AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 15 August 2008 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00405-08 Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.
1
A real-time PCR method for detection of pathogenic
2
Yersinia enterocolitica in Food
1
3 4 5
D E
S. Thisted Lambertz1*, C. Nilsson1, S. Hallanvuo2 and M. Lindblad1
6 7
Research and Development Department, National Food Administration, Uppsala, Sweden1; Environmental and
8
Food Research Laboratory (TavastLab), Municipal Joint Union for Public Health in Hämeenlinna Region,
9
Hämeenlinna, Finland2
T P
10
E C
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
C A
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
*Corresponding author: Susanne Thisted Lambertz, National Food Administration
27
Research and Development Department, PO Box 622, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden
28
Phone: +46 (0)18 17 55 62; Fax: +46 (0)18 17 14 94; E-mail:
[email protected]
2
29
Current methods for detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in food are time-
30
consuming and inefficient. Therefore, we have developed and in-house evaluated a
31
TaqMan probe-based real-time PCR method for detection of this pathogen. The
32
complete method comprised overnight enrichment, DNA extraction and real-time PCR
33
amplification. Included in the method was also an internal amplification control. The
34
selected primer-probe set was designed to use a 163-bp amplicon from the
35
chromosomally located gene ail (attachment and invasion locus). The selectivity of the
36
PCR was tested on a diverse range (n=152) of related and unrelated strains and no false-
37
negative or false-positive PCR results were obtained. The sensitivity of the PCR
38
amplification was 85 fg purified genomic DNA equivalent to 10 cells per PCR-reaction
39
tube. Following enrichment of 10-g of food sample (milk, minced beef meat, cold-
40
smoked sausage, fish and carrots) the sensitivity ranged from 0.5 to 55 cfu Y.
41
enterocolitica. Good quality of precision, robustness and efficiency of the PCR
42 43 44 45 46
D E
T P
E C
C A
amplification was also established. In addition, the method was tested on naturally contaminated food; in all 18 out of 125 samples were positive for the ail gene. Since no conventional culture method could be used as reference, the PCR products amplified from these samples were positively verified using conventional PCR and sequencing of the amplicons. A rapid and specific real-time PCR method for detection of pathogenic Y.
47
enterocolitica in food, as presented here, provide a superior alternative to the current
48
available detection methods and makes it possible to identify the foods at risk of Y.
49
enterocolitica contamination.
50 51 52 53
3
54
Y. enterocolitica is causing yersiniosis in many countries in the world (28). Yersiniosis is an
55
internal infection with the predominant symptoms being diarrhoea, fever, abdominal pain and
56
vomiting. On a worldwide basis, the vast majority of reported cases occur sporadically, with
57
Y. enterocolitica bio/serotype 4/O:3 being main responsible for the infections and with the
58
source of infection unsolved. Y. enterocolitica is predominately considered as a food-borne
59
agent, and as the bacterium has the ability to multiply in foods at low temperatures,
60
approaching 0°C, as well as in vacuum- and modified atmosphere packages, it is of significant
61
concern from a food safety and public health perspective.
D E
T P
62 63
Y. enterocolitica is widely distributed in nature, however, among a large number of existing Y.
64
enterocolitica bioserotypes only a few are pathogenic to humans (17, 28). The most
65
commonly encountered bioserotypes isolated from yersiniosis patients worldwide are 4/O:3,
66
2/O:9, 2/O:5:27 and 1B/O:8. It is well established that pigs are the main reservoir for Y.
67 68 69 70 71
E C
C A
enterocolitica and pork is therefore likely to be the most important vehicle for the transmission to humans, directly or indirectly (17). However, the pathogen has seldom been isolated from food (8). The problem has been identified as methodological referring to the fact that no traditional culture method works satisfactory. Detection of Y. enterocolitica in food can be significantly improved by PCR, especially the second generation of PCR
72
methodologies, i.e., real-time PCR, which has overcome several limitations of a conventional
73
PCR, may be useful.
74 75
In recent years, workers have developed PCR-based assays for detection of pathogenic Y.
76
enterocolitica in food. One conventional PCR assay developed in our laboratory targets the
77
chromosomally located virulence associated gene ail in a nested-PCR format (30). Other
78
researchers have reported conventional PCR assays designed to target the ail gene as well as
4
79
other genes using single or nested PCR formats (4, 18, 21). Virulence in Y. enterocolitica
80
results from a complex interplay between a series of plasmid- and chromosomally located
81
genes. However, PCR targets located on the virulence plasmid must be considered unsuitable
82
as targets for detection because the plasmid is unstable and easily lost during laboratory
83
treatment (5, 22).
