annual repor t 2009 Camfil Farr
Annual Repor t 2 0 0 9
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements Camfil Farr – Clean Air Solution s
COn TEn TS 2
Presentation of Camfil Farr
3
Highlights of 2009
4
CEO’s Comments
6
Business Concept
7
Core Values
8
Our Important Mission – to Provide Clean Air
10 Aiming to Become the Industry Leader in
Sustainability 13 Comfort Air Business Segment
Camfil Farr. Leading the world in clean air solutions. The Camfil Farr Group is a world leader in the production and development of air filters and clean air solutions. Camfil Farr is also one of the most global air filtration
17 Clean Processes Business Segment
specialists in the world with 23 production units and R&D
21 Power Systems Business Segment
centres in four countries in the Americas, Europe and the
25 Safety & Protection Business Segment
Asia-Pacific region.
28
Historical Review
30 Camfil Around the World Americas Europe Asia-Pacific Region Camfil Farr Power Systems Other Markets 32 Financial Analysis 2009 34 Board of Directors’ Report
and Consolidated Financial Statements 82 Auditors’ Report 83
Group Management
84 Board of Directors 85 Five-Year Summary
The Group, headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden, has approximately 3,250 employees and sales in the range of SEK 4.5 billion. International markets account for almost 90 percent of sales. The company’s business concept is to provide customers with best-in-class air filtration products and services within four main segments: Comfort Air, Clean Processes, Power Systems and Safety & Protection. With 46 years of experience in air filtration products and solutions, Camfil Farr delivers value to customers all over the world while contributing to something essential to everyone – clean air.
Highlights of 2009 Despite the global recession, 2009 was a good overall year for Camfil Farr in which the Group demonstrated its strength and readiness to cope with possible market downturns. Net sales increased to SEK 4,503 M (4,361), an increase of SEK 142 M, but decreased by 5% in fixed currency. Operating profit totalled SEK 417 M (400), corresponding to an EBIT margin of 9.3 (9.2). Sales in Europe remained stable level and increased again in Asia after last year’s negative growth. However, the financial crisis had the largest negative impact on markets in the Americas, where the Comfort Air, APC and Railroad segments all showed double-digit declines in sales. Several measures carried out to boost efficiency and expand resources: Railroad products closed in Oklahoma and relocated to other North American units; Swedish production unit (Alingsås) moved to Trosa, where a new warehouse and Nordic logistics centre was built; Comfort Air production relocated from Germany to Slovakia; new sales office and warehouse opened in southern Germany. Camfil Farr acquired its distributor in Austria, Firma Mecke Klima GmbH. The joint venture in India, Camfil Farr Air Filtration India Ltd, including Anand Industrial Filtration Systems, was integrated into Camfil Farr Power Systems. Camfil Farr published the air filtration industry’s first Sustainability Report and launched CamfilCairing, a Groupwide initiative to further develop and maintain sustainable business practices. Hi-Flo-XL, a new and revolutionary low-energy air filter series, was successfully introduced in the Nordic region.
The aftermarket for filter products, a major
CEO's comments:
component of Camfil Farr sales, was also rather stable. All together, sales were down
Continuing to write our success story W
4% year-on-year in Europe. The impact from the economic downturn was more apparent in North America, where Camfil Farr achieved strong growth in 2008. Not surprisingly, the investment climate – straight-jacketed by the financial crisis – resulted in the deferral or cancella-
e have always run a tight ship at
tion of many projects. However, even the
Camfil Farr and our organization was
aftermarket, normally less sensitive to the
mobilized in 2009 across our markets,
general economic environment, was affect-
ready to sail rough seas. When your com-
ed as customers postponed orders for
pany is ship-shape, you can weather a harsh
replacement filters. The railroad segment
storm like a recession. All in all, Camfil Farr
is an example of an entire market that was
performed reasonably well during the year,
severely impacted, with a sharp reduction
although we should keep in mind that we
in new projects and replacement orders,
rode into 2009 on top of a very high wave,
due to a lower transportation volume in
as 2008 was a record year for us in terms
general and many locomotives being taken
of sales and earnings.
out of service.
Characteristic for 2009, however, were the different categories of “bad weather”
Asia-Pacific Region
on different fronts. Camfil Farr’s global
The Asian market was one of the first to
markets were basically rather stable during
taste the bitterness of the global crisis.
2009, but varied from region to region. We
There were clear indications of an immi-
held our own in all business segments. We
nent downturn in the region already in
also fared better than our competitors.
the last quarter of 2008, especially in the semiconductor industry, on which several
Demonstrating our strength
Camfil Farr subsidiaries in Asia are rather
Considering the global recession, 2009 was
heavily dependent for cleanroom business.
a good overall year for Camfil Farr in which
However, the full-year effect of our acqui-
the Group demonstrated its strength.
sition in New Zealand, and the fact that
At this time last year, the global
In general, the positive sales contin-
China was able to bring home several large
ued to be strong in 2009. Net sales in
projects, contributed to growth of 8% for
economy stood on the brink of
2009 amounted to SEK 4,503 M (4,361),
the region, compared with 2008.
what would turn out to be the
an increase of SEK 142 M, compared
deepest downturn of the post-war
with 2008. In fixed currency, Group sales
Business segments
era. Camfil Farr was well pre-
decreased by 5%. Operating profit of the
In terms of business segments, the steady
pared but braced for the worst.
Camfil Farr Group, after depreciation and
growth of the Comfort Air segment was
amortization, amounted to SEK 417 M
paralyzed in part by the financial crisis’s
in 2009 (400), corresponding to an EBIT
impact on the new construction market,
margin of 9.3% (9.2). Let me recap 2009
which resulted in a sharp drop in sales to
briefly before commenting on what lies
air handling unit manufacturers.
The good news was that it turned out to be rather smooth sailing in most markets.
ahead for Camfil Farr.
The cyclical Clean Processes segment was severely hit by the world-wide decline
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 4
Europe and North America
in industrial production during 2009. Overall
In Europe, the downturn had no real app-
sales for Clean Processes decreased 10%
reciable impact on some markets, such as
year-on-year, but with large variations within
France, while the situation was more dif-
the segment, with negative growth in the
ficult in other European countries. Comfort
microelectronics and automotive sub-seg-
Air and Clean Processes had a more turbu-
ments but higher sales in food & beverage
lent year while other customer categories
and service.
were steadier, such as food and bever-
After several years of constant stable
age, hospitals and chemical industries.
growth, Camfil Farr Power Systems’ sales
declined 8%, compared with the year
Initiatives to maintain leadership
hold in 2009 because of all the fire fighting.
before. In regions, such as China, India and
Our good financial health in 2009 was
Now we will rev them up.
Canada, the segment achieved satisfac-
reflected in our ability to make strategic
As we enter 2010, we’re doing it from a
tory growth. Here, I would like to especially
investments while the engines of our com-
solid platform for going forward. We plan to
applaud the fine efforts of our Canadian
petitors stalled in 2009. One example is
segmentize our operations further, increas-
and Indian Power Systems units which
the acquisition of Mecke Klima GmbH, our
ing the potential of the addressable market,
performed very well in 2009.
former Austrian distributor. Investments on
and allowing us to develop our markets
Safety & Protection enjoyed robust
the technology front are another. These
from different angles and create additional
growth of 50% last year, largely due to
included the establishment of new logistics
synergies within the Group. This will also
the expanding nuclear industry in Europe.
centres in Sweden and in Germany, the
enable us to build critical mass quickly.
Air Pollution Control (APC), part of Safety
expansion of the R&D lab in Riverdale (NJ)
We’re in great shape and we have a
& Protection, has achieved a high growth
in the U.S., the addition of new mobile
strong cash flow. Our new five-year plan is
rate over the last few years. Although sales
testing units, and the development of new
in progress. It is aggressive and growth-
decreased slightly in 2009, the outlook is
in-house machinery that boosts production
oriented as usual and we intend to develop
still strong for this business. In 2009, APC
for certain filters considerably.
our business units and truly broaden the scope of what we mean by “clean air”.
expanded into Europe and Asia and addi-
Much more is in the pipeline because
tional investments will be made in these
technological leadership is a mainstay of
Furthermore, there are many positive
markets in the coming year.
the Camfil Farr Group along with commit-
air filtration trends to leverage in our
ment, reliability, teamwork and customer
business, for example, new legislation to
care and satisfaction.
promote cleaner air and higher indoor air
From a green to sustainable
We aim to sharpen our focus even more
quality, and global awareness of green-
Camfil Farr is in the clean air business
on R&D in the near term to incorporate
house gases and the need to save energy
all over the world and we added sustain-
sustainability as a standard component in
– something every ventilation system can
ability to our agenda in 2009 when we
all our products, further develop our life
do with our products.
became the first air filtration company to
cycle assessment software, increase the
All of this will favour our operations and
publish a Sustainability Report. Camfil Farr
energy efficiency of our already low-energy
we welcome the challenge as we continue
firmly believes in the importance of having
filters, lead the next generation of air qual-
to upgrade our skills, technology, broaden
sustainable operations and our current
ity awareness and help customers develop
the product range and make it easier for
programme categorizes what we have been
smarter ventilation systems.
our customers to do business with us.
enterprise
doing all the time: greening our operations
These investments, and those to come,
There’s always sunshine after rain, but
and those of our customers by providing
are a show of continuing strength and they
there will be no “calm” for us after the 2009
air filtration products offering the lowest
will benefit our customers considerably.
storm. For the international Camfil Farr, we will continue to write our success story.
energy consumption and life cycle costs while improving the environment, human
What’s on the horizon?
health and productivity.
The global economic recovery could lose
On the note of sustainability, I would like
pace later this year, dashing hopes for a
to commend our fantastic employees who
rapid escape from the downturn. It’s true
not only rallied to help us cope effectively
that the economy is growing again, but it
Alan O’Connell
with the 2009 crisis, but also responded
isn’t out of the woods yet. The world faces
President and CEO
tremendously to our sustainability initiative
a long, slow recovery, and we’re keeping on
during the year, contributing a wealth of
our eye on developments in the euro zone.
ideas and proposals to reduce our energy
We will continue to work hard from a
consumption and green our manufacturing
Gibraltar-like position in the industry, with
facilities even more.
a cadre of professionals that has delivered
Their enthusiasm was also effectively
Camfil Farr excellent results over the years.
demonstrated in our Camfilcairing activi-
We stay close to our customers, stick
ties in 2009 and the beginning of 2010.
to our core business and use common
Camfilcairing, our internal programme to
business sense. If we keep putting great
integrate sustainability and good corporate
products in front of customers, they will
citizenship, includes many volunteer com-
continue to turn to Camfil Farr.
munity initiatives in many different coun-
To increase our competitiveness year
tries. You will find this described further on
by year, we steadily evolve our organiza-
in the Annual Report.
tion, although some measures were put on
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 5
Camfil Farr’s clean air business concept Camfil Farr’s business concept is to deliver value to customers all over the world while contributing to something essential to everyone – clean air. Clean air benefits human health and well-being, safety, production and operating reliability. As the leader in air filtration, Camfil Farr realizes this concept by: >>> Developing, producing and providing the best air filtration products, systems and solutions to protect people, processes and the environment in local, regional and global markets. >>> Providing the best customer support and service in the industry, including leading-edge knowledge for any air filtration application. >>> Maintaining the best R&D, production and logistics resources for customers. >>> Being a sustainable and socially responsible supplier that maintains the highest professional standards and works to raise awareness of the importance and benefits of clean air.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 6
Camfil Farr’s core values Commitment: we are committed to do our best in all situations. As a responsible company, we consider global citizenship as part of our philosophy and also adhere to the values and principles of sustainable development. Reliability: our fundamental business principle is based on trust and transparency, the basis to build long-term relationships with our stakeholders. Teamwork: our strength and competitive advantage is, and will always be, people. We encourage cooperative efforts and knowledge sharing across all our activities and at every level of the company, to make every workday a fulfilment for our employees, as well as to provide the best service possible to our clients. Customer satisfaction: we permanently strive to im prove the quality of our products and services. We also provide filtration solutions to help our customers meet their own sustainability objectives and increase the sustainability of their facilities and operations. Local presence: wherever Camfil Farr is present, we provide products and services through an organization that understands local customer and market needs, and respects local cultural, business and environmental practices.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 7
Camfil Farr filtration technology – for a cleaner and greener world
In addition to the beneficial effects of IAQ on health, numerous studies are also pointing out the important links between good IAQ, work productivity and general well-being. This is another reason why standards and recommendations for modern air filters are being geared towards much higher filtration levels today. IAQ is also essential for production and equipment efficiency. In this arena, Camfil Farr is a key supplier of air filtration systems to customers requiring high IAQ for ultra-clean processes, for gas turbines and even locomotives. Whatever the need for clean air, Camfil Farr has a full range of air filters satisfying all requirements for particle and gas filtration. We also work “outdoors” to clean emissions and stop pollution at the source, specializing in air pollution control, supplying dust and fume collectors for heavy industrial processes, or systems to collect harmful chemicals, contain bacteria or radioactive particles.
Helping customers to save energy and select the right products Due to rising oil prices and electricity rates, the cost of cleaning, supplying and exhausting air in buildings is another major concern today. Improving the energy efficiency of
Our important mission
disease. This is catching the attention of
HVAC systems is also a way to make build-
– to provide clean air
govern mental health and environmental
ings greener and combat climate change.
agencies more and more. There are pri-
In the facilities management area,
Camfil Farr has a vital mission to carry out:
mary pollutants to remove, such as sulphur
Camfil Farr has provided guidance and
to provide clean air to protect people, proc-
dioxide, nitric oxides and volatile organic
solutions for customers for years, demon-
esses, equipment and the environment,
compounds; secondary pollutants like
strating time after time – in lab tests and
both indoors and outdoors.
ozone from photochemical processes; and
real operating conditions – that it always
Within the heating, ventilation and air
solid pollutants – the fine particles in air,
pays to buy quality Camfil Farr air filters
conditioning (HVAC) industry, clean air is
such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,
with a low pressure drop, instead of low-
usually associated with Indoor Air Quality
identified as a potential cause of cancer,
cost products with poorly functioning filter
(IAQ), which is essential for providing a
which can find their way into our lungs and
media and/or insufficient filtration area.
comfortable and healthy indoor environ-
even penetrate into our bloodstream.
ment for the well-being of people.
Camfil Farr has also pioneered and
Today’s sharper focus on harmful
developed Life Cycle Cost (LCC) software
IAQ is being focused on more than ever
gases, such as ozone, has also stimulated
for performing HVAC system analyses,
because human beings spend 80 percent
the development of filters for molecular
allowing customers to choose the right fil-
of their time in indoor spaces, making IAQ
filtration of supply air, which are now being
ter for the right application for the right air
a key aspect of public health. The air we
specified and used in facilities such as com-
cleanliness. A Camfil Farr analysis typically
breathe today is also more heavily and
mercial and public buildings in urban envi-
shows that energy accounts for 70 percent
diversely polluted than before, increasing
ronments. Regulatory and pollution control
of a filter’s LCC, while the actual cost of
both the amount and complexity of the
efforts are setting protective health-based
the filter represents only 15-20 percent,
pollutants in the atmosphere that find their
standards for ozone in the air we breathe
with the balance being disposal and labour
way into ventilation systems.
and creating programmes to clean up air,
costs. With the right filter, energy consump-
reduce harmful emissions and influence
tion in air handling units can be reduced
ozone’s impact by the way we live.
without compromising IAQ. A new and more
As air pollution increases, so does the risk of respiratory illness and heart
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 8
comprehensive LCC software tool was
determine the greenness of facilities.
A number of these industries, such as phar-
Regulating authorities and policymak-
maceuticals and food and beverage, are
ers are also setting out various categories
required to comply with global standards
As energy and climate change con-
of outdoor air quality, several categories
and regulations for hygienic production,
cerns grow, Camfil Farr is continuing to
of desirable indoor air quality (IAQ) and the
which in turn requires stringent air cleanli-
make its mark and contribution to the
air filtration steps to advance from one
ness standards provided by high efficiency
energy efficiency of our customers by
category to another.
HVAC and filtration systems.
launched for customers in the beginning of 2010.
offering new environmentally friendly and
When designing mechanical supply and
As customers move across borders
low-energy products like the new Hi-Flo ®
exhaust ventilation systems, consideration
and regions, Camfil Farr’s products and
XL generation of filters, and new tools to
has to be given to the quality of the outdoor
systems follow them and can be supplied
analyze real-life filter performance, such
air around a building or proposed location
through the Group’s multi-regional produc-
as S.A.V.E.R., which helps building own-
of a facility. Atmospheric dust and particles
tion and logistics infrastructure. Products
ers manage costs associated with any air
come in different concentrations and parti-
are also developed in state-of-the art facili-
handling systems and to select and main-
cle sizes that have to be eliminated to fulfil
ties at four regional R&D centres. As a
tain the filters they use.
hygienic and IAQ requirements. The same
service-driven business, Camfil Farr also
Camfil Farr has also developed and
goes for the presence of potential aller-
places the strictest of demands on its own
introduced an Energy and Quality Rating
gens, carcinogenic pollutants from traffic,
production quality and logistics to ensure
System in Europe that is completely trans-
odours and gases.
that customers get the right product when
parent and gives customers the data and
For example, standards are being intro-
facts they need for choosing the right
duced to monitor nitrogen oxide emissions
Clean air is an essential commodity for
Camfil Farr filter for the application at hand.
in high-risk zones like urban communities
people, buildings and industry all over the
In the United States, Camfil Farr is also
near roadways. Here, Camfil Farr is leading
planet. Camfil Farr, as the global leader in
in the forefront of energy ratings for air
the industry by developing dual-action com-
air filtration technology, has the know-how
filters and classifies filters according to the
bination particle and molecular air filters
and professional staff and resources to
Energy Cost Index, a system that rates a
to remove harmful external urban pollution
ensure its supply and maintenance all over
filter’s energy usage and its ability to main-
from ventilation air distributed in public
the world.
tain published efficiency over its lifetime.
and commercial buildings, or in museums,
In addition, initiatives are being carried out to make it easier for customers to
they want it.
where pollutants can deteriorate valuable
Sustainability for a bright future
artefacts and art treasures.
In 2009, Camfil Farr became the first air
do business with Camfil Farr. To facilitate
These urban pollutants are requiring
filtration company in the world to publish
ordering and purchasing, new versions of
the use of finer filters to filter outdoor air,
a corporate Sustainability Report. Leading
Camfil Farr’s Web shops also went online in
recycled air and exhaust air. This is driving
efforts in this area, within our industry, is
Sweden and Finland during 2009. Additional
the choice of filters towards products of
a way to maintain the company’s global
e-business sites are planned or in progress
higher efficiency, a Camfil Farr specialty.
leadership position, retain the respect of
There are other signs that IAQ is a
the market and strengthen Camfil Farr’s
Camfil Farr has also entered another
growing concern among governments and
credibility as the greenest air filtration
new product area by launching the
the public, such as increased site monitor-
company in the world.
CamCleaner series of room air cleaners.
ing of indoor air quality, new devices for
Camfil Farr has always been clean and
These mobile units, equipped with HEPA
proactive IAQ surveys, the emergence of
green, so our sustainability efforts are a
micro-filters, address the need for an easy-
more and more IAQ assessment consult-
continuation of what we have always done.
to-implement solution for providing addi-
ants and remedial contractors, and the
We are basically greening our operations
tional filtration, and creating a cleaner and
creation of indoor air pollution databases,
further by designing more sustainability
healthier workplace, in everything from
programmes and guidelines.
into Camfil Farr products, recognizing that
in other countries.
small offices and rooms, to large commercial and public premises.
A growing regulatory
All these factors combined will help grow the market for effective air filtration,
HVAC industry is facing increased pressure
responsibility are all interlinked.
especially for filters offering the highest
We are looking forward to a bright and
efficiency and lowest energy consumption.
sustainable future with our customers. For further information, see the summary of
environment In many countries around the world, the
the economy, the environment and social
An expanding and sustainable business
our present sustainability programme in the Board of Directors’ Report and on our corporate website.
from green initiatives of governments and
As economies in new markets develop, the
their environmental agencies to reduce
market for air filtration expands and rides
You can read more about Camfil Farr’s entire
energy consumption and alleviate the
on the wave of globalization trends. Asia,
operations, product range and international
effects of climate change. For example,
Eastern Europe and India are examples of
organization by visiting www.camfilfarr.com
Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) has now
regions where major international indus-
emerged as a new term to analyze and
tries have expanded and set up business.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 9
Aiming to become the industry leader in sustainability Camfil Farr is a recognized leader in providing clean air solutions to a broad range of customers for numerous applications and industries. For more close to 50 years, our approach has been to provide clients with the “right” air quality at the lowest possible total cost. We have always helped customers recognize that energy costs, maintenance, disposal and purchase price are each important elements of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for our products, which reduce their energy consumption, carbon emissions, transportation costs and solid waste disposal. We carried out these pioneering efforts long before “sustainability” and “greenness” became fashionable terms. In 2009, Camfil Farr embarked on the mission to become the first sustainable air filtration company in the world and also published the industry’s first corporate Sustainability Report on a voluntary basis. In Camfil Farr’s view, sustainability is vital for continuing growth as well as essential for understanding the social and environmental concerns of customers, employees and other stakeholders. We recognize that climate change and a growing awareness about conserving resources in society also requires responsible actions and solutions from the air filtration industry. Delivering high IAQ, reducing the energy consumption of air handling systems with better filters, and continuing our cradle-to-grave approach to product management will all play a role in this process.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 10
Sustainability initiatives in 2009 Driving the industry towards true sustainability and reducing our own environmental footprint involves steady improvement of company processes, practices and products from a sustainability standpoint, as well as designing sustainability into Camfil Farr products and services. During 2009 we set up a consistent approach to communicating sustainability through five main directions: energy efficiency, indoor air quality, green products, the supply chain, and risk assessment and management. The Group’s sustainability programme was launched early in the year, internally through the CamfilCairing initiative, and externally with the publication of the Sustainability Report and information on Camfil Farr’s corporate website.
at Camfil Farr’s 23 production facilities are trained in sustainability and related compliance activities, guidelines and policies. All this work is closely developed, supervised and coordinated by the Corporate Sustainability Officer to ensure a helicopter view of sustainability efforts and to monitor progress towards goals. The majority of production facilities have implemented extensive energy and resource conservation programmes, among other measures. Camfil Farr’s sustainability programme also strives to follow the UN’s Global Compact Principles and Global Reporting Initiative, which comprise the regulations and guidelines for how the Group reports its own sustainability initiatives.
Essential for the future Customers who have already integrated corporate social respon-
Internal Camfilcairing programme “Camfilcairing” is the framework and name of the internal programme to integrate sustainability and corporate citizenship in every aspect of our business strategy. The name is built around Camfil, our environment, caring and air – key words that are to be associated with the Camfil Farr name. Camfilfcairing and the Group’s sustainability mission were launched simultaneously at all subsidiaries in early 2009. Sustainability guidelines and policies were formulated for Camfil Farr’s day-to-day operations. These also comprise the basis for Camfilcairing activities, which in 2009 embraced energy conservation programmes, life cycle assessments to mitigate the environmental impact of products and operations, the introduction of green transportation modes and co-ordinated shipments in
sibility (CSR) in their operations now appreciate having a primary CSR/sustainability contact within the Camfil Farr Group. Financial institutions have also given positive feedback on the first Sustainability Report and a second will be published in the spring of 2010. Experts on CSR issues recognise the relevance of our actions and have no doubts about Camfil Farr’s strong commitment and long track record. Camfil Farr wants to be the leader in a business we are currently leading. We want the rest of the air filtration industry to follow our example. For more information about our sustainbility programme, please download our corporate Sustainability Report. http://www.camfilfarr.com/campaign/sustainability/
Europe and the U.S., and caring for people in our local markets through community initiatives. During 2009, data from sustainability measurements were also compiled and action plans developed for energy efficiency, the indoor climate, environmental products, suppliers and risk management. These efforts are continuing and will involve further refinement of policies and guidelines and an evaluation of how they are functioning at our companies and plants around the world and within the operations of suppliers. In early 2010, the second Camfilcairing Week was also held across the Group. As in 2009, employees were actively engaged in a wide variety of sustainability-related activities ranging from sharing local good practices and green tips for the office, to reporting on local sustainability activities, such as gender equality and employee health programmes, and verification assessment activities for energy conservation at facilities. Local community initiatives were also carried out extensively (photo).
Sustainability guidelines and policies for 23 production facilities on 4 continents Camfil Farr conducts business in the Americas, Europe and AsiaPacific region. To ensure effective and uniform implementation of the Group’s sustainability measures, designated representatives
“Camfilcairing” involves in-house sustainability initiatives ranging from energy conservation and green transportation to reducing environmental impact. In one of the activities conducted in 2009, Camfil Farr Thailand planted 500 trees to reforest and protect mangroves threatened by coastal erosion and possible inundation in Samutsongklam Province. Several key customers participated in the effort. Photographer: Supansa Keautthong, Customer Service Department, Camfil Farr Thailand.
C A M FI L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 1 1
Business a re a :
Comfort Air – protecting people Air filters for ventilation systems in schools, office buildings, hotels and similar public and commercial facilities to provide clean air for high indoor air quality (IAQ), a healthy and more productive working environment and reduce energy consumption.
Comfort Air 45 percent of Group sales
The Comfort Air business
Research proves that filters with high efficiency very
segment accounts for almost
effectively reduce problems that small particles can
half of Group sales. Most
cause for sensitive people, especially in urban environ-
air filters for this segment
ments. It has been documented that people gener-
are installed in ventilation
ally perform and feel better in a healthy indoor climate
systems in schools, offices,
supplied with clean filtered air.
homes, hospitals and air-
In many countries, concerns about the harmful
ports, among other facilities,
effects of gases, such as bad ozone, have also stimulated
in order to provide the basis for a clean and healthy
regulatory efforts to set protective health-based stand-
indoor environment. A well-designed ventilation solution
ards for the air people breathe, as well as programmes
with high-performance filters also reduces operating
to clean up air and reduce harmful emissions.
costs for the customer and reduces energy consumption significantly.
In today’s energy-conscious society, customers are also reducing the power consumption of their ventilation
Since the Comfort Air market consists mainly of
systems to reduce operating costs and improve the
replacement filters, operations in this segment are
overall greenness of their facilities. The cost to venti-
relatively insensitive to fluctuations in the economy.
late a building is significant. The typical energy cost
Customers include facilities management companies,
of filters, as a percentage of the total HVAC system, is
local government agencies and buildings, as well as
approximately 30%. Selecting the correct filter efficiency
companies providing ventilation and air conditioning
and lowest pressure
service to offices, hotels, restaurants, airports and
drop can create sig-
similar public facilities.
nificant savings on
In Europe, bag filters are dominant, with the Hi-Flo ®
energy while maintain-
and energy-saving Hi-Flo XL® filters being the common
ing healthy Indoor Air
products. In the U.S., compact filters with pleated filter
Quality (IAQ). Camfil
media are more common. The best known are Camfil
Farr offers the most
Farr’s 30/30 ® and Durafil® pleated panel filters.
energy-efficient filters
The need for effective air filtration is becoming more and more obvious to people all around the world.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 14
on the market.
T H E R E F E R E N C E I N S TA L L AT I O N S O N T H E S E PA G E S R E P R E S E N T T Y P I C A L R E C E N T D E L I V E R I E S A N D S O L U T I O N S F R O M T H E C A M F I L FA R R G R O U P.
A healthier and happier hospital. What does a major general hospital do when it wants to eliminate poor indoor air quality and ventilation problems in public spaces and operating theatres? Ask Martini Hospital (Netherlands) and its maintenance specialist Wolter en Dros, which contacted Camfil Farr to find a solution. A competitor’s synthetic filters were causing pressure surges in the ventilation system and losing their efficiency. As a test, Camfil Farr supplied a complete set of its own filters for one filtration unit, analyzed the results and performed a particle count after two months showing a major difference between the performance and efficiency of Camfil Farr glass-fibre filters vs. synthetic filters. Two life cycle cost reports also specified the large energy savings and reduced filter change costs with Camfil Farr filters. Today, Martini has switched 100 percent to Camfil Farr products, pays less for energy and has a significantly improved filtration plan with the added advantage of a secure ventilation system with a smaller carbon footprint.
