2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle PCM Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices

2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle PCM201706 Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices SUMMARY Property Owners: ...
Author: Anna McCarthy
3 downloads 0 Views 8MB Size
2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle PCM201706 Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices

SUMMARY Property Owners: City of Tallahassee Applicant:

Property Location:

TLCPD Recommendation:

1201 Myers Park Drive and 400 E. Van Buren Street

Approve

TLCPD Staff:

Current Future Land Use & Zoning:

LPA Recommendation:

Artie White

Future Land Use: Recreation/Open Space Zoning: Residential Preservation-2

Contact Information:

Proposed Future Land Use & Zoning:

[email protected] (850) 891-6432

Future Land Use: Central Urban Zoning: Central Urban 12

Date: November 2, 2016

Updated: January 17, 2017

City of Tallahassee

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 2 of 13 A. REASON FOR REQUESTED CHANGE At the June 20, 2016 Intergovernmental Agency Board (IA) meeting, the IA paused further design development of a proposed 30-foot tall noise mitigation wall to be located on the City of Tallahassee Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs Administrative Complex property until such time as additional information was provided to the City Commission for further review and discussion. On October 26, 2016, the City Commission discussed the issue and directed staff to initiate a comprehensive plan amendment for the subject area from Recreation/Open Space to Central Urban with a proposed rezoning to CU-12 as an alternative to moving forward with the construction of the sound wall. The development of Cascades Park has heightened interest in the property due to the proximity of downtown and the exceptional downtown park that Cascades Park has become. General conversations with developers have indicated a strong desire to place new residential development within both sight and sound of the park, as it appeals to a growing demographic that desires the urban environment. A conceptual housing plan was developed by the Tallahassee-Leon County Planning Department as one concept that responds to both the inquiries made of staff and the direction of the IA to construct a barrier to mitigate sound from the amphitheater. The residential structures could become the sound wall and the people impacted by the sounds of Cascades Park would be those who desire to be close to the park and amphitheater. The Planning Department’s housing concept seeks to mitigate noise impacts from the adjacent Cascades Park while providing a broader array of housing options than is currently available in the immediate vicinity. Additionally, the current Future Land Use Map designation and the current zoning district are inconsistent with each other and with the current uses on the subject site. During the review of the sound wall issue, it was also discovered that the existing Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs Administrative Offices and supporting facilities, as well as the adjoining City of Tallahassee electric substation, do not conform to the existing Future Land Use Map category and zoning designation. At a minimum, an amendment to the Future Land Use Map is necessary to bring these facilities into conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. B. CURRENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The subject area is currently designated Recreation/Open Space on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed amendment would change the FLUM designation of the area to Central Urban. The following maps illustrate the current and proposed FLUM designations for the subject area.

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 3 of 13 Current Future Land Use Map Designation Current Designation



Recreation/Open Space (OS)

Proposed Future Land Use Map Designation Proposed Designation



Central Urban (CU)

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 4 of 13

C. RECOMMENDATION Find that the proposed future land use maps amendment is consistent with the Tallahassee-Leon County Comprehensive Plan, based on the findings and other information contained in this staff report, and recommend ADOPTION of the proposed amendment. Find that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Tallahassee-Leon County Comprehensive Plan, based on the findings and other information contained in this staff report, and recommend APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning. D. FINDINGS Staff presents the following findings of fact: 1. Policy 2.2.8 [L] states that the Central Urban future land use category is “characterized by older developed portions of the community that are primarily located adjacent to or in close proximity to the urban core and major universities” and that within the Central Urban future land use category, “infill and potential redevelopment and/or rehabilitation activity should be encouraged.” The proposed amendment would not only bring the current uses of the site into conformity, but would also allow for future infill and/or redevelopment activity. The subject area is located within the Multimodal Transportation District and is immediately adjacent to the DT1 Central Core portion of the Downtown Overlay, as defined in the Multimdodal Transportation District Code (Sec. 10-282.1). 2. Sec. 10-167 of the Tallahassee Land Development Code specifically states that the Central Urban District is intended to “encourage infill and intensive development of existing urban areas with readily available services and infrastructure” and land use intensity in the Central Urban District “is intended to be higher due to presence of requisite infrastructure and location to employment and activity centers.” The proposed rezoning would bring the current uses of the site into conformity and allow for future infill and/or redevelopment on the current Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs Administrative Office complex area, which is adjacent to both Cascades Park (activity center) and the DT-1 Central Core portion of the Downtown Overlay. 3. Section 10-239.1 of the Tallahassee Land Development Code states the CU-12 Central Urban District is intended to “Promote compatibility with and encourage the maintenance of residential enclaves located immediately beyond the Downtown area through emphasis on residential land use, limitations on development intensity, and use of design standards” 4. The proposed amendment has no adverse impact on existing or planned infrastructure. 5. The City of Tallahassee Real Estate Management Department is developing a Request for Proposals for potential developers to submit concepts for the subject site consistent with the intent of the proposed amendment.

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 5 of 13 E. STAFF ANALYSIS History and Background The subject area consists of the properties located at 1201 Myers Park Drive and 400 E. Van Buren Street. The property on Myers Park Drive is approximately 9.71 acres and serves as the Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Affairs Department’s Administrative Office Complex. This administrative office complex consists of nine buildings that house offices for 37 staff, a community room, storage areas for aquatics, athletic and special event equipment and supplies, and a maintenance shop for Cascades Park. It also includes outdoor storage areas for landscape maintenance supplies, pool chemicals and equipment, and 30 City vehicles and utility carts. The property on Van Buren Street is approximately 1.52 acres and is the location of an electric substation. As a response to complaints from residents in the Myers Park neighborhood about noise from Cascades Park and the Capital Amphitheater, a sound wall was proposed on the subject site. An analysis conducted by the acoustical consultant, Acoustics By Design, Inc., showed that a 30 foot high wall that extends approximately 315 linear feet could potentially reduce noise impacts from the amphitheater’s house system for some residences south of the berm. The projected design and construction costs of the sound wall, with no aesthetic treatments, were estimated at $475,420. A portion of the proposed sound barrier would also impact 0.27 acres of a flood zone. The construction of the wall would require clearing and grubbing of approximately 0.5 acres to provide the clear area for the wall, to access the site, and for the cranes required to core drill the auger foundations and set the precast panels. In addition, there is an existing stormwater management facility on the property that is in conflict with the proposed wall. The stormwater pond would need to be redesigned, relocated and repermitted as a part of this project. As an alternative to the sound wall proposal, a conceptual housing plan was developed as a way to use residential structures to serve as a sound barrier. The housing concept sought to mitigate noise impacts from the adjacent Cascades Park while providing a broader array of housing options than is currently available in the immediate vicinity. In short, the residential structures could become the sound wall and the people impacted by the sounds of Cascades Park would be those who desire to be close to the park and amphitheater. Previous Commission Consideration •

At the October 26, 2016 regular meeting, The City Commission directed staff to: o Initiate a comprehensive plan amendment for the City’s property from Recreation/Open Space to Central Urban with a proposed rezoning to CU-12. This district would limit residential development to no greater than 12 dwelling units per acre, not including the provisions for a density bonus outlined in the land development code. o Initiate a comprehensive plan amendment for the City’s electric substation (adjoining property) and associated office building to a Comprehensive Plan designation that is appropriate for its existing use.

Current and Proposed Future Land Use Categories The complete comprehensive plan policies for Recreation/Open Space (Policy 2.2.14 [L]) and Central Urban (Policy 2.2.8 [L]) are included as Attachment #1.

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 6 of 13

Recreation/Open Space (OS) (Current) The OS designation allows for active or passive recreational facilities, golf courses, historic sites, forests, cemeteries, or wildlife management areas. The existing use of the subject area is not consistent with the current Future Land Use designation of the property. The principal use on the site is the Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs Department administrative office complex. This administrative office complex consists of nine buildings that house offices for 37 staff, a community room, storage areas for aquatics, athletic and special event equipment and supplies, and a maintenance shop for Cascades Park. It also includes outdoor storage areas for landscape maintenance supplies, pool chemicals and equipment, and 30 City vehicles and utility carts. Additionally, an electric substation is located on the eastern portion of the subject area. Central Urban (CU) (Proposed) The CU designation allows for a variety of residential building types, employment, office, and commercial activity based on the zoning district. The proposed CU-12 zoning allows for community facilities, public parks, and non-commercial public community centers/meeting buildings also. Central Urban is more consistent with both the current use of the property and the proposed use of the property. Any future development resulting from this proposed amendment would be subject to review by the Architectural Review Board (ARB). Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The proposed land use amendment and rezoning would allow for parks and community facilities while providing additional housing within the Multimodal Transportation District adjacent to the Downtown Overlay. This is consistent with objectives and policies in the Mobility Element. Specifically, this is consistent with the following: Objective 1.1 [M] Coordinate transportation and land use systems that foster vibrant communities with compact urban forms and a mixture of uses to minimize travel distances, reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gases, and to enhance pedestrian and bicycle mobility and transit accessibility. Policy 1.1.3: [M] Promote the Downtown as an 18-hour activity center by supporting development of housing, restaurants, and cultural activities to encourage use beyond working hours. Policy 1.1.11: [M] Land Use within the MMTD. The City of Tallahassee and Leon County shall periodically review the Future Land Use Map and land development regulations within the district boundary(ies) and modify them as necessary to provide for appropriate densities, intensities and mixture of land uses to support 18- hour activity and multimodal transportation, based on the following targets: a) A center(s) consisting of employment and services, relatively high density residential, and public spaces all oriented around convenient access to mass transit facilities;

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 7 of 13 b) Ratio of uses: i. Residential = 20%-60% ii. Nonresidential (office, commercial, light industrial, etc.) = 30%-70% iii. Public spaces (open space, parks, recreational, squares, etc.) = 5%-15%; c) Specifically to facilitate walking and bicycling as an alternative to driving, areas designated primarily for residential uses should be no more than ½ mile from areas designated for shopping, services, and employment uses; d) In order to support redevelopment in the urban center of Tallahassee that could support ten minute transit headways and/or light rail, an area wide (excluding open space) residential density of at least 20 units per acre, recognizing that some areas, such as Central Core, may have densities in excess of 150 units per acre and others in established neighborhoods and areas designated Residential Preservation may have significantly less. The Comprehensive Plan defers to Land Development Regulations for development in the Central Urban land use category. This allows for a zoning district that is consistent with the current uses on the subject site. Policy 2.2.8 [L] states, “Actual siting of land uses within the category are dependent on implementing zoning districts. Roadway access standards are determined by application of land development regulations.” Additionally, Policy 2.1.11 [L] states, “Criteria for approval of Central Urban development shall be established in the Land Development Regulations.” See the “Zoning” section of this staff report to analyses related to the proposed CU-12 zoning district. Because the subject area adjoins an area within the Residential Preservation future land use category, development in the subject area with shared property lines would be subject to the provision of a transitional development area (TDA) consistent with Policy 2.2.3 (5)(a)[L]. According to the policy, “Transitional development areas shall be non-mapped areas and shall be approved at the time of site plan approval.” According to Policy 2.2.3 [L], “a number of factors shall be considered when determining a land use compatible with the residential preservation land use category. At a minimum, the following factors shall be considered to determine whether a proposed development is compatible with existing or proposed low density residential uses and with the intensity, density, and scale of surrounding development within residential preservation areas: proposed use(s); intensity; density; scale; building size, mass, bulk, height and orientation; lot coverage; lot size/ configuration; architecture; screening; buffers, including vegetative buffers; setbacks; signage; lighting; traffic circulation patterns; loading area locations; operating hours; noise; and odor. These factors shall also be used to determine the size of transitional development areas.” The Comprehensive Plan defers to Land Development Regulations for development in the Central Urban land use category (Policy 2.2.8 [L]. The CU-12 Central Urban District is intended to “Promote compatibility with and encourage the maintenance of residential enclaves located immediately beyond the Downtown area through emphasis on residential land use, limitations on development intensity, and use of design standards” as stated in the City of Tallahassee Land Development Code (Section 10-239.1).

Zoning The Land Development Code sections for the Residential Preservation-2 (RP-2) (Section 10-170) and Central Urban-12 (CU-12) (Section 10-239.1) zoning districts are included as Attachment #2. The subject area is currently in the Residential Preservation-2 zoning district. This zoning is currently inconsistent with the underlying land use. Section 10-170 of the City of Tallahassee Land Development Code specifically states that “the RP-2 District is intended to apply to residential

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 8 of 13 development in areas designated ‘Residential Preservation’ on the Future Land Use Map, preserving the low density residential character of single-family, two-unit townhouse, and duplex residential development, protecting from incompatible land uses, and prohibiting densities in excess of six (6.0) dwelling units per acre.” Residential Preservation-2 is not intended for areas designated Recreation/Open Space on the Future Land Use map. Consistent with the proposed FLUM amendment, a concurrent rezoning is proposed to change the zoning of the subject area from Residential Preservation-2 to Central Urban-12. According to the land development code, “the proposed zoning district, CU-12, may only be utilized in the Central Urban Comprehensive Plan category.” Principle uses include public community centers/meeting buildings, live-work units, townhouses and other residential units, public parks, community facilities, and similar uses (see Attachment #2). The proposed zoning district also allows electric substations, like currently exists on the subject area, as an accessory use. Central Urban Land Use with CU-12 zoning is consistent with the current uses of the property, unlike the current Recreation/Open Space land use with Residential Preservation-2 District zoning. The CU-12 Central Urban District is intended to “Promote compatibility with and encourage the maintenance of residential enclaves located immediately beyond the Downtown area through emphasis on residential land use, limitations on development intensity, and use of design standards” as stated in the City of Tallahassee Land Development Code. The following maps illustrate the current and proposed zoning for the subject area.

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 9 of 13 Current Zoning Current District •

Residential Preservation-2 (RP-2)

Proposed Zoning Proposed District •

Central Urban-12 (CU-12)

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 10 of 13 Existing Land Uses The subject area is composed of two parcels. The existing use on the 1.52 acre parcel located at 400 E Van Buren Street is an electric substation. The existing use on the 9.71 acre parcel located at 1201 Myers Park Drive is the Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs Administrative Office Complex.

Existing Land Use Map

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 11 of 13 Infrastructure Analysis Water/Sewer The subject area is currently served by City of Tallahassee potable water and sewer services. Adequate potable water and sewer capacity exists to accommodate development of the site under the proposed land use and zoning.

Schools The subject area is zoned for Hartsfield Elementary School, Cobb Middle School, and Rickards High School. Based on school impacts calculated by the Leon County School Board, capacity at each school is available to accommodate the proposed amendment. The present capacity at Hartsfield Elementary School is 212 students and the post-development capacity would be 185 students. The present capacity at Cobb Middle School is 62 and the post-development capacity would be 51 students. The present capacity at Rickards High School is 267 students and the post-development capacity would be 255 students. Roadway Network The subject area is accessed from both E Van Buren Street and Myers Park Drive. Both of these streets are classified as Minor Collectors. The subject area is located within the Multimodal Transportation District (MMTD). The goal of the MMTD is to facilitate the use of multiple modes of transportation, leading to a reduction in automobile use and vehicle miles traveled. At the time of site plan, concurrency requirements will be determined for the project within the Multimodal District to fund needed facilities as redevelopment occurs on the subject area. Pedestrian and Bicycle Network The subject area is accessible via a network of sidewalks and bicycle facilities. Sidewalks exist along both E Van Buren Street and Myers Park Drive. The site is also located along the Indianhead to Railroad Square bike route. These facilities also provide connections to Cascades Park and the Capital Cascades Crossing, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge that links Cascades Park to FAMU Way. Transit Network The subject site is not directly served by the transit. However, the subject site is in close proximity to Cascades Park, which is served by the Tall Timbers, Southwood, and Big Bend routes. The subject site is within ¼ mile of the nearest transit stop. Stops for the Tall Timbers Route, Southwood Route, and Big Bend Route are located within ½ mile of the subject site. Environmental Analysis The subject site is located in the Urban Services Area and in the Multimodal Transportation District on currently developed properties. There are no significant environmental features on the subject site. There is an approximately 0.66 acre area on the property that is in the Flood Zone A, an area subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event.