D E
84 85
Real-time PCR assays, especially those using TaqMan-based probes, provide greater
86
specificity and require less time and labour to complete than conventional PCR. Real-time
87
PCR assays for detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in food using a TaqMan probe have
88
previously been developed (6, 16, 31). However, in some instances these methods are not
89
applicable as a diagnostic tool as they were not rigorously evaluated or lack an internal
90
amplification control.
91 92 93 94 95 96
T P
E C
C A
The European Standardization Committee (CEN) in collaboration with the International Standardization Organisation (ISO) is currently preparing a protocol describing minimal requirements of performance characteristics for molecular methods developed for detection of nucleic acid sequences (1). In addition, an EU-research project entitled FOOD-PCR has proposed a strategy and principles for standardization of PCR methods developed for
97
detection of food-borne pathogens. An in-house evaluated PCR method should fulfil certain
98
criteria such as high selectivity, sensitivity, precision, robustness etc. and an important
99
prerequisite is that an internal amplification control is included in the method (1, 24). The aim
100
of this study was to develop a method for detection of the pathogenic bioserotypes of Y.
101
enterocolitica present in food by using real-time PCR with TaqMan probes applying
102
performance criteria suggested by international standardization bodies for an in-house
103
evaluated method.
5
104
MATERIALS AND METHODS
105 106 107
Bacterial strains and growth medium. The 152 bacterial strains used in this study are shown in Table 1. The
108
strains were from human (n=81), pig (n=16), food (n=27), water (n=2) and unknown (n=26) sources. The
109
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains were chosen to represent the most common bioserotypes associated with
110
human or animal disease, and the non-pathogenic strains are the most common recovered from food, human, and
111
environmental sources. The strains were recognised as pathogenic and non-pathogenic by virtue of their origin
112
and/or biochemical classification. All strains were prepared as follows: pure colonies were grown on nutrient
113
agar NA (CM3, Oxoid Hampshire, England) at 30°C overnight. Per sample, a loop of colonies were transferred
114
to a tube containing 200 µl of MilliQ water (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and 20 µl 0.8 M NaOH. The tubes
115
were incubated for 10 min at 70 to 75°C, and subsequently 48 µl of equal volumes of 0.8 M HCl and 0.1 M Tris
116
(pH 8.3) were added. The samples were mixed and centrifuged. Aliquots of 5 µl of each sample were used for
117
the PCR amplification. The reference strain Y. enterocolitica bio/serotype 4/O:3 (SLV-408, CCUG 45643)
118
originally isolated from frozen raw dog food (pig meat) was used for optimization and evaluation of the real-time
119 120 121 122 123 124
D E
T P
E C
C A PCR assay.
Terms. Selectivity is a measure of the degree of response from target and non-target microorganisms (1). It comprises the two terms (i) inclusivity, i.e. detection of the target organism from a wide range of strains, and (ii) exclusivity, i.e. lack of response from a relevant range of closely related non-target microorganisms. Sensitivity of a PCR assay is the lowest number of cells that can be detected in one single analysis, precision the closeness
125
of agreement between test results and robustness refers to the ability of the PCR to withstand small procedural or
126
environmental changes. Finally, accuracy refers to the closeness of agreement between a test results and the
127
accepted reference value.
128 129
DNA purification. When the PCR assay was tested for sensitivity, precision, robustness and detection
130
probability, either enriched homogenates, broth cultures or cell suspensions were used and prior to the PCR
131
amplification genomic DNA was extracted by using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen Gmbh, Hilden,
132
Germany). The procedure was conducted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One millilitre of the
6
133
homogenates or broth cultures or 100-200 µl of the cell suspensions was used, and the final DNA was
134
resuspended in 200 µl AE-buffer.
135 136
Real-time PCR and cycling parameters. To find the primer concentrations that would produce the optimal
137
amplification signal, nine different combinations between 50-900 nM of the forward and reverse primer were
138
tested. The optimal PCR conditions were the following: 1x TaqMan®Universal PCR Master mix (contains
139
AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase, dNTPs, Passive reference 1 and optimized buffer components; Applied
140
Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), primers (real 9A and real 10A) to a final concentration of 900 nM, probe to
141
a final concentration of 200 nM, approximately 100 copies of internal amplification control IAC-DNA
142
(TaqMan® Exogenous Internal Positive Control; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 1x IAC Mix
143
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and, finally, 5-µl aliquots of the sample per reaction mixture.
