ANALYZING YOUR CASH FLOW, INVESTMENT POLICY AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN TODAY’S TODAY S ECONOMY September 13, 2010 Presented by: Kenneth Schiebel, CFA Managing Director & Sr. Portfolio Manager PFM Asset Management LLC PFM Asset Management LLC 77 West Port Plaza, Suite 220 St. Louis, MO 63146 (314) 878-5000 www.pfm.com
Presenters & Representatives
PFM
Kenneth Schiebel, CFA Managing Director & Sr. Portfolio manager (717) 232-2723
[email protected]
Ken Schiebel leads a team of portfolio managers, traders and research staff responsible for the management of $19 billion in separate account portfolios. His team manages custom designed high quality portfolios for cities, counties, self-insurance organizations, school districts, state and local government agencies, and other not-for-profits. These funds include operating funds, capital reserves and municipal bond proceeds.
Maria Altomare Managing Director (314)-878-5000 Ext 222
[email protected]
Maria Altomare manages PFM’s St. Louis office. She assists public entities in Missouri, Nebraska, Wyoming and Kansas with cash management services, including individual portfolios, local government investment pools, fixed income products and bond proceeds investments. fixed-income investments Ms. Altomare also serves as national sales representative for purchasing card products and services. She has over 25 years experience and prides herself in providing her clients with excellent customer service.
Mark Barry Senior Managing Consultant (314)-878-5000 Ext 223
[email protected]
Mark Barry is a Senior Managing Consultant in PFM’’s St. Louis office. Mr. Barry assists public entities in Missouri with cash management services, including the marketing of individual portfolios, investment pools, fixed-income products and bond p p proceeds investment. In addition, Mr. Barry serves as a sales representative for purchasing card products and services.
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
1
Agenda
PFM
I Developing an Investment Policy I. II. Using Cash Flow Analysis III. Market Update IV Investment IV. I t t Opportunities O t iti in i the th Current C t Market M k t V. Update on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
2
I. Developing an Investment Policy
The Investment Policy Document I.
PFM
Scope
II. Objectives MODEL INVESTMENT POLICY
FOR POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI
– – –
Safety Liquidity Yield
III. Standards of Care IV. Investment Transaction V Suitable V. S it bl and dA Authorized th i d IInvestments t t VI. Investment Parameters VII Reporting VII.
December 3, 1998 Appendix A Page 1 of 11
VIII.Policy Considerations IX. Additional Attachments
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
4
Defining Scope •
PFM
To what funds does it apply? – General Funds – Reserves – Bond Proceeds – Retirement Funds
•
Applies to both Internal and External Management – Define role – Name members – List responsibilities
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
5
Investment Objectives •
PFM
Safety – Preservation of Capital – Legal Compliance – Risk Management or Mitigation • Credit risk and interest rate risk
•
Liquidity – Ability to meet payment obligations – Expected vs. unexpected
•
Yield – Secondary S d tto safety f t and d liquidity li idit – Obtain a “market rate of return” – Earn a “fair return relative to the risk being assumed”
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
6
Standards of Care & Investment Transactions •
PFM
Standards of Care – “Prudent Prudent Person Person” standard – Ethics and conflicts of interest – Delegation of authority • Designated investment officials • External manager
•
I Investment t t Transactions T ti – Authorized dealers • Primary dealers – Internal controls – Delivery vs. payment – Competitive C titi shopping h i
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
7
Suitable and Authorized Investments •
Permitted investment types (e.g. Treasury, Agency, CP)
•
