2006 All Field Offices To: Attn: ADIC SAC CDC AD Billy DADs Section Chiefs Counterterrorism

FOI PA # 1082883 (Rev. 01-31-2003) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date: 1 2 / 1 5 / 2 0 0 6 Precedence: R O U T I N E To: All Field Offices Attn...
Author: Janel Bishop
0 downloads 2 Views 722KB Size
FOI PA # 1082883 (Rev. 01-31-2003)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION Date: 1 2 / 1 5 / 2 0 0 6

Precedence: R O U T I N E To:

All Field Offices

Attn: A D I C SAC CDC FCI/IT Supervisors

Counterterrorism

From:

AD Billy DADs Section Chiefs

Counterintelligence

AD Bereznay DADs Section Chiefs

Cyber

AD Finch DADs Section Chiefs

O f f i c e of the G e n e r a l C o u n s e l N a t i o n a l fiecuritv Law B r a n c h Contact: b6

Approved By: Caproni Valerie E Thomas Julie F

b7C fc>2

Drafted By: Case ID #:

(U)

319X-HQ-A1487720-OGC

Title: (U) L E G A L A D V I C E A N D O P I N I O N S ; U P L O A D I N G OF N S L R E T U R N I N F O R M A T I O N Synopsis: (U) P r o v i d e s g u i d a n c e to the field as to the n e e d to review N S L r e t u r n i n f o r m a t i o n p r i o r to u p l o a d i n g the i n f o r m a t i o n into FBI databases. Details: (U) It h a s come to the a t t e n t i o n of the O f f i c e of G e n e r a l C o u n s e l , N a t i o n a l S e c u r i t y Law B r a n c h (NSLB), that t h e r e m a v b e o c c a s i o n s in w h i c h N S L i n f o r m a t i o n has b e e n u p l o a d e d into| [ ] o t h e r d a t a b a s e s p r i o r to h a v i n g b e e n r e v i e w e d by any b'Bi personnel". T h i s is p a r t i c u l a r l y l i k e l y to o c c u r if the i n f o r m a t i o n is r e c e i v e d in e l e c t r o n i c f o r m . H o w e v e r , a p r o b l e m arises if the i n f o r m a t i o n that w a s r e c e i v e d is not r e s p o n s i v e to the N S L and t h u s , not r e l e v a n t to an a u t h o r i z e d n a t i o n a l s e c u r i t y i n v e s t i g a t i o n ,

NSL VIO-27350

b2

To: A l l D i v i s i o n s From: O f f i c e of the G e n e r a l C o u n s e l Re: 3 1 9 X - H Q - A 1 4 8 7 7 2 0 -OGC 12/15/2006 o r , a l t e r n a t i v e l y , if there w a s a m i s t a k e b y the FBI in the N S L such that the r e c o r d s are r e s p o n s i v e but not r e l e v a n t to an a u t h o r i z e d i n v e s t i g a t i o n . Such d e f i c i e n c i e s in the N S L r e t u r n i n f o r m a t i o n m a y n e v e r be d i s c o v e r e d , o r , d i s c o v e r e d too late to p r e v e n t the use of i n f o r m a t i o n that the FBI did not p r o p e r l y c o l l e c t . T h e r e f o r e , it is i m p e r a t i v e that the records b e r e v i e w e d b e f o r e u p l o a d i n g to assure that t h e y are relevant to an a u t h o r i z e d n a t i o n a l s e c u r i t y i n v e s t i g a t i o n . T h e r e a f t e r , if the r e c o r d s were p r o p e r l y o b t a i n e d , they m a y be u p l o a d e d into a d a t a b a s e . If there is a p r o b l e m w i t h 1 the m a n n e r in w h i c h they were o b t a i n e d , o t h e r steps n e e d to be taken. A n y q u e s t i o n s about this m a t t e r m a y be d i r e c t e d to A G C

1- M s . C a p r o n i 1- M s . T h o m a s 1-1

NSL VIO-27351

1

If the records were not properly obtained, i.e., there was a mistake by the carrier or the FBI in the NSL process, then the records should be sequestered with the CDC, and a potential IOB reported to N S L B . Thereafter, in its responsive EC, NSLB will indicate the proper disposition of the records. If the records were in fact properly obtained (e.g., the records are covered by the attachment, if not the body of the NSL)), they may be retained and uploaded. If the records were not properly obtained but are relevant to an authorized investigation (e.g.. exceed the time frame of the NSL but pertain to the subject of the NSL), the records should remain sequestered until another NSL is issued to cover those records. If the records were not properly obtained and are not relevant to an authorized investigation, the CDC is expected to contact the owner of the records and determine if the entity wants the records returned to it or destroyed by the FBI. For a full explanation of the manner in which NSL records should be maintained for IOB purposes, see EC, dated 11/16/2006, 278-HQ-C1229736, serial 2570.

X THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI) From: Sent: To: Subject:

(S)

(FBI) Friday. December 15. 2006 5:57 PM (OGC) (FBI) Document Request by OIG

b2 b7E

b6 b7C

telephone Attached are the two documents we discussed. The POC for Incnflrtinn riiwicinn ic ] As we discussed, these documents don't appear in the file and I have not been provided •i with any originals/signed copies, if there are any. These were e-mailed TO ms by the agsht who drafted them, from his workstation. Please don't hesitate to call me on my cell

if you need anything regarding this.

b2 b6 b7C b l

Thanks again, b2

b7E

CDC

b6

b7C

(S)

O

SL.wpd (26 KB)

NSL VIQ-27389 b l

(S)[

"IJSLHQ.wpd Ì12 IKB)

l

U.S. Department of Justice

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Washington, D. C. 20535-0001

D e c e m b e r 1 4 , 2006

BY C O U R I E R M r . Stephen Friedman Chairman Intelligence Oversight Board R o o m 50209 New Executive Office Building 725 17th S t r e e t , N o r t h w e s t Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. Friedman:

NSL VIO-27390

T h i s l e t t e r f o r w a r d s f o r y o u r i n f o r m a t i o n a selfe x p l a n a t o r y ermi n s m - p e n t i t l e d " I n t e l l i g e n c e O v e r s i g h t B o a r d (IOB) M a t t e r , D i v i s i o n , IOB M a t t e r 2006-11 I" (U) 1 •

T h e e n c l o s u r e sets forth d e t a i l s of i n v e s t i g a t i v e a c t i v i t y w h i c h the FBI h a s d e t e r m i n e d w a s c o n d u c t e d c o n t r a r y to the A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l G u i d e l i n e s for FBI N a t i o n a l S e c u r i t y Investigations and Foreign Intelligence Collection and/or laws, E x e c u t i v e O r d e r s , o r P r e s i d e n t i a l D i r e c t i v e s w h i c h g o v e r n FBI foreign counterintelligence and international terrorism investigations. (U) Enclosure U N C L A S S I F I E D WHEN DETACHED FROM C L A S S I F I E D ENCLOSURE

b 2

b7E

S h o u l d y o u o r a n y m e m b e r of y o u r staff r e q u i r e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g this m a t t e r , an oral b r i e f i n g w i l l be a r r a n g e d for y o u at y o u r c o n v e n i e n c e . (U) Sincerely,

Julie F . T h o m a s Deputy General Counsel

1 - The H o n o r a b l e A l b e r t o G o n z a l e s Attorney General U . S . D e p a r t m e n t of J u s t i c e R o o m 5111 NSL VIO-27391 1 - Mr. James Baker C o u n s e l , O f f i c e of I n t e l l i g e n c e P o l i c y a n d R e v i e w U . S . D e p a r t m e n t of J u s t i c e R o o m 6150

7

Message

Page 1 of 4

THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI)

b l b2

b7E

(S)

b6 b7C b2

TJ1îCfcASSlElED_ NON-RECORD

b6 b7C

Some futher information sent to me regarding this matter. Still don't have the letter, though.

b l ZDZ£

(S)

b2

Original Message ~1FBI; Fromf Sent: Tuesday, December 19. 2006 3: 01 PM T o ( I ^ F R T V f leeded r Subject: FW: Facts oi

b7E b6

NSL VIO-27392

b7C

1LFBI) JSL letter ASAP

NON-RECORD b l

(S)

Below is one of the emails which rnntains my response to FBIHQ, Assistant Section Chief f rnnrominntjthe chain of events wit[_ p this matter. I also sent a fairly detailed response which was for the Director, concerning the chain of events and why the FBI needs admin subpoena authority in terrorism matters. If and when I locate that email I will also forward it to you both. Thanks^ Original MessaqeFroml

(S)

b6

b7C

]CTD) (FBI)

To: Subject: RE: Facts oi

ICFBIi Jeeded re

ISL letter ASAP

b l

b2 b7E

"DNLLAlibll'irn NON-RECORD

b6

b7C

Thanks for the rapid response.

b2 Original MessageFBI) From: Sent: I hurédày, July P., ¿UUb b:17 PN ~JCTD)(FBI); l o C ') (FBI) Ce (CTD) (FBI);

6/2/2007

b7E h6 }CTD) (FBI); (CTD)(FBI);

CTD) (FBI);

b7C

Message

Page 2 o f 4

(FBI);[ Su bject: RE : Facts oi

(S)

1 (CIP) (FBI) needed re

b6

b7C

sISL letter ASAP

b l UNCLASSIFIËD" NON-RECORD

• (3)

ecords along We originally were in the process of obtaining a subpoenal. T with a sealed court order to be issued N This process was stopped at the direction of FBI HQ, CTD. and I was told that we needed to serve an NSL. We prepared the NSL and it was e-mailed to SAC I iDivision, signed apd_tfitumfi(J. Our SAC, and their legai counsel aovised that currently TDY at FBIHQ. The NSL was then served on hp wm iiH nnt arront/hnnnr the NSL because the NSL was only foi We had our CDC and FBIHQ involved in this throughout the process. FBIHQ, ITOS I, then advised thai pivision would be forwarding us a GJ subpoena to S£ serve .We obtained the GJ subpoena frorr| |late Friday afternoon and served it on the attorney fo|_ He initially declined to honor the subpoena because he stated that we should have presented him with court order under the Patriot Act and also that he wanted each individual who had records a( to be named in the subpoena. He also made some additional remarks that I will not go into at this tirna Bottom line is we told him to consider himself served and provided him with the subpoena. A/SAC| ' alsQjGQQtacted the JconceNi&lgViOflaRS^ this point. About one hour later th€ ittorney called olir office and advised the documents were ready to be picked up.