144
Sterile MilliQ water was used to adjust the volume of each reaction mixture to 25 µl. PCR cycling parameters
145
were as follows: initial denaturation of the template DNA at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for
146
15 s and at 60°C for 1 min. In order to prevent carryover contamination, TaqMan® Universal PCR Master mix
147
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the inclusion of dUTP instead of dTTP was used in all tests
148 149 150 151 152 153
D E
T P
E C
C A
on naturally contaminated foods presented in this paper; uracil-N-glycosylase (UNG) was then applied in the reaction to inactivate all undesired amplified PCR products (at an incubation step of 50°C for 2 min which was added to cycling parameters described above) prior to the amplification reaction. The analyses were performed
in 96-well plates (occasionally 8-strips) using the Applied Biosystems 7500 real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). A non-target control containing 5 µl of MilliQ water instead of DNA was
included in each run to detect any PCR fragment contamination. In addition, a non-patented variant of an internal
154
amplification control, IAC, based on pUC19 (Fermentas, Germany) was tested. Thus, instead of the IPC system
155
described above, 500 nM of each of the primers (IAC_fw and IAC_re; MWG Biotech, Germany), 200 nM of the
156
belonging IAC probe (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and 1 fg of pUC19 was used in each reaction
157
mixture (information below).
158 159
Internal amplification controls. Two internal amplification controls (named IPC and IAC, respectively) were
160
tested in this study: (i) A commercially available TaqMan® Exogenous Internal Positive Control (Applied
161
Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used. The reagent kit included primers, a Vic™probe, IPC target DNA
162
and blocking solution. The IPC target DNA was diluted 10 times to achieve a copy number of approximately 100
7
163
per PCR reaction. The PCR product length is not declared to the costumer. (ii) An open formula pUC 19 based
164
internal amplification control IAC developed by Fricker et al. (9) was used. Approximately 50-100 copies of
165
target DNA (pUC 19) were used per PCR reaction. The size of the IAC was 119 bp. The real-time PCR assay
166
was optimized to work under conditions suitable for detection of the target organism and not the IACs; thus the
167
IACs were let to follow that.
168
D E
169
Primer and probe design. One primer set and two alternative probes were used. Primers, R-real 9A:
170
CCCAGTAATCCATAAAGGCTAACATAT (27-mer) and F-real 10A: ATGATA-
171
ACTGGGGAGTAATAGGTTCG (26-mer); probes, ail probe: FAM-TGACCAAACTTATTACTGCCATA-
172
MGB and Ye probe: FAM-TCTATGGCAGTAATAAGTTTGGTCACGGTGATCT-TAMRA. Two probes were
173
used instead of one in order to offer the user multiple options with a non-patented so called open formula. The
174
primer and probe sequences were designed manually and calculated using nearest-neighbour algorithm by using
175
the Primer Express program (version 3.0) to achieve an annealing/extension temperature of 60°C. The specificity
176
of the amplified sequence was tested by a BLAST search in GenBank database (http:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
177
Both probes were of TaqMan®-style; one was labelled at the 5´end with the reporter dye 6-carboxyfluorescein
178 179 180 181 182 183
T P
E C
C A
(FAM) and at the 3´end with a special chemical compound called minor groove binder (MGB). The other was also labelled at the 5´end with FAM but at the 3´end with the reporter dye tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine (TAMRA). All primers and probes were purchased at www.appliedbiosystems.com.
Sequencing. PCR products amplified from seven of the pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains representing five
different bio/serotypes, and PCR products amplified from nine of the naturally contaminated food samples were
184
sequenced. The PCR products were purified using QIAquick® PCR Purification kit (Qiagen Gmbh, Hilden,
185
Germany) according to the manufactures’ protocol before sequenced at Uppsala Genome Centre (Rudbeck
186
Laboratory, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden). Sequencing was performed in both directions.