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 12 of 13 F. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND NOTIFICATION An initial mailing was sent to 135 property owners within 1,000 feet of subject area. Public Outreach

X

Mail Notification of Proposed Changes

X

Notice of Proposed Land Use Change and Rezoning

X

First Public Open House

Date 11/4/2016 11/8/2016; updated 01/04/2017 with LPA Public Hearing location change 11/17/2016

Details Notices Mailed to Property Owners within 1000 feet Two signs providing details of proposed land use and zoning changes posted on subject area 5:30 PM, Second Floor, Frenchtown Renaissance Center

Staff Reports Available Online

Email Subscription Notice sent to all users of service

Second Public Open House

5:30 PM, Second Floor, Frenchtown Renaissance Center

First Public Open House – November 17, 2016: 124 citizens attended the first open house to discuss the 2017 Cycle amendments. Of the 124 attendees, 46 joined a breakout group to specifically discuss the Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhoods Affairs amendment. Attachment #3 includes a summary of the concerns expressed by citizens at the First Public Open House. Some of the concerns are addressed in this staff report; however, many of the concerns would be more appropriately addressed in the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the subject site.

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 13 of 13

G. STAFF REPORT UPDATE Below is a list of all public meetings and actions taken by appointed or elected bodies in consideration of this proposed amendment: Cycle 2016 Meetings

Dates

Time and Locations

Local Planning Agency Workshop

9:00 AM, Second Floor, Frenchtown Renaissance Center

Local Planning Agency Public Hearing

6:00 PM, Second Floor, Frenchtown Renaissance Center

Joint City-County Commission Workshop

1:30 PM, Fifth Floor, Leon County Courthouse

Joint City-County Transmittal Public Hearing

6:00 PM, Fifth Floor, Leon County Courthouse

Joint City-County Adoption Public Hearing

6:00 PM, Fifth Floor, Leon County Courthouse

H. ATTACHMENTS Attachment #1:

Policies for Recreation/Open Space (Policy 2.2.14 [L]) and Central Urban (Policy 2.2.8 [L])

Attachment #2:

Land Development Code sections for the Residential Preservation-2 (RP-2) (Section 10-170) and Central Urban-12 (CU-12) (Section 10-239.1) zoning districts

Attachment #3:

Summary of Citizen Concerns from the First Public Open House held November 17, 2016

2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle PCM201706 Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices Attachment #1 Policy 2.2.14: [L] RECREATION/OPEN SPACE (EFF. 8/17/92; REV. EFF. 7/26/06; RENUMBERED 3/14/07) This category contains: (1) Government owned lands which have active or passive recreational facilities, historic sites, forests, cemeteries, or wildlife management areas. (2)

Privately owned lands which have golf courses, cemeteries, or wildlife management areas.

Permitted uses include passive recreation and silviculture. Active recreation facilities are included if the site is within the USA or a rural community.

Policy 2.2.8: [L] CENTRAL URBAN (REV. EFF. 6/07/01; REV. EFF. 7/26/06; RENUMBERED 3/14/07; REV. EFF. 6/6/08) Characterized by older developed portions of the community that are primarily located adjacent to or in close proximity to the urban core and major universities. Intended to provide a variety of residential types (up to 45 DU/AC), employment (includes light manufacturing), office and commercial activities. Infill and potential redevelopment and/or rehabilitation activity should be encouraged. Actual siting of land uses within the category are dependent on implementing zoning districts. Roadway access standards are determined by application of land development regulations. Land use intensity is intended to be higher (up to 20,000 sq. ft. for minor commercial uses; up to 100,000 sq. ft. for neighborhood commercial uses; and up to 200,000 sq. ft. for community commercial uses) due to the presence of requisite capital infrastructure and location of employment and activity centers.

Tallahassee Land Development Regulations

Sec. 10-170. Residential Preservation District (a)

Purpose and Intent.

(1)

The district is characterized by existing homogeneous residential areas within the community which are predominantly accessible predominantly by local streets. The primary function is to protect existing stable and viable residential areas from incompatible land uses and density intrusions. Commercial, retail, office and industrial activities are prohibited (Certain non-residential activities may be permitted as home occupations--See article VII of this chapter, Supplementary Regulations). Singlefamily, duplex residences, mobile home and cluster housing may be permitted within a range of zero (0) to six (6) units per acre. Compatibility with surrounding residential type and density shall be a major factor in the authorization of development approval and in the determination of the permissible density. No development in the residential preservation district shall be permitted which violates the provisions of Policy 2.1.1 of the Future Land Use Element of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan.

(2)

For Residential Preservation areas outside the Urban Service Area the density of the non-vested development in residential preservation area shall be consistent with the underlying land use category: no more than one (1) unit per ten (10) acres in the Rural category; no more than one (1) dwelling unit per acre (clustered) or one (1) dwelling unit per three (3) acres (not clustered) in the Urban Fringe category. The Residential Preservation land use category is divided into five (5) zoning districts based upon existing development patterns and service provision: a. b. c. d. e.

(3)

RP-1; RP-2; RP-MH; RP-UF; and RPR.

The intent of the districts listed in subsections (2) a. through e. of this section are as follows: a.

The RP-1 District is intended to apply to residential development in areas designated "Residential Preservation" on the Future Land Use Map, preserving single-family residential character, protecting from incompatible land uses, and prohibiting densities in excess of three and six-tenths (3.6) dwelling units per acre.

b.

The RP-2 District is intended to apply to residential development in areas designated "Residential Preservation" on the Future Land Use Map, preserving the low density residential character of single-family, two-unit townhouse, and

duplex residential development, protecting from incompatible land uses, and prohibiting densities in excess of six (6.0) dwelling units per acre. c.

The RP-MH District is intended to apply to residential development in areas designated "Residential Preservation" on the Future Land Use Map, preserving the low density residential character of manufactured home, mobile home, and conventional single-family and duplex residential development, providing protection from incompatible land uses and intensities, and prohibiting densities in excess of six (6.0) dwelling units per acre.

d.

The RP-UF District is intended to apply to residential development in areas designated as both "Urban Fringe" and "Residential Preservation" on the Future Land Use Map, preserving the low intensity residential character of conventional single-family residential and manufactured home, mobile home, development, protecting from incompatible land uses and intensities, preventing the premature development of land at intensities not supportable by existing infrastructure or services, and prohibiting densities in excess of three and sixtenths (3.6) dwelling units per acre in platted subdivisions, one (1.0) dwelling unit per acre (net) for clustered developments on unplatted lots, or one (1.0) unit per three (3) acres, for all other developments.

e.

The RP-R District is intended to apply to residential development in areas designated as both "Rural" and "Residential Preservation" on the Future Land Use Map, preserving the very low density rural residential character of conventional single-family residential and manufactured home, mobile home, development, protecting from incompatible land uses and intensities, preventing inefficient development patterns, and prohibiting densities in excess of three and six-tenths (3.6) dwelling units per acre in platted subdivisions, or one (1.0) dwelling unit per ten (10) acres on unplatted lots.

(4)

Applications for rezoning to any and all of the residential preservation districts shall include review to ensure compatibility with existing and surrounding residential type and density.

(b)

Allowable Uses. For the purpose of this chapter, the following land use types are allowable in the RP-1, RP-2, RP-MH, RP-UF and RP-R zoning districts and are controlled by the Land Use Development Standards of this chapter, the Comprehensive Plan and Schedules of Permitted Uses. (1) Low Density Residential (2) Passive Recreation (3) Active Recreation (4) Community Services (5) Light Infrastructure

(c)

List of Permitted Uses. See Schedules of Permitted Uses, subsections 10-241(a) and (b). Some of the uses on these schedules are itemized according to the Standard Industrial

Code (SIC). Proposed activities and uses are indicated in the schedules. The activity or use may be classified as permitted, restricted or permitted through special exception, or not allowed. Restricted and Special Exception Uses must meet the criteria in article VII of this chapter. Chapter 9, article III of this Code sets forth the development approval process required for allowable uses. (d)

Development Standards. All proposed development shall meet the Land Use Development Criteria specified in subsection 10-241(b); commercial site location standards (section 10-174); buffer zone standards (section 10-177); criteria of the Land Development Standards Schedule (article IV, division 4 of this chapter); and parking and loading requirements (article VI of this chapter).

SECTION 10-241 RESIDENTIAL PRESERVATION ALLOWABLE USES: APPROPRIATE PERMIT LEVEL AND APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT AND LOCATIONAL STANDARDS P PERMITTED USE S SPECIAL EXCEPTION R RESTRICTED USE RESIDENTIAL PRESERVATION - 2 SIC CODE NAME OF USE RESIDENTIAL Dwelling, One-Family Dwelling, Two-Family (Rooming Houses are prohibited) Dwelling, 2-UnitTownhouses

LAND USE TYPE LR PR AR CS LI P P P

SERVICES 821 Elementary and secondary schools 866 Religious Organizations RECREATION Hiking and Nature Trails Picknicking Canoe Trails Bicycle Trails Horseback Riding Trails Tot Lots Court Sports Field Sports PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Police Protection Fire Protection Public Order and Safety

S S

P P P P P P R R

S S S

LEGEND LR = LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PR = PASSIVE RECREATION AR = ACTIVE RECREATION CS = COMMUNITY SERVICES LI = LIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE

DEVELOPMENT TYPE RESIDENTIAL PRESERVATION-2

SINGLE FAMILY & 2 UNIT-TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL UNITS NON-CLUSTERED

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS CLUSTERED

DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL UNIT NON-CLUSTERED

COMM. SERVICES;ACTIVE REC.; PUBLIC, PRIMARY & SECONDARY SCHOOLS

20 _

25 20

20 _

25 20

7.5 _

20 20

25 _

25 10

MINIMUM SETBACKS (FT) Front Yard Building Parking Corner Yard Building Parking Interior Side Yard Building* Parking Rear Yard Building Parking MAXIMUM % OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA MAX. HEIGHT FEET

25 _

Perimeter Setback 25 _ Perimeter Setback 25 _ Perimeter Setback 15 _ Perimeter Setback 25 _

40

40 (of net area)

40

40

35 THE NET DENSITY OF THE PROJECT SITE (CLUSTERED) DEVELOPMENT AND REQUIRED OPEN SPACE) MAY BE NO GREATER THAN 3.6 UNITS PER ACRE

35 14,520 SQ. FT AVG OF ALL LOTS CREATED WITH A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF NO LESS THAN 7,500 SQ. FT.

35 1/2 ACRE

15

15

_

15 _ 15 _ 7.5 _

35 7,260 SQ. FT. AVG OF ALL LOTS CREATED WITH A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF NO LESS THAN 6,000 SQ. FT.

MIN. LOT AREA (ACRES) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE (FEET) *

15

Zero-lot line construction permitted along common wall of townhouse dwelling units.

Sec. CU-12 Central Urban District. See the following chart for district intent, permitted uses, dimensional requirements, and notes for the CU-12 Central Urban District:

CU-12 Central Urban District PERMITTED USES 1. District Intent

The CU-12 district is intended to:  Provide a variety of low to medium density housing types with densities ranging from a minimum of 4 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre;  Promote infill and redevelopment of existing residential urban areas with sufficient supporting infrastructure, accessibility to services, and proximity to the Downtown and Universities;  Promote compatibility with and encourage the maintenance of residential enclaves located immediately beyond the Downtown area through emphasis on residential land use, limitations on development intensity, and use of design standards; and  Promote pedestrian and bicycle mobility. The CU-12 district may only be utilized in the Central Urban Comprehensive Plan Category. The CU-12 district is not subject to the Tallahassee Land Use Development Matrix found in Section I-10 (IV) of the Tallahassee/Leon County Comprehensive Plan. To encourage pedestrian-oriented redevelopment, innovative parking strategies, mixed use development, and other urban design features within the Central Core, a 25% density bonus is available subject to the provisions of Sec. 10-289 of this code. A 35% bonus is available with an Urban Planned Unit Development as found in Sec. 10-200. Development standards for this zoning district are established within Division 4 applicable to the MMTD.

2. Principal Uses

1)

2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9)

Community facilities related to residential uses, including religious facilities, police/fire stations, libraries, and elementary, middle, and high schools. Other community facilities may be allowed in accordance with Section 18.1 of these regulations. Day care centers. Live-work units as defined by the Tallahassee/Leon County Comprehensive Plan. Nursing homes and other residential care facilities. Other uses, which in the opinion of the Land Use Administrator, are compatible to uses in this district. Passive public park. Public park, with playgrounds and active recreation, limited to daytime hours. Public community center/meeting building (non-commercial use only) Residential – any unit type, including townhouses.

3. Accessory Uses

(1) A use or structure on the same lot with, and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to, the principal use or structure and which comprises no more than 33 percent of the floor area or cubic volume of the principal use or structure, as determined by the Land Use Administrator. (2) Light infrastructure and/or utility services and facilities necessary to serve permitted uses, as determined by the Land Use Administrator.