Ï

(S)

(S) (S) (S)

b6

b7C b2

b7E b l

ï

This process delayed us approximately one day in obtaining the records. However, it occupied a great deal of my time and more importantly the time of two agents who could have been focusing on the Investigation at hand. I would agree with the obvious, that administrative subpoena power in the field involving CT matters may be the single most important tool that the agents could use to improve/expedite their investigations. If you require any additional info please let me know. b6

Thanks

b7C

(S)

— O r i g i n a l MessaoeFromJ ]CTD)(FBI) Sent: Thursday. July 21. 2005 3:55 PM To: [CTD) (FBI); tTD) (FELL Cc: I C T D ) (FBI)[ ](FBI) Subject: FW: Facts or îeeded re Importance: High

b6

b7C

(CTD) (FBI);

.b2 CTD)(FBI);

b7E b l

ISL letter ASAP

ONCfcASSIFlED NON-RECORD

]• Is the below true? Did we go NSL first and then GJS? Pis respond by e-mail. Anyone with full knowledge to get this back tc|

fry

e-mail? b6

Assistant Section Chief

6/2/2007

b7C

A

Message

Page 3 of 4

International Terrorism Ops Section 1 CTD/FBIHQ -

;stu) b2

(green) pgr) cell) Original Messaoe-

Fro m :l (CTD) (FBI) Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:10 PM To( [CTDVFBD: Cc:l rCTD) (FBI); DO; TFBÏÏÏT Subject: Facts or needed re Importance: Hig

S)

b6 ICTD)(FBI) (CTD) (FBI)

b7C

bl

L1ÇTD) (FBI) JSL letter ASAP

UNCLASSIFIED NON-RECOR1

(S> :s)

b6

I just got a call from ofORSL circumstances surrounding the NSL tetter issued fc

It i
6/2/2007

b2 b6 b7C

b7C

ijffiggpjhac rpni loctprl a uuritp i ir on the

bl ]

b l

h6 blC

(Rev. 01-31-2003)

SEJrét

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

Precedence: To:

ROUTINE Attn:

Counterterrorism

Attn: Attn:

Title:

3S-100

b2 b7E b6

.Till -i e F NSL V I O - 2 7 4 0 4

Drafted By: Case

¿0 (Sept. 1 3 , 1993) a n d S e c t i o n 2 - 5 6 of t h e N a t i o n a l F o r e i g n I n t e l l i g e n c e P r o g r a m M a n u a l (NFIPM), O G C w a s t a s k e d t o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r t h e s u r v e i l l a n c e e r r o r s d e s c r i b e d h e r e a r e m a t t e r s that s h o u l d b e r e p o r t e d to t h e I O B . W e b e l i e v e t h a t t h e r e p o r t e d a c t i v i t y d o e s n o t r e q u i r e IOB n o t i f i c a t i o n , b u t O I P R p r o v i d e d a p r e l i m i n a r y n o t i c e of a n i n c i d e n t of n o n - c o m p l i a n c e r e l a t e d to this matter. OGC respectfully disagrees and has filed memoranda stating the FBI's p o s i t i o n on this m a t t e r . (U) S e c t i o n 2.4 of E . O . 12863 m a n d a t e s t h a t t h e h e a d s of I n t e l l i g e n c e C o m m u n i t y c o m p o n e n t s r e p o r t a l l i n f o r m a t i o n to t h e IOB t h a t it d e e m s n e c e s s a r y t o c a r r y o u t its SjfeCRET 3

SBe^Ei (U)

To: I n s p e c t i o n F r o m : O f f i c e of G e n e r a l C o u n s e l Re:l^) 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 12/28/2006

r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s . That s e c t i o n r e q u i r e s I n s p e c t o r s G e n e r a l and G e n e r a l C o u n s e l of the I n t e l l i g e n c e C o m m u n i t y to report "intelligence a c t i v i t i e s that t h e y have r e a s o n to b e l i e v e m a y be u n l a w f u l o r c o n t r a r y to E x e c u t i v e o r d e r or P r e s i d e n t i a l directive." T h i s l a n g u a g e has b e e n i n t e r p r e t e d to m a n d a t e the r e p o r t i n g of a n y v i o l a t i o n of g u i d e l i n e s or r e g u l a t i o n s a p p r o v e d b y the A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l , in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h E . O . 1 2 3 3 3 , if such p r o v i s i o n ' w a s d e s i g n e d in full or in p a r t to p r o t e c t t h e i n d i v i d u a l r i g h t s of a U n i t e d States p e r s o n . T h i s i n c l u d e s v i o l a t i o n s of a g e n c y p r o c e d u r e s issued u n d e 1r E . O . 1 2 3 3 3 , u n l e s s they involve p u r e l y a d m i n i s t r a t i v e m a t t e r s . F o r the F B I , the 2 Office of the G e n e r a l C o u n s e l (OGC) s u b m i t s r e p o r t s to the IOB. S)

(&) The A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l ' s G u i d e l i n e s for FBI F o r e i g n I n t e l l i g e n c e C o l l e c t i o n a n d Foreign Ponnf.pri ntel 1 icrRnce Invest igat ions (NSIG) p r o v i d e that L