187 188
Sensitivity and detection probability. The sensitivity of the PCR amplification was determined with purified
189
DNA. Purified genomic DNA of Y. enterocolitica (purified as described above) was serially diluted 10-fold in
190
sterile MilliQ water and subjected to PCR amplification by using the reaction and cycling parameters described
191
above. The DNA concentration was measured with a NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer at a wavelength
192
of 260 nm. In addition, to determine the detection probability, a broth culture of Y. enterocolitica (SLV-408)
8
193
grown in brain heart infusion, BHI, (Oxoid, Hampshire, England) at 25°C overnight was 10-fold serially diluted
194
in peptone water (Oxoid). Aliquots (0.1 ml) of the serial dilution were plated in duplicate onto NA plates and
195
grown at 30°C overnight. The colonies were counted to determine the total number of viable Y. enterocolitica
196
cfu. Genomic DNA was extracted (purified as described above) from 1 ml of each of the dilutions presumed to
197
contain 100 to 106 cfu per ml. Per dilution, five aliquots (5 µl) and 100 copies of the IPC per aliquot were used
198
for PCR amplification. This experiment was repeated six times, thus resulting in 30 PCR results for each cell
199
concentration.
D E
200 201
Precision test. The precision of the PCR amplification was determined by analysing a 10-fold serial dilution of
202
genomic DNA of Y. enterocolitica once on three consecutive days conducted by the same person. The samples
203
were prepared as follows: colonies of Y. enterocolitica (SLV-408) were suspended in 1 ml of peptone water and
204
genomic DNA released as described above. The DNA concentration was measured with a NanoDrop®;
205
spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 260 nm. The extracted DNA was 10-fold serially diluted in sterile MilliQ
206
water and aliquots (5 µl) of the appropriate dilutions to achieve 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101 and 100 genomic
207
equivalents of Y. enterocolitica DNA were used for PCR amplification. All analyses were performed in the
208 209 210 211 212 213 214
T P
E C
C A
presence of 100 copies of the IPC. In parallel, the 10-fold serial dilution was used to produce a standard curve.
Robustness test. The robustness of the PCR amplification was determined by testing four different annealingextension temperatures, i.e. 58, 60, 62 and 64°C, and by using optimized and suboptimal concentrations, i.e. ±20 %, of the Universal PCR master mix. Each of the conditions was tested in eight replicates on 50 copies of genomic DNA of Y. enterocolitica (SLV-408) in the presence of 100 copies of the IAC. All other cycle conditions were kept constant. The samples were analysed in duplicates.
215 216
Detection in a background of non-Y. enterocolitica DNA. A pure culture of Y. enterocolitica (SLV-408) was
217
grown in BHI broth at 25°C overnight and genomic DNA released from 1 ml of the broth (as described above).
218
The DNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically before 10-fold serially diluted. In parallel a vial
219
containing a freeze dried mixture of Enterobacter cloacae (8x103 cfu per ml), Campylobacter jejuni (30 cfu per
220
ml), Escherichia coli O157 (40 cfu per ml), Listeria monocytogenes (60 cfu per ml) and Salmonella Dublin (15
221
cfu per ml) were cultured in tryptone soya broth (TSB) at 25°C overnight. DNA was also extracted from this
222
broth and the DNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically. Equal volumes (2.5 µl) of the
9
223
extracted background DNA and various concentrations of DNA from Y. enterocolitica ranging from 100 to 106
224
genomic equivalents (per 2.5 µl) were mixed and amplified by PCR as described above. In parallel, the same
225
concentrations 100 to 106 of DNA from Y. enterocolitica were subjected to PCR amplification alone, i.e. without
226
presence of DNA from the background flora. All samples were analysed in duplicates.
227 228
Detection in artificially inoculated food. A pure culture of Y. enterocolitica (SLV-408) was grown in BHI
229
broth at 25°C overnight. The culture was 10-fold serially diluted in peptone water and the total number of viable
230
cells was determined by viable plate count (as described above). One hundred microlitre of appropriate dilution
231
was used to inoculate five different food items: milk (pasteurized, 1.5 % fat), raw minced beef, cold smoked
232
sausage (heat treated at 65°C for 1 to 3 min), carrots (clean unpeeled) and raw fish. The food samples were
233
purchased at local stores in Uppsala, Sweden, and transported and stored chilled until analysis which was started
234
either the same day or the day after arrival. Five 10 gram portions of each food were aseptically transferred to
235
sterile petri dishes and inoculated on the surface with Y. enterocolitica to provide cell numbers of 100, 101, 102,
236
103 and 104 cfu per 10 gram of food. The inoculated foods were kept for 0.5 h at 25°C before being mixed with
237
90 ml TSB supplemented with 0.6 % yeast extract (Y) and homogenised for 1 min (using Stomacher® Seward
238 239 240 241 242 243
D E
T P
E C
C A
filter bags). The homogenates were enriched at 25°C for 18-20 h. DNA from 1 ml of the homogenates was released (as described above). An aliquot (5 µl) of each sample was used for PCR amplification. All samples were analysed in duplicates.