For each type, yp specify: p y
PFM
– Maximum maturity – Minimum credit quality – Maximum sector allocation – Maximum per issuer – Collateral requirements •
List prohibited investment types
•
Collateralization
•
Consider nature of funds
•
C Consider id capabilities biliti off staff t ff
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
8
Reporting •
PFM
Complete information – Monthly and quarterly
•
Full transparency
•
Market valuation – Identify problems early
•
P f Performance reporting ti – Feedback loop – Re-assess objectives – Review portfolio structure
•
Recheck ratings
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
9
Formal Adoption of Policy •
Initial adoption by governing body
•
Annual review and update
PFM
ԟ Changes in personnel ԟ Changes to statutes ԟ Changes in objectives ԟ Changes in market conditions
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
10
Missouri State Treasurer’s Investment Guidelines Your Investment Missouri Virginia CodePolicy Guidelines U.S. Treasuries Sector Allocation I Issuer Limit Li it Maximum Maturity
Your Investment Missouri Virginia Policy Code Guidelines
100% none 5 years
Collateralized Repurchase Agreements Sector Allocation I Issuer Limit Li it Maximum Maturity
Bulleted Federal Agencies Sector Allocation Issuer Limit Maximum Maturity
60% none 5 years
Bankers' Acceptances Sector Allocation Issuer Limit Maximum Maturity
Callable Federal Agencies Sector Allocation Issuer Limit Maximum Maturity
30% none 5 years
Collateralized Certificates of Deposit Sector Allocation Issuer Limit Maximum Maturity
Commercial Paper Sector Allocation Issuer Limit Maximum Maturity
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
PFM
50% none 5 years
30% 5% 180 days
100% none 5 years
30% 5% 180 days
11
II. Using Cash Flow Analysis
Benefits of Cash Flow Forecasting
PFM
• Ensure adequate liquidity • Enhance cash management practices • Help design investment program ԟ Potentially increase amounts available for investment ԟ May allow for longer maturity investments ԟ Help p with budgeting g g investment income • Early warning system ԟ Revenue shortfall ԟ Expenditures exceed budget
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
13
The Building Blocks
PFM
• Identify cash flow components • Identify data sources • Determine degree of certainty/predictability • Accumulate historical data • Develop a cash flow forecast • Compare forecast to actual results
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
14
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
03 Jan-0 Aug‐10 0
Oct-02 May‐10 0
Jul-02 Feb‐10 02
Apr-02 Nov‐09 9
Jan-0 02 Aug‐09 9
01 Oct-0 May‐09 9
Jul-01 Feb‐09 9
Apr-0 01 Nov‐08 8
Peaks
Jan-0 01 Aug‐08 8
40 000 000 40,000,000
00 Oct-0 May‐08 8
Jul-00 Feb‐08 8
Apr-0 00 Nov‐07 7
Jan-0 00 Aug‐07 7
99 Oct-9 May‐07 7
35,000,000
Jul-99 Feb‐07 7
Apr-99 Nov‐06 6
Jan-9 99 Aug‐06 6
Macro Forecasting Process PFM
Analysis of Historical Monthly Cash Flows
Troughs
30,000,000
25 000 000 25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
15
Cash Flow Seasonality
PFM
• Investment balances often show strong seasonality over time S Seasonal l Factors F t January February y March April May June July August S September b October November D December b © 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
94% 93% 94% 96% 116% 102% 96% 97% 96% 99% 118% 98%
Lowest Month
Highest Month
16
Computing a Growth Factor
PFM
Analysis of Historical Monthly Cash Flows 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000
Historic Monthlyy Balance
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
Jan-03 Aug‐10
Oct-02 May‐10
Jul-02 Feb‐10
Apr-02 Nov‐09
Jan-02 Aug‐09
Oct-01 May‐09
Jul-01 Feb‐09
Apr-01 Nov‐08
Oct-00 May‐08
Jul-00 Feb‐08
Apr-00 Nov‐07
Aug‐07
Oct-99 May‐07
Jul-99 Feb‐07
Apr-99 Nov‐06
Aug‐06
Jan-99
5,000,000
Jan-01 Aug‐08
Average Monthly Increase: $205,118 Historic Annual Growth Rate: 9.9%
Average g Portfolio Growth
17
Balance Projections
PFM
• Historic data can be used to predict future investable balances.