T75TU

b l

b2 b7E

i d e n t i f i e s as Introduction) at 4 . — S e c t i o n 2-b6 o ? t ^ e r e p o r t a b l e to the IOB u n a u t h o r i z e d i n v e s t i g a t i o n s , the u s e of u n l a w f u l m e t h o d s a n d t e c h n i q u e s , e x c e e d i n g the a u t h o r i z e d scope of p e r m i t t e d 3a c t i v i t i e s , and failing to a d h e r e to m i n i m i z a t i o n requirements. 1

(U)-

S e e EC from Inspection Division to All Divisions; Title: Revised Procedures for the Submission of Reports of Potential Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) Matters, Case ID # 66F-HQ-A1247863 Serial 172 at 5-6 (2/10/2005). The Inspection Division is required to maintain for three years records of administrative violations, for possible review by the Counsel to the IOB, together with a copy of the opinion concerning the basis for the determination that IOB notification was not required. Id. at 6. (U)-

See id. at 4. 3

(X) See also id. at 5, identifying reportable matters as including: (1) activities believed to be unlawful or contrary to Executive Orders or Presidential directives; (2) suspected

IS)

v-inlafinng

nf

fhp

f n n s f i t-nt i nn :

m l

'5) initiating a , tarm fit 616(5ti 6niC surveillance a s s a r e n Without authorization from the FISC, or failing to terminate an authorized surveillance at the time prescribed by the Court; and (6) failing to adhere to S^ET

4

b l b2 I

b7E

S^ET To: Inspection F r o m : O f f i c e of G e n e r a l C o u n s e l ( U ) R e : C ^ T 27 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 1 2 / 2 8 / 2 0 0 6

(U) T i t l e 18 U . S . C . § 3 1 2 3 ( 3 ) ( b ) ( 1 ) ( C ) ( I s s u a n c e of a n o r d e r for a p e n r e g i s t e r or a trap a n d t r a c e d e v i c e ) s t a t e s t h a t a n o r d e r s h a l l s p e c i f y " a t t r i b u t e s of the c o m m u n i c a t i o n s to w h i c h the o r d e r a p p l i e s , i n c l u d i n g the n u m b e r o r o t h e r i d e n t i f i e r a n d , if known, t h e l o c a t i o n of t h e t e l e p h o n e l i n e o r o t h e r f a c i l i t y to w h i c h the p e n r e g i s t e r or t r a p a n d t r a c e d e v i c e is to b e a t t a c h e d or a p p l i e d . . . " (Emphasis a d d e d ) T h e r e is s u f f i c i e n t c a s e law to s h o w t h a t l i s t i n g the w r o n g a d d r e s s is n o t f a t a l to the o r d e r , p a r t i c u l a r l y w h e n the c o r r e c t t e l e p h o n e n u m b e r i s l i s t e d ; t h e t e l e p h o n e n u m b e r is c l e a r l y w h a t the p r o v i d e r r e l i e s u p o n to t r i g g e r / c o n f i g u r e the d e v i c e . F o r e x a m p l e , in U . S . v . D o o l i t t l e . the c o u r t h e l d t h a t c l e r i c a l e r r o r s r e s u l t i n g i n a n i n c o r r e c t d i g i t or a n i n v e r s i o n of d i g i t s in t h e t a r g e t ' s t e4l e p h o n e n u m b e r s did not invalidate a wiretap application or order. Similarly, a t y p o g r a p h i c a l e r r o r i n the d e f e n d a n t ' s a d d r e s s i n t h e a p p l i0c a t i o n authorization does not invalidate the application or order. l| Cj J

In

th°

-i-nct-ar-^ m a H - o i - " ! " ' "

' "loT-it- a i n or! PTQP

a u t h o r i t y to c o l l e c t | | E v e n 1-honglT f h p ^phnriP .g^-rtH tnr t h o covered under docket w a s m o v e d f r o m o n e a d d r e s s to a n o t h e r , the f a c i l i t i e s c o n t i n u e d to b e u s e d b y the t a r g e t d u r i n g the p e r i o d of a u t h o r i z e d c o v e r a g e . A c c o r d i n g to § 3 1 2 3 ( 3 ) ( b ) ( 1 ) ( C ) , t h e a d d r e s s w h e r e the f a c i l i t y is l o c a t e d is r e q u i r e d o n l y "if k n o w n " a n d the c a s e law i n d i c a t e s t h a t h a v i n g t h e w r o n g a d d r e s s is n o t f a t a l to t h e o r d e r . A c c o r d i n g l y , the FBI had FISC authority to c o v e r t h e t e l e p h o n e n u m b e r s in q u e s t i o n a n d t h u s t h e c o l l e c t i o n o b t a i n e d w h i l e t h e f a c i l i t i e s used by the target were located at a different address does not c o n s t i t u t e a v i o l a t i o n of t h e g u i d e l i n e s o r r e g u l a t i o n s a p p r o v e d by the Attorney G e n e r a l . (M It is o u r o p i n i o n that in t h i s i n s t a n c e t h e r e w a s n o v i o l a t i o n of t h e t a r g e t ' s r i g h t s o r of t h e g u i d e l i n e s o r r e g u l a t i o n s a p p r o v e d b y the A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l . B u t w e a l s o b e l i e v e t h a t b e c a u s e t h i s m a t t e r h a s b e e n b r o u g h t t o t h e a t t e n t i o n of the F I S C a s a p o s s i b l e i n c i d e n t of n o n - c o m p l i a n c e it n e e d s t o b e r e p o r t e d t o the I O B . T h e O f f i c e of G e n e r a l C o u n s e l f i l e d the minimization o r dissemination requirements specified in a FISC Order. 4