2017 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle PCM201706 Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices Attachment #3 Summary of Citizen Concerns from First Public Open House held November 17, 2016 • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • •

Has development been analyzed to determine if it will actually affect sound? Why not just change the land on the South where light industrial? Noise, traffic, sound tunnel Bad precedent as selling Park land if Economic Development is impetus, then any park is vulnerable How much would moving park offices cost? Sound problems are in the valley/new development would be on the highland, there are gaps in the building; would the buildings be 50 feet tall at low end? 30’ wall with landscaping could be concealed over time; trees would cover much of it from park; would see it from the neighborhood until grown in Cost for rerouting sewer/water, roads, etc.? Has this been evaluated? Changes are irreversible once done Tons of open & green space If Gaines was rerouted to keep traffic out; why change this and counteract that investment; but because of that, can only get to this land via neighborhood Parks and Rec is a polling place - love the building (community center) Two citizens walked site and although there are operations on site, there are mature 40 Live Oaks/Pines/Magnolias; other uses could utilize the property / residential isn’t the only way to better property o Heard the story on Perspectives that there will be development all around the park – was a frightening through. Linking the parks could be a great advantage On industrial part, build new Senior Center If the proposed changed happened, there would be no Community Center and the neighbors really love the community center Potential parking garage and stormwater ponds would be ugly Worried development traffic (road closures) hurts businesses; New development is pushing out local business. Re: housing – they are sure it be students because professionals and retirees don’t want to be near noise Could cause 2000 new trips Cars would make it dangerous to walk to parks, etc. Worried the transfer of sound mitigation would go to a developer and then the project would go south and they don’t finish

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 2 of 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • •

• • • • • • • • • • •

Why propose Central Urban and not just a purely residential district with higher density? Concerned extra traffic on Van Buren Street would hurt bike safety This would hurt what is left of Smokey Hollow Would like chance to walk the site and discuss. Analyze whether this type of product is overdeveloped /is there a market there to support it? Evaluation of Cascades Park on property values Residents won’t like train; document when it passes (is at 4:30 AM) Urban infill only works when there are other amenities, like green space Document all investments already made that would be impacted by this Easter Seals didn’t pay some taxes, so IRS has a judgment on the property Infill, if done improperly, will push people away and counteract goals of infill o Open space and residents are integral to each other Concerned also that would put CU in Myers Park to fix non-conformities Pump Station and Cell Tower – what happens with them? Continuity is a concern; new development would not fit into historic neighborhood Problem with fact that this whole discussion is a result of a previous bad decision of stage placement o Lack of trust/City’s mistake Cascades Park before had flat playing space – not anymore o Leave unprogramed space or extend active recreation uses/pool is heavily used Analysis of need for spaces next to railroad and music Non-conforming use can be rebuilt after because exemptions are given/not correct as was stated by staff Visual rhetoric of presentation to the City Commission of the proposed wall were all bad ones; showed the rundown buildings, not the trees; showed cute townhouses for the infill / not ugly parking garages Cost/Benefit analysis to the City (taxes, etc.) City making decision at a distance. Not making decision for other people. Also consider ad valorem revenue from these neighborhoods (Myers Park/Woodland) Already Lafayette entrance of Seminole has been subject to edge effect (decline); concerned about crime Everyone wants to save the Toole Building Change out sound system for more expensive one Due process of neighborhood; turnover by families with little kids and these are the people we want to keep / this would add traffic and make dangerous for kids / green helps keep them Wall shouldn’t be limited by what FDOT standards can provide 5 people are not residents who signed sheet Wildlife - lot of it in the area and in this site/ continuity of green chain is important Hernando Desoto in area – impacts?

PCM201706: PRNA Administrative Offices Page 3 of 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Who pays for sewer, water, etc., and how is this determined for the RFP? Why not, instead, focus on South Monroe which looks awful? See this as just the City making money Is the intent to change the character of the neighborhoods to be like Gaines? Many open to some development but really concerned about hi density apartment rentals and students Put conservation easement on the rest of Myers Park to a 3rd party, Apalachee Land Conservancy Trust, Tall Timbers, Nature Conservancy Concern about precedent for selling park lands and could this set a precedent for other parks being sold Problem with sound is in the valley. There is a stream there. How can you build residential here? No noise consultant has looked at how the residential building would work for this purpose. 30 foot wall with landscaping could be considered an eyesore. Could consider residential and Governmental Operation instead. There are possibilities of redevelopment while keeping the community center and green space. What happens to pumping station and cell tower? Was there pump remediation on the site? Would this be a huge apartment building that lacks consistency with surrounding area, even townhomes? Concern about what could be allowed. ARB cannot weigh in on density. Just the architecture. Would this be spot zoning? Why is one amendment for an electric station going to GO, but one for this is going to CU-12? Two distinct neighborhoods – Woodlands and Myers Park Protecting the neighborhoods is good for the long term tax income of the City. How are people to comment on the RFP? There is hope that the neighborhood is coming back with kids and families. This could change this by changing the neighborhood. Myers Park can be part of this 18-hour downtown. Student high density doesn’t last that well. Neighbors have lost faith in the City based on comments, the sound issue, proposed storage units next to the Moon.

Citizens Comments as of January 17, 2017

PCM201706 PRNA Administrative offices

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Thursday, November 17, 2016 5:59 PM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Fred & Lois Last Name: Hawkes Street Address: 565 Oakland Ave. City: Tallahassee State: Fl Zip: 32301 Email Address: fhawk@carltonfields Comments: The City made a mistake when it designed Cascades Park amphitheater pointing it directly at Myers Park neighborhood. Now it wants to compound that mistake by completely changing the character of Myers Park neighborhood where we have lived for 35 years. Nothing has changed in the balance of multi-units/rentals and single family residences in this area in the 35 years we have lived here. It has been entirely stable. Thus, there is no basis to abandon the long-standing Comp Plan designation of this land as recreational land. Changing it to urban would allow under the City's plan an addition of 100-150 living units to the area based on its proposed plan for development, many if not most of which will be rentals since they will be right along the railroad track. That would completely change the character of this historic neighborhood. Indeed, many more intensive uses could be proposed if the amendment were allowed. To say that the proposed amendment is flatly and utterly inconsistent with the Comp Plan is a mild understatement. Imagine if the City told the residents of Lafayette Park that it was selling part of the park to allow intense urban development on the park land. Would that be ok? The City is misguided in trying to correct one mistake with an even larger one. To allow such a drastic redesignation of part of the park land to urban is entirely contrary to the whole point of having a Comp Plan in the first place.

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Thursday, November 17, 2016 8:31 AM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Guy Last Name: McKenzie, Jr. Street Address: 1420 Golf Terrace Dr. City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32302 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Our family requests consideration in retaining the present FLUM designation of the Parks & Recreation office site -PCM201706- as OS. To change this to CU would threaten the long-existing character of the neighborhood and be contrary to the purposes of the Historical District which borders this site. It appears to me that demolishing the attractive and compatible Parks & Recreation building would be a substantial loss to the neighborhood and the City of Tallahassee and an unwise use of city funds.

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Monday, November 14, 2016 11:35 PM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Heather Last Name: Fleming Street Address: 535 East Van Buren Street City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Heather R. Fleming 535 East Van Buren Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Owner and resident for 22 years RE: # PCM201706 To Artie White and the Tallahassee- Leon County Planning Commission: I am writing in strong opposition to Amendment #PCM201706. I strongly urge the Commission against rezoning this property. The proposal to rezone from RP2 to CU12 the 9.5-acre parcel directly across from my home serves to promote overdevelopment within the parcel and potentially in other green spaces around the parcel. I would ask that the Commission consider developing this parcel within the restrictions of the existing RP2 zoning. I would encourage the city to keep this land and find more innovative ways to generate better use of the parcel. The loss of a cityowned parcel of land in a prime location is a short-sighted decision at best. I would also ask the Commission to consider, at a minimum, retaining the Parks and Recreation Office buildings. They provide a huge service to the city. While it is important to focus on economic growth, it is also important to have policies that preserve the low-density character of historically significant inner city neighborhoods, like Myers Park and the Park and Recreation Office parcel. Historic preservation means safeguarding the existence and appearance of historic elements of our community. Developing and implementing zoning regulations must be a cooperative process that engages the public. Top-down approaches to zoning often alienate citizens and struggle to properly address the needs of residents and business owners. From the meetings, I have not seen any openness to be cooperative with the neighborhood on this issue. I bought property near a beautiful park and 20 years later got the blessings of a beautiful new park. Despite the neighborhood debates on noise ordinance and sound migration, I feel very fortunate to own and live in my home across from the City Park offices. I have a vision of a peaceful place to live inside the city where I should have little concern for overdevelopment. I have done some remodeling, and I am planning to restore my 1927 home and live there into retirement. Safeguard this parcel and work with the community to agree on a sustainable use for this parcel. I challenge the City and this commission to be bold, innovative, and above all collaborate. Thank you, Heather R. Fleming Tallahassee resident since 1985

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Monday, November 14, 2016 11:31 PM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Heather Last Name: Fleming Street Address: 535 East Van Buren Street City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Heather R. Fleming 535 East Van Buren Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Owner and resident for 22 years RE: # PCM201706 To Artie White and the Tallahassee- Leon County Planning Commission: I am writing in strong opposition to Amendment #PCM201706. I strongly urge the Commission against rezoning this property. The proposal to rezone from RP2 to CU12 the 9.5-acre parcel directly across from my home serves to promote overdevelopment within the parcel and potentially in other green spaces around the parcel. I would ask that the Commission consider developing this parcel within the restrictions of the existing RP2 zoning. I would encourage the city to keep this land and find more innovative ways to generate better use of the parcel. The loss of a cityowned parcel of land in a prime location is a short-sighted decision at best. I would also ask the Commission to consider, at a minimum, retaining the Parks and Recreation Office buildings. They provide a huge service to the city. While it is important to focus on economic growth, it is also important to have policies that preserve the low-density character of historically significant inner city neighborhoods, like Myers Park and the Park and Recreation Office parcel. Historic preservation means safeguarding the existence and appearance of historic elements of our community. Developing and implementing zoning regulations must be a cooperative process that engages the public. Top-down approaches to zoning often alienate citizens and struggle to properly address the needs of residents and business owners. From the meetings, I have not seen any openness to be cooperative with the neighborhood on this issue. I bought property near a beautiful park and 20 years later got the blessings of a beautiful new park. Despite the neighborhood debates on noise ordinance and sound migration, I feel very fortunate to own and live in my home across from the City Park offices. I have a vision of a peaceful place to live inside the city where I should have little concern for overdevelopment. I have done some remodeling, and I am planning to restore my 1927 home and live there into retirement. Safeguard this parcel and work with the community to agree on a sustainable use for this parcel. I challenge the City and this commission to be bold, innovative, and above all collaborate. Than you, Heather Fleming

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Thursday, November 17, 2016 9:34 AM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Joan Last Name: Helms Street Address: 1405 Broome Street City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I live within 1000 feet of the Parks and Rec site and recently received a notice from the Planning Department. I am opposed to the planned development of the Parks and Rec site. There are many issues that should be fully vetted and discussed before moving forward. 1. Overall impact to and future of the Myers Park neighborhood’s historic designation 2. Increased traffic congestion 3. Consideration to the owners/tenets being a “noise barrier”. If we are concerned about the noise, wouldn’t they also be concerned? 4. Importance and the value of maintaining green space within city limits (Myers Parks and other areas in the city) 5. Mature trees and vegetation that serves as a barrier (visual and auditory) that would potentially be removed 6. Historical significance of the Parks and Rec buildings My hope is that the land not be sold for development and that other alternatives be considered.

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Thursday, November 17, 2016 10:46 AM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Lee Last Name: Metcalf Street Address: 1586 Golf Terrace Dr. City: Tallahassee State: Fl Zip: 32306 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I want to voice my opposition to the proposed sale and refining of the Parks and Rec office in Meyers Park. I have several objections. First, the office serves as a community center and voting precinct for the neighborhood. I have often told people that I vote at the most beautiful polling site in the city, and I do not want to lose this peaceful oasis in our neighborhood. Second, the neighborhood has been designated as a historical district. We have accepted limitations on what we can do with our property in order to preserve the character of the neighborhood. It seems that the least we can expect of our elected officials is that the city will not undo all of our hard work by allowing a very dense development in the district. Third, the streets in the area cannot accommodate the traffic that this development will produce. There is very limited access to this area due to Parks, the railroad, and existing residences. Finally, this will aggravate rather than reduce the noise complaints that the city will receive. You would think that people would pay attention to possible sources of noise before they buy or rent, but they rarely do. This housing will be near train tracks with heavy cargo trains going through at night probably shaking the buildings and definitely blowing their whistles as they cross streets. I live far enough away that I enjoy the sound, but I cannot imagine that people living right on the tracks will. It will also explode the number of people exposed to noise and traffic from events at Cascades. Again, I personally enjoy being able to walk to them or to sit on my back porch and listen to concerts for free, but I do not have it in my backyard. For all these reasons, I am opposed to the proposed zoning changes.

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:34 PM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Ralph Last Name: Turner Street Address: 842 Santa Rosa Dr. City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am a resident of the Woodland Drives area, also known as Myers Park or Country Club. This is a neighborhood that is growing and changing, a very desirable close-in location that has potential to become Tallahassee's equivalent of Atlanta's Ansley Park. Unfortunately, this plan would set back the neighborhood's evolution. Point 1: Since the opening of Cascades Park, traffic has multiplied enormously on Myers Park Drive and Circle Drove, disturbing the former tranquility of our neighborhood. Building 100 or so apartments and townhouses would generate impossible traffic on these streets never designed for such heavy traffic. Point 2: The present Parks and Recreation complex should be preserved. It has considerable historic and architectural merit. The site has many large and old trees that add to our park-like neighborhood. Set across from Myers Park, with its recreational facilities, it seems an ideal location for a parks and recreation headquarters. Why go to the expense of demolishing it and finding a new location for the headquarters? Furthermore, it serves as a community center for the neighborhood; it is where we vote and where we hold many neighborhood meetings. I ask that you take these points in mind before you make your decision on this development proposal.

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:19 PM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Robert Last Name: Benton Street Address: 1404 golf terrace drive City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301-5603 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Thank you for the opportunity to state this objection to the proposed changes to the future land use map and zoning and to make this comment and recommendation. The proposed changes are unnecessary and unjustified. Their stated purpose is to make public land, now devoted to park and recreational uses and zoned open space, marketable to developers. The proposed changes run afoul of environmental elements of the comprehensive plan. The City of Tallahassee owns contiguous green space that includes Cascades Park, Myers Park, the golf course leased to Capital City Country Club, and the subject property. This green space should be viewed as a whole, like Central Park in New York, and preserved as a whole. It is a civic treasure the Commission should be at pains to protect and preserve, first and foremost by keeping all its components in public ownership. Streets and a railroad track make it less than a perfect nature preserve (just as streets cross Central Park), but this green space unquestionably provides habitat and corridors for wildlife. No further fragmentation should be countenanced, much less initiated by the city itself. Incidentally, the Cascades property was hardly pristine before the City spent several millions of taxpayer dollars to rehabilitate and develop it as open space. The proposed sale of the immediately adjacent parcel to private developers for anything like the one million dollars contemplated does not make economic sense from any public perspective. Squandering this public resource in this fashion would be inconsistent with sound land use principles and economic development elements of the comprehensive plan. Neither the comprehensive plan nor any land use regulation should be altered to allow any non-public use of the subject parcel. We may all agree in the abstract that residential development by infilling is preferable to leapfrog development requiring additional, avoidable capital outlays for infrastructure, all things being equal. But this truism does not justify the city's selling centrally located park land to developers for their private use and enrichment.