Keeping ar t fine for future generations. Camfil Farr, a recognized expert in molecular filtration, has designed and supplied activated carbon filtration systems to preserve the art treasures and artefacts of many prestigious museums and galleries around the world, including the Uffizi in Florence, the British Library in London and Moderna Museet in Stockholm. Forced or natural ventilation introduces external particulate or molecular pollutants in museums, especially in city centre locations. Sulphur dioxide blackens old paintings, oxides of nitrogen corrode bronzes and stone sculptures, and ozone accelerates the ageing and deterioration of paper, textile and other organic materials. Camfil Farr’s activated carbon filters provide a very cost-effective method of controlling these harmful gases. Various grades of material can be used in filters to meet specific preventative conservation requirements. Typical products include filters from the Camcarb, Camsure and GDM series, and special urban pollution filters like Citysorb and Cityflo. Camfil Farr also helps cultural facilities reduce their energy costs and carbon footprint by recommending a selection of the right filters with the least flow resistance, or pressure drop, to reduce power consumption of the ventilation system and improve operating economy.
Dropping c o s t s w i t h l o w p re s s u re d ro p . Emory Healthcare in the U.S. knows that issues like indoor air quality affect cleanliness. The health care provider recently took the opportunity to upgrade its IAQ, with the added advantage of substantially reduced filtration costs, by replacing the synthetic filters for its 90,000 cubic-feet-per-minute (2,549 m3/min) air handling unit system with three energy-rated filters from Camfil Farr: 30/30, Hi-Flo and Durafil. Pressure drop is central to decisions on filtration because of its correlation with both filter performance and energy consumption. The three Camfil Farr filters with an energy cost index of five stars are stellar performers because they maintain their efficiency over their life and use less energy to move air through the filter. Eleven months after Emory’s upgrade, pressure drop was less than one third of the previous level, impacting power requirements and cutting energy costs. Final filter service life was also extended from 12 to 24 months for significant savings. Considering only the cost of energy to operate the air handling system, the return on investment is normally less than one year for 5 Star filters from Camfil Farr.
M a k i n g t h e c a s e f o r e n e rg y s a v i n gs . Filters fi t f o r K i n g ’s .
Snare for bad city air. Heavily polluted air is a constant challenge in Bergen, the second largest city in Norway. Recently, the situation was made worse by unusually cold weather and the lack of wind which nearly forced the municipality to close schools and day centres in the most polluted areas of northern Bergen. To improve overall indoor air quality in urban areas, Norway’s leading indoor climate contractor, GK Norge A/S, recommends installing Camfil Farr’s energy-efficient City-Flo XL for particulate and molecular filtration. Camfil Farr develops new innovative products to deal with the growing need for higher and healthier indoor air quality (IAQ) in city environments and City-Flo XL has a proven broad spectrum capability against concentrations of most indoor and outdoor pollutants. These filters remove particles, odours and gases, including ozone, VOCs, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and carbon dioxide, to provide occupants with the highest level of IAQ as set out in European Standard EN13779. GK Norge is also working for switching to City-Flo XL for its HVAC service contracts in Oslo.
The fact that an air filter does not have a plug attached to it does not mean that it does not affect energy consumption. The more effective surface area of Camfil Farr filters in relation to the air flow reduces resistance and consequently the energy consumption of air handling systems. Ask King’s College in London. After conducting an air handling plant assessment, Camfil Farr is helping King’s College to secure major savings on its air conditioning plant. Over several buildings, including 28 air handling units, savings are projected to be GBP 55,000 over 5 years with a capital payback of less than 12 months. This is being accomplished in part by installing low-energy Camfil Farr filters. Other sustainable gains include improved air quality and savings on filters, energy, labour and waste disposal.
In today’s increasingly energy-conscious society, all kinds of manufacturers are reducing the power consumption of their facilities to cut costs and improve the overall greenness of their operations. This was the case for the international pharmaceutical company Lundbeck (Denmark), which requested an on-site test with Camfil Farr’s new Hi-Flo XLT filter. The test documented substantial savings and made this filter a natural choice for Lundbeck’s air handling units. Hi-Flo XLT is a member of the Hi-Flo XL series of filters that combine cost efficiency, environmental thinking and low energy consumption all in the same series. Compared with most standard pocket filters on the market, Hi-Flo XL filters can reduce the operating cost of a ventilation system because they keep pressure drop low over a longer period. The ventilation system operates more efficiently and uses less energy when the speed of the fan is reduced in the air handling unit.
Ta m i n g o f t h e f l u . The A/H1N1 influenza virus, or swine flu pandemic, prompted preventive emergency measures globally to avoid its transmission and reduce the number of potential deaths. The flu can be spread through airborne droplets generated from coughing, sneezing or talking, or it can be contracted from contact with body secretions and the eyes, nose or mouth. Camfil Farr responded by briefing customers and medical/critical care facilities on recommended filtration solutions for preventing contamination risk and also developed the Pandemic Barrier 20 and 2000, two highly efficient air filters for particle sizes less than 80 nanometres in size. These filters provide effective protection against bacteria or viruses in air handling systems with high security and hygiene requirements.
C A M FI L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 1 5
Business segm e n t :
Clean Processes – protecting processes Camfil Farr’s filters and clean air solutions are used in most industries where demands for extremely clean air are crucial for manufacturing processes. Customers include the microelectronics, pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, and automotive industries.
Clean air is an important
In clean manufacturing processes, filtration often takes
requirement in many pro-
place in several stages, where pre-filtration is first
duction processes. There
carried out to protect the high-efficiency particulate
are
require-
air (HEPA) and ultra-low particulate air (ULPA) filters,
ments for ultra-clean air
which are much more complex and require a larger
in cleanroom applications.
investment. Pre-filters here are similar to those used
Semiconductors,
pharma-
in the Comfort Air sector. HEPA filters often cover the
ceuticals, food and beverages have to be produced
entire ceiling in a cleanroom environment. Megalam® is
in strictly controlled environments, where very small
a typical final stage filter for clean processes. The need
and undesirable particles can be devastating and lead
for gas filtration is steadily increasing. Camfil Farr has
Clean Processes 31 percent of Group sales
stringent
to biocontamination, product spoilage and high costs.
developed the Gigapleat ® for this purpose, among other
Using effective air filtration to combat microbiological
molecular filters.
contamination of foodstuffs, for example, is highly regulated to ensure the safety of food and protect human health. Other critical filtration applications in this business sector include paint spraying facilities for the automotive industry, which demand a constant supply of fresh filtered air for performance, hygiene and safety reasons, and hospital operating theatres, which need cleanroom conditions to eliminate airborne infectious contaminants. Camfil Farr supplies complete ceiling systems for hospital surgery and has also pioneered a range of supply and exhaust housings specifically for the biopharmaceutical industry, including high-temperature filters and bag-in, bag-out systems for containing contaminants.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 18
T H E R E F E R E N C E I N S TA L L AT I O N S O N T H E S E PA G E S R E P R E S E N T T Y P I C A L R E C E N T D E L I V E R I E S A N D S O L U T I O N S F R O M T H E C A M F I L FA R R G R O U P.
Best products for best value proposition. A number of major pharmaceutical companies world-wide have been signing multi-year HVAC supply and installation contracts with Camfil Farr, converting to our filter products to replace HEPA filters, coarse-fibre synthetic box and bag filters, and low-grade pre-filters. Camfil Farr’s best value for money proposition has been demonstrated time-after-time in filter tests proving the winning benefits of Camfil Farr products in terms of filtration efficiency, low pressure drop, and long operating life, which can substantially improve the operating economy of energyintensive air handling systems in pharma plants while also safeguarding the all-important cleanliness of their production environment. These agreements often require networking with global engineering teams and facility engineers, on-site filter tests in real manufacturing conditions, and close collaboration with international procurement units. Camfil Farr is the only air filtration company that can truly offer the technical support and global coverage that pharma companies need to leverage their global investments in air filtration, capitalize on the energy reduction opportunity with Camfil Farr air filters and keep their plants cleaner and greener in the face of economic uncertainty or volatility in energy prices.
Hot appli c a t i o n . The Italian-based Marchesini Group is one of the largest international providers of packaging machinery for pharmaceuticals, food and cosmetics, and its NERI subsidiary has a long tradition in designing and manufacturing sterilization tunnels. For years, NERI has conducted research in collaboration with Camfil Farr to design high-temperature filters that maintain their integrity and rated performance values in applications with extremely high temperatures. Marchesini’s new NLT 60S-C depyrogeneration tunnel with sterilization line has been specially engineered to incorporate Camfil Farr’s Termikfil high-temperature filter with microfine glass media. Termikfil is the only HEPA filter guaranteed to operate for a minimum of one year at a temperature of 350°C/662°F while maintaining the leak-free integrity required to pass validations. The filter is typically installed in high-temperature depyrogeneration and sterilization processes, which use a laminar flow of hot air to eliminate viable matter and reduce the amount of endotoxin on ampoules, vials or other containers used in pharmaceutical processing and distribution.
Clean for vaccine.
Good filtration goes underground. Mass transit systems help relieve massive city congestion and their energy consumption and emissions are a fraction of those of the individual transportation vehicles they replace. As the leading supplier of air filters for subway cars in North America, Camfil Farr provides filters for the cooling air of traction motors to keep the interior of motors clean – allowing them to run cooler and reducing motor failure – and for breathing air to improve the cleanliness of car interiors, passenger air quality and the efficiency of air conditioning systems. Because of size and pressure drop limitations, Camfil Farr’s R30/30WR pleated panel filters give the best combination of efficiency, pressure drop and long life in on-board subway air filtration systems. Camfil Farr’s Railroad Products group also manufactures a wide range of products for the rail and transit industries, including exhaust components and air and liquid filtration products for locomotives.
The new state-of-the art plant of a major drug manufacturer in the U.S. – the most automated pharmaceuticals facility in the world – produces vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella and shingles. When completed, the site will eventually manufacture two-thirds of the company’s live virus stock. The automatic vial distribution system can handle more than 100,000 doses of product in an aseptic manufacturing environment and the plant includes the latest lyophiliser line for filling and sealing vials of glass. The cleanroom areas of this flagship site utilize a large number of Camfil Farr’s Pharmaseal terminal housings, Megalam filters in Cleanpack ceiling grids and other areas, as well as 30/30 and Durafil filters in all air handling units for fine-fibre efficiency, minimum energy consumption and long filter life. The Pharmaseal ducted ceiling module has been made the standard for clean room air filtration at a number of production plants belonging to this pharma group.
C A M FI L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 1 9
Business segm e n t :
Power Systems – protecting gas turbines Camfil Farr is a leading supplier of heavy-duty filtration and noise control equipment for the gas turbines used by major power-generating and offshore operators worldwide. Solutions include air inlet filtration systems, acoustic enclosures and ventilation, exhaust systems, diverter dampers, ducting, silencers, de-icing systems, and service and refurbishment.
Power Systems 17 percent of Group sales
Protecting equipment such
Turbines are also sensitive to inlet system resistance,
as gas turbines, compres-
which requires large filter surfaces to maintain a low
sors and diesel engines is
average pressure drop.
a key Camfil Farr segment.
Camfil Farr Power Systems is a global partner that
Air filtration and noise con-
can support customers with complete packages for all
trol equipment has been
gas turbine applications by leveraging its proprietary
supplied to thousands of
expertise in the field and Camfil Farr's global presence
installations all over the globe, assuring reliable and efficient operation of power generation systems and other production processes.
and market-leading technology in air filtration. Today, Camfil Farr products are being used in every conceivable operating environment around the world to
Demand for energy and reliable power is stimulating
protect gas turbines from erosion and fouling for higher
demand for gas turbines and other power production
efficiency and production economy, and longer running
equipment. Air filtration for air intakes, enclosures,
times with lower emissions. Land-based, offshore, and
silencers and cooling systems for gas turbines are one
marine systems
of the cornerstones of Camfil Farr’s expanding interna-
are supplied, as
tional business.
well as retrofits
Since high-performance gas turbines typically operate in some of the most severe environments, their filtration systems are involving increasingly higher grades of efficiency in pre-filtration and the final filtration stage – including the use of HEPA filters – to keep guide vanes and turbine blades in perfect shape.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 22
and upgrades.
T H E R E F E R E N C E I N S TA L L AT I O N S O N T H E S E PA G E S R E P R E S E N T T Y P I C A L R E C E N T D E L I V E R I E S A N D S O L U T I O N S F R O M T H E C A M F I L FA R R G R O U P.
Powering up for the next Winter Olympics.
In the pipeline again with HemiPleat ® . One of the original four large infrastructure projects in China’s tenth five-year plan (2001-05) was the construction of the West-East Gas Pipeline (WEGP), which transports clean fuel from Xinjiang to the energy-hungry Yangtze River Delta. Energy giants like the Royal Dutch/Shell Group, Russia’s Gazprom and Exxon Mobil participated in this first pipeline project. So did Camfil Farr Power Systems (CFPS), which supplied a total of 77 Tenkay Hemipleat inlet pulse filter systems for 30 MW gas turbines running gas compressors at 18 gas compression stations along the pipeline. Each system is equipped with 240 filter elements. Another 27 filter units have been confirmed for connecting pipelines in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. Tenkay Hemipleat is designed for pulse cleaning cartridges and uses state-of-the-art pleating technology for superior performance. The filter’s new PolyTech HE media is an advanced pulse-cleaned media combining high efficiency and high cleanability with low pressure drop.
With Vancouver finished, it’s already high time to plan for the next Winter Olympics which will be held in Sochi, Russia. The Olympics are always a huge major world event and getting all the people together, and running all the activities, will also require a lot of electric power. As a well known supplier of inlet systems for the power generation industry, Camfil Farr Power Systems (CFPS) has been selected to supply air inlet filtration systems for the gas turbine power plants providing electric power and heat for the Olympic Village and town of Sochi. These systems will provide clean and silenced air for seven gas turbines with a total installed power of 450 MW. The inlet systems will be installed on three Siemens SGT-800s and four Ansaldo Energia V64.3A gas turbines.
The louver that outmanoeuvres snow and rain. Camfil Farr Power Systems’ product range includes the CamVane droplet separator, a heavy-duty and highly effective rain protection unit solving moisture problems that affect the performance of ventilation or filtration systems. The louvered CamVane, typically installed in the air intake filtration system of gas turbines operating in marine environments and coastal areas, has recently found new applications in Sweden. One is at the Karolinska Institute, one of Europe’s largest medical universities, where CamVane units prevent snow or rain from being drawn in the hospital’s sensitive indoor environment. Another is the Malmö Sports Arena, where the separator stops drifting snow from entering the ventilation system. By preventing rain and fine droplets from entering, the complete air intake system has a better chance to perform as expected and provide the expected Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) or equipment protection.
A growin g m a r k e t . The two main market drivers for Camfil Farr Power Systems are the growing demand for electric power and the shrinking level of the world’s known oil reserves. Global electricity demand is forecast to increase strongly up to 2030, and will mostly likely grow more with the implementation of coal gasification technology combined with CO2 separation technology. Greater use of biogas can also add valuable growth when it comes to clean and decentralised power generation. Since high-performance gas turbines typically operate in some of the most severe environments, their filtration systems are involving increasingly higher grades of efficiency in pre-filtration and the final filtration stage – including the use of HEPA filters – to keep guide vanes and turbine blades in perfect shape. Turbines are also sensitive to inlet system resistance, which requires large filter surfaces to maintain a low average pressure drop.
C A M FI L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 2 3
Business segm e n t:
Safety & Protection – protecting the environment Camfil Farr is the industry leader in high-efficiency particle/gas filtration and containment systems for nuclear power plants and also specializes in biocontainment systems and filter housings for high-risk facilities, such as biosafety labs studying disease. Camfil Farr filters are also used in the chemical, biological and space industries. The business segment also designs and develops Air Pollution Control (APC) products for dust collection in the manufacturing, pharmaceutical and mining industries in the Americas, Europe and Asia.
Emissions from dirty and
Dust collection for pollution control and product re-
potentially dangerous proc-
covery is another fast-growing area in this segment. The
esses, such as nuclear power
main markets are currently North America, Europe and
generation, mining, labora-
Asia, where saving energy and increasing production
Safety & Protection
tory research and chemical
efficiency, while controlling indoor air quality, is a chal-
7 percent of Group sales
factories, can harm human
lenging aspect of plant management. The metalwork-
beings and nature. Camfil
ing, pharmaceutical and mining industries are typical
Farr's filter solutions are designed to prevent emissions of foul-smelling and unhealthy substances that constitute a direct threat to people and the environment. The high-tech end of this market consists of biocontainment systems – a Camfil Farr specialty – which include everything from systems for sterile and particlefree air in mini-environments, to special high-security housings for high-risk laboratories, buildings and environments, biosafety cabinets for hazardous materials, high-temperature filters for sterilisation processes, bag in-bag out systems for handling contaminants and specially designed terminal and exhaust housings. Biopharma facilities, high-security research labs, nuclear power plants and chemical factories use these systems, among other customers.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 26
customers. A significant part of the market consists of changeable filters.
T H E R E F E R E N C E I N S TA L L AT I O N S O N T H E S E PA G E S R E P R E S E N T T Y P I C A L R E C E N T D E L I V E R I E S A N D S O L U T I O N S F R O M T H E C A M F I L FA R R G R O U P.
Dust coll e c t i o n t h a t ’s a s g o o d as gold f o r O y s t a r.
Quality and speed for customer satisfaction. Like the rest of the Group, Camfil Farr APC values its relationships with customers and is highly service-minded. When a U.S. company operating one of the largest blast and paint facilities in Northern Indiana accidentally lost its Gold Series dust collector in a fire, it was on its way to being shut down for not being able to collect blasting dust at their facility. Camfil Farr was contacted and a new GS16 collector was shipped on a Friday and installed by the following Monday with no loss of production for the customer. The new collector was delivered personally by Camfil Farr’s own field service technician.
There are two key concerns when handling potential dust generated in connection with the production of pharmaceuticals: the potent, toxic or allergenic properties of the compound as it relates to personnel exposure, and the explosion properties of the compound. In most cases, dust containment is required. This is why an international leader in pharmaceutical equipment like UK-based Oystar needs a top-notch dust collector partner that can offer genuine global support. Since ATEX safety directives and full containment of dust are of paramount importance to Oystar Manesty’s customers, the company chose Camfil Farr APC as its supplier and the Gold Series® Camtain™ (GSC) as its collector. Due to its build quality, strength and very simple and extremely quick filter-change system, the GSC is a used for a variety of pharmaceutical dust collection applications, including tablet presses, coating, fluid bed drying, spray drying, blending, granulation and general room ventilation. Pharmaceutical companies are using GSC dust collectors in North, South and Central America, Asia and Europe today.
Filters for a mouse house in space. In 2009, Camfil Farr filters were integrated into the Mice Drawer System (MDS) facility whose development, funded by the Italian Space Agency (ASI), has been carried out by an industrial consortium led by Thales Alenia Space Italia (Milan plant). The MDS has been designed to support the execution of scientific experiments on board the International Space Station (ISS), using mice as a model. In its first mission, from August 28 to November 27, 2009, the MDS supported the research of Professor R. Cancedda to study human bone formation and specific counter-measures to prevent osteoporosis. The MDS facility, deployed in the JEM module of the ISS, was equipped with five custom filters designed and built by Camfil Farr Sweden on behalf of Thales Alenia Space Italia. The filters ensured the prevention of possible microbiological contamination through air exchanged between the ISS cabin and the MDS. This was Camfil Farr’s second venture into space – we also designed the filters for the Mars Pathfinder mission (1997) to prevent contamination of the Martian atmosphere from bacteria and spores. Camfil Farr Sweden has also been the air filter supplier for Bradford Engineering’s Portable Glovebox (PGB), a multi-user facility for biological research during longduration space flights on the ISS.
A trusted p a r t n e r s h i p . AREVA, ranked first in the global nuclear power industry, provides customers with nuclear power solutions for carbon-free power generation and electricity transmission. In 2009, the company named Camfil Farr France an AREVA certified supplier, which required meeting almost 25 different criteria regarding quality, sustainable development values, competitiveness, innovation, R&D, safety, security and the environment. Camfil Farr, with more than 50 years of experience in the nuclear power industry, has furnished more than 90 nuclear power plants around the world with air filtration systems handling toxic, hazardous, and radioactive gas streams. Products range from HEPA filters to housings for particle/gas filtration, containment and safe changes of used filters, as well dampers and mobile filter units. All meet applicable government and industry codes and qualifications and the stringent standards of the international nuclear power industry.
Dust busting. Camfil Farr’s Air Pollution Control (APC) teams in Europe and Australia recently helped two key customers with a dust containment solution and a retrofit based on the highly efficient Gold Series® dust collector and HemiPleat® cartridge concept. In Spain, Camfil Farr APC Europe helped a manufacturer deal with dust issues related to the company’s mixing and blending suite for a blood pressure medication. A Gold Series GS-4 dust collector was installed with a ventilator, explosion suppression system and control panel designed for the application. The chemical suppression system includes a chemical barrier system to isolate the GS-4 collector and prevent an explosion from entering the duct system. In Australia, Camfil Farr APC teamed up with its appointed technical distributor to supply a Gold Series dust collector and retrofit a competitor’s oval cartridge collector with Hemipleat® cartridges. The GS-4 cleans blasting grit from a large abrasive blasting booth and recycles only usable grit returns to the blasting pot.
Molecular for kids. For the first time, paediatric researchers have apparently linked pre-natal exposure to air pollution with lower IQ scores in early childhood. The findings of a recent report suggest that such exposure affects the developing brain in a manner similar to lead exposure. The main airborne chemicals implicated in the study are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), a constituent of particulate matter associated with soot, fuel combustion, vehicle exhaust, factory emissions and tobacco smoke. Camfil Farr, a specialist in molecular filtration, manufactures particle filters and activated carbon filters that can control soot and PAHs. An efficiency of MERV 11 or better particulate filter is recommended, as well as a broad-spectrum carbon filter for VOC and ozone removal, for installation in air handling systems. Camfil Farr’s CityCarb cartridge filters and CityFlo bag filters for urban pollution are combination particulate and molecular filters that exceed this specification.
C A M FI L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 2 7
Camfil Farr in the air filtration industry:
An unrivalled track record of growth and success The global Camfil Farr Group started out as a family business in the town of Trosa, Sweden, located about 70 km (42 miles) south of Stockholm. Camfil was founded in Trosa in 1963 by the Larson family, still one of the company’s principal owners, as a joint venture with Cambridge Filtration Corporation in the United States. In 1983, the family bought Cambridge’s shares. Camfil was wholly owned by the family until 2000, when Ratos AB, a Swedish private equity company, received 29.7 percent of the shares in connection with the acquisition of Farr in the United States. Camfil has always been profitable since the start of operations more than four decades ago. Today, the company is the global leader in clean air technology and air filter production, with operations in more than 50 countries. H ISTO R I CA L H I G H L I G H TS 1963 – Joint venture Founding of Camfil AB in Sweden as a joint venture with Cambridge (U.S.). 1966-1982 – Start of international expansion Establishment of subsidiaries in Germany (1966), Switzerland (1969), Denmark (1972), the Netherlands (1973), Belgium (1974), Italy (1975), France (1976), Finland (1979) and England (1982). 1983 – Wholly owned family business Camfil becomes independent after the Larson and Markman families acquire Cambridge’s stake. 1985-1999 – Acquisitions and more start-ups Acquisition of Allied Filters and Pumps, Ireland (1985), and Solfiltra, France, and Filtra, U.S. (1989); Start of Camfil Component AB, Sweden, and Camfil España, S.A., Spain (1995); Acquisition of Automet Filtration Ltd., U.K., and start of Camfil Air Filter SDN BHD, Malaysia (1997); Acquisition of Industrifilter, Sweden (1998) and Delcon Filtration Group, Inc., Canada (1999). 2000 – Entrance into the North American and Chinese markets Acquisition of Farr Co., United States; Start of Camfil Pty Ltd, Australia, Camfil Polska Sp.z.o.o., Poland, and opening of a Representative Office, Shanghai, China.
2006 – Formation of Power Systems organization Acquisition of IF Luftfilter in Sweden, Denmark and Finland, Australian Air Filters, Australia, and Kaefer Raco Engineering GmbH, Germany (integrated with Camfil Industrifilter, Sweden, and Camfil’s GT business in Canada, to form the new Power Systems unit); New production unit, U.K., and opening of a new sales office, Singapore (serving as regional HQ for Asia). 2007-2008 – Production expansion, new pan-Nordic organization and Asian manufacturing hub New production units in Slovakia and Shanghai; new sales subsidiaries in Japan and Taiwan for Clean Processes; complete integration of Swedish, Danish, Finnish and Norwegian units in a new pan-Nordic organization. Four plants combined in a single large facility in Malaysia to form new Asian manufacturing hub; Acquisition of Air Technology Ltd. and Total Air Care Ltd. in New Zealand, incorporated in Camfil NZ Ltd; Acquisition of Anfilco in India, with the formation of Camfil Farr Air Filtration India Ltd as a joint venture with the Anand Group. 2009 – Austrian acquisition, APC expansion, first sustainability report and new Nordic distribution centre Acquisition of Firma Mecke Klima GmbH (Austria); APC expands: APC Europe established, operating from Denmark, and APC Asia, based in Malaysia; new sales and logistic center opened in Ellwangen in south of Germany; Publication of filtration industry’s first sustainability report; Launch of Hi-Flo XL series of low-energy filters; New modern distribution and logistics centre opened in Trosa (Sweden) for Nordic region; Further consolidation of
2001-2005 – Additional expansion
manufacturing base for efficiency gains: in Sweden, Alingsås plant closed
Start of Camfil New Zealand and acquisition of Nordfilter, Sweden (2001);
and production moved to Trosa; in U.S., production of railroad products
Plant opened, Shanghai (2002); Two plants merged, Malaysia (2003); New
closed in Oklahoma and transferred to Washington facility.
sales company, Thailand, and opening of Representative Office, Russia. (2004); New production units started in Mexico and Brazil (2005).
Camfil Farr has opened a modern logistics centre in Trosa (Sweden) for the Nordic region to provide even better customer service. The new 3,300 square metre features a modern high-bay warehouse built with sustainable construction techniques: all 8,000 tonnes of blasted rock were reused at community sites and all excavated material was used in the building project, minimizing vehicle transports and emissions. The new building is heated by a local district heating plant fired with biomaterial. The centre’s ventilation system is also equipped with Camfil Farr filters and heat recovery to reduce power consumption.
Camfil Farr around the world Camfil Farr's headquarters, including functions such as Group Finance, Corporate Sourcing and Corporate Marketing, is based in Stockholm, Sweden. Central resources
AMERICAS
EUROPE
With six production units and seven
THE NORDIC REGION
branches in the U.S, two production units
The region's headquarters, as well as its
and four branches in Canada, Camfil Farr
main production site, are situated in Trosa,
provides excellent coverage of the entire
Sweden. An additional metal workshop is
North American through distributors and
located in Österbymo, Sweden. The sales
agents across the continent. Camfil Farr
force operates from more than 10 sales
also has a small production and sales com-
offices across Sweden. Camfil Farr also has
pany in Brazil to serve the South American
strong presence in other Nordic countries
market. With its broad product range, the
with well established sales companies in
company is an attractive partner for the
Finland, Denmark and Norway. The company
best distributors.
has 415 employees in the Nordic region.
for research and development are located in Trosa, south of Stockholm.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 30
NUMBERS OF
SALES IN
EMPLOYEES: 864
SEK MILLIONS: 1,046
• • • •
HEADQUARTERS P R O D U C T I O N U N I T, I N C L . S A L E S SALES OFFICE AGENT
A S I A - PA C I F I C The subsidiary in Singapore also serves as Camfil Farr’s regional headquarters in Asia. Camfil Farr’s production units in Malaysia and China specialize in high efficiency (HEPA) filters for the Clean Processes segment and also produce filters for ventilation systems in the Comfort Air segment. Camfil Farr also has subsidiaries in Thailand, Japan, Taiwan New Zealand, and Australia.