5

(U)

U . S . v- S k l a r o f f . 506 F.2d 837

(U)

U . S . v . De La F u e n t e . 548 F.2d 528

2BET 5

(5th C i r . 1975) . (5th C i r . 1 9 7 7 ) .

b l

b2 b7E , b/L

SE^ET T o : I n s p e c t i o n F r o m : O f f i c e of G e n e r a l C o u n s e l Re:(^J 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 12/28/2006

m e m o r a n d a w i t h t h e O f f i c e of I n t e l l i g e n c e a n d P o l i c y R e v i e w o n J u l y 21 a n d A u g u s t 1 4 , 2 0 0 6 , s t a t i n g t h e o p i n i o n set f o r t h a b o v e .

NSL V I 0 2 7 4 0 9

SECRET

(D) T o : I n s p e c t i o n F r o m : O f f i c e of G e n e r a l C o u n s e l Re:{$) 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 12/28/2006

LEAD(s) : Set Lead 1 :

(Info)

INSPECTION A T WASHINGTON. DC (U) Set Lead 2:

For action deemed

appropriate.

(Info)

C O U N T E R T E R R O R I SM A T I T O S II (U) Set Lead 3:

NSL V I O - 2 7 4 1 0

Read and clear.

(Info) b2

b7E

AT (U)

Read and clear.

7

THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI) From: Sent: To: Ce: Subject:

(OGC) (FBI) Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:17 PM | (FBI) IOGC) (FBI RE: IÜB 2ÜÜ7-

SECRËT7raOfeRfcL RECORD xxxx

b7C

Here is a revision o|

log

vpd

(2S MJJ

b2

OGC) (FBI)

|lQB. She is not here this week so I did it.

b2

-Original MessageFrom: THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI) Sent: Sunday. March 11. 2007 1:58 PM To: I |(OGC) (FBI) Cc: ](OGC) (FBI i C Subject: IOB 2007

NSL VIO-27411 CGC) (FBI)

b2 SECRËT//NOEORN RECORD xxxx

b5

h6

b7C

Julie F. Thomas DGC, National Security Law Branch Office of the General Counsel Room 7975

DERIVED FRbMyli/iultiple Sources DECLASSIFICA1HON EXEMPTION 1 SECRET//N0FORrt\

DERIVED Ffeoiyirlviultiple Sources DECLASSIFICATION EXEMPTION 1 SECRET//N0frOftN

3

THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI) From: Sent: To: Cc:

b6 bir. to 2 toi E

(OGC) (FBI) Ti I O C H Q W Mar^h 1 S 0007 1 ;59 PM JgC) (FBI) if= riv r-.APPnMi THOMAS, J m if F inrerwFRiv

\/ai fpif f

LLKE I //N9FGRNRECORD xxxxx

Julie: I spoke with both the SA and SSA involved in this matter; both stated that they ran the NSL by their CDC's office.

—Original Message— From: THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI)

Sent: To: Subject:

Sunday. Marrh 117007 1:05 PM ](OGC) (FBI); \(

I

(OGC) (FBI)

IOB 2007-

CCCRCT//NOrORN RECORD xxxxx NSL V I O - 2 7 4 1 3 b2 Julie F. Thomas DGC, National Security Law Branch Office of the General Counsel Room 7975

b7E b5 b6 b7C

DERIVED FROM:: MULHP pie Sources DECLA§€IFICATIO, lOK EX EXEMPTION 2 SECRET//I

DERIVED FROEi: Multiple Sources DECLASSIFjgÀTION EXEMPTION 2 SECRET//NÓFORN

7

(Rev. 01-31-2003)

SECRET

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

Precedence :

INVESTIGATION

ROUTINE

Date: 6 / 2 / 2 0 0 7

To:

Attn:

SAC ASAC CDC SSA SA

Counterterrorism

Attn:

I T O S I , C O N U S IV

Inspection

Attn:

Ms. Rm 11865

IIS,

b2

b7E From:

General Counsel W a h i n q a l Sftfinrif.v Contact:

Approved By:

Branch/CTT.TT

T.aw

TT/T,X-1

b6

3S-100

b7C

NSL VIO 27110

Thomas Julie F

Drafted By: (U)

C a s e I D #: Title:

2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 97 3 6 - V I O

(U)

(pending)

I n t e l l i g e n c e Oversight_ B o a r d (IOB) M a t t e r 2007

b2

(U)

Synopsis: ()£) It is t h e o p i n i o n of the O f f i c e of t h e G e n e r a l C o u n s e l t h a t t h e a b o v e r e f e r e n c e d m a t t e r n e e d n o t b e r e p o r t e d to t h e I n t e l l i g e n c e O v e r s i g h t B o a r d (IOB). O u r a n a l y s i s f o l l o w s . —

G 3 03/07/2032 278-HO-C122973 6 - V I O serial 278-1 1-136372 s e r i a l 127

Reference

2211

b l .b2

b7E

IS) Administrative: (U) T h i s c o m m u n i c a t i o n c o n t a i n s o n e o r m o r e footnotes. To read the footnotes, download and print the d o c u m e n t in C o r e l W o r d P e r f e c t .

b2 (U)-

Details: By electronic communication (278-HQ-C1229736 Serial 2211), Î È ^ Œ I

(EC) d a t e d 02/22 /2007 Field Office

b7E

SÎ^RËÎ^

To : (U) Re:

From:

General Counsel

278-HQ-C122973 6-VIO, 03/08/2007

b2 b7E

r e p o r t e d to t h e O f f i c e of t h e G e n e r a l C o u n s e l t h i s p o t e n t i a l IOB m a t t e r .