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Thursday, November 17, 2016 4:39 PM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Roberto Last Name: Diaz de Villegas Street Address: 1201 S. Gadsden St City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I own a house on on Van Buren Street, and I personally love the view driving down the hill to my house, which I'm guessing is how a lot of folks get to Cascades Park as well. I like the uninterrupted sidewalk along the green space, where I can, at my own pace, walk with my children (2 and 5) as they learn to ride their bikes to Myers Park. I like seeing and hearing owls in the trees there. I am concerned that we would eliminate this green space, and not just because I find it appealing. I know that part of containing our urban sprawl is to fill urban spaces; but I think there are spaces that could be better used towards this end. The section of this parcel on the other end of the Parks and Recreation building currently has unattractive buildings, is adjacent to Cascades and Myers Parks, and is located away from other homes in the neighborhood. If something were to go there, it would put less stress on the neighborhood. I am concerned about having another high density development plopped right next to my house. For one, it would increase the traffic running by us. Shortly after Cascades Park opened, traffic was blocked from coming into the neighborhood via Oakland Street at the end of my block. This directed a lot of through-traffic by my house. This, at a time when we now had traffic from a popular park that had just opened across the street from our house, and then a restaurant that seemed to have no plan as to where to park employees or customers. It has been a lot busier since then. But I love having the park there, so I can tolerate it. I never wanted a sound wall. I like the view of the amphitheater from my back door. I like listening to concerts from my porch. I worry what a development would mean for my family's quality of life, and for our property value. I bought a house in a historic district, knowing that a premiere park was opening across the street. It's not a fancy house by any means, but it's a great spot. Changing the character of the neighborhood threatens the largest investment I've ever made in my life. Thank you for your taking the time to read, Rob

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:04 PM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Sharon Last Name: Woodbery Street Address: 603 E Van Buren Street City: Tallahassee State: Fl Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I have a few questions and comments that I would like to have addressed in the meeting tomorrow. A few are: 1. Why suggest Urban instead of R2 zoning? 2. How much of the property surface is currently covered? Since your density map states that only 22% would be covered if built upon 3. How will traffic be handled along Van Buren? 4. Why the propose realigning Myers Park Drive? Thanks, Sharon Woodbery

1

Calhoun, Sherri From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

        

[email protected] Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:49 PM CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Wings Last Name: Benton Street Address: 1404 Golf Terrace Drive City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: My husband (Bob) and I own property at 1404 Golf Terrace Drive, about two blocks from the Park Administration Building in the Myers Park Historic Neighborhood. My concerns about the proposed changes in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning are: (1) The "Sesquicentennial Building" is the Park Administration Building and serves our neighborhood as a community center. It was dedicated as the "Sesquicentennial Building" to mark the 150th anniversary of the founding of Tallahassee as our state capital. A bronze plaque bears the names of the city and county commissioners then serving. (2) The Sesquicentennial Building was designed by a visionary architect, Albert Trull, to fit perfectly in the neighborhood's environment and to likewise serve its purpose perfectly. Live oaks grow within its area. Foxes and eagles traverse there. Every office in it has a window view of the outdoors. (3) The Sesquicentennial Building must be preserved because of its historical and architectural significance. (4) All the green space around the Sesquicentennial Building must be preserved. It is an important corridor for foxes and eagles and other wildlife. It connects Myers Park to Cascades Park which would be isolated islands without it. Thank you for your consideration.

1

From: To: Subject: Date:

Calhoun, Sherri Calhoun, Sherri FW: 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Friday, November 18, 2016 1:41:36 PM

-----Original Message----From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 8:15 AM To: CMP_PLN_AMND Cc: Sherri Calhoun Subject: 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission *       Amendment: PCM201701 Map *       First Name: Brigitte *       Last Name: McKenzie *       Street Address: 1420 Golf Terrace Dr *       City: Tallahassee *       State: FL *       Zip: 32301 *       Email Address: [email protected] *       Comments: I strongly oppose demolishing of the Parks Recreation Bldg which serves our community very well and is well designed and pls keep the green space as well. This all fits in very well with Myers Park and Cascades Park into our neighborhood. If you need to do any changes, then pls only where the Easter Seal Center was located and have the design of the new buildings fit into our Historical District. Thank you very much for considering our wishes. Brigitte McKenzie 850-224 6743 or email: [email protected]

From: To: Subject: Date:

Bryant, Cherie (Planning) White, Artie FW: Sound Barrier Monday, November 21, 2016 3:09:20 PM

    From: Tedder, Wayne Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 11:51 PM To: Eduardo Robles Cc: Bryant, Cherie (Planning); Wilcox, Barry; Singleton, Lauren; Donahoe, Judy Subject: Re: Sound Barrier

Lalo, It is great hearing from you. Please understand that the concept was only a quick attempt to show some possibilities such as brownstones could serve as a wall, a mixture of uses should occur, and identify some thoughts as to what kind of density could occur on the site. In short, staff felt a 30' tall wall the length of a football field was not an appropriate urban design solution to the issue. We are working on a process that will guide a plan that fits should the City continue to pursue some redevelopment on the site. I am interested in your thoughts and would like Lauren to set up a brief meeting for us to meet if that approach is good for you. Thanks for reaching out. Wayne Tedder City of Tallahassee Assistant City Manager Development Services and Economic Vitality (850)891-8328 On Nov 18, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Eduardo Robles wrote: Hello Wayne:   Yesterday I was at the Tallahassee Trust for Historic Preservation meeting.  Part of the informal discussion was about the "Sound Barrier" that is proposed for the Cascades park noise problem.  Today I looked at the plan and I see their concern.  The solution is not creative.  You could have used the Urban Design studio at FAMU to generate a lot of ideas.  Think about it for the next time.   There is a very simple solution to the problem but it requires a change of perspective, and a strong commitment from the City.  If you are interested in hearing about it get in touch with me.   Best  

Lalo Robles

From: To: Subject: Date:

Bryant, Cherie (Planning) Wilcox, Barry; White, Artie FW: Amendment #PCM201706 to Comp Plan, Rezoning of Myerâ?Ts Park Parcel Monday, November 21, 2016 3:09:04 PM

-----Original Message----From: Tedder, Wayne Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 11:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Amendment #PCM201706 to Comp Plan, Rezoning of Myerâ?Ts Park Parcel Mr. Ehlmann, I wanted to address your statements regarding my presentation being deceptive. The engineer's report clearly indicated that the vegetation between the railroad tracks and the wall would be removed.  I will be glad to provide you the report if needed.  Additionally, given the wall construction type and required location, trees cannot be planted between the wall and the railroad tracks.  The wall concept was massive and would be clearly visible from multiple vantage points. I stand behind that assertion. Should the City approve any development on the site, it should be positioned in a manner that meets or exceeds the benefits estimated from the sound wall. Additionally, the housing would have to fit into the historic fabric of the neighborhood and be approved by the Architecture Review Board (ARB).  This is a significant process that is not required in most other areas throughout the City. This step alone should provide significant protections for the neighborhood. I hope this provides some additional clarity to your concerns. Thanks, Wayne Tedder City of Tallahassee Assistant City Manager Development Services and Economic Vitality (850)891-8328 > On Nov 19, 2016, at 1:42 PM, Bryan Desloge wrote: > > Bryon, thank you for contacting me about this issue and providing the detail you offer.  This comp plan amendment will come before the City and County with our next review and I've attached the schedule of meetings for your consideration.  As you will note, the Planning Department held an Open House Thursday afternoon to take comment from the public on the proposed plan.    I'm forwarding your email to the Planning Department so that your comments will be entered as a part of the public record. > Although this will come before both the City and County Commission's, the City will have jurisdiction. > > Without doubt this is going to be a highly controversial project because we're also receiving requests to approve the project, some to alter, as well as those against it.  I assure you I will take your comments, and those  received from others, into consideration in my deliberations when the amendment is sent to the County Commission.  Hope all's well with you!  Happy Thanksgiving! > > Bryan Desloge > Leon County Commission > District IV Commissioner > 301 S. Monroe St.

> Tallahassee, Fl.  32301 > 850-606-5364 > [email protected] > > >>>> 11/18/2016 4:01 PM >>> > FROM:"Bryon and Barbara Ehlmann > > My wife and I strongly oppose this amendment for the following reasons: > > 1. The amendment was proposed based on a deceptive presentation by Wayne Tedder to City Commissioners likely resulting in false misconceptions on the part of city commissioners â?"specifically, 1) that a 30 ft. sound wall would be ugly and obtrusive when viewed from Cascades Park when in fact this sound wall would be mostly hidden from view by trees aligning both sides of the railroad track and could be made attractive and almost invisible with appropriate façade and landscaping and 2) that development of the property proposed for rezoning would provide abatement from occasional amphitheater noise when in fact such abatement is questionable and such development would cause more noise in general, not just occasionally with concert performances but day in and day out, by increasing traffic on neighborhood streets. > > If surrounding residents could choose between A) development of this property, B) neither development nor a sound wall, or C) only a sound wall, they would resoundingly reject A)! > > 2. This property is currently being productively used by the city and is thus not â?osurplus landâ?  that can be sold.  No plans have been put forward concerning any new locations for the P&R offices, the Myers Park neighborhood meeting and polling place, and the park maintenance facilities.  Until such plans are made, this property should not be rezoned and sold.  Instead, it should be preserved for present and future city use. > > It certainly appears that private development interests are behind this amendment and the wheels that have been turning so far to push this amendment forward have not be turning in the sunshine. > > 3. The high density zoning is inconsistent with the Myers Park Historical District designation. > > 4. Given that Gaines St. was closed off by Cascades Park, the only ingress/regress to and from this property is via neighborhood streetsâ?"Myers Park Dr., Circle Dr., Santa Rosa Dr., and E. Van Buren St.  Also, significantly more traffic will result on E. Lafayette St.  Thus, with high density development, too much traffic will result these streets. > > 5. Any townhouses built along the railroad tracks will experience extreme noise and vibration when trains pass.  Who would want to live there? > > 6. Absolutely no justification has been given to rezone and bulldoze over the P&R office complex along with its many large, mature trees. > > An infill strategy to hinder urban sprawl should not give license to develop publicly owned green space within the city.  To do so will defeat the objective of such strategy as more and more city residents will move to the suburbs.  â?oInfillâ?  should mean redevelop and building up not out, it should not mean the plundering of city parks and public green spaces. > > If a radical amendment such as this can be so readily made to the comp plan â?"a change that ignores historical district designation and allows productively used, citizen-owned land to be sold for private profitâ?"then the comp plan is not worth the paper it is written on. > > > > --> This message sent from the Leon County Website: www.leoncountyfl.gov >

Artie  White   Tallahassee-­‐Leon  County  Planning  Department   ATTN:    Comprehensive  Planning  Division   300  South  Adams  Street   Tallahassee,  FL  32301     Dear  Mr.  White,     Thank  you  for  your  notice  concerning  Amendment  #PCM201706  to  amend  the   FLUM  designation  of  the  PRNA  offices  from  OS  to  CU  and  to  request  a  zoning  change     from  RP-­‐2  to  CU-­‐12    to  implement  the  proposed  amendment.     My  husband  and  I  are  affected  persons  who  live  on  property  we  own  within  1000   feet  of  the  PRNA  tract.    Our  address  is  534  Oakland  Avenue.     I  oppose  the  proposed  map  amendment  and  the  rezoning  of  the  9-­‐acre  property  for   several  reasons.     1.  The  Electric  Substation  and  the  PRNA  site  are  surrounded  by  OS  and  RP-­‐2   designations.      There  is  no  CU  zoning  adjacent  to  either  area.    The  Electric   Substation,  if  rezoned,  should  reflect  its  use,  GO,  government  operational.     2.  The  PRNA  site  is  a  part  of  the  Myers  Park  Residential  Historic  District  and  of   Myers  Park,  which  is  a  key  component  of  the  district.    OS  and  RP-­‐2  are  appropriate   designations  for  the  area.    The  green  space  defines  the  district  as  much  as  the   historic  single-­‐family  home  and  historic  duplexes  that  characterize  it.    If  there   should  ever  be  housing  anywhere  on  the  site,  it  should  follow  the  RP-­‐2  density  in   place.     3.    The  thoughtfully  and  beautifully  designed  PRNA  complex,  the  mature  trees,  and   the  Open  Space  on  the  site  support  the  historic  sense  of  place  protected  by  the   Historic  Preservation  Overlay.    Albert  Trull’s  “Sesquicentennial”  building  should  be   kept  in  public  use  and  surrounded  by  its  character-­‐defining  canopy.      4.  The  current  low  density  residential  zoning  is  consistent  with  the  city’s  definition   of  a  “Residential  Historic  District,”  which  states  that  such  a  district  has  an   underlying  low-­‐density  residential  zoning.      CU  zoning  is  wholly  inappropriate  in   such  a  district  and  will  lead  to  its  undoing.      5.  Housing  values  have  gone  up  in  the  Myers  Park  Historic  District  as  renovations   following  the  guidelines  for  historic  rehabilitation  have  been  implemented.  A  State   of  Florida  publication,  “Economic  Impacts  of  Historic  Preservation  in  Florida,   Update  2010”  cited  the  Myers  Park  District  as  having  a  greater  increase  in  value   than  a  comparison  area,  Old  Town,  and  Leon  County  between  2001  and  2009.    Jeff   Drake  has  updated,  rehabilitated,  and  resold  5  houses  within  the  District,  most  of  

them  since  2009.    Owners  of  3  other  homes  within  just  a  block  of  our  residence  have   also  recently  undertaken  multi-­‐hundred  thousand  dollars  of  upgrades.     6.  New  families  with  young  children  are  moving  into  the  district  because  of  the   historic  preservation  regulations  and  all  the  amenities,  old  and  new,  that  are  unique   to  this  neighborhood.    More  families  will  do  so  unless  CU  zoning  changes  the   residential  profile  of  the  area.      Such  a  change  would  be  unfair  to  both  the  families   who  have  invested  in  their  homes  for  many  years  as  well  as  those  who  have  moved   here  to  enjoy  a  quality  of  life  now  threatened  by  urbanization  of  their  neighborhood.     Thank  you  for  considering  these  concerns,     Valerie  Jean  Conner   534  Oakland  Avenue   Tallahassee,  Fl,  32301            

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Thursday, November 24, 2016 3:44:59 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Laura Last Name: Arpan Street Address: 1229 Clark Ave. City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am writing to oppose the rezoning/high density housing proposal for the current site of the Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs buildings (PCM201706). The PRNA site/community center is an architectural and neighborhood treasure. Additionally, given recent traffic alterations in and around the neighborhood (necessitated by Cascades Park), I believe a high density building on the site would overwhelm the neighborhood entrances near the site.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:33:10 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Donna Last Name: Heald Street Address: 1333 South Meridian City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am opposed to this development because I think it will increase congestion and traffic, and will negatively affect the atmasphere and character of our historic neighborhood. Removal of the Parks&Rec buildings will remove meeting space currently available to the adjacent neighborhoods. The idea that housing, which will very likely be rental and student, will increase our property values, is unfounded and unverified. If the city can afford $7.2 mil for a footbridge, it can surely afford to build a sound barrier. There are, btw, examples online of decorative walls, using plants, lighting, bas relief, mosaic tile, etc. it might even be an opportunity for "art in public places." I hope that the commission will give consideration to the Myers Park Neighborhood's "sense of place". Thank you