NUMBER OF
SALES IN
EMPLOYEES: 526
S E K M I L L I O N S : 319
CAMFIl
FA R R P O W E R S y S T E M S
The Power Systems segment, with 206 employees, has units operating in Sweden, Germany, Canada, China and India. The division provides air filtration solutions for the global power generation industry.
U.K. AND IRELAND
Germany, Switzerland, and Slovakia, Camfil
The Group has one production and sales
Farr also operates through companies in
company in the U.K. and one in Ireland. A
the Netherlands, Austria and Poland.
total of 239 employees work in the region.
in France, where Camfil Farr also has sev-
SALES IN
EMPLOYEES: 206
S E K M I L L I O N S : 719
OTHER MARKETS Through agents and distributors around the world, Camfil International AB serves all other markets where Camfil Farr does
SOUTHERN EUROPE Both plants in southern Europe are located
NUMBER OF
not have its own subsidiaries. Camfil NUMBER OF
SALES IN
EMPLOYEES: 1,560
SEK MILLIONS: 2,345
International AB is based in Trosa, Sweden.
eral local sales offices. Together with sales companies in Italy, Belgium and Spain, the region has 370 employees. CENTRAL EUROPE
NUMBER OF
SALES IN
EMPLOYEES: 12
S E K M I L L I O N S : 51
A total of 538 employees work in Central Europe. Besides production plants in
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 3 1
Financial Analysis 2009
eral sub-segments were severely hit by the world-wide decline in industrial production during 2009. Overall sales for Clean Processes decreased by 10% year-on-year, but with large variations within the seg-
Sales grow despite global
growth in this segment. In 2009, fore-
financial crisis
market market sales declined steeply since
The positive sales trend of the previous year
new construction was on a very low level.
continued in 2009, although it was mainly due to currency effects. The global financial crisis had a negative impact on some Camfil Farr markets and segments and Group sales in fixed currency decreased by 5%. Net sales in 2009 amounted to SEK 4,503 M (4,361), an increase of SEK 142 M, compared with 2008. Currency fluctuations had a positive impact of SEK 388 M, while fixed currency growth was SEK -246 M. Demand for Camfil Farr products was generally low throughout the year. Market segments that were affected the most by the financial crisis recovered slightly towards the end of the year. Sales in Europe remained on a stable level, decreasing 2% overall, but with deeper declines in some markets. The Group expanded its market share within Power Systems, despite an 8-percent decline in sales. After negative growth in Asia during 2008, Camfil Farr’s sales increased again, growing by 7%, especially in China. The financial crisis had the largest negative impact on the Group’s markets in the Americas, where the Comfort, APC and Railroad segments all showed double-digit
Service companies, which perform filter changes and service of ventilation systems, are Camfil Farr’s largest customers in this segment. Service companies represent a growing customer segment as outsourcing of facility management becomes an increasingly strong trend. Sales to service companies rose in Europe. Reducing the energy consumption of ventilation systems is a core sales argument for selecting Camfil Farr filter solutions for comfort air applications, which is in line with growing awareness of sustainability and energy conservation world-wide. Sales to the service sub-segment continued to increase by actively focusing on these arguments, and by continuously improving logistics and developing new software tools for e-commerce and LCC analysis for customer service. This has helped Camfil Farr gain a higher market share. The integration of Mecke Klima (Austria) contributed to stable Comfort Air sales in Europe. In North America, sales declined in the Comfort Air sector as overall market demand fell sharply. Camfil Farr is established as a supplier of quality filters and
declines in sales.
filtration solutions offering lower life cycle
Sales trend by business segment
benefitting from a growing need for better
costs and higher efficiency and sales are
Camfil Farr operates in four business seg-
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ), effective air filtration
ments: Comfort Air, Clean Processes, Safety
and the demand for a lower Total Cost of
& Protection and Power Systems (gas
Ownership for filtration systems. Success
turbine-related business).
factors for Camfil Farr in this business are
Comfort Air – the replacement business The Comfort Air segment is normally very stable since it does not fluctuate with business cycles in the same way as industrial sectors within Clean Processes. However, sales to Air Handling Unit (AHU) manufacturers and contractors, comprising initial
the North American organization’s work to develop new sales channels and especially Camfil Farr’s focus on reducing the energy consumption of HVAC systems, allowing customers to also lower their carbon emissions for a greener environmental footprint. Clean Processes – different business cycles within a heterogeneous segment
sales to suppliers of ventilation systems
ment. The sub-segments Microelectronics and Automotive continued to show negative sales growth, while sales in the subsegments Food & Beverage and Service Companies increased. The global sales and marketing organization has been successfully targeting these selected customer segments. As in the Comfort Air segment, sales to fore-market customers, such as OEMs and contractors, were the most negatively impacted. After strong growth in previous years, the North American market for Clean Processes decreased radically in 2009, as a result of the downturn in capital investments. In Asia, sales increased in several subsegments, such as Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals, but not enough to compensate for the continuing low activity in the microelectronics industry. Railroad sales in North America, which target the OEM market and depend on the production of new locomotives, decreased by almost 25% as the transport sector came to a standstill with thousands of locomotives taken out of service. Despite the economic climate, overall profitability of the segment remained strong. Safety & Protection Market activity within the nuclear power industry is rising in line with the worldwide focus on non-greenhouse-gas energy production. Several large projects are in the planning or construction phase for new plants and for fuel process and nuclear weapons disarmament. The containment business, focusing on safety labs for research and medical applications, increased both in Europe and the Americas and the market trend is positive. Combined nuclear and containment sales increased by more than 50% during 2009. Air Pollution Control, APC, sales have been growing rapidly over the past few
and AHUs, are normally an exception since
The Clean Processes segment is normally
years, but in 2009, the dust collector busi-
increased building activity tends to spur
more cyclical than Comfort Air and sev-
ness in North America decreased by more
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 32
than 20%, due to delays and cancelled
Market prices have been stable but price
interest rate in the loan portfolio decreased
capital investments. Camfil Farr continues
pressure is expected to be heavier in view
decreased from 4.6 percent to 3.3 percent
to focus on key fore-market segments and
of the slow economic recovery of certain
during the year, representing an decrease
market activity started to pick up during
markets.
of SEK 9 M in interest expense, calculated
the last quarter. In light of the market prospects and potential growth in APC, Camfil
on the loan portfolio at year-end 2009.
Operating profit
Farr has decided to expand its APC market
Operating profit of the Camfil Farr Group,
to Europe and Asia to offer customers a
after
complementary product range for dust
amounted to SEK 417 M in 2009 (400).
depreciation
and
amortization,
Cash flow and debt Net cash flow for the Group amounted to SEK 224 M (-113), including a debt reduc-
collection, initially in the manufacturing,
Operating profit in 2009 was charged
tion of SEK 161 M. Share acquisitions
pharmaceutical and mining industries. The
with restructuring costs of SEK 19 M (7)
totalled SEK 18 M and were related to
new European arm of the APC business
that were mainly related to the closure of
the acquisition of Mecke Klima in Austria.
launched activities in 2009 from a new
two production units and the completed
Working capital decreased by SEK 241 M,
focused APC subsidiary in Denmark that
transfer of production to Slovakia.
due to projects focusing on improvements
covers almost all European countries with
Underlying operating profit, excluding
in receivable and inventory management
local sales and support staff. The new
restructuring costs and items affecting
and somewhat lower sales volumes.
Asian APC unit is based in Malaysia.
comparability, was SEK 437 M (407), an
Interest-bearing net liabilities amounted to
increase of SEK 30 M, corresponding to an
SEK 410 M at year-end (789).
Power Systems
operating margin of 9.7 percent (9.3). Europe was the most profitable area
Capital investments
Camfil Farr Power Systems serves cus-
and margins improved slightly. Margins
Gross capital expenditures on tangible
tomers with mid-sized and large-size gas
in the Americas improved substantially in
and intangible assets, excluding goodwill,
turbines, and the addressable market is
spite of the decline in sales. The profitabil-
totalled SEK 163 M (188). in 2009. The
expanding as demand for energy continues
ity of Asian and Power Systems operations
main investments in 2009 were in the
to increase world-wide. The global Power
remained stable.
new warehouse in Trosa, Sweden and new
Systems business segment has operations in Americas, Asia and Europe. Camfil Farr
Restructuring to boost profitability
Power Systems’ business includes after-
In the U.S., the production unit in Oklahoma,
market sales of replacement filters on a
focused on Railroad products, was closed
global basis.
production lines in the U.S. for increasing productivity. Tax level
and production was relocated to other
The Group’s average tax level was 29.9%
The market has shown stable develop-
units. In Sweden, the production unit in
(30.0%). This was an effect of mix chang-
ment, but with large variations between the
Alingsås, incorporated in the Group as
es in profit generation from low to high
continents. Total sales in 2009 decreased
part of the IF Luftfilter group acquisition
tax countries such as the U.S., generally
by 8%, but the global market showed a
in 2006, was closed and production con-
lowered tax rates in many countries and
larger reduction and Camfil Farr’s market
centrated to the main unit in Trosa. A new
incentives related to recent investments.
share increased as a consequence, espe-
warehouse was built in Trosa to serve as a
cially in Asia. Business in the Americas and
logistics centre for the Nordic region and
Asia is showing strong growth.
further improve customer service.
Gross margin
Personnel The Camfil Farr Group had an average of
Production of labour-intensive Comfort
3,249 employees in 2009 (3,321). The
Air products has been relocated from
number of employees was reduced mainly
The gross margin increased to 38.4%
Germany to Slovakia. This move was final-
in the U.S., Canada and Sweden to adjust
(35.8%), mainly through the closure of two
ised during 2009 and the Slovak unit is
for lower production volumes. The only
production units, one in the U.S. and one in
expanding and adding new product lines.
area where staff increased was in Asia,
Sweden, in combination with staff reduc-
A new sales office and warehouse was
where the joint venture in India is expand-
tions to adjust to lower sales volumes.
opened in Ellwangen, southern Germany,
ing its activities for both Power Systems
More effective project execution within
to better serve the local market with short-
business and filter markets.
the Power Systems business segment
er lead-times for deliveries and improve
improved gross margins. In addition, the
customer service.
full-year effect of operating the new production facilities in Slovakia and China also had
Result from financial items
a positive impact on gross margin.
The result from financial items for the
The Group’s work to leverage its total
Group was SEK -41 M in 2009 (-44). Higher
purchasing power has continued to be
interest rates during the year were com-
successful.
pensated by decreased borrowings due to
PERSONNEl
W PRODUCTION
53%
W SALES
22%
W ADMINISTRATION AND WAREHOUSE
17%
W R&D, TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
8%
the strong cash flow. The Group’s average
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 3 3
CAMFIL AB
Swedish Corporate ID No. 556230-1266
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements Fo R t h e FISCAL y e AR JAn u ARy 1, 2009 – De Ce MBe R 31, 2009
B o a r d o f D i r e c t o r s ’ Re p o r t
Safet y & Protect ion Camfil Farr also manufactures and markets air filters to protect
I n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t C a m f i l Fa r r ’s o perations
the environment. Nuclear power stations and research laboratories are examples of application areas in this segment for Camfil Farr air filters and filtration systems. The Safety & Protection segment also includes dust collection systems to remove heavily
Camfil Farr is one of the leading groups in the air filtration market,
polluted and dust-laden air from industrial processes.
offering air filtration solutions to protect people (Comfort Air), production processes (Clean Processes), the environment (Safety
Business development
& Protection) and gas turbines (Power Systems). In 2009, Group sales totaled SEK 4,503 M (4,361) with 3,249 (3,321) employees.
Camfil Farr constantly develops its products, processes and
During the year, Comfort Air accounted for 45 (45) percent of the
human resources. Investments in R&D are made on a continuous
Group’s net sales, Clean Processes for 31 (32), percent, Power
basis mainly by the Parent Company in Sweden but also at the
Systems for 17 (17) percent and Safety & Protection for 7 (6)
Group’s primary production units.
percent.
Significant events occurring during t he Group’s business areas
t he fiscal year
Comfor t Air
Acquisit ions
To protect people from harmful particles in indoor air, Camfil Farr
During the year Camfil Farr acquired Mecke Klima GmbH (Austria).
offers air filtration solutions for air handling systems in housing,
The company, headquartered in Vienna, had been Camfil Farr’s
office buildings and hotels, among other facilities. Municipal,
distributor in Austria since 1965. In 2009, Mecke Klima had sales
county and government agencies are also important customers
of EUR 4 M. Consolidated goodwill totaling SEK 17 M has arisen in
for which Camfil Farr offers air filters for schools and hospitals,
connection with the acquisition.
among other public facilities. A substantial part of the market consists of replacement filters since filters in air handling systems
Product ion and logist ics
have to be changed at regular intervals.
The Alingsås plant was closed in Sweden in 2009. The facility’s production and warehouse operations were transferred to Trosa,
Clean Processes
where a new logistics and distribution center has been built.
The trend within most industrial manufacturing plants is to use
Structural costs for the move were charged in the amount of
increasingly automated production processes. Advanced produc-
SEK 8 M in the consolidated financial statements.
tion equipment and sensitive products require a clean indoor
The factory in Oklahoma was closed in 2009 in the U.S.
air environment to protect machinery, enhance product quality
The facility manufactured products for the Railroad segment
and boost the efficiency of product processes. This is a typical
and production has been transferred to other factories in North
requirement in the electronics, pharmaceutical and food process-
America. Other manufacturing operations were transferred during
ing industries, among others.
the year to further specialize North American production units. Restructuring costs in North America totaled SEK 5 M in 2009.
Power Systems
A new logistics center and sales office was established in
The Camfil Farr Power Systems business area offers air inlet
Ellwangen in the south of Germany. The new center will strengthen
systems, exhaust systems, acoustic enclosures, ventilation
Camfil Farr’s market position by offering customers shorter
systems and heavy-duty air filters for medium-size and large gas
delivery times and improved local support.
turbines to ensure high operating efficiency and reduce turbine wear-and-tear. The business area also offers a range of services,
Market developments
including upgrades and retrofits of existing systems and filter replacements.
Sales in the European market were on a relatively stable and high level during 2009 in spite of the economic recession that prevailed in most European countries. Sales as a whole declined by 2 percent in Europe in fixed currency. The OEM and automotive industries were hit harder by the financial crisis, while the replace-
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 34
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements
ment market, representing a large part of Camfil Farr’s market,
n et financials
was less sensitive to economic developments.
Net financials improved by SEK 3 M to SEK -41 M (-44). The
Sales in the North American market, which showed strong growth in 2008, declined in 2009. New product sales took the
improvement was due to lower interest rates in 2009, compared with 2008.
most severe hit since many projects were postponed or cancelled. Sales in the Railroad segment, where investments come late in the economic cycle, did not start to decline until the second half of the year. Overall sales in North America decreased by 14 percent, calculated in fixed currency. The Asian market was weighed down as a result of low industrial activity already in 2008, especially in the electronics industry, where the economic cycle changes relatively early. The region recovered in 2009 and Asian sales grew by 7 percent, calculated in fixed currency. Camfil Farr Power Systems develops and manufactures filtration and acoustic control systems for gas turbines. Sales in the segment, which have shown very strong growth over a longer period, declined by 5 percent, compared with the preceding year.
o perat ing results and posit ion
Profit af ter tax Group profit after tax increased by 6 percent to SEK 264 M (248), corresponding to 6 percent (6) of net sales. The Group’s tax rate was on the same level as last year at 30 percent. Current assets Current assets of the Group, excluding cash and cash equivalents, amounted to SEK 1,409 M (1,787). The decline in current assets was attributable to work in 2009 to reduce operating capital mainly in trade receivables and inventories, the timing of invoicing for projects in progress during the year and the lower sales volume in 2009. Current assets corresponded to 41 percent (41) of the Group’s annual sales. Borrowings
n et sales
The Group’s interest-bearing liabilities, including pension provi-
Net sales of the Camfil Farr Group totaled SEK 4,503 M (4,361),
sions, amounted to SEK 905 M (1,099) at year-end, of which SEK
an increase of SEK 142 M (3 percent), compared with the previ-
731 (911) comprised long-term loans. The average interest rate
ous year. Net sales were positively impacted by acquisitions and
on the Group’s interest-bearing loans was 3.3 percent (4.6) on
exchange rates, while the underlying volume of sales declined
December 31, 2009.
during the year.
Financial risk management
Change in net sales: 2009
2008
Since Camfil Farr’s operations are located primarily in countries
Structural changes (acquisitions)
0.6%
0.8%
outside Sweden, the Group is exposed to several different types
Currency changes
8.9%
0.6%
of financial risks. As a consequence, income, cash flow and equity
Price/mix and volume changes
-6.2%
4.6%
may vary from year to year, due to fluctuations in exchange rates
t otal
3.3%
6.0%
o perat ing income Operating income of the Camfil Farr Group totaled SEK 417 M (400). Restructuring costs related to the Group’s business plan amounted to SEK 19 M (8) and were charged against operating income. These costs consisted mainly of expenses for restructuring the production platform in Sweden, Germany and the United States. Eliminating structural costs, operating income was SEK 28 M higher than last year, of which the acquisition of Mecke
and interest rates. The risks are related to financial instruments, such as cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables, loans and derivative financial instruments. Risks related to these instruments are primarily: – Interest rate risks related to cash and cash equivalents and borrowings, – Financing risks related to the Group’s capital requirements, – Currency risks related to income and net investments in foreign subsidiaries, – Risks related to prices of raw materials and components that impact products manufactured for the Group, and – Credit risks attributable to financial and commercial activities.
Klima GmbH accounted for SEK 5 M. Adjusted for items affecting comparability, the operating margin was 9.7 percent (9.3). Depreciat ion Depreciation for the year totaled SEK 130 M (114).
The financial risk management function is centralized in the Finance Department of the Parent Company and its main task is to support operations and to identify and limit the Group’s financial risks in the most effective way possible, following a finance policy that is approved by the board of directors and updated each year.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 3 5
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements
Risks are managed by means of derivatives and other financial
Asia
instruments in accordance with limits set in the finance policy.
Sales in Asia increased by SEK 52 M to SEK 319 M (267).
For detailed information on the management of financial
Eliminating exchange rate effects, sales were SEK 22 M higher
items, see the following sections of this annual report: Accounting
in 2009. The increase in sales was attributable to the Group’s
policies (Notes 2 and 3), Financial risk management (Note 4),
Chinese subsidiary, which developed favorably during the last
Financial assets (Note 27), Derivative financial instruments (Note
quarter of 2009.
31) and Borrowings (Note 42).
The operating margin decreased from 9.1 percent to 7.3 percent.
Cash flow Cash flow in 2009 amounted to SEK 224 M, as against SEK -114 M
Gas turbines
last year. Cash flow from operating activities was SEK 407 M
The segment comprises the Group’s global sales of products and
higher than in 2008. This was primarily the effect of a major focus
systems to the gas turbine market (Power Systems), a business
on trade receivables and inventory management. Reduced sales
conducted from units in Sweden, Canada, Germany and India.
volumes within certain segments also affected cash flow. Adjusted
Segment sales totaled SEK 719 M (719). Eliminating exchange
for investments in companies during 2009, investments in fixed
rate effects, sales declined by SEK 38 M, due mainly to reduced
and intangible assets decreased by SEK 10 M. Cash and cash
demand during the year within the sub-sector for large gas
equivalents amounted to SEK 441 M (242) at year-end.
turbines.
Invest ments
7.4 percent (8.3).
The operating margin decreased by 0.9 percentage points to
Investments in property, plant and equipment totaled SEK 155 M (165). No individual major investments were made in facilities
o t her markets
during the year. Investments in property, plant and equipment
Other markets include companies selling through agents to
amounted to 3.4 percent (3.8) of net sales.
markets where Camfil Farr does not have its own subsidiaries, the Group’s production company in Brazil and a newly started
e quit y rat io and net debt-equit y rat io
company in Denmark that is the base for building business in the
The equity ratio was 53 percent (47) at year-end and the net debt-
dust collection segment (APC) in Europe. Sales in other markets
equity ratio decreased to 21 percent (43).
totaled SEK 73 M (72). Operating income decreased from SEK 3 M till SEK -10 M,
Developments by geographical segment Air filt rat ion: Europe In 2009, sales in Europe increased by SEK 109 M to SEK 2,345 M (2,236), or 5 percent. Sales increased as a result of the acquisition of Mecke Klima GmbH and a low exchange rate for the Swedish krona, among other factors. Eliminating exchange rate effects, underlying sales were 2 percent lower than in 2008. Operating income, as a percentage of sales, was 12.4
due mainly to start-up costs for the Danish company.
Incent ive programs Camfil has introduced several long-term incentive programs for senior executives in the company since 2000. The purpose is to offer programs linked to the value of the company in order to attract, retain and motivate senior executives. On December 31, 2009, the Group had one ongoing convertible debenture loan to 59 senior executives in a nominal value of SEK 51 M (Note 42).
percent (11.8).
Work of t he Board of Directors North America Sales in North America decreased by SEK 20 M to SEK 1,047 M (1,067). Adjusted for exchange rate effects, sales declined by SEK 170 M. Despite the lower sales volume, the operating margin increased by 2.2 percentage points to 11.7 percent (9.5) as a result of cost-saving measures, structural changes to production and differences in the mix of product sales in 2009.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 36
The overall task of Camfil Farr’s board of directors is to administer the Group’s business on behalf of the owners in such a way that the owners’ interest in receiving a sound long-term return on their capital is met in the best possible way. The board’s work is regulated by the Swedish Companies Act, the company’s Articles of Association and the formal work plan that the board has established for its work.
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements
The board decides on issues concerning the Group’s basic goals,
their comments and observations from their audit and their opin-
its strategic orientation and significant policies, as well as impor-
ion of the company’s internal control procedures.
tant questions concerning financing, investments, acquisitions and divestments. The board supervises and deals with monitoring and
e nvironmental impact
controlling the Group’s operations, the information issued by the Group and organizational matters.
Camfil Farr operates in a field where more efficient products, longer product life, lower energy consumption and a better indoor
Formal work plan The board develops a formal plan for its work each year. Guidelines for the board’s work, as well as instructions for del-
climate are all important components for sustainable development. e nerg y consumpt ion
egating work tasks between the board and the President, and
Ventilation accounts for up to 30 percent of the total energy costs
procedures for reporting to the board, are described in this formal
associated with modern office buildings. Camfil Farr has been
work plan. This plan covers, among other things, the basic tasks,
working with product Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Total Cost of
functions and responsibilities of the board, board work, board
Ownership (TCO) programs for filtration systems for a number of
meetings, and information and reporting requirements.
years. The energy consumption of a ventilation system is directly affected by a filter’s performance and pressure drop develop-
Board members and meet ings Camfil Farr’s board consists of seven members and three deputy members elected by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting, as well as one member and one deputy appointed by the largest trade union. No member of company management serves on the board. The board held six meetings in 2009. Remunerat ion Commit tee Under the management of the Chairman, the company’s board had a Remuneration Committee during 2009 to prepare and make proposals concerning the principles for compensation paid to the President and Executive Vice President. These proposals contain the goals for variable remuneration, the basis for calculating variable salary, basic salary, long-term incentives, and pension terms and conditions. Audit Commit tee The board also has an Audit Committee chaired by the Vice Chairman of the board. The committee’s main task is to assist the board in monitoring processes, internal control of financial reports and the auditing of financial statements. The Audit Committee consists of two board members, the Group’s Chief Financial Officer and the Group’s Financial Controller. In 2009, the committee held three meetings, of which all meetings were with the Group’s auditors. The Audit Committee examines the audited year-end financial statements, reviews the audit of the company’s administration and gives advanced approval of proposed auditing services and the costs for such services. To meet the board’s requirements for information, the company’s auditors participate in one board meeting per year to give
ment. The Group develops products and services to help customers reduce their energy consumption and environmental impact. Globally, Camfil Farr’s products and services can play an important role in the environmental sustainability of buildings by providing the optimum filter solution for every air handling unit and ventilation application. e nvironmental impact of operat ions Camfil Farr is also working on reducing its own direct environmental impact by decreasing the Group’s consumption of resources and energy. By carrying out LCA studies, Camfil Farr has identified the largest environmental impact of a filter – the energy it consumes over its life cycle. Compared with other industries, air filter production does not require large quantities of energy or water. However, the transport of relatively bulky filters consumes energy. Group The Camfil Farr Group has 23 production facilities, of which three in Sweden. The majority of the Group’s production units are required to report the quantity of consumed casting compounds and/or casting compound waste to regulatory agencies. Many of the production units in the United States also have permits covering process wastewater effluent and flue gas emissions. These operations impact the environment in the form of evaporative emissions and effluent. Camfil Farr applies and complies with local laws and regulations in all countries where the Group conducts operations. Several production units are certified to ISO 14001 and two more units were certified during 2009 – one in Switzerland and one in Malaysia. A program to benchmark energy savings has been implemented at all Group production units with a view to reducing their consumption of power, gas and heat. Major savings have
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 3 7
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements
been accomplished in the U.K. and France and their experience is
tion with the same pressure drop development as a 12-bag filter,
now being systematically applied at other production units in the
reducing raw material and resource consumption without affecting
Group.
performance. This has also resulted in lower transport volumes.
Sweden
by more efficient methods. Most company cars have been
In Sweden, manufacturing is conducted at three facilities: pro-
replaced with environmentally friendly vehicles.
In Österbymo, the oil-fired heating system has been replaced
duction of air filters and sheet-metal parts for filters in Trosa;
During the year, three Energy and Environment Conferences
production of metal filters in Österbymo and production of air
were arranged. More than 200 people attended the conferences,
intake, acoustic and enclosure systems for gas turbines in Borås.
which focused on life cycle costs and the total energy consump-
Production of filters for the Comfort Air sector was closed in
tion of ventilation systems, as well as the handling and disposal of
Alingsås during the year and transferred to Trosa.
used air filters. Videoconferencing systems have been introduced within the
The operations of the Trosa plant require a permit in accordance with Sweden’s environmental protection act, while the Borås
Group to reduce the number of business trips globally but also
facility is required to file an environmental report. The unit in
travel between local units in Sweden. The production units in Trosa and Österbymo are certified to
Österbymo is also required to file an environmental report. Production in Trosa has permits regulating effluent consisting
ISO 14000. ISO 9001 certification has been upgraded to version
of process wastewater, maximum permissible noise limits, the
9001-2008. A separate environmental report has been published
handling of environmentally hazardous liquids, and the production
for operations in Sweden. Operations requiring environmental permits account for about
of air filters using thermosetting plastics, such as isocyanate. The reporting requirement only concerns different types of casting
11 percent of Group sales, while activities requiring both permits
compounds, which can affect the environment by either evaporat-
and reporting represent approximately 18 percent of Group sales.
ing into the atmosphere or being discharged in wastewater. Rinse water is cleaned in a dedicated filtration system. An Environmental Report is filed with the County Administrative Board each year. During the year, part of the air handling system in Trosa was
Sustainabilit y Repor t In 2009, Camfil Farr became the first air filter manufacturer to publish a complete sustainability report. Camfil Farr has joined the UN’s Global Compact program and endorsed its ten principles.
replaced and a climate chamber was installed that utilizes the
Camfil Farr also follows the Global Reporting Initiative, which is a
latest ventilation and filtration technology. This system reduced
sustainability reporting framework.
energy consumption by an additional 13 percent in 2009. The closing of the Alingsås unit has reduced internal product
Future grow t h
shipments and improved logistics and product handling considerably. All sheet metal operations have been concentrated at the
The financial crisis and subsequent economic downturn affected
production unit in Österbymo, which provides the prerequisites
Camfil Farr’s operations in different ways in different countries,
for more efficient production and utilization of input goods and
depending on the country’s general economic development and
resources, and for reducing wastage and waste products.
the market segment that dominates local sales. Sales as a whole
A new distribution warehouse has been built in Trosa that
decreased by 5 percent in fixed currency in 2009. Growth is
reduces internal transports between facilities in Trosa. The new
expected to return to Camfil Farr’s normal figures during 2010.
warehouse also directly lowers energy usage and carbon dioxide
The market for Camfil Farr’s products is developing favorably at
emissions.
present because of several factors:
With the assistance of freight forwarding companies, new
•
attracting more and more attention and contributing to under-
transportation routes have been introduced for more direct ship-
lying market growth.
ments to the south of the country. This has reduced the load on forwarding centers in Stockholm and has sharply reduced driving
The health and environmental benefits of good air quality are
•
Industry, especially pharmaceutical, electronics and food pro-
distances to save the equivalent of 20,000 liters of diesel fuel per
ducers, are increasingly requiring higher and higher air quality
year. Order handling times and lead-times to customers have also
in their processes, which is creating a need for new air filtration solutions.
been shortened. Production was further retooled for the manufacture of the
•
Demand for energy is constantly increasing and benefitting
Hi-Flo XLT bag filter. This product uses 10 bags of filter media,
the operations of the Power Systems division serving the gas
which is the main material used in a bag filter, but achieves filtra-
turbine market.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 38
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements
Camfil Farr’s operations are well distributed geographically,
o wnership st ructure
which means there is less of a risk that the Group’s income will be affected if the economy of one country should decline. Since
On December 31, 2009, the company was owned by:
the aftermarket accounts for a large part of sales, Camfil Farr
is affected to a lesser extent by fluctuations in the more cyclical
Jan Eric Larson
market for air handling units and cleanroom facilities.
and family
Demand is expected to rise within a number of market seg-
and family
chemical filtration systems. Many projects have been postponed
Ratos AB
B-shares
500 000
2 465 000
500 000
1 960 000
1 035 000
Johan Markman
ments within Clean Processes, primarily for cleanrooms and
A-shares
1 540 000 422 414
2 956 896
but are expected to be resumed, which will benefit the Asian market
t otal number of shares
in particular. Demand in the automotive industry is expected to
Class A common shares carry 10 votes each and Class B common
remain weak. The large stimulus packages launched in a number
shares 1 vote each.