(OGC)

(S) b l a

1

I wnicn recordsT present

(S)

NHL1 H M I

swmjmlv

lui.lhi

(Nsi.i w a y

requested

±yyL ed

b7D b6

periods In r e s p o n s e to t h e N S L ,

b7C

andT ptòvidea

telephone

b2 b7E

rpnnrns

proviaea The agent did not realize ât Chê timë cnat the information w a s received that the additional information c o n s t i t u t e d a p o t e n t i a l IOB violatic^raji yf&yftfWf» w h e n t h e c a s e agent was informed b y the CDC on November 21, ^ 0 0 6 that there was a p r o b l e m w i t h the additional information, the case agent immediately retrieved the excess information from the closed case f i l e a n d s e q u e s t e r e d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n w i t h t h e C D C . In a d d i t i o n , t h e e x c e s s r e c o r d s w e r e r e m o v e d from the A u t o m a t e d C a s e S u p p o r t system. (U)

]

In t h i s c a s e , a n e r r o r o n t h e p a r t [ r e s u l t e d in t h e u n i n t e n t i o n a l a c q u i s i t i o n of i n f o r m a H o n . U p o n that learning that there was information received e x c e e d e d t h e s c o p e of t h e N S L , the c a s e a g e n t responded, immediately by removing and sequestering the information with the C D C p e n d i n g d i s p o s i t i o n of t h e m a t t e r . iu>

B a s e d u p o n o u r a n a l y s i s , t h e c a r r i e r ' s m i s t a k e is n o t r e p o r t a b l e to t h e IOB as t h e F B I h a s n o t a c t e d u n l a w f u l l y or c o n t r a r y to E x e c u t i v e O r d e r or P r e s i d e n t i a l D i r e c t i v e . Pursuant to t h e R e v i s e d P r o c e d u r e s for t h e S u b m i s s i o n of R e p o r t s of P o t e n t i a l I n t e l l i g e n c e O v e r s i g h t B o a r d (IOB) M a t t e r s , R e p o r t s of p o t e n t i a l IOB m a t t e r s d e t e r m i n e d b y O G C n o t to r e q u i r e n o t i f i c a t i o n to t h e IOB w i l l b e r e t a i n e d b y I N S D for t h r e e y e a r s for p o s s i b l e r e v i e w b y t h e C o u n s e l to t h e I O B , t o g e t h e r w i t h a c o p y of t h e o p i n i o n c o n c e r n i n g t h e b a s i1s f o r t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t IOB n o t i f i c a t i o n w a s n o t r e q u i r e d . Accordingly, OGC will

1

B y letter dated 11/13/2006, the Counsel to the IOB agreed that third p a r t y errors in the collection of information pursuant to an NSL m u s t be reported to O G C , but are not reportable to the S^feRET

b7D

SE^LEI To: Re:

W

General Counsel , From: 27H-HO-C1 22973 6-VIO, 03/08/2007

r e q u e s t that the I n s p e c t i o n D i v i s i o n r e t a i n a r e c o r d of the r e p o r t of a p o t e n t i a l IOB m a t t e r for three y e a r s , t o g e t h e r w i t h c o p y of this o p i n i o n for p o s s i b l e r e v i e w b y the C o u n s e l to the IOB.

NSL VIO-27421

IOB.

SE^ET

SJ^JÇJÉET To: I Re: (X)

~| From: General Counsel 278-HQ-C122973 6-VIO, 0 3 / 0 8 / 2 0 0 7

LEAD(s) :

Set Lead 1:

(Action)

AT (U) T h e f i e l d s h o u l d c o n t a c t t h e c a r r i e r a n d a s k w h e t h e r t h e i m p r o p e r l y or u n i n t e n t i o n a l l y a c q u i r e d i n f o r m a t i o n should be returned or destroyed, with appropriate documentation to the f i l e . Set Lead 2: (Info) COUNTERTERRORISM

A T W A S H I N G T O N . DC (U) Set Lead 3:

VIO-27422

Read and clear.

(Action)

INSPECTION AT WASHINGTON. DC (U) A s p r o v i d e d in the R e v i s e d P r o c e d u r e s f o r t h e S u b m i s s i o n of R e p o r t s of P o t e n t i a l I n t e l l i g e n c e O v e r s i g h t B o a r d (IOB) M a t t e r s , r e t a i n a r e c o r d of t h e r e p o r t of a p o t e n t i a l IOB m a t t e r for t h r e e y e a r s f o r p o s s i b l e r e v i e w b y t h e C o u n s e l to t h e I O B , t o g e t h e r w i t h a c o p y of the O G C o p i n i o n c o n c e r n i n g t h e b a s i s for t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t IOB n o t i f i c a t i o n is n o t r e q u i r e d .