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Wednesday, November 23, 2016 8:31:40 AM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Donna Marie Last Name: Nudd Street Address: 1402 South Meridian Street City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: We (Donna Marie Nudd and Terry Galloway) own a home in Myers Park, we plan to retire here. We very much appreciate that we live in a historical district. And we walk Cascade Park every day. We also bike over the bridge over Monroe at least once a week. And we also appreciate the city putting in speed bumps on South Meridian street. In short, we have been overall very pleased with what the city has done to improve life in Myers Park area. We (Terry and Donna) have now attended three different meetings to learn about and express our serious concerns about the high density town house/business solution to the neighbourhood sound problem. Here is a list of our concerns. 1) Green space is precious and much desired in downtown areas. It is critical we keep all of it. 2) Myers Park is a historical district. We need to keep our community center where we vote because of its historical significance. 3) We resented the unbalanced presentation given at the City Commission meeting by the City Planner. As I (Donna) noted during the public hearing; it isn't a fair and balanced presentation when the visual rhetoric of the powerpoint shows-- A) what we remember were four or five ugly or unsuitable sound barrier walls and only one or two aesthetically pleasing one(s) with a negative qualifier, such as "proposed Tallahassee sound wall would be much much higher"; B) photos of a series of current dilapidated buildings on the premises and no photos of the over 100 mature trees (of at least 6 different varieties) C) photos of adorable town houses with geraniums in pots but no photos of the 383 parking spaces and the obvious traffic problems. 3) No actual evidence has been presented that shows that the town house development actually works to mitigate the sound. 4) If these high density housing exist in other cities next to major sound problems--what type of people buy or rent there? Currently our neighbourhood is a marvellous mix of single family homes, duplexes, apartment complexes etc. The students who live here tend to be graduate students who respect the neighbourhood. It is easy to assume the only people who would buy or rent next to a bandshell are going to be undergraduates or deaf senior citizens. But that is my guess. Can you please study what type of people rent or buy housing in these high density areas with major sound problems? (We sold our first house on Amelia Circle, because as developers increasingly rented out to undergraduates, the student renters left huge piles of trash on the street and there were continual calls to the city police because of high volume of stereos at parties.) 5) If there were tons of meetings/studies years ago NOT to continue Gaines Street straight but rather wind it around Cascades why would you now offer high density housing which is going to create major traffic problems in the neighbourhood? (382

parking spaces, means 382 cars!) 6) Beyond the problem with excessive cars, what about the bikers who come through Woodlawn to go over the Monroe bridge, how can you ensure their safety with that much more traffic? Please take each of these concerns very seriously. Donna Marie Nudd and Terry Galloway

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, November 20, 2016 11:58:12 AM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: John Piers Last Name: Rawling Street Address: 1320 Golf Terrace Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: As President of the Myers Park Neighborhood Association, I have pasted, at the end of my comments, our neighborhood’s position statement on proposal PCM201706. However, I have many other concerns and questions. For example, who would be willing to live in housing next to a railway line that is also serving as a noise barrier? How effective a sound barrier would this development be? What would happen if the developer were to go bankrupt? These issues arose at the planning meeting on Nov 17, 2016, as did many others, three of which I’ll now address. (1) In response to the question of CU12 zoning being out of place in the Myers Park neighborhood, it was claimed that on the edge of our neighborhood the issue of re-zoning is less pressing because of varied zoning beyond our borders. But if the parcel in question is zoned CU-12, then the edge of the Myers Park neighborhood is thereby effectively moved inward, which, according to this reasoning, makes the case for another CU-12 zoned parcel yet further inward. And on it would go. In the staff recommendations it is claimed that a sound wall is out of keeping with our historic district, but CU-12 zoning of portions of the district is far more so. (2) It was rightly noted that planning decisions have to take into account the good of future generations, and it was argued that this rezoning and subsequent redevelopment would somehow promote that good. This strikes me as incorrect. The proposed redevelopment would be irreversible. If it turns out to be needed in the future, it can always be done. But it can never be undone. (3) It has been suggested, by both staff and city commissioners, that the Architectural Review Board (ARB) would serve to protect the historic nature of our neighborhood. But my understanding is that the role of the ARB vis-à-vis proposal PCM201706 is unclear. At best, it seems that its members would have a simple up or down vote on those aspects of the design of the proposed redevelopment visible from public rights of way. But they have no say in such matters as: the sale of the parcel, its re-zoning, the destruction of the community center and PRNA offices, the destruction of the parcel’s natural habitat and trees, the number of units to be built upon parcel, or where they are to be built upon it. Myers Park Neighborhood Association Position Statement on Proposed Rezoning & Redevelopment of PRNA Administrative Offices and surrounding green/public space (PCM201706): The Myers Park Neighborhood Association supports and encourages the responsible redevelopment of under-utilized built-up property, and unused private property, when this is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning. The Association understands the perils of urban sprawl, and the desirability of responsible infill. However, the Myers Park Neighborhood Association, as a

matter of public policy, opposes opportunistic changes to the Comprehensive Plan, and spot zoning. • The Comprehensive Plan and zoning constitute a fiduciary relationship between the government and the citizens whereby citizens purchase property, pay taxes on that property for many years, and make improvements to their property with the expectation that the government will protect their property and investment. • The Comprehensive Plan and zoning should be used to guide development on a long-term and large-scale basis. Changes to them should not be made on a parcel-wise or small-area incremental basis to the advantage of a few, and to the disadvantage of the many impacted neighbors. The Myers Park Neighborhood Association also opposes, as a matter of public policy, the sale and development of public open-space and recreational land. The Association particularly opposes the sale and development of the City Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Affairs office parcel. • The parcel is designated as Open Space in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; it is designated as park land by the city-owned on-line property mapping application; and it links two signature parks: Myers and Cascades. Such green park space is a precious and unrenewable city resource. It should be retained by the public for the benefit of current and future generations. • In addition, foliage and parks are a primary noteworthy characteristic of Tallahassee, and are often cited as a key attribute in bringing people into our community. Destroying a part of our park system is short-sighted, and inconsistent with both our values and our continued attractiveness. • The City Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Affairs office complex is an important part of the City legacy and serves vital public and neighborhood purposes. Furthermore, it is heavily used, and thus, under existing city policy, it cannot be considered as surplus, and therefore cannot be sold (City Commission Policy 136 - Real Property - 136.13). • The Association understands a change of the above-mentioned city policy is being considered, in part to facilitate the sale of this parcel. Such an opportunistic sale of public park land is a violation of the public trust.

From: To: Subject: Date:

Tedder, Wayne [email protected] Re: Amendment #PCM201706 to Comp Plan, Rezoning of Myerâ?Ts Park Parcel Saturday, November 19, 2016 11:30:34 PM

Mr. Ehlmann, I wanted to address your statements regarding my presentation being deceptive. The engineer's report clearly indicated that the vegetation between the railroad tracks and the wall would be removed.  I will be glad to provide you the report if needed.  Additionally, given the wall construction type and required location, trees cannot be planted between the wall and the railroad tracks.  The wall concept was massive and would be clearly visible from multiple vantage points. I stand behind that assertion. Should the City approve any development on the site, it should be positioned in a manner that meets or exceeds the benefits estimated from the sound wall. Additionally, the housing would have to fit into the historic fabric of the neighborhood and be approved by the Architecture Review Board (ARB).  This is a significant process that is not required in most other areas throughout the City. This step alone should provide significant protections for the neighborhood. I hope this provides some additional clarity to your concerns. Thanks, Wayne Tedder City of Tallahassee Assistant City Manager Development Services and Economic Vitality (850)891-8328 > On Nov 19, 2016, at 1:42 PM, Bryan Desloge wrote: > > Bryon, thank you for contacting me about this issue and providing the detail you offer.  This comp plan amendment will come before the City and County with our next review and I've attached the schedule of meetings for your consideration.  As you will note, the Planning Department held an Open House Thursday afternoon to take comment from the public on the proposed plan.    I'm forwarding your email to the Planning Department so that your comments will be entered as a part of the public record. > Although this will come before both the City and County Commission's, the City will have jurisdiction. > > Without doubt this is going to be a highly controversial project because we're also receiving requests to approve the project, some to alter, as well as those against it.  I assure you I will take your comments, and those  received from others, into consideration in my deliberations when the amendment is sent to the County Commission.  Hope all's well with you!  Happy Thanksgiving! > > Bryan Desloge > Leon County Commission > District IV Commissioner > 301 S. Monroe St. > Tallahassee, Fl.  32301 > 850-606-5364 > [email protected] > > >>>> 11/18/2016 4:01 PM >>> > FROM:"Bryon and Barbara Ehlmann > > My wife and I strongly oppose this amendment for the following reasons: >

> 1. The amendment was proposed based on a deceptive presentation by Wayne Tedder to City Commissioners likely resulting in false misconceptions on the part of city commissioners â?"specifically, 1) that a 30 ft. sound wall would be ugly and obtrusive when viewed from Cascades Park when in fact this sound wall would be mostly hidden from view by trees aligning both sides of the railroad track and could be made attractive and almost invisible with appropriate façade and landscaping and 2) that development of the property proposed for rezoning would provide abatement from occasional amphitheater noise when in fact such abatement is questionable and such development would cause more noise in general, not just occasionally with concert performances but day in and day out, by increasing traffic on neighborhood streets. > > If surrounding residents could choose between A) development of this property, B) neither development nor a sound wall, or C) only a sound wall, they would resoundingly reject A)! > > 2. This property is currently being productively used by the city and is thus not â?osurplus landâ?  that can be sold.  No plans have been put forward concerning any new locations for the P&R offices, the Myers Park neighborhood meeting and polling place, and the park maintenance facilities.  Until such plans are made, this property should not be rezoned and sold.  Instead, it should be preserved for present and future city use. > > It certainly appears that private development interests are behind this amendment and the wheels that have been turning so far to push this amendment forward have not be turning in the sunshine. > > 3. The high density zoning is inconsistent with the Myers Park Historical District designation. > > 4. Given that Gaines St. was closed off by Cascades Park, the only ingress/regress to and from this property is via neighborhood streetsâ?"Myers Park Dr., Circle Dr., Santa Rosa Dr., and E. Van Buren St.  Also, significantly more traffic will result on E. Lafayette St.  Thus, with high density development, too much traffic will result these streets. > > 5. Any townhouses built along the railroad tracks will experience extreme noise and vibration when trains pass.  Who would want to live there? > > 6. Absolutely no justification has been given to rezone and bulldoze over the P&R office complex along with its many large, mature trees. > > An infill strategy to hinder urban sprawl should not give license to develop publicly owned green space within the city.  To do so will defeat the objective of such strategy as more and more city residents will move to the suburbs.  â?oInfillâ?  should mean redevelop and building up not out, it should not mean the plundering of city parks and public green spaces. > > If a radical amendment such as this can be so readily made to the comp plan â?"a change that ignores historical district designation and allows productively used, citizen-owned land to be sold for private profitâ?"then the comp plan is not worth the paper it is written on. > > > > --> This message sent from the Leon County Website: www.leoncountyfl.gov >

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

Bryan Desloge [email protected] Bryant, Cherie (Planning); Calhoun, Sherri; Tedder, Wayne Re: Amendment #PCM201706 to Comp Plan, Rezoning of Myerâ?Ts Park Parcel Saturday, November 19, 2016 1:42:51 PM

Bryon, thank you for contacting me about this issue and providing the detail you offer.  This comp plan amendment will come before the City and County with our next review and I've attached the schedule of meetings for your consideration.  As you will note, the Planning Department held an Open House Thursday afternoon to take comment from the public on the proposed plan.    I'm forwarding your email to the Planning Department so that your comments will be entered as a part of the public record.  Although this will come before both the City and County Commission's, the City will have jurisdiction.    Without doubt this is going to be a highly controversial project because we're also receiving requests to approve the project, some to alter, as well as those against it.  I assure you I will take your comments, and those  received from others, into consideration in my deliberations when the amendment is sent to the County Commission.  Hope all's well with you!  Happy Thanksgiving! Bryan Desloge Leon County Commission District IV Commissioner 301 S. Monroe St. Tallahassee, Fl.  32301 850-606-5364 [email protected] >>> 11/18/2016 4:01 PM >>> FROM:"Bryon and Barbara Ehlmann My wife and I strongly oppose this amendment for the following reasons: 1. The amendment was proposed based on a deceptive presentation by Wayne Tedder to City Commissioners likely resulting in false misconceptions on the part of city commissioners â?"specifically, 1) that a 30 ft. sound wall would be ugly and obtrusive when viewed from Cascades Park when in fact this sound wall would be mostly hidden from view by trees aligning both sides of the railroad track and could be made attractive and almost invisible with appropriate façade and landscaping and 2) that development of the property proposed for rezoning would provide abatement from occasional amphitheater noise when in fact such abatement is questionable and such development would cause more noise in general, not just occasionally with concert performances but day in and day out, by increasing traffic on neighborhood streets. If surrounding residents could choose between A) development of this property, B) neither development nor a sound wall, or C) only a sound wall, they would resoundingly reject A)! 2. This property is currently being productively used by the city and is thus not â?osurplus landâ?  that can be sold.  No plans have been put forward concerning any new locations for the P&R offices, the Myers Park neighborhood meeting and polling place, and the park maintenance facilities.  Until such plans are made, this property should not be rezoned and sold.  Instead, it should be preserved for present and future city use. It certainly appears that private development interests are behind this amendment and the wheels that have been turning so far to push this amendment forward have not be turning in the sunshine. 3. The high density zoning is inconsistent with the Myers Park Historical District designation. 4. Given that Gaines St. was closed off by Cascades Park, the only ingress/regress to and from this property is via neighborhood streetsâ?"Myers Park Dr., Circle Dr., Santa Rosa Dr., and E. Van Buren St.  Also, significantly more traffic will result on E. Lafayette St.  Thus, with high density development, too much traffic will result

these streets. 5. Any townhouses built along the railroad tracks will experience extreme noise and vibration when trains pass.  Who would want to live there? 6. Absolutely no justification has been given to rezone and bulldoze over the P&R office complex along with its many large, mature trees. An infill strategy to hinder urban sprawl should not give license to develop publicly owned green space within the city.  To do so will defeat the objective of such strategy as more and more city residents will move to the suburbs.  â?oInfillâ?  should mean redevelop and building up not out, it should not mean the plundering of city parks and public green spaces. If a radical amendment such as this can be so readily made to the comp plan â?"a change that ignores historical district designation and allows productively used, citizen-owned land to be sold for private profitâ? "then the comp plan is not worth the paper it is written on.

--This message sent from the Leon County Website: www.leoncountyfl.gov

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

Bryant, Cherie (Planning) Calhoun, Sherri White, Artie FW: Sound Barrier Monday, November 21, 2016 3:09:41 PM

For the amendment record.   From: Bryant, Cherie (Planning) Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 3:09 PM To: White, Artie Subject: FW: Sound Barrier

    From: Tedder, Wayne Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 11:51 PM To: Eduardo Robles Cc: Bryant, Cherie (Planning); Wilcox, Barry; Singleton, Lauren; Donahoe, Judy Subject: Re: Sound Barrier

Lalo, It is great hearing from you. Please understand that the concept was only a quick attempt to show some possibilities such as brownstones could serve as a wall, a mixture of uses should occur, and identify some thoughts as to what kind of density could occur on the site. In short, staff felt a 30' tall wall the length of a football field was not an appropriate urban design solution to the issue. We are working on a process that will guide a plan that fits should the City continue to pursue some redevelopment on the site. I am interested in your thoughts and would like Lauren to set up a brief meeting for us to meet if that approach is good for you. Thanks for reaching out. Wayne Tedder City of Tallahassee Assistant City Manager Development Services and Economic Vitality (850)891-8328 On Nov 18, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Eduardo Robles wrote: Hello Wayne:   Yesterday I was at the Tallahassee Trust for Historic Preservation meeting.  Part of the informal discussion was about the "Sound Barrier" that is proposed for the Cascades park noise problem.  Today I looked at the plan and I see their concern.  The solution is not creative.  You could have used the Urban Design studio at FAMU to generate a lot of ideas.  Think about it for the next time.

  There is a very simple solution to the problem but it requires a change of perspective, and a strong commitment from the City.  If you are interested in hearing about it get in touch with me.   Best   Lalo Robles

Nov. 19, 2016 Mr. Artie White Comprehensive Planning Division Tallahassee-Leon County Comprehensive Commission Mr. White

RE: Amend. # PCM201706

Because of illness, I was unable to attend the workshop held for neighbors and interested persons on November 17 concerning the above cited Comprehensive Plan Amendment.