Projected Portfolio Growth 45,000,000 40,000,000 35 000 000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15 000 000 15,000,000 10,000,000
0
Jan-9 99 Aug‐06 6 May-9 Dec‐06 699 Sep-9 Apr‐07 799 Jan-0 00 Aug‐07 7 May-0 Dec‐07 700 Sep-0 Apr‐08 800 Jan-0 Aug‐08 801 May-0 01 Dec‐088 Sep-0 01 Apr‐099 Jan-0 02 Aug‐099 May-0 02 Dec‐099 Sep-0 02 Apr‐100 Jan-0 03 Aug‐100 May-0 03 Dec‐100 Sep-0 03 Apr‐111 Jan-0 04 Aug‐11 104 May-0 Dec‐11 1 Sep-0 04 Apr‐12 2 Jan-0 05 Aug‐122
5,000,000
Actual Monthly Balances
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
Projected Monthly Balances
18
Identify the “Core” Portfolio
PFM
• Most governments have a “core” or stable portion of the portfolio that can be invested further out on the yield curve, taking advantage of higher rates. • Even at its lowest balance, a portion of funds are kept liquid, usually between 10% and 25%, depending on the client’s needs.
45,000,000 , , 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0
Jan-99 Aug‐06 May-99 Dec‐06 Sep-99 Apr‐07 Jan-00 Aug‐07 May-00 Dec‐07 Sep-00 Apr‐08 Jan-01 Aug‐08 May-01 Dec‐08 Sep-01 Apr‐09 Jan-02 Aug‐09 May-02 Dec‐09 Sep-02 Apr‐10 Jan-03 Aug‐10 May-03 Dec‐10 Sep-03 Apr‐11 Jan-04 Aug‐11 May-04 Dec‐11 Sep-04 Apr‐12 Jan-05 Aug‐12
Analysis of Core Portfolio
Historical Hi t i l Sh Short-term tt Portfolio P tf li Historical Core © 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
Projected Short-term Portfolio Projected Core 19
Incorporate Balances into an Investment Plan Historical Short-Term Portfolio
PFM
Projected Short-Term Portfolio
Historical Liquidity Reserve
All Funds F d - Total T t l Analysis of Core Portfolio 160,000,000 140,000,000 120,000,000 100,000,000 80,000,000 60,000,000 40,000,000
Historical Historical Short-term Short-term PortfolioPortfolio
Historical Liquidity Historical Reserve Liquidity Reserve
Historical Core Historical Core
Projected Projected Short-term Short-term PortfolioPortfolio
Projected Liquidity Reserve Projected Liquidity Reserve
Projected Core Projected Core
Historical Core Portfolio
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
Projected Liquidity Reserve
Feb-09 Feb-10
Oct-08 Oct-09
Jun-08 Jun-09
Feb-08 Feb-09
Oct-07 Oct-08
Jun-07 Jun-08
Feb-07 Feb-08
Oct-06 Oct-07
Jun-06 Jun-07
Feb-06 Feb-07
Oct-05 Oct-06
Jun-05 Jun-06
Feb-05 Feb-06
Oct-04 Oct-05
Jun-04 Jun-05
Feb-04 Feb-05
Oct-03 Oct-04
20,000,000
Projected Core Portfolio
20
Impact on Portfolio
PFM
• Understanding cash flows can allow the portfolio to be invested longer and more broadly to generate higher returns.
TSY 20% MMF 100%
AGY 40%
MMF 25% CD 15%
Before Yield: Avg. Maturity: Average Rating:
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
After 0.15% 1 day AAA
Yield: Avg. Maturity: Average Rating:
0.50% 1 year AAA
21
Investment Opportunities
PFM
U S Treasury U.S.
Agency
Comm Paper Comm.