SÇÇRET

4

X T H O M A S , J U L I E F. ( O G C ) (FBI) THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI) .SaiLuriay-MaiLQ5-?007 3:48 PM (CD) (FBI) £ 0 ) (FBI) RE: NSL to

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

b2 b7E b4 b7D b6 b7C

siCRETïïKOfeRN^ RECORD xxxxx

I have reviewed and it is ok to send. Julie F. Thomas DGC, National Security Law Branch Office of the General Counsel Rnnm 7075

—Original Message— From: | tCD) (FBI) Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:31 PM

To: Cc: Subject:

THfiMA^. 1111 IFF (OGC) (FBI) | Icm (FBI) NSL to|

NSL V I O - 2 7 4 2 3

b7C b2

.b7E

*SËCRSF^ RECORI

b4

b7D Julie, A t t a c h e d is a r e v i s e d v e r s i o n of the

E C for the N S L t

{

Please review the c u r r e n t v e r s i o n and advise if it is O K to send to >

Telephone Fax Secure Fax Internet E-mail : I CD-4A, RÖOH1 404;

b2 b6 b7C

DERIVED FROmT^K3 FBI Classification Guide G-3. dated 1/97. Foreign Counterintelligence Investigations DECLASSIFICATION EXEMPTION*! SECRET

DERIVED FROM: M DECLASSIFICATI

2

X THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI) (CD) (FBI) vvöuriösuay, May u!2, 2007 1:31 PM THOMAS. JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI) (CD) (FBI) NSLto[

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

b7D b6 b7C b2

RECORI

b7E

Julie, A t t a c h e d is a Please review the c u r r e n t v e r s i o n and advise if it is O K to send tc

to 2 toi E to A b7D

I

[jSL.wpd (33 KB) NSL V I O - 2 7 4 2 4

ÏTiharnab R-mai CD-4A,

Telephone Fax S e c u r e Fax

to 2 to 6 tolC

Room 4 8 4 7

DERIVED FROM: G-3 DECLASSIFICATION EXEMPT SECRET

Y

^5Tdated 1/97. Foreign Counterintelligence Investigations

4

V THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBI) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

CAPRONI, VALERIE E. (OGC) (FBI) Friday. April 27. 2007 11:03 AM I , \ r . r n } (FBI); BILLY, JOSEPH (CTD) (FBI); THOMAS, JULIE F. (OGC) (FBhl liCTD) (FBI) FRAHM, CHARLES E. (CTD) (FBI) (CTD) (FBI); (CTD) (FBI) RE: Request

b7C

SECRET RECORD 315n

Thanks. -—Original MessageFrom: | (CTD) (FBI) Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:12 AM CAPRONI. VALERIF F . f f l f i n (FBI1 To: Cc: p D ) (FBI);[ Subject: Kb: Request

SECRET RECORD 315n

h6 blC TD) (FBI); -ndûMLJULIEf-iOGC) (FBI); KCTD) (FBI)| |CTD) (FBI)

CTD) (FBI)

NSL VIO-27425

Valerie, CAU will work with We'll review A U b a n a c n e c k w n n 11 u b r e g a r d i n g trie o a c K g r o u n u Tor e a c n r e q u e s t 10 determine the exigency. We'll also provide you with the date the legal paper was served on'" for each of the telephone numbers. We'll reach out to the|

|reps to get this info ASAP. b2 b4

Please page

and/oj

~|to get responses to some of these questions. Thanks.

b7D b6

b7C

Communications flnafysis Vnit Communications 'EjçpCoitation Section cm

—Original Message— From: CAPRONI, VALERIE E. (OGC) (FBI) Sent: Th».rW Anril 7007 5:33 PM To: I t(CTD) (FBI); BILI Y lOSEPH fCTD) (FBI); THOMAS, JUUE F. (OGC) (FBI); Cc: FRAHM, CHARLES E. (CTD) (FBI (CTD) (FBI) c Subject: RE: Request

>

[CTD) (FBI)

b7C

X SECRET R E C O R D 315n

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, but I need s o m e more detail on this. Of the

1 b2 b5

—Original Message( From: CTD) (FBI) J Sent: flw, To: BILLY, JOSEPH (CTD) (FBI) Ce: FRAHM, CHARLES E (CTD (FBI) Subject: FW: Request

b6 CTD) (FBI); CAPRONI, VALERIE E. (OGC) (FBI)

b7C

SECRET R E C O R D 315n

Mr. Billy, 3

b2 b6

b7C .bl

(S)

ursuant to the copy of the email I received fdfiiHvTr)-77ttPife pmail below rom| Exigent Letters advises that since I |had| rom UAU. bacn exigent letter was followed up by an NSL or a subpoena from the requestinn entity (fi^ld office or CT operational unit), ] o f the | Exigent letters was for the

b2 b6

Communications JlnaCysis Vnit Communications 6S) 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 7

(S)

b l b6

b7C

NSL VIO-2744Q

are as

T h e t a r g e t n u m b e r s d o c u m e n t e d in t h e follows:

NSL dated 7/5/2006 b4

b7D

(S)

b l

SECRET 1

f

b7C

.bl

^QRET 10)-

To; Re

b6

b7C

Inspection From: Counterterrorism (X 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