As a 20 year resident of Myers Park I live within 1000 feet of the proposed amendment. I am, I might also add, the holder of a City Planning Degree from the University of Virginia, a PhD from Columbia University, and have years of experience in related problem areas. I thus have more than an amateur interest in what is here proposed.

From an urban planning perspective, relying on privately developed housing to act in stead of the much bruited wall seems to be a poor decision at best. Specifically, if sound mitigation is indeed the goal of the rezoning and development of the land, it is both simpler and more economical for the community as a whole to simply improve the sound system as suggested by the consultant acoustic engineers some while back.

Surely the use of private housing as a sound barrier is not an appropriate planning technique, and may even be an unethical one, if the goal of community planning is the welfare of the community rather than the exploitation of residents. In addition to locate housing immediately adjacent to a railroad, as well as next to an electrical substation and a cellphone tower, shows an indifference to elementary studio rules of design. I believe many spokespersons for the community have already raised what modern ecologically aware planners take as scripture. To surrender publicly owned open space to private economic interests is a frankly opposed to community welfare. No matter what the advantages of a bit more revenue for the city’s budget, to throw away the space needed for a city to breathe clean oxygen, to surrender the future recreational and relaxation needs of the community, and to destroy green space in the heart of the community is never justified. Frederick Law Olmsted must be spinning in his grave. If our “vision” of Tallahassee is no more refined than an overbuilt city we need to rethink our vision.

Without raising the additional points of protecting the one Residential Historic District the city has created (even Gainesville FL has five historic districts many of which are residential) and the potential harmful effects to an established and thriving neighborhood, the proposal is a bad idea.

I trust that you, the staff of the Tallahassee-Leon Planning Commission, the Commission itself, and the City Commission all recognize the flaws in this proposal and leave the Parks and Recreation parcel in its present zoning category of RP-2. Sincerely yours S. J. Makielski 534 Oakland Ave Tallahassee Fl 32301

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Tuesday, November 29, 2016 12:34:13 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Martha Last Name: Peele Street Address: 439 Shephard St City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32303 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I attended the First Public Open House on November 17, 2016. Although I do not live in the Myers Park area, it is a park I have been delighted to use over the last 30 years. My main concern is to take open space, park land and change it to Central Urban is a dangerous precedent to set. I also feel that there is a lot of current Central Urban housing that is vacant. Open space, park land is what makes a city desirable and keeps property values strong. I will be continuing to follow this issue and feel certain that the planning staff will do thorough research to make recommendations for the sustainable growth of Tallahassee and resolve the noise mitigation. Thank you for allowing me to make my feelings heard. Respectfully Martha Peele

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Monday, December 05, 2016 9:54:14 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Andrew Opel Last Name: Opel Street Address: 296 Champions Way, University City: Talahassee State: Florida Zip: 32306-2664 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: As a resident of the Woodland Drives neighborhood and a rational person, I want to express my opposition to the housing development along the CSX/City parcel by Cascade Park Amphitheater. The proposal is not in character with the neighborhood AND is extremely close to the RR tracks where trains pass through every night between 3-4am, blowing horns multiple times. There is a reason there are no residences along the tracks - no one wants to live that close. We live a mile away and the train wakes me up many times a week. No one is going to pay good money for condos/apartments that close to the train. Period. This entire issue comes from the poor siting of the amphitheater. The development money would be better spent rebuilding the amphitheater to face the downtown where there are few residences that would be disturbed by the few events held. Please reconsider your plans. Sincerely, Andy Opel

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Monday, December 05, 2016 9:55:10 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Andrew Opel Last Name: Opel Street Address: 1902 Old Fort Drive City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Sorry. auto fill put in my professional address on the previous comment - this is my home address. Andy Opel

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Monday, December 05, 2016 7:00:36 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Judith Last Name: Rainbrook Street Address: 1525 Heechee Nene City: Tallahassee State: Fl Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Concerns about Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices (PCM201706) Parcel The buildings in this area were dedicated to celebrate the City's Sesquicentennial on January 28, 1975. And now, less than 40 years later, the City is proposing to re-zone the property and sell to a developer which will likely result in the destruction of these important structures. This public space is heavily used and well-loved. The City's staff feasibility report states the site was used for 388 meetings this past year. It houses the offices for the Director of Recreation, Parks and Neighborhood Affairs, including maintenance facilities used to operate Cascades and Myers Park. It also serves an important community function by serving as the voting location for two different precincts. Moreover, fronting a single-family, park like area with high density,multi-story housing will destroy the very historic and parklike nature of this area. The plan should be something that will join the Myers Park lands to the park atmosphere of the Cascades. Poor planning in putting a band shell facing a single-family residential neighborhood should not be exacerbated by destroying the Myers Park beauty. Enclosing the band shell would make much more sense and cost far less in the end.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Tuesday, December 06, 2016 8:18:20 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Lori Breningmeyer Last Name: Breningmeyer Street Address: 1211 Seminole Drive City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: We have lived in Woodland Drives for close to twenty years and we love our neighborhood. We're quite concerned about the character of the neighborhood changing if over 100 residential units are built where the Parks and Rec center now resides. The increased traffic, noise, run off, etc... will demonstrably change the experience of living here. We understand that the property is valuable and possibly needs to become residential, but with a far lower number of units. A number that's comparable to what now exists on a similarly sized parcel throughout the rest of the neighborhood. Cascades Park, Myers Park, and Woodland Drives should be enjoyed by all Tallahasseeans, but their character needs to be maintained - not sold to the highest bidder.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Tuesday, December 06, 2016 4:49:29 PM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Dan Last Name: Marelli Street Address: 1119 Clark Avenue City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Selling the parcel in Meyers Park that contains the Park and Rec office is a terrible idea. This is a historic neighborhood and this property does a great deal to maintain the flavor and character of the neighborhood. Beyond that the high-density residential parcel created by this move would further degrade the character of the Myers Park - Woodland Drives area and increase neighborhood vehicle traffic. My wife and I are firmly opposed to this plan.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Wednesday, December 07, 2016 11:25:26 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Barbara Last Name: Hamby Street Address: 1168 Seminole Drive City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: We have a beautiful downtown neighborhood that is at a tipping point. Residential development on this site would be a mistake comparable to the amphitheater facing the neighborhood. No one is going to buy apartments that have trains running through their bedrooms at 2 a.m., 4 a.m., and 6 a.m. This will be student rental apartments, and will mean 2000 extra car trips through the neighborhood. This means danger for children, older persons, and pets. Why not try something historic and beautiful, such as a continuation of the Smokey Hollow park.That historic neighborhood was destroyed because of "progress." Please don't destroy our neighborhood. The trees and other wildlife cannot be replaced.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:16:41 AM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Arthur Last Name: Raney Street Address: 1229 Clark Avenue City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: As a resident of the adjacent Woodland Drives neighborhood, I am deeply troubled by and concerned with the proposed development of the Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices (PCM201706). I strongly oppose the rezoning application. I have followed the public discussions closely and have seen no convincing evidence that the market can support such a development (especially in light of the low occupancy rates of the similarly located and targeted downtown condo projects). Further, the infrastructure (particular roads) in the area recently renovated for the Cascade Park project is clearly (at least to those who use it every day) insufficient for any added load. Also, the implied argument that someone's new home would serve as a sound barrier for those Myers Park residents currently living near Cascades is illogical. How would placing a development nearer the park address noise concerns of residents? Even if the current Myers Park residents were no longer "bothered" by the noise, wouldn't anyone/everyone living in the proposed new development be bothered? And, with regard to noise, no evidence has been offered to show that the market exists for expensive housing that sits on a heavily and continually (i.e., aroundthe-clock) used railroad track, built between two road crossings, which come with federal regulations for train operators to blow their horns 24 hours per day. There is a reason why the current housing in Myers Park nearest the train track is among the lowest valued: the noise. No evidence has been presented that suggests that you can place some of the highest valued property in the area even closer to the tracks and potential buyers will not mind. Finally, the City of Tallahassee has a longstanding commitment to providing public green spaces and preserving the historic integrity of the area. Approving the rezoning application of PCM201706 would flight directly in the face of that commitment. For these reasons, as a resident of the area and a citizen of Tallahassee, I strongly and unequivocally oppose the rezoning application of PCM201706.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:14:38 AM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Mary Last Name: Frederick Street Address: 805 Circle Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I can sum up my personal feelings succinctly: How would YOU feel if you made the biggest investment of your life--buying your home in a historic neighborhood with R-2 zoning--with trust in the local government to keep that zoning, only to find that the City planners and leaders want to upend that trust—and your investment? Picture yourself opening the front door of your historic home in R-2 zoning to see a CU-12 development across the street. I bet you would NEVER approve such a thing if it were in YOUR neighborhood. Why the heck do you want to do it to ours?

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Friday, December 09, 2016 8:32:40 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Ramona Last Name: Abernathy-Paine Street Address: 2006 E. Indianhead Drive City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I understand the need to change the designation of the cityowned property at 912 Myers Park Drive. I understand that including this property in the residential preservation designation of the surrounding neighborhood was the best move at the time, but no longer appropriate. I do not object to changing the designation. I do however object to selling the property. I also object to building apartments on the property to avoid the expense of building the sound controlling wall that was promised to the neighborhood. If the expense of such a wall is so prohibitive, here's a very low cost solution. Go back to the "acoustical only" performances that were promised when the amphitheater design was moved to its current location with sound channeled into the neighborhood.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Friday, December 09, 2016 10:22:35 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Robert Last Name: OLary Street Address: 2311 jim Lee Road City: Tallahassee State: fl Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Please do NOT re-zone the Meyers Park parcel. I MUCH prefer it stays as it is presently zoned. FIX the noise at the Amphitheatre by affecting change on THAT property, NOT by reaching farther inside Meyers Park for the solution. DO NOT re-zone.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Saturday, December 10, 2016 11:42:46 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Tracee Last Name: Strohman Street Address: 1508 Heechee Nene City: Tlh State: Fl Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am against the rezoning of the parks and rec property in Myers Park. Can we please draw the line on MAXIMIZING the few pockets of space and quiet in and around our neighborhoods? I know with Cascades Park so closeby the city could take in more $$ but can we please resist the temptation? Quality of life is better option than noise pollution and traffic. Thank-you.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Saturday, December 10, 2016 8:34:15 PM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Rodney Last Name: MacKinnon Street Address: 913 E. Call Street City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: My wife and I are very opposed to the sale of the Myers Park Parks & Rec parcel to developers. This is very short-sighted - a momentary dash of revenue in exchange for a long-term loss of the Myers Park neighborhood and parkland for your bosses, the citizens of Tallahassee. For this to happen in a city as progressive as Tallahassee is a disgrace.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, December 11, 2016 3:30:55 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Claudia Last Name: Scholz Street Address: 1622 Seminole Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I strongly oppose the rezoning of the Parks and Recreation Dept land in Myers Park for high-density housing. As it is now, it's a lovely wooded plot of land appropriate to and contiguous with Cascades Park. The wood frame buildings are in keeping with the one-storey, single-family homes of Myers Park, Woodland Drives and the Indianhead neighborhoods. New, highdensity housing would not be in keeping with the historical nature of the Myers Park neighborhood or the immediate environs of the Parks and Recreation Dept's current site. Why isn't South Monroe being considered as a good location for high-density housing? It desperately needs a makeover and has the road to support the traffic resulting from many new residents and it is close to Cascades Park as well as to the downtown area. Please leave the historical Myers Park neighborhood as it is, preserving one of the oldest neighborhoods in Tallahassee.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, December 11, 2016 5:40:12 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Shelly Last Name: Herman Street Address: 1412 Green Street City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32303 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am writing in opposition to the rezoning of the parcel of land that holds the Parks and Rec offices. This parcel of land is so beautiful and helps add to Tallahassee's beauty. The Parks and Rec office is such a unique and beautiful building and really sets a nice entrance to Meyers Park and backdrop of Cascades. While I understand development and growth are vital to our city, I urge you to do it in a way that protects our community, history and tree’s. I believe turning this parcel into multi-family homes will not only ruin this area of town, it will set a precedent that the City of Tallahassee only cares about development and money, and not about keeping our city beautiful, charming and unique.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Monday, December 12, 2016 9:11:49 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Barbara Last Name: Hamby Street Address: 1168 Seminole Drive City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301-4656 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I've written once before, but on Sunday I visited my friend Linda Hall who owns one of the shotgun houses that is the last of the old Smokey Hollow neighborhood on Marvin Street. She is an artist and uses the house as a studio. It is a charming street, and really gives a sense of what the neighborhood used to be. Next to Linda's house, someone has been buying property. There is a swath of grassy lawn that runs downhill to the railroad track on one side and Myers Park on the other side. This seems to me to be a golden opportunity to extend the Smokey Hollow commemoration of Cascades Park and create another award-winning inner-city green space. This could be our Central Park--a bucolic respite from the hard surfaces of the modern urban environment. I would encourage you to think about how beautiful this could be, not only for our neighborhood but for the city of Tallahassee at large.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Tuesday, December 13, 2016 1:41:18 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Brian Last Name: Inouye Street Address: 1123 Maple Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am opposed to rezoning this parcel to Central Urban [CU-12]. First, the parcel is not well suited to high density development. Its location on two roads that are the main access points for established neighborhoods and along bicycle commuting corridors would cause severe traffic problems and create difficult access to the new bridge over south Monroe. High density housing would be out of character with the surrounding neighborhoods of mostly single-family homes. Second, it is a bad precedent for the city to sell public park land for private development. While my preference is to leave the parcel as city parks and rec land, any housing development on the parcel should be in keeping with the nature of the surrounding neighborhood and restricted to much lower density. Keeping the parcel as part of the Myers & Cascades Park complex is, in my opinion, its best use.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

Bryan Desloge [email protected] Bryant, Cherie (Planning); Thomas, Debra; Calhoun, Sherri Re: Comp Plan PCM201706 Tuesday, December 13, 2016 4:42:17 PM

Thanks for contacting me, Jim and Cindy, regarding this proposed amendment.  The item has not yet come to the County Commission, so I have no idea yet what is proposed.  We will see the project when it is presented to the City and County during our review of the comp plan amendments.  As you may already know, the City owns the property and it's within the City limits thus they have jurisdiction over the project.   I'm forwarding your email to the Planning Department so that it can be included as a part of the public record.    I assure you I will take your comments, and those  received from others, into consideration in my deliberations when the amendment is sent to the County Commission.  Please don't hesitate to contact me if you feel I may be of help with other issues.  Hope all's well with you!  Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!   Bryan Desloge Leon County Commission District IV Commissioner 301 S. Monroe St. Tallahassee, Fl.  32301 850-606-5364 [email protected] >>> 12/10/2016 11:59 PM >>> FROM:"Cindy & Jim Cosper As residents of the Myers Park Historic District we are unhappy with the comp plan amend and rezoning proposal to sell and demolish the Parks&Rec offices 9 acres.  More discussion with neighbors is needed. --This message sent from the Leon County Website: www.leoncountyfl.gov