Detection in naturally contaminated food. One hundred five samples of food, comprising raw pork meat
(n=25), cold-smoked sausage (n=25), fish (n=25), carrots (n=25) and milk (n=5), were purchased from shops in
244
Uppsala during June to August 2007. In addition, 20 raw milk samples were collected in June 2007 from milk
245
cows on two dairy farms located near Uppsala. The food items were transported and stored chilled until analysis
246
which was started either the same day or the day after arrival. Twenty-five gram portions of each food were
247
homogenised in 225 ml TSB+Y and enriched at 25°C for 18-20 h. Each homogenate was gently mixed and
248
coarse particles allowed to settle for 15-20 min before DNA from 1 ml of the homogenates was released (as
249
described above). An aliquot (5 µl) of extracted DNA from each of the samples was used for PCR amplification.
250 251
Statistical analysis. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) was used to examine the relations
252
between Ct values and log concentrations of concentrations of purified DNA and log numbers of Y.
10
253
enterocolitica cells (without enrichment). A univariate general linear model (GLM) was used to analyze the
254
relation between numbers of Y. enterocolitica cells inoculated to food and Ct values after enrichment, and
255
possible effects of food type on the relation. The coefficient of variance was used as a measure of intra-
256
individual day-to-day reproducibility in PCR amplifications of different concentrations of DNA.
257 258 259
D E
RESULTS
260
T P
261
Optimization and efficiency of real-time PCR. When nine different primer concentration
262
combinations were tested 900 nM of each of the primers was found to produce the optimal
263
amplification signal. A standard curve based on a 10-fold serial dilution between 101 and 106
264
of genome equivalents of Y. enterocolitica DNA per PCR reaction showed a linear
265
relationship between log input DNA and threshold cycles. The slope was -3.56 and the
266
efficiency 91 %. The threshold line was set to a fluorescence value of 0.01 and was used
267 268 269 270 271
E C
C A throughout the study.
Selectivity of detection. Real-time PCR amplification of genomic DNA using the primers
and probes, the reaction conditions and cycling parameters described here resulted in amplification of the expected 163 bp amplified fragment from all 102 isolates of the
272
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains tested, i.e. 100 % inclusivity (Table 1). Seven of the
273
amplicons were analysed on a 2 % agarose gel confirming a single fragment of the expected
274
length compared to a known DNA size marker (Amersham Biosciences UK). The identity of
275
PCR amplicons from these seven isolates were confirmed by sequencing (Table 2a). The
276
sequence data showed that the bio/serotypes 4/O:3, O:9 and O:5,27 contained 100 % identical
277
nucleotides over the fragments investigated. The amplified 1B/O:8 fragment differed from
278
that in four nucleotides. The sequences were subjected to a homology search in BlastN which
11
279
revealed no other identical sequences than those reported for the ail gene of Yersinia spp. No
280
amplification was noticed with any of the 50 non-pathogenic Y. enterocolitica bioserotypes
281
and other non-Yersinia species, thus the exclusivity was 100 %. The results reported here
282
were equally valid for amplification by using the primers in combination with either the
283
MGB-probe or the TAMRA-probe.
D E
284 285
Sensitivity and detection probability. The minimum level of detection of the ail target from
286
purified genomic Y. enterocolitica DNA was 85 fg with a mean Ct value of 36.93 (standard
287
deviation = 0.90). This level of detection was equivalent to 10 cells of Y. enterocolitica based
288
on the assumption that single copies of the target are present in the genome (Table 3). The
289
analysis of detection probability from a 10-fold serially diluted cell suspension of Y.
290
enterocolitica revealed that there was amplification in 47 % (14 out of 30) of the samples with
291
a cell count level of 10 Y. enterocolitica per ml and in 97 % (29 out of 30) of the samples with
292 293 294 295 296
T P
E C
C A
a cell count level of 100 Y. enterocolitica per ml. Highly significant correlations (Pearson`s r = -1.0, p