Anal Cancer Trial Umbrella. Personalising Radiotherapy Dose in Anal Cancer including ACT3 and ACT4 trials

Anal Cancer Trial Umbrella Personalising Radiotherapy Dose in Anal Cancer including ACT3 and ACT4 trials Study Team including specific leads •  •  ...
Author: Alison Parker
2 downloads 2 Views 932KB Size
Anal Cancer Trial Umbrella Personalising Radiotherapy Dose in Anal Cancer including ACT3 and ACT4 trials

Study Team including specific leads

•  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  • 

Lead – David Sebag-Montefiore ACT3 trial leads – Mark Harrison Richard Adams ACT4 trial leads – Maria Hawkins David Sebag-Montefiore Non trial IMRT lead – Rebecca Muirhead Imaging – Vicky Goh Medical Oncology – Sheela Rao Pathology – Gordon Hutchins Local excision lead – Andrew Renehan Patient and Public Involvement – Lindy Berkman, Alf Oliver Translational leads – Duncan Gilbert and Andrew Renehan RTQA – Liz Miles PROMS – Galina Velikova and Alex Gilbert IRCI - Rob Glynne-Jones USA Task Force/Intergroups – Lisa Kachnic Clinical Nurse Specialist – Gillian Knowles Clinical Trial Unit – Leeds –  Alex Smith, Walter Gregory, Lucy McParland

Background •  3 phase III trials defined MMC 5FU CRT as standard of care •  •  • 

ACT1 (UKCCCR) RT vs CRT (wide field RT + gap + boost) EORTC trial as per ACT1 RTOG 5FU RT +/- MMC

•  3 further phase 3 trials •  •  • 

ACT2 n=940 2 phase RT technique no boost no gap •  No benefit for maintenance Cis 5FU (ACT2) •  No improvement in CR with concurrent cisplatin vs 5FU RTOG 9811 •  Inferior outcome with neoadjuvant + conc Cis 5FU (RTOG 9811) ACCORD 03 •  No benefit for neoadjuvant Cis5FU •  “Signal” of benefit for sequential boost after a gap (standard vs higher dose)

•  Targeted (EGFR) not encouraging

Background •  Previously “one dose fits all” •  The gap does not make radiobiological sense •  IMRT can reduce acute toxicity –  RTOG 0529 phase II (Kachnic et al) –  UK solution developed (Muirhead et al NCRI 2013) •  Translate ACT2 doses into singe phase IMRT •  Adapt target volume atlases •  Define standard doses for future control arms •  Multicentre solution •  IMRT allows SIB dose escalation •  No prolongation in overall time •  RCR audit (Q4 2014)

Scientific Question and portfolio fit •  The scientific question –  Personalised radiotherapy dose for patients with anal cancer –  TRIALS –  ACT3 – dose de-escalation for early stage disease –  ACT 4 – dose escalation for locally advanced disease –  Evaluate IMRT outcomes for anal cancer (“Standard” cohort) –  Evaluate outcomes after local excision (“Local excision” cohort) –  Anal cancer platform for translational (imaging and biomarker) research

•  Portfolio fit and CSG discussion –  –  –  –  – 

UK is at the international forefront for anal cancer trials (ACT1 and ACT2) Developed with and by the ano-rectal subgroup of the Colorectal CSG No competing trials in the UK No phase III trials in progress worldwide Presented and supported by the anal cancer IRCI group

•  Patient and Public Involvement –  Lindy Berkman, Alf Oliver and Pelvic Radiation Disease Association

The “Umbrella” ?International trial T1 N0 Anal margin Local excision

T3/4 NO T2N2, T3/4 N1-3

T1,T2