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Tuesday, December 13, 2016 5:30:49 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: John Last Name: Scholz Street Address: 1622 Seminole Drive City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: RE: Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices (PCM201706) If sound and saving money by not building a sound wall is the primary issue behind this rezoning, why not build the sound barrier right behind the auditorium. The closer the barrier the smaller (and cheaper) it would need to be. IN addition, a barrier that reflected most of the sound back into the auditorium would achieve higher sound levels for the audience with a lower stage sound level. Why not think of a more imaginative reflecting wall that might also add more seating by extending the current seating. Done appropriately, this could enhance the sound experience for a larger audience while reducing the unwanted sound that carries into the neighborhood.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Tuesday, December 13, 2016 10:25:33 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: David Kirby Last Name: Kirby Street Address: 1168 Seminole Drive City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Dear elected officials, I urge you to preserve our environmental and economic health by keeping the Easter Seals parcel as is and not selling it to a developer. The Woodland Drives / Myers Park area has been identified as a historic neighborhood; it would be destroyed if multiple residential units were constructed and the ensuing traffic (an estimated additional 2,000 car trips a day) resulted. As is, the area is a pristine link between Cascades Park and Myers Park, and it makes no sense to disrupt that natural flow of the landscape with an unsightly housing development, especially populated largely by students with no long-term ties to the area. Property values would plummet. The danger to children, cyclists, pets, the elderly, and pedestrians in general would increase tenfold. Over the years, Tallahassee has worked hard to preserve and enhance one of our most beautiful green areas, and we the residents trust you will not undo those efforts. Sale of the property might result in a quick profit, but the long-term economic effect would be disastrous, as would the damage to one of the still-beautiful areas on Tallahassee's south side. Thank you, David Kirby

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

Bryan Desloge [email protected] Bryant, Cherie (Planning); Thomas, Debra; Calhoun, Sherri Re: zoning - Urban Residential/R-4 in Killearn Estates Tuesday, December 13, 2016 3:22:11 PM

Beverly, thank you for the feedback!  This project is under the jurisdiction of the City although it will come before both Commissions through the comp plan review process in the next few months.  I'm forwarding your email to the Planning Department so that it can be included as a part of the public record.    Without doubt this is going to be a highly controversial project because we're also receiving requests to approve the project, some to alter, as well as those like yours who are not in favor of the project.  I assure you I will take your comments, and those  received from others, into consideration in my deliberations when the amendment is sent to the County Commission.  Please don't hesitate to contact me if you feel I may be of help with other issues.  Hope all's well with you!  Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Bryan Desloge Leon County Commission District IV Commissioner 301 S. Monroe St. Tallahassee, Fl.  32301 850-606-5364 [email protected] >>> 12/5/2016 9:56 AM >>> FROM:"Beverly DeGennaro As a resident of Killearn Estates, I formally oppose the Urban Residential/R-4 zoning application.  This plan of Mr. Tuck's will drastically impact the property values, traffic, schools and "neighborhood" feel of Killearn Estates.  This is inappropriate rezoning of property within our community and I implore you to prayerfully consider your decision. --This message sent from the Leon County Website: www.leoncountyfl.gov

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Wednesday, December 14, 2016 10:05:33 AM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Ann Last Name: Mazzanovich Street Address: 525 Hart Street City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Please do not re-zone this parcel for high density development! Our quiet historic neighborhood needs this buffer and green space. Why not incorporate it into Myers/Cascades Parks to add more play/park area? We don't need a sound wall. We want to keep our trees and wild life and our beautiful Parks & Rec Center and Community Room!!! Thank you!!!

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Wednesday, December 14, 2016 10:55:26 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Johan Last Name: van Tol Street Address: 1503 Old Fort Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I do not think a 30ft soundwall is a great solution. I also do not think that this whole parcel need to be developed, as shown in the sketch that has been circulated. It is clear that the current use is not in line with FLUM, nor is the RP-2 zoning. To me the best solution seems to be to split the parcel in two zoning parts, with the substation and the part closest to the railroad, and which currently is ugly and serves as parking, changed to CU, and keep the part with the offices along van Buren as is.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:35:50 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Mary Last Name: Frederick, on behalf of Woodland Drives NA Street Address: 805 Circle Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: The Woodland Drives Neighborhood Association (WDNA) supports and encourages responsible development of public and private property consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and attendant zoning. The WDNA also recognizes the potential perils of urban sprawl and desirability of responsible inner city infill. Any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designed to encourage urban infill should conform to the character, zoning designation and density of existing neighborhoods. The WDNA, as a matter of public policy, opposes changes to the Comprehensive Plan. The Association asserts the following: • The Comprehensive Plan and attendant zoning constitute a sacred covenant between government and its citizens whereby citizens purchase property, pay taxes, and make improvements to their land with the expectation that the government will protect their investment by maintaining the current zoning. To do otherwise creates uncertainty in the market place, destabilizes neighborhoods, and undermines the relationship between the government and the governed. • The 2030 Comprehensive Plan and zoning should be used to guide development on a long-term, macro-level basis and should not be modified by parcel or incrementally to the advantage of development interests at the expense of long-established adjacent neighborhoods. • Changes to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and zoning have recently occurred in existing neighborhoods on a small parcel basis without regard to infrastructure, resulting in significant problems, particularly traffic congestion and parking. Recent examples include Comprehensive Plan changes to parcels in the Midtown and College-Town neighborhoods. As a matter of public policy, the WDNA opposes the sale and development of public open-space and recreational land. The Association particularly opposes the sale and development of the 9.4 acre Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Affairs office parcel located on Myers Park Drive for the following reasons. • The City Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Affairs office complex is an important part of the city’s legacy and serves vital public and neighborhood purposes. • The City Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Affairs office complex is located in Tallahassee’s only historic district and should be afforded every protection that comes with that designation. • This parcel is designated as Open Space in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, is part of the Myers Park City Park and should be retained by the city for the benefit of current and future generations. Any development of this existing property should serve the greater public good and be designed to enhance Cascades Park, the jewel of the city’s park system. • The office complex is heavily used; therefore under existing city policy, it

cannot be considered surplus or sold (see City Commission Policy 136 - Real Property - 136.13). • The Association understands a change to the abovementioned city policy is being considered so the parcel can be sold and developed. The Association believes the sale of public pubic land is a violation of the public trust and should not be approved. • The Association notes that foliage, trees, and parks are noteworthy characteristics of Tallahassee. They are often cited as a primary attributes which bring people into our community. Destroying a part of our park system seems inconsistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood preservation and our values as a community. Conclusion: The Woodland Drives neighborhood is both wellestablished and located within Tallahassee’s only historic district. It receives an RP2 zoning designation under the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. It is immediately adjacent to Myers Park, Cascades Park and the Capital City Country Club. It holds a unique position in the history of Tallahassee. Its residents strongly believe in the sacred covenant that exists between government and the governed. However, events related to the location and subsequent noise emanating from the Cascades Park amphitheater and the city’s response to date coupled with recent discussion about the possible development of the 9.7 acres associated with the city’s Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Affairs office complex give our neighborhood great pause. Rather than be full partners with the city and county as to development interests that may impact our neighborhood, we find ourselves reacting to proposals after the fact. This arrangement only serves to undermine the productive relationship we have enjoyed to date and strains the bonds of trust that should exist between citizens and their elected officials. We encourage all city and county commissioners to protect the Myers Park and Woodland Drives neighborhoods by only permitting passive and recreational development of the parcel in question thereby serving the greater good of the community.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, December 18, 2016 6:55:07 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Melanie Last Name: Klein Street Address: 1144 Seminole Drive City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: We urge the Commission not to go forward with the sale and rezoning of the Parks and Recreation property. Such a redevelopment is unsuitable for our neighborhood, and we wish to retain the charm and character of the existing structures. The noise from Cascades Park should be abated with the previously-discussed wall.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, December 18, 2016 7:02:56 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Susan B Campbell Last Name: Campbell Street Address: 1101 Cherokee Drive City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: The idea of building apartments on the public land now occupied by the PRNA building and other structures is ill-considered. It is ill-considered because of the following: the loss of public land; the idea of using (new) residents to serve as a sound barrier when sound has clearly been a problem for residents from an even greater distance; the destruction of mature trees; the increase in traffic for the neighborhoods; the incompatibility with existing recreational and residential uses; the limited amount of in-town green space we now have and the potential for this terrible idea to become precedent setting; the loss of a historically significant building and setting. Indeed, there are some uses in this area that are already inappropriate, but it would be wiser and better to address those uses rather than load up the site with apartments and the many attendant problems. ##The City was poorly served by the particularly hideous and ridiculous images of sound barriers chosen by Blueprint 2000 for their presentation. It would be possible to have an attractive sound barrier that would both reduce sound into the neighborhoods, and serve as an amenity to Cascades Park. If the City would admit the mistakes made by the placement of the amphitheater and the purchase of inappropriate speakers and show the same dedication, as was evident in approving the expense and construction of the pedestrian bridge, we would not be talking about modifying the comprehensive plan, spot zoning to make public land private and fill it with apartments. Please don't do this! Thank you.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, December 18, 2016 7:43:16 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Elizabeth Last Name: Hollister Street Address: 1800 Old Fort Drive City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: The proposal to develop the Myers Park Parks and Rec site, supposedly as an alternative sound barrier, raises a number of questions and concerns: (1) what sort of resident would want to live so close to a railroad track and in full force of an amphitheater?; (2) the area in most critical need of sound barrier is riddled with development challenges – flood plain, drainage area, steep slopes; (3) how can 12 DU/acre possibly meet the Purpose and Intent of RP-2 zoning, which already allows considerable density intensity and attached or cluster-style housing; (4) if developed, why not just build within current parameters, but, if developed – see item (2), above – how is the sound problem getting resolved?; (5) solving the sound problem should remain first and foremost in all plans and efforts.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, December 18, 2016 7:54:31 PM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Katya Last Name: Taylor Street Address: 1053 Myer's Park Drive City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Please preserve the character of historic Myer's Park area, by NOT building a large complex that will cause much traffic, noise, and remove the beauty of the trees that surround us. I deeply appreciate your sensitivity to this situation. Myers Park is a city treasure, as is Cascades Park and the parklands (and recreation building/where we vote) should be honored and preserved. Thank you. Katya and Tom Taylor

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, December 18, 2016 10:51:10 PM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Lee Last Name: McNeil Street Address: 911 Carlton Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Selling this parcel to developers is about making money at the expense of the surrounding neighborhoods. It's already too bad that the plan for Cascades Park was changed without consideration for how it would affect us. And now the City has found a way to get out of building the promised sound wall AND get paid. Shame on you! How about listening to the tax payers who pay your salaries to represent us and keep your word.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Tuesday, December 20, 2016 11:42:30 AM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: melanie Last Name: longhurst Street Address: 1220 cherokee drive City: tallahassee State: fl Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am writing to request that the Tallahassee Parks & Rec location be kept as it is, and that no new development is built there. The soundpreventing wall should be built as originally designed, but the proposed housing development is unsuitable for this historic neighborhood. Thank you.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Thursday, December 22, 2016 1:54:42 AM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Sara Last Name: Rice Street Address: 1120 Clark Ave City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am a home owner in Woodland Drives. I do not support the Myers Park/Woodland Drive rezoning, sale, and development as it is currently proposed. The density of the residental properties proposed and the parking areas required are not consistent with the character of the neighborhood. Our property values and street traffic will be significantly negatively effected by the loss of open space with mature trees. I would like to see a proposal that preserves a substantial band of open space with mature trees in the acerage directly bordering the existing neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Thursday, December 29, 2016 11:44:57 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Brigitte Last Name: McKenzie Street Address: 1420 Golf Terrace Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Please keep me informed! Thanks, Brigitte & Guy McKenzie

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Saturday, December 31, 2016 1:41:19 PM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Lori Last Name: Breningmeyer Street Address: 1211 Seminole Drive City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I strongly oppose the proposed high density development for the Myers Park lot where the current Parks and Recreational buildings are. I am not anti-development and have no problem with some development on that property at the same density as the rest of the neighborhood. I believe 15-20 homes is roughly the housing density of 9 acres elsewhere in the neighborhood and this should be the standard (or something close to it) for any new development. Over 100 residential units would put a minimum of 200+ cars on our neighborhood roads daily creating a significant amount of air pollution, runoff, and danger to those who enjoy walking in our community. I've lived in this neighborhood almost 20 years, I strongly supported the development of Cascades Park and the Gaines Street improvements. However, a high density residential development is not appropriate for this area and will have negative impacts on the quality of life for those of us already living here. Thank you.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Saturday, December 31, 2016 3:48:27 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Nora Last Name: Underwood Street Address: 1123 Maple Dr. City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am writing to comment on the proposed rezoning of the Parks and Rec parcel. I commented on this issue before an earlier meeting in fall 2016, but want to reiterate my concerns now before the meeting to decide on rezoning. I am strongly opposed to rezoning this parcel as urban core for many reasons. I will list just a couple here. First, this neighborhood is an important link in the bicycling/pedestrian/running network (streets bordering the parcel feed into the new and excellent biking and walking facilities, many bikers commute through this area, families on bikes use these streets regularly, walkers use this area, and this neighborhood hosts many annual running events). Adding a large number of cars to traffic on these streets will degrade the experience of walking and running, and make biking less safe. The streets bordering the parcel are not designed to carry an urban-core level of traffic. The increased traffic will have a major negative impact on folks living in this area, reduce the attractiveness of the neighborhood as a place for young, alternative transportation, urban oriented families (who are now choosing this part of town for its connectedness and relatively safe streets), and reduce the city-wide value of the neighborhood as an extension of the walking/running facilities in Cascades and Myers parks. Second, one of the things that makes Tallahassee an attractive place to live is its excellent parks and extensive urban forest. The city has made great use of park space in Cascades as a draw for people from all over the city. The parks and rec parcel currently adds to the value of Cascades visually and in terms of water control (it isn't impervious surface) and urban forest (through its trees). Developing the entire parcel would greatly reduce this value, and prevent the city from extending Cascades park by providing additional recreational resources (e.g. basketball, or climbing wall, etc.). Finally, the Parks and Rec buildings on the parcel and trees in that area are beautiful. I bring visitors to town (e.g. individuals I am recruiting for jobs in Tallahassee) into the neighborhood past those buildings deliberately because the area never fails to elicit visitor comments on how beautiful it is, and generally how nice the adjoining neighborhoods are. Tearing down those buildings and replacing them with apartments and parking lots would be an enormous waste of one of Tallahassee's strong points. As Tallahassee works to attract well-educated, creative and influential people to our community we need to emphasize things that these people want (parks, infrastructure for alternative transportation, safe neighborhoods that are connected to urban amenities). There is not currently a housing shortage in the neighborhoods near this parcel, and certainly of plenty places to build more apartments in the area (e.g. on S. Monroe, or in smaller developments on open parcels within the

neighborhood) without sacrificing the entirely of a publicly owned parcel that contributes to parkland, neighborhood safety and connectedness. I am in favor of in-fill, but putting high density development on this particular parcel is contrary to the best interests of Tallahassee.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Monday, January 02, 2017 10:18:19 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Isabelle Potts Last Name: Potts Street Address: 1407 S. Meridian St. City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Re: Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Affairs (PRNA) Administrative Offices (PCM201706). I strenuously object to the change of zoning to allow "a variety of residential building types, employment, office, and commercial activity" in a neighborhood that is strictly residential. This encroachment will ultimately destroy this, the most diverse neighborhood in Tallahassee. (It is interesting to me that this zoning is on the same agenda as a proposed change to Amelia Circle which, a couple of decades ago, tipped from a residential neighborhood to a multi-unit student area which quickly devolved into constant partying with accompanying loud noises at night and trash on the street.) Neighborhoods are sensitive eco-systems. The proposed change, if adopted, will turn a residential neighborhood into a commercial one, with attendant noise and traffic. I don't understand the urge to create commercial zones in our neighborhood when South Monroe and South Adams just South of the Railroad Bridge (and the area between them) can still take on much commercial growth without impacting residential areas. I take no comfort in the statement that further development will need to be approved by a City office considering how many developments are started under the cover of darkness and only brought to light when the deal is pretty much done.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Monday, January 02, 2017 11:39:56 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Bill and Pat Last Name: Prescott Street Address: 1177 Old Fort Drive City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Don’t rezone the 9.5-acre Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Affairs office complex parcel, adjacent to Cascades Park, to allow its development with high-density housing. We live in the nearby historic Woodland Drives Neighborhood, founded in the 1930s. It’s a beautiful area of mature trees, rolling hills, and older single-family homes. The proposed development on the Parks and Rec parcel would be out of character of the Woodland Drives and Myers Park neighborhoods. It also would, of course, result in the demolition of the Parks and Rec building, and destroy many mature trees that now provide a sound barrier for the Cascades Park amphitheater. The rezoning would allow up to 116 new dwelllings on the parcel. They would contribute to increased traffic, congestion and noise. We live next to Circle Drive, a main route through the area that would carry much of that traffic. That would decrease our enjoyment of our home and neighborhood. Thank you.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Wednesday, January 04, 2017 11:26:52 PM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Jayme Last Name: Harpring Street Address: 2026 W Indianhead Dr City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Please do not rezone or sell to developers the public land in Myers Park that is currently being considered by development. As a longtime resident of Indianhead Acres, I strongly believe it would comprise the historic character of one of the oldest neighborhoods in Tallahassee. And I believe if those voting on it lived in the area, they would not want to see tis change either.