(SJ

NSL VIO-27441

(X) T h e t a r g e t n u m b e r s d o c u m e n t e d in the) are as follows:

|NSL d a t e d

8/25/2006

m b4

(S)

b7D bl b6

b7C

SEckl 8

ET To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism Re:(^T 27 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 7

bl b6 b7C

NSL VIO-27442

SEC^pT 9

SÇfyRET To:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

Re:(X)

bl h

6

b7C

NSL VIO-27443

SOCKET 10

Sfe^ET To: Re:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism J^j 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27444

SEb^ET 11

bl to 6 tolC

sì^ ET Tp: Inspection From: Counterterrorism Re:(X) 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V T O , 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27445

¡kg ET 12

bl h6 blC

SÌ^BET T o : I n s p e c t i o n From: Counterterrorism R e : --Jsrf 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 02/23/2007

bl b6

.b7C

NSL VIO-27446

SE^pT

SECRET To: I n s p e c t i o n F r o m : Counterterrorism Re:>3) 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

bl b6 b7C

NSL VIO-27447

SECRET 14

SEGRET To: Re:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism (0278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

toi h6

.b7C

NSL VIO-27448

ïô|ET

sì^RET To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism R e : 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27449

SECRET 16

bl b6 b7C

To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism Re:fog 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27450

SJâ&E SßCfiET 17

bl b6 b7C

S^RET To : Re:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism ^ 278-HQ-C12297 3 6-VIO, 02/23/2007

bl b6 b7C

NSL VIO-27451

SÈ&ET 18

RET (U) -

To: Re:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism ygQ 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

bl h6

b7C

(S)

NSL VIO-27452

SEj^ET 19

SECRET To; Re:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism {&) 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 7

NSL VIO-27453

SECRET 20

SE^ET

To: I n s p e c t i o n From: Counterterrorism R e : 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 02/23/2007

bl b6 b7C

NSL VIO-27454

SE(^T

RET To : Re:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism CS) 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 02/23/2007

bl b6 b7C

NSL VIO-27455

SE^ET

b l b6

S&^ET |U1

b7C

To: inspection From: Counter terror ism R e : m 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

(S)\

NSL VIO-27456

(SJ

T b o f oi i i-it.ti n p t a r g e t n u m b e r s w e r e in i n c l u d e d in C A U ' s N S L to Investigation: dated10/20/2006forthd

SECRET 23

b7C bl b2 b7E b6 b7C

RET To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism Re:>£) 278-HQ-C122973 6-VIO, 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27457

SEO&T ^24

bl

b6 b7C

SECRET inspection From: Counterterrorism 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27458

S^ET

SECRET Inspection From: Counterterrorism PÁ) 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 7

NSL VIO-27459

SÊj^ET

SEtRET To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism Re:£8$ 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

toi h6

.b7C

NSL VIO-27460

SECRET

I n s p e c t i o n From: Counterterrorism ~$ÄJ[ 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27461

S^ET

To: I n s p e c t i o n From: Counterterrorism Re:(X) 27 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 7

NSL VIO-27462

SE^ET

bl b6 b7C

Sf&^ET To: Re:

I n s p e c t i o n From: Counterterrorism -EST 2 7 8 -HO -CI 2 29736 - V I O . 02/23/2007

bl b6

b7C

NSL VIO-27463

S^RET

'30

S^ëgÇT To: Inspection From: C o u n t e r t e r r o r i s m R e : ( X 27 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 02/23/2007

bl bg

b7C

NSL VIO-27464

31

SECRET

bl to 6 tolC

To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism R e : 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 02/23/2007

(s:

NSL VIO-27465

b l

"jfsSO T h e f o l l o w i n g t a r g e t n u m b e r s w e r e 9 / 1 9 / 2 0 0 6 N S L to| | in s u p p o r t of

(S)

i n c l u d ed in C A U ' s

to 2

b7E b4

b7D \$£CRET

32

SECRET To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism Re:£S0 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27466

bl b6

b7C

S^El To: I n s p e c t i o n F r o m : Counterterrorism Re:CSO 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , 02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27467

34

bl b6 b7C

SEÒ^ET (U) -

To : Re:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism (X) 2 7 8 - H O - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O . 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 7

hi b l b6

b7C

9/19/2006

NSLtd

¿lowing target insupportoq

nnmbprs

wprp

irirlnHPfì in C A U '

S

.b7D b l

liCJ

b2

b7E NSL VIO-27468

SE^T

35

SEi To: Re:

Inspection From: Counterterrorism £83 2 7 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 9 7 3 6 - V I O , .02/23/2007

NSL VIO-27469

jfSi. T h e following target n u m b e r s w e r e included in C A U ' s insupportof

b4

.b7D bl b2 b7E b6 '36

b7C

SI^ET To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism Re:pg) 27 8 - H Q - C 1 2 2 97 3 6 - V I O , 0 2 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 7

NSL VIO-27470

b l b6

b7C

sá&RET 37

S^ET

(ui

To: Inspection From: Counterterrorism Re:O&O 278-HQ-C1229736-VIO, 02/23/2007

(SJ

b l b6

b7C

NSL VIO-27471

SEt^ET 38