1 422 414
9 956 896
of countries will create a need for major expenditures to upgrade existing premises and investments in environmental technology. This will stimulate demand in a number of market segments to retrofit air handling systems in hospitals, for example. Replacement filter sales are relatively stable in the Comfort
Proposed disposit ion of earnings A total of SEK 1,136,481,621.58 in profits is available for distribution by the Annual General Meeting.
Air segment. OEM sales to air handling unit manufacturers for new installations fell drastically in 2009 as a consequence of
The Board of Directors and the President propose that the above
the decline in building construction. The new and lower level of
sum be distributed as follows:
demand is expected to continue during the coming year.
to the shareholders, a dividend of
A number of new production lines have been added at the manufacturing unit in Slovakia to meet the demand for low-cost production for the entire European market and for sales to the growing local market in Eastern Europe. The facility also assembles dust collection equipment for the new European division for APC systems, an area that is expected to expand during 2010. Camfil Farr’s program for continuous improvement – “The
SEK 7.50 per share balance to be carried forward t otal
85 344 825.00 1 051 136 796.58 1 136 481 621.58
The dividend will be paid on March 29, 2010. t he board’s statement about t he proposed dividend
Green Tornado” – is expected to generate additional efficiency
The proposed dividend to shareholders reduces the company’s
gains within production and logistics in North America and
equity ratio to 53 percent and the Group’s equity ratio to 52 per-
Europe.
cent. The equity ratio is acceptable against the background that
In Power Systems, the Power Systems division is now well
the operations of the company and Group can be continued with
equipped for the future as a result of internal programs to inte-
satisfactory profitability. The board estimates that liquid funds in
grate the business acquired in India, restructure the division,
the company and Group can be maintained on a similar adequate
procure common sub-suppliers and establish an engineering pool.
level.
A division for Power Systems has been established in China with
The company’s equity includes an unrealized capital gain of
the framework of the existing Camfil Farr subsidiary, providing a
SEK 6.0 M from the recognition of financial instruments at market
good platform for expansion in the local Chinese market. Camfil
value.
Farr can now offer solutions for several types of gas turbines and
Group contributions – which are subject to the approval of
markets, which will have a positive impact on the division’s sales.
the Annual General Meeting – have been paid in the amount of
Market growth is anticipated to remain strong over the next few
SEK 11.6 M. As a consequence, unrestricted equity on the balance
years and the aftermarket for replacement filters for gas turbines
sheet date, after taking into account the tax effect, was reduced
is therefore expected to grow further.
by SEK 8.5 M. Group contributions were also received in the
In summary, Camfil Farr estimates that the Group’s growth will be higher than market growth and that the operating margin will gradually improve further in the coming year.
amount of SEK 75.5 M. In the opinion of the board, the proposed dividend does not prevent the company and the other entities of the Group from fulfilling their obligations in the short and long term, or from carrying out necessary investments. The proposed dividend can thus be defended with regard to the Swedish Companies Act, Chapter 17, Section 3, paragraphs 2-3 (the principle of conservatism).
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 3 9
Consolidated Income Statement SEK M
n ote
Net sales Cost of goods sold
4 361.0
7, 18
-2 775.3
-2 806.3
1 727.5
1 554.7
Selling costs
o perating profit
2008
4 502.8
Gross profit
Administrative expenses
2009
6
8 7, 9, 10, 11, 12
-889.8
-786.4
-420.3
-368.1
417.4
400.2
Financial income
13, 18
84.1
67.3
Financial expenses
14, 18
-125.4
-111.1
376.1
356.4
-112.3
-108.6
263.8
247.8
Profit before income tax Income tax
17, 33
Profit for the year
Attributable to:
Owners of the Parent Company Minority interest
262.9
247.4
0.9
0.4
263.8
247.8
earnings per share attributable to the owners of the Parent Company during the year: (expressed in SEK per share) – Basic earnings per share
19
23.11
21.74
– Diluted earnings per share
19
22.70
21.44
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 40
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income SEK M
2009
2008
Profit for the year
263.8
247.8
o ther comprehensive income: Cash flow hedges Currency translation differences Tax attributable to other comprehensive income
5.2
-22.6
-95.5
214.0
-1.4
5.9
o ther comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
-91.7
197.3
t otal comprehensive income for the year
172.1
445.1
171.4
444.7
0.7
0.4
Attributable to: Owners of the Parent Company Minority interest
172.1
445.1
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 4 1
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position SEK M
ASSet S
n ote
2009-12-31
2008-12-31
n on-current assets Property, plant and equipment
24
Land and buildings
21
417.6
390.8
Machinery and production equipment
22
317.6
344.4
Equipment
23
73.8
106.9
809.0
842.1
886.7
905.1
Intangible assets
Goodwill
25
Other intangible assets
26
Financial assets Deferred tax assets Long-term receivables
8.8
8.1
895.5
913.2
27 33
61.0
66.1
27, 34
45.6
44.4
t otal non-current assets
106.6
110.5
1 811.1
1 865.8
Current assets Inventories, etc.
35
Raw materials and consumables
224.8
307.7
Finished products and goods for sale
220.2
239.5
Work on contract
138.5
157.7
583.5
704.9
939.0
Current receivables 30, 32
699.1
Bills receivable
Trade receivables
30
2.7
13.7
Derivative financial instruments
31
6.3
23.5
Income tax assets
28.3
31.8
Other receivables
64.1
41.3
25.9
32.8
Prepaid expenses and accrued income
36
826.4
1 082.1
41, 37
442.7
242.5
t otal current assets
1 852.5
2 029.5
3 663.6
Cash and cash equivalents
t o t AL ASSet S
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 42
3 895.3
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position SEK M
eQu It y An D LIABILIt IeS
n ote
2009-12-31
2008-12-31
equity Equity and reserves attributable to equity holders of the Parent Company Share capital
38
Other contributed equity Other reserves
39
Retained earnings
113.8
113.8
391.7
391.7
55.7
147.2
1 365.4
1 185.0
1 926.6
1 837.7
Minority interest
4.0
3.5
t otal equity
1 930.6
1 841.2
Liabilities Non-current liabilities
41, 42
Liabilities to credit institutions, interest-bearing
42
679.2
860.2
Convertible debenture loan, interest-bearing
42
51.4
50.5
Other non-current liabilities
46
18.2
13.6
Derivative financial instruments
31
16.2
24.3
Deferred income tax liabilities
33
49.0
67.2
Provisions for pensions and similar commitments
43
108.5
112.4
Other provisions
44
40.4
34.1
t otal non-current liabilities Current liabilities Liabilities to credit institutions
962.9
1 162.3
42 42
Trade payables
24.2
17.5
202.5
233.3
Bills payable
11.3
19.2
Current income tax liabilities
32.9
43.6
Other liabilities
46
186.4
234.8
Accrued expenses and deferred income
45
290.0
304.5
Derivative financial instruments
31
11.7
31.0
Other provisions
44
11.1
7.9
t otal current liabilities
770.1
891.8
t o t AL eQu It y An D LIABILIt IeS
3 663.6
3 895.3
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 4 3
Consolidated Statement of Changes in equity (n ote 38 and 39) SEK M
Attributable to owners of the Parent Company
o ther
Share
contributed
o ther
Retained
Minority
capital
equity
reserves
earnings
t otal
113.8
394.4
-50.1
1 039.7
1 497.8
interest
t otal equity
o pening balance at January 1, 2008
–
1 497.8
Comprehensive income Profit for the year
–
–
–
247.4
247.4
0.4
247.8
o ther comprehensive income Cash flow hedges, net of tax
–
–
-16.7
–
-16.7
–
-16.7
Currency translation differences
–
–
214.0
–
214.0
–
214.0
Total other comprehensive income
–
–
197.3
–
197.3
–
197.3
t otal comprehenisve income
–
–
197.3
t ransactions with owners Redemption of share warrants
–
-2.7
247.4
–
444.7
-23.6
0.4
445.1
-26.3
–
-26.3
Minority interest arising on business combination
–
–
–
–
–
3.1
3.1
Dividend
–
–
–
-78.5
-78.5
–
-78.5
t otal transactions with owners
–
-2.7
–
-102.1
-104.8
3.1
-101.7
113.8
391.7
147.2
1 185.0
1 837.7
3.5
1 841.2
113.8
391.7
147.2
1 185.0
1 837.7
3.5
1 841.2
Closing balance at December 31, 2008 o pening balance at January 1, 2009 Comprehensive income Profit for the year
–
–
–
262.9
262.9
0.9
263.8
o ther comprehensive income Cash flow hedges, net of tax
–
–
3.8
–
3.8
–
3.8
Currency translation differences
–
–
-95.3
–
-95.3
-0.2
-95.5
Total other comprehensive income
–
–
-91.5
–
-91.5
-0.2
-91.7
t otal comprehenisve income
–
–
-91.5
262.9
171.4
0.7
172.1
Dividend
–
–
–
-82.5
-82.5
-0.2
-82.7
t otal transactions with owners
–
–
–
-82.5
-82.5
-0.2
-82.7
113.8
391.7
55.7
1 365.4
1 926.6
4.0
1 930.6
t ransactions with owners
Closing balance at December 31, 2009
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 44
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows SEK M
n ote
2009
2008
o PeRAt In G ACt IVIt IeS 417.4
400.2
Depreciation
Income before financial items 10
129.5
113.9
Other items not affecting liquidity
48
10.3
-36.7
557.2
477.4
-45.9
-41.6
-135.3
-97.8
Interest paid Income tax paid Cash flow from operating activities before changes in operating capital
Decrease/Increase in inventories Decrease/Increase in trade receivables Decrease in other current receivables Decrease in trade payables
376.0
338.0
50.7
-0.5
230.5
-102.1
1.3
15.1
-33.2
-53.4
-8.0
13.0
Decrease/Increase in other current operating receivables n et cash generated from operating activities
617.3
In VeSt In G ACt IVIt IeS
210.1
Investments in property, plant and equipment and tangible assets
21, 22, 23, 26, 49
Investments in other financial assets Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
-155.0
-165.1
-9.3
-3.2
32.7
5.1
-18.3
-34.9
Divestments of other financial assets
0.5
6.2
Change in short-term investments
0.4
5.7
Investments in subsidiaries
49
Cash flow from investing activities
-149.0
FIn An CIn G ACt IVIt IeS
Redemption of share warrants Proceeds from borrowings Repayments of borrowings Dividends paid
20
-186.2
–
-26.3
331.1
1 546.2
-492.3
-1 578.9
-82.7
-78.5
Cash flow from financing activities
-243.9
-137.5
Cash flow for the year
224.4
-113.6
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
242.1
325.7
Currency translation difference in cash and cash equivalents Currency translation difference Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
-3.6
-6.3
-22.1
36.3
37
440.8
242.1
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 4 5
Parent Company Income Statement SEK M
n ote
2009 466.5
448.0
7, 18
-328.9
-334.8
137.6
113.2
Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Administrative expenses
-156.1
-136.1
Other operating income
12.8
14.6
Other operating expenses
-12.1
-9.9
o perating profit
8
2008
-17.8
7, 9, 10, 11, 12
-18.2
Result from financial investments Result from participations in Group companies
15
181.9
63.1
Interest income and similar items
13, 18
158.6
147.6
Interest expenses and similar items
14, 18
-148.1
-133.2
t otal result from financial investments
192.4
77.5
Profit after financial items
174.6
59.3
Appropriations
16
-4.6
-13.4
Tax on profit for the year
17
4.5
-1.8
Profit for the year
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 46
174.5
44.1
Parent Company Balance Sheet SEK M
ASSet S n on-current assets
n ote
2009-12-31
2008-12-31
Intangible assets Software
26
2.1
2.7
Machinery and production equipment
22
6.3
–
Equipment
23
5.6
5.6
11.9
5.6
Property, plant and equipment
Financial assets Shares in Group companies Receivables from Group companies Other non-current receivables
t otal non-current assets
27, 28
1 734.0
1 593.3
27
642.7
797.0
27, 34
0.3
0.3
2 377.0
2 390.6
2 391.0
2 398.9
Current assets Inventories, etc.
35
Raw materials and consumables Work on contract
0.0
1.2
14.9
3.0
14.9
4.2
Current receivables Receivables from Group companies Derivative financial instruments
31
Other receivables Prepaid expenses and accrued income
36
Cash and cash equivalents
371.8
458.1
11.0
33.0
–
3.4
1.0
41
2.4
383.8
496.9
275.1
118.3
t otal current assets
673.8
619.4
t o t AL ASSet S
3 064.8
3 018.3
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 4 7
Parent Company Balance Sheet SEK M
eQu It y An D LIABILIt IeS
n ote
2009-12-31
2008-12-31
equity Restricted equity Share capital
38
Statutory reserve Other restricted reserves
113.8
113.8
391.5
391.5
4.1
4.1
509.4
509.4
Retained earnings
962.0
948.9
Profit for the year
174.5
44.1
1 136.5
993.0
Unrestricted equity
t otal equity u ntaxed reserves Non-current liabilities Derivative financial instruments
40
1 502.4
47.4
42.8
16.2
24.3
672.0
850.6
51.4
50.5
41, 42 31
Liabilities to credit institutions, interest-bearing Convertible debenture loan, interest-bearing t otal non-current liabilities
1 645.9
739.6
925.4
Current liabilities Trade payables Liabilities to subsidiaries Derivative financial instruments
31, 42
Income tax liabilities Other liabilities Accrued expenses and deferred income
45
26.9
28.8
562.6
435.5
15.9
45.9
-
5.2
3.0
2.6
23.5
29.7
t otal current liabilities
631.9
547.7
t o t AL eQu It y An D LIABILIt IeS
3 064.8
3 018.3
Pledged assets
46
None
None
Contingent liabilities
47
215.7
195.8
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 48
Parent Company Statement of Changes in equity SEK M
equity at January 1, 2008
Share
Statutory
o ther restricted
Retained
capital
reserve
reserves
earnings
113.8
391.5
6.8
1 007.8
Group contributions received
101.8
Group contributions paid
-16.3
Tax on Group contributions
-23.9
Redemption of share warrants
-2.7
Hedging reserve
-23.6 -24.9
Tax on hedging reserve
6.5
Dividend
-78.5
Profit for the year
44.1
equity at January 1, 2009
113.8
391.5
4.1
993.0
Group contributions received
75.5
Group contributions paid
-11.6
Tax on Group contributions
-16.8
Hedging reserve
6.0
Tax on hedging reserve
-1.6
Dividend
-82.5
Profit for the year
174.5
equity at December 31, 2009
113.8
391.5
4.1
1 136.5
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 4 9
Parent Company Statement of Cash Flows SEK M
n ote
2009
o PeRAt In G ACt IVIt IeS Income before financial items
-17.8
2008 -18.2
Depreciation
10
4.2
2.3
Other items not affecting liquidity
48
4.4
-24.8
-9.2
-40.7
51.5
66.3
Interest received Dividends received
181.9
78.1
Interest paid
-88.9
-81.8
Income tax paid
-17.7
-20.5
Cash flow from operating activities before changes in operating capital
Increase/Decrease in inventories Decrease/Increase in current receivables Decrease/Increase in trade payables Increase in other current operating receivables n et cash generated from operating activities
117.6
1.4
-10.6
13.4
100.5
-70.1
-1.8
7.4
95.6
102.1
301.3
54.2
In VeSt In G ACt IVIt IeS Investments in intangible assets
26
-0.3
22, 23
-9.5
-2.5
27
-140.8
-284.9
Divestments/Repayments of other financial assets
154.3
149.1
Change in short-term investments
110.8
84.7
114.5
-56.8
Investments in property. plant and equipment Investments in other financial assets
n et cash used in investing activities
-3.2
FIn An CIn G ACt IVIt IeS Redemption of share warrants Group contributions received
–
-26.3
69.2
61.9
Proceeds from borrowings
325.0
1 544.2
Repayments of borrowings
-569.6
-1 569.9
Decrease in short-term financial liabilities Dividends paid
20
–
-17.2
-82.5
-78.5
n et cash used in financing activities
-257.9
-85.8
Cash flows for the year
157.9
-88.4
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
118.3
212.0
Currency translation difference in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 50
-1.1
-5.3
37
275.1
118.3
t he Camfil Farr Group has more than 3,300 employees world-wide
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 5 1
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 1.
General information
53
n ote 27. Financial assets
70
n ote 2.
Accounting policies of the Parent Company
53
n ote 28. Shares in subsidiaries
71
n ote 3.
Accounting policies of the Group
54
n ote 29. Financial instruments by category
71
n ote 4.
Financial risk management
60
n ote 30. Credit quality of financial assets
72
n ote 5.
Critical judgments in applying the entity’s accounting policies
n ote 31. Derivative financial instruments
72
63 n ote 32. Trade and other receivables
73
n ote 6.
Net sales and operating profit by geographical segment
63
n ote 33. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities
73
n ote 7.
Expenses by nature
64
n ote 34. Non-current receivables
75
n ote 8.
Compensation paid to auditors
65
n ote 35. Inventories and work on contract
75
n ote 9.
Employee remuneration
65
n ote 36. Prepaid expenses and accrued income
75
n ote 10. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
66
n ote 37. Cash and cash equivalents
75
n ote 11. Research and development costs
66
n ote 38. Share capital
75
n ote 12. Operating leases
66
n ote 39. Other reserves
75
n ote 13. Financial income/Interest income and similar items
n ote 40. Untaxed reserves
75
66 n ote 41. Bank overdraft facilities
75
n ote 14. Financial costs/Interest expenses and similar items
67
n ote 42. Borrowings
75
n ote 15. Result from participations in Group companies
67
n ote 43. Provisions for pensions and similar obligations
77
n ote 16. Appropriations
67 n ote 44. Other provisions
78
n ote 17. Income tax/Tax on profit for the year
67 n ote 45. Accrued expenses and deferred income
79
n ote 18. Net foreign exchange gains/losses
67 n ote 46. Pledged assets
79
n ote 19. Earnings per share
68 n ote 47. Contingent liabilities
79
n ote 20. Dividend per share
68 n ote 48. Adjustments for items not included in cash flow
79
n ote 21. Land and buildings
68 n ote 49. Acquisitions
79
n ote 22. Machinery and production equipment
68 n ote 50. Related party transactions
80
n ote 23. Equipment
69 n ote 51. Events after the balance sheet date
81
n ote 24. Finance leases
69 n ote 52. Exchange rates
81
n ote 25. Goodwill
69 n ote 53. Definitions of key ratios
81
n ote 26. Other intangible assets
70
All amounts in SEK millions unless specified otherwise. Figures in parentheses refer to the preceding year. The notes on pages 53 to 81 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 52
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 1. General information
Shares and par t icipat ions in subsidiaries
Camfil Farr manufactures and sells air filters through 36 companies and
Shares and participations in subsidiaries are recognized at acquisition cost
approximately 50 agents in some 50 countries. The Group has a total of 49 companies. Camfil Farr also has a well-established sales network with approximately 100 distributors in mainly the United States and Canada. The Group has production facilities all over the world and sells mainly products in Europe, North America and Asia. The Parent Company is a limited liability company incorporated and with registered office in Trosa, Sweden. The address of the head office is Sveavägen 56 E, SE-111 34 Stockholm, Sweden. The Board of Directors approved the publication of this Annual Report on March 19, 2010.
after deduction for any impairment. Dividends received are recognized as financial income. If dividends exceed a subsidiary’s comprehensive income for the period, or result in the booked value of the holding’s net assets being less than the book value of the participations in the consolidated financial statements, there is an indication for a need for impairment. When there is an indication that shares and participations in subsidiaries have declined in value, the recoverable amount is assessed. If it is lower than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. The impairment loss is recognized in the item “Result from participations in Group companies”.
n ote 2. Accounting policies of the Parent Company
Proper t y, plant and equipment
Below is a description of the most significant accounting policies for the
Fixed assets owned by the company
Parent Company that were applied in the preparation of this Annual Report.
In the Parent Company, property, plant and equipment is recognized at
These principles have been consistently applied for all presented years,
acquisition cost after deduction for accumulated depreciation and any
unless specified otherwise.
impairment losses in the same way as for the Group but with the addition
The financial statements of the Parent Company have been prepared in
of any revaluations.
accordance with the Swedish Annual Accounts Act (1995:1554) and standard “RFR 2.2 Accounting for Legal Entities” issued by the Swedish Financial
Fixed assets leased by the company
Reporting Board. In RFR 2.2, the Parent Company, in its financial statements
In the Parent Company, all leasing contracts are recognized in accordance
for the legal entity, shall apply all International Financial Reporting Standards
with the regulations for operating leases.
(IFRS) and interpretations approved by the EU to the greatest extent possible within the framework of the Swedish Annual Accounts Act and taking into
Borrowing costs
account the relationship between accounting and taxation. The recommenda-
In the Parent Company, borrowing costs are charged against income for the
tion states the exceptions and supplementary accounting principles that are
period they refer to.
to be applied from IFRS. The differences between the accounting policies of the Group and Parent Company are described below.
Intangible assets
Revenue recognit ion
Research and development costs In the Parent Company, all expenses for development are recognized as
Sales of goods and provision of service assignments
costs in the income statement.
The Parent Company recognizes revenues from service assignments, when an assignment is completed, in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 4 of the Swedish Annual Accounts. Until the assignment is completed, it is reported
e mployee benefits
as work on contract at the lower of acquisition cost and net sales cost on
Defined benefit plans
the balance sheet date.
In the Parent Company, the calculation of defined benefit plans is based on other principles that those stated in IAS 19. The Parent Company follows
Dividends
the regulations of the Swedish law on safeguarding pension obligations (“Tryggandelagen”) and the instructions of the Swedish Financial Supervisory
Dividend income is recognized when the right to receive payment is
Authority (“Finansinspektionen”) since such plans are a prerequisite for being
considered certain.
entitled to tax deductions. The main differences, compared with the rules in IAS 19, is the way the discount rate is set; the calculation of the defined
Financial ins t ruments The Parent Company does not apply the recognition regulations in IAS 39. However, what is otherwise written about financial instruments also applies to the Parent Company. In the Parent Company, financial assets are recognized at cost less any impairment losses and financial current assets are recognized at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
benefit obligation is based on the present salary level without assumptions for future salary raises, and that all actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the income statement as they arise. The Parent Company recognizes defined benefit pension plans in accordance with “FAR SRS Red R4, Recommendation No. 4, Accounting of pension provisions and pension costs” issued by FAR SRS, the institute for the accounting profession in Sweden. The Parent Company has undertaken defined benefit obligations for salaried workers that are secured through
Derivat ives and hedge account ing Derivatives that are not used for hedging purposes are recognized in the Parent Company at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The recognition of derivatives that are used for hedging depends on the hedged item,
insurance with Collectum and are recognized as a defined contribution plan. The interest portion on the change in pension cost for the year is recognized as financial costs. Other pension costs are charged against operating income.
in which case the derivative is treated as an off-balance item as long as the hedged item is not recognized in the balance sheet at acquisition cost. When the hedged item is recognized in the balance sheet, the derivative is recognized in the balance sheet at fair value.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 5 3
n otes to the Financial Statements
t a xes
ment of changes in equity, requiring “non-owner changes in equity” to be presented separately from owner changes in equity in a statement of
In the Parent Company, untaxed reserves are recognized, including deferred
comprehensive income. As a result, the Group presents in the consolidat-
income tax liabilities. However, in the consolidated accounts, untaxed
ed statement of changes in equity all owner changes in equity, whereas
reserves are divided into deferred income tax liabilities and equity.
all non-owner changes in equity are presented in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Comparative information has been
Group cont ribut ions
re-presented so that it also is in conformity with the revised standard. As the change in accounting policy only impacts presentation aspects, there
The company recognizes group contributions in accordance with the state-
is no impact on earnings per share.
ment “UFR 2 Group Contributions and Shareholders’ Contributions” issued by the Swedish Financial Reporting Board. Group contributions are recognized
• IFRS 2 (amendment), “Share-based payment” (effective January 1, 2009)
on the basis of their economic significance in which Group contributions that
deals with vesting conditions and cancellations. It clarifies that vesting
are paid to minimize the Group’s total tax are recognized directly in retained
conditions are service conditions and performance conditions only. Other
earnings after deduction for their present tax effect.
features of a share-based payment are not vesting conditions. These
Group contributions that are comparable to dividends are recognized as
features would need to be included in the grant date fair value for trans-
dividends in which Group contributions received and their present tax effect
actions with employees and others providing similar services; they would
are recognized in the income statement. Group contributions paid and their
not impact the number of awards expected to vest or valuation thereof
present tax effect are charged directly against retained earnings.
subsequent to grant date. All cancellations, whether by the entity or by other parties, should receive the same accounting treatment. The Group
Financial risk management
and company have adopted IFRS 2 (amendment) from January 1, 2009. The amendment does not have a material impact on the Group’s financial
A common financial risk management framework is used for all units in the
statements.
Group. The description in Note 4 is therefore also applicable in all essentials to the Parent Company.
(b) Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the Group
n ote 3. Accounting policies of the Group
The following standards and amendments to existing standards have been
Below is a description of the most significant accounting policies for the
on or after January 1, 2010 or later periods, but the Group has not early
Group that were applied in the preparation of this Annual Report. These poli-
adopted them:
published and are mandatory for the Group’s accounting periods beginning
cies have been consistently applied for all presented years, unless specified otherwise.
