direct information within MOE.
JLR NO. 24057 Page 2 of 2
UTILITIES KINGSTON CANA WWTP UPGRADE CONTRACT: UK-09-21 MOE DISCUSSION MEETING MINUTES Time and location: 09:00. January 14, 2010 at the MOE office in Kingston, ON 11.
MOE would like two hard copies and one pdf copy of all technical memoranda produced through this study for their review.
12.
JLR listed the preliminary list of solutions to the problem statement to be investigated as part of this study. MOE suggested that on-site storage of sewage and hauling by truck is probably their least preferred option, especially in light of Guideline F-9 (see point 3, above).
13.
MOE suggested that limits for effluent to the Rideau Canal system are generally 25mg/L BOD, 25mg/L SS, 1 mg/L TP, and non-toxic effluent (ammonia and chlorine)
14.
The study is expected to follow a Schedule C Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process, subject to change as the study unfolds.
Prepared by:
Michael S. Troop Distribution: Mike Fischer, Kevin Riley, Vicki Mitchell, Dan Lalande