3 month
0.12%
0.17%
0.24%
6 month
0.17%
0.21%
0.30%
1 year
0.31%
0.34%
--
2 year
0.57%
0.71%
--
3 year
0.89%
1.06%
--
Maturity
As of 9/10/10 © 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
22
III. Market Update
Longest “Bull Market” In History
PFM
10-Year U.S. Treasury Yields 1965 - 2010 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2.79%
2% 0% 1964 1967 1969 1972 1974 1977 1979 1982 1984 1987 1989 1992 1994 1997 1999 2002 2004 2007 2009
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
24
Treasury Yields Hit Record Lows
PFM
2-Year U.S. Treasury Yields September 2009 – September 2010 1 4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 1.0% 0 9% 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% Sep '09
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
0.45% Dec '09
Mar '10
Jun '10
Sep '10
25
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
PFM
• Yield curve has “flattened” but remains steep by historical standards
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
9/10/09
9/10/10
Change
3 month
0.14%
0.14%
0.00%
6 month
0.21%
0.18%
- 0.03%
year 1y
0.37%
0.24%
- 0.13%
2 year
0.88%
0.57%
- 0.31%
3 year
1.43%
0.89%
- 0.54%
5 year
2.28%
1.59%
- 0.69%
10 year
3.35%
2.80%
- 0.55%
30 year
4.20%
3.88%
- 0.32%
5%
4%
Yield
3%
2%
September 10, 2009
1%
September 10, 2010 0% 3 m
3 y
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Maturity
30 y
26
Bonds and Stocks are Intertwined
PFM
Dow Jones Industrial Average vs. 10-yr U.S. Treasury Yields September 2007 – September 2010 15,000
6.0%
14,000
5.5%
13,000
5.0%
12,000
4.5%
11,000
4.0%
10,000
3.5%
9,000
3.0%
8 000 8,000
2 5% 2.5%
7,000
2.0%
6,000
1.5%
Sep '07
Sep '08
DJIA © 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Sep '09
Sep '10
10-year Treasury 27
Summary of U.S. Economic Conditions •
Economic recovery continues, but pace has slowed: – 2010 Q2 GDP was +1.6% -- a sharp slowdown from Q4 & Q1 – Averaging A i lless th than 100K new private i t sector t jjobs b per month th – Manufacturing and Service Sector industry surveys show slower growth – Very V llow iinflation fl ti prospects t
•
Significant troubles remain: – High unemployment (9.6%) – Housing market – expiration of first-time homebuyer tax credit – Government intervention (cap & trade, healthcare, FinReg, taxes) – Banks hording cash, not lending – Corporations hording cash, not investing – European sovereign debt crisis likely to impact global recovery – Global stock markets volatile on worries of “double dip”
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
PFM
2828
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
PFM
Gross Domestic Product 2005Q1 – 2011Q2 8% 6%
Economists Forecasts
4% 2% 0% -2% -4% -6% -8% 1Q05 3Q05 1Q06 3Q06 1Q07 3Q07 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q11
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
29
Unemployment Rate Remains Troubling
PFM
Unemployment Rate National and Missouri August 2004 – August 2010 11% 10%
8% 7% 6%
Unemploym ment Rate
9%
5%
Aug 04
Aug 05
Aug 06 U-3 Unemployment
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Aug 07
Aug 08
Aug 09
4% Aug 10
Missouri Unemployment Rate
30
Improvement Gains Have Faltered
PFM
Key Employment Indicators 12%
600
10%
400 8%
200
6%
0 (200)
4%
(400) 2%
(600) (800) Mar 04
Mar 05
Mar 06
Mar 07
Non-Farm Payrolls © 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Mar 08
Mar 09
Unemploym U ment Rate
Ch hange in No on-Farm Pa ayrolls (Tho ousands)
800
0% Mar 10
U-3 Unemployment
31
Watch the Weekly Jobless Claims
PFM
Weekly Jobless Claims 2005 - 2010
700
I Insufficient ffi i t Progress P
Thousands per Wee ek
600
500
400
300
200
100
0 2005
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
32
Excess Manufacturing Capacity
PFM
Manufacturing Capacity Utilization 1985 – 2010 86%
82%
Average since 1948 78%
74%
70%
66% 1985 © 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
33
Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)
PFM