• IFRIC 17, “Distribution of non-cash assets to owners” (effective on or after July 1, 2009). The interpretation is part of the IASB’s annual
3.1 Basis of preparat ion
improvements project published in April 2009. This interpretation provides guidance on accounting for arrangements whereby an entity distrib-
The consolidated financial statements of the Camfil AB Group have been
utes non-cash assets to shareholders either as a distribution of reserves
generally prepared in accordance with the Swedish Annual Accounts Act
or as dividends. IFRS 5 has also been amended to require that assets are
and “RFR 1.2 Supplementary Accounting Regulations for Groups” and
classified as held for distribution only when they are available for distribu-
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU.
tion in their present condition and the distribution is highly probable. The
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by applying the
Group will apply IFRIC 17 from January 1, 2010. It is not expected to have
cost method except for revaluations of available-for-sale financial assets and
a material impact on the Group’s financial statements.
financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) valued at fair value through profit or loss. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires
• IAS 27 (revised), “Consolidated and separate financial statements” (effective from July 1, 2009). The revised standard requires the effects of all
the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management
transactions with non-controlling interests to be recorded in equity if
to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the company’s account-
there is no change in control and these transactions will no longer result
ing policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity,
in goodwill or gains and losses. The standard also specifies the account-
or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consoli-
ing when control is lost. Any remaining interest in the entity is remeas-
dated financial statements, are disclosed in Note 5.
ured to fair value, and a gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss. The Group will apply IAS 27 (revised) prospectively to transactions with non-
(a) New and amended standards adopted by the Group
controlling interests from January 1, 2010.
The Group has adopted the following new and amended IFRSs as of January 1, 2009: • IFRS 7, “Financial instruments – Disclosures” (amendment) – effective
• IFRS 3 (revised), “Business combinations” (effective from July 1, 2009). The revised standard continues to apply the acquisition method to
January 1, 2009. The amendment requires enhanced disclosures about
business combinations, with some significant changes. For example,
fair value measurement and liquidity risk. In particular, the amendment
all payments to purchase a business are to be recorded at fair value at
requires disclosure of fair value measurements by level of a fair value
the acquisition date, with contingent payments classified as debt subse-
measurement hierarchy. As the change in accounting policy only results
quently re-measured through the income statement. There is a choice on
in additional disclosures, there is no impact on earnings per share.
an acquisition-by-acquisition basis to measure the non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportion-
• IAS 1 (revised), “Presentation of financial statements” – effective January
ate share of the acquiree’s net assets. All acquisition-related costs should
1, 2009. The revised standard prohibits the presentation of items of
be expensed. The Group will apply IFRS 3 (revised) prospectively to all
income and expenses (that is, “non-owner changes in equity”) in the state-
business combinations from January 1, 2010.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 54
n otes to the Financial Statements
• IAS 38 (amendment), “Intangible Assets”. The amendment is part of the IASB’s annual improvements project published in April 2009 and the Group will apply IAS 38 (amendment) from the date IFRS 3 (revised) is
subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognized directly in the income statement. Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transac-
adopted. The amendment clarifies guidance in measuring the fair value of
tions between Group companies are eliminated. Accounting policies of
an intangible asset acquired in a business combination and it permits the
subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with
grouping of intangible assets as a single asset if each asset has similar
the policies adopted by the Group.
useful economic lives. The amendment will not result in a material impact on the Group’s financial statements.
Transactions with minority interests The Group applies a policy of treating transactions with minority interests as
• IFRS 5 (amendment), “Measurement of non-current assets (or disposal
transactions with parties external to the Group. Disposals to minority inter-
groups) classified as held-for-sale”. The amendment is part of the IASB’s
ests result in gains and losses for the Group and are recorded in the income
annual improvements project published in April 2009. The amendment
statement. Purchases from minority interests result in goodwill, which is the
provides clarification that IFRS 5 specifies the disclosures required in
difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired
respect of non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for
of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary. Disposals to minority
sale or discontinued operations. It also clarifies that the general require-
interests, in which the consideration received differs from the carrying value
ments of IAS 1 still apply, particularly paragraph 15 (to achieve a fair pres-
of the net assets that are being disposed of, result in gains or losses which
entation) and paragraph 125 (sources of estimation uncertainty) of IAS 1.
are recognized in the income statement.
The Group will apply IFRS 5 (amendment) from January 1, 2010. It is not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements. • IAS 1 (amendment), “Presentation of financial statements”. The amend-
3.3 Segment repor t ing Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal
ment is part of the IASB’s annual improvements project published in April
reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operat-
2009. The amendment provides clarification that the potential settlement
ing decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assess-
of a liability by the issue of equity is not relevant to its classification as
ing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the
current or non-current. By amending the definition of current liability, the
steering committee that makes strategic decisions.
amendment permits a liability to be classified as non-current (provided that the entity has an unconditional right to defer settlement by transfer
3.4 Foreign currency t ranslat ion
of cash or other assets for at least 12 months after the accounting period) notwithstanding the fact that the entity could be required by the
Functional and presentation currency
counterparty to settle in shares at any time. The Group will apply IAS 1
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are
(amendment) from January 1, 2010. It is not expected to have a material
measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which
impact on the Group or company’s financial statements.
the entity operates (“the functional currency”). The consolidated financial statements are presented in SEK, which is the Parent Company’s functional
• IFRS 2 (amendments), “Group cash-settled and share-based payment
and presentation currency.
transactions”. In addition to incorporating IFRIC 8, “Scope of IFRS 2”, and IFRIC 11, “IFRS 2 – Group and treasury share transactions”, the amend-
Transactions and balances
ments expand on the guidance in IFRIC 11 to address the classification
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency
of Group arrangements that were not covered by that interpretation. The
using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or
new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s
valuation where items are remeasured. Foreign exchange gains and losses
financial statements.
resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated
3.2 Consolidat ion
in foreign currencies are recognized in the income statement. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the translation of trade receivables
Subsidiaries
and trade payables are recognized in cost of goods sold, while the transla-
Subsidiaries are all entities (including special-purpose entities) over which
tion effects of other financial assets and liabilities are recognized in financial
the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies
income and expenses, except when the transactions are deferred in equity
generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of the voting
as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges.
rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the
Group companies
Group controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the
The results and financial position of all the Group’s entities (none of which
date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated
has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy as its functional currency)
from the date that control ceases.
that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable
translated into the presentation currency as follows: • assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet; • income and expenses for each income statement are translated at aver-
to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent
age exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approxima-
liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their
tion of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction
fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minor-
dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the dates
ity interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the
of the transactions); and • all resulting exchange differences are recognized as a separate com ponent of equity.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 5 5
n otes to the Financial Statements
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the
3.6 Intangible assets
net investment in foreign entities, and of borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to share-
Goodwill
holders’ equity. When a foreign operation is partially disposed of or sold,
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair
exchange differences that were recorded in equity are recognized in the
value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired
income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale.
subsidiary/associate at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisitions
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a
of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets. Goodwill on acquisitions of
foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and
associates is included in investments in associates. Goodwill is tested annu-
translated at the closing rate.
ally for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the
3.5 Proper t y, plant and equipment
entity sold. Land and buildings comprise mainly factories and offices. Property, plant
Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impair-
and equipment are stated at acquisition cost less depreciation. The acquisi-
ment testing. The allocation is made to those cash-generating units or
tion cost includes costs that can be directly attributable to the acquisition of
groups of cash-generating units, in accordance with the Group’s operating
the asset. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or
segments, which are expected to benefit from the business combination in
recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that
which the goodwill arose.
future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and main-
Acquired computer software
tenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in
Standard computer software is normally expensed. Costs for software devel-
which they are incurred.
oped by the company, or software that has been modified considerably for
Depreciation on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
the Group’s use, as well as standard software of major value, are capitalized
is calculated using the straight-line method over their estimated utilization
and amortized over three years using the straight-line method. In the income
period. The following depreciation periods are applied:
statement, depreciation of software is included in the item “Cost of goods sold”, or in “Selling costs” or “Administrative expenses”, depending on the
Buildings Land improvements
25 years As per local tax regulations
application. Costs associated with maintaining software are recognized as an expense as incurred.
Machinery and production equipment
8 years
Equipment
8 years
Research and development work
Computers
3 years
Research expenditure is recognized as an expense as incurred. Costs
Fork-lift trucks and vehicles
4 years
incurred in development projects (relating to the design and testing of new or improved products) are recognized as intangible assets when it is
Land is not depreciated.
probable that the project will be a success considering its commercial and technological feasibility, and costs can be measured reliably. Other develop-
The residual value of assets and utilization period are tested for impairment
ment expenditures are recognized as an expense as incurred. Development
on each balance sheet date and adjusted if needed.
costs that have been recognized earlier as a cost are not recognized in the
An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recover-
following period. Development costs with a finite useful life that have been
able amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated
capitalized are amortized from the commencement of the commercial pro-
recoverable amount.
duction of the product on a straight-line basis over the period of its expected
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds
benefit, not exceeding five years.
with the carrying amount, which are included in the income statement. When revalued assets are sold, the amounts included in other reserves are trans-
3.7 Impairment of non-financial assets
ferred to retained earnings. Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortization and Financial leases
are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortization
Leases of property, plant and equipment where the Group has substantially
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases.
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment
Finance leases are capitalized at the lease’s inception at the lower of the
loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount
fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease
exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of
payments.
an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes
Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance balance outstanding.
of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units).
The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in “Other non-current liabilities”. The interest element of the finance cost is
3.8 Financial assets
charged to the income statement over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability
The Group classifies its financial assets in the following categories: at fair
for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance
value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, and derivative financial
leases is depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the
instruments used for hedging purposes. The classification depends on the
lease term.
purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 56
n otes to the Financial Statements
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired princip-
• The disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties; or • Observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the
ally for the purpose of selling in the short-term. Derivatives are also catego-
estimated future cash flows from a portfolio of financial assets since the
rized as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in
initial recognition of those assets, although the decrease cannot yet be
this category are classified as current assets and are included in derivative
identified with the individual financial assets in the portfolio, including:
instruments.
(i) Adverse changes in the payment status of borrowers in the
Loans and receivables
(ii) National or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults on
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or
the assets in the portfolio.
port folio; and
determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivables are included in current assets, except maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current
The Group first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists. The amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the
assets. The Group’s loans and receivables are classified as trade receiv-
asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash
ables (Note 32), non-current receivables (Note 27 and Note 34), and as cash
flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted
and cash equivalents in the balance sheet.
at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. The asset’s carrying amount of the asset is reduced and the amount of the loss is recognized in
Recognition and measurement
the consolidated income statement. If a loan or held-to-maturity investment
Purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade date –
has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment
the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Financial
loss is the current effective interest rate determined under the contract. As
instruments are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs for all
a practical expedient, the Group may measure impairment on the basis of an
financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss.
instrument’s fair value using an observable market price.
Financial assets recognized at fair value through profit or loss are
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases
initially recognized at fair value, while related transaction costs are recog-
and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the
nized in the income statement. Financial assets are derecognized when the
impairment was recognized (such as an improvement in the debtor’s credit
rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been
rating), the reversal of the previously recognized impairment loss is recog-
transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards
nized in the consolidated income statement.
of ownership. Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans
3.9 Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities
and receivables are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the “financial
Derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured
assets at fair value through profit or loss” category are included in the
at their fair value. The method of recognizing the resulting gain or loss
income statement in the period in which they arise.
depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument,
The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired.
and if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Group designates certain derivatives as either:
Impairment losses recognized in the income statement on equity instruments are not reversed through the income statement. Impairment testing
(a) hedges of the fair value of recognized liabilities (fair value hedge) or
of trade receivables is described in section 3.11.
(b) hedges of a particular risk associated with a recognized liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (cash flow hedge).
Impairment of financial assets Assets carried at amortized cost:
The Group documents, at the inception of the transaction, the relationship
The Group assesses at the end of each reporting period whether there
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk manage-
is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is
ment objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The
impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired and
Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an
impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impair-
ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transac-
ment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recog-
tions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of
nition of the asset (a “loss event”) and that loss event (or events) has an
hedged items.
impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. The criteria that the Group uses to determine that there is objective
The fair values of various derivative instruments used for hedging purposes are disclosed in Note 31. Movements on the hedging reserve in shareholders’ equity are shown in Note 39. The full fair value of a hedging
evidence of an impairment loss include:
derivative is classified as a current asset or long-term liability when the
• Significant financial difficulty of the issuer or obligor;
remaining maturity of the hedged item is more than 12 months; it is classi-
• A breach of contract, such as a default or delinquency in interest or
fied as a current asset or current liability when the remaining maturity of the
principal payments; • The Group, for economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower’s
hedged item is less than 12 months. Trading derivatives are classified as a current asset or liability.
financial difficulty, granting to the borrower a concession that the lender would not otherwise consider; • It becomes probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization;
Fair value hedge Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 5 7
n otes to the Financial Statements
If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the adjust-
to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables.
ment to the carrying amount of a hedged item, for which the effective inter-
Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will
est method is used, is amortized to profit or loss over the period to maturity.
enter bankruptcy or financial reorganization, and default or delinquency in
The Group only applies fair value hedge accounting for hedging fixed interest
payments (more than 30 days overdue) are considered indicators that the
risk on borrowings. The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of inter-
trade receivable is impaired. The amount of the provision is the difference
est rate swaps hedging fixed rate borrowings is recognized in the income
between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated
statement within “Financial expenses”. Changes in the fair value of the hedge
future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate.
fixed rate borrowings attributable to interest rate risk are recognized in the income statement within “Financial expenses”.
The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account, and the amount of the loss is recognized in the income statement within “selling costs”. When a trade receivable is uncollectible, it is
Cash flow hedge
written off against the allowance account for trade receivables. Subsequent
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are des-
recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against “selling
ignated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehen-
costs” in the income statement.
sive income. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the income statement within “cost of goods sold” (forward
3.12 Cash and cash equivalents
foreign exchange contracts) or within “financial items” (interest rate swaps). Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled in the income statement in
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with
the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss (for example, when
banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities
the forecast sale that is hedged takes place). The gain or loss relating to the
of three months or less from the date of the acquisition.
effective portion of interest rate swaps hedging variable rate borrowings is recognized in the income statement within “financial expenses”. The gain or
3.13 Borrowings
loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized in the income statement within “costs of goods sold”. However, when the forecast transaction that
Borrowings are recognized initially at fair value, net of transaction costs
is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset (for example,
incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated at amortized cost; any differ-
inventory) or a liability, the gains and losses previously deferred in equity are
ence between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption
transferred from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost
value is recognized in the income statement over the period of the borrow-
of the asset or liability.
ings using the effective interest method.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no
Compound financial instruments issued by the Group comprise convert-
longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss
ible notes that can be converted to share capital at the option of the holder,
existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognized when the
and the number of shares to be issued does not vary with changes in their
forecast transaction is ultimately recognized in the income statement. When
fair value.
a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain
The fair value of the liability portion of a convertible bond is determined
or loss that was reported in equity is immediately transferred to the income
using a market interest rate for an equivalent non-convertible bond. This
statement within “cost of goods sold”.
amount is recorded as a liability on an amortized cost basis until extinguished on conversion or maturity of the bonds. The remainder of the pro-
Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting
ceeds is allocated to the conversion option. This is recognized and included
Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes
in shareholders’ equity, net of income tax effects. Subsequent to initial
in the fair value of any derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge
recognition, the liability component of a compound financial instrument is
accounting are recognized immediately in the income statement within “cost
measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The equity
of goods sold”.
component of a compound financial instrument is not remeasured subsequent to initial recognition except on conversion or expiry.
3.10 Inventories
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is
after the balance sheet date.
determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The cost of finished goods and work in progress comprises raw materials, direct labor, other
3.14 Current and deferred income tax
direct costs and related production overheads (based on normal operating capacity). It excludes borrowing costs. Net realizable value is the estimated
The tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is
selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable sell-
recognized in the income statement, except to the extent that it relates to
ing expenses. Costs of inventories include the transfer from equity of any
items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this
gains/losses on qualifying cash flow hedges relating to purchases of raw
case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or equity,
materials.
respectively.
3.11 t rade receivables
enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws where the company’s subsidiaries and associates operate and generate Trade receivables are classified as current assets if payment is anticipated
taxable income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax
within one year or earlier, and as non-current assets when payment is antici-
returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are
pated after one year.
subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate on
Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less provi-
the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities. Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on all
sion for impairment. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is
temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabili-
established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able
ties and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 58
n otes to the Financial Statements
However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial
as employee benefit expense when they are due. Prepaid contributions are
recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business
recognized as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the
combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting
future payments is available to the Group.
nor taxable profit nor loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the
Other post-employment benefits
balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred
Some Group companies (mainly in Italy) provide a type of severance pay
income tax asset is realized or the deferred income tax liability is settled.
when an employee leaves or retires from the company. The right to these
Deferred income tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is prob-
benefits is usually based on the employee receiving a certain percentage of
able that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary
his annual salary for work at the company, when the employee leaves the
differences can be utilized.
company. The compensation is based on the employee’s salary on the date
Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on
employment is terminated. The anticipated cost of these benefits is allocat-
investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the timing of the
ed over the employment period using an accounting method that is similar
reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group and it is
to the method used for defined benefit pension plans. These obligations are
probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable
valued annually by independent qualified actuaries.
future. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a
Termination benefits
legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated before
liabilities and when the deferred income taxes assets and liabilities relate
the normal retirement date, or whenever an employee accepts voluntary
to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the taxable
redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The Group recognizes termina-
entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to settle the
tion benefits when it is demonstrably committed to either: terminating the
balances on a net basis.
employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal; or providing termination benefits as a result of
3.15 e mployee benefits
an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. Benefits falling due more than 12 months after the end of the reporting period are discounted to their
Pension obligations
present value.
Group companies operate various pension schemes. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or trustee-admin-
Bonus plans
istered funds, determined by periodic actuarial calculations. The Group has
The Group recognizes a liability and an expense for bonuses, based on a for-
both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. A defined contribution
mula that takes into consideration the bonus-generating parameters estab-
plan is a pension plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a
lished for the bonus. The Group recognizes a provision where contractually
separate legal entity. The Group has no legal or constructive obligations to
obliged or where there is a past practice that has created a constructive
pay further contributions if the legal entity does not hold sufficient assets
obligation.
to pay all employees the benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods. A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that is not based
3.16 t rade payables
on defined contributions. A defined benefit plan typically defines an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually
Trade payables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently meas-
dependent on one or more factors such as age, years of service
ured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
and compensation. The liability recognized in the balance sheet in respect of defined
Trade payables are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities.
benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date less the fair value of plan assets, together with
3.17 Provisions
adjustments for unrecognized actuarial gains or losses and past service costs. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by independent
Provisions for environmental restoration, restructuring costs and legal
actuaries using the projected unit credit method. The present value of the
claims are recognized when the Group has a present legal or construc-
defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future
tive obligation as a result of past events; it is probable that an outflow of
cash outflows using interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that are
resources will be required to settle the obligation; and the amount has been
denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid, and that have
reliably estimated. Restructuring provisions comprise mainly employee
terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension liability.
termination payments. Provisions for future warranty demands are based on
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and
historical information about the guarantee demand and current trends that
changes in actuarial assumptions exceeding the higher of 10 percent of the
may indicate that future demands may deviate from the historical. Provisions
value of administrative assets and 10 percent of the defined-benefit obliga-
are not recognized for future operating losses.
tion are charged or credited to income over the employees’ expected average remaining working lives.
Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation.
Past-service costs are recognized immediately in income, unless the changes to the pension plan are conditional on the employees remaining in
3.18 Revenue recognit ion
service for a specified period of time (the vesting period). In this case, the past-service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting
Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable
period.
for the sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of the Group’s
For defined contribution plans, the Group pays contributions to publicly or privately administered pension insurance plans on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. The Group has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. The contributions are recognized
activities. Revenue is shown net of value-added tax, returns, rebates and discounts and after eliminating sales within the Group. The Group recognizes revenue when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 5 9
n otes to the Financial Statements
entity and specific criteria have been met for each of the Group’s activities as described below. The amount of revenue is not considered to be reliably measurable until all contingencies relating to the sale have been resolved. The Group bases its estimates on historical results, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction and the specifics of each arrangement. Sales of goods – wholesale The Group manufactures and sells a range of air filtration solutions in the wholesale market or to end customers. Sales of goods are recognized when a Group entity has delivered products to the customer. Delivery does not occur until the products have been shipped to the specified location, the risks of obsolescence and loss have been transferred to the wholesaler, and either the wholesaler has accepted the products in accordance with the sales contract, the acceptance provisions have lapsed, or the Group has objective evidence that all criteria for acceptance have been satisfied. The principle for revenue recognition for work in progress is found under the heading Service assignments/contracting projects. Other revenue is recognized as follows: • Rental income is recognized during the period the rental refers to. • Royalties and similar income are recognized in accordance with the economic significance of the current agreement. • Dividend income: when the right to receive payment is established as certain.
3.19 Ser vice assignments/cont ract ing projects For completed service assignments and contracting projects, the income and expenses related to the assignment/project are recognized as revenue and costs, respectively, in relation to the degree of completion on the balance sheet date (gradual revenue recognition). The degree of completion is determined by comparing incurred costs on the balance sheet date with the estimated total expense of the assignment/project. When the outcome of a service assignment or contracting project cannot be estimated in a reliable way, the revenue is recognized only to the extent that it is corresponded to by incurred costs that will most likely be paid for by the customer. Any anticipated losses on an assignment/project are immediately recognized as costs.
3.20 o perat ing leases Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
3.21 Dividend dis t ribut ion Dividend distribution to the Parent Company’s shareholders is recognized as a liability in the Group’s financial statements in the period in which the dividends are approved by the Parent Company’s shareholders.
3.22 Share capit al
n ote 4. Financial risk management 4.1 Financial risk factors The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, fair value interest rate risk, cash flow risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance. The Group uses derivative financial instruments, such as forward exchange contracts and interest rate swaps, to hedge some financial risk exposure. Risk management is carried out by a central finance department, the Treasury Center, under policies approved by the board of directors, in order to take advantage of economies of scale and synergy effects, and to minimize management risks. The Treasury Center is responsible for the Group’s loan financing, foreign exchange and interest risk management, and functions as an internal bank for the financial transactions of Group companies. The Treasury Center identifies, evaluates and hedges financial risks in close co-operation with the Group’s operating units. The board prepares written policies for overall risk management and for specific areas, such as foreign exchange risks, interest rate risks, credit risks, use of derivative instruments and investment of excess liquidity. The Group’s financial risks are analyzed on a continuous basis and followed up to ensure than the finance policy is being followed. The policy is subject to continuous review, at least once per year. Market risk Foreign exchange risk The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risks in purchases and sales, and in financial transactions in foreign currency. The currency exposure is primarily against the euro and the U.S. dollar. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognized assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign operations. Management has set up a policy to require Group companies to manage their foreign exchange risk against their functional currency. The Group companies are required to hedge their entire foreign exchange risk exposure with the Treasury Center. To manage their foreign exchange risk arising from future commercial transactions and recognized assets and liabilities, entities in the Group use forward contracts, transacted with the Treasury Center. Foreign exchange risk arises when future commercial transactions or recognized assets or liabilities are denominated in a currency that is not the entity’s functional currency. The Treasury Center is responsible for hedging net positions in each currency by using loans in foreign currency and external forward exchange contracts. The Group hedges between 65 percent and 95 percent of the anticipated net flow in each major currency for the next six-month period and between 45 percent and 75 percent for the subsequent 7 to 12 months. External foreign exchange contracts are designated at Group level as hedges of foreign exchange risk on specific assets, liabilities or future transactions on a gross basis. The Parent Company has a number of holdings in foreign subsidiaries with net assets that are exposed to currency translation risks. Currency exposure in the net assets of subsidiaries is not hedged. At December 31, 2009, if the Swedish krona (SEK) had weakened/
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options
strengthened by 10 percent against the U.S. dollar (USD) with all other vari-
are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
ables held constant, post-tax profit for the year would have been SEK 0.2 M (4.7) higher/lower, mainly as a result of foreign exchange gains/losses on translation of trade receivables (both internal and external) and internal loans in USD, in which USD is not the functional currency of the subsidiary, and external loans and derivatives in USD. Equity would have been SEK 1.3 M (0.6) lower/higher, arising mainly from changes in value attributable to cash flow hedges.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 60
n otes to the Financial Statements
At December 31, 2009, if the Swedish krona had weakened/strengthened
at least 10 percent of budgeted/forecast sales. Management also monitors
by 10 percent against the euro (EUR) with all other variables held constant,
rolling forecasts of the Group’s liquidity reserve on the basis of expected
post-tax profit for the year would have been SEK 1.4 M (0.7) higher/lower,
cash flow.
mainly as a result of foreign exchange gains/losses on translation of trade
The table below analyzes the Group’s financial liabilities and net-settled
receivables and trade payables (both external and internal) in which EUR is
derivative financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the
not the functional currency for the subsidiary, and derivatives in EUR. Equity
remaining period at the balance sheet to the contractual maturity date. The
would have been SEK 0.1 M (1.9) lower/higher, arising mainly from changes
amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
in value attributable to cash flow hedges.
Balances due within 12 months equal their carrying balances as the impact of discounting is not significant.
Interest rate risk Since the Group has no significant interest-bearing assets, the Group’s income and operating cash flows are substantially independent of changes in market interest rates. The Group’s interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose the Group to cash-flow interest rate risk. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk. The Group’s principle is to have a fixed interest rate term of between 0 and 3.5 years. During the year the average fixed interest rate term was 11 months (17 months). The calculation of the average fixed interest rate term includes the effects of interest derivative instruments used to manage the interest rate risk in the loan portfolio. The Group manages its cash flow interest-rate risk by using interest-rate
At December 31, 2009
Less than Between Between 3 months 3 months 1 year and o ver a nd 1 year 5 years 5 years
Liabilities to credit institutions
–
504.8
250.0
–
Derivative financial instruments
–
3.1
12.2
–
Trade payables/bills payable
210.2
3.0
0.6
–
t otal
210.2
At December 31, 2008
510.9
262.8
–
Less than Between Between 3 months 3 months 1 year and o ver a nd 1 year 5 years 5 years
Liabilities to credit institutions
310.5
78.5
204.5
1.1
13.2
16.3
–
Trade payables/bills payable
243.2
4.5
4.8
–
t otal
554.8
96.2
swaps. Such interest-rate swaps have the economic effect of converting
Derivative financial instruments
borrowings from floating rates to fixed rates. Generally, the Group raises
128.6
long-term borrowings at floating rates and swaps them into fixed rates that are lower than those available if the Group borrowed at fixed rates directly.
225.6
128.6
Under the interest-rate swaps, the Group agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals (mainly quarterly), the difference between
The table below analyzes the Group’s derivative financial instruments which
fixed contract rates and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by refer-
will be settled on a gross basis into relevant maturity groupings based on
ence to the agreed notional principal amounts.
the remaining period at the balance sheet to the contractual maturity date.
Given the same loan liability, cash and cash equivalents, interest rate
The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash
derivative and the same fixed interest periods and terms at year-end, a
flows. Balances due within 12 months equal their carrying balances as the
change in the market interest rate by 100 points (1 percentage unit), instead
impact of discounting is not significant.
of using contracted interest rates, would change post-tax profit by SEK 1.9 M SEK 2.6 M (0.3). This would have been an effect mainly of higher/lower
At December 31, 2009
interest expenses for borrowing at a variable rate.
Forward foreign exchange
(0.2) over the average fixed interest period, and interest income by
Equity would have been SEK 2.3 M (8.2) lower/higher as an effect of a
Less than 3 months
Between 3 months and 1 year
Between 1 year and 5 years
contracts – cash flow hedges
reduction/increase in the fair value of interest rate swaps used as cash flow
– outflow
-154.2
–
-195.5
hedges.
– inflow
154.6
–
194.7
– outflow
-41.4
–
-20.9
– inflow
41.5
–
20.6
–
-1.1
Between 3 months and 1 year
Between 1 year and 5 years
Credit risk Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to customers, including outstanding receivables and committed transactions. The Group has no significant concentrations of credit risks. The Group has policies in place to ensure that sales of products and
Forward foreign exchange contracts – held for trading
t otal
0.5
services are made to customers with appropriate credit history and has the necessary provisions for uncertain receivables. Historically, the Group has Derivative counterparties and cash transactions are limited to high-
At December 31, 2008
credit-quality financial institutions. Most of the Group’s financial assets and
Forward foreign exchange
cash and cash equivalents are placed with the Group’s two main banks, SEB
contracts – cash flow hedges
had very low bad credit losses (Note 30).
and Danske Bank. The credit rating for these banks, according to Standard
– outflow
& Poor’s, is A for both SEB and Danske Bank.