From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments:

Perrine, Beth Calhoun, Sherri FW: Citizen Comments Submission from Talgov.com forTallahassee-Leon County Planning Commission Monday, January 09, 2017 12:12:23 PM image001.png

    Beth Perrine Staff Assistant Tallahassee-Leon County Planning Dept. Land Use Planning 850.891.6400 • [email protected]

Please note that under Florida’s Public Records laws, most written communications to or from city and county staff or officials regarding public business are public records available to the public and media upon request.  Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure.

  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 11:43 AM To: Perrine, Beth Cc: [email protected]; Haley, Jiwuan Subject: Citizen Comments Submission from Talgov.com forTallahassee-Leon County Planning Commission

Citizen Comments Submission from Talgov.com for Tallahassee-Leon County Planning Commission Project Name/Number: pcm 201406 - Myers Park Name: grant gelhardt Street Address: 1906 chuli nene City: tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Planning Commission The Indianhead Lehigh Neighborhood Association is opposed to the City’s proposal to change the future land use designation and zoning of the city park land in Myers Park to Central Urban and Central Urban-12. The proposed change in land use will be compounding previous poor planning decisions which have negatively impacted the adjacent urban residential neighborhood. The first mistake was locating the amphitheater in a manner that directed the sound to the adjacent neighborhood. The amphitheater was increased in size to accommodate larger events resulted in major sound disturbance in the adjacent neighborhood. The sound issues resulted in an agreement to build a sound wall to mitigate the negative impacts to the neighborhood. The city then changed course and now wants to place townhouses and apartments on the city park land which would

directly impact the neighborhood with vastly increased density, increase traffic in the area, destroy green-space, take public park lands out of public use, increase stormwater runoff, and compromise park maintenance at the adjacent Cascade Park by moving park maintenance staff. Which seems likes punishing the neighborhood for complaining about the sound. Once land use is changed it is a commitment on behalf of the city that the land will be develop at the intensity of 12 units an acre, for a total of 116 dwelling units. I do not believe there is any possible development plan at this site which could allow the development of the site with over 100 dwelling units which could possibly be compatible with the adjacent neighborhood development pattern. There is no data or analysis that shows that apartment and townhouse development at this site would be compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. There is no data or analysis that shows that apartment and townhouse development at this site would mitigate the sound bleeding-over from the amphitheater. Since the city has also stated that it is their intent is to sell the parcel for development purposes, once the future land use map is changed – it is a fait accompli that development of the site as Central Urban will take place on this site at 12 units an acre, for a total of 116 unites. The concept of selling public park lands for development is an antithesis to good city planning, especially in an urban area where there is a finial limited open space available. On the edge of this development is the city utility building and sub-station. The Future Land Use of the utility building and the substation should be changed to Governmental Operation, not to Central Urban. Back to the Myers Park parcel, again the proposal has not been well thought out. There is a city water well and communication tower on this parcel which the city needs to retain. Therefore this area could not be developed or sold. On this parcel, the area that can be developed for residential housing or retail is the existing maintenance yard and storage building area and the existing park offices. This the high flat ground off of Myers Park Drive and Van Buren Street. The area where the sound is funneling from the amphitheater to the neighborhood is in a flood zone in the valley between the parks offices and the electoral substation. This area is not buildable; and if it was built on it would be extremely problematic and would be built in an area most suited for a stormwater pond. So the whole premise of the development – to develop townhouses and apartments in lieu of a sound wall is not viable since developing a wall of townhouses and apartments and providing parking and stormwater retention in flood zone could not be designed or permitted for this portion of the property. The designation of the public park land property should not be changed to Central Urban and rezoned to CU-12. The Indianhead Lehigh Neighborhood Association is willing to sit down and discuss these issues at your convenience. Sincerely Grant Gelhardt, President Indianhead Lehigh Neighborhood Association

White, Artie From: Sent: To: Subject:

J. Bayfield Friday, December 16, 2016 1:49 PM White, Artie Proposed Zoning Amendment PCM201706

Hello We are homeowners in the Myers Park neighborhood and are very concerned about the proposed zoning change from OS to CU. If the goal is reducing noise--noise from an amphitheater that faces a residential neighborhood--then how is it appropriate to further encroach on the very same neighborhood by removing green space, demolishing the Park and Rec building, and erecting high density housing? Solutions for noise control exist aplenty along our nation's highways--attractive walls with staggered heights, enhanced by landscaping, evergreen shrubs and trees, ivies and vines, a berm or two. We know this approach works. Our greatest concern are the unintended effects. We believe the proposed zoning change would: - gut the heart of the Park by demolishing the Park and Rec building which sits adjacent to the main recreation areas and is a focal point. It has history and it has rustic charm. - bring more traffic to Myers Park Drive, and make parking and leaving less safe for children and families using recreation areas. - devalue the Historic District designation and possibly depress home values--all with no assurance the new housing will solve the noise issue! Tallahassee has a proud tradition of excellent parks. Let's come up with a better solution! Janet Bayfield 1514 Golf Terrace Drive 222-2495 [email protected]

1

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, January 15, 2017 3:51:50 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Gail Last Name: Palo Street Address: 911 Carlton Dr. City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: I am very concerned with the proposed plans to develop the public land in Myers Park. I moved to the neighborhood for its quiet and natural quality. I believe the increased density of residents that would come with the proposed brownstones will significantly increase the noise, traffic and decrease the quite, natural allure of the neighborhood. I understand the need for development in general and the economic pull for the city to sell land to make money rather than spend money to make public land further enhance the quality of our neighborhood, but I beg you to equally consider the residents of our neighborhood who have owned property here for many, many years and are strongly opposed to this type of development in our backyard.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Sunday, January 15, 2017 10:48:29 AM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Ellen Berkowitz Last Name: Berkowitz Street Address: 320 Cortez St City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32303 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: As a long time Tallahassee resident, born, raised and returned here, I am very distressed at the proposal to sell Myers Park and turn it into residential area. The tennis courts and pool have benefited neighborhood and other city residents for many decades and leafy green space has added beauty to the area. Though it is close to Cascade Park it has a look and feel that is quite different as well as activities not available at any other park near by. This area should be left as is and not turned into additional residential or commercial use. Ellen Berkowitz

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:28:11 PM

Amendment: PCM201706 Map First Name: Amy Last Name: Diaz de Villegas Street Address: 1201 S. Gadsden St. City: Tallahassee State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Regarding the development of the Parks and Recreation land, I feel that it would make the most sense to develop the land on the North side of the property, closest to Cascades Park, and leave the Parks and Rec Building and the green spaces along Van Buren St. untouched. I also hope that the extra traffic that development will bring to the neighborhood will be addressed. I live on the corner of Gadsden and Van Buren Streets, and ever since traffic was blocked from going straight up Oakland Ave, all traffic coming into Myers Park, off of Monroe St, must go past my house. At certain times of day, it is difficult to get out of the driveway. I have two young children, ages two and five, and we enjoy visiting Cascades Park, but in the late afternoons, prime park time, it can be very difficult for us to cross Gadsden St. There is often a steady stream of cars at that time, and no cross walk. Thank you, Amy

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Thursday, November 17, 2016 9:28:51 PM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: JOHN Last Name: SCHOLZ Street Address: 1622 SEMINOLE DR City: TALLAHASSEE State: FL Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: THIS PROPOSAL IS MOST DISTURBING AND COMPLETELY AGAINST THE SPIRIT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. THE PARKS AND RECREATION OFFICES ARE THE ICON OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT MUST BE PRESERVED. THIS LAND SHOULD LINK CASCADES AND MYERS PARKS, AS INTENDED BY CURRENT ZONING. MOST CITIES WOULD BE ENVIOUS OF OWNING PUBLIC PROPERTY THAT CAN LINK SUCH GREAT PROPERTIES SO CLOSE TO THE CENTER OF THE CITY. WHEN I MOVED TO TALLAHASSEE IN 2001 I WAS ATTRACTED BY HTE TREES AND UNIQUE OPEN SPACES. DRIVING BACK FROM THE UNIVERSITY TO MY HOUSE ON SEMINOLE DRIVE, THE MYERS PARK RECREATION OFFICE WAS ALWAYS A VERY WELCOME GREETING TO OUR WONDERFUL TREED NEIGHBORHOOD. YET IN RECENT YEARS THE BEAUTIFUL PINES ON MAGNOLIA BETWEEN APALACHEE PARKWAN AND PARK HAVE BEEN LOST TO TICKY-TACKY MINIMALLS UNDISTINGUISHABLE FROM ANYWHERE ELSE IN AMERICA, AND THE FUNKY LOW-DENSITY DEVELOPMENT SOUTH OF FSU HAS BEEN TURNED INTO LOW-COST STUDERNT HOUSING THAT WILL BE DILAPIDATED WITHIN THE DECADE. AND THE LOSS OF THE LIVE OAKS IN THE BUCK LAKE AREA IS DEEPLY SADDENING. THOSE PLACES WERE ALREADY PRIVATE LANDS, AND HARD TO PRESERVE ON TALLAHASSEE'S BUDGET. BUT PLEASE DON'T DESTROY MORE TREES AND OPEN SPACES ON LAND THE CITY IS FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO OWN. THE AREA SUGGESTED FOR REZONING HAS CHARM AND OPEN SPACES THAT ARE THE ESSENSE OF THE BEST OF TALLAHASSEE!!!!! TURNING THE AREA INTO A DENSE HOUSING CENTER WOULD DEGRADE BOTH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND CASCADES PARK. THE MATURE TREES ON THAT PROPERTY ADDS THE FOREST EFFECT THAT IS MISSING FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF CASCADE PARK. THINK OF HOW DIFFERENT THE VIEW FROM PARK WOULD BE IF IT LOOKED ON HIGH RISE APARTMENTS ACROSS THE TRACKS INSTEAD OF THE BEAUTIFUL TREES THAT ARE THERE NOW!!! WHY DEVALUE A PARK AFTER SUCH A GREAT INVESTMENT, AND A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT VOTES AND MEETS IN THE BEAUTIFUL PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDINGS. IT IS NOT JUST A MATTER OF FINDING ANOTHER PLACE TO VOTE, AS STATED IN THE PROPOSAL-- IT IS A MATTER OF DESTROYING THE GREAT SYMBOL OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE CHERISH IN THOSE BUILDINGS. I AM CERTAIN THAT OUR TOWN PLANNERS CAN COME UP WITH MUCH BETTER PLANS FOR THAT PROPERTY THAT CAN ADD TO THE COMMON GOOD OF THE CITY RATHER THAN JUST EXTEND THE USUAL DEVELOPMENTS THAT WOULD ADD TRAFFIC IN AN AREA NOT EQUIPPED TO HANDLE IT AND WOULD TAKE THE SPIRIT OUT OF

ANOTHER DISAPPEARING PART OF TALLAHASSEE. PLEASE COME UP WITH A BETTER PLAN THAT CONFORMS WITH THE CURRENT HISTORIC AND OPEN SPACE EXPECTATIONS AND THAT PRESERVES THE WONDERFUL COMMUNITY CENTER AT THE PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDINGS!!!!

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

[email protected] CMP_PLN_AMND Calhoun, Sherri 2017 Comp Plan Public Comment Submission Thursday, November 17, 2016 4:24:18 PM

Amendment: PCM201701 Map First Name: Bryon and Barbara Last Name: Ehlmann Street Address: 1066 Merritt Dr City: Tallahassee State: Florida Zip: 32301 Email Address: [email protected] Comments: Regarding Amendment: #PCM201706 My wife and I strongly oppose this amendment for the following reasons: 1. The amendment was proposed based on a deceptive presentation by Wayne Tedder to City Commissioners resulting in false assumptions—1) that a 30 ft. sound wall would be ugly and obtrusive when viewed from Cascades Park when in fact this sound wall would be mostly hidden from view by trees aligning both sides of the railroad track and could be made attractive and almost invisible with appropriate façade and landscaping and 2) that development of the property proposed for rezoning would provide abatement from occasional amphitheater noise when in fact such abatement is questionable and such development would cause more noise in general, not just occasionally but day in and day out, by increasing traffic on neighborhood streets. If surrounding residents could choose between A) no sound wall and no development and B) development, I am sure they would almost certainly choose A! 2. This property is currently being productively used by the city and is thus not “surplus land” that can be sold. No plans have been put forward concerning any new locations for the P&R offices, the Myers Park neighborhood meeting and polling place, and the park maintenance facilities. Until such plans are made, this property should not be rezoned and sold. Instead, it should be preserved for present and future city use. It certainly appears that private development interests are behind this amendment and the wheels that have been turning so far to push this amendment forward have not be turning in the sunshine. 3. The high density zoning is inconsistent with the Myers Park Historical District designation. 4. Given that Gaines St. was closed off by Cascades Park, the only ingress/regress to and from this property is via neighborhood streets—Myers Park Dr., Circle Dr., Santa Rosa Dr., and E. Van Buren St. Also, significantly more traffic will result on E. Lafayette St. Thus, with high density development, too much traffic will result on these streets. 5. Any townhouses built along the railroad tracks will experience extreme train noise. Who would want to live there? 6. Absolutely no justification has been given to rezone and bulldoze over the P&R office complex along with its the many large, mature trees. An infill strategy to hinder urban sprawl should not give license to develop publicly owned green space within the city. To do so will defeat the objective of such strategy as more and more city residents will move to the suburbs. “Infill” should mean redevelop and building up not out, it should not mean the plundering of parks and public green spaces. If an extreme amendment such as this can be so readily made to the comp plan--a change that ignores historical district designation and allows publicly and productively used, citizen-

owned land to be sold for private profit—then the comp plan is not worth the paper it is written on.