• LEI are used as a gauge of future GDP growth • LEI have begun to reverse the positive trend from late 2009 & early 2010 Index of Leading Economic Indicators January 2008 – July 2010 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% Expansion
0.50% 0.00% Contraction
-0 50% -0.50% -1.00% -1.50% Jan-08
Apr-08
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: The Conference Board
Jul-08
Oct-08
Jan-09
Apr-09
Jul-09
Oct-09
Jan-10
Apr-10
Jul-10
34
Inflation Remains Subdued, Deflation Concerns Persist
PFM
PCE Deflator January 2005 – September 2010 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% -1% -2% J 05 Jan-05
J l 05 Jul-05
J 06 Jan-06
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
J l 06 Jul-06
J 07 Jan-07
J l 07 Jul-07
J 08 Jan-08
J l 08 Jul-08
J 09 Jan-09
J l 09 Jul-09
J 10 Jan-10
J l 10 Jul-10
35
PFM
Inflation Indicators July 2010
June 2010
July 2009
Consumer Price Index
1 20% 1.20%
1 10% 1.10%
-2.10% 2 10%
Core CPI
0.90%
0.90%
1.50%
Producer Price Index
4.20%
2.80%
-6.90%
Core PPI
1.50%
1.10%
2.50%
Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Deflator
1.50%
1.40%
-1.00%
Core PCE
1.40%
1.40%
1.30%
Price of Oil/Barrel
$79.39
$76.60
$77.91
$1181.00
$1242.25
$954.00
Price of Gold/Ounce
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
36
Deficits Cause Treasury Borrowing to Surge
PFM
Total U.S. Treasury Debt Outstanding 1989 –2009 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 Dec '89
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Dec '94
Dec '99
Dec '04
Dec '09
37
Silver Lining of Low Rates
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: wallstreetjournal.com
PFM
38
Short Rates to Remain “Exceptionally Low”
PFM
Fed Funds Target Rate August 2004 – August 2010 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Aug '04
Aug '05
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Aug '06
Aug '07
Aug '08
Aug '09
Aug '10
39
Interest Rate Forecasts Vary Widely
PFM
Two Year U Two-Year U.S. S Treasury Note Yield and Forecasts August 2009 – March 2012 6% August 2009 forecast y 2-Year U.S. Treasury August 2010 forecast
5%
Guerilla Economics
RBS
4% 3%
Barclays Capital Societe Generale Morgan Stanley
2%
Credit Suisse Goldman Sachs
1% 0% Aug-09
Credit Suisse Goldman Sachs
Dec-09
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Apr-10
Aug-10
Dec-10
Apr-11
Aug-11
Dec-11
40
IV. Investment Opportunities in the C Current Market M k
Investment Opportunities
PFM
U S Treasury U.S.
Agency
Comm Paper Comm.
3 month
0.12%
0.17%
0.24%
6 month
0.17%
0.21%
0.30%
1 year
0.31%
0.34%
--
2 year
0.57%
0.71%
--
3 year
0.89%
1.06%
--
Maturity
As of 9/10/10
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
42
PFM
European Sovereign Debt Crisis Weighs on Markets Select European Country Credit Default Swap Prices March 31, 2009 – August 30, 2010 $1,200
$1,000
Greece Spain Portugal
$800
Italy Ireland
$600
$400
$200
$Mar-09
May-09
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Jul-09
Oct-09
Dec-09
Feb-10
Apr-10
Jun-10
Aug-10
43
Value in Commercial Paper
PFM
Short-Term Rates January 1, 2010 – September 10, 2010 0 70% 0.70% 3-Month LIBOR
0.60%
CP has value
Fed Target Rate 90 Day Commercial Paper 90-Day
0.50%
0.40%
0.30%
0.20%
0.10% 01/01/10
02/01/10
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
03/01/10
04/01/10
05/01/10
06/01/10
07/01/10
08/01/10
09/01/10
44
Agency Floaters Offer Value
PFM
Fed Funds Effective Rate August 2005 – September 2010
Federal Agency Floater Rates I d Indexed d tto Fed F d Funds F d
6%
5%
Maturity
Current Rate
12 month
FF + 0.10% = 0.30%
18 month
FF + 0.15% = 0.35%
24 month
FF + 0.25% = 0.45%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0.20%
0% Aug-05
Aug-06
Aug-07
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
Aug-08
Aug-09
Aug-10
45
V. Update on Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac
The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
PFM
July 2008: - As part of the reform of GSE regulation, the act created a new regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) (FHFA), by combining three government agencies agencies.