– inflow
Liquidity risk Liquidity risks are basically managed with caution by maintaining sufficient liquid funds and marketable securities, keeping available financing through adequate contracted credit facilities and having the possibility to close market positions. Due to the dynamic nature of its underlying businesses, the Group aims to have liquid funds and available credits that can amount to
Less than 3 months
-118.6
-107.5
–
60.1
47.6
–
-13.5
-88.1
–
–
0.0
–
Forward foreign exchange contracts – held for trading – outflow – inflow t otal
-72.0
-148.0
–
No derivative financial instruments are due over 5 years from now. C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 6 1
n otes to the Financial Statements
Price risk
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
t otal
Price risk refers to the risk that costs for direct and indirect materials rise
when underlying raw material prices increase in the world market. The Group
Assets
is affected by changes in raw material and energy prices in connection with
Financial assets at fair
delivery agreements the Group has entered into, in which prices are linked
value through profit or loss
to raw material prices in the global market. Raw material price risks are
– Trading derivatives
–
0.1
–
0.1
managed mainly through agreements with suppliers.
– Derivatives used for hedging
–
6.2
–
6.2
4.2 Capit al risk management
t otal assets
–
6.3
–
6.3
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s
Liabilities
ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for share-
Financial liabilities at fair
holders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capi-
value through profit or loss
tal structure to reduce the cost of capital.
– Trading derivatives
–
0.4
–
0.4
– Derivatives used for hedging
–
27.5
–
27.5
t otal liabilities
–
27.9
–
27.9
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust
balance
the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. Consistent with others in the industry, the Group monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by total
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on
capital. Net debt is calculated as total borrowings (Note 42) less cash and
quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. A market is regarded as
cash equivalents and other interest-bearing assets. Total capital is calcu-
active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange,
lated as “Equity” as shown in the consolidated statement of financial position
dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service or regulatory agency, and
plus net debt.
those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis.
The gearing ratios at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active 2008
Interest-bearing liabilities
904.8
1 092.6
Less: cash and cash equivalents
-440.8
-242.5
-53.7
-58.3
410.3
791.8
Less: other interest-bearing assets
market (for example, over-the-counter derivatives) is determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximize the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity-specific estimates. If all significant inputs required to fair value an instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.
n et debt Total equity t otal capital
1 930.6
1 837.7
2 340.9
2 629.5
Gearing ratio
18%
30%
If one or more of the significant inputs is not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3. Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include: • Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments. • The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of
During the year the Group had a strong cash flow which generated high liquidity that was partly used for repayments of borrowings. This reduced the Group’s net debt and also contributed to reducing the gearing ratio, compared with last year. The requirements from the Group’s principal banks regarding the interest-coverage ratio and gearing ratio were fulfilled at December 31,
the estimated future cash flows based on observable yield curves. • The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date, with the resulting value discounted back to present value. • Other techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, are used to determine fair value for the remaining financial instruments.
2009. Note that all of the resulting fair value estimates are included in level 2.
4.3 Fair value es t imat ion
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as publicly traded derivatives) is based on quoted market prices at the balance
Effective 1 January 2009, the Group adopted the amendment to IFRS 7 for
sheet date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the
financial instruments that are measured in the balance sheet at fair value.
Group is the current bid price.
This requires disclosure of fair value measurements by level of the following
Quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments are used
fair value measurement hierarchy:
for long-term debt. The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the
• Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabili-
present value of estimated future cash flows. The fair value of forward for-
ties (level 1). • Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2). • Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (level 3).
eign exchange contracts is determined using quoted foreign exchange rates at the balance sheet date. The recognized value for trade receivables and trade payables, after any impairment losses, is anticipated to correspond to their fair values since these items are current by nature. The fair value of financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for
The following table presents the Group’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value at December 31, 2009.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 62
similar financial instruments.
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 5. Critical judgments in applying the entity’s accounting
judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income
policies
taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain during the ordinary course of business. Where
The Group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The
the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that
resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabili-
were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made. There are no current tax audit issues in the Group on December 31, 2009.
ties within the next financial year are summarized and specified below.
Pension benefits
Estimated impairment of goodwill
The present value of the pension obligations depends on a number of factors
The Group tests annually whether goodwill has suffered any impairment in
that are determined on an actuarial basis using a number of assumptions.
accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 3.6. The recoverable
The assumptions used in determining the net cost (income) for pensions
amounts of cash-generating units have been determined based on value-in-
include the discount rate. Any changes in these assumptions will impact the
use calculations. These calculations require the use of estimates (Note 25).
carrying amount of pension obligations.
A sensitivity analysis indicates that there would be no need for reduc-
The Group determines the appropriate discount rate at the end of each
ing the carrying amount of goodwill if the revised estimated gross margin
year. This is the interest rate that should be used to determine the present
on December 31, 2009 had been 10 percent lower than management’s
value of estimated future cash outflows expected to be required to settle the
estimates, or if the revised estimated pre-tax discount rate applied to the
pension obligations. In determining the appropriate discount rate, the Group
discounted cash flows had been 10 percent higher than management’s
considers the interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that are denomi-
estimates.
nated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid, and that have terms
If the actual gross margin had been higher or the pre-tax discounted
to maturity approximating the terms of the related pension liability.
rate lower than management’s estimates, the Group would not be able to
Other key assumptions for pension obligations are based in part on
reverse any impairment losses that arose on goodwill.
current market conditions. Additional information is disclosed in Note 43. If the discount rate would increase/decrease 0.5 percentage points from
Income taxes
management’s estimates, the carrying amount of pension obligations would
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Significant
be an estimated SEK 15.2 M lower or SEK 16.2 M higher.
n ote 6. n et sales and operating profit by geographical segment Fiscal year 2009
n orth
Gas
europe
America
Asia
turbines
o ther
2 344.9
1 046.9
318.8
719.3
72.7
0.2
–
4 502.8
62.5
72.2
38.8
11.4
8.7
400.1
-593.7
0.0
357.6
730.7
81.4
400.3
-593.7
54.2
-10.4
-58.7
–
439.1
markets
h olding
company elimination
Group
Revenues External sales Internal sales t otal revenues o perating profit per market
2 407.4
1 119.1
4 502.8
297.5
130.4
26.1
1 663.0
621.4
303.9
420.8
35.8
146.2
-530.0
2 661.1
675.8
101.6
80.2
285.8
29.5
84.7
-530.0
727.6
o ther information Operating assets Operating liabilities Investments in property. plant. equipment and intangible assets
96.8
28.1
13.5
7.9
0.4
9.8
6.5
163.0
Depreciation
-71.2
-26.2
-16.1
-4.5
-1.4
-4.2
-5.9
-129.5
Fiscal year 2008
n orth
Gas
europe
America
Asia
turbines
o ther
2 236.4
1 067.1
267.0
718.8
71.7
0.0
–
4 361.0
60.7
72.2
33.8
24.4
0.3
399.3
-590.7
0.0
300.8
743.2
72.0
399.3
-590.7
61.8
3.3
-60.6
–
411.2
markets
h olding
company elimination
Group
Revenues External sales Internal sales t otal revenues o perating profit per market
2 297.1
1 139.3
4 361.0
271.3
108.0
27.3
1 755.3
663.0
274.2
517.1
46.4
212.8
-437.4
3 031.4
566.3
134.3
87.7
341.1
29.0
114.8
-437.4
835.9
o ther information Operating assets Operating liabilities Investments in property. plant. equipment and intangible assets Depreciation
70.6
23.6
66.6
13.3
1.2
6.4
6.7
188.4
-68.5
-21.3
-11.9
-5.4
-0.6
-2.2
-3.8
-113.9
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 6 3
n otes to the Financial Statements
Management has determined the operating segments based on the reports
The Group’s interest-bearing liabilities are not considered to be segment
reviewed by management that are used to make strategic decisions.
liabilities but rather are managed by the Treasury function.
The Group’s operations are conducted primarily in three geographical segments. Sales figures are based on the country where the company has
The liabilities of reportable segments are reconciled to total liabilities as follows:
its geographic domicile, except for companies operating in the gas turbine segment. The gas turbine segment includes Camfil Farr Power Systems
2009
2008
AB, Camfil Farr Power Systems GmbH, Camfil Farr Air Filtration India Ltd
Segment liabilites for reportable segments
727.6
835.9
and the gas turbine divisions in Canada and China. Other markets include
u nallocated: 11.8
the Swedish company for agent sales, Camfil International AB, the Brazilian
Adjusted for IFRS
13.8
production company in South America and the new dust collection company
Deferred tax
49.0
67.2
in Denmark.
Income tax liability
32.9
43.6
16.2
24.3
to total assets are measured in a manner consistent with that of the financial
Non-current borrowings
748.8
924.3
statements. These assets are allocated based on the operations of the seg-
Provisions for pensions and other provisions
148.9
146.5
ment and the physical location of the asset.
Other
-4.2
0.5
The amounts provided to the strategic steering committee with respect
Non-current derivative financial instruments
Segment assets consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, inventories, derivative financial instruments designated as
t otal liabilities per the balance sheet
1 733.0
2 054.1
hedges of future commercial transactions, receivables and operating cash. Investment in shares (classified as available-for-sale financial assets or financial assets at fair value through profit or loss) held by the Group are not
Based on where customers are located, net sales are distributed by geographical segments as follows:
considered to be segment assets but rather are managed by the Treasury Group
function.
2009
2008
Europe
2 843.5
2 786.1
financial instruments designated as hedges of future commercial transac-
North America
1 145.9
1 133.5
tions). They exclude items such as taxation and corporate borrowings.
Asia
355.8
310.2
Other markets
157.6
131.2
Segment liabilities comprise operating liabilities (including derivative
Capital expenditure comprises additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, including additions resulting from acquisitions
t otal net sales
through business combinations.
4 502.8
4 361.0
Inter-segment transfers or transactions are entered into under the normal commercial terms and conditions that would also be available to
The company is domiciled in Sweden. The result of its revenues from exter-
unrelated third parties.
nal customers in Sweden is SEK 437.8 M (441.3) and the total revenue from
A reconciliation of operating profit to profit before tax and discontinued
external customers from other countries is SEK 4,065.0 M (3,919.7). The breakdown of revenue per country is disclosed in the table above.
operations is provided as follows:
The total of non-current assets other than financial instruments and
2009
2008
deferred tax assets (there are no employment benefit assets and rights aris-
Operating profit for reportable segments
439.1
411.2
ing under insurance contracts) located in Sweden is SEK 284.4 M (252.1)
Adjusted for IFRS
3.3
7.0
Intra-Group profit, inventories
-1.9
-10.7
u nallocated:
and the total of these non-current assets located in other countries is
Restructuring costs
-19.0
-7.5
Financial items. net
-41.3
-43.8
-4.1
0.2
Other
SEK 1,420.1 M (1,503.2).
n ote 7. expenses by nature Group
Profit before tax
376.1
356.4
Depreciation and impairment
The assets of reportable segments are reconciled to total assets as follows:
Employment benefit expense
(Note 10) (Note 9) Segment assets for reportable segments
2009 2 661.1
u nallocated: Goodwill
2008
Raw materials and
3 031.4
consumables used
839.8
691.6
31.0
29.8
Intra-Group profit, inventories
-31.8
-29.9
Adjusted for IFRS
29.2
30.2
Deferred tax
61.0
66.1
distribution costs and
Income tax assets
28.3
31.8
administrative expenses
Long-term receivables
45.6
44.4
-0.6
-0.1
t otal assets per the balance sheet
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 64
3 663.5
2008
2009
2008
129.5
113.9
4.1
2.3
1 422.8
1 293.8
73.9
67.0
1 337.0
1 324.8
-0.1
-0.4
Raw materials and machinery
Surplus values of buildings
Other
Parent Company
2009
3 895.3
for sale to subsidiaries Other expenses
–
–
324.8
330.6
1 196.1
1 228.3
81.6
66.7
4 085.4
3 960.8
484.3
t otal costs of goods sold, 466.2
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 8. Compensation paid to auditors
n ote 9. employee remuneration
Fees and compensation for costs
Group
Wages, salaries and other remuneration, and social security contributions: Parent Company
2009
2008
2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers
2008
2009
2008
Wages and salaries
51.7
46.9
Social security contributions
18.3
15.2
8.9
8.2
Auditing assignments
5.4
4.1
0.6
0.7
Pension costs – defined
Other assignments
2.2
1.8
0.7
1.1
contribution plans
o ther auditors Auditing assignments
1.6
1.2
–
–
Other assignments
1.7
3.8
0.7
0.3
10.9
10.9
2.0
2.1
t otal in Parent Company
79.0
Wages and salaries t otal
Social security contributions
70.3
1 102.8
1 011.4
246.8
226.3
67.5
50.6
5.7
5.5
Pension costs – defined Auditing assignments involve the auditing of the annual report, the account-
contribution plans
ing records and the administration of the Board of Directors and the
Pension costs – defined
President, other assignments related to the business of the company’s
benefit plans (Note 43)
auditors, as well as advising or other forms of assistance related to findings t otal in Group
made in such audits or the execution of other such tasks. All other work is
1 422.8
1 293.8
classified as “Other assignments”.
2009
2008
Wages, salaries
Sociala security
Wages, salaries
Sociala security
and other
contributions
Pension
and other
contributions
Pension
(excl. pensions)
costs
remuneration
(excl. pensions)
remuneration
costs
Board members, managing directors and other senior executives
20.0
6.7
4.1
19.7
5.4
3.8
Other employees
31.7
11.6
4.8
27.2
9.8
4.4
t otal in Parent Company
51.7
18.3
8.9
46.9
15.2
8.2
Board members, managing directors and other senior executives
106.8
17.5
10.6
87.9
13.9
10.1
Other employees
996.0
229.3
62.6
923.5
212.4
46.0
246.8
73.2
226.3
56.1
t otal in Group
1 102.8
1 011.4
Average number of employees The number of employees totaled 3,249 (3,321) on December 31, 2009.
2009
2008
Average
o f
Average
o f
number
which
number
which
of employees
men
of employees
men
Parent Company France
4
25%
4
25%
Malaysia
6
83%
3
67%
Sweden
57
78%
49
73%
t otal in Parent Company
67
75%
56
63%
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 6 5
n otes to the Financial Statements
2009
2008
Absenteeism due to illness in Parent Company
Average
o f
Average
o f
number
which
number
which
of employees
men
of employees
men
Foreign subsidiaries
2009
Total absenteeism due to illness, %
2008
1%
of which long-term absenteeism due to illness – absenteeism due to illness for men
Australia
60
77%
54
74%
– absenteeism due to illness for women
Belgium
21
86%
21
81%
– employees – 29 years old
1%
–
–
1%
1%
2%
3%
10%
2%
Brazil
13
62%
14
51%
– employees 30-49 years old
1%
1%
Denmark
31
58%
29
25%
– employees 50 years old and older
1%
2%
United Kingdom
196
59%
205
57%
Finland
22
73%
25
72%
France
310
68%
298
65%
3
67%
2
50%
In the Group, depreciation totaling SEK 90.2 M (80.7) is included in cost
Netherlands
28
89%
27
85%
of goods sold, SEK 1.2 M (1.5) in selling costs and SEK 38.1 M (31.7) in
India
50
86%
29
86%
administrative expenses. In the Parent Company, depreciation amounting to
Iran
1
0%
1
100%
Ireland
43
79%
45
82%
Italy
21
67%
19
63%
5
60%
5
60%
n ote 11. Research and development costs Research and development costs for the year totaled SEK 47.5 M (38.3) in
United Arab Emirates
Japan Canada
277
68%
246
61%
China
137
53%
138
57%
Malaysia
256
58%
264
59%
Norway
30
70%
29
69%
New Zealand
15
80%
6
83%
Poland
5
80%
5
80%
Russia
1
100%
1
100%
55
55%
57
51%
9
44%
9
33%
117
38%
104
61%
16
75%
15
73%
429
62%
450
62%
13
62%
9
33%
Switzerland Singapore Slovakia Spain Sweden Taiwan Thailand
27
41%
29
45%
Germany
375
71%
387
73%
United States
602
64%
742
64%
14
71%
–
–
Austria
n ote 10. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
SEK 4.2 M (2.3) is included in administrative expenses.
the Group and SEK 23.8 M (24.4) in the Parent Company.
n ote 12. o perating leases During the year leasing fees paid for operating leases totaled SEK 41.6 M (41.8) in the Group and SEK 5.4 M (4.1) in the Parent Company. The Group’s operating leases consist mostly of leases for premises, vehicles and office equipment. The nominal value of the Group’s contracted future leasing fees, related to agreements with a remaining term exceeding one year, was as follows: Group Due for payment within one year
subsidiaries
3 182
64%
3 265
65%
t otal in Group
3 249
64%
3 321
64%
2008
34.1
39.3
2009 5.4
2008 4.1
64.2
56.8
21.6
16.5
4.4
9.7
–
–
Due for payment later than one year but within five years
t otal in foreign
Parent Company
2009
Due for payment later than five years t otal
102.7
105.8
27.0
20.6
Gender distribution in the Group (including subsidiaries) for board members
n ote 13. Financial income/Interest income and similar items
and other senior executives:
2009
Group
2008
n umber
on balance
o f which
sheet date
men
n umber on balance o f which sheet date
men
Group (incl. subsidiaries) Board members
163
94%
153
94%
President and other senior executives t otal
102 265
93% 93%
100 253
92% 93%
Parent Company
2008
2009
2008
Interest income on cash and cash equivalents
3.1
8.3
0.6
5.0
Interest income from Group companies
–
–
47.3
62.8
71.6
50.3
109.7
79.4
(Note 43)
8.9
8.6
–
–
Other financial income
0.5
0.1
1.0
0.4
84.1
67.3
Exchange rate differences Return on pension assets
t otal
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 66
2009
158.6
147.6
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 14. Financial costs/Interest expenses and similar items Group Interest expense – borrowings
Difference between the Group’s tax charge and the tax charge based on
Parent Company
2009
2008
2009
2008
41.5
49.5
36.3
45.6
12.3
10.1
–
–
Interest expense – defined benefit pension liability (Note 43) Interest expense – Group companies Exchange rate differences
–
–
54.3
35.2
71.6
50.3
56.8
51.8
Capital loss on sale
0.0
0.9
–
–
Other financial costs
0.0
0.3
0.7
0.6
t otal
125.4
111.1
148.1
133.2
nominal tax rates: Parent Company
2009
2008
Profit before tax
170.0
45.9
Tax based on the current rate for the Parent Company
-44.7
-12.9
Income not subject to tax
49.8
15.5
Non-deductible expenses
-0.3
-4.4
Tax attributable to prior years
-0.3
0.0
t ax charge for Parent Company
4.5
-1.8
The tax on the Group’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of the consolidated entities as follows:
n ote 15. Result from participations in Group companies Parent Company
2009
Write-down of shares in Group companies
2008
–
-15.0
Dividends from subsidiaries
181.9
78.1
t otal
181.9
63.1
n ote 16. Appropriations Parent Company
2009
Straight-line depreciation in excess of cost
2008
2.2
0.6
Tax allocation reserve
1.9
13.2
Inventory reserve
0.5
-0.4
t otal
4.6
13.4
Group
2009
2008
Profit before tax
376.1
356.4
-108.2
-106.8
Tax calculated at domestic tax rates applicable to profits in the respective countries Tax effects of: – Income not subject to tax
5.9
12.5
– Non-deductible expenses
-5.5
-13.9
– Net deduction for losses
-0.5
2.2
Remeasurement of deferred tax 0.4
-1.1
Adjustments in respect of prior years -4.4
– change in tax rates
-1.5
t ax charge
-112.3
-108.6
The weighted average applicable tax rate was 29.9% (30.0%) in the Group and 8.1% (-10.3%) in the Parent Company. This was an effect of lower tax rates in a number of countries where Camfil Farr conducts operations and
n ote 17. Income tax/t ax on profit for the year Group
2009
Current tax
Parent Company
2008
Current tax on profit for the year -121.8
2009
2008
-97.5
3.2
4.6
-1.6
-0.3
0.1
Adjustments in respect of prior years t otal
-4.4 -126.2
-99.1
2.9
4.7
The income tax relating to components of other comprehensive income, which is charged to equity, is as follows: Group
2009
Parent Company
2008
2009
2008
Fair value reserves in – Hedging reserve
Origination and reversal of 12.1
-1.8
–
–
Tax on hedging reserve for equity
1.4
-5.9
1.6
-6.5
Impact of change in tax rates
0.4
-1.8
–
–
13.9
-9.5
1.6
-6.5
-112.3
-108.6
4.5
-1.8
t otal
in the coming year.
shareholders' equity:
Deferred tax (n ote 33) temporary differences
the Group capitalizing on loss-carry-forwards that are expected to be used
-1.4
5.9
1.5
-6.5
–
–
16.8
24.0
18.3
17.5
Current tax in received/paid Group contributions t otal
-1.4
5.9
n ote 18. n et foreign exchange gains/losses t otal reported tax charge
The exchange differences charged to the income statement are as follows: Group
2009
Parent Company
2008
2009
2008
Cost of goods sold
-0.3
5.0
1.8
4.8
Financial income
71.6
50.3
109.7
79.4
Financial costs
-71.6
-50.3
-56.8
-51.8
t otal
-0.3
54.7
32.4
5.0
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 6 7
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 19. earnings per share
n ote 21. Land and buildings Group
Group
2009
2008
2009
2008
Profit attributable to owners of the company
262.9
247.4
Acquisition value at January 1
682.2
607.0
Profit used to determine basic earnings per share
Reclassifications 262.9
247.4
Interest expense on convertible debt
0.9
2.1
Tax attributable to above items
-0.2
-0.6
Investments for the year
29.6
–
5.3
8.5
Sales and disposals for the year
-25.9
–
Translation difference
-29.3
66.7
Acquisition value at December 31
661.9
682.2
Straight-line depreciation at January 1
-295.4
-238.8
Profit used to determine diluted earnings per share
263.6
248.9
Average number of shares before dilution
11 379 310
11 379 310
230 000
230 000
Sales and disposals for the year
15.8
–
Straight-line depreciation for the year (Note 10)
-24.2
-21.8
Translation difference
13.3
-34.8
Assumed conversion of convertible debentures
Straight-line depreciation at December 31
-290.5
Construction in progress at January 1 Average number of shares after dilution
11 609 310
-295.4
4.0
3.1
Construction in progress
42.2
0.9
Construction in progress at December 31
46.2
4.0
417.6
390.8
11 609 310
Basic earnings per share (SEK)
23.11
21.74
Diluted earnings per share (SEK)
22.70
21.44
Planned residual value at December 31
The Parent Company has a convertible debenture loan with dilutive potential
Book value of buildings in Sweden
14.4
14.4
ordinary shares. The convertible debt is assumed to have been converted
t ax assessment value of buildings in Sweden
38.0
38.0
into ordinary shares and the net profit is adjusted to eliminate the interest expense less the tax effect. On June 10, 2005, a new convertible subordi-
No bank loans were secured by buildings and land (Note 46).
nated loan was issued with rights to convert to a total of 230,000 shares during the period March 31, 2010 – April 30, 2010. The option program that was subscribed for on October 25, 2004 was redeemed in 2008 at market
n ote 22. Machinery and production equipment
value. The total effect on shareholders’ equity was SEK 26.1 M.
n ote 20. Dividend per share A dividend of SEK 7.50 per share for 2009, amounting to a total of SEK 85.3 M,
Group
Parent Company
2009
2008
Acquisition value at January 1
713.0
613.7
–
–
0.0
-1.1
–
–
Reclassifications
2009
2008
Increase through company
will be proposed. These financial statements do not reflect the dividend
acquisitions (Note 49)
payable. Dividends paid in 2008 and 2007 amounted to SEK 82.5 M and
Investments for the year
–
1.0
–
–
78.6
71.8
7.5
–
SEK 78.5 M, respectively, corresponding to a dividend of SEK 7.25 for 2008
Sales and disposals for the year
and SEK 6.90 for 2007.
Translation difference
-110.3
-30.0
–
–
-22.1
57.6
–
–
at December 31
659.2
713.0
Depreciation at January 1
-392.7
-341.1
–
–
0.0
1.5
–
–
107.5
35.2
–
–
-70.6
-62.6
-1.2
–
6.9
-25.7
–
–
Acquisition value
Reclassifications Sales and disposals for the year
7.5
–
Depreciation for the year (Note 10) Translation difference Depreciation at December 31
-348.9
-392.7
-1.2
–
Machinery construction in progress at January 1
24.1
5.8
–
–
-16.8
18.3
–
–
7.3
24.1
0.0
–
344.4
6.3
–
Machinery construction in progress Machinery construction in progress at December 31 Planned residual value at December 31 C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 68
317.6
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 23. equipment
The value of future payment obligations related to finance leases is reported Group
Parent Company
equipment
2009
2008
2009
2008
Acquisition value at January 1
258.0
189.9
21.0
18.8
-29.6
1.1
–
–
0.8
0.5
–
–
Reclassifications Increase through company acquisitions (Note 49) Investments for the year
30.2
65.6
2.0
2.5
Sales and disposals for the year
-23.8
-15.4
-2.1
-0.3
-3.0
16.3
–
–
Translation difference Acquisition value at December 31
232.6
258.0
20.9
21.0
Depreciation at January 1
-151.0
-128.6
-15.4
-13.9
Reclassifications
0.0
-1.5
–
–
20.5
12.8
2.1
0.3
Depreciation for the year (Note 10) -29.7
-25.7
-2.0
-1.8
-8.0
–
–
Sales and disposals for the year Translation difference
1.5
-158.7
-151.0
Group equipment
2009
-15.3
-15.4
Parent Company
2008
2009
2008
Value of remeasurement at January 1
-0.1
-0.1
–
–
Impairment charge for the year
0.0
–
–
–
Translation difference
0.0
0.0
–
–
-0.1
-0.1
–
–
Planned residual value at December 31
73.8
106.9
5.6
5.6
Depreciation in excess of cost at January 1
–
–
-1.9
-1.3
–
–
-2.2
-0.6
–
–
-4.1
-1.9
Depreciation in excess of cost for the year Depreciation in excess of cost at December 31 Planned residual value in excess of cost at December 31 73.8
106.9
1.5
3.7
n ote 24. Finance leases
held under finance leases as follows: Acquisition
Accumulated
value
depreciation
Land and buildings
2009
2008
23.9
25.4
2009 8.2
2008 7.6
Machinery and production equipment
7.3
5.3
3.7
2.3
Equipment
17.3
15.8
6.8
6.5
48.5
46.5
18.7
t otal
2009
2008
7.2
10.4
10.6
9.4
Long-term portion Due for payment later than one year but within five years t otal liability recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position
17.8
19.8
There are no payment obligations due later than five years from the balance sheet date. The majority of the finance leases are attributable to the financing of vehicles in the Group. However, there is a finance lease for a building in Italy. No new significant finance leases were signed in 2009.
n ote 25. Goodwill
2009
2008
Residual value before impairment charge at January 1 Acquisitions for the year (Note 49) Translation difference
1 016.9
899.7
17.7
23.9
-36.1
93.3
Residual value before impairment charge at December 31
998.5
1 016.9
at January 1/December 31
-111.8
-111.8
Planned residual value at December 31
886.7
905.1
Impairment tests for goodwill Goodwill is allocated to the Group’s cash-generating units (CGUs) identified according to country of operation. EA segment-level summary of the goodwill allocation is presented below: Europe Nordic countries
210.8
206.6
Germany
37.4
39.8
Austria
17.7
–
8.6
8.4
274.5
254.8
United States
436.0
488.9
Canada
131.9
122.3
567.9
611.2
18.2
15.2
18.2
15.2
United Kingdom North America
The Group’s property, plant and equipment include leased equipment that is
Short-term portion
Impairment charge
Value of remeasurement at December 31
Liability
Group
Depreciation at December 31
partly as non-current liabilities and partly as current liabilities, as follows:
16.4
Asia Australia Other markets India New Zealand
t otal
8.6
8.7
17.5
15.2
26.1
23.9
886.7
905.1
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 6 9
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 27. Financial assets
The recoverable amount of a CGU is determined based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations use cash flow projections based on financial budgets approved by management and covering the next year.
Parent Company
Participations in Group companies
Cash flows beyond the next year are extrapolated using estimated
2009
Acquisition value at January 1
growth rates. Management determined budgeted gross margin based on past performance and its expectations for the market development. The weighted average growth rates used are consistent with the forecasts included in industry reports. The discount rates used are pre-tax and reflect specific risks relat-
Group
Parent Company
2008
2009
2008
40.4
29.7
3.5
0.3
6.0
6.6
0.3
3.2
Sales for the year
-17.7
0.0
–
–
Translation difference
-0.8
4.1
–
–
Acquisition value at December 31
27.9
40.4
3.8
3.5
-32.3
-25.5
-0.8
-0.3
17.7
0.0
–
–
for the year
-5.0
-3.8
-0.9
-0.5
Translation difference
0.6
-3.0
–
–
Sales for the year
69.8
-269.0
-254.0
0.0
-15.0
Impairment charge at January 1/December 31 Book value at December 31
-269.0
-269.0
1 734.0
1 593.3
Parent Company Receivables from Group companies
2009
2008
Acquisition value at January 1
797.0
680.6
15.9
66.2
-150.0
-19.3
-20.2
69.5
Acquisition value at December 31
642.7
797.0
Book value at December 31
642.7
797.0
Loans granted for the year Repayments and amortization
Straight-line depreciation at January 1
1 792.5
69.8
Impairment charge for the year
2009
Investments for the year
19.5
1 933.2
Impairment charge at January 1
n ote 26. o ther intangible assets
Acquisition value at January 1
140.7
Revaluation at January 1/December 31
ing to the relevant segments.
1 773.0
Investments for the year Acquisition value at December 31
2008
1 792.5
Straight-line depreciation
of loans for the year Exchange rate differences
Straight-line depreciation at December 31
-19.0
-32.3
-1.7
-0.8
Planned residual value at December 31
Group n on-current receivables
8.8
8.1
2.1
2.7
Intangible assets consist primarily of computer software. Depreciation costs totaling SEK 5.0 M (3.8) are included in the administrative expenses of the Group. Depreciation costs amounting to SEK 0.9 M (0.5) are included in the administrative expenses of the Parent Company.
Parent Company
2009
2008
44.4
45.5
0.3
Change for the year
2.7
-4.9
–
–
Translation difference
-1.5
3.8
–
–
45.6
44.4
0.3
45.6
44.4
0.3
Acquisition value at January 1
2009
2008 0.3
Acquisition value at December 31 Book value at December 31
0.3 0.3
There is no concentration of credit risk in non-current receivables. The weighted average effective interest rate on receivables was as follows: Parent Company
2009
2008
5.8%
6.2%
Receivables from Group companies
The carrying amounts and fair values of certain receivables were as follows: 2009
Carrying
amounts
Group Other non-current receivables Parent Company Loans to Group companies Other non-current receivables t otal
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 70
45.5
2008 Fair
Carrying
values
amounts
Fair values
45.5
44.4
44.4
642.7
632.5
797.0
773.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
643.0
632.8
797.3
773.5
n otes to the Financial Statements
Fair values are based on discounted cash flows using a discount rate that is
Indirect holdings
based on the interest rate that is estimated to be available to a borrower on
Camfil SA
the balance sheet date.
n ote 28. Shares in subsidiaries Directly owned shareholdings, registration number
Registered
h olding
office
100%
Farr Filter Services Ltd
United Kingdom
100%
Automet Filtration Ltd
United Kingdom
100%
Camfil France Holding SAS
France
100%
Camfil SAS
France
100%
SADI SAS
France
100%
Camfil Airfilter SDN BHD
Malaysia
100%
value
QF Filters Sdn Bhd
Malaysia
100%
New Zealand
100%
Poland
100%
Singapore
100%
Spain
100%
Camfil Farr New Zealand Ltd Trosa, Sweden
Org. no. 55 60 88 - 1327
100%
225.3
Camfil Polska Sp.z.o.o Camfil Farr Singapore Pty Ltd
Camfil Innovation AB Trosa, Sweden
Org. no. 55 64 76 - 6433
100%
5.0
Camfil España SA VVS Amalia AB
Camfil Component AB Org. no. 55 64 96 - 3964
Trosa, Sweden
100%
5.0
Borås, Sweden
100%
10.0
Camfil Farr Power Systems AB Org. no. 55 65 56 - 9356
Camfil International AB Trosa, Sweden
100%
1.0
Trosa, Sweden
100%
20.0
Trosa, Sweden
100%
574.3
Cinisello Balsamo, Italy
100%
0.5
Gemag S.R.L
Cinisello Balsamo, Italy
100%
0.0
Camfil AG
Unterägeri, Switzerland
100%
36.1
Kokkedal, Denmark
100%
8.0
Farr Filtration Ltd
Birmingham, United Kingdom
100%
20.3
Camfil Ltd
Manchester, United Kingdom
100%
34.6
Camfil BV
Ede, The Netherlands
100%
73.3
Reinfeld, Germany
100%
293.2
Helsinki, Finland
100%
5.0
Dublin, Ireland
100%
15.0
Org. no. 55 65 11 - 8501
Sweden
100%
Taiwan
100%
Camfil Farr Power Systems GmbH
Germany
100%
Camfil KG
Germany
100%
Camfil Management GmbH
Germany
100%
United States
100%
India
76%
Camfil Farr Taiwan
Camfil Farr Inc. Camfil Farr Air Filtration India Ltd
Camfil Asia Holding AB Org. no. 55 65 38 - 8344
Mecke Klima GmbH was acquired during the year. The company was previ-
Comlog AB Org. no. 55 62 48 - 9970
Camfil SPA
Camfil A/S
Camfil GmbH Holding Camfil OY Camfil (Irl) Ltd Camfil Farr Australia Pty Ltd
ously Camfil Farr’s agent in Austria (Note 49).
n ote 29. Financial instruments by category The accounting policies for financial instruments have been applied in the Group to the line items below:
100%
28.3
Laval, Canada
100%
118.4
Camfil Farr Filtration (Kunshan) Co. Ltd Kunshan, China
100%
18.2
Camfil Farr Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd Shanghai, China
100%
3.5
Non-current receivables
Sao Paulo, Brazil
100%
2.0
Tokyo, Japan
100%
3.0
Bills receivable
134.6
Camfil Farr Ind. Com. Servicos de Filtros Ltda Camfil Farr Japan KK Camfil Farr s.r.o
Levice, Slovakia
100%
Bangkok, Thailand
100%
4.5
Copenhagen, Denmark
100%
10.6
Camfil Farr (Thailand) Ltd Camfil Singapore Holding PTE Ltd Mecke Klima GmbH t otal
Singapore
100%
13.3
Oslo, Norway
100%
50.3
Vienna, Austria
100%
20.7
1 734.0
Financial Derivatives instruments Loans and used for at fair value trade measured through receivables hedging profit or loss
December 31, 2009
Sydney, Australia
Farr Inc.
Kaare A Rustad AS
h olding
Belgium
Book
Camfil Svenska AB
Camfil APC A/S
Country
t otal
Assets as per balance sheet Current derivative financial instruments Trade receivables Cash and cash equivalents t otal
–
6.2
0.1
6.3
45.6
–
–
45.6
699.1
–
–
699.1
2.7
–
–
2.7
442.7
–
–
442.7
1 190.1
6.2
Derivatives used for measured hedging
o ther financial liabilities
Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss
December 31, 2009
0.1 1 196.4
t otal
Liabilities as per balance sheet Non-current liabilities to credit institutions
–
679.2
–
679.2 24.2
Current liabilities to credit institutions
–
24.2
–
Convertible debenture loan
–
51.4
–
51.4
Trade payables
–
202.5
–
202.5
Bills payable
–
11.3
–
11.3
16.2
–
–
16.2
instruments
11.3
–
0.4
11.7
t otal
27.5
Non-current derivative financial instruments Current derivative financial
968.6
0.4
996.5
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 7 1
n otes to the Financial Statements
The percentage of bad debt losses per geographic area is calculated as the
Financial Derivatives instruments Loans and used for at fair value trade measured through receivables hedging profit or loss
December 31, 2008
n ote 31. Derivative financial instruments Group
Current derivative financial instruments Non-current receivables Bills receivable Cash and cash equivalents
years in relation to total sales over the past three years.
t otal
Assets as per balance sheet
Trade receivables
average percentage between expensed bad debt losses over the past three
–
20.0
3.5
23.5
2009
2008
Assets Liabilities
44.4
–
–
44.4
Interest rate swaps
939.0
–
–
939.0
– fair value hedges
13.7
–
–
13.7
242.5
–
–
242.5
Assets Liabilities
–
21.7
–
29.5
6.2
5.8
20.0
16.6
contracts – held for trading
0.1
0.4
3.5
9.2
t otal
6.3
27.9
23.5
Forward foreign exchange contracts – cash flow hedges Forward foreign exchange
t otal
1 239.6
Derivatives used for measured hedging
20.0
3.5 1 263.1
Financial instruments o ther at fair value financial through liabilities profit or loss
t otal
55.3
Of which non-current portion: Interest rate swaps – cash flow hedges
–
16.2
–
24.3
Liabilities as per balance sheet
Non-current portion
–
16.2
–
24.3
Non-current liabilities to
Current portion
6.3
11.7
23.5
31.0
t otal
6.3
27.9
23.5
55.3
December 31, 2008
credit institutions
–
860.2
–
860.2
–
17.5
–
17.5
Current liabilities to credit institutions Convertible debenture loan
–
50.5
–
50.5
Trade payables
–
233.3
–
233.3
Bills payable
–
19.2
–
19.2
24.3
–
–
24.3
financial instruments
21.8
–
9.2
31.0
t otal
46.1
Parent Company
financial instruments
9.2
n ote 30. Credit quality of financial assets
Of which non-current portion:
The credit quality of trade receivables has been historically high in the
Interest rate swaps
Group. However, the payment culture varies to some extent between geographic areas. None of the financial assets that are fully performing has been renegotiated in the last year. The percentage of trade receivables per geographic area are shown in the table below: 2009 % Bad debt losses/sales Amount
–
29.5
10.9
10.0
29.5
31.5
0.1
0.4
3.5
9.2
11.0
32.1
33.0
1 236.0 t otal
t rade receivables
21.7
Forward foreign exchange contracts – held for trading
1 180.7
–
Forward foreign exchange contracts – cash flow hedges
Current derivative
2008 Assets Liabilities
Interest rate swaps – fair value hedges
Non-current derivative
2009 Assets Liabilities
2008 % Bad debt losses/sales Amount
Counterparties
70.2
– cash flow hedges
–
16.2
–
Non-current portion
–
16.2
–
24.3 24.3
Current portion
11.0
15.9
33.0
45.9
t otal
11.0
32.1
33.0
70.2
Trading derivatives are classified as a current asset or current liability. The full fair value of a hedging derivative is classified as a non-current asset or liability if the remaining maturity of the hedged item is more than 12 months and, as a current asset or current liability, if the maturity of the hedged item
Nordic countries
0.13%
115.1
0.10%
207.2
Asia
0.02%
84.6
0.07%
91.6
North America
0.21%
144.0
0.16%
213.9
Central Europe
0.06%
141.2
0.16%
162.7
Southern Europe
0.17%
169.3
0.05%
223.3
British Isles
0.10%
45.5
0.11%
51.7
Other markets
0.02%
2.1
0.00%
2.4
is less than 12 months. There was no ineffectiveness to be recorded from cash flow hedges in 2009 or 2008. The maximum exposure to credit risk on the balance sheet date is the fair value of the derivative instruments recognized as assets in the balance sheet. Gains and losses recognized in equity on forward foreign exchange contracts at December 31, 2009 will be released to the income statement
t otal trade receivables
0.13%
701.8
0.13%
952.8
at various dates between one month and 12 months from the balance sheet date. Gains and losses recognized in the hedging reserve in equity (Note 39) on interest rate swaps at December 31, 2009 will be continuously recognized in the income statement until the borrowing has been repaid (Note 42).
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 72
n otes to the Financial Statements
Interest rate swaps
At year-end, the Group had impaired and provided for uncertain trade receiv-
The nominal principal amounts of the Group’s outstanding interest-rate swap
ables. The amount of these provisions is SEK 29.4 M (33.1) at December 31,
contracts at year-end were SEK 424 M (614). At December 31, 2009, the
2009. The aging analysis of trade receivables that have been provided for
fixed interest rates in USD varied from 4.87% till 5.49%. The fixed interest
is shown below.
rates in SEK varied from 1.69% to 5.04%. The fixed interest rates in GBP
Age analysis, provisions for
were 4.6625%. The floating rates were 3 months and 6 months USD LIBOR,
receivables impairment
6 months GBP LIBOR and 3 months and 6 months STIBOR.
Trade receivables that
2009
2008
are not past due
0.6
1.8
Forward foreign exchange contracts
Less than 3 months
0.7
2.3
At December 31, 2009, the Group’s open forward foreign exchange con-
3 to 6 months
tracts had terms of between one month and one year.
More than six months
2.6
6.9
25.5
22.1
29.4
33.1
The notional principal amounts of the outstanding forward foreign t otal provisions for
exchange contracts at December 31, 2009 were SEK -133 M (-220).
receivables impairment
The hedged highly probable forecast transactions denominated in foreign currency are expected to occur at various dates during the next 12 months. Gains and losses recognized in the hedging reserve in equity (Note
The recognized amounts, per currency, are as follows for the Group’s trade
39) on forward foreign exchange contracts as of December 31, 2009 are
receivables:
recognized in the income statement in the period or periods during which the hedged forecast transaction affects the income statement, normally
Currency (corresponding value in SeK)
within 12 months from the balance sheet date.
SEK
40.7
79.8
EUR
348.2
471.4
n ote 32. t rade and other receivables Group 2009
2008
Trade and bills receivable
731.2
985.8
–
0.0
2009
2008
-29.4
-33.1
–
–
USD
127.9
215.3
Other currencies
185.0
186.2
t otal trade receivables
701.8
952.7
701.8
952.7
–
Movements on the Group’s provision for impairment of trade receivables are
Less: provisions for impairment
as follows:
t otal
2008
Parent Company
of trade receivables
2009
0.0
At January 1 Provisions for receivables impairment
2009
2008
33.1
30.3
9.9
0.3 -1.1
Unused amounts reversed for There is no concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables,
uncollectible receivables
-8.6
as the Group has a large number of customers that are internationally
Reclassifications
-3.6
–
dispersed.
Translation difference
-1.4
3.6
The Group has recognized a loss of SEK 5.0 M (7.1) for the impairment At December 31
of its trade receivables in 2009. The loss has been included in “Selling
29.4
33.1
costs” in the income statement. The fair value of trade receivables correThe creation and release of provisions for impaired receivables have been
sponds to the carrying amount. Trade receivables that are less than three months past due are not con-
included in “Selling costs” in the income statement. The other classes within
sidered impaired. At December 31, 2009, trade receivables in the amount
trade and other receivables do not contain impaired assets. The maximum
of SEK 228.4 M (304.8) were past due but not impaired. These relate to a
exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the fair value of each class
number of independent customers for whom there is no recent history of
of receivable mentioned above. The Group does not hold any collateral as
default. The aging analysis of these trade receivables is as follows:
security.
Age analysis of past due trade receivables
2009
2008
Less than 3 months
200.0
271.4
3 to 6 months
15.2
21.2
More than six months
13.2
12.2
n ote 33. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities Deferred taxes are valued using the nominal tax rate. Deferred income tax assets are recognized for tax loss carry-forwards to the extent that the realization of the related tax benefit through the future taxable profits is probable.
t otal past due trade receivables
228.4
304.8
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities in 2008 were not offset even if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets again current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxation authority. The amounts that could have been offset totaled SEK 27.9 M on December 31, 2008. In 2009, these amounts were offset in the balance sheet.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 7 3
n otes to the Financial Statements
The movement in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the year was as follows: Assets
2009
Fixed assets
Liabilities
2008
2009
n et
2008
2009
2008
1.3
1.2
9.2
12.2
7.9
11.0
13.3
11.9
19.9
26.1
6.6
14.2
Trade receivables
3.8
3.1
0.0
0.0
-3.8
-3.1
Restructuring reserves
0.0
0.1
–
–
0.0
-0.1
26.5
27.7
0.4
2.2
-26.1
-25.5
3.7
2.7
–
–
-3.7
-2.7
10.2
5.8
0.0
0.0
-10.2
-5.8
Inventories
Pension provisions Warranty risk reserve Loss-carry-forwards Untaxed reserves
–
–
23.9
23.9
23.9
23.9
13.8
13.6
7.2
2.8
-6.6
-10.8
liabilities
72.6
66.1
60.6
67.2
-12.0
Due within 1 year
65.8
60.9
30.1
32.3
-35.7
-28.6
6.8
5.2
30.5
34.9
23.7
29.7
liabilities
72.6
66.1
60.6
67.2
-12.0
1.1
Of which offset
-11.6
n et after offsetting
61.0
Other Deferred tax assets/
Due later than 1 year
1.1
Deferred tax assets/ –
-11.6
66.1
–
49.0
Balance
67.2
Jan. 1, Provisions for assets Restructuring reserves Pension provisions
– -12.0
– 1.1
Recognized
exchange
in the income
rate
Business
Dec. 31,
statement
differences
combinations
2009
2009
Balance
21.8
-9.8
-1.3
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
10.7 0.0
-25.5
-1.3
0.0
0.7
-26.1
Warranty risk reserve
-2.7
-0.9
-0.1
0.0
-3.7
Loss-carry-forwards
-5.8
-4.6
0.2
0.0
-10.2
Untaxed reserves
23.9
0.6
-0.6
0.0
23.9
Other
-10.5
3.5
0.4
0.0
-6.6
-1.3
0.7
t otal
1.1
-12.5
Balance Jan. 1,
Provisions for assets Restructuring reserves Pension provisions
2008
Recognized
exchange
in the income
rate
Business
statement
differences
combinations
-12.0 Balance Dec. 31, 2008
20.8
-4.8
5.8
0.0
-0.3
0.3
-0.1
0.0
21.8 -0.1
-27.7
3.9
-1.7
0.0
-25.5
Warranty risk reserve
-2.9
0.3
-0.1
0.0
-2.7
Loss-carry-forwards
-5.6
3.3
-3.5
0.0
-5.8
Untaxed reserves
24.9
-0.5
-0.5
0.0
23.9
Other
-9.6
1.1
-2.0
0.0
-10.5
t otal
-0.4
3.6
-2.1
0.0
1.1
Tax losses for which deferred tax assets are not recognized: Group
2009
2008
Tax losses whose utilization period is due Within one year
not certain that the Group will be able to utilize them for settlement against 0.2
1.1
Later than one year but within five years
30.0
4.2
Later than five years
17.1
34.5
t otal tax losses
47.3
39.8
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 74
Deferred tax losses have not been recognized for these items since it is future taxable profits within the next few years. The Parent Company has no unrecognized deferred tax assets.
n otes to the Financial Statements
n ote 34. n on-current receivables
The shares have a par (quota) value of SEK 10 each. All issued shares are Group
Parent Company
2009
2008
2009
2008
29.0
27.6
–
–
convertible debentures
9.0
8.9
–
–
Deposits
3.9
2.0
–
–
Other financial assets
3.7
5.9
0.3
0.3
45.6
44.4
0.3
0.3
fully paid. A specification of the changes in equity is found in this report under Group changes in equity.
Administration of own pension obligations Employee options and
t otal
n ote 39. o ther reserves o pening balance at January 1, 2008
h edging t ranslation reserve
reserve
t otal
2.1
-52.2
-50.1
Cash flow hedges – transfers through profit or loss
-22.6
–
5.9
–
5.9
–
214.0
214.0
Closing balance at December 31, 2008 -14.6
161.8
147.2
o pening balance at January 1, 2009
161.8
147.2
– tax effect Exchange rate differences in Group
-22.6
n ote 35. Inventories and work on contract Group
Parent Company
Work on contract
2009
2008
2009
Accrued expenses
113.2
131.8
14.9
3.0
25.3
25.9
–
–
Gradual revenue recognition
157.7
t otal
138.5
Inventories
2009
2008
617.1
736.4
0.0
1.2
-33.6
-31.5
–
–
Group
14.9
2008
3.0
Parent Company 2009
2008
-14.6
Cash flow hedges – transfers through profit or loss
5.2
–
5.2
– tax effect
-1.4
–
-1.4
–
-95.3
-95.3
66.5
55.7
Exchange rate differences in Group
Closing balance at December 31, 2009 -10.8
Value of inventories before obsolescence
n ote 40. u ntaxed reserves
Less: provision for impairment of inventories t otal
583.5
704.9
0.0
1.2
Parent Company depreciation and straight-line depreciation Inventory reserve
“Cost of goods sold” amounted to SEK 1,310.6 M (1,286.0).
2008
Cumulative difference between book Tax allocation reserves
The cost of raw material inventories recognized as expense and included in
2009
t otal
4.0
1.9
42.9
40.9
0.5
–
47.4
42.8
n ote 36. Prepaid expenses and accrued income Group
2009
Parent Company
2008
2009
2008
Prepaid rent
4.0
5.5
0.2
0.9
Prepaid insurance
3.3
3.2
0.3
0.1
Prepaid employee benefit expenses 6.6
5.7
0.1
–
Prepaid royalties and bonus income 0.2
–
–
–
Other items
11.8
18.4
0.4
1.4
t otal
25.9
32.8
1.0
2.4
n ote 37. Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term investments
2009
The Camfil Farr Group has internal cash pools in the following currencies: SEK, USD, GBP, DKK, NOK, CAD and EUR. The Group cash pool system has reduced the external credits of subsidiaries. Each company’s share of the Group cash pools is reported as an internal balance with the Parent Company, which is the company that has the external credit with a credit institution. The Parent Company has been granted overdraft facilities totaling SEK 171.7 M (178.4). Unutilized bank overdraft facilities totaled SEK 171.7 M (163.6) on the balance sheet date.
n ote 42. Borrowings
Group
n ote 41. Bank overdraft facilities
Parent Company
2008
2009
2008
1.8
0.4
–
–
Cash at bank and on hand
440.8
242.1
275.1
118.3
t otal
442.7
242.5
275.1
118.3
To limit the refinancing risk in the Group’s short-term financing and have a liquidity reserve, the Parent Company has signed several multi-currency revolving credit facilities in varying amounts and with varying maturities. There is a five-year facility starting April 30, 2007 in the amount of SEK 250 M and a facility in the amount of SEK 100 M that matures on May 2, 2011. In addition, there are two five-year credit facilities in the amount of SEK 450 M and SEK 200 M, respectively, which were signed on May 11 and May 9,
n ote 38. Share capital
2005. Negotiations are in progress with the Group’s banks to secure new
n umber of shares
A-shares
B-shares
t otal number
Number at 2008-01-01
1 422 414
9 956 896
11 379 310
Number at 2008-12-31
1 422 414
9 956 896
11 379 310
Number at 2009-12-31
1 422 414
9 956 896
11 379 310
facilities that will replace those that mature during 2010.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 7 5
n otes to the Financial Statements
Group Interest-bearing liabilities:
2009
2008
Parent Company
2009
Carrying
amounts
2008
n on-current Liabilities to credit institutions
2008
Parent Company
679.2
860.2
672.0
850.6
Convertible debenture loan
51.4
50.5
51.4
50.5
Non-current liabilities to credit institutions
Derivative financial instruments
16.2
24.3
16.2
24.3
Current liabilities to credit institutions
Other liabilities
12.6
2.4
–
–
Convertible debenture loan
108.5
112.4
–
–
t otal
1.0
0.7
–
–
Fair values
850.6
850.8
0.0
0.0
50.5
50.5
Provisions for pensions and similar obligations Other provisions
901.1
901.3
Fair values are based on discounted cash flows using a discount rate that t otal
868.9
1 050.5
739.6
925.4
is based on the interest rate estimated to be available to the Group on the balance sheet date. Regarding leasing liabilities, the carrying amount is
Group
Parent Company
2009
2008
2009
Current Liabilities to credit institutions
24.2
17.5
–
–
11.7
31.0
15.9
45.9
35.9
48.5
15.9
45.9
2009
904.8
1 099.0
755.5
2008
EUR
2.4
5.7
USD
173.7
228.8
SEK
504.8
548.4
73.9
145.3
754.8
928.2
Other currencies
t otal interest-bearing liabilities
The carrying amounts of the Group’s borrowings are denominated in the following currencies:
Derivative financial instruments t otal
considered to represent a reasonable approximation of the fair value.
2008
971.3 t otal
The Parent Company and the Group have no loans due for payment later Interest
than five years after the balance sheet date. As collateral for bank loans, the banks’ credit contracts are subject to
The Group’s bank borrowings mature until 2014 and carry an average
covenant clauses in which the Group has to meet certain key performance
effective interest rate coupon of 3.5% (4.6 %). There is also a convertible
indicators with regard to the interest coverage ratio and net debt-equity
debenture bond maturing in 2010 that carries an average effective interest
ratio.
rate of 0.9% (4.0%).
Fair values
The Group has the following undrawn borrowing facilities:
The carrying amounts and fair values of certain liabilities are as follows:
Carrying
amounts
Group Non-current liabilities to credit institutions
2009
2008
Floating rate
2009 Fair values
– Expires within one year
376.1
100.0
– Expires beyond one year
197.1
322.9
573.2
422.9
679.2
683.8
Current liabilities to credit institutions
24.2
24.2
Convertible debenture loan
51.4
51.4
t otal
The facilities expiring within one year are one-year credit facilities subject to review at various dates during the year.
t otal
754.8
759.4 Convertible debenture loan Since 2000, Camfil Farr has established several long-term incentive pro-
2009
Carrying
amounts
Parent Company Non-current liabilities to credit institutions Convertible debenture loan t otal
Fair values
grams for senior executives in the company. The purpose of these programs is to offer benefits in the form of long-term incentive programs tied to the company’s performance in order to attract, keep and motivate senior execu-
672.0
676.6
51.4
51.4
723.4
728.0
tives. The programs are designed so that incentives for key persons are aligned with the interests of the shareholders. Convertible debenture loan 2005-2010 On June 10, 2005, the Parent Company issued a convertible debenture loan to senior executives in a nominal amount of SEK 52 M. The loan is due five
2008
Carrying
amounts
Group Non-current liabilities to credit institutions
Fair values
years after the issue date and can be converted into shares, at the request of the holders, at a price of SEK 225 per share. The interest rate for the convertible loan is set at 12 months’ STIBOR less 0.5 percent.