- Powers granted to the FHFA: - Safety and soundness mandate - Mission oversight responsibilities for the housing GSEs - Certain conservatorship powers, which they would use within a few months.
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
47
Conservatorship
PFM
Sept 2008: - FHFA placed FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship. - Goal of conservatorship: - Conserve the enterprises’ assets - Mitigating systematic risk. - FHFA assumed the power of the board and management. - Reconstituted the boards and executive management - Eliminated common and preferred dividends (saving $2B/yr) - Halted all political and lobbying activities - Implemented enterprise risk oversight system ,including: - Governance - Solvency - Earnings - Credit/market/operational risk. - Note: FHFA cannot dissolve the enterprises. This can only be done by an act of Congress Congress.
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
48
Agency Market Remains Active
PFM
Federal Agency Average Daily Trading Volume 1997 - 2009 400 Federal Agency Securities Agency MBS
B Billions
300
200
100
0 1997
1999
2001
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: SIFMA US Bond Markets Average Daily Trading Volume
2003
2005
2007
2009
49
Sr. Debt Credit Ratings Remain “AAA”
I Issuer Fannie Mae
T Type off D Debt bt
S&P
M d ’ Moody’s
PFM
Fit h Fitch
Short Term Debt A-1+
P-1
F1+
AAA
Aaa
AAA
A1 A-1+
P1 P-1
F1 F1+
AAA
Aaa
AAA
Long Term Debt
Freddie Mac
Short Term Debt
Long Term Debt
Source: Credit Ratings from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Second Quarter 10-Q as of July 30, 2010; Fannie Mae 10-K from 2006-2010; Freddie Mac Annual Information Statement from 2002-2008; Freddie Mac 10-K from 2009-2010
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
50
Challenges Remain - Housing market remains weak, but may be bottoming. Serious problems remain in certain geographic regions (NV, CA, AZ, FL). - D Delinquencies li i and d fforeclosures l remain i att ttroubling bli levels, the highest in recent history.
PFM
Delinquencies 11.0% 9 0% 9.0% 7.0%
- REO: collectively they own over 100K properties. 5.0%
- High unemployment and slow recovery pose significant headwinds.
3.0% Jun 00
Jun 02
- Their huge retained portfolios expose them to a huge amount of market risk, risk should rates move up sharply sharply.
Jun 04
Jun 06
Jun 08
Jun 10
Jun 08
Jun 10
Foreclosures 5.0%
- Continued reliance on front loaded short-term funding.
4.0%
- Staffing: attracting and retaining high quality staff.
3.0% 2.0%
- Ultimate future: to be determined by Congress. For the foreseeable future, there is no alternative. The private-label securitization market is virtually dead, and will never return in its prior form. form
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC Source: Bloomberg
1.0% 0.0% Jun 00
Jun 02
Jun 04
Jun 06
51
Conclusion – Agencies are Still Safe Investments
PFM
• Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac remain critical to mortgage finance in the U.S. • U.S. Treasury currently providing unlimited support • Agency debt is widely held • Agency market remains liquid and widely accepted • Business B i conditions diti are iimproving i • Default is unthinkable • Congressional solution will protect bondholders
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
52
PFM
Questions?
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
53
PFM
Thank You!
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
54
Disclaimer
PFM
This material is based on information obtained from sources generally believed to be reliable and available to the public, however PFM Asset Management LLC cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness or suitability. This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or a specific recommendation. All statements as to what will or may happen under certain circumstances are based on assumptions, some but not all of which are noted in the presentation. Assumptions may or may not be proven correct as actual events occur, and results may depend on events outside of your or our control. Changes in assumptions may have a material effect on results. Past performance does not necessarily reflect and is not a guaranty of future results. The information contained in this presentation is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities.
© 2010 PFM Asset Management LLC
55