The fair values of the liability portion and equity portion were deter-
860.2
860.4
Current liabilities to credit institutions
17.5
17.5
mined when the convertible debentures were issued. The fair value of the
Convertible debenture loan
50.5
50.1
liability portion, including in non-current liabilities, is determined using a market interest rate for an equivalent non-convertible bond. The remaining
t otal
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 76
928.2
928.0
amount is included in equity.
n otes to the Financial Statements
The convertible debentures are recognized in the balance sheet as follows:
Total pension costs recognized in the consolidated income statement are as
Nominal value of convertible debentures issued on June 10, 2005
follows:
51.8
Equity portion
-1.3
2009
Total costs for defined benefit plans Closing balance of liability portion in 2008
50.5
Total costs for defined contribution plans
o pening balance of liability portion on January 1, 2009
50.5
Costs for special employer's contribution
Interest expenses (Note 15)
0.9
Liability portion on December 31, 2009
51.4
n ote 43. Provisions for pensions and similar obligations Provisions for pensions
and similar obligations
2009
Defined benefit pension plans Post-employee benefits
Provisions at the end of the period
t otal pension cost
56.1
4.3
3.6
78.0
59.7
Post-
Defined benefit
employment
4.2
3.5
108.5
73.7
79.7
29.2
50.6
2008
30.1
5.5
68.0
Costs are distributed in the consolidated income statement as follows:
74.2
Capitalized defined contribution pension plan under own management
and tax on return
2008
5.7
pension plans 2009
benefits
2008
2009
2008
Cost of goods sold
-0.8
-1.6
-0.1
0.0
Selling costs
-0.8
-1.4
-0.1
0.0
Administrative expenses
-0.3
-0.9
0.0
-0.2
Financial items
-3.4
-1.4
-0.2
0.0
t otal
-5.3
-5.3
-0.4
-0.2
112.4
Defined benefit pension plans The Group operates defined benefit pension plans in France, Germany, the
The amounts recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position
United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands and Austria
are determined as follows: Post-
based on employee pensionable remuneration and length of service. Pension insurance with Alecta and Collectum
The obligations for retirement pensions and family pensions for salaried
workers in Sweden are secured through pension insurance with Alecta. In
Current service cost
accordance with a statement by the Swedish Financial Reporting Board
Interest cost
(UFR 3), this is a multi-employer defined benefit plan. For the 2009 fiscal
Return on plan assets
year, the Group has not had access to information that would enable the
Net actuarial losses (+) and
reporting of this plan as a defined benefit plan. The pension plan in accord-
gains (-) recognized for
ance with ITP is secured through insurance with Alecta and is therefore
the year
reported as a defined contribution plan. Fees in 2009 for pension insur-
Defined benefit pension plans 2009
employment benefits
2008
2009
-3.4
-5.2
-0.2
2008 -0.2
-12.3
-10.1
-0.2
-0.1
8.9
8.6
0.0
0.0
1.5
1.4
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-5.3
-5.3
-0.4
-0.2
ance signed with Alecta and Collectum amount to SEK 7.4 M (6.3). Alecta’s surplus can be distributed to policyholders and/or the insured. At year-end
t otal
2009, Alecta’s surplus in the form of its collective funding ratio was 141 percent (112 percent) and consists of the market value of Alecta’s assets
The amounts recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position
as a percentage of its insurance commitments, which is not in agreement
are determined as follows:
2009
Present value of fund obligations
226.0
201.7
Plan for severance benefit after termination of employment
Fair value of plan assets
-140.3
-122.0
The Group operates plans for severance benefits after termination of
with IAS 19.
85.7
2008
79.7
employment in which the employees have the right to post-employment benefits. These benefits are based on the employee’s final salary and years
Present value of unfunded obligations
6.7
3.5
of service. This plan exists primarily in Italy and Austria.
Pension plan under own management
30.1
29.2
Unrecognized actuarial losses/gains
-14.0
0.0
Defined contribution plan under own management In the United States, there is a defined contribution pension plan under the
n et liability in balance sheet
108.5
112.4
company’s own management. Pension assets for this plan are booked as non-current financial receivables (Note 34). There is also a defined contribution plan in Norway for a few senior executives. Plan assets Pension plan assets include shares and interest-bearing assets. The actual return on plan assets was SEK 8.9 M (8.6).
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 7 7
n otes to the Financial Statements
The movement in defined benefit obligations for the year was as follows: Defined benefit pension plans 2009
Beginning of the year Service cost for the year Interest cost Contributions by plan participants Benefits paid Acquisitions Actuarial gains (-) and losses (+)
Exchange rate differences in foreign plans
Post- employ- ment benefits 2009
Were the discount rate used to increase/decrease by 0.5 percentage points
Defined contribution pension plans 2009
201.7
3.5
29.2
3.4
0.2
0.9
12.4
0.2
–
0.3
–
–
-10.4
–
–
2.8
–
–
from management’s estimates, the carrying amount of pension obligations would be an estimated SEK 15.2 M lower or SEK 16.2 M higher. Plan assets consist of the following:
2009
2008
Shares
69.5
50%
54.9
45%
Interest-bearing securities
28.7
20%
29.4
24%
Other
42.1
30%
37.7
31%
t otal
140.3
100%
122.0
100%
18.4
0.1
–
Investments are well diversified, such that the failure of any single invest-
0.3
-0.1
–
ment would not have a material impact on the overall level of assets. The largest proportion of assets is invested in equities. The Group believes that
n et liability at end of the year
228.9
3.9
30.1
equities offer the best returns over the long term with an acceptable level of risk.
The movement in defined benefit obligations for the year was as follows: Defined Defined Post- contri benefit employ- bution pension ment pension plans benefits plans 2008 2008 2008 Beginning of the year Service cost for the year Interest cost
209.1
2.9
33.6
4.6
0.2
-8.5 –
The estimated return on plan assets was determined by considering the estimated returns available on the assets underlying the current investment policy. Estimated yields on fixed interest investments are based on gross redemption yields as at the balance sheet date. Estimated returns on equity and property investments reflect long-term real rates of return experienced in the respective markets. Contributions to post-employment benefit plans for the year ending December 31, 2010 are expected to amount to SEK 2.2 M.
10.9
0.2
Contributions by plan participants
0.4
–
–
At December 31
Benefits paid
-9.1
–
–
Present value of defined
-14.5
-0.2
–
0.3
0.4
4.1
Actuarial gains (-) and losses (+) Exchange rate differences in foreign plans
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
benefit obligations
232.7
205.2
Fair value of plan assets
140.3
122.0
212.0
212.0
226.8
149.8
128.3
92.4
135.2
83.2
62.2
83.7
91.6
–
–
–
–
-6.6
gains/losses
-14.0
0.0
17.9
-9.0
-8.2
n et liability
78.4
83.2
80.1
74.7
76.8
Deficit in the plan n et liability at end of the year
201.7
3.5
29.2
Unrecognized past service cost
The movement in the fair value of plan assets for the year was as follows: Defined benefit pension plans
2009
2008
Beginning of the year
122.0
149.8
8.9
8.6
Actuarial gains (+) and losses (-)
7.5
-31.1
Employer contributions
9.7
10.3
Estimated return on plan assets
Employee contributions
Unrecognized actuarial
n ote 44. o ther provisions
0.3
0.4
-10.7
-8.6
employ-
Acquisitions (Note 49 )
0.0
0.0
Restructuring
ment
commit-
o ther
Exchange rate differences in foreign plans
2.6
-7.4
reserve
benefits
ments
items
t otal
10.6
42.0
31.8
Benefits paid
At January 1, 2009
PostWarranty
0.4
–
31.0
– Additional provisions
–
4.0
23.0
4.8
– Unused amounts reversed
–
–
-5.2
-2.0
-7.2
Important actuarial assumptions on the balance sheet date (expressed as
Exchange rate differences
–
-0.1
-1.3
-0.4
-1.8
weighted average):
Utilized during the year
-0.2
-0.1
-9.7
-3.3
-13.3
At December 31, 2009
0.2
3.8
37.8
9.7
51.5
end of the year
140.3
122.0
Charged to consolidated income statement
There are no plan assets for post-employment benefits.
u nited
Kingdom
Canada
n orway
Discount rate
5.50
6.50
Estimated return on plan assets
6.50
Future annual salary increases
4.30
Inflation
3.30
Rest of world
4.50
5.50
6.50
5.50 4.00
4.50 3.5*)
Of which:
4.00
–
2.5
34.0
3.9
40.4
2.50
1.50
2.00
Current portion
0.2
1.3
3.8
5.8
11.1
At December 31, 2009
0.2
3.8
37.8
9.7
51.5
*) The exception is Austria, where future annual salary increases are assumed to be 2.75%.
Assumptions regarding future mortality experience are set based on actuarial advice, published statistics and experience in each territory.
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 78
Non-current portion
n otes to the Financial Statements
Restructuring reserve
At January 1, 2008
n ote 47. Contingent liabilities
Postemploy- ment benefits
Warranty commit- ments
Group
o ther items
Parent Company
t otal
2009
2008
2009
2008
Warranty commitments
249.2
279.6
215.7
195.8
t otal
249.2
279.6
215.7
195.8
194.8
172.7
1.5
2.1
27.0
9.8
40.4
–
–
16.9
3.3
20.2
– Unused amounts reversed -0.4
–
-5.2
-2.2
-7.8
Of which contingent liabilities on
Exchange rate differences
–
–
3.2
1.4
4.6
behalf of other Group companies
Utilized during the year
-0.7
-2.1
-10.9
-1.7
-15.4
At December 31, 2008
0.4
–
31.0
10.6
42.0
–
–
29.2
4.9
34.1
0.4
–
1.8
5.7
7.9
Charged to consolidated income statement – Additional provisions
–
–
Warranty commitments are made primarily within the gas turbine segment.
n ote 48. Adjustments for items not included in cash flow
Of which: Non-current portion Current portion At December 31, 2008
0.4
–
31.0
10.6
42.0
Group
Parent Company
2009
2008
Depreciation and amortization
129.5
113.9
4.2
2.3
8.7
-16.1
–
-6.5
Provisions
2009
2008
Interest portion in pension Warranty commitments
expenses according to IAS 19
-12.5
-10.0
–
–
In certain cases the Group provides guarantees for projects that involve
Return on pension plan assets
8.9
8.6
–
–
measures to replace or repair defect products. The provisions are based on
Derivative financial instruments
the estimated probability of the warranty commitments. New provisions for
recognized as hedges
5.2
-22.6
4.4
-18.3
warranty commitments were made during the year as the project-based gas
Other
0.0
3.4
–
0.0
turbine division expanded its business. t otal
139.8
77.2
8.6
-22.5
Other items Other items include provisions for future legal disputes. In the Group there
n ote 49. Acquisitions
is an ongoing large legal dispute concerning a product delivery made in 2004. In the Group’s opinion, it is not likely that this dispute will result in the
On March 4, 2009, Camfil Farr acquired Mecke Klima GmbH in Austria. The
payment of any major damages. Therefore, no provision has been made for
company was previously Camfil Farr’s agent in the country. In 2009, Mecke
this dispute.
Klima’s sales totaled SEK 42 M. Information about purchased net assets and goodwill:
n ote 45. Accrued expenses and deferred income Group Accrued interest expenses
2009
The amounts have been estimated using the Group’s accounting principles.
Parent Company
2008
2009
2008
1.7
9.3
1.9
9.2
185.0
188.3
19.9
17.7
9.9
8.7
–
–
14.1
12.9
0.2
1.5
Accrued costs for finished projects 15.1
19.7
–
–
64.2
65.6
1.5
1.3
290.0
304.5
23.5
Accrued personnel expenses Accrued commission expenses Accrued consulting fees Other accrued expenses and deferred income
Purchase price Cash payment
t otal purchase price
1.9
20.7
Fair value of acquired net assets Goodwill
t otal
18.8
Direct costs in connection with the acquisition
-3.0
17.7
29.7 Fair value
n ote 46. Pledged assets
Intangible assets Group
2009
2008
Acquired recognized value
17.7
Parent Company
Property, plant and equipment
0.8
2009
Inventories
1.6
1.6
10.8
10.8
2008
Other current assets
For own liabilities and provisions
Provisions
-2.1
Chattel mortgages
1.2
3.2
–
–
Current liabilities
-8.1
t otal
1.2
3.2
–
–
t otal purchase price
For other liabilities
20.7
0.8
-8.1
Cash and cash equivalents in the No chattel mortgages are pledged as assets.
acquired company
-2.4
t otal cash flow attributable to investment in subsidary
18.3
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 7 9
n otes to the Financial Statements
Effect of investments for the year on cash and cash equivalents:
Intangible
Investments for the year
Purchases and sales were on market terms. t angible
-17.7
-163.0
–
5.2
Financed with financial leases
Farr Inc. in Canada rents a building used for its operations from Silvan Hills Holding, which is owned by Michael Dobbs, sales manager in Canada for Comfort Air and Clean Processes.
or amortization payments Consolidated value of facilities in
Kaare Rustad AS rents premises in Oslo and Trondheim from Rustad Eiendom AS, which is owned by the former owners of Kaare Rustad AS. One
new subsidiaries
17.7
0.8
effect on cash and cash equivalents from investments for the year
of these owners is an employee of Kaare Rustad AS. o perating liabilities attributable to related parties:
0.0
-157.0
Group
2009
2008
Trosa Stadshotell AB
–
0.0
t otal
–
0.0
Payment of liabilities attributable to previous investments
–
2.0
effect on cash and cash equivalents in investing activities
Remuneration paid to senior executives 0.0
-155.0 Principles Fees are paid to the Chairman of the board and board members in accord-
n ote 50. Related party transactions
ance with the decision of the Annual General Meeting. No fees are paid to union representatives.
Intra-Group purchases and sales
Remuneration paid to the Managing Director and other senior executives
In the Parent Company, 100 (100) percent of sales for the year consisted of sales to Group subsidiaries. No purchases were made by the Parent
consists of basic salary, variable salary, other benefits, pension and financial
Company from Group companies.
instruments. “Other senior executives” in the Parent Company refers to executive vice
Purchases and sales between Group companies are made on an arm’s length basis. The internal price is based on the actual production cost plus
presidents and the Group’s vice presidents of marketing and production,
a mark-up. When setting the mark-up, business risks and market prices are
who together comprise Group Management together with the President. The distribution between basic salary and variable salary is to be in pro-
taken into account, among other factors.
portion to the executive’s responsibilities and authority. Variable salary for the President has been set at a maximum of 125 percent of his bonus based
Sales to related parties Group
2009
2008
Jungfrutomten AB
0.0
0.0
t otal
0.0
0.0
on goals. The bonus based on goals corresponds to 50 percent of basic salary. For other senior executives, the bonus based on goals varies between two months of salary and 50 percent of basic salary. Variable salary is based on the outcome in relation to individually set performance goals. The Group basically has only defined contribution pension plans for senior executives. The pension expense refers to the cost that has impacted
Purchases of goods and services from related parties: Group
2009
2008
profit for the year. The retirement age for the President is 60 years. The
Industriekonomi Eric Giertz AB
0.2
0.0
pension premium is to amount to 35 percent of pension-based salary.
Resolvator
0.0
0.0
Pension-based salary consists of basic salary and the variable salary paid in
Åda Krog & Hotel
0.1
0.0
the most recent year. The retirement age for other senior executives varies
Trosa Stadshotell AB
0.9
1.7
between 60 and 65 years.
Quickbutton Badges AB
0.0
–
Silvan Hills Holding
3.1
3.5
Rustad Eiendom AS
4.4
–
t otal
8.7
A mutual six-month term of notice applies between the President and the company. If the company terminates his employment, the President will receive severance pay corresponding to 18 months of salary. Severance pay is not deducted from other income. If the President resigns, he receives no
5.2
severance pay. Severance pay for other senior executives varies between 6 and 18 months of salary.
Parent Company/Group 2009
Compensation Fees for assign- for redeemed Basic ments and other subscription remuneration remuneration warrants
Social security contributions, excl. pension costs
Pension costs
Compensation from other Group companies
t otal
Jan Eric Larson, Executive Chairman
3.0
–
–
1.0
0.0
–
4.0
Johan Markman, Vice Chairman
2.0
–
–
0.6
0.0
–
2.6
CW Ros, Director
0.2
–
–
0.0
–
–
0.2
C Zetterberg, Director
0.2
–
–
0.1
–
–
0.3
Erik Giertz, Director
0.2
–
–
0.1
–
0.1
0.4
Mats Lönnqvist, Director
0.3
–
–
0.1
–
–
0.4
President and CEO
6.0
–
–
2.4
2.0
–
10.4
Other senior executives (3)
8.1
–
–
2.4
2.1
–
12.6
20.0
–
–
6.7
4.1
0.1
30.9
t otal
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 80
n otes to the Financial Statements
Parent Company/Group 2008
Compensation Fees for assign- for redeemed Basic ments and other subscription remuneration remuneration warrants
Social security contributions, excl. pension costs
Pension costs
Compensation from other Group companies
t otal
Jan Eric Larson, Executive Chairman
3.0
–
–
1.0
–
–
4.0
Johan Markman, Vice Chairman
2.0
–
–
0.6
–
–
2.6
CW Ros, Director
0.2
–
–
0.0
–
–
0.2
C Zetterberg, Director
0.2
–
–
0.0
–
–
0.2
Erik Giertz, Director
0.2
0.1
–
0.1
–
0.0
0.4
Mats Lönnqvist, Director
0.2
0.0
–
0.1
–
–
0.3
President and CEO
5.1
0.1
10.2
0.9
2.1
–
18.4
Other senior executives (3)
7.7
0.3
9.3
2.6
1.7
–
21.6
18.6
0.5
19.5
5.3
3.8
0.0
47.7
t otal
Basic remuneration for fiscal year 2009 includes expensed bonuses, which are paid in 2010. Company car benefits and private health care insurance are included in other remuneration. The company does not have pension costs for board directors.
n ote 53. Definitions of key ratios EBIT margin (operating margin) Earnings before financial items, appropriations and taxes, as a percentage of sales.
Preparation and decision-making process for remuneration The formal work plan for the board states that remuneration paid to the President and Executive Vice President is to be proposed by a working committee. This committee consists of the Chairman, the Vice Chairman and two other board directors. Since the Annual General Meeting in 2009, these committee members have been Jan Eric Larson, Johan Markman, Mats Lönnqvist and Eric Giertz.
EBT margin (profit margin before tax) Earnings before tax, as a percentage of sales. Equity ratio Equity as a percentage of total assets. Interest-bearing net debt Interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents and other interest-
Audit Committee Board members serving on the Audit Committee during 2009 included Johan Markman, Vice Chairman, and Mats Lönnqvist, Director.
bearing receivables, such as derivative financial instruments. Debt-equity ratio (gearing ratio) Interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents as a percentage
Financial instruments The President and other senior executives hold the following number of convertible debentures within the company’s program: Number of convertible debentures President
10 000
Other senior executives (3)
17 000
t otal
27 000
of equity. Capital employed Total assets less non-interest-bearing liabilities including non-interest-bearing provisions. Average capital employed is calculated as capital employed at January 1 plus capital employed at December 31 divided by two. Return on capital employed Profit after financial items plus financial expenses as a percentage of average capital employed.
Note 42 describes the terms and conditions of the program.
Return on equity
n ote 51. events after the balance sheet date
Profit after tax as a percentage of average equity. Average equity is
No events having a material effect on reported financial information or their underlying estimates have occurred after the balance sheet date.
calculated as equity at January 1 plus equity at December 31 divided by two. Investments
n ote 52. exchange rates
Investments in intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
The following exchange rates were used when preparing the consolidated year-end accounts: Rate on Average Currency
Rate on
balance
rate
sheet date
USD
7.6457
7.1363
EUR
10.6213
10.2752
CAD
6.1684
6.3025
Average Currency
balance
rate
sheet date
GBP 11.9260
11.5037
CHF
6.0586
7.3455
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 8 1
The income statement and balance sheet were presented for adoption by the Annual General Meeting on March 19, 2010. Trosa, March 19, 2010
Jan Eric Larson
Arne Karlsson
Johan Markman
EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
Carl Wilhelm Ros
Eric Giertz
Mats Lönnqvist
VICE CHAIRMAN
Christer Zetterberg
Rolf Wikström
Alan O’Connell
EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVE
PRESIDENT AND CEO
Our audit report was submitted on March 19, 2010
Carina Åkesson AUTHORISED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
Bertil Johanson AUTHORISED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
AUDITORS' REPORT
t o the Annual Meeting of the shareholders of Camfil AB Corporate identity number 556230-1266
We have audited the annual accounts, the consolidated accounts,
basis for our opinion concerning discharge from liability, we exam-
the accounting records and the administration of the Board of
ined significant decisions, actions taken and circumstances of the
Directors and the President of Camfil AB for the year 2009. (The
company in order to be able to determine the liability, if any, to the
company’s annual accounts and the consolidated accounts are
company of any board member or the President. We also examined
included in the printed version on pages 34-81). The Board of
whether any board member or the President has, in any other way,
Directors and the President are responsible for these accounts and
acted in contravention of the Companies Act, the Annual Accounts
the administration of the company as well as for the application of
Act or the Articles of Association. We believe that our audit provides
the Annual Accounts Act when preparing the annual accounts and
a reasonable basis for our opinion set out below.
the application of international financial reporting standards IFRS as
The annual accounts have been prepared in accordance with
adopted by the EU and the Annual Accounts Act when preparing the
the Annual Accounts Act and give a true and fair view of the com-
consolidated accounts. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
pany’s financial position and results of operations in accordance with
on the annual accounts, the consolidated accounts and the adminis-
generally accepted accounting principles in Sweden. The consoli-
tration based on our audit.
dated accounts have been prepared in accordance with international
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted
financial reporting standards IFRS as adopted by the EU and the
auditing standards in Sweden. Those standards require that we
Annual Accounts Act and give a true and fair view of the Group’s
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance that the
financial position and results of operations. The statutory administra-
annual accounts and the consolidated accounts are free of mate-
tion report is consistent with the other parts of the annual accounts
rial misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
and the consolidated accounts.
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the accounts.
We recommend to the annual meeting of shareholders that the
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
income statement and balance sheet of the Parent Company and
and their application by the Board of Directors and the President
the income statement and the statement of financial position of the
and significant estimates made by the Board of Directors and the
Group be adopted, that the profit of the Parent Company be dealt
President when preparing the annual accounts and consolidated
with in accordance with the proposal in the administration report
accounts as well as evaluating the overall presentation of informa-
and that the members of the Board of Directors and the President
tion in the annual accounts and the consolidated accounts. As a
be discharged from liability for the financial year.
Stockholm, March 19, 2010
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 82
Carina Åkesson
Bertil Johanson
AUTHORIZED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
AUTHORIZED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
Group Management
From left:
Alan O’Connell Chief Executive Officer, Camfil Group, President, Camfil AB, employed by Camfil Farr in 1983. Johan Ryrberg Chief Financial Officer, Camfil Group, Executive Vice President, Camfil AB, employed by Camfil Farr in 1995. Alain Bérard Vice President Sales and Marketing, Camfil Farr Group, Managing Director Camfil España, employed by Camfil Farr in 1995.
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 8 3
B o a rd o f D i re c t o r s o f Camfil A B a n d C e o o f t h e C a m f i l Farr Group
Jan eric Larson, born 1947.
Carl Wilhelm Ros, born 1941.
Executive Chairman. Elected to Camfil’s board
Elected to Camfil’s board in 1999. Chairman
in 1983. Chairman, Swede Ship Marine.
of Martin Olsson. Board member, INGKA (IKEA
Board member, Nederman Holding,
Holding), Anders Wilhelmsen o Co. AS, Bisnode
Trosa Stadshotell, Sweden;
and SEB, among other companies. Member of
Kaare A Rustad A/S, Norway; and various
the Royal Academy of Engineering Sciences.
Camfil Farr Group companies.
Holds 3,500 convertible debentures.*
Holds 2,965,000 shares.
Johan Markman, born 1949.
Mats Lönnqvist, born 1954.
Vice Chairman. Elected to Camfil’s board in
Elected to Camfil’s board in 2000.
1983. Chairman, Atteviks Bil, Trosa Stadshotell,
Deputy President and CFO, SAS Group.
Quickbutton. Managing Director, Jungfrutomten.
Chairman, Intellecta. Board member, Bordsjö
Board member, various Camfil Group subsidiaries
Skogar, Ledstiernan, Ovacon, Resolvator,
and other companies.
Spendrups Bryggeri, Telge Kraft, A/S Det
Holds 2,460,000 shares.
Østasiatiske Kompagni and other companies. Holds 3,500 convertible debentures.*
Arne Karlsson, born 1958.
Alan o ’Connell, born 1957.
Elected to Camfil’s board in 2004.
President and CEO of the Camfil Farr Group
President and CEO of Ratos. Chairman SNS,
since 2001. Board member, various
(Studieförbundet Näringsliv och Samhälle),
Camfil Farr companies.
Board member, Bonniers.
Holds 10,000 convertible debentures*.
Member of Sweden's Securities Council (Aktiemarknadsnämnden).
eric Giertz, born 1949.
Rolf Wikström, born 1946.
Elected to Camfil’s board in 1992. Professor
Employee representative on the board since
in Industrial Economics and Management at
2001. Employee representative on the board
the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) and
of Camfil Svenska AB.
Dean of KTH Business Liaison. Chairman, KTH Holding and KTH Executive School. Board member, Einar Mattsson Byggnads. Member of the Royal Academy of Engineering Sciences. Holds 3,500 convertible debentures.*
Christer Zetterberg, born 1941. Elected to Camfil’s board in 1998. Chairman Boo-Forssjö. Board member, Nike Hydraulics, Svensk Bilprovning, Swedship and
Deputy Board Members Henrik Joelsson, born 1969. Dan Larson, born 1980. Erik Markman, born 1978. Christer Stavström, born 1951 (employee representative).
L E Lundberg-företagen. Member of the Royal Academy of Engineering Sciences. Holds 3,500 convertible debentures.*
C A M F I L FA R R 2009 / 84
*One convertible debenture is equal to one share upon conversion.
F i v e - year S u m m a r y – C a m f i l F a r r G r o u p
SeK M (see n ote 53 for definitions)
2009
2008
2007
2006
Income statement Net sales
2005
4 503
4 361
4 115
3 763
3 083
Operating income
417
400
352
279
290
Profit after financial items
376
356
313
246
265
Tax
-112
-109
-77
-62
-79
Profit for the year
264
248
236
184
186
Balance sheet Goodwill and other intangible assets
896
913
792
782
664
Property, plant and equipment
809
842
711
622
620
Financial assets
107
111
112
99
102
Inventories
583
705
625
531
459
Cash and cash equivalents
443
243
326
262
215
Other non-current assets
826
1 082
892
838
713
Assets
3 664
equity
3 895
3 458
3 134
2 773 1 312
1 931
1 841
1 498
1 330
Interest-bearing liabilities
905
1 099
1 051
983
795
Interest-free liabilities
828
955
909
821
666
equity and liabilities
3 664
3 895
3 458
3 134
2 773
Cash flow Cash flow from operating activities
617
210
306
241
174
Cash flow from investing activities
-149
-186
-243
-396
-144
Cash flow from financing activities
-244
-138
-7
213
1
Cash flow for the period
225
-114
56
58
31
Key ratios Operating margin, EBIT
9.3%
9.2%
8.6%
7.4%
9.4%
Profit margin before tax, EBT
8.4%
8,0%
7.6%
6.5%
8.6% 48%
Equity ratio
53%
47%
43%
42%
Interest-bearing net liabilities
410
789
666
676
531
Net debt-equity ratio (gearing ratio)
21%
43%
44%
51%
41%
Return on capital employed
17.4%
17.0%
16.3%
15.1%
18.4%
Return on equity
13.9%
14.8%
16.7%
14.1%
15.1%
163
188
260
357
205
3 249
3 321
3 192
2 949
2 693
Investments Employees (average for the year)
C A M F I L FA R R 2 0 0 9 / 8 5
C A M F I L FA R R 2008 / 86
...Camfil Farr is the leader in clean air technology and air filter production. Camfil Farr has its own product development, R&D and world-wide local representation. Our overall quality goal is to develop, produce and market products and services of such quality that we aim to exceed our customers’ expectations. We see our activities and products as an expression of our quality. To reach a level of total quality it is necessary to establish an internal work environment where all Camfil Farr employees can succeed together. This means an environment characterised by openness, confidence and good business understanding.
www.camfilfarr.com FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT YOUR NEAREST CAMFIL FARR OFFICE. YOU WILL FIND THEM ON OUR WEBSITE.
Camfil AB, Sveavägen 56E, SE-111 34 STOCKHOLM, Sweden. Phone: + 46 8 545 12 500. Fax: + 46 8 24 96 50.
Artwork: Ymer Reklambyrå AB. Text: Thorn PR Sweden and Camfil Farr. Photos. Lars Clason, Folio, Fotolia, Getty Images. Printer: Trosa Tryckeri AB, Sweden. ©Camfil Farr
O n world standards...